Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth

Market Wacth2021-11-08

November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points. Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

175

Kamarulzaman
·2021-11-08
November . Bullish guys
回复
1
举报
Uasbau
·2021-11-08
Infos
回复
1
举报
MHh
·2021-11-08
If it continues to rally, great!
回复
8
举报
收起
- MHh:
  [Smile]
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
- Huathk:
  Gd
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
Galaxy88
·2021-11-08
Ok
回复
5
举报
bobsk
·2021-11-08
Cant agree more. You can manipulate stats to tell u anything u want in the market. I still rmb an article saying that september was going to be fine because of 'historical analysis' when overall growth rate was high and september was just all reds
回复
5
举报
Sunny_Bee
·2021-11-08
Agree with the author. When the reporter tells you that it is the best month of the year, maybe the best month is already over. Lol.
回复
4
举报
BalancingAct
·2021-11-08
Well said...all these analysts tend to twist and rely too much on stats data which we know can be interpreted in a number of ways if you know how to present your side of the story. Every year is different and one needs to feel the ground as it plays out not after it played out then give reason or rationale ,"I said it so" . Happy investing and trading
回复
5
举报
收起
- Meroy:
  to be honest, investment is not all about analysis, fortune and time are also very important💕
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
- DaisyMoore:
  I agree with you very much. Analysts usually have good professional knowledge and solid analytical ability. Their views are very important to guide public investment. Rather than reading a lot of financial data and news every day, I prefer to directly look at the analysis conclusions of analysts.
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
- PagRobinson:
  Analysts will analyze past data to give their assessment and views on the company, and then guide their investment in the future. I think the views of analysts are very important. After all, no one can accurately predict the change of stock price.
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
Slee49
·2021-11-08
Good read
回复
2
举报
收起
- Slee49:
  Like
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
Milliondream
·2021-11-08
The options trend could be because of positive retail traders, while usually the bulls welcome the new year, we are in early Novemberand I would rather be cautious than be all guns out.
回复
5
举报
koolgal
·2021-11-08
US stocks seem to make November a great month so far as all the 3 indexes have been breaking records! Hopefully the Santa rally will be sustained right through Christmas! HHo Ho Ho, it will be a MERRY Christmas! 🎉🎊🎉🚀🚀🚀
回复
23
举报
收起
- koolgal:
  Yes that is true. Thanks for sharing
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
- 56a3dd2f:
  So far so good, most of the stocks are holding well 😊👍
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
- koolgal:
  Yes I wish I am there too.
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
查看更多 2 条评论
VinKuang
·2021-11-08
Like pls [开心]
回复
8
举报
收起
- JeremyKok:
  hi. please like and comment back. thank you.
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
- 57e0002a:
  ok
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
- WalkerWoon:
  like me too
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报
CIG
·2021-11-08
Have you watched The November Man?
回复
5
举报
Victorhc88
·2021-11-08
Like pls
回复
14
举报
收起
- JeremyKok:
  hi. please like and comment back. thank you.
