Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?

Thestreet2021-12-03

The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

xuanxuan1104
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
点赞
举报
prestomanik
·2021-12-03
So what does this article mean...
回复
1
举报
crystaly
·2021-12-03
Like pls
回复
1
举报
SiewMailing
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
3
举报
收起
- Dollarvan:
  Ok
  2021-12-05
  回复
  举报
CS2
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
3
举报
ARIESan
·2021-12-03
Noooooo
回复
4
举报
收起
- CS2:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
andrewtingg
·2021-12-03
Like
回复
5
举报
收起
- tinacheekyle:
  ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
TTLZ
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
6
举报
收起
- andrewtingg:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
- TTLZ:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
Norico
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
6
举报
收起
- Norico:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
JustinOh
·2021-12-03
Like
回复
4
举报
收起
- crystaly:
  done
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
- BossBoss:
  done & please like back
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
indietro_
·2021-12-03
Ok
回复
4
举报
收起
- JustinOh:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
RonnieO
·2021-12-03
Good
回复
3
举报
收起
- indietro_:
  Ok
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报
QINGG
·2021-12-03
Like
回复
4
举报
收起
- AtwoZ:
  Like
  2021-12-03
  回复
  举报

热议股票

7x24

全部

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1107080300","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?","media":"Thestreet","content":"<div>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-03 10:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble><strong>Thestreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":".SPX","symbol_name":"S&P 500 Index","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","article_id":"1107080300","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"thestreet.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"translate_title":"市场的交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破灭前相同？","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9},"content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":601814427,"gmtCreate":1638507644575,"gmtModify":1638507644575,"author":{"id":"3585213315719138","authorId":"3585213315719138","name":"xuanxuan1104","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3585213315719138","authorIdStr":"3585213315719138"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601814427","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601159761,"gmtCreate":1638500308758,"gmtModify":1638500308758,"author":{"id":"3584407285056666","authorId":"3584407285056666","name":"prestomanik","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/843d2c80610b4ad2450a9b54a190b6ae","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3584407285056666","authorIdStr":"3584407285056666"},"htmlText":"So what does this article mean...","listText":"So what does this article mean...","text":"So what does this article mean...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601159761","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601121477,"gmtCreate":1638499626247,"gmtModify":1638499626372,"author":{"id":"4087870165979230","authorId":"4087870165979230","name":"crystaly","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087870165979230","authorIdStr":"4087870165979230"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601121477","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601129438,"gmtCreate":1638499459595,"gmtModify":1638499459595,"author":{"id":"4098273802374380","authorId":"4098273802374380","name":"SiewMailing","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4098273802374380","authorIdStr":"4098273802374380"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601129438","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6853769,"gmtCreate":1638686121165,"gmtModify":1638686121197,"authorId":3555014251535651,"author":{"id":3555014251535651,"idStr":"3555014251535651","authorId":3555014251535651,"name":"Dollarvan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0316ab12b442ee2cd79936de06de5089","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601129438,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601165903,"gmtCreate":1638499023994,"gmtModify":1638499028958,"author":{"id":"3563688986414344","authorId":"3563688986414344","name":"CS2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/615455e55d5ee6d62d6d1fbcbfa4e02a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3563688986414344","authorIdStr":"3563688986414344"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601165903","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601168261,"gmtCreate":1638498713079,"gmtModify":1638498716173,"author":{"id":"4087545408973980","authorId":"4087545408973980","name":"ARIESan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab7b9364a4791173d66fbb5fda8ef925","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087545408973980","authorIdStr":"4087545408973980"},"htmlText":"Noooooo","listText":"Noooooo","text":"Noooooo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601168261","