社区
首页
集团介绍
社区
资讯
行情
学堂
TigerAI
登录
注册
immryan
IP属地:未知
+关注
帖子 · 24
帖子 · 24
关注 · 0
关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0
粉丝 · 0
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-24
Ok
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
2,657
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-22
Good
Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>
The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs. ISTOCKPHOTO In the rolling correcti
Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>
看
3,612
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-19
Good
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
4,483
回复
1
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-17
That is not good
Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales<blockquote>零售销售降幅超出预期后股市开盘走低</blockquote>
(Aug 17) Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales. Dow industrials fall 291
Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales<blockquote>零售销售降幅超出预期后股市开盘走低</blockquote>
看
2,390
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-16
Good
Fed Officials Weigh Ending Asset Purchases by Mid-2022<blockquote>美联储官员考虑在 2022 年中期结束资产购买</blockquote>
Reducing bond buying sooner could provide more flexibility to raise interest rates if inflation stay
Fed Officials Weigh Ending Asset Purchases by Mid-2022<blockquote>美联储官员考虑在 2022 年中期结束资产购买</blockquote>
看
3,265
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-16
Good!
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
3,684
回复
评论
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-12
Like !
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
3,735
回复
1
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-10
Good and like !
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
3,650
回复
评论
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-09
Like !
Morrisons suitor CD&R gets more time to trump $9.3 billion offer<blockquote>莫里森的追求者 CD&R 有更多时间接受特朗普 93 亿美元的报价</blockquote>
LONDON (Reuters) -Morrisons suitor, U.S. private equity group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), has w
Morrisons suitor CD&R gets more time to trump $9.3 billion offer<blockquote>莫里森的追求者 CD&R 有更多时间接受特朗普 93 亿美元的报价</blockquote>
看
3,716
回复
2
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
immryan
immryan
·
2021-08-08
Good and like :)
非常抱歉,此主贴已删除
看
3,960
回复
评论
点赞
5
编组 21备份 2
分享
举报
加载更多
暂无粉丝
热议股票
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3582024918476098","uuid":"3582024918476098","gmtCreate":1618932477186,"gmtModify":1618932477186,"name":"immryan","pinyin":"immryan","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":7,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":834270433,"gmtCreate":1629810577222,"gmtModify":1631891663461,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/834270433","repostId":"1154386229","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2657,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832955137,"gmtCreate":1629567453829,"gmtModify":1631891663465,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/832955137","repostId":"1151608193","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151608193","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629728324,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1151608193?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-23 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151608193","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correcti","content":"<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuy the pullback in chip stocks — and focus on these 6 companies for the long haul<blockquote>买入芯片股的回调——长期关注这 6 家公司</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-23 22:18</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.</b></p><p><blockquote><b>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%。</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b24e4a76a5d1cd0ff030cf1b0eeac0f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>ISTOCKPHOTO</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.</p><p><blockquote>在股市的滚动调整中,芯片制造商受到的打击比大多数制造商都要大。</blockquote></p><p> The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.</p><p><blockquote>iShares 半导体 ETF 较近期高点下跌超过 6%,而标准普尔 500 指数、纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的跌幅为 2% 或更少。</blockquote></p><p> Does that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.</p><p><blockquote>这是否意味着芯片股票值得买入?或者,这个历史上具有周期性的行业是否故技重施,陷入持续下跌趋势,让你大吃一惊。</blockquote></p><p> A lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”</p><p><blockquote>很大程度上取决于您的时间表,但如果您喜欢持有股票多年,而不是租用几天,那么该集团值得购买。主要原因: “这次不一样”。</blockquote></p><p> Those are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.</p><p><blockquote>这些无疑是投资中最可怕的词语之一。但芯片行业已经发生了很大的变化,现在确实不同了——这表明它不太可能压垮你。</blockquote></p><p> You’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为没有风险,那你就是个傻瓜。我会回顾一下这些。但首先,以下是该集团现在 “更安全 ”的三个主要原因--以及我在过去几天里与六位行业专家交谈过的六位行业专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.周期性的邪恶女巫死了</b></blockquote></p><p> “Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">First</a> PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.</p><p><blockquote>“Impax Asset Management 的投资组合经理 David Winborne 说:”受产品周期的驱动,芯片行业的需求总是时好时坏。“<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FBNC\">第一</a>电脑,然后是服务器,然后是电话。”但他表示,现在整个经济对芯片的需求已经扩大,因此长期增长故事更可预测。</blockquote></p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">Just</a> look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a>, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JE\">刚刚</a>看看你周围。由于我们的生活和工作日益 “数字化 ”,终端市场需求从各个角度都更加多样化。把远程办公服务想象成<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">缩放</a>看好该集团的 Gabelli Funds 投资组合经理兼技术分析师 Hendi Susanto 指出,网上购物、云服务、电动汽车、5G 手机、智能工厂、大数据计算甚至洗衣机。</blockquote></p><p> “There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”</p><p><blockquote>“Motley Fool 芯片行业分析师 John Rotonti 说:”现代数字经济的任何方面都离不开半导体。“这意味着所有东西都有更多的筹码。长期需求是存在的”。</blockquote></p><p> He’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.</p><p><blockquote>他没开玩笑。威廉·布莱尔分析师格雷格·斯科拉罗预测,到2030年,芯片行业的收入将从2020年的4650亿美元翻一番,达到1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> All of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a> chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> confirmed by a majority of large customers.”</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都意味着,你听到的大范围供应短缺 “可能要到明年年底的某个时候才能得到解决”。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>芯片行业分析师 Vivek Arya。“这不仅是我们的观点,而且<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>大多数大客户都证实了这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. The players have consolidated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2、玩家巩固</b></blockquote></p><p> All up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.</p><p><blockquote>在生产链的上下游,从设计到各类设备生产商再到制造,行业参与者已经整合成罗通蒂-评级 “赢得 ”的双头垄断或垄断。</blockquote></p><p> In chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.</p><p><blockquote>在芯片设计软件中,你有Cadence Design Systems和Synopsys。在生产设备方面,公司在极紫外光刻 (EUV) 等专业领域占据主导地位,例如 ASML。制造业由台积电和三星电子主导。</blockquote></p><p> These companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>这些公司通过在他们所做的事情上做到最好,赢得了他们的利基或双寡头地位。这使得投资者对它们感兴趣。Rotonti 表示,整合还意味着参与者在定价和产能方面的行为更加理性。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Profitability has improved</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3、盈利能力有所改善</b></blockquote></p><p> This more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.</p><p><blockquote>这种更加理性的行为,加上成本削减,意味着现在的盈利能力比历史上高得多。“温伯恩说:”在过去的几年里,芯片制造的经济性有了很大的改善。现金流或 EBITDA 利润率现在通常超过 30%,而十年前则在 20% 左右。</blockquote></p><p> This has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”</p><p><blockquote>这对估值有影响。Villere & Co. 的投资组合经理拉马尔·维莱尔 (Lamar Villere) 指出,尽管芯片股票的交易市盈率约为市盈率,但它们看起来很便宜,因为它们是更好的公司。“他们并没有以泡沫倍数进行交易”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The stocks to buy</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要买的股票</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.</p><p><blockquote>以下是我最近核实的芯片专家青睐的六个名字。</blockquote></p><p> <b>New management plays</b></p><p><blockquote><b>新管理层玩法</b></blockquote></p><p> Though Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 Thrivent 高级股票研究分析师彼得·卡拉泽里斯 (Peter Karazeris) 有理由对该集团持谨慎态度(见下文),但他特别指出了两家公司的业绩可能会因为新管理层而得到提振:高通和安森美半导体。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Both have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">ON Semiconductor</a> is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.</p><p><blockquote>两者都具有稳定的盈利能力。高通最近受到德克萨斯州恶劣天气等一次性问题的打击,导致生产中断,但该公司对5G手机趋势有很好的了解。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ON\">半导体</a>正在将手机以外的领域扩展到汽车、工业和物联网等新领域——联网设备领域。</blockquote></p><p> <b>A data center and gaming play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>数据中心和游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> Karazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.</p><p><blockquote>Karazeris 还特别提到了 Nvidia, 由于其卓越的设计能力, Nvidia 从数据中心和游戏设备芯片需求中获得了持续提振。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Design tool companies</b></p><p><blockquote><b>设计工具公司</b></blockquote></p><p> Speaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">Synopsys</a>.</p><p><blockquote>说到设计,当高通和英伟达等公司想要设计芯片时,他们会求助于Cadence Design Systems提供的设计工具和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNPS\">概要</a>.