  2021-11-09
  回复
  举报
- TTH4Legs:
  Liked
  2021-11-08
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1156505839","market":"sh","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth","media":"Market Wacth","content":"<div>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1604288433698","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-11-08 12:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page>Market Wacth</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":null,"symbol_name":null,"start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","article_id":"1156505839","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1604288433698","name":"Market Wacth"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"marketwatch.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{},"translate_title":"观点：华尔街会告诉你，股市在11月会大放异彩，但这是一个不加掩饰的事实","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{},"content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":false,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":845750787,"gmtCreate":1636370808575,"gmtModify":1636370808684,"author":{"id":"4097645376190010","authorId":"4097645376190010","name":"Kamarulzaman","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdd904f47ea24aec7b14f7a88bfdd544","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4097645376190010","idStr":"4097645376190010"},"htmlText":"November . Bullish guys","listText":"November . Bullish guys","text":"November . Bullish guys","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845750787","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845717436,"gmtCreate":1636368053436,"gmtModify":1636368054029,"author":{"id":"3581724772671504","authorId":"3581724772671504","name":"Uasbau","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67cdf409f2239595269918513a5faac9","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581724772671504","idStr":"3581724772671504"},"htmlText":"Infos","listText":"Infos","text":"Infos","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845717436","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845710880,"gmtCreate":1636367238462,"gmtModify":1636367242048,"author":{"id":"4091758936365950","authorId":"4091758936365950","name":"MHh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54b2feced9ef5dcc9e95997d1f4db280","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4091758936365950","idStr":"4091758936365950"},"htmlText":"If it continues to rally, great!","listText":"If it continues to rally, great!","text":"If it continues to rally, great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845710880","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6503522,"gmtCreate":1636410200728,"gmtModify":1636410200837,"authorId":4091758936365950,"author":{"id":4091758936365950,"idStr":"4091758936365950","authorId":4091758936365950,"name":"MHh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54b2feced9ef5dcc9e95997d1f4db280","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845710880,"type":1,"supId":6500594,"prevId":0,"content":"[Smile]","text":"[Smile]","html":"[Smile]"},{"id":6500594,"gmtCreate":1636380377021,"gmtModify":1636385022830,"authorId":3573472992263411,"author":{"id":3573472992263411,"idStr":"3573472992263411","authorId":3573472992263411,"name":"Huathk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43c7168c646d9ea6805194ed0003f1cc","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845710880,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":" Gd","text":" Gd","html":" Gd"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845490396,"gmtCreate":1636357746608,"gmtModify":1636357768039,"author":{"id":"4091842669394280","authorId":"4091842669394280","name":"Galaxy88","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4091842669394280","idStr":"4091842669394280"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845490396","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845569517,"gmtCreate":1636352045473,"gmtModify":1636352270167,"author":{"id":"3583206503018157","authorId":"3583206503018157","name":"bobsk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de805e0ba0f6207aca22cf1f4d68192f","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3583206503018157","idStr":"3583206503018157"},"htmlText":"Cant agree more. You can manipulate stats to tell u anything u want in the market. I still rmb an article saying that september was going to be fine because of 'historical analysis' when overall growth rate was high and september was just all reds","listText":"Cant agree more. You can manipulate stats to tell u anything u want in the market. I still rmb an article saying that september was going to be fine because of 'historical analysis' when overall growth rate was high and september was just all reds","text":"Cant agree more. You can manipulate stats to tell u anything u want in the market. I still rmb an article saying that september was going to be fine because of 'historical analysis' when overall growth rate was high and september was just all reds","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845569517","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845581587,"gmtCreate":1636351327853,"gmtModify":1636351328300,"author":{"id":"4094200026092470","authorId":"4094200026092470","name":"Sunny_Bee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1a82fcc3056cf5e54f42c722e19a7c4","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4094200026092470","idStr":"4094200026092470"},"htmlText":"Agree with the author. When the reporter tells you that it is the best month of the year, maybe the best month is already over. Lol.","listText":"Agree with the author. When the reporter tells you that it is the best month of the year, maybe the best month is already over. Lol.","text":"Agree with the author. When the reporter tells you that it is the best month of the year, maybe the best month is already over. Lol.