Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law

zerohedge2021-06-08

Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

steven_tohhl
·2021-06-08
Amazon expensive but reliable stock. Give a like and comment
回复
2
举报
收起
- steven_tohhl:
  yeah
  2021-06-08
  回复
  举报
- RladPdnjs:
  Agreed
  2021-06-08
  回复
  举报
Ktkw
·2021-06-08
Yuppp
回复
1
举报
Wanzura
·2021-06-08
Excellent
回复
点赞
举报
mantis
·2021-06-08
That’s good
回复
1
举报
Louis7779
·2021-06-08
wow
回复
2
举报
Deonc
·2021-06-08
Oh no
回复
1
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1145769660","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-08 15:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AMZN","symbol_name":"亚马逊","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","article_id":"1145769660","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"translate_title":"如果国际税收协定成为法律，亚马逊将被包括在内","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9},"content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":117669799,"gmtCreate":1623138616111,"gmtModify":1634036546906,"author":{"id":"3581623655917850","authorId":"3581623655917850","name":"steven_tohhl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8aa0a1a1a330f5dba66a57003463e6c","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581623655917850","authorIdStr":"3581623655917850"},"htmlText":"Amazon expensive but reliable stock. Give a like and comment","listText":"Amazon expensive but reliable stock. Give a like and comment","text":"Amazon expensive but reliable stock. Give a like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117669799","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":4630430,"gmtCreate":1623138624491,"gmtModify":1635332380293,"authorId":3581623655917850,"author":{"id":3581623655917850,"idStr":"3581623655917850","authorId":3581623655917850,"name":"steven_tohhl","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8aa0a1a1a330f5dba66a57003463e6c","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":117669799,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>yeah</u>","text":"<u>yeah</u>","html":"<u>yeah</u>"},{"id":4630607,"gmtCreate":1623139642885,"gmtModify":1635332363519,"authorId":3583718308045678,"author":{"id":3583718308045678,"idStr":"3583718308045678","authorId":3583718308045678,"name":"RladPdnjs","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b245debbf7b2de28ff815ff679d9136","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":117669799,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Agreed","text":"Agreed","html":"Agreed"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":117688131,"gmtCreate":1623138037723,"gmtModify":1634036552111,"author":{"id":"3564917665277560","authorId":"3564917665277560","name":"Ktkw","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3b319f06c5f5672546acc9d6f02dec1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3564917665277560","authorIdStr":"3564917665277560"},"htmlText":"Yuppp","listText":"Yuppp","text":"Yuppp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117688131","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":117683697,"gmtCreate":1623137822019,"gmtModify":1634036553534,"author":{"id":"3586214007569715","authorId":"3586214007569715","name":"Wanzura","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586214007569715","authorIdStr":"3586214007569715"},"htmlText":"Excellent","listText":"Excellent","text":"Excellent","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117683697","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":117683024,"gmtCreate":1623137801168,"gmtModify":1634036553899,"author":{"id":"3586071331856012","authorId":"3586071331856012","name":"mantis","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d927d637d7d9327bda7d6e8cadc999c4","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586071331856012","authorIdStr":"3586071331856012"},"htmlText":"That’s good","listText":"That’s good","text":"That’s good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117683024","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":117617098,"gmtCreate":1623137562214,"gmtModify":1634036555966,"author":{"id":"3579095725705542","authorId":"3579095725705542","name":"Louis7779","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579095725705542","authorIdStr":"3579095725705542"},"htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117617098","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":117619815,"gmtCreate":1623136868537,"gmtModify":1634036560610,"author":{"id":"3569316529855154","authorId":"3569316529855154","name":"Deonc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9aa45dd2eb58357f6477dcfb99d1415","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3569316529855154","authorIdStr":"3569316529855154"},"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117619815","repostId":1145769660,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145769660","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623136668,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1145769660?