Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control

CNN Business2021-03-24

London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

151

Genekun
·2021-03-25
Where is the risk? All stocks are hammered during this selldown
回复
点赞
举报
armypanda90
·2021-03-25
Seems like the new normal
回复
点赞
举报
Jinkachu
·2021-03-25
Like and share
回复
2
举报
收起
- Pecktian78:
  Gg
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
hoa
·2021-03-25
Spac hyped too much too fast recently
回复
4
举报
JFK
·2021-03-25
Good.
回复
2
举报
schipperde
·2021-03-25
Can help like n comment?
回复
3
举报
收起
- FuLong:
  ok
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- SSVC:
  [强][握手]
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- JFK:
  Ok
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
Phoebella
·2021-03-25
Hmm
回复
3
举报
Donovon
·2021-03-25
Like can comment pls
回复
5
举报
收起
- Joanne93:
  Ok
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- Donovon:
  Thanks
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
SilverSoul
·2021-03-25
Support SPAC!
回复
5
举报
收起
- hoa:
  yah i still have a number of spac havent get out
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
eda
·2021-03-25
kindly like and comment back. thanks
回复
2
举报
收起
- kokkeong:
  Sure
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- StonkerLL:
  here you go
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
Wilson_wtc
·2021-03-25
Wah
回复
3
举报
收起
- cc_goh:
  .....
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
naan
·2021-03-25
As though it is in control now..So much roller coaster drive on all spac stocks last 3 months
回复
1
举报
rDj
·2021-03-25
Like and comment pls
回复
5
举报
收起
- TraderGoh:
  Comment
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- KopiLim:
  For me too
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- rDj:
  👍
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
AngelFang
·2021-03-25
Say hi pls
回复
4
举报
收起
- KopiLim:
  Hi
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
Terry1989
·2021-03-25
Be greedy and one day, you will lose
回复
3
举报
Stephen_Ong
·2021-03-25
Like n comment
回复
1
举报
收起
- AngelFang:
  hi
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- AzuNyaa:
  liked. comment back too :)
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
IamBolt
·2021-03-25
Like and comment
回复
2
举报
收起
- Gablcm:
  Comented
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
ToMars
·2021-03-25
Comment pls
回复
1
举报
收起
- AzuNyaa:
  comment back too :)
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- ToMars:
  Ok comment again tks
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
MaxWin
·2021-03-25
I love the Moon
回复
4
举报
收起
- alexteoh90:
  comment me
  2021-03-25
  回复
  举报
- MaxWin:
  me too
  2021-03-27
  回复
  举报
Glenna
·2021-03-25
spac has its own risk. pls comment and like
回复
点赞
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1146861973","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control","media":"CNN Business","content":"<div>\nLondon (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a...\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 23:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html>CNN Business</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nLondon (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a...\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":".DJI","symbol_name":"道琼斯","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","article_id":"1146861973","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"cnn.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"translate_title":"如果SPAC狂乱失控，谁会有危险","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9},"content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":351777887,"gmtCreate":1616637143549,"gmtModify":1634524798941,"author":{"id":"3562062018050031","authorId":"3562062018050031","name":"Genekun","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb91ce7286a4dd47ea48415366d485f","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3562062018050031","idStr":"3562062018050031"},"htmlText":"Where is the risk? All stocks are hammered during this selldown","listText":"Where is the risk? All stocks are hammered during this selldown","text":"Where is the risk? All stocks are hammered during this selldown","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351777887","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351712408,"gmtCreate":1616633034604,"gmtModify":1634524837390,"author":{"id":"3576729415516509","authorId":"3576729415516509","name":"armypanda90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e4f2e0a614b36c8b5360e771c2deb6c","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3576729415516509","idStr":"3576729415516509"},"htmlText":"Seems like the new normal&nbsp;","listText":"Seems like the new normal&nbsp;","text":"Seems like the new normal","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351712408","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351790033,"gmtCreate":1616631500922,"gmtModify":1634524856497,"author":{"id":"3569530406935035","authorId":"3569530406935035","name":"Jinkachu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a47cb60ff4f5df9c8eac85aa6198baa0","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3569530406935035","idStr":"3569530406935035"},"htmlText":"Like