Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks._老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.

Barrons2021-10-24

Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention. The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

402

DirtyGreen
·2021-10-25
Wow
回复
1
举报
PBL170
·2021-10-25
Ok
回复
1
举报
收起
- DirtyGreen:
  like
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
Andersonkana
·2021-10-25
好
回复
1
举报
SFern
·2021-10-24
Good
回复
7
举报
收起
- 6bd41974:
  K
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- DesmondAn:
  nice
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- SFern:
  Lol
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
38341f8e
·2021-10-24
Ok
回复
4
举报
收起
- k1wong:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
SG小鸭子
·2021-10-24
Like
回复
4
举报
Roykhor77
·2021-10-24
Nice
回复
4
举报
收起
- SeC:
  🙂
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- CeciLi:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
Limth
·2021-10-24
Is this wolf calling when wolf has not turned up?
回复
4
举报
收起
- Roykhor77:
  Lolz
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
7a06b928
·2021-10-24
.
回复
3
举报
收起
- 7a06b928:
  .
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
Johnlimwt
·2021-10-24
Oops
回复
5
举报
收起
- tanpp2307:
  Likely possible to happen.
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- Johnlimwt:
  No !!
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
41e183
·2021-10-24
Morning
回复
5
举报
137bd706
·2021-10-24
Please like
回复
4
举报
收起
- Pplymm:
  Done. Pls like back
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- 41e183:
  like
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
JLCH
·2021-10-24
哟
回复
2
举报
kevinlaisq
·2021-10-24
Pls like
回复
3
举报
收起
- NicholasTZL:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
- Lewis1983:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
SkyLim
·2021-10-24
Ok
回复
2
举报
jack_paing
·2021-10-24
like
回复
5
举报
收起
- Pplymm:
  Done. Pls like back
  2021-10-25
  回复
  举报
- njkk:
  like pls thanks
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
PearlynCSY
·2021-10-24
Too much printing of USD is certainly inflationary. Trump had printed $6.7 trillion. And now Biden is planning a $6 trillion budget. No wonder prices of commodity such as oil, gas, coal, iron ore etc are rising rapidly
回复
4
举报
IZLIN
·2021-10-24
@simplydkam @Sagi08 @Meow17watchout
回复
6
举报
BotakTur
·2021-10-24
Ok
回复
2
举报
收起
- BotakTur:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报
TTLZ
·2021-10-24
Ok
回复
3
举报
收起
- TTLZ:
  Ok
  2021-10-24
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1197815871","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.","media":"Barrons","content":"<div>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1601382232898","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-24 08:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1>Barrons</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":".SPX","symbol_name":"S&P 500 Index","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","article_id":"1197815871","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1601382232898","name":"Barrons"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"barrons.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"translate_title":"消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股票来说是不祥的。","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9},"content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":858734316,"gmtCreate":1635121682961,"gmtModify":1635121691898,"author":{"id":"3574808684684286","authorId":"3574808684684286","name":"DirtyGreen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa007b8422fe75437cf1ad74252b636a","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3574808684684286","idStr":"3574808684684286"},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858734316","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858482840,"gmtCreate":1635116123459,"gmtModify":1635116132887,"author":{"id":"4087190594214920","authorId":"4087190594214920","name":"PBL170","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ef4f93ba3e261ac276aef28c4467365","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4087190594214920","idStr":"4087190594214920"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858482840","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6312764,"gmtCreate":1635121689294,"gmtModify":1635121689420,"authorId":3574808684684286,"author":{"id":3574808684684286,"idStr":"3574808684684286","authorId":3574808684684286,"name":"DirtyGreen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa007b8422fe75437cf1ad74252b636a","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858482840,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like","text":"like","html":"like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858414116,"gmtCreate":1635115326123,"gmtModify":1635115326756,"author":{"id":"4088599389256890","authorId":"4088599389256890","name":"Andersonkana","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21e08c99709245ba5acdcf7245d9c40f","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4088599389256890","idStr":"4088599389256890"},"htmlText":"好","listText":"好","text":"好","