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845581587","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845580155,"gmtCreate":1636350934036,"gmtModify":1636350934036,"author":{"id":"4094806265294780","authorId":"4094806265294780","name":"BalancingAct","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"4094806265294780","idStr":"4094806265294780"},"htmlText":"Well said...all these analysts tend to twist and rely too much on stats data which we know can be interpreted in a number of ways if you know how to present your side of the story. Every year is different and one needs to feel the ground as it plays out not after it played out then give reason or rationale ,\"I said it so\" . Happy investing and trading","listText":"Well said...all these analysts tend to twist and rely too much on stats data which we know can be interpreted in a number of ways if you know how to present your side of the story. Every year is different and one needs to feel the ground as it plays out not after it played out then give reason or rationale ,\"I said it so\" . Happy investing and trading","text":"Well said...all these analysts tend to twist and rely too much on stats data which we know can be interpreted in a number of ways if you know how to present your side of the story. Every year is different and one needs to feel the ground as it plays out not after it played out then give reason or rationale ,\"I said it so\" . Happy investing and trading","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845580155","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6499372,"gmtCreate":1636374410203,"gmtModify":1636374410203,"authorId":9000000000000482,"author":{"id":9000000000000482,"idStr":"9000000000000482","authorId":9000000000000482,"name":"Meroy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a70f12c6c7ca3e0f00f4b8fb561c5998","vip":8,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845580155,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"to be honest, investment is not all about analysis, fortune and time are also very important💕","text":"to be honest, investment is not all about analysis, fortune and time are also very important💕","html":"to be honest, investment is not all about analysis, fortune and time are also very important💕"},{"id":6496673,"gmtCreate":1636354469383,"gmtModify":1636354469383,"authorId":9000000000000640,"author":{"id":9000000000000640,"idStr":"9000000000000640","authorId":9000000000000640,"name":"DaisyMoore","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b6d4586dc3002807c92bc57e1b3a6bd","vip":8,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845580155,"type":1,"supId":6496632,"prevId":0,"content":"I agree with you very much. Analysts usually have good professional knowledge and solid analytical ability. Their views are very important to guide public investment. Rather than reading a lot of financial data and news every day, I prefer to directly look at the analysis conclusions of analysts.","text":"I agree with you very much. Analysts usually have good professional knowledge and solid analytical ability. Their views are very important to guide public investment. Rather than reading a lot of financial data and news every day, I prefer to directly look at the analysis conclusions of analysts.","html":"I agree with you very much. Analysts usually have good professional knowledge and solid analytical ability. Their views are very important to guide public investment. Rather than reading a lot of financial data and news every day, I prefer to directly look at the analysis conclusions of analysts."},{"id":6496632,"gmtCreate":1636354128191,"gmtModify":1636354128191,"authorId":9000000000000432,"author":{"id":9000000000000432,"idStr":"9000000000000432","authorId":9000000000000432,"name":"PagRobinson","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f27744c1fabf17b5f44122ab53e7da10","vip":8,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845580155,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Analysts will analyze past data to give their assessment and views on the company, and then guide their investment in the future. I think the views of analysts are very important. After all, no one can accurately predict the change of stock price.","text":"Analysts will analyze past data to give their assessment and views on the company, and then guide their investment in the future. I think the views of analysts are very important. After all, no one can accurately predict the change of stock price.","html":"Analysts will analyze past data to give their assessment and views on the company, and then guide their investment in the future. I think the views of analysts are very important. After all, no one can accurately predict the change of stock price."