Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching

MarketWatch2021-08-06

S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

451

Jon1234
·2021-08-08
Bull!
回复
1
举报
SSVC
·2021-08-08
Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks
回复
4
举报
NgKenny
·2021-08-08
Good
回复
2
举报
fatfrog
·2021-08-08
Hmmm
回复
4
举报
fatfrog
·2021-08-08
Hmmm
回复
2
举报
Lourdu
·2021-08-08
Hi
回复
1
举报
hui1234567
·2021-08-07
edmund
回复
3
举报
收起
- sh99:
  have
  2021-08-07
  回复
  举报
Killies
·2021-08-07
Nice article written
回复
3
举报
收起
- hui1234567:
  duck
  2021-08-07
  回复
  举报
james_l
·2021-08-07
A correction is due
回复
3
举报
Ong2021
·2021-08-07
[Miser]
回复
2
举报
Michael8208
·2021-08-07
Everyone please be alert… take care of your portfolio…
回复
3
举报
Anna沈
·2021-08-07
[Miser]
回复
2
举报
Mhong
·2021-08-07
Like & comment
回复
1
举报
收起
- bobohaha:
  need a like also. thanks
  2021-08-07
  回复
  举报
HWChua1961
·2021-08-07
Free printing US$ will prop up the mkt till fed stops the press
回复
3
举报
收起
- kenong62:
  agreed
  2021-08-07
  回复
  举报
weiqiangng88
·2021-08-07
[惊讶]
回复
点赞
举报
BJLee
·2021-08-07
Hope it will keep rising
回复
2
举报
Boazzz
·2021-08-07
Parties are always hard to leave
回复
4
举报
DragonKC
·2021-08-07
When bear comes, we kill it. When bull comes we ride in it. Happy investing. 😀
回复
5
举报
BryanAGX
·2021-08-07
🔥
回复
5
举报
c2dfc0d
·2021-08-07
[Miser]
回复
3
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1124487485","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching","media":"MarketWatch","content":"<div>\nS&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1603348471595","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-06 21:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page>MarketWatch</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nS&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SPY","symbol_name":"标普500ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","article_id":"1124487485","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1603348471595","name":"MarketWatch"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"marketwatch.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"translate_title":"这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9},"content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":891552632,"gmtCreate":1628403012326,"gmtModify":1631889270823,"author":{"id":"3573821645459947","authorId":"3573821645459947","name":"Jon1234","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b8152ae43bb8b150654f871f2c6e1a34","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573821645459947","authorIdStr":"3573821645459947"},"htmlText":"Bull!","listText":"Bull!","text":"Bull!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891552632","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891663386,"gmtCreate":1628387128545,"gmtModify":1633751330934,"author":{"id":"3574906731000207","authorId":"3574906731000207","name":"SSVC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/545a5ea462ff4ac7cc100bd3d8d97f72","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574906731000207","authorIdStr":"3574906731000207"},"htmlText":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Hmm.. Appreciate your response and comments Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891663386","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891823004,"gmtCreate":1628380406908,"gmtModify":1631892044255,"author":{"id":"3582778356971864","authorId":"3582778356971864","name":"NgKenny","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4fdae3e0bdca8d3a33e7f9d619f0dc88","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582778356971864","authorIdStr":"3582778356971864"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891823004","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891867337,"gmtCreate":1628380187829,"gmtModify":1633751418681,"author":{"id":"3576002212190826","authorId":"3576002212190826","name":"fatfrog","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0e01d644d81db4190669298caebac0a","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576002212190826","authorIdStr":"3576002212190826"},"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891867337","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891867045,"gmtCreate":1628380171287,"gmtModify":1633751418925,"author":{"id":"3576002212190826","authorId":"3576002212190826","name":"fatfrog","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0e01d644d81db4190669298caebac0a","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576002212190826","authorIdStr":"3576002212190826"},"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891867045","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891170536,"gmtCreate":1628360318125,"gmtModify":1631888909591,"author":{"id":"4087982923993100","authorId":"4087982923993100","name":"Lourdu","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d4e1d3ba110a606f192f5d2b5ea74c56","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087982923993100","authorIdStr":"4087982923993100"},"htmlText":"Hi&nbsp;","listText":"Hi&nbsp;","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891170536","