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858414116","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858562665,"gmtCreate":1635084764207,"gmtModify":1635084764370,"author":{"id":"3582938826092533","authorId":"3582938826092533","name":"SFern","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a61c88544234a53cc63054a8f769b1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3582938826092533","idStr":"3582938826092533"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858562665","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6310609,"gmtCreate":1635098102316,"gmtModify":1635098102423,"authorId":3581920930646755,"author":{"id":3581920930646755,"idStr":"3581920930646755","authorId":3581920930646755,"name":"6bd41974","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858562665,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"K","text":"K","html":"K"},{"id":6310465,"gmtCreate":1635093199707,"gmtModify":1635093199751,"authorId":3581728985872006,"author":{"id":3581728985872006,"idStr":"3581728985872006","authorId":3581728985872006,"name":"DesmondAn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ac9e35f00f5ca8ebeca124189b27c86","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858562665,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"nice","text":"nice","html":"nice"},{"id":6309732,"gmtCreate":1635084769751,"gmtModify":1635084769846,"authorId":3582938826092533,"author":{"id":3582938826092533,"idStr":"3582938826092533","authorId":3582938826092533,"name":"SFern","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a61c88544234a53cc63054a8f769b1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858562665,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Lol","text":"Lol","html":"Lol"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858599791,"gmtCreate":1635075488775,"gmtModify":1635075489406,"author":{"id":"3581588474178431","authorId":"3581588474178431","name":"38341f8e","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581588474178431","idStr":"3581588474178431"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858599791","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6309095,"gmtCreate":1635080391802,"gmtModify":1635080391847,"authorId":3574996050082067,"author":{"id":3574996050082067,"idStr":"3574996050082067","authorId":3574996050082067,"name":"k1wong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9f3b0884767b721ac5720e7a17adeba","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858599791,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858509014,"gmtCreate":1635072018887,"gmtModify":1635072019070,"author":{"id":"3561283969704258","authorId":"3561283969704258","name":"SG小鸭子","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3561283969704258","idStr":"3561283969704258"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858509014","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858651187,"gmtCreate":1635047866217,"gmtModify":1635047867050,"author":{"id":"3577415925422402","authorId":"3577415925422402","name":"Roykhor77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dceebb2c02d2b0c1df8a4c7c7ebba8d9","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3577415925422402","idStr":"3577415925422402"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858651187","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6310701,"gmtCreate":1635104294482,"gmtModify":1635104294524,"authorId":3582371848241817,"author":{"id":3582371848241817,"idStr":"3582371848241817","authorId":3582371848241817,"name":"SeC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a226cf90d6854e9178341c90697ce373","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858651187,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"🙂","text":"🙂","html":"🙂"},{"id":6307831,"gmtCreate":1635063166896,"gmtModify":1635063166934,"authorId":3580709888891343,"author":{"id":3580709888891343,"idStr":"3580709888891343","authorId":3580709888891343,"name":"CeciLi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c84d7339be75b2d5f77e2eee702149e0","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858651187,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858622594,"gmtCreate":1635047334825,"gmtModify":1635047335329,"author":{"id":"3565147372726492","authorId":"3565147372726492","name":"Limth","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3e8250fe16c4e0e90561c3755568eae","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3565147372726492","idStr":"3565147372726492"},"htmlText":"Is this wolf calling when wolf has not turned up?","listText":"Is this wolf calling when wolf has not turned up?","text":"Is this wolf calling when wolf has not turned up?