aprilialand的个人主页 - 老虎社区

aprilialand

aprilialand

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

339关注

26粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-07-29

pls like

Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today<blockquote>为什么AMD的股票今天走高</blockquote>

2021-11-09

up and up

NVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading<blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%</blockquote>

2021-11-02

great

Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>

2021-12-02

good

Grab debuts on Nasdaq, marking biggest Southeast Asia listing<blockquote>Grab在纳斯达克首次亮相，成为东南亚最大的上市公司</blockquote>

2021-11-20

buy and up..

Apple Is Touching Record Levels, How High Can It Go?<blockquote>苹果正在触及历史新高，它能走多高？</blockquote>

2021-09-04

pls like

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-08-21

pls like

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-15

like pls

GE and JNJ Aren't the Only Aging Companies That Could Benefit From a Breakup<blockquote>通用电气和强生并不是唯一可以从分拆中受益的老龄化公司</blockquote>

2021-11-06

liked

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-20

up and up

Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading as it released a new operating system "Dragon Lizard"<blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW发布新操作系统“龙蜥”盘前大涨近2%</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586853256703013","uuid":"3586853256703013","gmtCreate":1623759444335,"gmtModify":1631161597760,"name":"aprilialand","pinyin":"aprilialand","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":26,"headSize":339,"tweetSize":200,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.12","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.06","exceedPercentage":"60.36%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":694790462,"gmtCreate":1642112709060,"gmtModify":1642112709392,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694790462","repostId":"1105224732","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105224732","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1642086896,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105224732?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-01-13 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Airline stocks jumped in morning trading<blockquote>航空股早盘上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105224732","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Airline stocks jumped in morning trading. Delta Air Lines,Southwest Airlines,United Continental and ","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Airline stocks jumped in morning trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">Southwest Airlines</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UAL\">United Continental</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">American Airlines</a> rose between 2% and 5%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>航空股早盘上涨。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">西南航空</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UAL\">United Continental</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">美国航空公司</a>涨幅在2%至5%之间。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5337c1fa70a52ef20ee586624787937c\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1915\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Airline stocks jumped in morning trading<blockquote>航空股早盘上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAirline stocks jumped in morning trading<blockquote>航空股早盘上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2022-01-13 23:14</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Airline stocks jumped in morning trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">Delta Air Lines</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">Southwest Airlines</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UAL\">United Continental</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">American Airlines</a> rose between 2% and 5%.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>航空股早盘上涨。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DAL\">达美航空</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LUV\">西南航空</a>,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UAL\">United Continental</a>和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">美国航空公司</a>涨幅在2%至5%之间。</body></html></blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5337c1fa70a52ef20ee586624787937c\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1915\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4547":"WSB热门概念","DAL":"达美航空","AAL":"美国航空","UAL":"联合大陆航空","BK4500":"航空公司","BK4008":"航空公司","LUV":"西南航空"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105224732","content_text":"Airline stocks jumped in morning trading. Delta Air Lines,Southwest Airlines,United Continental and American Airlines rose between 2% and 5%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LUV":0.9,"DAL":0.9,"UAL":0.9,"AAL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2611,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":694278934,"gmtCreate":1642026472331,"gmtModify":1642026472628,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694278934","repostId":"1114732808","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":694630845,"gmtCreate":1641949279965,"gmtModify":1641949280337,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694630845","repostId":"2202787736","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3132,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":694150013,"gmtCreate":1641875326045,"gmtModify":1641875326345,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694150013","repostId":"2202277188","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3933,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":694930715,"gmtCreate":1641780258643,"gmtModify":1641780258927,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694930715","repostId":"1170286064","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2826,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":694087703,"gmtCreate":1641703090258,"gmtModify":1641703186053,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/694087703","repostId":"1198290127","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198290127","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1641702682,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198290127?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-01-09 12:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Apple Stock Reclaim $3 Trillion And Thrive In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价能否在2022年收回3万亿美元并蓬勃发展？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198290127","media":"TheStreet","summary":"A market cap of $3 trillion has, so far, proven to be a ceiling that Apple stock does not seem ready","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>A market cap of $3 trillion has, so far, proven to be a ceiling that Apple stock does not seem ready to break through yet. Can shares reclaim the milestone soon and head higher in 2022?</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>到目前为止，3万亿美元的市值已被证明是苹果股票似乎尚未准备好突破的上限。股价能否很快恢复里程碑并在2022年走高？</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Recently, Apple stock flirted with $3 trillion in market cap, but quickly dipped below $2.9 trillion — as the broad market reacted to monetary tightening that should now happen more rapidly than previously expected.</p><p><blockquote>最近，苹果股票的市值曾一度接近3万亿美元，但很快跌破2.9万亿美元——因为大盘对货币紧缩的反应现在应该比之前预期的更快。</blockquote></p><p>Can shares of the Cupertino company finally find its way north in 2022 and meet the expectations of so many bulls on Wall Street? Or will bearishness take over during a year of rising interest rates and lingering inflation?</p><p><blockquote>这家库比蒂诺公司的股价能否最终在2022年找到北上之路，并满足华尔街众多多头的预期？或者，在利率上升和通胀挥之不去的一年里，看跌情绪会占上风吗？</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f77cd919bf55f9c7b79f631b0255910\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"697\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 1: Apple Park in Cupertino, CA.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺的苹果公园。</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>AAPL: the bull case</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司：牛市案例</b></blockquote></p><p>As Apple stock climbed viciously between late November and early December, many Wall Street experts piled on in support of “AAPL $3T”. Wedbush’s Dan Ives, for example, has been talking about the market cap milestone since our conversation in Q3 of last year, at least.</p><p><blockquote>随着苹果股价在11月底至12月初期间恶性攀升，许多华尔街专家纷纷支持“AAPL$3T”。例如，至少自去年第三季度我们的谈话以来，Wedbush的Dan Ives一直在谈论市值里程碑。</blockquote></p><p>But other analysts have also hopped on the bullish bandwagon recently. Morgan Stanley upped its price target to $200 per share in November, while the JPMorgan research team saw Apple stock heading to $3.5 trillion in market cap over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>但其他分析师最近也加入了看涨行列。摩根士丹利在11月份将目标价上调至每股200美元，而摩根大通研究团队预计苹果股票的市值将在未来12个月内达到3.5万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>One of the most vocal optimists came from the buy side. Loup’s Gene Munster thought that his previous price target had quickly become stale, and that $250 per share now seemed more reasonable. In his opinion, the multi-year opportunity in the metaverse will gain investor appreciation in the new year, which should reignite momentum that the stock had lost in the last few weeks of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>最直言不讳的乐观主义者之一来自买方。