</blockquote></p><p> Their software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.</p><p><blockquote>Motley Fool 的 Rotonti 解释说,他们基于软件的设计工具可以帮助芯片创新者为他们的芯片创建蓝图,他特别指出了这些名字。“他们不是世界上增长最快的公司,但他们的利润率很高”。他们也主宰了太空。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An EUV play</b></p><p><blockquote><b>EUV游戏</b></blockquote></p><p> To put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.</p><p><blockquote>为了在芯片生产的早期阶段将这些蓝图应用到硅上,台积电和三星等公司转向了ASML。它的机器使用微小的光脉冲将芯片设计模板印在硅片上,这一过程称为极紫外线光刻。“罗通蒂说:”其他人还没有想出怎么做。</blockquote></p><p> In other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说,它在供应这样做的机器方面拥有垄断地位——这对于任何想要制造领先芯片的公司来说都是必要的。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Risks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Here are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.</p><p><blockquote>以下是芯片行业投资者需要关注的一些主要风险。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Oversupply</b></p><p><blockquote><b>供过于求</b></blockquote></p><p> Chip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a> wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.</p><p><blockquote>芯片生产已经政治化。美国希望在国内生产更多,这样它就不会受到中国供应链中断的影响。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">中国</a>Winborne 表示,希望到 2025 年生产其使用的芯片的 70%,高于目前的 5%。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.</p><p><blockquote>结果是,政府为促进制造业提供了大量支持,因此会有更多支持。风险是未来某个时候供应过剩。这也可能会推动芯片设备的采购,导致未来的平静,这可能会损害设备制造商的销售和利润率趋势。</blockquote></p><p> Next, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.</p><p><blockquote>接下来,像Alphabet、苹果和亚马逊这样的大型科技公司都在做自己的芯片设计,这威胁到了做同样事情的专业芯片公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">Quantum</a> computing</b></p><p><blockquote><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QTM\">量子的</a>计算机的</b></blockquote></p><p> Computers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”</p><p><blockquote>William Blair 的 Scolaro 指出,使用基于量子物理学的芯片设计而不是传统半导体架构的计算机具有卓越的性能。“虽然量子计算可能至少在未来五年内不会成为主流,但它有潜力改变从技术到医疗保健的一切。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>A disturbing signal</b></p><p><blockquote><b>干扰信号</b></blockquote></p><p> A blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.</p><p><blockquote>全球采购经理人 (PMI) 指数在 4 月份达到峰值,然后连续三个月放缓。与此同时,芯片销售持续增长。Thrivent 跟踪该指标的 Karazeris 指出,通常两者遵循相同的趋势。他将这种差异归因于库存积累,而库存积累不如真正的终端市场需求可持续。因此,他认为这种背离是芯片行业的看跌信号。</blockquote></p><p> Another cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.</p><p><blockquote>另一个警告信号来自动态随机存取存储器(DRAM)芯片定价的预测疲软。“卡拉泽里斯说:”这些通常是在周期的顶部而不是底部看到的东西。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.</p><p><blockquote>但也有可能全球采购经理人指数的放缓更多的是芯片短缺的反映,而不是短缺并非真实存在的迹象(只是库存积压)。“Leuthold 经济学家兼策略师吉姆-保尔森(Jim Paulsen)说:”这种分歧并不一定意味着芯片订单会翻盘消亡。这意味着芯片制造业必须迎头赶上。</blockquote></p><p> Ford,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.</p><p><blockquote>例如,福特刚刚宣布不得不减产是因为芯片短缺,而不是潜在需求不足。</blockquote></p><p> Paulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> cars.</p><p><blockquote>保尔森预测,由于高储蓄率、就业和收入反弹以及对大件商品被压抑的需求等因素,体面的经济增长是可持续的。如果他是对的,持续的经济实力将支撑对所有使用芯片的产品的需求,包括<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">福特</a>汽车。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNPS":"新思科技","AAPL":"苹果","TSM":"台积电","QCOM":"高通","NVDA":"英伟达","CDNS":"铿腾电子","GOOG":"谷歌","ASML":"阿斯麦","GOOGL":"谷歌A","SSNLF":"三星电子","AMZN":"亚马逊","SOXX":"iShares费城交易所半导体ETF","ON":"安森美半导体"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/buy-the-pullback-in-chip-stocks-and-focus-on-these-6-companies-for-the-long-haul-11629468380?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151608193","content_text":"The iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs.\nISTOCKPHOTO\nIn the rolling correction that’s running through the stock market, chip makers have been hit harder than most.\nThe iShares Semiconductor ETF is down over 6% from recent highs, compared to declines of 2% or less for the S&P 500,Nasdaq Composite and the Dow Jones Industrial Average.\nDoes that make chip stocks a buy? Or is this historically cyclical sector up to its old tricks and headed into a sustained downtrend that will rip your face off.\nA lot depends on your timeline but if you like to own stocks for years rather than rent them for days, the group is a buy. The chief reason: “It’s different this time.”\nThose are admittedly among the scariest words in investing. But the chip sector has changed so much it really is different now – in ways that suggest it is less likely to crush you.\nYou’d be a fool to think there are no risks. I’ll go over those. But first, here are the three main reasons why the group is “safer” now – and six names favored by the half-dozen sector experts I’ve talked with over the past several days.\n1. The wicked witch of cyclicality is dead\n“Demand in the chip sector was always boom and bust, driven by product cycles,” says David Winborne, a portfolio manager at Impax Asset Management. “First PCs, then servers, then phones.” But now demand for chips has broadened across the economy so the secular growth story is more predictable, he says.\nJust look around you. Because of the increased “digitalization” of our lives and work, there’s greater diversity of end market demand from all angles. Think remote office services like Zoom, online shopping, cloud services, electric vehicles, 5G phones, smart factories, big data computing and even washing machines, points out Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager and tech analyst at Gabelli Funds who is bullish on the group.\n“There is no aspect of the modern digital economy that can function without semiconductors,” says Motley Fool chip sector analyst John Rotonti. “That means more chips going into everything. The long-term demand is there.”\nHe’s not kidding. Chip sector revenue will double by 2030 to $1 trillion from $465 billion in 2020, predicts William Blair analyst Greg Scolaro.\nAll of this means the widespread supply shortages you’ve been hearing about “likely won’t be cured until sometime late next year,” says Bank of America chip sector analyst Vivek Arya. “That’s not just our view, but one confirmed by a majority of large customers.”\n2. The players have consolidated\nAll up and down the production chain, from design through the various types of equipment producers to manufacturing, industry players have consolidated down into what Rotonti calls “earned” duopolies or monopolies.\nIn chip design software, you have Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.In production equipment, companies dominate specialized niches like ASML in extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV). Manufacturing is dominated by Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung Electronics.\nThese companies earned their niche or duopoly status by being the best at what they do. This makes them interesting for investors. The consolidation also means players behave more rationally in terms of pricing and production capacity, says Rotonti.\n3. Profitability has improved\nThis more rational behavior, combined with cost cutting, means profitability is now much higher than it was historically. “The economics of chip making has improved massively over past few years,” says Winbourne. Cash flow or EBITDA margins are often now over 30% whereas a decade ago they were in the 20% range.\nThis has implications for valuation. Though chip stocks trade at about a market multiple, they appear cheap because they are better companies, points out Lamar Villere, portfolio manager with Villere & Co. “They are not trading at a frothy multiple.”\nThe stocks to buy\nHere are six names favored by chip experts I recently checked in with.\nNew management plays\nThough Peter Karazeris, a senior equity research analyst at Thrivent, has reasons to be cautious on the group (see below), he singles out two companies whose performance may get a boost because they are under new management: Qualcomm and ON Semiconductor.\nBoth have solid profitability. Qualcomm was recently hit by one-off issues like bad weather in Texas that disrupted production, but the company has good exposure to the 5G phone trend. ON Semiconductor is expanding beyond phones into new areas like autos, industrial and the Internet of Things connected-device space.\nA data center and gaming play\nKarazeris also singles out Nvidia,which gets a continuing boost from its exposure to data center and gaming device chip demand — because of its superior design prowess.\nDesign tool companies\nSpeaking of design, when companies like Qualcomm and NVIDIA want to design chips, they turn to the design tools supplied by Cadence Design Systems and Synopsys.\nTheir software-based design tools help chip innovators create the blueprint for their chips, explains Rotonti at Motley Fool, who singles out these names. “They are not the fastest growers in the world, but they have good profit margins.” They also dominate the space.\nAn EUV play\nTo put those blueprints onto silicon in the early stages of chip production, companies like Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung turn to ASML. Its machines use tiny bursts of light to stencil chip designs onto silicon wafers, in a process called extreme ultraviolet lithography. “No one else has figured out how to do it,” says Rotonti.\nIn other words, it has a monopoly position in supplying machines that do this – which are necessary for any company that wants to make leading edge chips.\nRisks\nHere are some of the chief risks for chip sector investors to watch.