and share&nbsp;","listText":"Like and share&nbsp;","text":"Like and share","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351790033","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3876074,"gmtCreate":1616631750973,"gmtModify":1635749653381,"authorId":3575932937315728,"author":{"id":3575932937315728,"idStr":"3575932937315728","authorId":3575932937315728,"name":"Pecktian78","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8afb4149b569f2592b6f8cbc97605f98","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351790033,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Gg","text":"Gg","html":"Gg"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351704408,"gmtCreate":1616631369604,"gmtModify":1634524857218,"author":{"id":"3576020103442242","authorId":"3576020103442242","name":"hoa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fde20263e39879236fafd316b76c363","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3576020103442242","idStr":"3576020103442242"},"htmlText":"Spac hyped too much too fast recently","listText":"Spac hyped too much too fast recently","text":"Spac hyped too much too fast recently","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351704408","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351702526,"gmtCreate":1616631214865,"gmtModify":1634524858838,"author":{"id":"3567221235003553","authorId":"3567221235003553","name":"JFK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8cdaf8b81ae245f2f2ea5ff303a6722","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3567221235003553","idStr":"3567221235003553"},"htmlText":"Good.&nbsp;","listText":"Good.&nbsp;","text":"Good.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351702526","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351477221,"gmtCreate":1616630816563,"gmtModify":1634524862750,"author":{"id":"3575256482663287","authorId":"3575256482663287","name":"schipperde","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a4e4121277bf6de1807fa76d4c1d390","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575256482663287","idStr":"3575256482663287"},"htmlText":"Can help like n comment?","listText":"Can help like n comment?","text":"Can help like n comment?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351477221","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875919,"gmtCreate":1616631044475,"gmtModify":1635749667028,"authorId":3570016243492689,"author":{"id":3570016243492689,"idStr":"3570016243492689","authorId":3570016243492689,"name":"FuLong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81ca80f2bb5557af545733b53fd23c09","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351477221,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"},{"id":3875941,"gmtCreate":1616631181554,"gmtModify":1635749665195,"authorId":3574906731000207,"author":{"id":3574906731000207,"idStr":"3574906731000207","authorId":3574906731000207,"name":"SSVC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/545a5ea462ff4ac7cc100bd3d8d97f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351477221,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[强][握手]","text":"[强][握手]","html":"[强][握手]"},{"id":3875950,"gmtCreate":1616631207633,"gmtModify":1635749664693,"authorId":3567221235003553,"author":{"id":3567221235003553,"idStr":"3567221235003553","authorId":3567221235003553,"name":"JFK","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8cdaf8b81ae245f2f2ea5ff303a6722","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351477221,"type":1,"supId":3875919,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351475511,"gmtCreate":1616630705833,"gmtModify":1634524864134,"author":{"id":"3559192645447375","authorId":"3559192645447375","name":"Phoebella","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c39afad3d430848c955620f39285f7b8","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3559192645447375","idStr":"3559192645447375"},"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351475511","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351478675,"gmtCreate":1616630508597,"gmtModify":1634524866210,"author":{"id":"3563067678826056","authorId":"3563067678826056","name":"Donovon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c49b742fc2acedd0736cd6626a70aee","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3563067678826056","idStr":"3563067678826056"},"htmlText":"Like can comment pls","listText":"Like can comment pls","text":"Like can comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351478675","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875852,"gmtCreate":1616630610693,"gmtModify":1635749672208,"authorId":3573553710836358,"author":{"id":3573553710836358,"idStr":"3573553710836358","authorId":3573553710836358,"name":"Joanne93","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c967d9964ec9b441fa6dd9a144f939e","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351478675,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"},{"id":3875874,"gmtCreate":1616630807343,"gmtModify":1635749670883,"authorId":3563067678826056,"author":{"id":3563067678826056,"idStr":"3563067678826056","authorId":3563067678826056,"name":"Donovon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c49b742fc2acedd0736cd6626a70aee","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351478675,"type":1,"supId":3875852,"prevId":0,"content":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","html":"Thanks"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351479279,"gmtCreate":1616630341391,"gmtModify":1634524867981,"author":{"id":"3563403277012456","authorId":"3563403277012456","name":"SilverSoul","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/692e9e2f198854f2b357459085e07d4f","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3563403277012456","idStr":"3563403277012456"},"htmlText":"Support SPAC!","listText":"Support SPAC!","text":"Support SPAC!