这篇文章不错，转发给_老虎社区_美港股上老虎 - 老虎社区

点赞
评论
收藏

金色
2021-07-08

这篇文章不错，转发给大家看

京东提出“双11”商标无效，阿里维权被驳回

京东公司提出无效宣告请求法律适用正确。

京东提出“双11”商标无效，阿里维权被驳回

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

点赞

举报

评论

推荐
最新

empty

暂无评论

热议股票

关于我们·老虎社区守则·老虎社区账号管理规范·老虎社区服务协议·老虎社区隐私政策

公司名称：北京至简风宜信息技术有限公司

违法和不良信息投诉：010-5681-3562（工作时间9:30-18:30）

邮箱：service@laohu8.com

老虎社区侵权投诉指引

中国互联网举报中心·北京互联网举报中心

网络谣言曝光台·扫黄打非举报中心

网络110报警服务

© 2018-2024 老虎社区版权所有

营业执照：91110105MA01A4U55R

ICP备：京ICP备18016422号

网安备：京公网安备11010502036490

qrcode

关注我们

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":143939044,"tweetId":"143939044","gmtCreate":1625754776188,"gmtModify":1625754776188,"author":{"id":3477179785918695,"authorId":3477179785918695,"authorIdStr":"3477179785918695","name":"金色","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98b794296a95f2952fe9b6ab3239c8b0","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>\n这篇文章不错，转发给大家看</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>\n这篇文章不错，转发给大家看</body></html>","text":"这篇文章不错，转发给大家看","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/143939044","repostId":2149345927,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2149345927","pubTimestamp":1625732055,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2149345927?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-08 16:14","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"京东提出“双11”商标无效，阿里维权被驳回","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2149345927","media":"企查查","summary":"京东公司提出无效宣告请求法律适用正确。","content":"<p>企查查APP显示，近日，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">阿里巴巴</a>公司因与被上诉人<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">京东</a>公司商标权无效宣告请求行政纠纷一案，不服判决，提起上诉。</p>\n<p>相关二审行政判决书近日公开，法院查明一审中认为诉争商标由汉字及数字组合“双11”组成，难以起到商标的识别性作用，缺乏商标应有的显著特征，京东公司提出无效宣告请求法律适用正确。二审法院认为原审判决认定事实清楚，裁判结果为驳回阿里巴巴公司上诉。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fea873bad9625470f17468f6c114e12b\" tg-width=\"687\" tg-height=\"773\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"qcc_live","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>京东提出“双11”商标无效，阿里维权被驳回</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n京东提出“双11”商标无效，阿里维权被驳回\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-08 16:14 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://news.qcc.com/postnews_93d0af9b104679a37a295e54f194efa9rss.html><strong>企查查</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>企查查APP显示，近日，阿里巴巴公司因与被上诉人京东公司商标权无效宣告请求行政纠纷一案，不服判决，提起上诉。\n相关二审行政判决书近日公开，法院查明一审中认为诉争商标由汉字及数字组合“双11”组成，难以起到商标的识别性作用，缺乏商标应有的显著特征，京东公司提出无效宣告请求法律适用正确。二审法院认为原审判决认定事实清楚，裁判结果为驳回阿里巴巴公司上诉。</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://news.qcc.com/postnews_93d0af9b104679a37a295e54f194efa9rss.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9eda6dba1595e48aa65fb39e088d541","relate_stocks":{"09618":"京东集团-SW","JD":"京东","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://news.qcc.com/postnews_93d0af9b104679a37a295e54f194efa9rss.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2149345927","content_text":"企查查APP显示，近日，阿里巴巴公司因与被上诉人京东公司商标权无效宣告请求行政纠纷一案，不服判决，提起上诉。\n相关二审行政判决书近日公开，法院查明一审中认为诉争商标由汉字及数字组合“双11”组成，难以起到商标的识别性作用，缺乏商标应有的显著特征，京东公司提出无效宣告请求法律适用正确。二审法院认为原审判决认定事实清楚，裁判结果为驳回阿里巴巴公司上诉。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1765,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":25,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}