Loup的吉恩·蒙斯特(Gene Munster)认为，他之前的目标价很快就过时了，现在每股250美元似乎更合理。他认为，元宇宙的多年机会将在新的一年里获得投资者的赞赏，这应该会重新点燃该股在2021年最后几周失去的动力。</blockquote></p><p><b>AAPL: the bear case</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司：熊市案例</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite the upbeat expectations described above, mostly supported by company-specific factors, the market rolled into 2022 with its guard up. The boogieman of the moment seems to be the Federal Reserve’s anticipated reaction to near-full employment and sticky inflation, which should lead to higher interest rates in the next several months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在上述乐观预期，主要受到公司特定因素的支持，但市场在进入2022年时仍保持警惕。眼下的恶魔似乎是美联储对接近充分就业和粘性通胀的预期反应，这应该会导致未来几个月利率上升。</blockquote></p><p>I have recently explained how tighter money supply can spell trouble for stocks that trade for relatively high multiples. While AAPL is no Tesla or Rivian, the stock’s forward P/E of nearly 30 times and only modest earnings growth expectations could be a drag for share price in 2022, as investors look for better deals in value and cyclical stocks.</p><p><blockquote>我最近解释了货币供应收紧如何给市盈率相对较高的股票带来麻烦。虽然AAPL不是特斯拉或Rivian，但该股近30倍的预期市盈率和仅温和的盈利增长预期可能会拖累2022年的股价，因为投资者正在寻找价值股和周期性股票的更好交易。</blockquote></p><p><b>The Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果专家的看法</b></blockquote></p><p>I continue to think that Apple is a great stock to buy and hold for the long term. Under the leadership of a CEO (and former COO) that is driven by operational excellence, the company seems to be in very good hands. Better yet, demand for Apple’s products and services, as well as consumer appreciation for the brand, seem to be at or near an all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>我仍然认为苹果是一只值得长期购买和持有的优秀股票。在以卓越运营为驱动力的首席执行官（和前首席运营官）的领导下，该公司似乎得到了很好的管理。更好的是，对苹果产品和服务的需求以及消费者对该品牌的赞赏似乎处于或接近历史最高水平。</blockquote></p><p>That said, the setup for the first few weeks or months of 2022 looks challenging to me. Apple stock climbed relentlessly in 2020, and then again last year. Aided by a spike in pandemic-driven demand for tech devices and lavish liquidity in the system, AAPL recorded one of its best three years of returns ever between 2019 and 2021.</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，2022年前几周或几个月的设置对我来说看起来很有挑战性。苹果股价在2020年无情攀升，去年再次攀升。得益于大流行推动的科技设备需求激增以及系统中充裕的流动性，AAPL在2019年至2021年间创下了有史以来最好的三年回报率之一。</blockquote></p><p>As much as the metaverse and autonomous vehicles can and likely will support the company’s financial results over the next many years, I think that AAPL stock is overdue for a breather. While shares will likely climb back above $3 trillion and head much higher from there eventually, I am not so confident that this rally will happen in the immediate future.</p><p><blockquote>尽管元宇宙和自动驾驶汽车能够而且很可能支持公司未来许多年的财务业绩，但我认为苹果公司的股票早就应该喘口气了。虽然股价可能会回升至3万亿美元以上，并最终进一步走高，但我对这种反弹会在不久的将来发生不太有信心。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Apple Stock Reclaim $3 Trillion And Thrive In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价能否在2022年收回3万亿美元并蓬勃发展？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Apple Stock Reclaim $3 Trillion And Thrive In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价能否在2022年收回3万亿美元并蓬勃发展？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-01-09 12:31</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>A market cap of $3 trillion has, so far, proven to be a ceiling that Apple stock does not seem ready to break through yet. Can shares reclaim the milestone soon and head higher in 2022?</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>到目前为止，3万亿美元的市值已被证明是苹果股票似乎尚未准备好突破的上限。股价能否很快恢复里程碑并在2022年走高？</body></html></blockquote></p><p>Recently, Apple stock flirted with $3 trillion in market cap, but quickly dipped below $2.9 trillion — as the broad market reacted to monetary tightening that should now happen more rapidly than previously expected.</p><p><blockquote>最近，苹果股票的市值曾一度接近3万亿美元，但很快跌破2.9万亿美元——因为大盘对货币紧缩的反应现在应该比之前预期的更快。</blockquote></p><p>Can shares of the Cupertino company finally find its way north in 2022 and meet the expectations of so many bulls on Wall Street? Or will bearishness take over during a year of rising interest rates and lingering inflation?</p><p><blockquote>这家库比蒂诺公司的股价能否最终在2022年找到北上之路，并满足华尔街众多多头的预期？或者，在利率上升和通胀挥之不去的一年里，看跌情绪会占上风吗？</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f77cd919bf55f9c7b79f631b0255910\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"697\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 1: Apple Park in Cupertino, CA.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺的苹果公园。</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>AAPL: the bull case</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司：牛市案例</b></blockquote></p><p>As Apple stock climbed viciously between late November and early December, many Wall Street experts piled on in support of “AAPL $3T”. Wedbush’s Dan Ives, for example, has been talking about the market cap milestone since our conversation in Q3 of last year, at least.</p><p><blockquote>随着苹果股价在11月底至12月初期间恶性攀升，许多华尔街专家纷纷支持“AAPL$3T”。例如，至少自去年第三季度我们的谈话以来，Wedbush的Dan Ives一直在谈论市值里程碑。</blockquote></p><p>But other analysts have also hopped on the bullish bandwagon recently. Morgan Stanley upped its price target to $200 per share in November, while the JPMorgan research team saw Apple stock heading to $3.5 trillion in market cap over the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>但其他分析师最近也加入了看涨行列。摩根士丹利在11月份将目标价上调至每股200美元，而摩根大通研究团队预计苹果股票的市值将在未来12个月内达到3.5万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p>One of the most vocal optimists came from the buy side. Loup’s Gene Munster thought that his previous price target had quickly become stale, and that $250 per share now seemed more reasonable. In his opinion, the multi-year opportunity in the metaverse will gain investor appreciation in the new year, which should reignite momentum that the stock had lost in the last few weeks of 2021.</p><p><blockquote>最直言不讳的乐观主义者之一来自买方。Loup的吉恩·蒙斯特(Gene Munster)认为，他之前的目标价很快就过时了，现在每股250美元似乎更合理。他认为，元宇宙的多年机会将在新的一年里获得投资者的赞赏，这应该会重新点燃该股在2021年最后几周失去的动力。</blockquote></p><p><b>AAPL: the bear case</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司：熊市案例</b></blockquote></p><p>Despite the upbeat expectations described above, mostly supported by company-specific factors, the market rolled into 2022 with its guard up. The boogieman of the moment seems to be the Federal Reserve’s anticipated reaction to near-full employment and sticky inflation, which should lead to higher interest rates in the next several months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在上述乐观预期，主要受到公司特定因素的支持，但市场在进入2022年时仍保持警惕。眼下的恶魔似乎是美联储对接近充分就业和粘性通胀的预期反应，这应该会导致未来几个月利率上升。</blockquote></p><p>I have recently explained how tighter money supply can spell trouble for stocks that trade for relatively high multiples. While AAPL is no Tesla or Rivian, the stock’s forward P/E of nearly 30 times and only modest earnings growth expectations could be a drag for share price in 2022, as investors look for better deals in value and cyclical stocks.</p><p><blockquote>我最近解释了货币供应收紧如何给市盈率相对较高的股票带来麻烦。虽然AAPL不是特斯拉或Rivian，但该股近30倍的预期市盈率和仅温和的盈利增长预期可能会拖累2022年的股价，因为投资者正在寻找价值股和周期性股票的更好交易。</blockquote></p><p><b>The Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果专家的看法</b></blockquote></p><p>I continue to think that Apple is a great stock to buy and hold for the long term. Under the leadership of a CEO (and former COO) that is driven by operational excellence, the company seems to be in very good hands. Better yet, demand for Apple’s products and services, as well as consumer appreciation for the brand, seem to be at or near an all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>我仍然认为苹果是一只值得长期购买和持有的优秀股票。在以卓越运营为驱动力的首席执行官（和前首席运营官）的领导下，该公司似乎得到了很好的管理。更好的是，对苹果产品和服务的需求以及消费者对该品牌的赞赏似乎处于或接近历史最高水平。</blockquote></p><p>That said, the setup for the first few weeks or months of 2022 looks challenging to me. Apple stock climbed relentlessly in 2020, and then again last year. Aided by a spike in pandemic-driven demand for tech devices and lavish liquidity in the system, AAPL recorded one of its best three years of returns ever between 2019 and 2021.</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，2022年前几周或几个月的设置对我来说看起来很有挑战性。苹果股价在2020年无情攀升，去年再次攀升。得益于大流行推动的科技设备需求激增以及系统中充裕的流动性，AAPL在2019年至2021年间创下了有史以来最好的三年回报率之一。</blockquote></p><p>As much as the metaverse and autonomous vehicles can and likely will support the company’s financial results over the next many years, I think that AAPL stock is overdue for a breather. While shares will likely climb back above $3 trillion and head much higher from there eventually, I am not so confident that this rally will happen in the immediate future.</p><p><blockquote>尽管元宇宙和自动驾驶汽车能够而且很可能支持公司未来许多年的财务业绩，但我认为苹果公司的股票早就应该喘口气了。虽然股价可能会回升至3万亿美元以上，并最终进一步走高，但我对这种反弹会在不久的将来发生不太有信心。