Howard Marks: "We Are In An Everything Bubble"_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Howard Marks: "We Are In An Everything Bubble"

zerohedge2021-08-06

The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, ...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

SeC
·2021-08-07
Stay cautious nevertheless
回复
2
举报
Alfred1007
·2021-08-06
Still have to invest or else inflation will erode your money
回复
1
举报
Dad123
·2021-08-06
Like and comment please
回复
1
举报
收起
- NCM:
  Ok
  2021-08-08
  回复
  举报
Chinleong
·2021-08-06
Do not buy good fundamental stocks when their price are high
回复
4
举报
收起
- dumdumdum:
  Ok
  2021-08-06
  回复
  举报
Shoko
·2021-08-06
Yes
回复
2
举报
Ping2joseph
·2021-08-06
Oops~
回复
1
举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1111284888","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"","media":"zerohedge","content":"<div>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-06 15:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble>zerohedge</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, ...\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":".DJI","symbol_name":"道琼斯","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","article_id":"1111284888","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"zerohedge.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"translate_title":"霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于万物泡沫中”","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9},"content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":893590847,"gmtCreate":1628274703089,"gmtModify":1633752060333,"author":{"id":"3582371848241817","authorId":"3582371848241817","name":"SeC","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a226cf90d6854e9178341c90697ce373","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582371848241817","authorIdStr":"3582371848241817"},"htmlText":"Stay cautious nevertheless","listText":"Stay cautious nevertheless","text":"Stay cautious nevertheless","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893590847","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893376050,"gmtCreate":1628241791070,"gmtModify":1633752311214,"author":{"id":"3570656625926041","authorId":"3570656625926041","name":"Alfred1007","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81d8406380cbc0525927f00a9510f2fa","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3570656625926041","authorIdStr":"3570656625926041"},"htmlText":"Still have to invest or else inflation will erode your money","listText":"Still have to invest or else inflation will erode your money","text":"Still have to invest or else inflation will erode your money","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893376050","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893306057,"gmtCreate":1628235318479,"gmtModify":1633752359068,"author":{"id":"3581623201234305","authorId":"3581623201234305","name":"Dad123","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac4d85018dddfaed97e09d27a019c74f","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581623201234305","authorIdStr":"3581623201234305"},"htmlText":"Like and comment please&nbsp;","listText":"Like and comment please&nbsp;","text":"Like and comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893306057","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5459249,"gmtCreate":1628386668754,"gmtModify":1635157362832,"authorId":3567832114052050,"author":{"id":3567832114052050,"idStr":"3567832114052050","authorId":3567832114052050,"name":"NCM","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd72c39fd9a998a91f641828e572613e","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":893306057,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893974578,"gmtCreate":1628234725794,"gmtModify":1631892674955,"author":{"id":"3559098973692807","authorId":"3559098973692807","name":"Chinleong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dbcd389c42e41aa06c692b423858c4c","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3559098973692807","authorIdStr":"3559098973692807"},"htmlText":"Do not buy good fundamental stocks when their price are high","listText":"Do not buy good fundamental stocks when their price are high","text":"Do not buy good fundamental stocks when their price are high","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893974578","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5444802,"gmtCreate":1628234826165,"gmtModify":1635158616548,"authorId":3575326657914583,"author":{"id":3575326657914583,"idStr":"3575326657914583","authorId":3575326657914583,"name":"dumdumdum","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":893974578,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893975242,"gmtCreate":1628234627186,"gmtModify":1631891015375,"author":{"id":"3574129486061678","authorId":"3574129486061678","name":"Shoko","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574129486061678","authorIdStr":"3574129486061678"},"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893975242","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":893972846,"gmtCreate":1628234490085,"gmtModify":1633752363647,"author":{"id":"3578387522492131","authorId":"3578387522492131","name":"Ping2joseph","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578387522492131","authorIdStr":"3578387522492131"},"htmlText":"Oops~&nbsp;","listText":"Oops~&nbsp;","text":"Oops~","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893972846","repostId":1111284888,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111284888","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628234254,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111284888?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111284888","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (an","content":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Howard Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHoward Marks: \"We Are In An Everything Bubble\"<blockquote>霍华德·马克斯：“我们正处于一切泡沫之中”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-08-06 15:17\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThe otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"<blockquote>否则被压抑和非常一个今天下午，夸张的霍华德·马克斯在交易柜台（也许还有马里纳·埃克尔斯大楼）引起了不小的轰动，这位橡树资本联合创始人在接受彭博社的埃里克·沙茨克(Erik Shatzker)采访时表示，这对大多数人来说是显而易见的——即使这会带来很高的职业风险在公开场合说——那”我们正处于一切泡沫之中“我今天没有说，但我们不要错过让利率重新浮动的机会。”