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351479279","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875957,"gmtCreate":1616631234809,"gmtModify":1635749664066,"authorId":3576020103442242,"author":{"id":3576020103442242,"idStr":"3576020103442242","authorId":3576020103442242,"name":"hoa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fde20263e39879236fafd316b76c363","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351479279,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"yah i still have a number of spac havent get out","text":"yah i still have a number of spac havent get out","html":"yah i still have a number of spac havent get out"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351447969,"gmtCreate":1616630204151,"gmtModify":1634524869379,"author":{"id":"3569214676869217","authorId":"3569214676869217","name":"eda","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/909b8dea6c74db6f7d3a6a65052e290a","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3569214676869217","idStr":"3569214676869217"},"htmlText":"kindly like and comment back. thanks","listText":"kindly like and comment back. thanks","text":"kindly like and comment back. thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351447969","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875870,"gmtCreate":1616630777870,"gmtModify":1635749671359,"authorId":3571617352047146,"author":{"id":3571617352047146,"idStr":"3571617352047146","authorId":3571617352047146,"name":"kokkeong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaa42aa3cca43a0150f6bc4498596541","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351447969,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Sure","text":"Sure","html":"Sure"},{"id":3879470,"gmtCreate":1616660730382,"gmtModify":1635749433553,"authorId":3561713422683896,"author":{"id":3561713422683896,"idStr":"3561713422683896","authorId":3561713422683896,"name":"StonkerLL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eaf902e5c3ab78318f8b9d33f5a68e35","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351447969,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"here you go","text":"here you go","html":"here you go"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351444847,"gmtCreate":1616630175589,"gmtModify":1634524869858,"author":{"id":"3570525515751138","authorId":"3570525515751138","name":"Wilson_wtc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ecf77d842c90dbab7220526d5ece0a2","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3570525515751138","idStr":"3570525515751138"},"htmlText":"Wah","listText":"Wah","text":"Wah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351444847","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875788,"gmtCreate":1616630306678,"gmtModify":1635749677067,"authorId":3566635991278474,"author":{"id":3566635991278474,"idStr":"3566635991278474","authorId":3566635991278474,"name":"cc_goh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/300221534b209ac55e4284143d0dd5b8","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351444847,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":".....","text":".....","html":"....."}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351442287,"gmtCreate":1616630116949,"gmtModify":1634524871157,"author":{"id":"3574400316429410","authorId":"3574400316429410","name":"naan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5846811c3194d2eaeac65a7165552bc1","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574400316429410","idStr":"3574400316429410"},"htmlText":"As though it is in control now..So much roller coaster drive on all spac stocks last 3 months&nbsp;","listText":"As though it is in control now..So much roller coaster drive on all spac stocks last 3 months&nbsp;","text":"As though it is in control now..So much roller coaster drive on all spac stocks last 3 