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858622594","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6306050,"gmtCreate":1635047859347,"gmtModify":1635047859390,"authorId":3577415925422402,"author":{"id":3577415925422402,"idStr":"3577415925422402","authorId":3577415925422402,"name":"Roykhor77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dceebb2c02d2b0c1df8a4c7c7ebba8d9","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858622594,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Lolz","text":"Lolz","html":"Lolz"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858621873,"gmtCreate":1635046998622,"gmtModify":1635046999165,"author":{"id":"3565920966285810","authorId":"3565920966285810","name":"7a06b928","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3565920966285810","idStr":"3565920966285810"},"htmlText":".","listText":".","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858621873","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6305864,"gmtCreate":1635047006256,"gmtModify":1635047006373,"authorId":3565920966285810,"author":{"id":3565920966285810,"idStr":"3565920966285810","authorId":3565920966285810,"name":"7a06b928","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858621873,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":".","text":".","html":"."}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858629886,"gmtCreate":1635046785788,"gmtModify":1635046786150,"author":{"id":"3578545886341911","authorId":"3578545886341911","name":"Johnlimwt","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1adeee2347b67dfd778339494a5fd26","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3578545886341911","idStr":"3578545886341911"},"htmlText":"Oops","listText":"Oops","text":"Oops","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858629886","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6312670,"gmtCreate":1635121379162,"gmtModify":1635121379232,"authorId":3585983433962847,"author":{"id":3585983433962847,"idStr":"3585983433962847","authorId":3585983433962847,"name":"tanpp2307","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4cb1adebe779f631f65a6b4332f7bc5","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858629886,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Likely possible to happen.","text":"Likely possible to happen.","html":"Likely possible to happen."},{"id":6305830,"gmtCreate":1635046802092,"gmtModify":1635046802119,"authorId":3578545886341911,"author":{"id":3578545886341911,"idStr":"3578545886341911","authorId":3578545886341911,"name":"Johnlimwt","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1adeee2347b67dfd778339494a5fd26","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858629886,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"No !!","text":"No !!","html":"No !!"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858668730,"gmtCreate":1635046101685,"gmtModify":1635046101831,"author":{"id":"4088412711170620","authorId":"4088412711170620","name":"41e183","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4088412711170620","idStr":"4088412711170620"},"htmlText":"Morning","listText":"Morning","text":"Morning","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858668730","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858661967,"gmtCreate":1635045946666,"gmtModify":1635045947070,"author":{"id":"3584415246670106","authorId":"3584415246670106","name":"137bd706","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3584415246670106","idStr":"3584415246670106"},"htmlText":"Please like&nbsp;","listText":"Please like&nbsp;","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858661967","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6310769,"gmtCreate":1635110419081,"gmtModify":1635110419201,"authorId":3582681835792049,"author":{"id":3582681835792049,"idStr":"3582681835792049","authorId":3582681835792049,"name":"Pplymm","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858661967,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done. Pls like back ","text":"Done. Pls like back ","html":"Done. Pls like back "},{"id":6305723,"gmtCreate":1635046107853,"gmtModify":1635046107891,"authorId":4088412711170620,"author":{"id":4088412711170620,"idStr":"4088412711170620","authorId":4088412711170620,"name":"41e183","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858661967,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like","text":"like","html":"like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858693137,"gmtCreate":1635041761490,"gmtModify":1635041761818,"author":{"id":"3572670964273182","authorId":"3572670964273182","name":"JLCH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37f9208a53c3a3c582fb50de5cde53d4","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3572670964273182","idStr":"3572670964273182"},"htmlText":"哟","listText":"哟","text":"哟","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858693137","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858605459,"gmtCreate":1635041366941,"gmtModify":1635041367667,"author":{"id":"3572874548548490","authorId":"3572874548548490","name":"kevinlaisq","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/329de1199f764a89b7cadf50308e183d","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3572874548548490","idStr":"3572874548548490"},"htmlText":"Pls like","listText":"Pls