Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade

Bloomberg2021-06-24

(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

112

paxson
·2021-06-24
Ok
回复
2
举报
paxson
·2021-06-24
Ok
回复
点赞
举报
Janenkea
·2021-06-24
😯
回复
点赞
举报
Pigmonkey
·2021-06-24
Like n comment pls
回复
3
举报
收起
- cxseah:
  Comment
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
xnoobletx
·2021-06-24
Ok
回复
1
举报
Frisbee
·2021-06-24
ok
回复
4
举报
Nhu
·2021-06-24
What
回复
1
举报
Natdns
·2021-06-24
Ok
回复
点赞
举报
WhenLambo69
·2021-06-24
Like and comment
回复
点赞
举报
KAHHUAT
·2021-06-24
Wow.
回复
2
举报
收起
- KAHHUAT:
  Pls comment
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
SamuelNg
·2021-06-24
like and comment pls
回复
3
举报
收起
- Mclye:
  👍
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
KH321
·2021-06-24
Good for the poor guys on the street
回复
4
举报
收起
- Enenen:
  Hg
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
DesmondChin
·2021-06-24
Ouch, really painful experience
回复
3
举报
Cindy8989
·2021-06-24
Wow
回复
4
举报
Kevin92
·2021-06-24
LiKe and comment
回复
4
举报
收起
- AdrinaChow:
  reply with like and comment pls
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
G12345
·2021-06-24
Anger!!!!
回复
2
举报
收起
- Kevin92:
  LiKe and comment
  2021-06-24
  回复
  举报
ZhiLing
·2021-06-24
wow
回复
1
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1166311858","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade","media":"Bloomberg","content":"<div>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1612507957220","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-24 08:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html>Bloomberg</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities ...\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"FNMA","symbol_name":"房利美","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","article_id":"1166311858","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1612507957220","name":"finance.yahoo"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"yahoo.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"translate_title":"“房利美-房地美”的裁决标志着对陷入困境的基金的最新打击","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9},"content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":128997911,"gmtCreate":1624497428333,"gmtModify":1631893041855,"author":{"id":"3587023069153443","authorId":"3587023069153443","name":"paxson","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3587023069153443","authorIdStr":"3587023069153443"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128997911","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128992622,"gmtCreate":1624497362766,"gmtModify":1631893041857,"author":{"id":"3587023069153443","authorId":"3587023069153443","name":"paxson","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3587023069153443","authorIdStr":"3587023069153443"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128992622","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128993685,"gmtCreate":1624497279947,"gmtModify":1634005280005,"author":{"id":"3574751332519170","authorId":"3574751332519170","name":"Janenkea","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/328bf689e0e4be71a26c7d798d76b511","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574751332519170","authorIdStr":"3574751332519170"},"htmlText":"😯","listText":"😯","text":"😯","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128993685","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128063780,"gmtCreate":1624495605440,"gmtModify":1634005334165,"author":{"id":"3568071651427696","authorId":"3568071651427696","name":"Pigmonkey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3402225c0172781df7553e20722ebad7","vip":1,"crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3568071651427696","authorIdStr":"3568071651427696"},"htmlText":"Like n comment pls","listText":"Like n comment pls","text":"Like n comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128063780","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4986526,"gmtCreate":1624498560021,"gmtModify":1635249122627,"authorId":3586519067840195,"author":{"id":3586519067840195,"idStr":"3586519067840195","authorId":3586519067840195,"name":"cxseah","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128063780,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment","text":"Comment","html":"Comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128063828,"gmtCreate":1624495592364,"gmtModify":1634005334660,"author":{"id":"3555275345264532","authorId":"3555275345264532","name":"xnoobletx","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3555275345264532","authorIdStr":"3555275345264532"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128063828","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128082223,"gmtCreate":1624495456062,"gmtModify":1634005340497,"author":{"id":"3586246426804465","authorId":"3586246426804465","name":"Frisbee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d1d7567b89f270a9a9c4d752dc00fa0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586246426804465","authorIdStr":"3586246426804465"},"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