个人中心 - 老虎社区

Jsgoh28

IP属地：未知

帖子 · 35帖子 · 35
关注 · 0关注 · 0
粉丝 · 0粉丝 · 0

- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-12-18
  Like
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  3,386 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-12-18
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  3,266 评论
  3
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-22
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  3,571 2
  6
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-22
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,612 评论
  4
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-09
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store<blockquote>苹果寻求推迟放松对 App Store 控制的裁决</blockquote>
  (Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu
  Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store<blockquote>苹果寻求推迟放松对 App Store 控制的裁决</blockquote>
  3,636 2
  3
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-07
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  2,887 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-07
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  4,151 评论
  1
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-07
  Like
  Nvidia Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?<blockquote>英伟达股票：是时候逢低买入了吗？</blockquote>
  Nvidia stock is down 15% from the highs. Should investors buy the dip or wait for a deeper decline?
  Nvidia Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?<blockquote>英伟达股票：是时候逢低买入了吗？</blockquote>
  3,237 3
  6
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-10-07
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  非常抱歉，此主贴已删除
  3,180 评论
  4
  分享
  举报
- Jsgoh28Jsgoh28
  ·2021-09-28
  Like
  Despite Record Cargo Backlogs, Ports Of L.A. And Long Beach Still Don't Operate Around The Clock<blockquote>尽管货物积压创纪录，洛杉矶和长滩港口仍然无法全天候运营</blockquote>
  Some of the busiest U.S. ports, including many in California, are still struggling with how to deal
  Despite Record Cargo Backlogs, Ports Of L.A. And Long Beach Still Don't Operate Around The Clock<blockquote>尽管货物积压创纪录，洛杉矶和长滩港口仍然无法全天候运营</blockquote>
  2,258 评论
  3
  分享
  举报

热议股票

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3575601609818315","uuid":"3575601609818315","gmtCreate":1622962301505,"gmtModify":1623464359653,"name":"Jsgoh28","pinyin":"jsgoh28","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":232,"tweetSize":35,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.14%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.02.20","exceedPercentage":"60.59%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":699631444,"gmtCreate":1639789735916,"gmtModify":1639789735985,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699631444","repostId":"2192597562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":699631667,"gmtCreate":1639789727781,"gmtModify":1639789727873,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/699631667","repostId":"2192597562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3266,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851908995,"gmtCreate":1634862172463,"gmtModify":1634862172570,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851908995","repostId":"1158056981","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3571,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":851903619,"gmtCreate":1634862084268,"gmtModify":1634862100733,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/851903619","repostId":"2177462128","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":821290386,"gmtCreate":1633745007140,"gmtModify":1633745755401,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/821290386","repostId":"1198772378","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198772378","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633741203,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198772378?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-09 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store<blockquote>苹果寻求推迟放松对 App Store 控制的裁决</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198772378","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store bu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p><p><blockquote>（彭博社）——苹果公司正努力推迟对其 App Store 商业模式进行自 2008 年推出该平台以来最重大的变革，这一改革每年可能会让这家科技巨头损失数十亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p><p><blockquote>这家 iPhone 制造商周五发出通知，将对法官在与 Epic Games Inc.它还要求法官在上诉期间搁置 12 月 9 日 App Store 规则变更的最后期限，如果允许，苹果的业务可能会照常进行至少一年。</blockquote></p><p> The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p><p><blockquote>9 月 10 日的裁决在很大程度上证明了苹果向开发者收取 App Store 交易佣金的商业模式是正确的，但法官表示，苹果必须允许用户和应用开发者之间直接沟通，并允许链接到网络以完成交易。</blockquote></p><p> Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p><p><blockquote>彭博资讯表示，苹果面临降低佣金的压力（目前佣金高达 30%），在最坏的情况下，可能会使收入减少 20 亿至 40 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在文件中表示，它希望 “维持现状”，因为在上诉过程中 “没有理由在 App Store 的更改上花费资源 ”。它还认为，如果法官的命令于 12 月 9 日生效，可能会 “给消费者和 iOS 平台带来意想不到的下游后果”。苹果说，推迟将给该公司时间来解决担忧，这种方式可能会消除让开发商允许消费者进行网上购物的需要。</blockquote></p><p> “Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p><p><blockquote>“该公司表示：”在不断变化的世界中，苹果正在努力解决这些难题，在不影响消费者体验的情况下增强信息流动。</blockquote></p><p> A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果留任请求的听证会定于 11 月 16 日举行，但该公司在一份简报中表示，它正在寻求将听证会推迟到 11 月 2 日。苹果表示，如果美国地区法官 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 拒绝批准暂缓执行，该公司可以向第九巡回上诉法院提起上诉。</blockquote></p><p> When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p><p><blockquote>经过 5 月份为期三周的审判，裁决出来后，苹果称赞这是一次胜利，因为法官没有认定该公司违反了联邦反垄断法。Epic 的创始人兼首席执行官蒂姆-斯威尼（Tim Sweeney）在推特上说，“这一裁决对开发商和消费者来说都不是胜利”，他的公司立即提交了上诉通知。</blockquote></p><p> Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p><p><blockquote>Epic 周五拒绝就苹果的上诉发表评论，但斯威尼在推特上发布了一张皮利特工的图片，皮利特工是 Epic 热门大逃杀游戏《堡垒之夜》中的一名香蕉动作角色，在审判中短暂成为争议的焦点。