\nOversupply\nChip production has become politicized. The U.S. wants more production at home so it is not vulnerable to disruptions in Chinese supply chains. China wants to make 70% of the chips it uses by 2025, up from 5% now, says Winborne.\nThe upshot here is that there’s lots of government support to boost manufacturing – so there will be much more of it. The risk is oversupply at some point in the future. This might also create a pull forward in chip equipment purchases — leading to a lull down the road which could hurt sales and margin trends at equipment makers.\nNext, big tech companies like Alphabet,Apple and Ammazon.com are all doing their own chip design, which threatens specialized chip companies that do the same thing.\nQuantum computing\nComputers using chip designs based on quantum physics instead of traditional semiconductor architectures have superior performance, points out Scolaro at William Blair. “While it probably won’t become mainstream for at least another five years, quantum computing has the potential to transform everything from technology to healthcare.”\nA disturbing signal\nA blend of global purchasing managers (PMI) indexes peaked in April and then decelerated for three months. Meanwhile chip sales growth continued. Normally the two follow the same trend, points out Karazeris, who tracks this indicator at Thrivent. He chalks the divergence up to inventory building which is less sustainable than true end-market demand. So, he takes the divergence as a bearish signal for the chip sector.\nAnother cautionary sign comes from the forecasted weakness in pricing for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. “These are typically things you see at tops of cycles not the bottoms,” says Karazeris.\nBut it’s also possible the slowdown in the global PMI is more a reflection of chip shortages than a sign that the shortages aren’t real (and are just inventory building). “The divergence doesn’t necessarily mean that chip orders are going to roll over and die. It means chip manufacturing has to catch up,” says Leuthold economist and strategist Jim Paulsen.\nFord,for example, just announced it had to curtail production because of chip shortages, not a shortfall in underlying demand.\nPaulsen predicts decent economic growth is sustainable because of factors like high savings rates, the rebound in employment and incomes as well as pent-up demand for big ticket items. If he’s right, the continued economic strength would support demand for all the products that use chips – including Ford cars.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"ON":0.9,"SOXX":0.9,"ASML":0.9,"TSM":0.9,"SSNLF":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"SNPS":0.9,"NVDA":0.9,"CDNS":0.9,"QCOM":0.9,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838036371,"gmtCreate":1629357279293,"gmtModify":1631891663468,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/838036371","repostId":"1152703663","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4483,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833136400,"gmtCreate":1629209562400,"gmtModify":1631891663472,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"That is not good","listText":"That is not good","text":"That is not good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833136400","repostId":"1146168029","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146168029","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1629206834,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1146168029?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-17 21:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales<blockquote>零售销售降幅超出预期后股市开盘走低</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146168029","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(Aug 17) Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales.\nDow industrials fall 291","content":"<p>(Aug 17) Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales.</p><p><blockquote>(8月17日)零售销售降幅超出预期后,股市开盘走低。</blockquote></p><p> Dow industrials fall 291 points, or 0.8%. S&P 500 drops 0.7% to 4,448.21. Nasdaq Composite down 0.9% at 14,650.41.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业指数下跌 291 点,跌幅 0.8%。标普500下跌 0.7%,至 4,448.21。纳斯达克综合指数下跌 0.9%,至 14,650.41 点。</blockquote></p><p> China tech stocks slump as China’s market regulator issued draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国市场监管机构发布了禁止中国网络平台运营商之间不正当竞争的规则草案,中国科技股暴跌。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/792e1772879dc34b07a1aad8629d5ca1\" tg-width=\"375\" tg-height=\"853\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Dow member Home Depot fell more than 4% after reporting second-quarter results, knocking futures. While quarterly earnings topped estimates, same-store sales rose 4.5% in the period, below the 5% consensus estimate of analysts polled by StreetAccount. U.S. same store sales increased by just 3.4%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数成份股家得宝 (Home Depot) 公布第二季度业绩后股价下跌超过 4%,打击期货。虽然季度收益超出预期,但同店销售额同期增长了 4.5%,低于 StreetAccount 调查的分析师 5% 的普遍预期。美国同店销售额仅增长3.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e4c94ff0a55a39c655244dde44c44ae\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Walmart shares gained 0.27% after second-quarter earnings topped estimates. The retailer issued cautious guidance; the company said it will earn between $1.30 and $1.40 a share this quarter while the consensus analyst estimate is $1.32, according to StreetAccount.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度盈利超出预期后,沃尔玛股价上涨 0.27%。零售商发布了谨慎的指引;根据 StreetAccount 的数据,该公司表示本季度每股收益将在 1.30 美元至 1.40 美元之间,而分析师的普遍预期为 1.32 美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc921ddb3f633aa1f233242ac43da84c\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales<blockquote>零售销售降幅超出预期后股市开盘走低</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales<blockquote>零售销售降幅超出预期后股市开盘走低</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-17 21:27</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Aug 17) Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales.</p><p><blockquote>(8月17日)零售销售降幅超出预期后,股市开盘走低。</blockquote></p><p> Dow industrials fall 291 points, or 0.8%. S&P 500 drops 0.7% to 4,448.21. Nasdaq Composite down 0.9% at 14,650.41.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业指数下跌 291 点,跌幅 0.8%。标普500下跌 0.7%,至 4,448.21。纳斯达克综合指数下跌 0.9%,至 14,650.41 点。</blockquote></p><p> China tech stocks slump as China’s market regulator issued draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.</p><p><blockquote>由于中国市场监管机构发布了禁止中国网络平台运营商之间不正当竞争的规则草案,中国科技股暴跌。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/792e1772879dc34b07a1aad8629d5ca1\" tg-width=\"375\" tg-height=\"853\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Dow member Home Depot fell more than 4% after reporting second-quarter results, knocking futures. While quarterly earnings topped estimates, same-store sales rose 4.5% in the period, below the 5% consensus estimate of analysts polled by StreetAccount. U.S. same store sales increased by just 3.4%.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数成份股家得宝 (Home Depot) 公布第二季度业绩后股价下跌超过 4%,打击期货。虽然季度收益超出预期,但同店销售额同期增长了 4.5%,低于 StreetAccount 调查的分析师 5% 的普遍预期。美国同店销售额仅增长3.4%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e4c94ff0a55a39c655244dde44c44ae\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Walmart shares gained 0.27% after second-quarter earnings topped estimates. The retailer issued cautious guidance; the company said it will earn between $1.30 and $1.40 a share this quarter while the consensus analyst estimate is $1.32, according to StreetAccount.</p><p><blockquote>第二季度盈利超出预期后,沃尔玛股价上涨 0.27%。零售商发布了谨慎的指引;根据 StreetAccount 的数据,该公司表示本季度每股收益将在 1.30 美元至 1.40 美元之间,而分析师的普遍预期为 1.32 美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc921ddb3f633aa1f233242ac43da84c\" tg-width=\"1129\" tg-height=\"653\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146168029","content_text":"(Aug 17) Stocks open lower after larger-than-expected drop in retail sales.\nDow industrials fall 291 points, or 0.8%. S&P 500 drops 0.7% to 4,448.21. Nasdaq Composite down 0.9% at 14,650.41.\nChina tech stocks slump as China’s market regulator issued draft rules banning unfair competition among the nation’s online platform operators.\nDow member Home Depot fell more than 4% after reporting second-quarter results, knocking futures. While quarterly earnings topped estimates, same-store sales rose 4.5% in the period, below the 5% consensus estimate of analysts polled by StreetAccount. U.S. same store sales increased by just 3.4%.\n\nWalmart shares gained 0.27% after second-quarter earnings topped estimates. The retailer issued cautious guidance; the company said it will earn between $1.30 and $1.40 a share this quarter while the consensus analyst estimate is $1.32, according to StreetAccount.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2390,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839390731,"gmtCreate":1629121217123,"gmtModify":1631891663475,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good ","listText":"Good ","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839390731","repostId":"1165935172","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165935172","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629118103,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1165935172?