128082223","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128083172,"gmtCreate":1624495362696,"gmtModify":1634005344929,"author":{"id":"3586835307730222","authorId":"3586835307730222","name":"Nhu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586835307730222","authorIdStr":"3586835307730222"},"htmlText":"What","listText":"What","text":"What","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128083172","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128080779,"gmtCreate":1624495323091,"gmtModify":1634005346323,"author":{"id":"3576319038001885","authorId":"3576319038001885","name":"Natdns","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be6cb184b10d5e613602b38d396409cf","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576319038001885","authorIdStr":"3576319038001885"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128080779","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128012636,"gmtCreate":1624495207525,"gmtModify":1634005349794,"author":{"id":"3581496657430027","authorId":"3581496657430027","name":"WhenLambo69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7eb252b1bc52ab7567a6f6dbc62f92e","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581496657430027","authorIdStr":"3581496657430027"},"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128012636","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128036666,"gmtCreate":1624494932355,"gmtModify":1634005360034,"author":{"id":"3581548947231431","authorId":"3581548947231431","name":"KAHHUAT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0142df644dd666ed7544324b3fa02898","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581548947231431","authorIdStr":"3581548947231431"},"htmlText":"Wow.&nbsp;","listText":"Wow.&nbsp;","text":"Wow.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128036666","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4985033,"gmtCreate":1624494943726,"gmtModify":1635249275344,"authorId":3581548947231431,"author":{"id":3581548947231431,"idStr":"3581548947231431","authorId":3581548947231431,"name":"KAHHUAT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0142df644dd666ed7544324b3fa02898","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128036666,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Pls comment","text":"Pls comment","html":"Pls comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128098269,"gmtCreate":1624494690251,"gmtModify":1634005371084,"author":{"id":"3572761324363640","authorId":"3572761324363640","name":"SamuelNg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/758b132d63959927e156935f0c64d8e9","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572761324363640","authorIdStr":"3572761324363640"},"htmlText":"like and comment pls","listText":"like and comment pls","text":"like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128098269","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984939,"gmtCreate":1624494734454,"gmtModify":1635249285361,"authorId":3586592942167883,"author":{"id":3586592942167883,"idStr":"3586592942167883","authorId":3586592942167883,"name":"Mclye","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7d6caff4ccbb93636f7b7b974299e6c","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128098269,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👍","text":"👍","html":"👍"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128090874,"gmtCreate":1624494564398,"gmtModify":1634005374628,"author":{"id":"3586451610703869","authorId":"3586451610703869","name":"KH321","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1bb8bd7d6d5df5f9732871fe60999ea","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586451610703869","authorIdStr":"3586451610703869"},"htmlText":"Good for the poor guys on the street","listText":"Good for the poor guys on the street","text":"Good for the poor guys on the street","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128090874","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984972,"gmtCreate":1624494802963,"gmtModify":1635249282047,"authorId":3581919680057338,"author":{"id":3581919680057338,"idStr":"3581919680057338","authorId":3581919680057338,"name":"Enenen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e6b57054c54fb1e6337a362e002502ef","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":128090874,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Hg","text":"Hg","html":"Hg"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":128003007,"gmtCreate":1624494320209,"gmtModify":1634005381423,"author":{"id":"3578983795474363","authorId":"3578983795474363","name":"DesmondChin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b90cb6b6a6c328ac8d02a829e5e7c835","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46b6808e1ba3716fb9c53339adffa3c5","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578983795474363","authorIdStr":"3578983795474363"},"htmlText":"Ouch, really painful experience","listText":"Ouch, really painful experience","text":"Ouch, really painful