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825582,"gmtCreate":1638499020495,"gmtModify":1638499020584,"authorId":3563688986414344,"author":{"id":3563688986414344,"idStr":"3563688986414344","authorId":3563688986414344,"name":"CS2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/615455e55d5ee6d62d6d1fbcbfa4e02a","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601168261,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601161654,"gmtCreate":1638498634662,"gmtModify":1638498714823,"author":{"id":"3569548778635529","authorId":"3569548778635529","name":"andrewtingg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d5e307692b89ed5e1743db3eef62fe5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3569548778635529","authorIdStr":"3569548778635529"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601161654","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825522,"gmtCreate":1638498722744,"gmtModify":1638498722774,"authorId":3575596393140561,"author":{"id":3575596393140561,"idStr":"3575596393140561","authorId":3575596393140561,"name":"tinacheekyle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d2373874b2bf69f2637ce056a6f56ada","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601161654,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601163344,"gmtCreate":1638498489007,"gmtModify":1638498489148,"author":{"id":"3581826176705129","authorId":"3581826176705129","name":"TTLZ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3285bfaae2742e85571cc7d44bad2420","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581826176705129","authorIdStr":"3581826176705129"},"htmlText":"Ok&nbsp;","listText":"Ok&nbsp;","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601163344","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825515,"gmtCreate":1638498647330,"gmtModify":1638498647366,"authorId":3569548778635529,"author":{"id":3569548778635529,"idStr":"3569548778635529","authorId":3569548778635529,"name":"andrewtingg","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d5e307692b89ed5e1743db3eef62fe5","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601163344,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Ok</u>","text":"<u>Ok</u>","html":"<u>Ok</u>"},{"id":6825468,"gmtCreate":1638498502925,"gmtModify":1638498502954,"authorId":3581826176705129,"author":{"id":3581826176705129,"idStr":"3581826176705129","authorId":3581826176705129,"name":"TTLZ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3285bfaae2742e85571cc7d44bad2420","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601163344,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok ","text":"Ok ","html":"Ok "}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601169818,"gmtCreate":1638498448690,"gmtModify":1638498448775,"author":{"id":"3581669463250045","authorId":"3581669463250045","name":"Norico","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a669233a6a5d1170dbe002df845aeb3a","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581669463250045","authorIdStr":"3581669463250045"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601169818","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6826545,"gmtCreate":1638503075363,"gmtModify":1638503075389,"authorId":3581669463250045,"author":{"id":3581669463250045,"idStr":"3581669463250045","authorId":3581669463250045,"name":"Norico","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a669233a6a5d1170dbe002df845aeb3a","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601169818,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601169377,"gmtCreate":1638498427426,"gmtModify":1638498427583,"author":{"id":"3574829133892207","authorId":"3574829133892207","name":"JustinOh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/999ecefe022ab8cb9f4c76c1f852fa86","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3574829133892207","authorIdStr":"3574829133892207"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601169377","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825712,"gmtCreate":1638499620159,"gmtModify":1638499620248,"authorId":4087870165979230,"author":{"id":4087870165979230,"idStr":"4087870165979230","authorId":4087870165979230,"name":"crystaly","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601169377,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>done</u>","text":"<u>done</u>","html":"<u>done</u>"},{"id":6825510,"gmtCreate":1638498626589,"gmtModify":1638498626620,"authorId":3580876358829077,"author":{"id":3580876358829077,"idStr":"3580876358829077","authorId":3580876358829077,"name":"BossBoss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2ebd21bfc3e2e2cd727e40dbfd87596","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601169377,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"done &amp; please like <u>back</u>","text":"done &amp; please like <u>back</u>","html":"done &amp; please like <u>back</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601160467,"gmtCreate":1638498420682,"gmtModify":1638498420802,"author":{"id":"3586255748151463","authorId":"3586255748151463","name":"indietro_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caebb6c2a70cbd2db563a3808f3d7b22","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586255748151463","authorIdStr":"3586255748151463"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601160467","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825453,"gmtCreate":1638498434243,"gmtModify":1638498434336,"authorId":3574829133892207,"author":{"id":3574829133892207,"idStr":"3574829133892207","authorId":3574829133892207,"name":"JustinOh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/999ecefe022ab8cb9f4c76c1f852fa86","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601160467,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601160639,"gmtCreate":1638498406796,"gmtModify":1638498406902,"author":{"id":"4088850777374920","authorId":"4088850777374920","name":"RonnieO","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1292a5981b699a40c70f37718afa2985","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4088850777374920","authorIdStr":"4088850777374920"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601160639","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825449,"gmtCreate":1638498425403,"gmtModify":1638498425435,"authorId":3586255748151463,"author":{"id":3586255748151463,"idStr":"3586255748151463","authorId":3586255748151463,"name":"indietro_","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caebb6c2a70cbd2db563a3808f3d7b22","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601160639,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Ok","text":"Ok","html":"Ok"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":601187361,"gmtCreate":1638498300009,"gmtModify":1638498329803,"author":{"id":"3573817267543490","authorId":"3573817267543490","name":"QINGG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce35fdb1dd66a012fd9571faa0ab4808","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573817267543490","authorIdStr":"3573817267543490"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601187361","repostId":1107080300,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107080300","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638498144,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107080300?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-03 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107080300","media":"Thestreet","summary":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the inte","content":"<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Market Trading in the Same Pattern It Followed Before the Dot-Com Bubble Burst?<blockquote>市场交易模式是否与互联网泡沫破裂前相同？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-03 10:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.</p><p><blockquote>一项新的分析认为，美国股市正在显示出一些与2000年互联网泡沫破裂前相同的交易模式，两个主要指数的交易规律相反。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;and Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数和纳斯达克综合指数在感恩节前连续四个交易日收盘方向相反，一个上涨，另一个下跌，回报率仅相差一个百分点。</blockquote></p><p> Such a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst</p><p><blockquote>马克·赫伯特（Mark Hulbert）在《市场观察》（Market Watch）上表示，这种分歧极其罕见，值得仔细研究，类似于2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前几周的模式</blockquote></p><p> Since the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.</p><p><blockquote>自1971年纳斯达克成立以来，这种分歧仅发生在22%的交易时段。</blockquote></p><p> On average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.</p><p><blockquote>平均而言，每五个交易日就会出现一次这样的背离，因此上周为期四天的走势引起了活跃市场参与者和历史学家的关注。</blockquote></p><p> In the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.</p><p><blockquote>Hulbert表示，在2000年3月互联网泡沫破裂前的几周内，超过一半的交易时段纳斯达克和道琼斯指数收盘。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/divergences-marked-dot-com-bubble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107080300","content_text":"The U.S. stock market is showing some of the same trading patterns that were evident before the internet bubble burst in 2000, a new analysis argues, with two major indices trading inversely regularly.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite have closed in opposite directions — with one being up and the other down at close — in four consecutive trading sessions before Thanksgiving, with only a single percentage point difference in their returns.\nSuch a divergence is extremely rare, according to Mark Hulbert, who makes the argument over at Market Watch that it deserves scrutiny, and is similar to a pattern seen in the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst\nSince the Nasdaq was created in 1971, that bifurcation has only occurred in 22% of trading sessions.\nOn average, there is such a divergence once every five sessions, so last week's four-day run has grabbed attention from active market players and historians.\nIn the weeks leading up to the March 2000 dot-com bubble burst, more than half the trading sessions saw the Nasdaq and Dow mix closes, according to Hulbert.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6825429,"gmtCreate":1638498339928,"gmtModify":1638498339957,"authorId":3586254379286032,"author":{"id":3586254379286032,"idStr":"3586254379286032","authorId":3586254379286032,"name":"AtwoZ","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7347da48f4f74369b5ff3a53a2e36a45","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":601187361,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Like</u>","text":"<u>Like</u>","html":"<u>Like</u>"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":55,"commentSize":13,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"isCrawlerRequest":true}