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p><blockquote>苹果宣布，它计划将堡垒之夜从应用商店中移除，直到上诉用尽，如果这场斗争一直打到美国最高法院，这一过程可能需要长达五年的时间。</blockquote></p><p> While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p><p><blockquote>虽然 Gonzalez Rogers 说苹果不能再禁止开发者绕过 App Store 的应用内购买系统，将用户引向网络以完成交易，但法官并没有直接声明苹果不能收取佣金。</blockquote></p><p> That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p><p><blockquote>这导致一些观察人士认为，苹果仍然可以通过其他方式减少收入，但律师和分析师表示，这样做会造成后勤障碍，并面临政治反弹的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p><p><blockquote>Cowen &amp; Co. 分析师 Paul Gallant 表示，苹果希望推迟改变 App Store 规则，“因为如果开发者从 12 月开始采取变通办法，事情可能会变得一团糟”。加兰特在上个月的一份研究报告中表示，苹果很有可能赢得第九巡回法院的留任。</blockquote></p><p> “That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道：”这将至少在 2022 年底之前阻止开发商使用非苹果支付机制（并避免 30% 的佣金）。</blockquote></p><p> Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p><p><blockquote>在 9 月份做出裁决之前，苹果在与美国小型开发商和日本联邦贸易委员会的和解中宣布了两项 App Store 变更。这两项让步都与法院的禁令类似。</blockquote></p><p> Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p><p><blockquote>苹果允许开发者直接与用户沟通替代支付方式，明年还将开始允许所谓的 “阅读器 ”应用程序--处理视频、照片和新闻等媒体的应用程序--将用户引向网络订阅，绕过苹果的费用。该公司在周五的文件中强调了这些变化。</blockquote></p><p> The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p><p><blockquote>该案是Epic Games Inc.诉苹果公司，20-cv-05640，美国加州北区地方法院。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store<blockquote>苹果寻求推迟放松对 App Store 控制的裁决</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Seeks to Delay Ruling Loosening Its Grip on App Store<blockquote>苹果寻求推迟放松对 App Store 控制的裁决</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Bloomberg</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-09 09:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.</p><p><blockquote>（彭博社）——苹果公司正努力推迟对其 App Store 商业模式进行自 2008 年推出该平台以来最重大的变革，这一改革每年可能会让这家科技巨头损失数十亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> The iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.</p><p><blockquote>这家 iPhone 制造商周五发出通知，将对法官在与 Epic Games Inc.它还要求法官在上诉期间搁置 12 月 9 日 App Store 规则变更的最后期限，如果允许，苹果的业务可能会照常进行至少一年。</blockquote></p><p> The Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.</p><p><blockquote>9 月 10 日的裁决在很大程度上证明了苹果向开发者收取 App Store 交易佣金的商业模式是正确的，但法官表示，苹果必须允许用户和应用开发者之间直接沟通，并允许链接到网络以完成交易。</blockquote></p><p> Bloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.</p><p><blockquote>彭博资讯表示，苹果面临降低佣金的压力（目前佣金高达 30%），在最坏的情况下，可能会使收入减少 20 亿至 40 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在文件中表示，它希望 “维持现状”，因为在上诉过程中 “没有理由在 App Store 的更改上花费资源 ”。它还认为，如果法官的命令于 12 月 9 日生效，可能会 “给消费者和 iOS 平台带来意想不到的下游后果”。苹果说，推迟将给该公司时间来解决担忧，这种方式可能会消除让开发商允许消费者进行网上购物的需要。</blockquote></p><p> “Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.</p><p><blockquote>“该公司表示：”在不断变化的世界中，苹果正在努力解决这些难题，在不影响消费者体验的情况下增强信息流动。</blockquote></p><p> A hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p><p><blockquote>关于苹果留任请求的听证会定于 11 月 16 日举行，但该公司在一份简报中表示，它正在寻求将听证会推迟到 11 月 2 日。苹果表示，如果美国地区法官 Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 拒绝批准暂缓执行，该公司可以向第九巡回上诉法院提起上诉。</blockquote></p><p> When the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.</p><p><blockquote>经过 5 月份为期三周的审判，裁决出来后，苹果称赞这是一次胜利，因为法官没有认定该公司违反了联邦反垄断法。Epic 的创始人兼首席执行官蒂姆-斯威尼（Tim Sweeney）在推特上说，“这一裁决对开发商和消费者来说都不是胜利”，他的公司立即提交了上诉通知。</blockquote></p><p> Epic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.</p><p><blockquote>Epic 周五拒绝就苹果的上诉发表评论，但斯威尼在推特上发布了一张皮利特工的图片，皮利特工是 Epic 热门大逃杀游戏《堡垒之夜》中的一名香蕉动作角色，在审判中短暂成为争议的焦点。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.</p><p><blockquote>苹果宣布，它计划将堡垒之夜从应用商店中移除，直到上诉用尽，如果这场斗争一直打到美国最高法院，这一过程可能需要长达五年的时间。</blockquote></p><p> While Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.</p><p><blockquote>虽然 Gonzalez Rogers 说苹果不能再禁止开发者绕过 App Store 的应用内购买系统，将用户引向网络以完成交易，但法官并没有直接声明苹果不能收取佣金。</blockquote></p><p> That has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.</p><p><blockquote>这导致一些观察人士认为，苹果仍然可以通过其他方式减少收入，但律师和分析师表示，这样做会造成后勤障碍，并面临政治反弹的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Paul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen &amp; Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.</p><p><blockquote>Cowen &amp; Co. 分析师 Paul Gallant 表示，苹果希望推迟改变 App Store 规则，“因为如果开发者从 12 月开始采取变通办法，事情可能会变得一团糟”。加兰特在上个月的一份研究报告中表示，苹果很有可能赢得第九巡回法院的留任。</blockquote></p><p> “That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.</p><p><blockquote>“他写道：”这将至少在 2022 年底之前阻止开发商使用非苹果支付机制（并避免 30% 的佣金）。</blockquote></p><p> Before the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.</p><p><blockquote>在 9 月份做出裁决之前，苹果在与美国小型开发商和日本联邦贸易委员会的和解中宣布了两项 App Store 变更。这两项让步都与法院的禁令类似。</blockquote></p><p> Apple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.</p><p><blockquote>苹果允许开发者直接与用户沟通替代支付方式，明年还将开始允许所谓的 “阅读器 ”应用程序--处理视频、照片和新闻等媒体的应用程序--将用户引向网络订阅，绕过苹果的费用。该公司在周五的文件中强调了这些变化。</blockquote></p><p> The case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).</p><p><blockquote>该案是Epic Games Inc.诉苹果公司，20-cv-05640，美国加州北区地方法院。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html\">Bloomberg</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-seeks-delay-ruling-loosening-230855311.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198772378","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. is angling to delay making the most significant change to its App Store business model since the platform was launched in 2008, an overhaul that could cost the tech giant a few billion dollars annually.\nThe iPhone maker gave notice Friday that will appeal a judge’s ruling in its fight with Epic Games Inc. ordering the Cupertino, California-based company to stop blocking developers from letting users complete in-app purchases on the web. It also asked the judge to put her Dec. 9 deadline for App Store rule changes on hold during the appeal, which if allowed could keep business as usual for Apple for at least a year.