like","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858605459","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6305506,"gmtCreate":1635044473614,"gmtModify":1635044473727,"authorId":3575415767355515,"author":{"id":3575415767355515,"idStr":"3575415767355515","authorId":3575415767355515,"name":"NicholasTZL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ebb0cc5935e43337f33be7e274b04b2","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858605459,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":6304898,"gmtCreate":1635041670242,"gmtModify":1635041670349,"authorId":3570667103076911,"author":{"id":3570667103076911,"idStr":"3570667103076911","authorId":3570667103076911,"name":"Lewis1983","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/099e9d25c1e6a93e2189500df30fc185","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858605459,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858608090,"gmtCreate":1635041136417,"gmtModify":1635041137220,"author":{"id":"3581901940644351","authorId":"3581901940644351","name":"SkyLim","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581901940644351","idStr":"3581901940644351"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858608090","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858874148,"gmtCreate":1635040870237,"gmtModify":1635040870379,"author":{"id":"3581833173571708","authorId":"3581833173571708","name":"jack_paing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3eb267d3238b5dcb9bfb6ceb846015c7","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581833173571708","idStr":"3581833173571708"},"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858874148","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6310770,"gmtCreate":1635110429342,"gmtModify":1635110429463,"authorId":3582681835792049,"author":{"id":3582681835792049,"idStr":"3582681835792049","authorId":3582681835792049,"name":"Pplymm","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858874148,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done. Pls like back ","text":"Done. Pls like back ","html":"Done. Pls like back "},{"id":6304643,"gmtCreate":1635040944700,"gmtModify":1635040944742,"authorId":3575950181915531,"author":{"id":3575950181915531,"idStr":"3575950181915531","authorId":3575950181915531,"name":"njkk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6382201e8e84ccd3f8e89b9a28e74607","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858874148,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like pls thanks","text":"like pls thanks","html":"like pls thanks"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858870283,"gmtCreate":1635040243172,"gmtModify":1635048831401,"author":{"id":"4092458811577680","authorId":"4092458811577680","name":"PearlynCSY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3e9fe7af061efe80a756d23de62e7b3","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4092458811577680","idStr":"4092458811577680"},"htmlText":"Too much printing of USD is certainly inflationary. Trump had printed $6.7 trillion. And now Biden is planning a $6 trillion budget. No wonder prices of commodity such as oil, gas, coal, iron ore etc&nbsp;are rising rapidly","listText":"Too much printing of USD is certainly inflationary. Trump had printed $6.7 trillion. And now Biden is planning a $6 trillion budget. No wonder prices of commodity such as oil, gas, coal, iron ore etc&nbsp;are rising rapidly","text":"Too much printing of USD is certainly inflationary. Trump had printed $6.7 trillion. And now Biden is planning a $6 trillion budget. No wonder prices of commodity such as oil, gas, coal, iron ore etc are rising rapidly","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858870283","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858870107,"gmtCreate":1635040228037,"gmtModify":1635040507199,"author":{"id":"3581848609787274","authorId":"3581848609787274","name":"IZLIN","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2241963762942310c858a3aae49c0d1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581848609787274","idStr":"3581848609787274"},"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582502706085184\">@simplydkam</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582026494482473\">@Sagi08</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3581561113691319\">@Meow17</a>watchout","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582502706085184\">@simplydkam</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3582026494482473\">@Sagi08</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3581561113691319\">@Meow17</a>watchout","text":"@simplydkam@Sagi08@Meow17watchout","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858870107","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858844620,"gmtCreate":1635040012599,"gmtModify":1635040475981,"author":{"id":"4090202748844200","authorId":"4090202748844200","name":"BotakTur","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbfb7690052b45745da7270aa672c42d","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4090202748844200","idStr":"4090202748844200"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858844620","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6304394,"gmtCreate":1635040017244,"gmtModify":1635040017347,"authorId":4090202748844200,"author":{"id":4090202748844200,"idStr":"4090202748844200","authorId":4090202748844200,"name":"BotakTur","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbfb7690052b45745da7270aa672c42d","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858844620,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":858846385,"gmtCreate":1635039680324,"gmtModify":1635040317226,"author":{"id":"3581826176705129","authorId":"3581826176705129","name":"TTLZ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3285bfaae2742e85571cc7d44bad2420","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581826176705129","idStr":"3581826176705129"},"htmlText":"Ok&nbsp;","listText":"Ok&nbsp;","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858846385","repostId":1197815871,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197815871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635036807,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1197815871?