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-16 20:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Officials Weigh Ending Asset Purchases by Mid-2022<blockquote>美联储官员考虑在 2022 年中期结束资产购买</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165935172","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Reducing bond buying sooner could provide more flexibility to raise interest rates if inflation stay","content":"<p> Reducing bond buying sooner could provide more flexibility to raise interest rates if inflation stays high and unemployment falls rapidly. Federal Reserve officials are nearing agreement to begin scaling back their easy money policies in about three months if the economic recovery continues, with some pushing to end their asset-purchase program by the middle of next year.</p><p><blockquote>如果通胀居高不下、失业率迅速下降,尽快减少债券购买可以为加息提供更大的灵活性。如果经济复苏持续,美联储官员即将同意在大约三个月内开始缩减宽松货币政策,一些官员正在推动在明年年中结束资产购买计划。</blockquote></p><p> In recent interviews and public statements, several have advocated for this timetable, which would enable them to raise interest rates sooner than currently anticipated if the economy makes rapid progress toward their goals.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的采访和公开声明中,一些人主张这一时间表,如果经济在实现其目标方面取得快速进展,这将使他们能够比目前预期的更早加息。</blockquote></p><p> The central bank last December said it would continue the current pace of bond purchases until officials concluded they had achieved “substantial further progress” toward their goals of 2% average inflation and robust employment.</p><p><blockquote>央行去年 12 月表示,将继续保持目前的债券购买速度,直到官员们得出结论,他们在实现平均通胀率 2% 和强劲就业的目标方面取得了 “实质性的进一步进展”。</blockquote></p><p> Officials at their July 27-28 meetingdeliberated on two important questions: when to start paring their monthly purchases of $80 billion in Treasury securities and $40 billion in mortgage securities, and how quickly to reduce, or taper, them. The Fed is set to release on Wednesday minutes of the meeting that could provide further clues about those discussions.</p><p><blockquote>官员们在 7 月 27 日至 28 日的会议上讨论了两个重要问题:何时开始削减每月购买的 800 亿美元国债和 400 亿美元抵押贷款证券,以及如何快速减少或缩减这些资产。美联储将于周三公布会议纪要,这可能会提供有关这些讨论的进一步线索。</blockquote></p><p> The answers are important to financial markets because Fed officials have said they would prefer to conclude the bond-buying program before considering when to raise interest rates from near-zero. At their June 15-16 policy meeting, 13 of 18 Fed officials projected they would raise rates by the end of 2023; seven expected to do so by the end of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>这些答案对金融市场很重要,因为美联储官员表示,他们宁愿在考虑何时从接近于零的利率上调之前结束债券购买计划。在 6 月 15 日至 16 日的政策会议上,18 名美联储官员中有 13 名预计将在 2023 年底前加息;预计到 2022 年底将有 7 家这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said at a July 28 news conference that the Fed was still “a ways away from considering raising interest rates. It’s not something that is on our radar screen right now.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)在 7 月 28 日的新闻发布会上表示,美联储 “距离考虑加息还有一段路要走。这不是我们现在考虑的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> A recent run ofstrong hiring reportshave strengthened the case for the Fed to announce at its next meeting, Sept. 21-22, its intentions to start tapering, potentially as soon as its following meeting in November.</p><p><blockquote>最近一系列强劲的招聘报告加强了美联储在 9 月 21 日至 22 日的下次会议上宣布打算开始缩减规模的理由,可能最早在 11 月的下次会议上。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fcf5a9a0b2244055076f521102b5b4a\" tg-width=\"317\" tg-height=\"412\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">“I do expect we are going to be at the point where we’ve seen substantial further progress…probably later this year,” said Chicago Fed President Charles Evans in avirtual roundtable with reporterslast week.</p><p><blockquote>“芝加哥联储主席查尔斯-埃文斯(Charles Evans)上周在与记者的虚拟圆桌会议上说:”我确实预计,我们将看到实质性的进一步进展.可能在今年晚些时候。</blockquote></p><p> Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said in an interview he expected to see by the Sept. 21-22 meeting enough job growth to meet the criteria for reducing bond purchases. “That would set up some time this fall a possible tapering that is dependent on the Delta variant and other variants not slowing down the labor market substantially,” he said in an interview last week. Mr. Rosengren said he hopes that if strong economic growth continues, “we’re done with the tapering program…towards the middle of next year.”</p><p><blockquote>波士顿联储主席埃里克·罗森格伦在接受采访时表示,他预计到 9 月 21 日至 22 日将看到足够的就业增长,以满足减少债券购买的标准。“他在上周接受采访时说:”这将为今年秋季某个时候可能的缩减开工奠定基础,这取决于德尔塔变异毒株和其他不会大幅减缓劳动力市场的变数。罗森格伦先生说,他希望如果经济继续强劲增长,“我们将在明年年中完成缩减计划”。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed wound down its previous bond-buying program very gradually, reducing its purchases over the course of 10 months. But in December 2013, when it announced that it would soon start that process, the economy was weaker, with higher unemployment and low inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美联储非常逐步地结束了之前的债券购买计划,在 10 个月内减少了购买量。但在2013年12月,当它宣布将很快启动这一进程时,经济更加疲软,失业率更高,通货膨胀率更低。</blockquote></p><p> Officials had another reason for caution back then because they were stunned by a surge in long-term Treasury yields, dubbed the “taper tantrum,” that occurred in the middle of 2013, after then-Chair Ben Bernanke suggested they might soon reduce their asset purchases.</p><p><blockquote>当时的官员们还有另一个谨慎的理由,因为他们对 2013 年年中发生的长期国债收益率飙升感到震惊,当时时任主席本-伯南克(Ben Bernanke)暗示他们可能很快就会减少资产购买。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed now finds itself in a very different position. The economy is growing rapidly. Unemployment is much lower, at 5.4% in July.Inflation is much hotter. And bond yields have tumbled this year even as the central bank has discussed plans to reduce bond purchases.</p><p><blockquote>美联储现在发现自己处于一个非常不同的位置。经济正在快速增长。失业率要低得多,7 月份为 5.4%。通货膨胀要高得多。尽管央行讨论了减少债券购买的计划,但今年债券收益率仍大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p> The asset purchases aim to stimulate the economy by holding down long-term interest rates to spur borrowing and spending. Mr. Rosengren pointed to recentsurges in home pricesas evidence that the program may be nearing a point of diminishing returns. “If you can’t get housing materials and you can’t get construction workers to come back on site, but we do increase demand for housing, then it doesn’t do much for our employment mandate—but it does increase housing prices more than it otherwise would,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>资产购买旨在通过压低长期利率来刺激借贷和支出来刺激经济。罗森格伦指出,最近房价飙升证明该计划可能正接近回报递减的临界点。“他说:”如果你得不到住房材料,也得不到建筑工人重返工地,但我们确实增加了住房需求,那么这对我们的就业任务并没有多大帮助,但它确实比其他情况下提高了房价。</blockquote></p><p> Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan agreed. “These purchases are very well designed to stimulate demand, but we don’t have a demand problem,” he said in an interview. “In the aftermath of the Great Recession, we did. So I don’t want to use the playbook from 2009 to 2013.”</p><p><blockquote>达拉斯联储主席罗伯特·卡普兰对此表示同意。“他在接受采访时说:”这些采购旨在刺激需求,但我们没有需求问题。“在大衰退之后,我们做到了。因此,我不想沿用 2009 年至 2013 年的剧本。”</blockquote></p><p> Some other officials have argued for more patience. Fed governor Lael Brainard indicated last month she wanted to see September hiring data, which won’t be available until early October, before deciding. That would hold off any tapering until no sooner than the Fed’s Nov. 2-3 meeting.</p><p><blockquote>其他一些官员主张更有耐心。美联储理事莱尔-布雷纳德(Lael Brainard)上个月表示,她希望看到9月份的招聘数据,而9月份的招聘数据要到10月初才能公布,然后再做决定。这将使任何缩减规模都推迟到美联储 11 月 2 日至 3 日的会议。</blockquote></p><p> San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said in an interview last week she thinks the economy should support “beginning to taper later this year, or maybe next.” Labor markets are “really strong—getting stronger,” she said.</p><p><blockquote>旧金山联储主席玛丽-戴利(Mary Daly)上周在接受采访时表示,她认为经济应该支持 “今年晚些时候,或者明年开始缩减规模”。她说,劳动力市场 “非常强劲,而且越来越强劲”。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Ms. Daly said it was too soon to say how the Fed should reduce the purchases. “Those things haven’t been decided,” she said.</p><p><blockquote>戴利表示,现在说美联储应该如何减少购买量还为时过早。“她说:”这些事情还没有决定。</blockquote></p><p> Likewise, Mr. Evans didn’t say how soon he thought the Fed would need to wind down its purchases. He expects inflation to fall back to 2% by the end of next year, which would argue for less urgency to withdraw monetary stimulus.</p><p><blockquote>同样,埃文斯先生也没有透露他认为美联储需要多久结束购买。他预计明年年底通胀率将回落至2%,这将证明撤回货币刺激的紧迫性有所降低。</blockquote></p><p> “My own outlook is, we’re gonna be more challenged in getting inflation to confidently stay up in the 2% or 2.1% or 2.2%” range, he said. “If others had more confidence that inflation was going to be higher on a sustainable basis, then that…quicker tapering could be the right path.”</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”我自己的展望是,我们将面临更大的挑战,要让通胀率自信地保持在 2%、2.1% 或 2.2% 的范围内。“如果其他人对通胀率会在可持续的基础上走高更有信心,那么.更快地缩减通胀率可能是正确的道路”。</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have yet to decidewhether to reduce their purchasesof Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities at the same pace.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员尚未决定是否以同样的速度减少对美国国债和抵押贷款支持证券的购买。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Rosengren said he would prefer to reduce them monthly by equal quantities. Because the Fed is buying twice as many Treasurys as mortgage-backed securities, that would result in mortgage-bond purchases ending in half the time as Treasury purchases.