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145769660","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would","content":"<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Will Be Covered If International Tax Deal Ever Becomes Law<blockquote>如果国际税收协议成为法律，亚马逊将受到保护</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 15:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价周一跌至盘中最低水平，有报道称亚马逊将被纳入周末达成的七国集团协议，以重组世界上一些最富裕国家的最低公司税（尽管美国领导的运动迫使不情愿的爱尔兰、新加坡和其他低税国家接受该提案仍然存在很大疑问）。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63ea33bdf16208237c06f5d7aa72b8f2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"324\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们周末从七国集团部长的公报中了解到的那样，该协议的一个支柱设想该税将适用于“最大、最赚钱的跨国企业超过10%的利润”。正如《卫报》在今天早些时候发表的一篇报道中指出的那样，由于亚马逊的低利润电子商务业务，该公司在技术上没有达到这一截止日期，该报道援引了一群专家的话说，他们警告说，如果不包括一些特殊安排，亚马逊可能会被排除在新的税收制度之外。</blockquote></p><p>   Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.  Of course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊是世界上最大的企业之一，市值为1.6万亿美元（1.1万亿英镑），2020年销售额为3860亿美元。2020年，一家卢森堡子公司对欧洲各地440亿欧元（380亿英镑）的销售收入缴纳了零公司税，这使得亚马逊成为推动全球税收制度改革的政界人士的主要目标。然而，其2020年的利润率仅为6.3%。它以非常低的利润率经营在线零售业务，部分原因是它进行了大量再投资，部分原因是为了获得市场份额。当然，在民主党掌权的情况下，很难想象伯尼·桑德斯或伊丽莎白·沃伦会让他们民粹主义攻击的共同目标亚马逊逃脱100年来最大规模的国际公司税改革。正如谢菲尔德大学管理学院会计学客座教授理查德·墨菲向《卫报》辩称的那样，10%的利润门槛是“不合适的”，因为不同公司的商业模式不同。他补充说，目前各国报告利润的方法“很容易被玩弄”。“除非他们掌握正确的细节，否则这可能是一个虚假的希望，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> On Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.</p><p><blockquote>周一下午，彭博社发表了一篇报道，援引两位接近谈判的匿名消息人士的话说，亚马逊将根据该协议缴纳新税，不过BBG补充说，如何实现这一目标的“细节”仍在讨论中。</blockquote></p><p> But from where things currently stand, it looks like &nbsp;negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.</p><p><blockquote>但从目前的情况来看，谈判代表似乎正在研究一种机制，该机制将剥离亚马逊利润更高的业务（如AWS云计算业务），而不是整个公司，后者的利润率受到大量投资和微薄利润的拖累。来自其电子商务和Prime服务。</blockquote></p><p> The company's shares dropped on the news:</p><p><blockquote>该公司股价因消息而下跌：</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6513fc08a7afd811c73f8827d56bb650\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">As for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.</p><p><blockquote>至于该协议是否会成为国际法，还有待观察。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/amazon-will-be-covered-if-international-tax-deal-ever-becomes-law","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145769660","content_text":"Amazon shares tumbled to their lowest levels of the session on Monday amid reports that Amazon would be included in a G-7 deal cemented over the weekend to retool the minimum corporate tax in some of the world's wealthiest nations (though a US-led movement to force the proposal down the throats of reluctant Ireland, Singapore and other low-tax nations remains very much in doubt).\nAs we learned over the weekend via a communique from G-7 ministers, a pillar of the deal envisaged that the tax would apply on \"profit exceeding a 10% margin for the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises.\" Thanks to Amazon's low-margin e-commerce business, the firm doesn't technically meet that cutoff, asthe Guardianpointed out in a story published earlier today that quoted a bevy of experts who warned that Amazon might be excluded from the new tax regime if some special arrangement weren't included.\n\n Amazon is one of the largest businesses in the world, with a market value of $1.6tn (£1.1tn) and sales of $386bn in 2020. A Luxembourg subsidiary paid zero corporation tax in 2020 on sales income from across Europe of €44bn (£38bn), making Amazon a prominent target for politicians campaigning for changes to the global tax system.However, its profit margin in 2020 was only 6.3%. It runs its online retail business at very low profit margins, partly because it reinvests heavily, and partly to gain market share.\n\nOf course, with the Democrats in the driver's seat, it's hard to imagine that Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren would allow Amazon, a common target for their populist attacks, to escape the greatest international corporate tax overhaul in 100 years. As Richard Murphy, visiting professor of accounting at the Sheffield University management school, argued to the Guardian, the 10% profits threshold was \"inappropriate\" because of different business models for different companies. He added that current approaches to reporting profits in each country were \"easily gamed.\" \"This could turn out to be a false hope unless they get the detail right,\" he said.\nOn Monday afternoon,Bloomberg published a reportciting two anonymous sources close to the talks that Amazon will be subject to new taxes under the deal, though BBG added that the \"particulars\" of how this will be accomplished are still being discussed.\nBut from where things currently stand, it looks like  negotiators are working on a mechanism that will hive off Amazon's more-profitable businesses (like its AWS cloud computing business) rather than the whole company, whose margins are weighed down by heavy investment and thin margins from its e-commerce and Prime services.\nThe company's shares dropped on the news:\nAs for whether the deal will ever become international law, well,that remains to be seen.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":19,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}