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 08:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197815871","media":"Barrons","summary":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nT","content":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Consumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConsumer Confidence Is Falling. Why That’s Ominous for Stocks.<blockquote>消费者信心正在下降。为什么这对股市不利？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-24 08:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nConsumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.<blockquote>消费者正在发出投资者没有注意到的令人担忧的信号。是时候注意了。</blockquote> The stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.<blockquote>股市和消费者情绪通常会同步上涨和下跌。以过去的18个月为例。超宽松的全球货币政策、创纪录水平的财政刺激以及不断上升的盈利预测使股市接连创下新高。同样的刺激力量，加上限制社会活动的流行病，帮助美国消费者积累了超过2万亿美元的储蓄，尽管劳动力市场收紧，工资攀升。这些股市上涨让消费者感到更加兴奋，而兴奋的消费者让投资者更加看涨。</blockquote> Recently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&amp;P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.<blockquote>然而，最近，这种相关性已经被打破。随着股市走高，消费者变得不那么乐观，标普500指数周四创下历史新高。正如摩根士丹利财富管理公司首席投资官丽莎·沙莱特 (Lisa Shalett) 指出的那样，密歇根大学消费者信心指数在 8 月份跌至 2012 年以来的最低水平后，9 月份仅小幅反弹，至 2020 年 3 月的疫情低点。世界大型企业联合会的消费者信心指数同样下滑。</blockquote> The gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.<blockquote>沙莱特表示，这些读数与股市变化之间的差距仍然异常大。当前读数与未来预期之间的差距也在扩大，这表明消费者并不认为他们的担忧是暂时的。尽管最新一波 Covid-19 感染似乎已经达到顶峰，但信心差距依然存在，这意味着这个故事不仅仅是病毒本身。</blockquote> So, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.<blockquote>那么，谁是对的？沙莱特倾向于从消费者的角度出发，她并不孤单。</blockquote> In a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.<blockquote>在本月早些时候的一篇论文中，达特茅斯学院经济学教授、英格兰银行货币政策委员会前外部成员大卫-布兰奇弗劳尔（David Blanchflower）和伦敦大学学院定量社会科学教授亚历克斯-布赖森（Alex Bryson）撰文介绍了他们看涨期权的 “走动的经济学”。这个想法是：当地的人们根据自己的经验和他们认识的人的经验拥有关于经济趋势的信息，这使他们能够评估未来的经济趋势。</blockquote> Their conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.<blockquote>他们的结论是：经济冲击很难预测，但关于消费者预期的定性指标可以预测经济衰退。他们显示，密歇根大学和世界大型企业联合会的消费者预期指数都预测美国经济将提前18个月出现衰退。他们发现，自 20 世纪 80 年代以来的所有衰退都是通过这些指数至少下降 10 个百分点来预测的。</blockquote> The Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.<blockquote>Blanchflower和Bryson说，密歇根州的指标在2021年6月达到峰值，到8月下降了18点，而世界大型企业联合会的指标在2021年3月达到峰值，然后到2021年9月下降了26点。他们说，虽然他们将 2021 年的经济形势看涨期权为 “特殊”，但过去六个月消费者预期的下调表明，美国经济现在正在进入衰退。</blockquote> “This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”<blockquote>“布兰奇弗劳尔和布赖森说：”这是一个大胆的看涨期权，与共识不符。“然而，正如大多数政策制定者和经济学家所做的那样，错过了2007年这些变量的下降，事实证明是致命的。”</blockquote> The reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.<blockquote>情绪恶化背后的原因至少与下滑本身一样重要。调查显示，即使美联储继续否认建筑定价压力，通货膨胀仍是消费者最关心的问题。</blockquote> Consider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.<blockquote>以《零售销售》为例，华尔街将这一系列视为消费者旺盛的证据。Bleakley Advisory Group 首席投资官 Peter Boockvar 指出，自 3 月份发出最后一轮刺激支票以来，零售额仅增长了 0.4%，而消费者价格指数则上涨了 3.6%。“布克瓦尔说：”有人可以说，自 3 月份以来的所有零售额，以及一些零售额，都是通货膨胀，而不是销量。</blockquote> Widespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.<blockquote>普遍的短缺意味着可以购买的商品减少，但风险在于假设需求只是被推迟。如果消费者在等待汽车、房屋和其他物品变得可用或负担得起时变得越来越谨慎，潜在的消费可能会损失。</blockquote> People are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.<blockquote>密歇根大学经济学家理查德·科廷表示，尽管无处不在的求助迹象和工资快速增长，但人们也担心就业市场。由于工资增长仍未跟上消费者价格通胀的步伐，工人们可能已经永久性地放弃了在大流行病期间风险更大的工作，并且无法支付足够的费用来支付费用。许多企业正在开辟新的道路--新企业的成立不断激增--这强化了劳动力短缺并非暂时的观点。</blockquote> What is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.<blockquote>投资者的结果是什么？“沙莱特说：”如果消费者信心不能迅速改善，这可能是市场疲软的信号，而令人失望的盈利、支出疲软和储蓄率上升将引发市场疲软。</blockquote> There are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.<blockquote>她表示，在某些地方，持续的劳动力短缺和消费者信心下降交织在一起，建议投资者寻找那些利用更具弹性的需求且对劳动力依赖较少的公司。她更喜欢企业对企业的公司，而不是直接向消费者销售的公司，并表示选股的最佳地点是银行、能源和工业行业。</blockquote> Consumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.<blockquote>消费者目前的恐慌情绪可能是暂时的。但恐慌情绪本身及其背后的原因发出了一个不祥的信息，投资者不应忽视。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/us-economy-stock-market-consumer-confidence-51634943248?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197815871","content_text":"Consumers are sending worrisome signals that investors aren’t heeding. It’s time to pay attention.\nThe stock market and consumer sentiment usually rise and fall in tandem. Take the past 18 months. Ultraloose global monetary policy, record levels of fiscal stimulus, and rising earnings forecasts have sent stocks to successive highs. The same stimulative forces, plus a pandemic that curtailed social activity, helped U.S. consumers amass more than $2 trillion in savings, even as the labor market tightened and wages climbed. Those stock market gains made consumers feel even more flush, and flush consumers made investors more bullish.