\nThe Sept. 10 ruling largely vindicated Apple’s business model that charges commissions on developers for App Store transactions, but the judge said Apple must allow direct communication between users and app makers and permit links to the web to complete transactions.\nBloomberg Intelligence has said that pressure on Apple to lower its commissions, which currently run as high as 30%, could squeeze revenue by $2 billion to $4 billion in a worst-case scenario.\nApple said in its filing that it wants to “maintain the status quo” as “there’s no reason to expend resources” on App Store changes during the appeals process. It also argued there could be “unintended downstream consequences for consumers and the iOS platform” if the judge’s order goes into effect Dec. 9. A postponement would give the company time to address concerns in a way that could potentially do away with the need to let developers allow consumers to make web purchases, Apple said.\n“Apple is working hard to address these difficult issues in a changing world, enhancing information flow without compromising the consumer experience,” the company said.\nA hearing on Apple’s stay request has been set for Nov. 16, but the company said in a briefing it’s seeking to move the proceeding to Nov. 2. If U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers refuses to grant the stay, Apple said, the company could go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nWhen the ruling came out, following a three-week trial in May, Apple hailed it as a victory because the judge didn’t find that the company violated federal antitrust law. Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder and chief executive officer, said in a tweet “the ruling isn’t a win for developers or for consumers” and his company promptly filed notice that it will appeal.\nEpic declined to comment on Apple’s appeal Friday but Sweeney tweeted an image of Agent Peely, a banana action figure in Epic’s popular battle-royale game Fortnite who briefly became a source of controversy in the trial.\nApple has announced that it plans to keep Fortnite off of the App Store until appeals are exhausted, a process that could take as long as five years if the fight goes all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.\nWhile Gonzalez Rogers said Apple can no longer ban developers from pointing users to the web to complete transactions -- bypassing the App Store’s in-app-purchase system -- the judge didn’t state outright that Apple can’t collect its commissions.\nThat has led some observers to believe that Apple could still take its cut of revenue via other means, but lawyers and analysts say doing so poses logistical hurdles and risks political blowback.\nPaul Gallant, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has said Apple would want to put off changing App Store rules “because things could get messy if developers get to do workarounds starting in December.” Gallant said in a research note last month that Apple has a good chance of winning a stay at the Ninth Circuit.\n“That would prevent developers from using non-Apple payment mechanisms (and avoiding the 30% commission) until at least late 2022,” he wrote.\nBefore the September ruling, Apple announced two App Store changes in settlements with small U.S. developers and the Japan Federal Trade Commission. Both concessions are similar to the court’s injunction.\nApple is letting developers directly communicate with users about alternative payment methods, and next year it will begin allowing so-called “reader” apps -- those that deal with media like video, photos, and news -- to point users to the web to subscribe, bypassing Apple’s fees. The company highlighted those changes in Friday’s filing.\nThe case is Epic Games Inc. v. Apple Inc., 20-cv-05640, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3636,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823050110,"gmtCreate":1633566714661,"gmtModify":1633566714799,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823050110","repostId":"1199147186","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2887,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823050976,"gmtCreate":1633566705481,"gmtModify":1633566705615,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823050976","repostId":"1199147186","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823027993,"gmtCreate":1633566658159,"gmtModify":1633566658266,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823027993","repostId":"1153928685","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153928685","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633566024,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1153928685?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-07 08:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?<blockquote>英伟达股票：是时候逢低买入了吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153928685","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Nvidia stock is down 15% from the highs. Should investors buy the dip or wait for a deeper decline? ","content":"<p>Nvidia stock is down 15% from the highs. Should investors buy the dip or wait for a deeper decline? Let's look at the chart.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达股价较高点下跌 15%。投资者应该逢低买入还是等待更深层次的下跌？让我们看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia&nbsp;is not just one of the top tech stocks to buy; it has been one of the best stocks overall.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达不仅是最值得买入的科技股之一；总体而言，它是最好的股票之一。</blockquote></p><p> It boasts robust long-term performance and has outpaced many of its peers this year, big and small.</p><p><blockquote>它拥有强劲的长期表现，今年已经超过了许多大大小小的同行。