months","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351442287","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351449169,"gmtCreate":1616629729651,"gmtModify":1634524874722,"author":{"id":"3560659454957997","authorId":"3560659454957997","name":"rDj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d780bed87fa959fa825e01587af3b59","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3560659454957997","idStr":"3560659454957997"},"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351449169","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875691,"gmtCreate":1616629769364,"gmtModify":1635749684506,"authorId":3568616560578435,"author":{"id":3568616560578435,"idStr":"3568616560578435","authorId":3568616560578435,"name":"TraderGoh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0e5c70687bfc0f59adc96289d156ad6","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351449169,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comment","text":"Comment","html":"Comment"},{"id":3875734,"gmtCreate":1616630020803,"gmtModify":1635749681535,"authorId":3562886608344748,"author":{"id":3562886608344748,"idStr":"3562886608344748","authorId":3562886608344748,"name":"KopiLim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fcef53a2e715c173a40fafa14a7fe6","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351449169,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"For me too","text":"For me too","html":"For me too"},{"id":3876517,"gmtCreate":1616634477654,"gmtModify":1635749618393,"authorId":3560659454957997,"author":{"id":3560659454957997,"idStr":"3560659454957997","authorId":3560659454957997,"name":"rDj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d780bed87fa959fa825e01587af3b59","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351449169,"type":1,"supId":3875734,"prevId":0,"content":"👍","text":"👍","html":"👍"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351440030,"gmtCreate":1616629641320,"gmtModify":1634524875559,"author":{"id":"3575957444191428","authorId":"3575957444191428","name":"AngelFang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1bcf4932e01688693d640f06c376e449","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575957444191428","idStr":"3575957444191428"},"htmlText":"Say hi pls","listText":"Say hi pls","text":"Say hi pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351440030","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875737,"gmtCreate":1616630028257,"gmtModify":1635749681284,"authorId":3562886608344748,"author":{"id":3562886608344748,"idStr":"3562886608344748","authorId":3562886608344748,"name":"KopiLim","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fcef53a2e715c173a40fafa14a7fe6","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351440030,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Hi","text":"Hi","html":"Hi"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351454424,"gmtCreate":1616629511468,"gmtModify":1631884063825,"author":{"id":"3568630624134613","authorId":"3568630624134613","name":"Terry1989","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8272a89e76043ea5cf409608f7f69586","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3568630624134613","idStr":"3568630624134613"},"htmlText":"Be greedy and one day, you will lose","listText":"Be greedy and one day, you will lose","text":"Be greedy and one day, you will lose","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351454424","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351458629,"gmtCreate":1616629149361,"gmtModify":1634524879251,"author":{"id":"3574855311502838","authorId":"3574855311502838","name":"Stephen_Ong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6007ebee17e54499c7c6f8d071e5d0fe","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574855311502838","idStr":"3574855311502838"},"htmlText":"Like n comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like n comment&nbsp;","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351458629","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875661,"gmtCreate":1616629616256,"gmtModify":1635749686242,"authorId":3575957444191428,"author":{"id":3575957444191428,"idStr":"3575957444191428","authorId":3575957444191428,"name":"AngelFang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1bcf4932e01688693d640f06c376e449","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351458629,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hi","text":"hi","html":"hi"},{"id":3875670,"gmtCreate":1616629665450,"gmtModify":1635749685761,"authorId":3560894228634455,"author":{"id":3560894228634455,"idStr":"3560894228634455","authorId":3560894228634455,"name":"AzuNyaa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e65996a02c73a885a74a5e91062fa07e","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351458629,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"liked. comment back too :)","text":"liked. comment back too :)","html":"liked. comment back too :)"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351451505,"gmtCreate":1616629084207,"gmtModify":1634524880089,"author":{"id":"3577616645019427","authorId":"3577616645019427","name":"IamBolt","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577616645019427","idStr":"3577616645019427"},"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351451505","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875625,"gmtCreate":1616629340659,"gmtModify":1635749688594,"authorId":3575234021908444,"author":{"id":3575234021908444,"idStr":"3575234021908444","authorId":3575234021908444,"name":"Gablcm","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c74534439efb63d24fa3da74d69426cb","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351451505,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Comented ","text":"Comented ","html":"Comented "}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351453245,"gmtCreate":1616629005287,"gmtModify":1634524880571,"author":{"id":"3570092809336734","authorId":"3570092809336734","name":"ToMars","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cad4ddeab0622dd29ed1d7c76c750b8","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3570092809336734","idStr":"3570092809336734"},"htmlText":"Comment pls","listText":"Comment pls","text":"Comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351453245","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3875672,"gmtCreate":1616629671340,"gmtModify":1635749685511,"authorId":3560894228634455,"author":{"id":3560894228634455,"idStr":"3560894228634455","authorId":3560894228634455,"name":"AzuNyaa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e65996a02c73a885a74a5e91062fa07e","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351453245,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"comment back too :)","text":"comment back too :)","html":"comment back too :)"},{"id":3877646,"gmtCreate":1616642701000,"gmtModify":1635749543558,"authorId":3570092809336734,"author":{"id":3570092809336734,"idStr":"3570092809336734","authorId":3570092809336734,"name":"ToMars","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cad4ddeab0622dd29ed1d7c76c750b8","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351453245,"type":1,"supId":3875672,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok comment again tks","text":"Ok comment again tks","html":"Ok comment again tks"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351453643,"gmtCreate":1616628985782,"gmtModify":1634524880692,"author":{"id":"3563311381284357","authorId":"3563311381284357","name":"MaxWin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7681dcc0f2b046cc74cca2972ae6fc3","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3563311381284357","idStr":"3563311381284357"},"htmlText":"I love the Moon","listText":"I love the Moon","text":"I love the Moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351453643","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":3876327,"gmtCreate":1616632991378,"gmtModify":1635749633750,"authorId":3555506077280254,"author":{"id":3555506077280254,"idStr":"3555506077280254","authorId":3555506077280254,"name":"alexteoh90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0820705d37ed3954c9e6d6db9f611e25","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351453643,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"comment me","text":"comment me","html":"comment me"},{"id":3900725,"gmtCreate":1616842228406,"gmtModify":1635748305347,"authorId":3563311381284357,"author":{"id":3563311381284357,"idStr":"3563311381284357","authorId":3563311381284357,"name":"MaxWin","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7681dcc0f2b046cc74cca2972ae6fc3","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":351453643,"type":1,"supId":3876327,"prevId":0,"content":"me too","text":"me too","html":"me too"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":351424818,"gmtCreate":1616628695434,"gmtModify":1634524884492,"author":{"id":"3570769377369254","authorId":"3570769377369254","name":"Glenna","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8cb1540811be40c4d05341502c35498c","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3570769377369254","idStr":"3570769377369254"},"htmlText":"spac has its own risk. pls comment and like","listText":"spac has its own risk. pls comment and like","text":"spac has its own risk. pls comment and like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351424818","repostId":1146861973,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146861973","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616599584,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146861973?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-24 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146861973","media":"CNN Business","summary":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall ","content":"London (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho's at risk if the SPAC frenzy spins out of control<blockquote>如果SPAC的狂热失控，谁会面临风险</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-03-24 23:26\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nLondon (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.<blockquote>伦敦（CNN商业）——整整一年前，当世界陷入致命的大流行时，华尔街将对Covid-19的担忧抛在了一边。这引发了一波市场兴奋，此后引发了不寻常活动的繁荣，从围绕游戏驿站股票的非理性炒作到比特币的大幅上涨。</blockquote> Sign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an&nbsp;increase of more than 2,000%&nbsp;compared to 2020.<blockquote>时代标志：市场狂热最显着的指标之一是特殊目的收购公司（SPAC）的爆炸式增长。所谓的“空白支票”公司允许投资者支持赞助商，然后寻找私人实体上市，这些公司在2021年筹集了数百亿美元，比2020年增长了2000%以上。</blockquote> The&nbsp;rich and famous&nbsp;have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.<blockquote>富人和名人纷纷参与其中，从比尔·阿克曼这样的金融家到科林·卡佩尼克和Jay-Z这样的运动员和名人。</blockquote> \"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William &amp; Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.<blockquote>“任何人都有一个，”威廉玛丽学院经济学兼职教授彼得·阿特沃特说。他将SPAC比作金融界的另一个热门配件——巴塔哥尼亚背心。