}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845512260,"gmtCreate":1636350395229,"gmtModify":1636350396044,"author":{"id":"3581993357014262","authorId":"3581993357014262","name":"Slee49","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4a9c556617a3ec3446f5c1c667b4aa0","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3581993357014262","idStr":"3581993357014262"},"htmlText":"Good read","listText":"Good read","text":"Good read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845512260","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6496175,"gmtCreate":1636350404803,"gmtModify":1636350404832,"authorId":3581993357014262,"author":{"id":3581993357014262,"idStr":"3581993357014262","authorId":3581993357014262,"name":"Slee49","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4a9c556617a3ec3446f5c1c667b4aa0","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845512260,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Like","text":"Like","html":"Like"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845595116,"gmtCreate":1636348310154,"gmtModify":1636348310870,"author":{"id":"3559283513621894","authorId":"3559283513621894","name":"Milliondream","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a00e2718679bd499f27764a78342e5c","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3559283513621894","idStr":"3559283513621894"},"htmlText":"The options trend could be because of positive retail traders, while usually the bulls welcome the new year, we are in early Novemberand&nbsp;I would rather be cautious than be all guns out.","listText":"The options trend could be because of positive retail traders, while usually the bulls welcome the new year, we are in early Novemberand&nbsp;I would rather be cautious than be all guns out.","text":"The options trend could be because of positive retail traders, while usually the bulls welcome the new year, we are in early Novemberand I would rather be cautious than be all guns out.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845595116","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845590689,"gmtCreate":1636347687380,"gmtModify":1636415054945,"author":{"id":"3559581955535845","authorId":"3559581955535845","name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[{"categoryType":1104,"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","isScarce":1,"plateColors":{"bgColor":{"dark":"#2f2a1f","tint":"#fcf6e5"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#dea95e","tint":"#885600"}},"effectEnabled":0,"redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"sortingWeight":0,"wearable":1}],"authorIdStr":"3559581955535845","idStr":"3559581955535845"},"htmlText":"US stocks seem&nbsp;to make November a great month so far&nbsp;as all the 3 indexes have been breaking records!&nbsp; Hopefully the Santa rally will be sustained right through Christmas! HHo Ho Ho, it will be a MERRY Christmas! 🎉🎊🎉🚀🚀🚀","listText":"US stocks seem&nbsp;to make November a great month so far&nbsp;as all the 3 indexes have been breaking records!&nbsp; Hopefully the Santa rally will be sustained right through Christmas! HHo Ho Ho, it will be a MERRY Christmas! 🎉🎊🎉🚀🚀🚀","text":"US stocks seem to make November a great month so far as all the 3 indexes have been breaking records! Hopefully the Santa rally will be sustained right through Christmas! HHo Ho Ho, it will be a MERRY Christmas! 🎉🎊🎉🚀🚀🚀","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":23,"commentSize":12,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845590689","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6510796,"gmtCreate":1636450282925,"gmtModify":1636450282925,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"idStr":"3559581955535845","authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","templateUuid":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.23","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1104,"isScarce":1,"effectEnabled":0,"wearingSort":1},"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[{"categoryType":1104,"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","isScarce":1,"plateColors":{"bgColor":{"dark":"#2f2a1f","tint":"#fcf6e5"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#dea95e","tint":"#885600"}},"effectEnabled":0,"redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"sortingWeight":0,"wearable":1}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845590689,"type":1,"supId":6506865,"prevId":0,"content":"Yes that is true.&nbsp; Thanks for sharing","text":"Yes that is true.&nbsp; Thanks for sharing","html":"Yes that is true.&nbsp; Thanks for sharing"},{"id":6506865,"gmtCreate":1636421581092,"gmtModify":1636421581123,"authorId":3563664364598207,"author":{"id":3563664364598207,"idStr":"3563664364598207","authorId":3563664364598207,"name":"56a3dd2f","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845590689,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"So far so good, most of the stocks are holding well 😊👍","text":"So far so good, most of the stocks are holding well 😊👍","html":"So far so good, most of the stocks are holding well 😊👍"},{"id":6504862,"gmtCreate":1636415054900,"gmtModify":1636415054900,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"idStr":"3559581955535845","authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","templateUuid":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.23","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1104,"isScarce":1,"effectEnabled":0,"wearingSort":1},"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[{"categoryType":1104,"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","isScarce":1,"plateColors":{"bgColor":{"dark":"#2f2a1f","tint":"#fcf6e5"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#dea95e","tint":"#885600"}},"effectEnabled":0,"redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"sortingWeight":0,"wearable":1}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845590689,"type":1,"supId":6504521,"prevId":0,"content":"Yes I wish I am there too.","text":"Yes I wish I am there too.","html":"Yes I wish I am there too."