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/can-apple-stock-reclaim-3-trillion-and-thrive-in-2022\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/can-apple-stock-reclaim-3-trillion-and-thrive-in-2022","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198290127","content_text":"A market cap of $3 trillion has, so far, proven to be a ceiling that Apple stock does not seem ready to break through yet. Can shares reclaim the milestone soon and head higher in 2022?Recently, Apple stock flirted with $3 trillion in market cap, but quickly dipped below $2.9 trillion — as the broad market reacted to monetary tightening that should now happen more rapidly than previously expected.Can shares of the Cupertino company finally find its way north in 2022 and meet the expectations of so many bulls on Wall Street? Or will bearishness take over during a year of rising interest rates and lingering inflation?Figure 1: Apple Park in Cupertino, CA.AAPL: the bull caseAs Apple stock climbed viciously between late November and early December, many Wall Street experts piled on in support of “AAPL $3T”. Wedbush’s Dan Ives, for example, has been talking about the market cap milestone since our conversation in Q3 of last year, at least.But other analysts have also hopped on the bullish bandwagon recently. Morgan Stanley upped its price target to $200 per share in November, while the JPMorgan research team saw Apple stock heading to $3.5 trillion in market cap over the next 12 months.One of the most vocal optimists came from the buy side. Loup’s Gene Munster thought that his previous price target had quickly become stale, and that $250 per share now seemed more reasonable. In his opinion, the multi-year opportunity in the metaverse will gain investor appreciation in the new year, which should reignite momentum that the stock had lost in the last few weeks of 2021.AAPL: the bear caseDespite the upbeat expectations described above, mostly supported by company-specific factors, the market rolled into 2022 with its guard up. The boogieman of the moment seems to be the Federal Reserve’s anticipated reaction to near-full employment and sticky inflation, which should lead to higher interest rates in the next several months.I have recently explained how tighter money supply can spell trouble for stocks that trade for relatively high multiples. While AAPL is no Tesla or Rivian, the stock’s forward P/E of nearly 30 times and only modest earnings growth expectations could be a drag for share price in 2022, as investors look for better deals in value and cyclical stocks.The Apple Maven’s takeI continue to think that Apple is a great stock to buy and hold for the long term. Under the leadership of a CEO (and former COO) that is driven by operational excellence, the company seems to be in very good hands. Better yet, demand for Apple’s products and services, as well as consumer appreciation for the brand, seem to be at or near an all-time high.That said, the setup for the first few weeks or months of 2022 looks challenging to me. Apple stock climbed relentlessly in 2020, and then again last year. Aided by a spike in pandemic-driven demand for tech devices and lavish liquidity in the system, AAPL recorded one of its best three years of returns ever between 2019 and 2021.As much as the metaverse and autonomous vehicles can and likely will support the company’s financial results over the next many years, I think that AAPL stock is overdue for a breather. While shares will likely climb back above $3 trillion and head much higher from there eventually, I am not so confident that this rally will happen in the immediate future.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2254,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":695761776,"gmtCreate":1641603585248,"gmtModify":1641603586538,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/695761776","repostId":"2201219990","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2896,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":695511134,"gmtCreate":1641518312707,"gmtModify":1641518313021,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/695511134","repostId":"1122553653","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":695824960,"gmtCreate":1641422133887,"gmtModify":1641422134243,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"follow","listText":"follow","text":"follow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/695824960","repostId":"2201236894","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2670,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":695387653,"gmtCreate":1641343554771,"gmtModify":1641343555051,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/695387653","repostId":"2201418283","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3015,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":695055789,"gmtCreate":1641277902335,"gmtModify":1641277902696,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"sure&nbsp;","listText":"sure&nbsp;","text":"sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/695055789","repostId":"1179133564","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179133564","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1641266758,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1179133564?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-01-04 11:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock Likely To Reach $200 In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价有可能在2022年达到200美元吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179133564","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryApple stock received a lot of interest recently as it surged in early December and has mainta","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Apple stock received a lot of interest recently as it surged in early December and has maintained its market outperformance.</li><li>We discuss the critical drivers for investors to watch moving into 2022.</li><li>We also discuss whether Apple stock is likely to reach $200 moving forward.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e9d29c6db997dd98e087415e7e2acfe\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1036\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Justin Sullivan/Getty Images News</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果股票最近受到了很多关注，因为它在12月初飙升，并保持了优于市场的表现。</li><li>我们讨论了投资者进入2022年需要关注的关键驱动因素。</li><li>我们还讨论了苹果股价未来是否有可能达到200美元。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>贾斯汀·沙利文/盖蒂图片社新闻</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资论文</b></blockquote></p><p>Apple Inc. (AAPL) has recently drawn significant interest among investors as the stock has continued to outperform the market since early December. It&#39;s notable since AAPL stock has lagged the market for almost the whole year. However, investors&#39; interests spiked following the series of successful new product launches, including its pivotal iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>苹果公司（AAPL）最近引起了投资者的极大兴趣，因为该股自12月初以来持续跑赢大盘。这一点值得注意，因为苹果公司的股票几乎全年都落后于市场。然而，在一系列成功推出新产品（包括关键的iPhone 13）后，投资者的兴趣激增。</blockquote></p><p>Supply chain checks from numerous sell-side analysts have also demonstrated that the delays over its iPhones have improved markedly. In addition, Goldman Sachs also highlighted that lead times were down significantly in mid-December as Apple continues to leverage strong iPhone demand in its most crucial calendar quarter.</p><p><blockquote>众多卖方分析师的供应链检查也表明，其iPhone的延迟已显着改善。此外，高盛还强调，由于苹果在其最关键的日历季度继续利用强劲的iPhone需求，交货时间在12月中旬大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>AAPL stock continues to hold its price steadily, briefly topped a $3T market cap milestone. However, there shouldn&#39;t be any doubt that AAPL stock has had an unmistakable long-term uptrend over the years. Moreover, given that the company has multiple long-term secular drivers driving its business model, we are confident that the stock can reach $200 in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL股票继续保持价格稳定，市值一度突破3T美元的里程碑。然而，毫无疑问，苹果公司的股票多年来一直具有明显的长期上升趋势。此外，鉴于该公司有多个长期长期驱动因素推动其商业模式，我们有信心该股在2022年能够达到200美元。</blockquote></p><p>We discuss these critical drivers for AAPL stock as we head into 2022 with the $3T market cap looking over the horizon.</p><p><blockquote>随着3T美元市值即将进入2022年，我们将讨论AAPL股票的这些关键驱动因素。</blockquote></p><p><b>Services Revenue Growth Could Have Been Significantly Understated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>服务收入增长可能被大大低估</b></blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a837d0ef4f22be5610e00a0a6c3b6a5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple revenue and adjusted EBITDA mean consensus estimates. Data source: S&amp;P Capital IQ</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果收入和调整后EBITDA意味着共识预期。数据来源：标普资本智商</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Apple bears have often pointed out the deceleration in the company&#39;s topline growth as proof of a stock that is massively overvalued. It&#39;s easy to understand what they mean. Readers can refer to the chart above, where Apple&#39;s revenue growth is estimated to decelerate over the next three years. Consensus estimates point to a revenue CAGR of just 4.6% through FY24. Moreover, its adjusted EBITDA margins are likely to remain consistent. But, AAPL is not projected to gain leverage towards its profitability. Hence, bearish investors claim they don&#39;t understand how the Cupertino company can continue to justify its current valuation.</p><p><blockquote>看空苹果的人经常指出，该公司营收增长放缓证明该股被严重高估。很容易理解他们的意思。