美联储货币政策鹰声再起! 前有三张FOMC加息反对票，后有地方联储再鸣“政策不够紧”警报_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

美联储货币政策鹰声再起! 前有三张FOMC加息反对票，后有地方联储再鸣“政策不够紧”警报

智通财经08-05

智通财经APP获悉，堪萨斯城联邦储备银行主席施密德(Jeff Schmid)周二表示，为实现美联储的物价稳定目标，可能需要进一步提高利率，并且再度重申通胀仍是其首要关切。施密德当地时间周二在为奥马哈一场活动准备的讲话中表示：“鉴于需求和AI算力基础设施投资依然强劲，我不认为当前的货币政策立场具有紧缩性质以及限制性。因此，我认为，要把通胀降至美联储2%的目标水平，就需要采取更紧缩的政策。”对于需要...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

暂无评论

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2657759138?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42d623bf2f962cffafc93d5db7d45f9c","is_english":false,"pubTime":"2026-08-05 10:11","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2657759138","market":"sh","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"美联储货币政策鹰声再起! 前有三张FOMC加息反对票，后有地方联储再鸣“政策不够紧”警报","media":"智通财经","content":"<div>\n<p>智通财经APP获悉，堪萨斯城联邦储备银行主席施密德(Jeff Schmid)周二表示，为实现美联储的物价稳定目标，可能需要进一步提高利率，并且再度重申通胀仍是其首要关切。施密德当地时间周二在为奥马哈一场活动准备的讲话中表示：“鉴于需求和AI算力基础设施投资依然强劲，我不认为当前的货币政策立场具有紧缩性质以及限制性。因此，我认为，要把通胀降至美联储2%的目标水平，就需要采取更紧缩的政策。”对于需要...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/1476115.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"stock_zhitongcaijing","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>美联储货币政策鹰声再起! 前有三张FOMC加息反对票，后有地方联储再鸣“政策不够紧”警报</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n美联储货币政策鹰声再起! 前有三张FOMC加息反对票，后有地方联储再鸣“政策不够紧”警报\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-08-05 10:11 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/1476115.html><strong>智通财经</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>智通财经APP获悉，堪萨斯城联邦储备银行主席施密德(Jeff Schmid)周二表示，为实现美联储的物价稳定目标，可能需要进一步提高利率，并且再度重申通胀仍是其首要关切。施密德当地时间周二在为奥马哈一场活动准备的讲话中表示：“鉴于需求和AI算力基础设施投资依然强劲，我不认为当前的货币政策立场具有紧缩性质以及限制性。因此，我认为，要把通胀降至美联储2%的目标水平，就需要采取更紧缩的政策。”对于需要...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/1476115.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FDLS","symbol_name":"INSPIRE FIDELIS MULTI FACTOR ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/1476115.html","article_id":"2657759138","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.tigerbbs.com/42d623bf2f962cffafc93d5db7d45f9c"],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2657759138","pubTimestamp":1785895882,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"stock_zhitongcaijing","name":"智通财经网"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"美联储FOMC政策制定者们上周投票决定维持基准利率不变。施密德今年没有美联储FOMC货币政策投票权，但是他警告称，不应想当然地认为由供给冲击引发的通胀压力会很快消退。保尔森以及美联储政策制定三号人物——任期内拥有FOMC永久投票权的纽约联储主席威廉姆斯，代表的则是更接近多数派的数据依赖型谨慎观望立场。","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zhitongcaijing.