experience","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128003007","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121777853,"gmtCreate":1624494253172,"gmtModify":1631891998290,"author":{"id":"3586429429180773","authorId":"3586429429180773","name":"Cindy8989","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/adcfce66b77ff6400844ec5d5e92ad3f","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586429429180773","authorIdStr":"3586429429180773"},"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/121777853","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121777053,"gmtCreate":1624494245072,"gmtModify":1634005383466,"author":{"id":"3576274545052910","authorId":"3576274545052910","name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576274545052910","authorIdStr":"3576274545052910"},"htmlText":"LiKe and comment","listText":"LiKe and comment","text":"LiKe and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/121777053","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984793,"gmtCreate":1624494315340,"gmtModify":1635249299547,"authorId":3583131237618472,"author":{"id":3583131237618472,"idStr":"3583131237618472","authorId":3583131237618472,"name":"AdrinaChow","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1b867f4c2019d6ec313665b1af8431b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":121777053,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"reply with like and comment pls","text":"reply with like and comment pls","html":"reply with like and comment pls"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121775556,"gmtCreate":1624494218275,"gmtModify":1634005384926,"author":{"id":"3586517651317278","authorId":"3586517651317278","name":"G12345","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586517651317278","authorIdStr":"3586517651317278"},"htmlText":"Anger!!!!","listText":"Anger!!!!","text":"Anger!!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/121775556","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4984747,"gmtCreate":1624494239973,"gmtModify":1635249304107,"authorId":3576274545052910,"author":{"id":3576274545052910,"idStr":"3576274545052910","authorId":3576274545052910,"name":"Kevin92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5ff4addbbdb8d9d15fec29f9709b0c3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":121775556,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"LiKe and comment","text":"LiKe and comment","html":"LiKe and comment"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":121776065,"gmtCreate":1624494137457,"gmtModify":1634005387338,"author":{"id":"3557823792637532","authorId":"3557823792637532","name":"ZhiLing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40d052b9f7db59b50f72a3cbcbc99234","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3557823792637532","authorIdStr":"3557823792637532"},"htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/121776065","repostId":1166311858,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166311858","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624493632,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1166311858?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 08:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166311858","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one","content":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFannie-Freddie Ruling Marks Latest Blow to Funds in Doomed Trade<blockquote>房利美-房地美的裁决标志着对注定失败的交易中的基金的最新打击</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBloomberg2021-06-24 08:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.<blockquote>（彭博社）——最高法院裁决后，房利美和房地美股价暴跌，标志着押注这些实体有一天会退出联邦控制的基金在令人失望的十年中遭遇的最大挫折之一。</blockquote> Capital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson &amp; Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.<blockquote>Capital Group、Fairholme Capital Management、Paulson&amp;Co.、Blackstone Group Inc.的信贷部门、Discovery Capital Management和Pershing Square等投资者押注政府资助企业的价值将大幅上涨。</blockquote> Those wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.<blockquote>周三，在法院驳回了联邦住房金融局越权从企业收取超过1000亿美元利润的指控后，这些赌注落空了。房地美股价下跌37%，而受到许多投资者青睐的房利美优先股下跌约62%。</blockquote> Capital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.<blockquote>资本集团可能是周三的大输家之一。根据公开文件，这家价值2.4万亿美元的共同基金公司去年增加了对房利美的押注，尽管一些对冲基金在时任总统唐纳德·特朗普大选失败后削减或退出了持股。</blockquote> If Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.<blockquote>如果资本集团持有截至5月31日报告的房利美优先股数量相同，仅周三一天就会损失约2.8亿美元。如果它持有的普通股数量与第一季度末相同，它将额外抹去1亿美元。</blockquote> A Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.<blockquote>资本集团发言人拒绝置评。</blockquote> Rob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.<blockquote>据该公司的一位投资者称，Rob Citrone's Discovery在特朗普败诉后削减了其头寸，但在法院裁决之前仍持有部分股份。该人士表示，今天的下跌意味着Discovery的投资略有不足。</blockquote> Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.<blockquote>根据比尔·阿克曼今年向投资者发表的声明，他的潘兴广场也继续持有股票。</blockquote> Representatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.<blockquote>香橼和阿克曼的代表拒绝置评。</blockquote> In March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.<blockquote>今年3月，阿克曼告诉投资者，如果最高法院做出有利于股东的裁决，这将是“一个改变游戏规则的事件”。他当时补充说，无论决定如何，“我们对政府支持企业的投资都是它们最终退出监管的宝贵永久选择，因为它们在美国住房金融体系中发挥着公认的不可替代的作用。”他在5月份重申了这些评论。</blockquote> For at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.