读者可以参考上图，苹果的收入增长预计将在未来三年内减速。普遍估计表明，到2024财年，收入复合年增长率仅为4.6%。此外，其调整后的EBITDA利润率可能会保持一致。但是，苹果公司预计不会获得盈利能力。因此，看跌的投资者声称他们不明白库比蒂诺公司如何继续证明其当前估值的合理性。</blockquote></p><p>But, we think investors need to step back and consider the critical growth drivers for AAPL moving forward. So let us present our analysis.</p><p><blockquote>但是，我们认为投资者需要退后一步，考虑苹果公司未来的关键增长动力。因此，让我们提出我们的分析。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3850a7b0d906064e94b474a4f50c3fd4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple iPhone and services revenue estimates. Data source: Trefis, author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果iPhone和服务收入估计。数据来源：Trefis，作者</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Readers can refer to the above model, where iPhone&#39;s revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of just 2.2% over the next five years. However, Apple&#39;s services segment (including App Store&#39;s revenue) is projected to increase its revenue at a CAGR of 11% through FY26, reaching $115B. We think these estimates are relatively conservative. Based on these estimates, a SOTP implied fair value of $159 was reached for AAPL stock. It also includes other segments but was mainly driven by the two critical segments above. iPhone and services accounted for 43% and 25% of its SOTP valuation.</p><p><blockquote>读者可以参考上述模型，iPhone的收入预计未来五年复合年增长率仅为2.2%。然而，苹果的服务部门（包括App Store的收入）预计到2026财年其收入将以11%的复合年增长率增长，达到$115B。我们认为这些估计相对保守。根据这些估计，AAPL股票的SOTP隐含公允价值为159美元。它还包括其他细分市场，但主要由上述两个关键细分市场驱动。iPhone和服务分别占其SOTP估值的43%和25%。</blockquote></p><p>But, we believe that these estimates may not have captured the multiple growth drivers underpinning the App Store. Why?</p><p><blockquote>但是，我们认为这些估计可能没有抓住支撑App Store的多种增长动力。为什么？</blockquote></p><p>Based on recent estimates by Sensor Tower, App Store&#39;s revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of 20.7% through CY25, reaching $185B. Notably, it&#39;s way ahead of the estimate of $115B that we discussed earlier for the entire services segment. Importantly, we have not even included revenue from the other services other than App Store&#39;s contribution. Therefore, we think that readers need to consider that the Street consensus may have significantly underestimated the prowess of Apple&#39;s highly profitable (estimated operating margin &gt; 70%) App Store.</p><p><blockquote>根据Sensor Tower最近的估计，App Store的收入预计到2025年将以20.7%的复合年增长率增长，达到1850亿美元。值得注意的是，这远远超出了我们之前讨论的整个服务领域115B美元的估计。重要的是，我们甚至没有包括除App Store贡献之外的其他服务的收入。因此，我们认为读者需要考虑到，街头共识可能大大低估了苹果高利润（估计营业利润率&gt;70%）应用商店的实力。</blockquote></p><p>We are not saying that Sensor Tower&#39;s estimate is the source of truth. But, we wanted to highlight that investors should pay more attention to Apple&#39;s key services segment. Sensor Tower presented a region by region breakdown, which we thought seemed credible, and we encourage investors to monitor closely.</p><p><blockquote>我们并不是说传感器塔的估计是事实的来源。但是，我们想强调的是，投资者应该更多地关注苹果的关键服务领域。Sensor Tower按地区进行了细分，我们认为这似乎可信，我们鼓励投资者密切关注。</blockquote></p><p><b>Don&#39;t Ignore Apple&#39;s Metaverse Ambitions</b></p><p><blockquote><b>不要忽视苹果的元宇宙野心</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Renowned TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo estimated that Apple&#39;s AR/VR device would be released sometime in Q4&#39;22. We believe this is significant as it augurs well for Apple&#39;s ambitions into the metaverse. There&#39;s little doubt that Meta Platforms (FB) and Microsoft(MSFT) are strengthening their lead in the consumer and commercial AR/VR space.According to TrendForce, global AR/VR device shipment is estimated to reach 12.02M units, up 26.4% YoY in 2022. Moreover, the market is estimated to grow rapidly through 2025, reaching 25.76M units at a CAGR of 38.8%. Notably, it expects Meta&#39;s Oculus devices to maintain a 66% consumer market share. But, TrendForce also noted that (edited):</p><p><blockquote>著名天风国际证券分析师郭明錤估计，苹果的AR/VR设备将于22年第四季度的某个时候发布。我们认为这意义重大，因为它预示着苹果进军虚拟宇宙的雄心。毫无疑问，Meta Platforms(FB)和微软(MSFT)正在巩固其在消费者和商业AR/VR领域的领先地位。根据TrendForce的数据，2022年全球AR/VR设备出货量预计将达到1202万台，同比增长26.4%。此外，预计到2025年，该市场将快速增长，达到2576万辆，CAGR为38.8%。值得注意的是，预计Meta的Oculus设备将保持66%的消费者市场份额。但是，TrendForce还指出（编辑）：</blockquote></p><p>AR/VR device suppliers may look to expand their user base and increase their market penetration via low-priced yet high-spec devices,<i>while compensating for their reduced hardware profitability through software sales</i>. (TrendForce)Software sales indeed. Apple runs the largest mobile ecosystem globally, which dwarfs Google Play&#39;s (GOOG) (GOOGL) revenue. Therefore, we believe the entry of Apple into the metaverse game could significantly raise the company&#39;s monetization opportunities. Theories that Meta Platform has ambitions to displace Apple as the next-gen computing platform abound. However, we have also discussed thatMeta Platforms&#39; eventual metaverse will unlikely be the only virtual world we will ever experience. Instead, the metaverse will likely be a series of interconnected virtual worlds that will be interoperable. So, Apple could still be the critical ecosystem owner as creators build their virtual worlds to be monetized through the App Store, reaching out to Apple&#39;s more than 1B (and growing) installed base.</p><p><blockquote>AR/VR设备供应商可能希望通过低价但高规格的设备扩大其用户群并提高其市场渗透率，<i>同时通过软件销售弥补硬件盈利能力的下降</i>.(TrendForce)确实是软件销售。苹果运营着全球最大的移动生态系统，这使得Google Play(GOOG)（GOOGL）的收入相形见绌。因此，我们认为苹果进入元宇宙游戏可能会显着提高该公司的货币化机会。关于Meta Platform有雄心取代苹果成为下一代计算平台的理论比比皆是。然而，我们也讨论过Meta Platforms最终的元宇宙不太可能是我们体验过的唯一虚拟世界。相反，元宇宙很可能是一系列可互操作的互联虚拟世界。因此，苹果仍然可能是关键的生态系统所有者，因为创作者构建他们的虚拟世界，通过App Store赚钱，接触到苹果超过1B（并且不断增长）的安装基础。</blockquote></p><p>TrendForce also added that global VR content revenue is estimated to grow at a rapid 40% CAGR through 2025, reaching $8.3B. The content will be varied but primarily consisting of &#34;gaming/entertainment, videos, and social interactions.&#34; Therefore, Apple can continue to leverage such opportunities through its massive ecosystem. We think these opportunities are so novel that it hasn&#39;t even been written into Apple&#39;s consensus estimates just yet. But, once Apple&#39;s AR/VR devices are launched, we believe that the revenue runway could become even more apparent. However, we must still caution that we are still very early into Apple&#39;s metaverse ambitions. But, we believe that Apple will be a critical player in defining the metaverse through its ecosystem. It won&#39;t be very smart to consider that Apple doesn&#39;t have a clearly-defined metaverse strategy.</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce还补充说，预计到2025年，全球VR内容收入将以40%的复合年增长率快速增长，达到83亿美元。内容多种多样，但主要由“游戏/娱乐、视频和社交互动”组成。因此，苹果可以通过其庞大的生态系统继续利用此类机会。我们认为这些机会非常新颖，甚至还没有被写入苹果的共识估计中。但是，一旦苹果的AR/VR设备推出，我们相信收入跑道可能会变得更加明显。然而，我们仍然必须警告，我们对苹果的元宇宙雄心还为时过早。但是，我们相信苹果将成为通过其生态系统定义虚拟宇宙的关键参与者。考虑到苹果没有明确定义的元宇宙战略，这并不是很明智。</blockquote></p><p><b>So, is AAPL Stock a Buy Now?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么，AAPL股票现在值得买入吗？</b></blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6087fafa5c6ee0f2958f8d29919c3eb5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL stock EV/NTM EBIT, and Normalized P/E (NTM) 3Y mean.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>AAPL股票EV/NTM息税前利润和标准化市盈率(NTM)3年平均值。</span></p></blockquote></p><p>If you consider AAPL stock&#39;s relative valuation against its 3Y mean, there&#39;s little doubt that AAPL stock seems expensive. It&#39;s trading at an EV/NTM EBIT of 26x, way above its 3Y mean of 19.3x. In addition, its normalized P/E (NTM) also read 31.2x, significantly ahead of its 3Y mean of 23.9x. Therefore, we wouldn&#39;t blame bearish investors who think that AAPL stock seems well overvalued now.</p><p><blockquote>如果你考虑AAPL股票与其3年平均值的相对估值，毫无疑问，AAPL股票似乎很昂贵。其EV/NTM息税前利润为26倍，远高于19.3倍的3年平均水平。此外，其标准化市盈率(NTM)也为31.2倍，明显高于23.9倍的3年平均值。因此，我们不会责怪那些认为苹果公司股票现在似乎被高估的看跌投资者。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2c889e6a8aa5fe9751c5d695481f9d3b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple unlevered FCF estimates. Data source: S&amp;P Capital IQ, author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果无杠杆自由现金流估计。数据来源：标普资本智商，作者</span></p></blockquote></p><p>However, we also estimated that AAPL stock would continue to generate robust FCF growth over time. Moreover, our model is even more conservative than the consensus estimates. In addition, we have also not considered Sensor Tower&#39;s estimates or Apple&#39;s metaverse opportunities that we discussed earlier. Nevertheless, it led us towards a DCF implied fair value estimate of $153, which we highlighted in our previous article. It&#39;s also quite close to our SOTP implied fair value of $159 that we showed earlier. Therefore, it&#39;s clear that these estimates have not factored for the robust services growth and the potential metaverse opportunities that could accrue to Apple over the next five to ten years.</p><p><blockquote>然而，我们还估计，随着时间的推移，AAPL股票将继续产生强劲的自由现金流增长。此外，我们的模型甚至比共识估计更加保守。此外，我们也没有考虑Sensor Tower的估计或我们之前讨论的苹果元宇宙机会。尽管如此，它使我们得出了153美元的DCF隐含公允价值估计，这是我们在上一篇文章中强调的。它也非常接近我们之前显示的SOTP隐含公允价值159美元。因此，很明显，这些估计没有考虑到苹果在未来五到十年内可能带来的强劲服务增长和潜在的元宇宙机会。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de1380b774a68d31c93eaf939fb99e27\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"347\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL stock price action.