</p><p><blockquote>罗森格伦先生说,他更愿意每月减少等量的数量。由于美联储购买的国债数量是抵押贷款支持证券的两倍,这将导致抵押贷款债券购买的结束时间是国债购买的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Kaplan said he favors reducing the purchases of both types of bonds over the course of eight months, or by $10 billion for Treasurys and $5 billion for mortgage-backed securities a month. “That strikes me as the most prudent course: start soon, and go gradually, and for me, gradually means eight months,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>卡普兰表示,他赞成在八个月内减少购买这两种债券,即每月减少购买100亿美元的国债和50亿美元的抵押贷款支持证券。“他说:”在我看来,这是最谨慎的做法:尽快开始,循序渐进,对我来说,循序渐进意味着八个月。</blockquote></p><p> St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said he wants to start paring assets in October and conclude the program by March, reducing the purchases of Treasurys by $20 billion a month and mortgage bonds by $10 billion a month. Fed governor Christopher Waller has outlined a similar preference.</p><p><blockquote>圣路易斯联储主席詹姆斯·布拉德表示,他希望从10月份开始削减资产,并在3月份结束该计划,每月减少200亿美元的国债购买,每月减少100亿美元的抵押贷款债券购买。美联储理事克里斯托弗·沃勒也概述了类似的偏好。</blockquote></p><p> Even though “that would be a fairly rapid pullout of the asset-purchase program,” Mr. Bullard said in an interview last week that he thought it would give the Fed more flexibility to determine whether to raise rates later next year. “I don’t want to have to move too rapidly [to raise rates] because it can be very disruptive, so I think that the pace I’m suggesting would give us a lot more optionality in 2022 if we needed to use it.”</p><p><blockquote>尽管 “这将是资产购买计划相当迅速的退出”,但布拉德先生在上周接受采访时表示,他认为这将使美联储有更大的灵活性来决定是否在明年晚些时候加息。“我不想采取太快的行动(提高利率),因为这可能会造成很大的破坏性,所以我认为,如果我们需要在 2022 年使用它,我建议的速度会给我们更多的选择。”</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Kaplan said by reducing asset purchases sooner, the Fed might be able to wait longer before it has to raise interest rates. “By getting a more appropriate stance of monetary policy now or soon, it might actually allow you to be more flexible and be more patient on how you adjust the federal-funds rate down the road,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>卡普兰表示,通过尽快减少资产购买,美联储可能能够在不得不加息之前等待更长时间。“他说:”通过现在或不久采取更合适的货币政策立场,实际上可能会让你在今后如何调整联邦基金利率方面更加灵活和耐心。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Officials Weigh Ending Asset Purchases by Mid-2022<blockquote>美联储官员考虑在 2022 年中期结束资产购买</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Officials Weigh Ending Asset Purchases by Mid-2022<blockquote>美联储官员考虑在 2022 年中期结束资产购买</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Wall Street Journal</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-16 20:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> Reducing bond buying sooner could provide more flexibility to raise interest rates if inflation stays high and unemployment falls rapidly. Federal Reserve officials are nearing agreement to begin scaling back their easy money policies in about three months if the economic recovery continues, with some pushing to end their asset-purchase program by the middle of next year.</p><p><blockquote>如果通胀居高不下、失业率迅速下降,尽快减少债券购买可以为加息提供更大的灵活性。如果经济复苏持续,美联储官员即将同意在大约三个月内开始缩减宽松货币政策,一些官员正在推动在明年年中结束资产购买计划。</blockquote></p><p> In recent interviews and public statements, several have advocated for this timetable, which would enable them to raise interest rates sooner than currently anticipated if the economy makes rapid progress toward their goals.</p><p><blockquote>在最近的采访和公开声明中,一些人主张这一时间表,如果经济在实现其目标方面取得快速进展,这将使他们能够比目前预期的更早加息。</blockquote></p><p> The central bank last December said it would continue the current pace of bond purchases until officials concluded they had achieved “substantial further progress” toward their goals of 2% average inflation and robust employment.</p><p><blockquote>央行去年 12 月表示,将继续保持目前的债券购买速度,直到官员们得出结论,他们在实现平均通胀率 2% 和强劲就业的目标方面取得了 “实质性的进一步进展”。</blockquote></p><p> Officials at their July 27-28 meetingdeliberated on two important questions: when to start paring their monthly purchases of $80 billion in Treasury securities and $40 billion in mortgage securities, and how quickly to reduce, or taper, them. The Fed is set to release on Wednesday minutes of the meeting that could provide further clues about those discussions.</p><p><blockquote>官员们在 7 月 27 日至 28 日的会议上讨论了两个重要问题:何时开始削减每月购买的 800 亿美元国债和 400 亿美元抵押贷款证券,以及如何快速减少或缩减这些资产。美联储将于周三公布会议纪要,这可能会提供有关这些讨论的进一步线索。</blockquote></p><p> The answers are important to financial markets because Fed officials have said they would prefer to conclude the bond-buying program before considering when to raise interest rates from near-zero. At their June 15-16 policy meeting, 13 of 18 Fed officials projected they would raise rates by the end of 2023; seven expected to do so by the end of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>这些答案对金融市场很重要,因为美联储官员表示,他们宁愿在考虑何时从接近于零的利率上调之前结束债券购买计划。在 6 月 15 日至 16 日的政策会议上,18 名美联储官员中有 13 名预计将在 2023 年底前加息;预计到 2022 年底将有 7 家这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said at a July 28 news conference that the Fed was still “a ways away from considering raising interest rates. It’s not something that is on our radar screen right now.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席杰罗姆-鲍威尔(Jerome Powell)在 7 月 28 日的新闻发布会上表示,美联储 “距离考虑加息还有一段路要走。这不是我们现在考虑的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> A recent run ofstrong hiring reportshave strengthened the case for the Fed to announce at its next meeting, Sept. 21-22, its intentions to start tapering, potentially as soon as its following meeting in November.</p><p><blockquote>最近一系列强劲的招聘报告加强了美联储在 9 月 21 日至 22 日的下次会议上宣布打算开始缩减规模的理由,可能最早在 11 月的下次会议上。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6fcf5a9a0b2244055076f521102b5b4a\" tg-width=\"317\" tg-height=\"412\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">“I do expect we are going to be at the point where we’ve seen substantial further progress…probably later this year,” said Chicago Fed President Charles Evans in avirtual roundtable with reporterslast week.</p><p><blockquote>“芝加哥联储主席查尔斯-埃文斯(Charles Evans)上周在与记者的虚拟圆桌会议上说:”我确实预计,我们将看到实质性的进一步进展.可能在今年晚些时候。</blockquote></p><p> Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren said in an interview he expected to see by the Sept. 21-22 meeting enough job growth to meet the criteria for reducing bond purchases. “That would set up some time this fall a possible tapering that is dependent on the Delta variant and other variants not slowing down the labor market substantially,” he said in an interview last week. Mr. Rosengren said he hopes that if strong economic growth continues, “we’re done with the tapering program…towards the middle of next year.”</p><p><blockquote>波士顿联储主席埃里克·罗森格伦在接受采访时表示,他预计到 9 月 21 日至 22 日将看到足够的就业增长,以满足减少债券购买的标准。“他在上周接受采访时说:”这将为今年秋季某个时候可能的缩减开工奠定基础,这取决于德尔塔变异毒株和其他不会大幅减缓劳动力市场的变数。罗森格伦先生说,他希望如果经济继续强劲增长,“我们将在明年年中完成缩减计划”。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed wound down its previous bond-buying program very gradually, reducing its purchases over the course of 10 months. But in December 2013, when it announced that it would soon start that process, the economy was weaker, with higher unemployment and low inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美联储非常逐步地结束了之前的债券购买计划,在 10 个月内减少了购买量。但在2013年12月,当它宣布将很快启动这一进程时,经济更加疲软,失业率更高,通货膨胀率更低。</blockquote></p><p> Officials had another reason for caution back then because they were stunned by a surge in long-term Treasury yields, dubbed the “taper tantrum,” that occurred in the middle of 2013, after then-Chair Ben Bernanke suggested they might soon reduce their asset purchases.</p><p><blockquote>当时的官员们还有另一个谨慎的理由,因为他们对 2013 年年中发生的长期国债收益率飙升感到震惊,当时时任主席本-伯南克(Ben Bernanke)暗示他们可能很快就会减少资产购买。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed now finds itself in a very different position. The economy is growing rapidly. Unemployment is much lower, at 5.4% in July.Inflation is much hotter. And bond yields have tumbled this year even as the central bank has discussed plans to reduce bond purchases.</p><p><blockquote>美联储现在发现自己处于一个非常不同的位置。经济正在快速增长。失业率要低得多,7 月份为 5.4%。通货膨胀要高得多。尽管央行讨论了减少债券购买的计划,但今年债券收益率仍大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p> The asset purchases aim to stimulate the economy by holding down long-term interest rates to spur borrowing and spending. Mr. Rosengren pointed to recentsurges in home pricesas evidence that the program may be nearing a point of diminishing returns. “If you can’t get housing materials and you can’t get construction workers to come back on site, but we do increase demand for housing, then it doesn’t do much for our employment mandate—but it does increase housing prices more than it otherwise would,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>资产购买旨在通过压低长期利率来刺激借贷和支出来刺激经济。罗森格伦指出,最近房价飙升证明该计划可能正接近回报递减的临界点。“他说:”如果你得不到住房材料,也得不到建筑工人重返工地,但我们确实增加了住房需求,那么这对我们的就业任务并没有多大帮助,但它确实比其他情况下提高了房价。</blockquote></p><p> Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan agreed. “These purchases are very well designed to stimulate demand, but we don’t have a demand problem,” he said in an interview. “In the aftermath of the Great Recession, we did. So I don’t want to use the playbook from 2009 to 2013.”</p><p><blockquote>达拉斯联储主席罗伯特·卡普兰对此表示同意。“他在接受采访时说:”这些采购旨在刺激需求,但我们没有需求问题。“在大衰退之后,我们做到了。因此,我不想沿用 2009 年至 2013 年的剧本。”