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia’s 57% year-to-date gains trounce Advanced Micro Devices, which is up 11.75% this year and 25% over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Nvidia 今年迄今为止的涨幅为 57%，超过了 Advanced Micro Devices，后者今年上涨了 11.75%，过去 12 个月上涨了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> It tops the FAANG group, although Alphabet&nbsp;is close, up 56% so far this year. The next-best performer in the group is up 22%.</p><p><blockquote>它高于 FAANG 集团，尽管Alphabet紧随其后，今年迄今已上涨 56%。该组中表现第二好的公司上涨了 22%。</blockquote></p><p> In my view, Nvidia remains one of the best large-cap growth stocks available to investors.It also remains a top pick among analysts.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，英伟达仍然是投资者可以选择的最佳大型成长型股票之一。它也仍然是分析师的首选。</blockquote></p><p> That’s even as it&nbsp;faces regulatory issues&nbsp;with its acquisition of Arm. It’s also as the shares are down about 15% from the highs. Let’s look at the chart.</p><p><blockquote>尽管它在收购 Arm 时面临着监管问题。这也是因为股价较高点下跌了约 15%。让我们看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Nvidia Stock</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易英伟达股票</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d4b4647632b8616e9204a51feb8b414\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"766\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Nvidia stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>英伟达股票日线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Notice, on the first half of this chart, just how much consolidating Nvidia stock was doing. Despite its great earnings, impressive conferences, raised guidance and a stock split, Wall Street simply wasn’t willing to reward the stock.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，在这张图表的前半部分，Nvidia 股票的整合程度如何。尽管华尔街取得了丰厚的收益、令人印象深刻的会议、上调的指引和股票分割，但华尔街就是不愿意奖励这只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Granted, it had rallied hard off the Covid lows, but the lack of a lasting reward in the form of well-deserved rally was deflating for the bulls.</p><p><blockquote>诚然，它已经从Covid低点强劲反弹，但缺乏当之无愧的反弹形式的持久回报对多头来说是通货紧缩的。</blockquote></p><p> That changed in late May, when Nvidia&nbsp;reported better-than-expected results— again.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况在五月下旬发生了变化，当时英伟达再次公布了好于预期的业绩。</blockquote></p><p> It ignited a move from sub-$140 to the $208 to $210 area. This zone became important, as it was a major breakout level in August.</p><p><blockquote>它引发了从 140 美元以下到 208 美元至 210 美元区域的移动。这个区域变得很重要，因为它是8月份的一个主要突破水平。</blockquote></p><p> That breakout helped propel the move to $230, which became resistance, while the $208 to $210 zone was initially support on the recent dip. However, that level failed as support last week.</p><p><blockquote>这一突破有助于推动价格向 230 美元移动，这成为阻力位，而 208 美元至 210 美元区域最初是最近下跌的支撑位。然而，该水平上周未能作为支撑。</blockquote></p><p> On the upside, bulls need to see Nvidia stock reclaim the $208 to $210 area, as well as the 10-day and 50-day moving averages. That puts the 21-day moving average in play, followed by $220, then resistance at $230.</p><p><blockquote>从好的方面来看，多头需要看到英伟达股价收复 208 美元至 210 美元区域，以及 10 天和 50 天移动平均线。这使得 21 天移动平均线发挥作用，其次是 220 美元，然后是 230 美元的阻力位。</blockquote></p><p> On the downside, bulls don’t want to see Nvidia stock lose the 21-week moving average. Below it puts this week’s low in play at $195.55.</p><p><blockquote>不利的一面是，多头不希望看到英伟达股价失去 21 周移动平均线。低于此，本周最低点为 195.55 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Should Nvidia close below that level, it opens the door to the weekly VWAP measure near $184, followed by the $178 to $180 zone.</p><p><blockquote>如果英伟达收盘价低于该水平，它将为每周 VWAP 指标打开大门，接近 184 美元，随后是 178 美元至 180 美元区域。</blockquote></p><p> I love this company, but it’s not an easy trade from here.</p><p><blockquote>我喜欢这家公司，但在这里做交易并不容易。</blockquote></p><p> Failure to reclaim some of these key levels should have investors looking to buy the dip — which is a potentially larger dip should this week’s low fail to hold.</p><p><blockquote>如果未能收复其中一些关键水平，投资者应该会寻求逢低买入--如果本周的低点未能守住，跌幅可能会更大。</blockquote></p><p> Otherwise, the shares can run if they close back over the 50-day moving average.</p><p><blockquote>否则，如果收盘价回到 50 天移动平均线上方，股价可能会上涨。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?<blockquote>英伟达股票：是时候逢低买入了吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia Stock: Is It Time to Buy the Dip?<blockquote>英伟达股票：是时候逢低买入了吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-07 08:20</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Nvidia stock is down 15% from the highs. Should investors buy the dip or wait for a deeper decline? Let's look at the chart.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达股价较高点下跌 15%。投资者应该逢低买入还是等待更深层次的下跌？让我们看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia&nbsp;is not just one of the top tech stocks to buy; it has been one of the best stocks overall.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达不仅是最值得买入的科技股之一；总体而言，它是最好的股票之一。</blockquote></p><p> It boasts robust long-term performance and has outpaced many of its peers this year, big and small.</p><p><blockquote>它拥有强劲的长期表现，今年已经超过了许多大大小小的同行。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia’s 57% year-to-date gains trounce Advanced Micro Devices, which is up 11.75% this year and 25% over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Nvidia 今年迄今为止的涨幅为 57%，超过了 Advanced Micro Devices，后者今年上涨了 11.75%，过去 12 个月上涨了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> It tops the FAANG group, although Alphabet&nbsp;is close, up 56% so far this year. The next-best performer in the group is up 22%.</p><p><blockquote>它高于 FAANG 集团，尽管Alphabet紧随其后，今年迄今已上涨 56%。该组中表现第二好的公司上涨了 22%。</blockquote></p><p> In my view, Nvidia remains one of the best large-cap growth stocks available to investors.It also remains a top pick among analysts.