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果公司股价走势。</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Nevertheless, we think that AAPL stock looks extended, as seen above. But, as mentioned, it wouldn&#39;t be very smart for investors to bet against CEO Tim Cook &amp; Co. The stock&#39;s long-term uptrend is clear for all to observe.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，我们认为苹果公司的股票看起来会上涨，如上所示。但是，如前所述，投资者做空首席执行官蒂姆·库克公司并不是很明智。该股的长期上升趋势有目共睹。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>So, we are clear that the stock would likely break the $200 level in 2022 as the excitement surrounding its AR/VR launch gets closers, coupled with its services segment revenue growth in its earnings releases. As a result, we believe that AAPL&#39;s stock price could be re-rated to reflect its potential over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们很清楚，随着围绕其AR/VR发布的兴奋越来越近，再加上其财报中服务部门收入的增长，该股可能会在2022年突破200美元的水平。因此，我们认为苹果公司的股价可能会重新评级，以反映其明年的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>Nevertheless, due to its over-extended price action, we encourage some patience with AAPL stock. But, if you have no AAPL stock, we think you can consider adding at this price if you are a long-term investor. We don&#39;t believe it&#39;s significantly overvalued, as discussed earlier. But, if you already have considerable exposure relative to your portfolio, we think you can wait for a potentially better entry point with some patience.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，由于其过度的价格走势，我们鼓励对AAPL股票保持一定的耐心。但是，如果您没有AAPL股票，我们认为如果您是长期投资者，您可以考虑以这个价格买入。正如前面讨论的，我们不认为它被严重高估。但是，如果您相对于您的投资组合已经拥有相当大的敞口，我们认为您可以耐心等待潜在的更好的切入点。</blockquote></p><p>Therefore, we reiterate our Neutral rating on AAPL stock for now.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们暂时重申对AAPL股票的中性评级。</blockquote></p><p>This article was written by JR Research.</p><p><blockquote>本文由JR Research撰写。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock Likely To Reach $200 In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价有可能在2022年达到200美元吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock Likely To Reach $200 In 2022?<blockquote>苹果股价有可能在2022年达到200美元吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-01-04 11:25</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body><b>总结</b></body></html></blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Apple stock received a lot of interest recently as it surged in early December and has maintained its market outperformance.</li><li>We discuss the critical drivers for investors to watch moving into 2022.</li><li>We also discuss whether Apple stock is likely to reach $200 moving forward.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e9d29c6db997dd98e087415e7e2acfe\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1036\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Justin Sullivan/Getty Images News</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>苹果股票最近受到了很多关注，因为它在12月初飙升，并保持了优于市场的表现。</li><li>我们讨论了投资者进入2022年需要关注的关键驱动因素。</li><li>我们还讨论了苹果股价未来是否有可能达到200美元。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>贾斯汀·沙利文/盖蒂图片社新闻</span></p></blockquote></p><p><b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>投资论文</b></blockquote></p><p>Apple Inc. (AAPL) has recently drawn significant interest among investors as the stock has continued to outperform the market since early December. It&#39;s notable since AAPL stock has lagged the market for almost the whole year. However, investors&#39; interests spiked following the series of successful new product launches, including its pivotal iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>苹果公司（AAPL）最近引起了投资者的极大兴趣，因为该股自12月初以来持续跑赢大盘。这一点值得注意，因为苹果公司的股票几乎全年都落后于市场。然而，在一系列成功推出新产品（包括关键的iPhone 13）后，投资者的兴趣激增。</blockquote></p><p>Supply chain checks from numerous sell-side analysts have also demonstrated that the delays over its iPhones have improved markedly. In addition, Goldman Sachs also highlighted that lead times were down significantly in mid-December as Apple continues to leverage strong iPhone demand in its most crucial calendar quarter.</p><p><blockquote>众多卖方分析师的供应链检查也表明，其iPhone的延迟已显着改善。此外，高盛还强调，由于苹果在其最关键的日历季度继续利用强劲的iPhone需求，交货时间在12月中旬大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p>AAPL stock continues to hold its price steadily, briefly topped a $3T market cap milestone. However, there shouldn&#39;t be any doubt that AAPL stock has had an unmistakable long-term uptrend over the years. Moreover, given that the company has multiple long-term secular drivers driving its business model, we are confident that the stock can reach $200 in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>AAPL股票继续保持价格稳定，市值一度突破3T美元的里程碑。然而，毫无疑问，苹果公司的股票多年来一直具有明显的长期上升趋势。此外，鉴于该公司有多个长期长期驱动因素推动其商业模式，我们有信心该股在2022年能够达到200美元。</blockquote></p><p>We discuss these critical drivers for AAPL stock as we head into 2022 with the $3T market cap looking over the horizon.</p><p><blockquote>随着3T美元市值即将进入2022年，我们将讨论AAPL股票的这些关键驱动因素。</blockquote></p><p><b>Services Revenue Growth Could Have Been Significantly Understated</b></p><p><blockquote><b>服务收入增长可能被大大低估</b></blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a837d0ef4f22be5610e00a0a6c3b6a5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple revenue and adjusted EBITDA mean consensus estimates. Data source: S&amp;P Capital IQ</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果收入和调整后EBITDA意味着共识预期。数据来源：标普资本智商</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Apple bears have often pointed out the deceleration in the company&#39;s topline growth as proof of a stock that is massively overvalued. It&#39;s easy to understand what they mean. Readers can refer to the chart above, where Apple&#39;s revenue growth is estimated to decelerate over the next three years. Consensus estimates point to a revenue CAGR of just 4.6% through FY24. Moreover, its adjusted EBITDA margins are likely to remain consistent. But, AAPL is not projected to gain leverage towards its profitability. Hence, bearish investors claim they don&#39;t understand how the Cupertino company can continue to justify its current valuation.</p><p><blockquote>看空苹果的人经常指出，该公司营收增长放缓证明该股被严重高估。很容易理解他们的意思。读者可以参考上图，苹果的收入增长预计将在未来三年内减速。普遍估计表明，到2024财年，收入复合年增长率仅为4.6%。此外，其调整后的EBITDA利润率可能会保持一致。但是，苹果公司预计不会获得盈利能力。因此，看跌的投资者声称他们不明白库比蒂诺公司如何继续证明其当前估值的合理性。</blockquote></p><p>But, we think investors need to step back and consider the critical growth drivers for AAPL moving forward. So let us present our analysis.</p><p><blockquote>但是，我们认为投资者需要退后一步，考虑苹果公司未来的关键增长动力。因此，让我们提出我们的分析。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3850a7b0d906064e94b474a4f50c3fd4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple iPhone and services revenue estimates. Data source: Trefis, author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果iPhone和服务收入估计。数据来源：Trefis，作者</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Readers can refer to the above model, where iPhone&#39;s revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of just 2.2% over the next five years. However, Apple&#39;s services segment (including App Store&#39;s revenue) is projected to increase its revenue at a CAGR of 11% through FY26, reaching $115B. We think these estimates are relatively conservative. Based on these estimates, a SOTP implied fair value of $159 was reached for AAPL stock. It also includes other segments but was mainly driven by the two critical segments above. iPhone and services accounted for 43% and 25% of its SOTP valuation.</p><p><blockquote>读者可以参考上述模型，iPhone的收入预计未来五年复合年增长率仅为2.2%。然而，苹果的服务部门（包括App Store的收入）预计到2026财年其收入将以11%的复合年增长率增长，达到$115B。我们认为这些估计相对保守。根据这些估计，AAPL股票的SOTP隐含公允价值为159美元。它还包括其他细分市场，但主要由上述两个关键细分市场驱动。iPhone和服务分别占其SOTP估值的43%和25%。</blockquote></p><p>But, we believe that these estimates may not have captured the multiple growth drivers underpinning the App Store. Why?</p><p><blockquote>但是，我们认为这些估计可能没有抓住支撑App Store的多种增长动力。为什么？</blockquote></p><p>Based on recent estimates by Sensor Tower, App Store&#39;s revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of 20.7% through CY25, reaching $185B. Notably, it&#39;s way ahead of the estimate of $115B that we discussed earlier for the entire services segment. Importantly, we have not even included revenue from the other services other than App Store&#39;s contribution. Therefore, we think that readers need to consider that the Street consensus may have significantly underestimated the prowess of Apple&#39;s highly profitable (estimated operating margin &gt; 70%) App Store.</p><p><blockquote>根据Sensor Tower最近的估计，App Store的收入预计到2025年将以20.7%的复合年增长率增长，达到1850亿美元。值得注意的是，这远远超出了我们之前讨论的整个服务领域115B美元的估计。重要的是，我们甚至没有包括除App Store贡献之外的其他服务的收入。因此，我们认为读者需要考虑到，街头共识可能大大低估了苹果高利润（估计营业利润率&gt;70%）应用商店的实力。</blockquote></p><p>We are not saying that Sensor Tower&#39;s estimate is the source of truth. But, we wanted to highlight that investors should pay more attention to Apple&#39;s key services segment. Sensor Tower presented a region by region breakdown, which we thought seemed credible, and we encourage investors to monitor closely.</p><p><blockquote>我们并不是说传感器塔的估计是事实的来源。但是，我们想强调的是，投资者应该更多地关注苹果的关键服务领域。Sensor Tower按地区进行了细分，我们认为这似乎可信，我们鼓励投资者密切关注。