</blockquote></p><p> Some other officials have argued for more patience. Fed governor Lael Brainard indicated last month she wanted to see September hiring data, which won’t be available until early October, before deciding. That would hold off any tapering until no sooner than the Fed’s Nov. 2-3 meeting.</p><p><blockquote>其他一些官员主张更有耐心。美联储理事莱尔-布雷纳德(Lael Brainard)上个月表示,她希望看到9月份的招聘数据,而9月份的招聘数据要到10月初才能公布,然后再做决定。这将使任何缩减规模都推迟到美联储 11 月 2 日至 3 日的会议。</blockquote></p><p> San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said in an interview last week she thinks the economy should support “beginning to taper later this year, or maybe next.” Labor markets are “really strong—getting stronger,” she said.</p><p><blockquote>旧金山联储主席玛丽-戴利(Mary Daly)上周在接受采访时表示,她认为经济应该支持 “今年晚些时候,或者明年开始缩减规模”。她说,劳动力市场 “非常强劲,而且越来越强劲”。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Ms. Daly said it was too soon to say how the Fed should reduce the purchases. “Those things haven’t been decided,” she said.</p><p><blockquote>戴利表示,现在说美联储应该如何减少购买量还为时过早。“她说:”这些事情还没有决定。</blockquote></p><p> Likewise, Mr. Evans didn’t say how soon he thought the Fed would need to wind down its purchases. He expects inflation to fall back to 2% by the end of next year, which would argue for less urgency to withdraw monetary stimulus.</p><p><blockquote>同样,埃文斯先生也没有透露他认为美联储需要多久结束购买。他预计明年年底通胀率将回落至2%,这将证明撤回货币刺激的紧迫性有所降低。</blockquote></p><p> “My own outlook is, we’re gonna be more challenged in getting inflation to confidently stay up in the 2% or 2.1% or 2.2%” range, he said. “If others had more confidence that inflation was going to be higher on a sustainable basis, then that…quicker tapering could be the right path.”</p><p><blockquote>“他说:”我自己的展望是,我们将面临更大的挑战,要让通胀率自信地保持在 2%、2.1% 或 2.2% 的范围内。“如果其他人对通胀率会在可持续的基础上走高更有信心,那么.更快地缩减通胀率可能是正确的道路”。</blockquote></p><p> Fed officials have yet to decidewhether to reduce their purchasesof Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities at the same pace.</p><p><blockquote>美联储官员尚未决定是否以同样的速度减少对美国国债和抵押贷款支持证券的购买。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Rosengren said he would prefer to reduce them monthly by equal quantities. Because the Fed is buying twice as many Treasurys as mortgage-backed securities, that would result in mortgage-bond purchases ending in half the time as Treasury purchases.</p><p><blockquote>罗森格伦先生说,他更愿意每月减少等量的数量。由于美联储购买的国债数量是抵押贷款支持证券的两倍,这将导致抵押贷款债券购买的结束时间是国债购买的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Kaplan said he favors reducing the purchases of both types of bonds over the course of eight months, or by $10 billion for Treasurys and $5 billion for mortgage-backed securities a month. “That strikes me as the most prudent course: start soon, and go gradually, and for me, gradually means eight months,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>卡普兰表示,他赞成在八个月内减少购买这两种债券,即每月减少购买100亿美元的国债和50亿美元的抵押贷款支持证券。“他说:”在我看来,这是最谨慎的做法:尽快开始,循序渐进,对我来说,循序渐进意味着八个月。</blockquote></p><p> St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said he wants to start paring assets in October and conclude the program by March, reducing the purchases of Treasurys by $20 billion a month and mortgage bonds by $10 billion a month. Fed governor Christopher Waller has outlined a similar preference.</p><p><blockquote>圣路易斯联储主席詹姆斯·布拉德表示,他希望从10月份开始削减资产,并在3月份结束该计划,每月减少200亿美元的国债购买,每月减少100亿美元的抵押贷款债券购买。美联储理事克里斯托弗·沃勒也概述了类似的偏好。</blockquote></p><p> Even though “that would be a fairly rapid pullout of the asset-purchase program,” Mr. Bullard said in an interview last week that he thought it would give the Fed more flexibility to determine whether to raise rates later next year. “I don’t want to have to move too rapidly [to raise rates] because it can be very disruptive, so I think that the pace I’m suggesting would give us a lot more optionality in 2022 if we needed to use it.”</p><p><blockquote>尽管 “这将是资产购买计划相当迅速的退出”,但布拉德先生在上周接受采访时表示,他认为这将使美联储有更大的灵活性来决定是否在明年晚些时候加息。“我不想采取太快的行动(提高利率),因为这可能会造成很大的破坏性,所以我认为,如果我们需要在 2022 年使用它,我建议的速度会给我们更多的选择。”</blockquote></p><p> Mr. Kaplan said by reducing asset purchases sooner, the Fed might be able to wait longer before it has to raise interest rates. “By getting a more appropriate stance of monetary policy now or soon, it might actually allow you to be more flexible and be more patient on how you adjust the federal-funds rate down the road,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>卡普兰表示,通过尽快减少资产购买,美联储可能能够在不得不加息之前等待更长时间。“他说:”通过现在或不久采取更合适的货币政策立场,实际上可能会让你在今后如何调整联邦基金利率方面更加灵活和耐心。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-officials-weigh-ending-asset-purchases-by-mid-2022-11629106200\">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-officials-weigh-ending-asset-purchases-by-mid-2022-11629106200","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165935172","content_text":"Reducing bond buying sooner could provide more flexibility to raise interest rates if inflation stays high and unemployment falls rapidly.\n\nFederal Reserve officials are nearing agreement to begin scaling back their easy money policies in about three months if the economic recovery continues, with some pushing to end their asset-purchase program by the middle of next year.\nIn recent interviews and public statements, several have advocated for this timetable, which would enable them to raise interest rates sooner than currently anticipated if the economy makes rapid progress toward their goals.\nThe central bank last December said it would continue the current pace of bond purchases until officials concluded they had achieved “substantial further progress” toward their goals of 2% average inflation and robust employment.\nOfficials at their July 27-28 meetingdeliberated on two important questions: when to start paring their monthly purchases of $80 billion in Treasury securities and $40 billion in mortgage securities, and how quickly to reduce, or taper, them. The Fed is set to release on Wednesday minutes of the meeting that could provide further clues about those discussions.\nThe answers are important to financial markets because Fed officials have said they would prefer to conclude the bond-buying program before considering when to raise interest rates from near-zero. At their June 15-16 policy meeting, 13 of 18 Fed officials projected they would raise rates by the end of 2023; seven expected to do so by the end of 2022.\nFed Chairman Jerome Powell said at a July 28 news conference that the Fed was still “a ways away from considering raising interest rates. It’s not something that is on our radar screen right now.”\nA recent run ofstrong hiring reportshave strengthened the case for the Fed to announce at its next meeting, Sept. 21-22, its intentions to start tapering, potentially as soon as its following meeting in November.\n“I do expect we are going to be at the point where we’ve seen substantial further progress…probably later this year,” said Chicago Fed President Charles Evans in avirtual roundtable with reporterslast week.\nBoston Fed President Eric Rosengren said in an interview he expected to see by the Sept. 21-22 meeting enough job growth to meet the criteria for reducing bond purchases. “That would set up some time this fall a possible tapering that is dependent on the Delta variant and other variants not slowing down the labor market substantially,” he said in an interview last week. Mr. Rosengren said he hopes that if strong economic growth continues, “we’re done with the tapering program…towards the middle of next year.”\nThe Fed wound down its previous bond-buying program very gradually, reducing its purchases over the course of 10 months. But in December 2013, when it announced that it would soon start that process, the economy was weaker, with higher unemployment and low inflation.\nOfficials had another reason for caution back then because they were stunned by a surge in long-term Treasury yields, dubbed the “taper tantrum,” that occurred in the middle of 2013, after then-Chair Ben Bernanke suggested they might soon reduce their asset purchases.\nThe Fed now finds itself in a very different position. The economy is growing rapidly. Unemployment is much lower, at 5.4% in July.Inflation is much hotter. And bond yields have tumbled this year even as the central bank has discussed plans to reduce bond purchases.\nThe asset purchases aim to stimulate the economy by holding down long-term interest rates to spur borrowing and spending. Mr. Rosengren pointed to recentsurges in home pricesas evidence that the program may be nearing a point of diminishing returns. “If you can’t get housing materials and you can’t get construction workers to come back on site, but we do increase demand for housing, then it doesn’t do much for our employment mandate—but it does increase housing prices more than it otherwise would,” he said.\nDallas Fed President Robert Kaplan agreed. “These purchases are very well designed to stimulate demand, but we don’t have a demand problem,” he said in an interview. “In the aftermath of the Great Recession, we did. So I don’t want to use the playbook from 2009 to 2013.”\nSome other officials have argued for more patience. Fed governor Lael Brainard indicated last month she wanted to see September hiring data, which won’t be available until early October, before deciding. That would hold off any tapering until no sooner than the Fed’s Nov. 2-3 meeting.\nSan Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said in an interview last week she thinks the economy should support “beginning to taper later this year, or maybe next.” Labor markets are “really strong—getting stronger,” she said.