</p><p><blockquote>在我看来，英伟达仍然是投资者可以选择的最佳大型成长型股票之一。它也仍然是分析师的首选。</blockquote></p><p> That’s even as it&nbsp;faces regulatory issues&nbsp;with its acquisition of Arm. It’s also as the shares are down about 15% from the highs. Let’s look at the chart.</p><p><blockquote>尽管它在收购 Arm 时面临着监管问题。这也是因为股价较高点下跌了约 15%。让我们看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Nvidia Stock</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易英伟达股票</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d4b4647632b8616e9204a51feb8b414\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"766\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Nvidia stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>英伟达股票日线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Notice, on the first half of this chart, just how much consolidating Nvidia stock was doing. Despite its great earnings, impressive conferences, raised guidance and a stock split, Wall Street simply wasn’t willing to reward the stock.</p><p><blockquote>请注意，在这张图表的前半部分，Nvidia 股票的整合程度如何。尽管华尔街取得了丰厚的收益、令人印象深刻的会议、上调的指引和股票分割，但华尔街就是不愿意奖励这只股票。</blockquote></p><p> Granted, it had rallied hard off the Covid lows, but the lack of a lasting reward in the form of well-deserved rally was deflating for the bulls.</p><p><blockquote>诚然，它已经从Covid低点强劲反弹，但缺乏当之无愧的反弹形式的持久回报对多头来说是通货紧缩的。</blockquote></p><p> That changed in late May, when Nvidia&nbsp;reported better-than-expected results— again.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况在五月下旬发生了变化，当时英伟达再次公布了好于预期的业绩。</blockquote></p><p> It ignited a move from sub-$140 to the $208 to $210 area. This zone became important, as it was a major breakout level in August.</p><p><blockquote>它引发了从 140 美元以下到 208 美元至 210 美元区域的移动。这个区域变得很重要，因为它是8月份的一个主要突破水平。</blockquote></p><p> That breakout helped propel the move to $230, which became resistance, while the $208 to $210 zone was initially support on the recent dip. However, that level failed as support last week.</p><p><blockquote>这一突破有助于推动价格向 230 美元移动，这成为阻力位，而 208 美元至 210 美元区域最初是最近下跌的支撑位。然而，该水平上周未能作为支撑。</blockquote></p><p> On the upside, bulls need to see Nvidia stock reclaim the $208 to $210 area, as well as the 10-day and 50-day moving averages. That puts the 21-day moving average in play, followed by $220, then resistance at $230.</p><p><blockquote>从好的方面来看，多头需要看到英伟达股价收复 208 美元至 210 美元区域，以及 10 天和 50 天移动平均线。这使得 21 天移动平均线发挥作用，其次是 220 美元，然后是 230 美元的阻力位。</blockquote></p><p> On the downside, bulls don’t want to see Nvidia stock lose the 21-week moving average. Below it puts this week’s low in play at $195.55.</p><p><blockquote>不利的一面是，多头不希望看到英伟达股价失去 21 周移动平均线。低于此，本周最低点为 195.55 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Should Nvidia close below that level, it opens the door to the weekly VWAP measure near $184, followed by the $178 to $180 zone.</p><p><blockquote>如果英伟达收盘价低于该水平，它将为每周 VWAP 指标打开大门，接近 184 美元，随后是 178 美元至 180 美元区域。</blockquote></p><p> I love this company, but it’s not an easy trade from here.</p><p><blockquote>我喜欢这家公司，但在这里做交易并不容易。</blockquote></p><p> Failure to reclaim some of these key levels should have investors looking to buy the dip — which is a potentially larger dip should this week’s low fail to hold.</p><p><blockquote>如果未能收复其中一些关键水平，投资者应该会寻求逢低买入--如果本周的低点未能守住，跌幅可能会更大。</blockquote></p><p> Otherwise, the shares can run if they close back over the 50-day moving average.</p><p><blockquote>否则，如果收盘价回到 50 天移动平均线上方，股价可能会上涨。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/how-to-trade-nvidia-stock-after-decline-october-2021\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/how-to-trade-nvidia-stock-after-decline-october-2021","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153928685","content_text":"Nvidia stock is down 15% from the highs. Should investors buy the dip or wait for a deeper decline? Let's look at the chart.\nNvidia is not just one of the top tech stocks to buy; it has been one of the best stocks overall.\nIt boasts robust long-term performance and has outpaced many of its peers this year, big and small.\nNvidia’s 57% year-to-date gains trounce Advanced Micro Devices, which is up 11.75% this year and 25% over the past 12 months.\nIt tops the FAANG group, although Alphabet is close, up 56% so far this year. The next-best performer in the group is up 22%.\nIn my view, Nvidia remains one of the best large-cap growth stocks available to investors.It also remains a top pick among analysts.\nThat’s even as it faces regulatory issues with its acquisition of Arm. It’s also as the shares are down about 15% from the highs. Let’s look at the chart.\nTrading Nvidia Stock\nDaily chart of Nvidia stock.\nNotice, on the first half of this chart, just how much consolidating Nvidia stock was doing. Despite its great earnings, impressive conferences, raised guidance and a stock split, Wall Street simply wasn’t willing to reward the stock.\nGranted, it had rallied hard off the Covid lows, but the lack of a lasting reward in the form of well-deserved rally was deflating for the bulls.\nThat changed in late May, when Nvidia reported better-than-expected results— again.\nIt ignited a move from sub-$140 to the $208 to $210 area. This zone became important, as it was a major breakout level in August.\nThat breakout helped propel the move to $230, which became resistance, while the $208 to $210 zone was initially support on the recent dip. However, that level failed as support last week.\nOn the upside, bulls need to see Nvidia stock reclaim the $208 to $210 area, as well as the 10-day and 50-day moving averages. That puts the 21-day moving average in play, followed by $220, then resistance at $230.\nOn the downside, bulls don’t want to see Nvidia stock lose the 21-week moving average. Below it puts this week’s low in play at $195.55.