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"zh","relate_stocks":{"FDLS":"INSPIRE FIDELIS MULTI FACTOR ETF","LIAX":"LifeX 2063 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF","LFAK":"LifeX 2052 Longevity Income ETF","PBTP":"INVESCO 0-5 YR US TIPS ETF","PULS":"PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF","BNDY":"Horizon Core Bond ETF","TBJL":"Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 9 Buffer ETF - July","TLTI":"NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF","WEEK":"Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF","GHTA":"Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF","DFIP":"Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF","ILTB":"iShares Core Long-Term US Bond","LDDR":"LifeX 2035 Term Income ETF","BCKT":"LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF","TLTP":"Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 12% Premium Income ETF","MRSK":"Toews Agility Shares Managed Risk ETF","SDCP":"VIRTUS NEWFLEET SHORT DURATION CORE PLUS BOND ETF","LAPR":"Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April","PMMF":"ISHARES PRIME MONEY MARKET ETF","DDSQ":"Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly","BNDC":"FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund","BIV":"美国中期债券ETF-Vanguard","SFY":"SoFi Select 500 ETF","OCTT":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF","TIPZ":"PIMCO Broad U.S. TIPS Index Ex","GCOR":"Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF","LTTI":"FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF","ZCBE":"Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF","LFAE":"LifeX 2048 Longevity Income ETF","SPD":"Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF","BNDI":"Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF","NBSM":"Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF","FOMC":"FOMO CORP.","BNDP":"Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF","BHK":"黑岩核心债券信托","BUFD":"FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF","GBND":"Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF","XTWY":"Bondbloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF","APCB":"ACTIVEPASSIVE CORE BOND ETF","IBIK":"iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term Tips ETF","GSST":"Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF","IFED":"ETRACS IFED INVEST WITH THE FED TR INDEX ETN","LIBD":"LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF","IBIJ":"Ishares Ibonds Oct 2033 Term Tips Etf","CLSE":"Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF","VTG":"Vanguard Total Treasury ETF","IBTQ":"iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Treasury ETF","SCUB":"Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF","SSCP":"SMART Small Cap ETF","GDEC":"FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December"},"translate_title":"The Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Hawks Again! After three FOMC