</blockquote></p><p><b>Don&#39;t Ignore Apple&#39;s Metaverse Ambitions</b></p><p><blockquote><b>不要忽视苹果的元宇宙野心</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p>Renowned TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo estimated that Apple&#39;s AR/VR device would be released sometime in Q4&#39;22. We believe this is significant as it augurs well for Apple&#39;s ambitions into the metaverse. There&#39;s little doubt that Meta Platforms (FB) and Microsoft(MSFT) are strengthening their lead in the consumer and commercial AR/VR space.According to TrendForce, global AR/VR device shipment is estimated to reach 12.02M units, up 26.4% YoY in 2022. Moreover, the market is estimated to grow rapidly through 2025, reaching 25.76M units at a CAGR of 38.8%. Notably, it expects Meta&#39;s Oculus devices to maintain a 66% consumer market share. But, TrendForce also noted that (edited):</p><p><blockquote>著名天风国际证券分析师郭明錤估计，苹果的AR/VR设备将于22年第四季度的某个时候发布。我们认为这意义重大，因为它预示着苹果进军虚拟宇宙的雄心。毫无疑问，Meta Platforms(FB)和微软(MSFT)正在巩固其在消费者和商业AR/VR领域的领先地位。根据TrendForce的数据，2022年全球AR/VR设备出货量预计将达到1202万台，同比增长26.4%。此外，预计到2025年，该市场将快速增长，达到2576万辆，CAGR为38.8%。值得注意的是，预计Meta的Oculus设备将保持66%的消费者市场份额。但是，TrendForce还指出（编辑）：</blockquote></p><p>AR/VR device suppliers may look to expand their user base and increase their market penetration via low-priced yet high-spec devices,<i>while compensating for their reduced hardware profitability through software sales</i>. (TrendForce)Software sales indeed. Apple runs the largest mobile ecosystem globally, which dwarfs Google Play&#39;s (GOOG) (GOOGL) revenue. Therefore, we believe the entry of Apple into the metaverse game could significantly raise the company&#39;s monetization opportunities. Theories that Meta Platform has ambitions to displace Apple as the next-gen computing platform abound. However, we have also discussed thatMeta Platforms&#39; eventual metaverse will unlikely be the only virtual world we will ever experience. Instead, the metaverse will likely be a series of interconnected virtual worlds that will be interoperable. So, Apple could still be the critical ecosystem owner as creators build their virtual worlds to be monetized through the App Store, reaching out to Apple&#39;s more than 1B (and growing) installed base.</p><p><blockquote>AR/VR设备供应商可能希望通过低价但高规格的设备扩大其用户群并提高其市场渗透率，<i>同时通过软件销售弥补硬件盈利能力的下降</i>.(TrendForce)确实是软件销售。苹果运营着全球最大的移动生态系统，这使得Google Play(GOOG)（GOOGL）的收入相形见绌。因此，我们认为苹果进入元宇宙游戏可能会显着提高该公司的货币化机会。关于Meta Platform有雄心取代苹果成为下一代计算平台的理论比比皆是。然而，我们也讨论过Meta Platforms最终的元宇宙不太可能是我们体验过的唯一虚拟世界。相反，元宇宙很可能是一系列可互操作的互联虚拟世界。因此，苹果仍然可能是关键的生态系统所有者，因为创作者构建他们的虚拟世界，通过App Store赚钱，接触到苹果超过1B（并且不断增长）的安装基础。</blockquote></p><p>TrendForce also added that global VR content revenue is estimated to grow at a rapid 40% CAGR through 2025, reaching $8.3B. The content will be varied but primarily consisting of &#34;gaming/entertainment, videos, and social interactions.&#34; Therefore, Apple can continue to leverage such opportunities through its massive ecosystem. We think these opportunities are so novel that it hasn&#39;t even been written into Apple&#39;s consensus estimates just yet. But, once Apple&#39;s AR/VR devices are launched, we believe that the revenue runway could become even more apparent. However, we must still caution that we are still very early into Apple&#39;s metaverse ambitions. But, we believe that Apple will be a critical player in defining the metaverse through its ecosystem. It won&#39;t be very smart to consider that Apple doesn&#39;t have a clearly-defined metaverse strategy.</p><p><blockquote>TrendForce还补充说，预计到2025年，全球VR内容收入将以40%的复合年增长率快速增长，达到83亿美元。内容多种多样，但主要由“游戏/娱乐、视频和社交互动”组成。因此，苹果可以通过其庞大的生态系统继续利用此类机会。我们认为这些机会非常新颖，甚至还没有被写入苹果的共识估计中。但是，一旦苹果的AR/VR设备推出，我们相信收入跑道可能会变得更加明显。然而，我们仍然必须警告，我们对苹果的元宇宙雄心还为时过早。但是，我们相信苹果将成为通过其生态系统定义虚拟宇宙的关键参与者。考虑到苹果没有明确定义的元宇宙战略，这并不是很明智。</blockquote></p><p><b>So, is AAPL Stock a Buy Now?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那么，AAPL股票现在值得买入吗？</b></blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6087fafa5c6ee0f2958f8d29919c3eb5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL stock EV/NTM EBIT, and Normalized P/E (NTM) 3Y mean.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>AAPL股票EV/NTM息税前利润和标准化市盈率(NTM)3年平均值。</span></p></blockquote></p><p>If you consider AAPL stock&#39;s relative valuation against its 3Y mean, there&#39;s little doubt that AAPL stock seems expensive. It&#39;s trading at an EV/NTM EBIT of 26x, way above its 3Y mean of 19.3x. In addition, its normalized P/E (NTM) also read 31.2x, significantly ahead of its 3Y mean of 23.9x. Therefore, we wouldn&#39;t blame bearish investors who think that AAPL stock seems well overvalued now.</p><p><blockquote>如果你考虑AAPL股票与其3年平均值的相对估值，毫无疑问，AAPL股票似乎很昂贵。其EV/NTM息税前利润为26倍，远高于19.3倍的3年平均水平。此外，其标准化市盈率(NTM)也为31.2倍，明显高于23.9倍的3年平均值。因此，我们不会责怪那些认为苹果公司股票现在似乎被高估的看跌投资者。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2c889e6a8aa5fe9751c5d695481f9d3b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple unlevered FCF estimates. Data source: S&amp;P Capital IQ, author</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果无杠杆自由现金流估计。数据来源：标普资本智商，作者</span></p></blockquote></p><p>However, we also estimated that AAPL stock would continue to generate robust FCF growth over time. Moreover, our model is even more conservative than the consensus estimates. In addition, we have also not considered Sensor Tower&#39;s estimates or Apple&#39;s metaverse opportunities that we discussed earlier. Nevertheless, it led us towards a DCF implied fair value estimate of $153, which we highlighted in our previous article. It&#39;s also quite close to our SOTP implied fair value of $159 that we showed earlier. Therefore, it&#39;s clear that these estimates have not factored for the robust services growth and the potential metaverse opportunities that could accrue to Apple over the next five to ten years.</p><p><blockquote>然而，我们还估计，随着时间的推移，AAPL股票将继续产生强劲的自由现金流增长。此外，我们的模型甚至比共识估计更加保守。此外，我们也没有考虑Sensor Tower的估计或我们之前讨论的苹果元宇宙机会。尽管如此，它使我们得出了153美元的DCF隐含公允价值估计，这是我们在上一篇文章中强调的。它也非常接近我们之前显示的SOTP隐含公允价值159美元。因此，很明显，这些估计没有考虑到苹果在未来五到十年内可能带来的强劲服务增长和潜在的元宇宙机会。</blockquote></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de1380b774a68d31c93eaf939fb99e27\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"347\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL stock price action.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果公司股价走势。</span></p></blockquote></p><p>Nevertheless, we think that AAPL stock looks extended, as seen above. But, as mentioned, it wouldn&#39;t be very smart for investors to bet against CEO Tim Cook &amp; Co. The stock&#39;s long-term uptrend is clear for all to observe.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，我们认为苹果公司的股票看起来会上涨，如上所示。但是，如前所述，投资者做空首席执行官蒂姆·库克公司并不是很明智。该股的长期上升趋势有目共睹。</blockquote></p><p></p><p>So, we are clear that the stock would likely break the $200 level in 2022 as the excitement surrounding its AR/VR launch gets closers, coupled with its services segment revenue growth in its earnings releases. As a result, we believe that AAPL&#39;s stock price could be re-rated to reflect its potential over the next year.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们很清楚，随着围绕其AR/VR发布的兴奋越来越近，再加上其财报中服务部门收入的增长，该股可能会在2022年突破200美元的水平。因此，我们认为苹果公司的股价可能会重新评级，以反映其明年的潜力。</blockquote></p><p>Nevertheless, due to its over-extended price action, we encourage some patience with AAPL stock. But, if you have no AAPL stock, we think you can consider adding at this price if you are a long-term investor. We don&#39;t believe it&#39;s significantly overvalued, as discussed earlier. But, if you already have considerable exposure relative to your portfolio, we think you can wait for a potentially better entry point with some patience.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，由于其过度的价格走势，我们鼓励对AAPL股票保持一定的耐心。但是，如果您没有AAPL股票，我们认为如果您是长期投资者，您可以考虑以这个价格买入。正如前面讨论的，我们不认为它被严重高估。但是，如果您相对于您的投资组合已经拥有相当大的敞口，我们认为您可以耐心等待潜在的更好的切入点。</blockquote></p><p>Therefore, we reiterate our Neutral rating on AAPL stock for now.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们暂时重申对AAPL股票的中性评级。</blockquote></p><p>This article was written by JR Research.</p><p><blockquote>本文由JR Research撰写。