\nShould Nvidia close below that level, it opens the door to the weekly VWAP measure near $184, followed by the $178 to $180 zone.\nI love this company, but it’s not an easy trade from here.\nFailure to reclaim some of these key levels should have investors looking to buy the dip — which is a potentially larger dip should this week’s low fail to hold.\nOtherwise, the shares can run if they close back over the 50-day moving average.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3237,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":823025714,"gmtCreate":1633566610069,"gmtModify":1633566610231,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/823025714","repostId":"2173948202","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":866526141,"gmtCreate":1632792059583,"gmtModify":1632797578517,"author":{"id":"3575601609818315","authorId":"3575601609818315","name":"Jsgoh28","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90196128a465db6b3437dd55043048f8","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575601609818315","idStr":"3575601609818315"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/866526141","repostId":"1154590665","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154590665","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1632790801,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154590665?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-28 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Despite Record Cargo Backlogs, Ports Of L.A. And Long Beach Still Don't Operate Around The Clock<blockquote>尽管货物积压创纪录，洛杉矶和长滩港口仍然无法全天候运营</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154590665","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Some of the busiest U.S. ports, including many in California, are still struggling with how to deal ","content":"<p>Some of the busiest U.S. ports, including many in California, are still struggling with how to deal with significant cargo backlogs.</p><p><blockquote>美国一些最繁忙的港口，包括加利福尼亚州的许多港口，仍在努力应对大量货物积压。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, despite the backlog, the busiest U.S. port still shuts down for hours on most days and is closed on Sundays,the Wall Street Journal reports. \"Tens of thousands\" of containers remain stuck at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. More than 60 ships are lined up to dock, the report says.</p><p><blockquote>然而，据《华尔街日报》报道，尽管积压，美国最繁忙的港口在大多数日子里仍然关闭数小时，周日也关闭。“数万”集装箱仍滞留在洛杉矶和长滩港口。报道称，60多艘船排队停靠码头。</blockquote></p><p> More than 25% of all American imports pass through one of the two ports. LA and Long Beach collectively manage 13 private container terminals. Long Beach officials finally said last week they would try operating 24 hours a day between Monday and Thursday. LA says it's going to keep existing hours and wait for the rest of the supply chain to extend their hours first.</p><p><blockquote>超过25%的美国进口商品通过这两个港口之一。洛杉矶和长滩共同管理着13个私人集装箱码头。长滩官员上周终于表示，他们将尝试在周一至周四之间每天24小时运营。洛杉矶表示，将保持现有工作时间，并等待供应链的其他部分先延长工作时间。</blockquote></p><p> Gene Seroka, executive director of the larger Port of Los Angeles, said: “It has been nearly impossible to get everyone on the same page towards 24/7 operations.”</p><p><blockquote>洛杉矶较大港口的执行董事吉恩·塞罗卡(Gene Seroka)表示：“几乎不可能让每个人都在24/7运营方面达成一致。”</blockquote></p><p> Ports in places like Asia and Europe, for contrast, have operated around the clock \"for years\", the report notes.</p><p><blockquote>报告指出，相比之下，亚洲和欧洲等地的港口“多年来”一直在全天候运营。</blockquote></p><p> Uffe Ostergaard, president of the North America region for German boxship operator Hapag-Lloyd AG said: “With the current work schedule you have two big ports operating at 60%-70% of their capacity. That’s a huge operational disadvantage.”</p><p><blockquote>德国集装箱船运营商赫伯罗特股份公司北美地区总裁Uffe Ostergaard表示：“按照目前的工作时间表，两个大型港口的运营能力为60%-70%。这是一个巨大的运营劣势。”</blockquote></p><p> As the shortage continues, all members of the supply chain including truckers, warehouse operators and railways, are blaming each other for the shortages of products. All parts of the supply chain are also struggling with a shortage of labor.</p><p><blockquote>随着短缺的持续，供应链的所有成员，包括卡车司机、仓库运营商和铁路，都在互相指责产品短缺。供应链的各个部分也都在与劳动力短缺作斗争。</blockquote></p><p> A longshore shift at either of the two ports used to be either 8AM to 4PM or 6PM to 3AM. Overnight shifts of 5 hours were \"rarely used\" because they are up to 50% more expensive, the report says.</p><p><blockquote>这两个港口的码头班次过去是上午8点至下午4点或下午6点至凌晨3点。报告称，5小时的夜班“很少使用”，因为它们的费用高达50%。</blockquote></p><p> The International Longshore and Warehouse Union says their members will work a third shift, but only after the pileup of containers is fetched out of the port so there is space.</p><p><blockquote>国际码头和仓库联盟表示，他们的成员将进行第三班工作，但前提是堆积如山的集装箱被运出港口，以便有空间。</blockquote></p><p> Frank Ponce De Leon, a coast committeeman at the ILWU, said: “Congestion won’t be fixed until everyone steps up and does their part. The terminal operators have been underutilizing their option to hire us for the third shift.</p><p><blockquote>ILWU海岸委员弗兰克·庞塞·德莱昂(Frank Ponce De Leon)表示：“除非每个人都站出来尽自己的一份力量，否则拥堵不会得到解决。码头运营商没有充分利用他们雇用我们做第三班的选择。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, elsewhere in the supply chian, Federal safety regulations prevent commercial truck drivers to 11 hours of driving in a 14 hour workday. Port truckers like to start early in the morning so they can maximize the number of loads they can transport in a day.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，在供应链的其他地方，联邦安全法规禁止商用卡车司机在14小时工作日中驾驶11小时。港口卡车司机喜欢一大早就出发，这样他们就可以最大限度地增加一天内运输的货物数量。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65d90e5ff24743575095fb2c886f30b9\" tg-width=\"293\" tg-height=\"469\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Tom Boyle, chief executive of Quik Pick Express LLC, a trucking and warehousing provider, told the Journal: “The biggest issue it probably comes down to is labor.”