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891349160,"gmtCreate":1628340976550,"gmtModify":1631890241977,"author":{"id":"4087899267516000","authorId":"4087899267516000","name":"hui1234567","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f1ef5eb26f8ef01d38bcf417264003a1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087899267516000","authorIdStr":"4087899267516000"},"htmlText":"edmund","listText":"edmund","text":"edmund","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891349160","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5456438,"gmtCreate":1628340984427,"gmtModify":1635157642843,"authorId":3582013951378523,"author":{"id":3582013951378523,"idStr":"3582013951378523","authorId":3582013951378523,"name":"sh99","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95985dfcd15851145b63b9903fdb5bfc","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":891349160,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"have","text":"have","html":"have"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891304609,"gmtCreate":1628327366201,"gmtModify":1633751630629,"author":{"id":"3583385380082407","authorId":"3583385380082407","name":"Killies","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd2e832594a3238476b6b756eff9c4e2","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3583385380082407","authorIdStr":"3583385380082407"},"htmlText":"Nice article written&nbsp;","listText":"Nice article written&nbsp;","text":"Nice article written","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891304609","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5456436,"gmtCreate":1628340962051,"gmtModify":1635157643094,"authorId":4087899267516000,"author":{"id":4087899267516000,"idStr":"4087899267516000","authorId":4087899267516000,"name":"hui1234567","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f1ef5eb26f8ef01d38bcf417264003a1","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":891304609,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"duck","text":"duck","html":"duck"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891942486,"gmtCreate":1628323726645,"gmtModify":1633751646658,"author":{"id":"3563436875655076","authorId":"3563436875655076","name":"james_l","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7960ea5c640db331ff2de0da32f6a611","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3563436875655076","authorIdStr":"3563436875655076"},"htmlText":"A correction is due","listText":"A correction is due","text":"A correction is due","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891942486","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891956896,"gmtCreate":1628322036615,"gmtModify":1633751655237,"author":{"id":"4087873768935830","authorId":"4087873768935830","name":"Ong2021","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eec6b0f9969a9aab1913945a2c49ea24","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087873768935830","authorIdStr":"4087873768935830"},"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891956896","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891925059,"gmtCreate":1628320763271,"gmtModify":1631892768007,"author":{"id":"3578667349403450","authorId":"3578667349403450","name":"Michael8208","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578667349403450","authorIdStr":"3578667349403450"},"htmlText":"Everyone please be alert… take care of your portfolio…","listText":"Everyone please be alert… take care of your portfolio…","text":"Everyone please be alert… take care of your portfolio…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891925059","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891980879,"gmtCreate":1628316964491,"gmtModify":1633751685182,"author":{"id":"4091395568256400","authorId":"4091395568256400","name":"Anna沈","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/884e6959b76e66a0b81e29a5a7e1a7f4","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4091395568256400","authorIdStr":"4091395568256400"},"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891980879","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891999974,"gmtCreate":1628313694798,"gmtModify":1633751711162,"author":{"id":"3578449123371823","authorId":"3578449123371823","name":"Mhong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f1110c90505cf18cc129130892c4dc2a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578449123371823","authorIdStr":"3578449123371823"},"htmlText":"Like &amp; comment&nbsp;","listText":"Like &amp; comment&nbsp;","text":"Like & comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891999974","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5455817,"gmtCreate":1628330810066,"gmtModify":1635157695564,"authorId":4088603104259120,"author":{"id":4088603104259120,"idStr":"4088603104259120","authorId":4088603104259120,"name":"bobohaha","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b23ae1d6bca794790288fc7b9da69f0","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":891999974,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"need a like also. thanks","text":"need a like also. thanks","html":"need a like