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477741-apple-stock-reach-200-in-2022\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477741-apple-stock-reach-200-in-2022","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179133564","content_text":"SummaryApple stock received a lot of interest recently as it surged in early December and has maintained its market outperformance.We discuss the critical drivers for investors to watch moving into 2022.We also discuss whether Apple stock is likely to reach $200 moving forward.Justin Sullivan/Getty Images NewsInvestment ThesisApple Inc. (AAPL) has recently drawn significant interest among investors as the stock has continued to outperform the market since early December. It's notable since AAPL stock has lagged the market for almost the whole year. However, investors' interests spiked following the series of successful new product launches, including its pivotal iPhone 13.Supply chain checks from numerous sell-side analysts have also demonstrated that the delays over its iPhones have improved markedly. In addition, Goldman Sachs also highlighted that lead times were down significantly in mid-December as Apple continues to leverage strong iPhone demand in its most crucial calendar quarter.AAPL stock continues to hold its price steadily, briefly topped a $3T market cap milestone. However, there shouldn't be any doubt that AAPL stock has had an unmistakable long-term uptrend over the years. Moreover, given that the company has multiple long-term secular drivers driving its business model, we are confident that the stock can reach $200 in 2022.We discuss these critical drivers for AAPL stock as we head into 2022 with the $3T market cap looking over the horizon.Services Revenue Growth Could Have Been Significantly UnderstatedApple revenue and adjusted EBITDA mean consensus estimates. Data source: S&P Capital IQApple bears have often pointed out the deceleration in the company's topline growth as proof of a stock that is massively overvalued. It's easy to understand what they mean. Readers can refer to the chart above, where Apple's revenue growth is estimated to decelerate over the next three years. Consensus estimates point to a revenue CAGR of just 4.6% through FY24. Moreover, its adjusted EBITDA margins are likely to remain consistent. But, AAPL is not projected to gain leverage towards its profitability. Hence, bearish investors claim they don't understand how the Cupertino company can continue to justify its current valuation.But, we think investors need to step back and consider the critical growth drivers for AAPL moving forward. So let us present our analysis.Apple iPhone and services revenue estimates. Data source: Trefis, authorReaders can refer to the above model, where iPhone's revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of just 2.2% over the next five years. However, Apple's services segment (including App Store's revenue) is projected to increase its revenue at a CAGR of 11% through FY26, reaching $115B. We think these estimates are relatively conservative. Based on these estimates, a SOTP implied fair value of $159 was reached for AAPL stock. It also includes other segments but was mainly driven by the two critical segments above. iPhone and services accounted for 43% and 25% of its SOTP valuation.But, we believe that these estimates may not have captured the multiple growth drivers underpinning the App Store. Why?Based on recent estimates by Sensor Tower, App Store's revenue is estimated to increase at a CAGR of 20.7% through CY25, reaching $185B. Notably, it's way ahead of the estimate of $115B that we discussed earlier for the entire services segment. Importantly, we have not even included revenue from the other services other than App Store's contribution. Therefore, we think that readers need to consider that the Street consensus may have significantly underestimated the prowess of Apple's highly profitable (estimated operating margin > 70%) App Store.We are not saying that Sensor Tower's estimate is the source of truth. But, we wanted to highlight that investors should pay more attention to Apple's key services segment. Sensor Tower presented a region by region breakdown, which we thought seemed credible, and we encourage investors to monitor closely.Don't Ignore Apple's Metaverse AmbitionsRenowned TF International Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo estimated that Apple's AR/VR device would be released sometime in Q4'22. We believe this is significant as it augurs well for Apple's ambitions into the metaverse. There's little doubt that Meta Platforms (FB) and Microsoft(MSFT) are strengthening their lead in the consumer and commercial AR/VR space.According to TrendForce, global AR/VR device shipment is estimated to reach 12.02M units, up 26.4% YoY in 2022. Moreover, the market is estimated to grow rapidly through 2025, reaching 25.76M units at a CAGR of 38.8%. Notably, it expects Meta's Oculus devices to maintain a 66% consumer market share. But, TrendForce also noted that (edited):AR/VR device suppliers may look to expand their user base and increase their market penetration via low-priced yet high-spec devices,while compensating for their reduced hardware profitability through software sales. (TrendForce)Software sales indeed. Apple runs the largest mobile ecosystem globally, which dwarfs Google Play's (GOOG) (GOOGL) revenue. Therefore, we believe the entry of Apple into the metaverse game could significantly raise the company's monetization opportunities. Theories that Meta Platform has ambitions to displace Apple as the next-gen computing platform abound. However, we have also discussed thatMeta Platforms' eventual metaverse will unlikely be the only virtual world we will ever experience. Instead, the metaverse will likely be a series of interconnected virtual worlds that will be interoperable. So, Apple could still be the critical ecosystem owner as creators build their virtual worlds to be monetized through the App Store, reaching out to Apple's more than 1B (and growing) installed base.TrendForce also added that global VR content revenue is estimated to grow at a rapid 40% CAGR through 2025, reaching $8.3B. The content will be varied but primarily consisting of \"gaming/entertainment, videos, and social interactions.\" Therefore, Apple can continue to leverage such opportunities through its massive ecosystem. We think these opportunities are so novel that it hasn't even been written into Apple's consensus estimates just yet. But, once Apple's AR/VR devices are launched, we believe that the revenue runway could become even more apparent. However, we must still caution that we are still very early into Apple's metaverse ambitions. But, we believe that Apple will be a critical player in defining the metaverse through its ecosystem. It won't be very smart to consider that Apple doesn't have a clearly-defined metaverse strategy.So, is AAPL Stock a Buy Now?AAPL stock EV/NTM EBIT, and Normalized P/E (NTM) 3Y mean.If you consider AAPL stock's relative valuation against its 3Y mean, there's little doubt that AAPL stock seems expensive. It's trading at an EV/NTM EBIT of 26x, way above its 3Y mean of 19.3x. In addition, its normalized P/E (NTM) also read 31.2x, significantly ahead of its 3Y mean of 23.9x. Therefore, we wouldn't blame bearish investors who think that AAPL stock seems well overvalued now.Apple unlevered FCF estimates. Data source: S&P Capital IQ, authorHowever, we also estimated that AAPL stock would continue to generate robust FCF growth over time. Moreover, our model is even more conservative than the consensus estimates. In addition, we have also not considered Sensor Tower's estimates or Apple's metaverse opportunities that we discussed earlier. Nevertheless, it led us towards a DCF implied fair value estimate of $153, which we highlighted in our previous article. It's also quite close to our SOTP implied fair value of $159 that we showed earlier. Therefore, it's clear that these estimates have not factored for the robust services growth and the potential metaverse opportunities that could accrue to Apple over the next five to ten years.AAPL stock price action.Nevertheless, we think that AAPL stock looks extended, as seen above. But, as mentioned, it wouldn't be very smart for investors to bet against CEO Tim Cook & Co. The stock's long-term uptrend is clear for all to observe.So, we are clear that the stock would likely break the $200 level in 2022 as the excitement surrounding its AR/VR launch gets closers, coupled with its services segment revenue growth in its earnings releases. As a result, we believe that AAPL's stock price could be re-rated to reflect its potential over the next year.Nevertheless, due to its over-extended price action, we encourage some patience with AAPL stock. But, if you have no AAPL stock, we think you can consider adding at this price if you are a long-term investor. We don't believe it's significantly overvalued, as discussed earlier. But, if you already have considerable exposure relative to your portfolio, we think you can wait for a potentially better entry point with some patience.Therefore, we reiterate our Neutral rating on AAPL stock for now.This article was written by JR Research.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1062,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692483991,"gmtCreate":1641171088429,"gmtModify":1641171088704,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"liked","listText":"liked","text":"liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692483991","repostId":"2200544080","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":752,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692571086,"gmtCreate":1641105152889,"gmtModify":1641105153182,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692571086","repostId":"1173416252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173416252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1641085354,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1173416252?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-01-02 09:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng, NIO, Li Auto Report Big December Deliveries. That’s Good For Tesla<blockquote>小鹏汽车、蔚来、理想汽车报告12月份交付量较大。这对特斯拉有好处</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173416252","media":"Barrons","summary":"The three U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle makers started 2022 off with a bang, all reporting big delivery figures for December.NIO (ticker: NIO), XPeng (XPEV) and Li Auto (LI) on Saturday morning","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>The three U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle makers started 2022 off with a bang, all reporting big delivery figures for December.