\nRecently, though, the correlation has broken down. Consumers have become far less cheery while the stock market has marched higher, with the S&P 500 index hitting an all-time high on Thursday. As Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, notes, the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment index bounced up only slightly in September—to its March 2020 pandemic low—after dropping in August to the worst level since 2012. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index similarly tumbled.\nThe gap between those readings and the change in the stock market remains uncharacteristically wide, Shalett says. The difference between current readings and future expectations is also widening, suggesting that consumers don’t see their concerns as temporary. The confidence gap has persisted even as the latest wave of Covid-19 infections appears to have peaked, meaning there’s more to the story than the virus.\nSo, who is right? Shalett leans toward the consumer’s view, and she’s not alone.\nIn a paper earlier this month, David Blanchflower, an economics professor at Dartmouth College and a former external member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, and Alex Bryson, a professor of quantitative social science at University College London, wrote about what they call “the economics of walking about.” The idea: that people on the ground possess information about economic trends based on their own experiences and the experiences of those they know, which allows them to assess future economic trends.\nTheir conclusion: Economic shocks are hard to predict, but qualitative metrics about consumer expectations are predictive of downturns. They show that consumer-expectations indexes from both the University of Michigan and the Conference Board predict downturns up to 18 months in advance in the U.S. They find that all recessions since the 1980s have been predicted by at least 10-point drops in those indexes.\nThe Michigan gauge peaked in June 2021 and fell by 18 points by August, while the Conference Board measure peaked in March 2021 and then fell by 26 points through September 2021, say Blanchflower and Bryson. While they call the economic situation in 2021 “exceptional,” downshifts in consumer expectations in the past six months suggest that the U.S. economy is entering recession now, they say.\n“This is a bold call, and not consistent with consensus,” say Blanchflower and Bryson. “However, missing the declines in these variables in 2007, as most policy makers and economists did, proved fatal.”\nThe reasons behind souring sentiment are at least as important as the decline itself. Surveys show that inflation is consumers’ top concern, even if the Federal Reserve continues to dismiss building pricing pressures.\nConsider retail sales, one series that Wall Street points to as evidence of buoyant consumers. Since March, when the last round of stimulus checks was sent, retail sales are up just 0.4%, while the consumer price index has risen 3.6%, notes Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Advisory Group. “One can argue that all of the retail sales since March, and then some, is inflation and not volumes,” Boockvar says.\nWidespread shortages mean there is less to buy, but risk lies in assuming that demand is simply delayed. If consumers grow increasingly wary as they wait for cars, houses, and other items to become available—or affordable—potential consumption may be lost.\nPeople are also worried about the job market, says University of Michigan economist Richard Curtin, despite ubiquitous help-wanted signs and fast wage growth. Workers may have written off more permanently jobs that became riskier during the pandemic and don’t pay enough to cover costs, as wage gains still haven’t kept pace with consumer price inflation. Many are forging new paths—new-business formation continues to explode—reinforcing the idea that the labor shortage isn’t so temporary.\nWhat is the upshot for investors? “If consumer sentiment doesn’t quickly improve, it could be a signal of market weakness that would be sparked by disappointing earnings, weaker spending, and higher savings rates,” says Shalett.\nThere are places where a lasting labor shortage and waning consumer confidence intersect, she says, recommending that investors look for companies that have tapped into more resilient demand and are less dependent on labor. She prefers business-to-business companies over those that sell directly to consumers, and says the best places to stock-pick are in banking, energy, and industrials.\nConsumers’ current funk could be transitory. But the funk itself, and the reasons for it, send an ominous message that investors shouldn’t ignore.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6304308,"gmtCreate":1635039688039,"gmtModify":1635039688122,"authorId":3581826176705129,"author":{"id":3581826176705129,"idStr":"3581826176705129","authorId":3581826176705129,"name":"TTLZ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3285bfaae2742e85571cc7d44bad2420","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":858846385,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":402,"commentSize":57,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}