</blockquote> More and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs&nbsp;just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.<blockquote>越来越多的人敲响了警钟。美国监管机构警告称，投资者不应仅仅因为有名人参与就支持SPAC。与此同时，根据S3 Partners的数据，卖空者对SPAC的兴趣激增，这表明越来越多的交易员认为这种兴奋被夸大了，股价注定会下跌。</blockquote> Step back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.<blockquote>退一步：如果特殊目的收购公司的狂热已经失控，谁来付出代价？专家警告说，并非每个人都会成为赢家，一些陷入疯狂的散户投资者可能会受到伤害。</blockquote> \"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>阿特沃特说：“赚快钱的时代感觉已经过去了。”</blockquote> One concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.<blockquote>一个担忧是，有太多的SPAC资金追逐数量有限的可靠收购目标。这可能会迫使所有者考虑收购可能无法满足高增长预期的不太成熟的公司，或者签订利润较低的协议。</blockquote> \"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"<blockquote>“每天都有大量SPAC被创建，”德勤合伙人兼SPAC负责人Will Braeutigam告诉我。“有这么多SPAC赞助商对同一家公司进行竞购，你认为可能存在的上行价值可能并不存在。”</blockquote> Guillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.<blockquote>摩根大通欧洲、中东和非洲并购联席主管Guillermo Baygual指出，并非所有SPAC都是平等的。他认为，市场的这一角落将“随着时间的推移成为一个更专业的资产类别”，因为投资者会区分拥有良好业绩记录的公司和那些只是为了利用这一时刻而创建的公司。</blockquote> In the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.<blockquote>阿特沃特表示，与此同时，缺乏洞察力的日常投资者可能会背黑锅。他指出，在收购目标宣布之前，人们就急于购买SPAC的股票。</blockquote> \"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.<blockquote>“你可能会认为投资者会等着看他们会买什么，”阿特沃特说。</blockquote> If a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.<blockquote>阿特沃特解释说，如果没有确定目标，初始投资者将获得每股10美元的标准收益。但渴望在交易前入场并在公开市场上支付每股20、30或40美元的投资者正在进行纯粹投机性的押注。</blockquote> Some SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.<blockquote>一些SPAC最终会成为成功的故事。但贝瓜尔警告说，它们并不都是确定的赌注。“投资者应该根据基本面做出投资决策，”他说。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/24/investing/premarket-stocks-trading/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146861973","content_text":"London (CNN Business) - Exactly one year ago, with the world in the grip of a deadly pandemic, Wall Street put its Covid-19 fears aside. That jumpstarted a wave of market euphoria that has since fed a boom in unusual activity, from the irrational hype around GameStop shares to a huge bitcoin rally.\nSign of the times: Among the most notable indicators of market mania has been the explosion of special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. So-called \"blank check\" firms, which allow investors to back sponsors that then hunt for a private entity to take public, have raised tens of billions of dollars in 2021, an increase of more than 2,000% compared to 2020.\nThe rich and famous have rushed to get involved, from finance types like Bill Ackman to athletes and celebrities such as Colin Kaepernick and Jay-Z.\n\"Anybody who's anybody has one,\" said Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor of economics at William & Mary. He compared SPACs to another hot accessory in the world of finance — a Patagonia vest.\nMore and more people are sounding the alarm. US regulators have warned that investors shouldn't back SPACs just because there are celebrities attached. Meanwhile, short seller interest in SPACs has jumped, according to data from S3 Partners, indicating that a growing number of traders think the excitement is overblown and share prices are destined to fall.\nStep back: If the SPAC frenzy has gotten out of hand, who pays the price? Experts caution that not everyone will emerge a winner — and some retail investors swept up in the madness could get hurt.\n\"The time for quick money feels like it's now behind us,\" Atwater said.\nOne concern is that there's simply too much SPAC money chasing a limited number of solid takeover targets. That could force owners to consider acquiring less mature companies that may not meet lofty expectations for growth, or to enter into agreements that are less profitable.\n\"There is a tremendous number of SPACs being created every day,\" Will Braeutigam, a partner and SPAC leader at Deloitte, told me. \"With so many SPAC sponsors out there bidding on the same companies, the upside value that you think may be there may not be there.\"\nGuillermo Baygual, co-head of mergers and acquisitions for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at JPMorgan Chase, notes that not all SPACs are created equal. He believes this corner of the market will \"become a more professional asset class over time,\" as investors distinguish between firms with a proven track records and those created just to take advantage of the moment.\nIn the meantime, everyday investors that haven't been discerning could be left holding the bag, according to Atwater. He pointed to a rush to buy shares of SPACs before takeover targets are even announced.\n\"You would think investors would wait to see what [they] buy,\" Atwater said.\nIf a target isn't identified, initial investors will get their standard $10 per share back, Atwater explained. But eager investors that want to get in ahead of a deal and pay $20, $30 or $40 per share on the open market are making bets that are purely speculative.\nSome SPACs will end up as success stories. But Baygual cautioned that they're not all a sure bet. \"Investors should make their investment decisions on fundamentals,\" he said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":151,"commentSize":53,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}