also. thanks"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891051204,"gmtCreate":1628309841008,"gmtModify":1631893178411,"author":{"id":"3576326749731922","authorId":"3576326749731922","name":"HWChua1961","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5727cfe181ab086ab906c710c081d8b","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3576326749731922","authorIdStr":"3576326749731922"},"htmlText":"Free printing US$ will prop up the mkt till fed stops the press","listText":"Free printing US$ will prop up the mkt till fed stops the press","text":"Free printing US$ will prop up the mkt till fed stops the press","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891051204","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5453905,"gmtCreate":1628310525886,"gmtModify":1631893178411,"authorId":3574928367638029,"author":{"id":3574928367638029,"idStr":"3574928367638029","authorId":3574928367638029,"name":"kenong62","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37fd00bd8cea11b8aa1aed6d9ddd9413","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":891051204,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agreed","text":"agreed","html":"agreed"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":891023666,"gmtCreate":1628309043955,"gmtModify":1633751751214,"author":{"id":"3579508469301590","authorId":"3579508469301590","name":"weiqiangng88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e42e77603a2d38f8e9d14295bf46174f","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579508469301590","authorIdStr":"3579508469301590"},"htmlText":"[惊讶]&nbsp;","listText":"[惊讶]&nbsp;","text":"[惊讶]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891023666","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":891093318,"gmtCreate":1628304847034,"gmtModify":1631884319691,"author":{"id":"4088307469081030","authorId":"4088307469081030","name":"BJLee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5951b94510b2fdbf4ec357e2a3c9ab7b","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4088307469081030","authorIdStr":"4088307469081030"},"htmlText":"Hope it will keep rising","listText":"Hope it will keep rising","text":"Hope it will keep rising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/891093318","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893778936,"gmtCreate":1628303677825,"gmtModify":1631892742779,"author":{"id":"3567934801618469","authorId":"3567934801618469","name":"Boazzz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/20d65f30895e0ab786dba18ca130d7c7","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3567934801618469","authorIdStr":"3567934801618469"},"htmlText":"Parties are always hard to leave","listText":"Parties are always hard to leave","text":"Parties are always hard to leave","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893778936","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893745918,"gmtCreate":1628303307334,"gmtModify":1633751815493,"author":{"id":"3577178099298017","authorId":"3577178099298017","name":"DragonKC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f90c63c67a4e5f91e9dc0159f5b853ab","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577178099298017","authorIdStr":"3577178099298017"},"htmlText":"When bear comes,&nbsp; we kill it. When bull comes we ride in it.&nbsp; Happy investing. 😀","listText":"When bear comes,&nbsp; we kill it. When bull comes we ride in it.&nbsp; Happy investing. 😀","text":"When bear comes, we kill it. When bull comes we ride in it. Happy investing. 😀","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893745918","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893720087,"gmtCreate":1628301734749,"gmtModify":1633751838767,"author":{"id":"3574646370578928","authorId":"3574646370578928","name":"BryanAGX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eae84f1b2ced261b8f6d4dc6f27782bf","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574646370578928","authorIdStr":"3574646370578928"},"htmlText":"🔥","listText":"🔥","text":"🔥","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893720087","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893787830,"gmtCreate":1628301183920,"gmtModify":1633751848054,"author":{"id":"4088141172972310","authorId":"4088141172972310","name":"c2dfc0d","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4088141172972310","authorIdStr":"4088141172972310"},"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893787830","repostId":1124487485,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124487485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628258241,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124487485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124487485","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a to","content":" S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s another sign the bull market is near a peak, and this one bears watching<blockquote>这是牛市接近顶峰的另一个迹象，值得关注</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-08-06 21:57\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n S&amp;P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red. The U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&amp;P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.