},{"id":6504521,"gmtCreate":1636414180975,"gmtModify":1636414181072,"authorId":4096368443831390,"author":{"id":4096368443831390,"idStr":"4096368443831390","authorId":4096368443831390,"name":"b1uesky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87ef9b02e19a8acfaa7ae5b147b70882","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845590689,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"it is holiday season. there will be a lot travelling around usa and Europe","text":"it is holiday season. there will be a lot travelling around usa and Europe","html":"it is holiday season. there will be a lot travelling around usa and Europe"},{"id":6498200,"gmtCreate":1636365786114,"gmtModify":1636365786114,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"idStr":"3559581955535845","authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","templateUuid":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.23","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1104,"isScarce":1,"effectEnabled":0,"wearingSort":1},"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[{"categoryType":1104,"badgeId":"99a38ff64bfd44f891fd016771fc8f64-1","name":"超级披露者","description":"在交易分享中开启超级披露","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e97d213ed3e4f4820224f1366d402f","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/802f4014829adb4e63332fc230b97e42","isScarce":1,"plateColors":{"bgColor":{"dark":"#2f2a1f","tint":"#fcf6e5"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#dea95e","tint":"#885600"}},"effectEnabled":0,"redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLinkType":1,"redirectLink":"https://www.itigerup.com/activity/forapp/star-investor","redirectLinkValidityFrom":1776816000000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":2156198400000,"sortingWeight":0,"wearable":1}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845590689,"type":1,"supId":6498094,"prevId":0,"content":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","html":"Thanks"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845507260,"gmtCreate":1636347576224,"gmtModify":1636347576566,"author":{"id":"3577323914202336","authorId":"3577323914202336","name":"VinKuang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/536d624e5750dcffec704eeed9bc003b","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3577323914202336","idStr":"3577323914202336"},"htmlText":"Like pls&nbsp;[开心]&nbsp;","listText":"Like pls&nbsp;[开心]&nbsp;","text":"Like pls [开心]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845507260","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6504473,"gmtCreate":1636414039293,"gmtModify":1636414039326,"authorId":3567307840510045,"author":{"id":3567307840510045,"idStr":"3567307840510045","authorId":3567307840510045,"name":"JeremyKok","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/01b03a485f83b6b2615fad8ac9b87bf4","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845507260,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","text":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","html":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you."},{"id":6495944,"gmtCreate":1636349438095,"gmtModify":1636349438126,"authorId":3582431165926620,"author":{"id":3582431165926620,"idStr":"3582431165926620","authorId":3582431165926620,"name":"57e0002a","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845507260,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"},{"id":6495752,"gmtCreate":1636348207090,"gmtModify":1636348207183,"authorId":3567211702241491,"author":{"id":3567211702241491,"idStr":"3567211702241491","authorId":3567211702241491,"name":"WalkerWoon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a772c81a4c88b39f7cdec13c1c0af077","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845507260,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"like me too","text":"like me too","html":"like me too"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845505194,"gmtCreate":1636347170369,"gmtModify":1636347171474,"author":{"id":"3583974841960176","authorId":"3583974841960176","name":"CIG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c2077e2370e1ffcaca7e29b875be2be","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3583974841960176","idStr":"3583974841960176"},"htmlText":"Have you watched The November Man?","listText":"Have you watched The November Man?","text":"Have you watched The November Man?