\nMs. Daly said it was too soon to say how the Fed should reduce the purchases. “Those things haven’t been decided,” she said.\nLikewise, Mr. Evans didn’t say how soon he thought the Fed would need to wind down its purchases. He expects inflation to fall back to 2% by the end of next year, which would argue for less urgency to withdraw monetary stimulus.\n“My own outlook is, we’re gonna be more challenged in getting inflation to confidently stay up in the 2% or 2.1% or 2.2%” range, he said. “If others had more confidence that inflation was going to be higher on a sustainable basis, then that…quicker tapering could be the right path.”\nFed officials have yet to decidewhether to reduce their purchasesof Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities at the same pace.\nMr. Rosengren said he would prefer to reduce them monthly by equal quantities. Because the Fed is buying twice as many Treasurys as mortgage-backed securities, that would result in mortgage-bond purchases ending in half the time as Treasury purchases.\nMr. Kaplan said he favors reducing the purchases of both types of bonds over the course of eight months, or by $10 billion for Treasurys and $5 billion for mortgage-backed securities a month. “That strikes me as the most prudent course: start soon, and go gradually, and for me, gradually means eight months,” he said.\nSt. Louis Fed President James Bullard said he wants to start paring assets in October and conclude the program by March, reducing the purchases of Treasurys by $20 billion a month and mortgage bonds by $10 billion a month. Fed governor Christopher Waller has outlined a similar preference.\nEven though “that would be a fairly rapid pullout of the asset-purchase program,” Mr. Bullard said in an interview last week that he thought it would give the Fed more flexibility to determine whether to raise rates later next year. “I don’t want to have to move too rapidly [to raise rates] because it can be very disruptive, so I think that the pace I’m suggesting would give us a lot more optionality in 2022 if we needed to use it.”\nMr. Kaplan said by reducing asset purchases sooner, the Fed might be able to wait longer before it has to raise interest rates. “By getting a more appropriate stance of monetary policy now or soon, it might actually allow you to be more flexible and be more patient on how you adjust the federal-funds rate down the road,” he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830880403,"gmtCreate":1629044252702,"gmtModify":1631891663477,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good!","listText":"Good!","text":"Good!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/830880403","repostId":"2159145532","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3684,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894962291,"gmtCreate":1628783328113,"gmtModify":1631891663479,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like !","listText":"Like !","text":"Like !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894962291","repostId":"2158189268","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3735,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896127739,"gmtCreate":1628563032521,"gmtModify":1631891663481,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good and like !","listText":"Good and like !","text":"Good and like !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896127739","repostId":"1122543075","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3650,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898539550,"gmtCreate":1628508286570,"gmtModify":1631891663486,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like !","listText":"Like !","text":"Like !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/898539550","repostId":"1122403360","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122403360","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628507058,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1122403360?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-09 19:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Morrisons suitor CD&R gets more time to trump $9.3 billion offer<blockquote>莫里森的追求者 CD&R 有更多时间接受特朗普 93 亿美元的报价</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122403360","media":"Reuters","summary":"LONDON (Reuters) -Morrisons suitor, U.S. private equity group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), has w","content":"<p>LONDON (Reuters) -Morrisons suitor, U.S. private equity group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), has won more time to consider a counter bid to Fortress’ agreed 6.7 billion pounds ($9.3 billion) offer for the British supermarket group.</p><p><blockquote>伦敦(路透社)--莫里森的追求者、美国私募股权集团 Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R) 赢得了更多时间来考虑对 Fortress 同意以 67 亿英镑(93 亿美元)收购这家英国超市集团的还价。</blockquote></p><p> Britain’s Takeover Panel, which regulates corporate takeovers, said on Monday CD&R would have until Aug. 20 to announce a firm intention to make a new offer or walk away, a so-called “put-up or shut-up” order, extending a previous Aug. 9 deadline.</p><p><blockquote>负责监管企业收购的英国收购小组周一表示,CD&R 必须在 8 月 20 日之前宣布提出新收购要约或退出的坚定意向,即所谓的 “要么闭嘴,要么闭嘴 ”令,延长了之前 8 月 9 日的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> The battle for Britain’s fourth-largest grocer after Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Asda, is the most high-profile looming takeover in the country amid a raft of bids and counter bids, reflecting private equity’s appetite for UK Plc.</p><p><blockquote>继特易购、塞恩斯伯里(Sainsbury's)和阿斯达(Asda)之后,英国第四大杂货商的争夺战是英国最引人注目的收购案,在众多的竞购和还价中,这反映了私募股权公司对英国公司的胃口。</blockquote></p><p> Morrisons on Friday approved the raised 272 pence a share offer from the consortium led by Softbank owned Fortress Investment Group - a 52% premium to its share price before takeover interest emerged.</p><p><blockquote>莫里森周五批准了软银旗下 Fortress Investment Group 领导的财团提出的每股 272 便士的要约,比收购兴趣出现前的股价溢价 52%。</blockquote></p><p> The retailer had requested the Takeover Panel set a revised deadline for CD&R.</p><p><blockquote>该零售商已要求收购小组为 CD&R 设定修订后的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> On Friday, Morrisons also adjourned from Aug. 16 to Aug. 27 the shareholder meeting to vote on the Fortress offer. To pass, it would need the support of shareholders representing at least 75% in value of voting investors at the meeting.</p><p><blockquote>周五,莫里森还将股东大会从 8 月 16 日推迟至 8 月 27 日,对 Fortress 要约进行投票。要获得通过,该法案需要得到代表出席会议投票投资者价值至少 75% 的股东的支持。</blockquote></p><p> Shares in Morrisons were trading at nearly 279 pence on Monday - above Fortress’ new offer, indicating investors expect a higher bid.</p><p><blockquote>Morrisons 的股价周一接近 279 便士,高于 Fortress 的新报价,表明投资者预计出价会更高。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have also speculated that U.S. giant Amazon, which has a partnership deal with Morrisons, could still enter the fray.</p><p><blockquote>分析师还猜测,与莫里森达成合作协议的美国巨头亚马逊仍有可能加入这场竞争。</blockquote></p><p> SYNERGIES</p><p><blockquote>协同作用</blockquote></p><p> CD&R, which has former Tesco boss Terry Leahy as a senior adviser, had a 230 pence a share proposal worth 5.52 billion pounds rejected by Morrisons on June 17.</p><p><blockquote>CD&R 的高级顾问是 Tesco 前老板 Terry Leahy,该公司于 6 月 17 日提出的每股 230 便士、价值 55.2 亿英镑的提议被莫里森拒绝。</blockquote></p><p> Last month, Morrisons’ board agreed to Fortress’ 254 pence a share offer worth 6.3 billion pounds but major Morrisons investors Silchester, M&G and JO Hambro all indicated it was too low.</p><p><blockquote>上个月,莫里森的董事会同意了 Fortress 提出的每股 254 便士的报价,价值 63 亿英镑,但莫里森的主要投资者西尔切斯特(Silchester)、M&G 和乔-汉布罗(JO Hambro)都表示报价太低了。</blockquote></p><p> Fortress, which bought British wine seller Majestic Wine in 2019, has said it “remains committed to becoming the new owner of Morrisons.”</p><p><blockquote>Fortress 于 2019 年收购了英国葡萄酒销售商 Majestic Wine,该公司表示 “仍然致力于成为 Morrisons 的新主人”。</blockquote></p><p> The Fortress consortium, which also includes Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Koch Real Estate Investments and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC, has given assurances that it would retain Morrisons’ headquarters in Bradford, northern England, and its existing management team led by Chief Executive David Potts, and execute its existing strategy. Material store sale and leaseback transactions are not planned.</p><p><blockquote>堡垒财团还包括加拿大养老金计划投资委员会、科赫房地产投资公司和新加坡主权财富基金 GIC,该财团已保证将保留莫里森位于英格兰北部布拉德福德的总部及其由首席执行官大卫-波茨(David Potts)领导的现有管理团队,并执行其现有战略。材料商店出售和回租交易没有计划。</blockquote></p><p> People with knowledge of the situation have said CD&R would also be able to tick those boxes to secure a recommendation from Morrisons’ board.</p><p><blockquote>知情人士表示,CD&R 也可以勾选这些方框,以获得莫里森董事会的推荐。</blockquote></p><p> They said CD&R, whose track record includes investment in UK discount retailer B&M, was likely to stress the greater synergies they would get from a deal, given its existing ownership of the Motor Fuel Group petrol forecourt chain.</p><p><blockquote>他们表示,CD&R 的业绩记录包括投资英国折扣零售商 B&M,鉴于其现有拥有汽车燃料集团 petrol forecourt 连锁店,该公司可能会强调他们将从这笔交易中获得更大的协同效应。</blockquote></p><p> However, some analysts have argued that a higher bid makes asset sales more likely.</p><p><blockquote>然而,一些分析师认为,更高的出价使资产出售的可能性更大。