</p><p><blockquote>卡车运输和仓储提供商Quik Pick Express LLC的首席执行官汤姆·博伊尔(Tom Boyle)告诉《华尔街日报》：“最大的问题可能归结为劳动力。”</blockquote></p><p> Rail operator Union Pacific says it sees most delays when it picks up cargo from ports and hands it to trucks at destinations.</p><p><blockquote>铁路运营商联合太平洋公司表示，当它从港口提取货物并在目的地将其交给卡车时，它会看到大多数延误。</blockquote></p><p> Wim Lagaay, chief executive of APM Terminals North America, who operates at the port of LA, said: “If you work a gate 24/7 it will improve your velocity. Up to 30% of overall truck appointments are not met because there are not enough trucks, drivers or chassis.”</p><p><blockquote>在洛杉矶港运营的APM Terminals North America首席执行官Wim Lagaay表示：“如果你全天候在登机口工作，就会提高你的速度。高达30%的卡车预约没有得到满足，因为没有足够的卡车、司机或底盘。”</blockquote></p><p> Matt Schrap, chief executive of the Harbor Trucking Association, added: “There is too much congestion from empty containers on terminals. The shipping lines aren’t moving the boxes out, which is preventing us from returning empties that we are storing in our yards.\"</p><p><blockquote>港口卡车运输协会首席执行官马特·施拉普(Matt Schrap)补充道：“码头上的空集装箱造成了太多拥堵。航运公司没有将箱子运出，这使我们无法退回存放在堆场的空集装箱。”</blockquote></p><p> Mario Cordero, executive director at the Port of Long Beach concluded: “It’s impossible to effectively move such volumes if we don’t move to 24/7 operations across the supply chain. They do it in other parts of the world.”</p><p><blockquote>长滩港执行董事马里奥·科德罗(Mario Cordero)总结道：“如果我们不在整个供应链中转向24/7运营，就不可能有效地转移如此数量。他们在世界其他地区也这样做。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Despite Record Cargo Backlogs, Ports Of L.A. And Long Beach Still Don't Operate Around The Clock<blockquote>尽管货物积压创纪录，洛杉矶和长滩港口仍然无法全天候运营</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDespite Record Cargo Backlogs, Ports Of L.A. And Long Beach Still Don't Operate Around The Clock<blockquote>尽管货物积压创纪录，洛杉矶和长滩港口仍然无法全天候运营</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-09-28 09:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some of the busiest U.S. ports, including many in California, are still struggling with how to deal with significant cargo backlogs.</p><p><blockquote>美国一些最繁忙的港口，包括加利福尼亚州的许多港口，仍在努力应对大量货物积压。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, despite the backlog, the busiest U.S. port still shuts down for hours on most days and is closed on Sundays,the Wall Street Journal reports. \"Tens of thousands\" of containers remain stuck at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. More than 60 ships are lined up to dock, the report says.</p><p><blockquote>然而，据《华尔街日报》报道，尽管积压，美国最繁忙的港口在大多数日子里仍然关闭数小时，周日也关闭。“数万”集装箱仍滞留在洛杉矶和长滩港口。报道称，60多艘船排队停靠码头。</blockquote></p><p> More than 25% of all American imports pass through one of the two ports. LA and Long Beach collectively manage 13 private container terminals. Long Beach officials finally said last week they would try operating 24 hours a day between Monday and Thursday. LA says it's going to keep existing hours and wait for the rest of the supply chain to extend their hours first.</p><p><blockquote>超过25%的美国进口商品通过这两个港口之一。洛杉矶和长滩共同管理着13个私人集装箱码头。长滩官员上周终于表示，他们将尝试在周一至周四之间每天24小时运营。洛杉矶表示，将保持现有工作时间，并等待供应链的其他部分先延长工作时间。</blockquote></p><p> Gene Seroka, executive director of the larger Port of Los Angeles, said: “It has been nearly impossible to get everyone on the same page towards 24/7 operations.”</p><p><blockquote>洛杉矶较大港口的执行董事吉恩·塞罗卡(Gene Seroka)表示：“几乎不可能让每个人都在24/7运营方面达成一致。”</blockquote></p><p> Ports in places like Asia and Europe, for contrast, have operated around the clock \"for years\", the report notes.</p><p><blockquote>报告指出，相比之下，亚洲和欧洲等地的港口“多年来”一直在全天候运营。</blockquote></p><p> Uffe Ostergaard, president of the North America region for German boxship operator Hapag-Lloyd AG said: “With the current work schedule you have two big ports operating at 60%-70% of their capacity. That’s a huge operational disadvantage.”</p><p><blockquote>德国集装箱船运营商赫伯罗特股份公司北美地区总裁Uffe Ostergaard表示：“按照目前的工作时间表，两个大型港口的运营能力为60%-70%。这是一个巨大的运营劣势。”</blockquote></p><p> As the shortage continues, all members of the supply chain including truckers, warehouse operators and railways, are blaming each other for the shortages of products. All parts of the supply chain are also struggling with a shortage of labor.</p><p><blockquote>随着短缺的持续，供应链的所有成员，包括卡车司机、仓库运营商和铁路，都在互相指责产品短缺。供应链的各个部分也都在与劳动力短缺作斗争。</blockquote></p><p> A longshore shift at either of the two ports used to be either 8AM to 4PM or 6PM to 3AM. Overnight shifts of 5 hours were \"rarely used\" because they are up to 50% more expensive, the report says.</p><p><blockquote>这两个港口的码头班次过去是上午8点至下午4点或下午6点至凌晨3点。报告称，5小时的夜班“很少使用”，因为它们的费用高达50%。</blockquote></p><p> The International Longshore and Warehouse Union says their members will work a third shift, but only after the pileup of containers is fetched out of the port so there is space.</p><p><blockquote>国际码头和仓库联盟表示，他们的成员将进行第三班工作，但前提是堆积如山的集装箱被运出港口，以便有空间。</blockquote></p><p> Frank Ponce De Leon, a coast committeeman at the ILWU, said: “Congestion won’t be fixed until everyone steps up and does their part. The terminal operators have been underutilizing their option to hire us for the third shift.</p><p><blockquote>ILWU海岸委员弗兰克·庞塞·德莱昂(Frank Ponce De Leon)表示：“除非每个人都站出来尽自己的一份力量，否则拥堵不会得到解决。码头运营商没有充分利用他们雇用我们做第三班的选择。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, elsewhere in the supply chian, Federal safety regulations prevent commercial truck drivers to 11 hours of driving in a 14 hour workday. Port truckers like to start early in the morning so they can maximize the number of loads they can transport in a day.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，在供应链的其他地方，联邦安全法规禁止商用卡车司机在14小时工作日中驾驶11小时。港口卡车司机喜欢一大早就出发，这样他们就可以最大限度地增加一天内运输的货物数量。