FIZZ流通股少就这么好欺负?

$National Beverage Corp(FIZZ)$实在憋不住了,第一次在老虎发帖。很不爽Maxim group。每次随便一个什么狗屁评级机构发出看空评级,就一通跳水。欺负FIZZ流通盘少吗?难道没发现这两年FIZZ的lacroix增速多快吗?健康饮料大势所趋,连coca cola现在都快顶不住这股趋势要转型了。FIZZ非常像当年的monster高速发展阶段,肤浅的三流投资机构呀。明天的董事会立见高下了,二阶段分红估计很可观,逼死这些大空头。Maxim group什么狗屁评级机构,2016年主推能源股,还叫嚣能翻倍?结果呢?听他的现在都跌成狗了。这是FiZZ的官方回应。今晚开董事会会议,绝对放大招,不是高分红就是业绩爆表!
NATIONAL BEVERAGE CORP. REBUKES MAXIM REPORT FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, May 4, 2017 . . . Maxim Group this morning released a report that National Beverage Corp. (NASDAQ: FIZZ) believes contains self- serving, misguided valuation and flawed analysis. For the benefit of long-term shareholders, the Company proudly releases the following information for its just completed FY 2017:  Revenue of $826 million, up 17% from FY 2016  Net Income of $106 million, up 73%  EPS of $2.27, up 73%  EBITDA* of $174 million, up 66% “Additionally, Maxim also failed to state that if the current administration’s tax proposals are enacted, EPS would increase from $2.27 to $2.94,” stated Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Nick A. Caporella. “I am certain Maxim’s ultimate goal is to create havoc and deliberately misguide investors in order to profit from a short position,” Caporella asserted. “National Beverage is unique – I want to assist those who write about LaCroix and Shasta SDA (soft drink alternative) **re growth prospects and ultimate value, while still maintaining our edge or pathways to our fabulous growth probabilities:
VPO – VPC Dynamics National Beverage employs methods that no other company does in this area – VPO (velocity per outlet) and VPC (velocity per capita). We utilize two proprietary techniques to magnify these measures and this creates growth never before thought possible. Unique to National Beverage is creating velocity per capita through proven velocity predictors. Retailers are amazed by these methods and find before and after changes so dynamic that they demand we afford them the use of these methods as frequently as possible. Shelf Demographics and Marketing Putting the very same products from top to bottom on each and every shelf across our nation is a bad practice and assumes that every unit has exactly the same consumers each and every visit. This is a sure fire failure for the retailer, the consumer and the supplier. So we never do that! But, in all candor . . . most everyone else does. A big edge relative to innovation gives National Beverage a gigantic advantage here. Protocols – Programming and Shelf Marketing Our consumer is so loyal (a cult) that they determine how we conduct business across the entire spectrum of company and geography. We insist that our consumer is satisfied with the lineup of SKU’s and what kind of promotional activities we engage in. This is rewarded by volume increases and which SKU is specifically promoted. The result is our retail partner is assured sales and healthy margins. ACV – Household Penetration Health Insurance – Sugar Tax (7 major cities) There is data that states that sugar is the tobacco of the 70’s and 14% of the population of Mexico is diabetic. When one reads that 94% of American households buy some CSD’s – the fact that more households will stop or convert to healthier beverages is a dynamic fact of truth. Shasta SDA has great potential as the cola category is so very large. When one considers that choices to have a refreshing great-tasting beverage are not plentiful – LaCroix and Shasta SDA are innocent, easily accessible, great choices.

免责声明:上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点,不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

举报

评论7

  • 推荐
  • 最新
  • Tony特别帅
    ·2017-05-05
    哈哈哈,这些机构发看空评级,莫不是配合可口可乐想收购了?
    回复
    举报
    收起
    • 1006
      有道理
      2017-05-05
      回复
      举报
    • Tony特别帅回复1006
      我就是瞎猜,这要有证据证监会还饶的了他们😂
      2017-05-05
      回复
      举报
    • 1006
      这。。。没证据呀
      2017-05-05
      回复
      举报
  • 捷克Jack
    ·2017-05-05
    流通盘少,它涨起来也厉害啊
    楼主该不会是在山顶加的仓?
    回复
    举报
    收起
    • 1006
      没。58的成本,我看到120。只是很不爽这两次跳水都是被一些不入流的评级机构搅局。
      2017-05-05
      回复
      举报
  • 胡久松
    ·2018-03-11
    我是刚接触美股,美股股票背后有庄吗?我不知道,所以问大家
    回复
    举报