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morrisons suitor CD&R gets more time to trump $9.3 billion offer<blockquote>莫里森的追求者 CD&R 有更多时间接受特朗普 93 亿美元的报价</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorrisons suitor CD&R gets more time to trump $9.3 billion offer<blockquote>莫里森的追求者 CD&R 有更多时间接受特朗普 93 亿美元的报价</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-09 19:04</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>LONDON (Reuters) -Morrisons suitor, U.S. private equity group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), has won more time to consider a counter bid to Fortress’ agreed 6.7 billion pounds ($9.3 billion) offer for the British supermarket group.</p><p><blockquote>伦敦(路透社)--莫里森的追求者、美国私募股权集团 Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R) 赢得了更多时间来考虑对 Fortress 同意以 67 亿英镑(93 亿美元)收购这家英国超市集团的还价。</blockquote></p><p> Britain’s Takeover Panel, which regulates corporate takeovers, said on Monday CD&R would have until Aug. 20 to announce a firm intention to make a new offer or walk away, a so-called “put-up or shut-up” order, extending a previous Aug. 9 deadline.</p><p><blockquote>负责监管企业收购的英国收购小组周一表示,CD&R 必须在 8 月 20 日之前宣布提出新收购要约或退出的坚定意向,即所谓的 “要么闭嘴,要么闭嘴 ”令,延长了之前 8 月 9 日的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> The battle for Britain’s fourth-largest grocer after Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Asda, is the most high-profile looming takeover in the country amid a raft of bids and counter bids, reflecting private equity’s appetite for UK Plc.</p><p><blockquote>继特易购、塞恩斯伯里(Sainsbury's)和阿斯达(Asda)之后,英国第四大杂货商的争夺战是英国最引人注目的收购案,在众多的竞购和还价中,这反映了私募股权公司对英国公司的胃口。</blockquote></p><p> Morrisons on Friday approved the raised 272 pence a share offer from the consortium led by Softbank owned Fortress Investment Group - a 52% premium to its share price before takeover interest emerged.</p><p><blockquote>莫里森周五批准了软银旗下 Fortress Investment Group 领导的财团提出的每股 272 便士的要约,比收购兴趣出现前的股价溢价 52%。</blockquote></p><p> The retailer had requested the Takeover Panel set a revised deadline for CD&R.</p><p><blockquote>该零售商已要求收购小组为 CD&R 设定修订后的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> On Friday, Morrisons also adjourned from Aug. 16 to Aug. 27 the shareholder meeting to vote on the Fortress offer. To pass, it would need the support of shareholders representing at least 75% in value of voting investors at the meeting.</p><p><blockquote>周五,莫里森还将股东大会从 8 月 16 日推迟至 8 月 27 日,对 Fortress 要约进行投票。要获得通过,该法案需要得到代表出席会议投票投资者价值至少 75% 的股东的支持。</blockquote></p><p> Shares in Morrisons were trading at nearly 279 pence on Monday - above Fortress’ new offer, indicating investors expect a higher bid.</p><p><blockquote>Morrisons 的股价周一接近 279 便士,高于 Fortress 的新报价,表明投资者预计出价会更高。</blockquote></p><p> Analysts have also speculated that U.S. giant Amazon, which has a partnership deal with Morrisons, could still enter the fray.</p><p><blockquote>分析师还猜测,与莫里森达成合作协议的美国巨头亚马逊仍有可能加入这场竞争。</blockquote></p><p> SYNERGIES</p><p><blockquote>协同作用</blockquote></p><p> CD&R, which has former Tesco boss Terry Leahy as a senior adviser, had a 230 pence a share proposal worth 5.52 billion pounds rejected by Morrisons on June 17.</p><p><blockquote>CD&R 的高级顾问是 Tesco 前老板 Terry Leahy,该公司于 6 月 17 日提出的每股 230 便士、价值 55.2 亿英镑的提议被莫里森拒绝。</blockquote></p><p> Last month, Morrisons’ board agreed to Fortress’ 254 pence a share offer worth 6.3 billion pounds but major Morrisons investors Silchester, M&G and JO Hambro all indicated it was too low.</p><p><blockquote>上个月,莫里森的董事会同意了 Fortress 提出的每股 254 便士的报价,价值 63 亿英镑,但莫里森的主要投资者西尔切斯特(Silchester)、M&G 和乔-汉布罗(JO Hambro)都表示报价太低了。</blockquote></p><p> Fortress, which bought British wine seller Majestic Wine in 2019, has said it “remains committed to becoming the new owner of Morrisons.”</p><p><blockquote>Fortress 于 2019 年收购了英国葡萄酒销售商 Majestic Wine,该公司表示 “仍然致力于成为 Morrisons 的新主人”。</blockquote></p><p> The Fortress consortium, which also includes Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Koch Real Estate Investments and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC, has given assurances that it would retain Morrisons’ headquarters in Bradford, northern England, and its existing management team led by Chief Executive David Potts, and execute its existing strategy. Material store sale and leaseback transactions are not planned.</p><p><blockquote>堡垒财团还包括加拿大养老金计划投资委员会、科赫房地产投资公司和新加坡主权财富基金 GIC,该财团已保证将保留莫里森位于英格兰北部布拉德福德的总部及其由首席执行官大卫-波茨(David Potts)领导的现有管理团队,并执行其现有战略。材料商店出售和回租交易没有计划。</blockquote></p><p> People with knowledge of the situation have said CD&R would also be able to tick those boxes to secure a recommendation from Morrisons’ board.</p><p><blockquote>知情人士表示,CD&R 也可以勾选这些方框,以获得莫里森董事会的推荐。</blockquote></p><p> They said CD&R, whose track record includes investment in UK discount retailer B&M, was likely to stress the greater synergies they would get from a deal, given its existing ownership of the Motor Fuel Group petrol forecourt chain.</p><p><blockquote>他们表示,CD&R 的业绩记录包括投资英国折扣零售商 B&M,鉴于其现有拥有汽车燃料集团 petrol forecourt 连锁店,该公司可能会强调他们将从这笔交易中获得更大的协同效应。</blockquote></p><p> However, some analysts have argued that a higher bid makes asset sales more likely.</p><p><blockquote>然而,一些分析师认为,更高的出价使资产出售的可能性更大。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/morrisons-ma-cdr/update-3-morrisons-suitor-cdr-gets-more-time-to-trump-9-3-bln-offer-idUSL8N2PG0X7\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRWSF":"WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc."},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/morrisons-ma-cdr/update-3-morrisons-suitor-cdr-gets-more-time-to-trump-9-3-bln-offer-idUSL8N2PG0X7","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122403360","content_text":"LONDON (Reuters) -Morrisons suitor, U.S. private equity group Clayton, Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), has won more time to consider a counter bid to Fortress’ agreed 6.7 billion pounds ($9.3 billion) offer for the British supermarket group.\nBritain’s Takeover Panel, which regulates corporate takeovers, said on Monday CD&R would have until Aug. 20 to announce a firm intention to make a new offer or walk away, a so-called “put-up or shut-up” order, extending a previous Aug. 9 deadline.\nThe battle for Britain’s fourth-largest grocer after Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Asda, is the most high-profile looming takeover in the country amid a raft of bids and counter bids, reflecting private equity’s appetite for UK Plc.\nMorrisons on Friday approved the raised 272 pence a share offer from the consortium led by Softbank owned Fortress Investment Group - a 52% premium to its share price before takeover interest emerged.\nThe retailer had requested the Takeover Panel set a revised deadline for CD&R.\nOn Friday, Morrisons also adjourned from Aug. 16 to Aug. 27 the shareholder meeting to vote on the Fortress offer. To pass, it would need the support of shareholders representing at least 75% in value of voting investors at the meeting.\nShares in Morrisons were trading at nearly 279 pence on Monday - above Fortress’ new offer, indicating investors expect a higher bid.\nAnalysts have also speculated that U.S. giant Amazon, which has a partnership deal with Morrisons, could still enter the fray.\nSYNERGIES\nCD&R, which has former Tesco boss Terry Leahy as a senior adviser, had a 230 pence a share proposal worth 5.52 billion pounds rejected by Morrisons on June 17.\nLast month, Morrisons’ board agreed to Fortress’ 254 pence a share offer worth 6.3 billion pounds but major Morrisons investors Silchester, M&G and JO Hambro all indicated it was too low.\nFortress, which bought British wine seller Majestic Wine in 2019, has said it “remains committed to becoming the new owner of Morrisons.”\nThe Fortress consortium, which also includes Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Koch Real Estate Investments and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC, has given assurances that it would retain Morrisons’ headquarters in Bradford, northern England, and its existing management team led by Chief Executive David Potts, and execute its existing strategy. Material store sale and leaseback transactions are not planned.\nPeople with knowledge of the situation have said CD&R would also be able to tick those boxes to secure a recommendation from Morrisons’ board.\nThey said CD&R, whose track record includes investment in UK discount retailer B&M, was likely to stress the greater synergies they would get from a deal, given its existing ownership of the Motor Fuel Group petrol forecourt chain.\nHowever, some analysts have argued that a higher bid makes asset sales more likely.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MRWSF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3716,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891545262,"gmtCreate":1628404149456,"gmtModify":1631891663491,"author":{"id":"3582024918476098","authorId":"3582024918476098","name":"immryan","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582024918476098","idStr":"3582024918476098"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good and like :)","listText":"Good and like :)","text":"Good and like :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891545262","repostId":"1190347839","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3960,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"followers","isTTM":false}