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845505194","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":845247975,"gmtCreate":1636345337405,"gmtModify":1636345338118,"author":{"id":"3582248650466523","authorId":"3582248650466523","name":"Victorhc88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d72a1d9498132424b1eddb4db3c77265","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"wearingBadges":[],"authorIdStr":"3582248650466523","idStr":"3582248650466523"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845247975","repostId":1156505839,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156505839","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636344323,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1156505839?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-08 12:05","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156505839","media":"Market Wacth","summary":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be ex","content":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1604288433698","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Wall Street will tell you that stocks shine in November but here’s the unvarnished truth<blockquote>观点： 华尔街会告诉你，11 月股市大放异彩，但以下是不容置疑的事实</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarket Wacth2021-11-08 12:05\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNovember likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.<blockquote>11 月对于道琼斯工业平均指数 (DJIA) 来说可能是一个好月份，+0.56%，预计将上涨 0.6%，即约 220 点。</blockquote> Such a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.<blockquote>这样的上涨将使美国股市领头羊达到 36,040 点左右，而 10 月份收盘价为 35,820 点。你希望更多吗？毕竟，道琼斯指数在10月份上涨了近6%。</blockquote> You shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.<blockquote>你不应该感到惊讶。道琼斯指数本月的预期涨幅与日历上其他月份相同。11月份没有理由比历史平均水平更好或更差。</blockquote> It’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.<blockquote>有必要指出这一点，以反击华尔街那些挖掘历史数据寻找 “不可思议 ”季节模式的人。我们可以从他们的努力中学到的唯一真正的投资经验是，如果你足够长时间和努力地折磨数据，你可以让它说几乎任何话。</blockquote> Consider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”<blockquote>想想华尔街一家大公司的首席投资官上周在给客户的电子邮件中的说法： “从历史上看，11 月一直相当强劲。事实上，自 1950 年以来，在过去 10 年里，11 月一直是一年中最好的月份，而在过去 20 年和大选后的一年里，11 月一直排名第二。11 月是一年中最好的月份，但它似乎并没有你想象的那么受欢迎。我们都认为十二月是最好的月份，但实际上十一月更好，也没有什么大张旗鼓的。”</blockquote> This raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?<blockquote>这引发了几个危险信号。为什么选择1950年以来的时期，而不是1960年或1940年？为什么只关注过去10年或20年，而不是过去13年、23年或27年？</blockquote> Unless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.<blockquote>除非有令人信服的理论理由关注历史数据的子集，否则这样做表明故意的数据挖掘正在进行。</blockquote> The Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th&nbsp;for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.<blockquote>道琼斯指数为投资者提供可追溯到 1896 年 5 月创建的月度数据。在随后的 125 年里，11 月份的平均回报率在所有年份中排名第 5，如下图所示。11 月份略高于平均水平，但没有达到统计学家在确定模式是否真实时经常使用的 95% 置信水平。事实上，还差得很远。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81a13b9bba8ec5e47cf1c0ed3172447f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"471\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><blockquote></blockquote> How about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th&nbsp;place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.<blockquote>11月是后总统选举年第二好的月份怎么样？同样，这只适用于<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">一</a>历史数据的子集。纵观道琼斯指数的整个历史，11 月份的平均表现在总统大选后的几年中排名第 6。也就是说，它在这样的年份中的表现排名实际上比整个样本中略差。</blockquote> I don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.<blockquote>我无意挑剔这位华尔街知名首席信息官，这也是我不点名的原因。他实际上有很好的伙伴。</blockquote> Playing the odds<blockquote>碰碰运气</blockquote> There’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.<blockquote>除了缺乏统计意义之外，这种数据挖掘还有一个更根本的问题： 在对季节性模式下注时，要想让历史赔率合理地对你有利，你必须连续多次下注--至少几十次。因此，当押注一个每年只出现一次的模式时，明智的押注会持续几十年。任何一年成功的几率都只比抛硬币高。</blockquote> In all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.<blockquote>例如，自1896年以来的所有11月，道琼斯指数上涨了63%。即使假设未来将像过去一样，押注股市将在 11 月份上涨也是错误的，每三年中就有一年以上。这样的风险太大了，不足以证明谨慎是合理的。</blockquote> Ideally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.<blockquote>理想情况下，从统计学的角度来看，您可以找到极其短期的具有统计意义的模式。这将允许你，即使是相对较短的持有期，在这些模式上下注足够多的次数，以获得对你有利的赔率。</blockquote> This, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&amp;P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)<blockquote>例如，这就是 Renaissance Technologies 取得巨大成功的 Medallion 基金背后的秘密，该基金（即使扣除费用）在 1988 年至 2018 年间以令人难以置信的 39.2% 年化回报率击败标准普尔 500SPX +0.37%。（该基金不对外部投资者开放。）</blockquote> Brad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.<blockquote>加州大学洛杉矶分校名誉教授布拉德-康奈尔（Brad Cornell）报告称，Medallion 基金任何一笔交易的成功率都是 50.75%，仅略高于 50%。但当与高频交易相结合时，这些赔率足以产生高利润的策略。康奈尔写道：“Medallion 的 “战略包括不断开设和回补数千个短期头寸，包括多头和空头.接管数百万笔交易，其中 [50.75%] 的比例使该公司赚取了数十亿美元。”</blockquote> Remember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.<blockquote>下次你读到所谓的股市季节性模式时，请记住这一点。即使这种模式具有统计学意义（这种情况很少见），从长远来看也不会对你有太大帮助。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page\">Market Wacth</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/wall-street-will-tell-you-that-stocks-shine-in-november-but-heres-the-unvarnished-truth-11635872739?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156505839","content_text":"November likely will be a good month for the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.56%,which can be expected to gain 0.6%, or about 220 points.\nSuch a gain would take the U.S. stock market bellwether to around the 36,040 level, versus the 35,820 level at which it finished the month of October. Were you hoping for more? After all, the Dow rose almost 6% in October.