<blockquote>至少十年来，投资者一直寄希望于房利美和房地美摆脱政府控制。</blockquote> Kyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”<blockquote>凯尔·巴斯(Kyle Bass)的海曼资本(Hayman Capital)在2011年的一次会议上预测，购买优先股可能“需要8到10倍的时间”。</blockquote> While the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.<blockquote>尽管2008年金融危机后，政府支持企业仍处于政府赞助之下，但也有赚钱的机会。</blockquote> The price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.<blockquote>由于人们对特朗普政府将解决其地位持乐观态度，房利美优先股的价格在2010年7月低至31美分，在2019年6月高达13.90美元。</blockquote> In their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.<blockquote>然而，在周三的裁决中，最高法院法官将案件发回下级法院，投资者可以在那里获得损害赔偿。然而，彭博资讯分析师埃利奥特·斯坦表示，这一决定意味着股东“无法收回他们所寻求的大部分超额支付”。</blockquote> For those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.<blockquote>对于那些仍在坚持的投资者来说，等待可能会很长。乔·拜登总统可能并不急于释放房利美和房地美，部分原因是它们是他的首要目标之一——消除经济不平等的关键。</blockquote> Keeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.<blockquote>将企业置于政府控制之下将使它们更容易向服务不足的社区提供抵押贷款融资。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html\">Bloomberg</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FNMA":"房利美","FMCC":"房地美"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fannie-freddie-ruling-marks-latest-223119876.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166311858","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- A plunge in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares after a Supreme Court ruling marked one of the biggest setbacks yet in a disappointing decade for funds that wagered that these entities would one day exit federal control.\nCapital Group, Fairholme Capital Management, Paulson & Co., Blackstone Group Inc.’s credit unit, Discovery Capital Management and Pershing Square are among investors that have bet on a massive jump in value for the government-sponsored enterprises.\nThose wagers went south on Wednesday after the court rejected claims that the Federal Housing Finance Agency exceeded its authority in collecting more than $100 billion in profits from the enterprises. Freddie Mac shares sunk 37%, while Fannie Mae preferred shares favored by many investors slid about 62%.\nCapital Group was likely among the big losers Wednesday. The $2.4 trillion mutual fund company increased its wagers in Fannie Mae last year, according to public filings, even as some hedge funds trimmed or exited their holdings following then-President Donald Trump’s election defeat.\nIf Capital Group held the same number of Fannie Mae preferred shares reported as of May 31, it would have lost about $280 million on Wednesday alone. If it held the same number of common shares as it did at the end of the first quarter, it would have erased an additional $100 million.\nA Capital Group spokeswoman declined to comment.\nRob Citrone’s Discovery trimmed its position after Trump lost, according to an investor in the firm, though still held on to some of its stake ahead of the court ruling. Today’s drop means Discovery is slightly underwater on its investment, the person said.\nBill Ackman’s Pershing Square also continued to hold shares, according to statements he made to investors this year.\nRepresentatives for Citrone and Ackman declined to comment.\nIn March, Ackman told investors that if the Supreme Court ruled in shareholders’ favor, it would be “a game-changing event.” He added then that regardless of the decision, “our investment in the GSEs is a valuable perpetual option on their eventual exit from conservatorship due to their widely acknowledged irreplaceable role in the U.S. housing finance system.” He reiterated these comments in May.\nFor at least a decade, investors have pinned their hopes on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shedding government control.\nKyle Bass, whose Hayman Capital made winning bets against U.S. subprime mortgages, predicted at a conference in 2011 that buying the preferred shares could be “an eight to 10-bagger from here.”\nWhile the GSEs have remained under government sponsorship in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, there have been chances to make money.\nThe price of Fannie Mae preferred shares traded as low as 31 cents in July 2010 and as high as $13.90 in June 2019 amid optimism that the Trump administration would resolve their status.\nIn their ruling Wednesday, however, the Supreme Court justices sent the case back to the lower court where investors may be able to collect damages. Yet that decision means shareholders “can’t recover the bulk of the overpayments they sought,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Elliott Stein.\nFor those investors still hanging on, the wait could be long. President Joe Biden may be in no rush to free Fannie and Freddie in part because they are a linchpin in one of his top goals -- eliminating economic inequities.\nKeeping the enterprises under government control will make it easier for them to extend mortgage financing to underserved communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FNMA":0.9,"FMCC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":112,"commentSize":17,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}