votes against rate hike, local Feds sounded the \"policy is not tight enough\" alarm again","themeId":"fa18e8b5a9154df3a411f17d56c210b3","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e435f5fe5c410a94e48f74712fbbb40f","symbols_score_info":{"GCOR":1.5,"IBIJ":1.5,"LFAE":1.5,"BCKT":1.5,"LTTI":1.5,"CLSE":1.5,"SCUB":1.5,"GBND":1.5,"TLTI":1.5,"VTG":1.5,"XTWY":1.5,"BNDP":1.5,"APCB":1.5,"PBTP":1.5,"PULS":1.5,"GSST":1.5,"GDEC":1.5,"FOMC":1.5,"SSCP":1.5,"LDDR":1.5,"IBIK":1.5,"IBTQ":1.5,"TBJL":1.5,"TLTP":1.5,"WEEK":1.5,"BIV":1.5,"BHK":1.5,"SFY":1.5,"GHTA":1.5,"LAPR":1.5,"SPD":1.5,"FDLS":1.5,"BNDI":1.5,"DDSQ":1.5,"DFIP":1.5,"IFED":1.5,"LIAX":1.5,"ZCBE":1.5,"LIBD":1.5,"NBSM":1.5,"PMMF":1.5,"MRSK":1.5,"LFAK":1.5,"OCTT":1.5,"SDCP":1.5,"BNDC":1.5,"BUFD":1.5,"TIPZ":1.5,"BNDY":1.5,"ILTB":1.5},"content_text":"智通财经APP获悉，堪萨斯城联邦储备银行主席施密德(Jeff Schmid)周二表示，为实现美联储的物价稳定目标，可能需要进一步提高利率，并且再度重申通胀仍是其首要关切。施密德当地时间周二在为奥马哈一场活动准备的讲话中表示：“鉴于需求和AI算力基础设施投资依然强劲，我不认为当前的货币政策立场具有紧缩性质以及限制性。因此，我认为，要把通胀降至美联储2%的目标水平，就需要采取更紧缩的政策。”对于需要采取多大力度的行动来遏制通胀，美联储内部高级官员们之间可谓存在严重分歧。通胀已经连续五年多高于央行目标，并且由于伊朗战争以及人工智能领域的持续大规模基础设施投资，价格压力近期显著上升。美联储FOMC政策制定者们上周投票决定维持基准利率不变。但有三名美联储票委投下反对票，主张加息25个基点而不是按兵不动，理由是担忧如果当前推迟加息，未来可能需要采取更为激进的行动。施密德今年没有美联储FOMC货币政策投票权，但是他警告称，不应想当然地认为由供给冲击引发的通胀压力会很快消退。他表示，当需求同样强劲时，此类事件更有可能导致通胀大幅上升。施密德在采访中表示：“对于任何一轮通胀突然上升，我都不愿意假定它只是暂时的通胀效应。通胀飙升会持续多久，最终在很大程度上取决于美联储政策制定者们如何共同应对，或者市场预期美联储将如何应对。”周二早些时候，另一美联储地方联储主席——费城联储主席保尔森(Anna Paulson)表示，她将根据通胀的发展情况，对未来利率路径保持“开放态度”。有着“新美联储通讯社”称号的记者Nick Timiraos所指出的沟通问题具有实质性市场含义：FOMC声明只同时陈述了“增长稳健、投资强劲、通胀偏高”和“维持利率不变”，却没有充分解释为何这些条件尚不足以触发加息;反而是三份FOMC异议声明更清楚地展示了美联储政策反应函数。对金融资产定价趋势而言，9月加息已经成为真实而非尾部风险，但尚未形成稳定多数：若核心通胀继续停留在高位、油价冲击向服务价格和通胀预期扩散，Paulson等中间派可能转向支持25个基点加息;若连续数月核心通胀回落、能源价格降温且需求出现减速，美联储则可能继续等待。美联储内部鹰声再起，延迟加息或换来更激进行动通胀仍显著高于2%、劳动力市场接近充分就业、消费与AI资本开支保持韧性，但当前3.50%—3.75%的政策利率究竟是否已经形成足够约束，美联储官员们判断明显分裂。7月底的美联储FOMC会议以9票赞成、3票反对维持利率不变，哈玛克、卡什卡利和洛根均主张立即加息25个基点;这意味着争论的重点已不是“是否需要继续对抗通胀”，而是应当等待通胀自行降温，还是必须提前重新建立更强的需求约束。施密德与哈玛克处在最明确的鹰派端：两人都认为当前政策实际上并不够紧。施密德强调，在需求和投资仍强、AI基础设施建设抬升投入品价格、中东能源冲击反复出现的环境中，不能机械地把供给冲击视为“暂时性通胀”;供给冲击是否转化为持续通胀，取决于总需求是否旺盛以及市场是否相信美联储会采取行动。哈玛克的逻辑更加直接——通胀连续五年多高于目标，劳动力市场又足以承受更高利率，因此继续按兵不动可能让通胀黏性固化。洛根与卡什卡利虽然同样投票支持加息，但政策框架并不完全相同。洛根侧重现实约束不足：若货币政策没有对需求和价格形成向下压力，通胀只能依赖意外冲击回落，美联储不能把实现2%目标寄托在油价或供应链偶然改善上。卡什卡利则更强调风险管理与路径依赖：宁可现在连续、小幅收紧，也不要等通胀进一步根深蒂固后被迫采取幅度更大、对经济冲击更强的加息。这说明三张反对票不是一次协调一致的鹰派表演，而是从“潜在通胀过高”“政策限制性不足”和“预防未来失控”三条不同路径得出同一个结论。保尔森以及美联储政策制定三号人物——任期内拥有FOMC永久投票权的纽约联储主席威廉姆斯，代表的则是更接近多数派的数据依赖型谨慎观望立场。保尔森预计剔除能源和关税等暂时因素后的潜在通胀仍在2.4%—2.8%，但她同时看到高按揭利率、部分家庭需求疲软和工资增速放缓，因而保留两种情景：现有政策可能已经温和限制性，也可能仍不足以压低通胀;只有连续数月核心通胀改善或持续顽固，才能确认下一步方向。威廉姆斯相对更有信心，基准判断是下半年基础通胀将继续降温、当前利率“处于良好位置”，但他同样明确表示，一旦经济偏离回归2%的轨道，就应当采取行动。两人的立场不是反对加息，而是要求获得比单月数据更充分的证据。","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComments":false,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}