\nYou shouldn’t be surprised. The Dow’s expected gain this month is the same as it is every other month of the calendar. There is no reason for November to be any better or worse than the historical average.\nIt’s important to point this out to counter those on Wall Street who mine the historical data in search of “uncanny” seasonal patterns. The only real investment lesson we can learn from their efforts is that if you torture the data long and hard enough you can make it say almost anything.\nConsider the claims that the chief investment officer of a major Wall Street firm emailed to clients last week: “November has been quite strong historically. In fact, since 1950, and the past 10 years, it is the best month of the year, while it ranks second over the past 20 years and during a post-election year. November is the best month of the year, but it doesn’t seem to get nearly as much love as you’d think. We all assume December is the best month, but November is actually better and gets very little fanfare.”\nThis raises several red flags. Why choose the period since 1950, as opposed to, say, 1960 or 1940? Why focus on just the past 10- or 20 years and not the past 13 or 23 or 27?\nUnless there is a compelling theoretical reason to focus on a subset of the historical data, doing so suggests that deliberate data mining is going on.\nThe Dow offers investors monthly data extending back to its creation in May 1896. Over the ensuing 125 years, November’s average return ranks 5th for all years, as you can see in the chart below. November is slightly above average, but not at the 95% confidence level that statisticians often use when determining if a pattern is genuine. In fact, it isn’t even close.\n\nHow about November being the second-best month in post-presidential election years? Again, this is true for only one subset of the historical data. Viewed over the Dow’s entire history, November is in 6th place for average performance during post-presidential election years. In other words, its performance rank in such years is actually slightly worse than in the entire sample.\nI don’t mean to pick on this particular well-known Wall Street CIO, which is why I am not naming him. He actually is in good company.\nPlaying the odds\nThere’s an even more fundamental problem with this data mining, beyond their lack of statistical significance: To get historical odds reasonably in your favor when betting on a seasonal pattern, you would have to bet on it consistently many times in a row — several dozen at a minimum. So when betting on a pattern that comes around only once every year, the intelligent bet lasts several decades. The odds of success in any given year are only barely above a coin flip.\nIn all Novembers since 1896, for example, the Dow has risen 63% of the time. Even assuming the future will be like the past, a bet that the stock market will gain ground in November will be wrong slightly more than one out of every three years. That’s far too much risk to justify throwing caution to the wind.\nIdeally, from a statistical point of view, you can find statistically significant patterns that are extremely short term. That would allow you, with even a relatively brief holding period, to bet on those patterns a sufficient number of times to get the odds decently in your favor.\nThis, for example, is the secret behind the phenomenally successful Medallion Fund, from Renaissance Technologies, which (even after fees) beat the S&P 500SPX,+0.37%between 1988 and 2018 by the incredible margin of 39.2% annualized return to 10.0%. (The fund is not available to outside investors.)\nBrad Cornell, a professor emeritus at UCLA, reportsthat the odds of success of any of Medallion Fund’s individual trades have been 50.75%, only slightly higher than 50%. But when coupled with high-frequency trading, those odds are enough to produce a highly profitable strategy. Medallion’s “strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short… Taken over millions of trades that [50.75%] percentage allowed the firm to make billions,” Cornell wrote.\nRemember this the next time you read about an alleged seasonal pattern in the stock market. Even when that pattern is statistically significant, which is rare, it won’t help you much over the long term.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6504476,"gmtCreate":1636414049214,"gmtModify":1636414049244,"authorId":3567307840510045,"author":{"id":3567307840510045,"idStr":"3567307840510045","authorId":3567307840510045,"name":"JeremyKok","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/01b03a485f83b6b2615fad8ac9b87bf4","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845247975,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","text":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","html":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you."},{"id":6496261,"gmtCreate":1636350980176,"gmtModify":1636350980270,"authorId":3576220386239608,"author":{"id":3576220386239608,"idStr":"3576220386239608","authorId":3576220386239608,"name":"TTH4Legs","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":845247975,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Liked","text":"Liked","html":"Liked"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":175,"commentSize":13,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":6,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}