</blockquote> \"The stock market is high and the S&amp;P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"<blockquote>“股市很高，标准普尔指数在4400点。去年3月是2200点。翻了一番。价格很高。房地产已经回来了。某些行业非常强劲，如基础设施、房地产、配送中心等。我们正处于一个低回报的世界。这是我们所见过的最低回报。”</blockquote> Looking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"<blockquote>看着他最喜欢的市场生命周期图表，马克斯说，虽然通常股票市场和经济周期是重合的，股票市场的高点接近经济的高点，反之亦然，但今天我们的股票价格很高，我们正处于经济周期的早期。“这很不寻常。你可以说这很糟糕，因为复苏才刚刚开始，股价已经很高了。”</blockquote> So what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"&nbsp; and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”<blockquote>那么应该发生什么呢？马克斯认为，美联储应该“不去管市场”，并“在一定程度上移除潘趣酒碗”，以便利率能够成为经济和参与者希望的样子，而不是美联储希望的样子。马克斯提醒观众，美联储错过了2018年加息的机会——当时市场下跌将美联储拖了回来——他表示“我们不要错过让利率回升的机会”，美联储不应该因为担心而退缩。另一场“缩减恐慌”。</blockquote> \"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"<blockquote>“这就像对待你的孩子一样。作为父母，我们不能害怕孩子发脾气。美联储不能害怕投资者发脾气。美联储必须为经济做正确的事情。它的工作不是为投资者赚钱。当经济强劲时，你必须停止紧急措施并让利率回升。”</blockquote> But far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.<blockquote>但他并不担心让每个美国中产阶级生活难以忍受的飙升的物价（得益于美联储爆炸式的资产负债表），而是担心他的金融行业同事；也就是说，养老基金和许多其他机构投资者依赖于每年获得7%的回报，但当联邦基金利率为零时，这是不可能的。</blockquote> Of course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.<blockquote>当然，当利率为7%时，运行历史上杠杆率最高的经济是不可能的，但当利率崩溃时，我们相信霍华德将坐在远处的海滩上，赚取7%的收入。</blockquote> Today’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"<blockquote>马克斯说，今天的信贷市场提供了“我们所见过的最低回报”。仍然有可能获得比投资美国国债更多的收益，但这越来越难了。“从来没有这么没有回报过。”</blockquote> Actually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.<blockquote>事实上，几百万罗宾汉会不敢苟同：由于市场上没有无风险回报，这意味着任何希望产生任何物质阿尔法的人都被迫追逐迷因，只要它们上涨，这就很好，但一旦它们像罗宾汉在昨天的伽马挤压后今天所做的那样暴跌，那将是灾难性的。但是，是的，毫无疑问，美联储已经打破了市场。我们的观点与霍华德的不同之处在于，我们绝对肯定，现在完全不可能取消美联储12年来对市场的中央计划和微观管理。回到2009年，将资产价格从货币政策中解救出来可能仍然可行，但现在为时已晚。</blockquote> Where we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.<blockquote>我们一致认为，他当然是对的：这确实是一个万物泡沫，这是我们从一开始就一直在说的。</blockquote> And indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the&nbsp;markets&nbsp;economy.<blockquote>值得注意的是，一年前去年的不良债务为1万亿美元，但自那以后，在美联储采取前所未有的措施稳定市场经济的帮助下，这一数字已降至仅1247亿美元。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/howard-marks-we-are-everything-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111284888","content_text":"The otherwise subdued and veryunhyperbolic Howard Marks caused quite a stir across trading desks (and perhaps the Marriner Eccles building) this afternoon, when speaking to Bloomberg's Erik Shatzker, the Oaktree co-founder said what has been obvious to most - even if it carries high career risk in saying it in public - that “we’re in an everything bubble\" adding that \"I don’t say today, but let’s not miss the opportunity to let the rates float back up.\"\n\"The stock market is high and the S&P is at 4,400. Last March 2,200. Doubled. Prices are high. Real estate has come back. Certain sectors are very strong like infrastructure, real estate, distribution centers and so forth. We are in a low return world. The lowest returns we've ever seen prospectively.\"\nLooking at his favorite Life Cycle of a market chart, Marks says that whereas normally the stock market and the economic cycles coincide, where the high in the stock market is close to the high in the economy and vice versa, today we have high stock prices and we are early in the economic cycle. \"That's unusual. You could say well this is bad because the recovery is nascent and stock prices are already high.\"\nSo what should happen? According to Marks, the Fed should \"leave the markets alone\", and \"remove the punch bowl somewhat\" so that interest rates can be what the economy and participants want them to be, not what the Fed wants them to be. Reminding viewers that the Fed missed an opportunity to raise rates in 2018 - when the market drop dragged the Fed right back in - Marks says \"let's not miss the opportunity to let rates go back up\"  and the Fed should not hold back out of fear of another “taper tantrum.”\n\"It's like with your kids. As a parent we can't be afraid of our kids tantrums. The Fed can't be afraid of investors' tantrums. The Fed has to do the right thing for the economy. It's job is not to make money for investors.And when the economy is strong you have to stop emergency measures and let rates go back up.\"\nBut far from concern about the soaring prices (courtesy of the Fed's exploding balance sheet) that have made life for every middle-class American unbearable, his concern was for his fellow finance professions; to wit, pension funds and many other institutional investors rely on getting 7% returns every year, but that's impossible when the federal funds rate is zero.\nOf course, running the most overlevered economy in history will be impossible when rates are 7% but by the time it comes crashing down, we are confident that Howard will be sitting on a beach far away, earning 7%.\nToday’s credit markets offer “the lowest return we’ve ever seen, prospectively,” Marks said. It is still possible to make more than investing in U.S. Treasuries, but that is getting harder. “It’s never been this unrewarding.\"\nActually, a few million Robinhooders will beg to differ: with no risk-free returns left in the market, it means that anyone hoping to generate any material alpha is forced into chasing meme stonks which is great as long as they go up, but catastrophic once they plunge as Robinhood did today following yesterday's gamma squeeze. But yes, there is no disputing that the Fed has broken the market. Where our view differs with Howard's, is that we are absolutely certain that it is now completely impossible to undo 12 years of Fed central planning and micromanagement of markets. Back in 2009 it may still have been feasible to extricate asset prices from monetary policy, but now it is too late.\nWhere we agree is that he is of course, right: this is indeed an everything bubble, something we have been saying since inception.\nAnd indicatively, whereas one year ago there was $1 trillion in distressed debt last year, since then that number has plunged to just $124.7 billion, aided by the Federal Reserve’s unprecedented steps to steady the markets economy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":24,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}