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65d90e5ff24743575095fb2c886f30b9\" tg-width=\"293\" tg-height=\"469\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Tom Boyle, chief executive of Quik Pick Express LLC, a trucking and warehousing provider, told the Journal: “The biggest issue it probably comes down to is labor.”</p><p><blockquote>卡车运输和仓储提供商Quik Pick Express LLC的首席执行官汤姆·博伊尔(Tom Boyle)告诉《华尔街日报》：“最大的问题可能归结为劳动力。”</blockquote></p><p> Rail operator Union Pacific says it sees most delays when it picks up cargo from ports and hands it to trucks at destinations.</p><p><blockquote>铁路运营商联合太平洋公司表示，当它从港口提取货物并在目的地将其交给卡车时，它会看到大多数延误。</blockquote></p><p> Wim Lagaay, chief executive of APM Terminals North America, who operates at the port of LA, said: “If you work a gate 24/7 it will improve your velocity. Up to 30% of overall truck appointments are not met because there are not enough trucks, drivers or chassis.”</p><p><blockquote>在洛杉矶港运营的APM Terminals North America首席执行官Wim Lagaay表示：“如果你全天候在登机口工作，就会提高你的速度。高达30%的卡车预约没有得到满足，因为没有足够的卡车、司机或底盘。”</blockquote></p><p> Matt Schrap, chief executive of the Harbor Trucking Association, added: “There is too much congestion from empty containers on terminals. The shipping lines aren’t moving the boxes out, which is preventing us from returning empties that we are storing in our yards.\"</p><p><blockquote>港口卡车运输协会首席执行官马特·施拉普(Matt Schrap)补充道：“码头上的空集装箱造成了太多拥堵。航运公司没有将箱子运出，这使我们无法退回存放在堆场的空集装箱。”</blockquote></p><p> Mario Cordero, executive director at the Port of Long Beach concluded: “It’s impossible to effectively move such volumes if we don’t move to 24/7 operations across the supply chain. They do it in other parts of the world.”</p><p><blockquote>长滩港执行董事马里奥·科德罗(Mario Cordero)总结道：“如果我们不在整个供应链中转向24/7运营，就不可能有效地转移如此数量。他们在世界其他地区也这样做。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/despite-record-cargo-backlogs-ports-la-and-long-beach-still-dont-operate-around-clock?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/despite-record-cargo-backlogs-ports-la-and-long-beach-still-dont-operate-around-clock?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154590665","content_text":"Some of the busiest U.S. ports, including many in California, are still struggling with how to deal with significant cargo backlogs.\nYet, despite the backlog, the busiest U.S. port still shuts down for hours on most days and is closed on Sundays,the Wall Street Journal reports. \"Tens of thousands\" of containers remain stuck at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. More than 60 ships are lined up to dock, the report says.\nMore than 25% of all American imports pass through one of the two ports. LA and Long Beach collectively manage 13 private container terminals. Long Beach officials finally said last week they would try operating 24 hours a day between Monday and Thursday. LA says it's going to keep existing hours and wait for the rest of the supply chain to extend their hours first.\nGene Seroka, executive director of the larger Port of Los Angeles, said: “It has been nearly impossible to get everyone on the same page towards 24/7 operations.”\nPorts in places like Asia and Europe, for contrast, have operated around the clock \"for years\", the report notes.\nUffe Ostergaard, president of the North America region for German boxship operator Hapag-Lloyd AG said: “With the current work schedule you have two big ports operating at 60%-70% of their capacity. That’s a huge operational disadvantage.”\nAs the shortage continues, all members of the supply chain including truckers, warehouse operators and railways, are blaming each other for the shortages of products. All parts of the supply chain are also struggling with a shortage of labor.\nA longshore shift at either of the two ports used to be either 8AM to 4PM or 6PM to 3AM. Overnight shifts of 5 hours were \"rarely used\" because they are up to 50% more expensive, the report says.\nThe International Longshore and Warehouse Union says their members will work a third shift, but only after the pileup of containers is fetched out of the port so there is space.\nFrank Ponce De Leon, a coast committeeman at the ILWU, said: “Congestion won’t be fixed until everyone steps up and does their part. The terminal operators have been underutilizing their option to hire us for the third shift.\nMeanwhile, elsewhere in the supply chian, Federal safety regulations prevent commercial truck drivers to 11 hours of driving in a 14 hour workday. Port truckers like to start early in the morning so they can maximize the number of loads they can transport in a day.\nTom Boyle, chief executive of Quik Pick Express LLC, a trucking and warehousing provider, told the Journal: “The biggest issue it probably comes down to is labor.”\nRail operator Union Pacific says it sees most delays when it picks up cargo from ports and hands it to trucks at destinations.\nWim Lagaay, chief executive of APM Terminals North America, who operates at the port of LA, said: “If you work a gate 24/7 it will improve your velocity. Up to 30% of overall truck appointments are not met because there are not enough trucks, drivers or chassis.”\nMatt Schrap, chief executive of the Harbor Trucking Association, added: “There is too much congestion from empty containers on terminals. The shipping lines aren’t moving the boxes out, which is preventing us from returning empties that we are storing in our yards.\"\nMario Cordero, executive director at the Port of Long Beach concluded: “It’s impossible to effectively move such volumes if we don’t move to 24/7 operations across the supply chain. They do it in other parts of the world.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2258,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":false}