<blockquote>标普500板块相对强弱排名亮红灯。根据基于标普500 SPX过去三个月回报率的领先指标，美国股市已接近顶部，+0.08%。</blockquote> Over the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.<blockquote>在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月里，出现了一种相当可预测的模式，即哪些行业表现最好，哪些行业表现最差。目前，这些行业近期相对实力的排名与这种模式相当接近。</blockquote> This is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.<blockquote>自5月中旬以来，这是一个很大的变化，正如我所报道的，当时这一领先指标没有检测到任何即将出现麻烦的迹象。当时过去三个月回报最好的行业并不是那些通常在顶部之前领先市场的行业，而过去三个月回报最差的行业也不是那些通常滞后的行业。</blockquote> Now, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.<blockquote>现在，相比之下，这些行业的相对实力排名与过去顶部出现的典型模式之间存在明显的相关性。</blockquote> According to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&amp;P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.<blockquote>根据Ned Davis Research进行的研究，公用事业、能源和金融是自1970年以来所有牛市最后三个月平均表现最差的标普500板块。如下图所示，这三个行业目前在过去三个月的回报率排名中处于或接近底部。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8465aa12910238871b10168546466b1f\" tg-width=\"2100\" tg-height=\"1272\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><blockquote></blockquote> In contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.<blockquote>相比之下，根据Ned Davis Research的数据，必需消费品、医疗保健和非必需消费品是在过去牛市顶部之前的三个月内平均表现最好的行业。如图所示，这三者在过去三个月的表现相对较好。</blockquote> To quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.<blockquote>为了量化行业相对强弱排名向看跌方向转变的程度，请考虑我计算的相关系数。这一统计数据的范围从1.0的高点（这意味着行业近期回报的排名与历史模式之间存在完美的一一对应关系）到负1.0（这意味着完美的负相关）。系数为零意味着不存在可检测的关系。</blockquote> In mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.<blockquote>5月中旬，这一系数为负0.66。相比之下，今天它是正的0.67。这一最新读数是我在定期监测该指标时看到的较高系数之一。</blockquote> Needless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.<blockquote>不用说，这两者（就此而言，任何指标都不能保证有效。有一次它是准确的，是在2015年4月，当时我关于该指标的专栏以“领先指标标志着市场顶部”为标题。根据内德·戴维斯研究公司维护的熊市日历，一个月后熊市开始了。当时盛行的相对强度排名与历史格局的相关系数为0.43；目前的读数更高，因此更加看跌。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-another-sign-the-bull-market-is-near-a-peak-and-this-one-bears-watching-11628233932?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124487485","content_text":"S&P 500 sectors’ relative strength rankings are flashing red.\n\nThe U.S. stock market is nearing a top, according to a leading indicator that is based on the trailing three-month returns of the S&P 500 SPX, +0.08% sectors.\nOver the three months prior to past bull-market tops, a fairly predictable pattern emerged of which sectors performed best and which fared worst. Currently, a ranking of the sectors’ recent relative strength lines up fairly close with that pattern.\nThis is a big change since mid-May when, as I reported, this leading indicator was not detecting any signs of imminent trouble. The sectors with the best trailing three-month returns at that time were not those that typically lead the market prior to tops, and the sectors with the worst trailing three-month returns were not those that typically lag.\nNow, in contrast, there is a distinct correlation between the sectors’ relative strength ranking and the typical pattern that appeared in past tops.\nAccording to research conducted by Ned Davis Research, Utilities, Energy and Financials are the S&P 500 sectors that have performed the worst, on average, in the final three months of all bull markets since 1970. As is clear in the chart below, these three sectors now are at or near the bottom in a ranking of trailing three-month returns.\n\nIn contrast, according to Ned Davis Research, Consumer Staples, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary are the sectors that have performed the best, on average, over the three months prior to past bull market tops. As the chart shows, these three have performed relatively well over the past three months.\nTo quantify how much the sector relative strength rankings have shifted in a bearish direction, consider the correlation coefficients that I calculated. This statistic ranges from a high of 1.0 (which would mean that there is a perfect one-to-one correspondence between a ranking of the sectors’ recent returns and the historical pattern) to minus 1.0 (which would mean a perfectly inverse correlation). A coefficient of zero would mean that there is no detectable relationship.\nIn mid-May, this coefficient stood at a significantly negative minus 0.66. Today, in contrast, it is a positive 0.67. This latest reading is one of the higher coefficients I’ve seen from my periodic monitoring of this indicator.\nNeedless to say, neither this (nor any indicator, for that matter) is guaranteed to work. One time that it was accurate was in April 2015, when my column on this indicator ran under the headline “leading indicators signal a market top.” A bear market began one month later, according to the bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research. The correlation coefficient between the relative strength ranking that then prevailed and the historical pattern stood at 0.43; the current reading is higher and so even more bearish.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":451,"commentSize":66,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}