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>三家在美国上市的中国电动汽车制造商在2022年开局良好，均公布了12月份的大幅交付数据。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO), XPeng (XPEV) and Li Auto (LI) on Saturday morning each reported deliveries. Combined, the three shipped more than 40,000 units. That’s a monthly record and is one sign that Tesla (TSLA) should post its own big number when it reports fourth delivery figures in coming days.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）、小鹏汽车（XPEV）和理想汽车（LI）周六上午分别报告了交付情况。三者合计出货量超过4万台。这是一个月度记录，也是特斯拉(TSLA)在未来几天报告第四次交付数据时应该公布自己的大数字的一个迹象。</blockquote></p><p>About 25% of all Tesla deliveries are generated in China. Investors expect Tesla to report north of 280,000 deliveries worldwide for the fourth quarter.</p><p><blockquote>约25%的特斯拉交付量来自中国。投资者预计特斯拉第四季度全球交付量将超过28万辆。</blockquote></p><p>Among the Chinese three, XPeng took the December, and 2021, crown reporting 16,000 deliveries, a new monthly record. For all of 2021, XPeng delivered 98,155 vehicles, up 263% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>在中国三大汽车中，小鹏汽车在12月和2021年交付量为16,000辆，创下月度新纪录。2021年全年，小鹏汽车交付了98,155辆汽车，较2020年增长263%。</blockquote></p><p>Li delivered 14,087 units in December. That’s a monthly record for Li too. For all of 2021, Li delivered 90,491 vehicles, up 177% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Li在12月份交付了14,087台。这也是李的月度记录。2021年全年，理想汽车交付了90,491辆汽车，较2020年增长177%。</blockquote></p><p>NIO didn’t set a new monthly record, just missing it by a few hundred units. The company shipped 10,489 vehicles in December. NIO’s monthly delivery record came in November, when it shipped 10,878 units. For the full year, NIO delivered 91,429 vehicles in 2021, up 109% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来没有创造新的月度纪录，只是差了几百台。该公司12月份出货量为10,489辆。蔚来的月度交付记录出现在11月份，当时出货量为10,878辆。2021年全年，蔚来交付了91,429辆汽车，较2020年增长109%。</blockquote></p><p>Even though XPeng delivered more cars in 2021, NIO has still delivered the most of the three over the company’s life. NIO has delivered more than 167,000 vehicles life to date. XPeng and Li have delivered about 125,000 and 123,000 vehicle, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>尽管小鹏汽车在2021年交付了更多汽车，但蔚来在公司生命周期中仍然交付了这三款汽车中最多的。迄今为止，蔚来已交付超过167,000辆汽车。小鹏汽车和理想汽车分别交付了约125,000辆和123,000辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p>December vehicle deliveries for all EV producers might have been boosted by a subsidy cut coming for Chinese car buyers in 2022. Buyers rushed to get a slightly better deal. The Chinese purchase subsidy for an EV is about 10,000 Yuan, ($1,500), from 14,400 Yuan ($2,200). The $700 difference amounts to about a 2% price bump for typical EVs.</p><p><blockquote>2022年中国购车者补贴削减可能会提振所有电动汽车生产商12月份的汽车交付量。买家争先恐后地想要一个稍微好一点的交易。中国对电动汽车的购买补贴约为10,000元人民币（1,500美元），从14,400元人民币（2,200美元）起。700美元的差异相当于典型电动汽车的价格上涨约2%。</blockquote></p><p>Falling subsidies are one factor investors will have to consider regarding Tesla and Chinese EV makers in 2022. But higher December deliveries mean that earnings estimates for NIO, XPeng, Li, and likely Tesla, will rise in coming weeks. More cars than expected means more sales and better bottom line results.</p><p><blockquote>补贴下降是投资者在2022年考虑特斯拉和中国电动汽车制造商时必须考虑的因素之一。但12月份交付量的增加意味着蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车以及特斯拉的盈利预期将在未来几周内上升。比预期更多的汽车意味着更多的销量和更好的底线结果。</blockquote></p><p>Strong delivery results might also help shares early in 2022. Shares of Tesla, XPeng and Li had a good to great 2021, gaining 50%, 18% and 11%, respectively. NIO shares struggled, dropping 35% in 2021. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 27% and 19%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的交付业绩也可能有助于2022年初的股价上涨。特斯拉、小鹏汽车和理想汽车的股价在2021年表现良好，分别上涨50%、18%和11%。蔚来股价陷入困境，2021年下跌35%。标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数分别上涨27%和19%。</blockquote></p><p>Starting valuation is one reason for NIO stock’s struggles. Even after underperforming, NIO’s market capitalization is about $54 billion, more than the $43 billion market cap of XPeng and the $33 billion market cap of Li.</p><p><blockquote>开始估值是蔚来股票陷入困境的原因之一。即使表现不佳，蔚来的市值仍约为540亿美元，超过了小鹏汽车430亿美元的市值和理想汽车330亿美元的市值。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla, of course, ended 2021 with a market capitalization north of $1 trillion. It’s expected to deliver about 900,000 vehicles for 2021.</p><p><blockquote>当然，特斯拉在2021年底的市值超过1万亿美元。预计2021年将交付约90万辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng, NIO, Li Auto Report Big December Deliveries. That’s Good For Tesla<blockquote>小鹏汽车、蔚来、理想汽车报告12月份交付量较大。这对特斯拉有好处</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng, NIO, Li Auto Report Big December Deliveries. That’s Good For Tesla<blockquote>小鹏汽车、蔚来、理想汽车报告12月份交付量较大。这对特斯拉有好处</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-01-02 09:02</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>The three U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle makers started 2022 off with a bang, all reporting big delivery figures for December.</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>三家在美国上市的中国电动汽车制造商在2022年开局良好，均公布了12月份的大幅交付数据。</body></html></blockquote></p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO), XPeng (XPEV) and Li Auto (LI) on Saturday morning each reported deliveries. Combined, the three shipped more than 40,000 units. That’s a monthly record and is one sign that Tesla (TSLA) should post its own big number when it reports fourth delivery figures in coming days.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来（股票代码：蔚来）、小鹏汽车（XPEV）和理想汽车（LI）周六上午分别报告了交付情况。三者合计出货量超过4万台。这是一个月度记录，也是特斯拉(TSLA)在未来几天报告第四次交付数据时应该公布自己的大数字的一个迹象。</blockquote></p><p>About 25% of all Tesla deliveries are generated in China. Investors expect Tesla to report north of 280,000 deliveries worldwide for the fourth quarter.</p><p><blockquote>约25%的特斯拉交付量来自中国。投资者预计特斯拉第四季度全球交付量将超过28万辆。</blockquote></p><p>Among the Chinese three, XPeng took the December, and 2021, crown reporting 16,000 deliveries, a new monthly record. For all of 2021, XPeng delivered 98,155 vehicles, up 263% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>在中国三大汽车中，小鹏汽车在12月和2021年交付量为16,000辆，创下月度新纪录。2021年全年，小鹏汽车交付了98,155辆汽车，较2020年增长263%。</blockquote></p><p>Li delivered 14,087 units in December. That’s a monthly record for Li too. For all of 2021, Li delivered 90,491 vehicles, up 177% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Li在12月份交付了14,087台。这也是李的月度记录。2021年全年，理想汽车交付了90,491辆汽车，较2020年增长177%。</blockquote></p><p>NIO didn’t set a new monthly record, just missing it by a few hundred units. The company shipped 10,489 vehicles in December. NIO’s monthly delivery record came in November, when it shipped 10,878 units. For the full year, NIO delivered 91,429 vehicles in 2021, up 109% compared with 2020.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来没有创造新的月度纪录，只是差了几百台。该公司12月份出货量为10,489辆。蔚来的月度交付记录出现在11月份，当时出货量为10,878辆。2021年全年，蔚来交付了91,429辆汽车，较2020年增长109%。</blockquote></p><p>Even though XPeng delivered more cars in 2021, NIO has still delivered the most of the three over the company’s life. NIO has delivered more than 167,000 vehicles life to date. XPeng and Li have delivered about 125,000 and 123,000 vehicle, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>尽管小鹏汽车在2021年交付了更多汽车，但蔚来在公司生命周期中仍然交付了这三款汽车中最多的。迄今为止，蔚来已交付超过167,000辆汽车。小鹏汽车和理想汽车分别交付了约125,000辆和123,000辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p>December vehicle deliveries for all EV producers might have been boosted by a subsidy cut coming for Chinese car buyers in 2022. Buyers rushed to get a slightly better deal. The Chinese purchase subsidy for an EV is about 10,000 Yuan, ($1,500), from 14,400 Yuan ($2,200). The $700 difference amounts to about a 2% price bump for typical EVs.</p><p><blockquote>2022年中国购车者补贴削减可能会提振所有电动汽车生产商12月份的汽车交付量。买家争先恐后地想要一个稍微好一点的交易。中国对电动汽车的购买补贴约为10,000元人民币（1,500美元），从14,400元人民币（2,200美元）起。700美元的差异相当于典型电动汽车的价格上涨约2%。</blockquote></p><p>Falling subsidies are one factor investors will have to consider regarding Tesla and Chinese EV makers in 2022. But higher December deliveries mean that earnings estimates for NIO, XPeng, Li, and likely Tesla, will rise in coming weeks. More cars than expected means more sales and better bottom line results.</p><p><blockquote>补贴下降是投资者在2022年考虑特斯拉和中国电动汽车制造商时必须考虑的因素之一。但12月份交付量的增加意味着蔚来、小鹏汽车、理想汽车以及特斯拉的盈利预期将在未来几周内上升。比预期更多的汽车意味着更多的销量和更好的底线结果。</blockquote></p><p>Strong delivery results might also help shares early in 2022. Shares of Tesla, XPeng and Li had a good to great 2021, gaining 50%, 18% and 11%, respectively. NIO shares struggled, dropping 35% in 2021. The S&amp;P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 27% and 19%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>强劲的交付业绩也可能有助于2022年初的股价上涨。特斯拉、小鹏汽车和理想汽车的股价在2021年表现良好，分别上涨50%、18%和11%。蔚来股价陷入困境，2021年下跌35%。标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数分别上涨27%和19%。</blockquote></p><p>Starting valuation is one reason for NIO stock’s struggles. Even after underperforming, NIO’s market capitalization is about $54 billion, more than the $43 billion market cap of XPeng and the $33 billion market cap of Li.</p><p><blockquote>开始估值是蔚来股票陷入困境的原因之一。即使表现不佳，蔚来的市值仍约为540亿美元，超过了小鹏汽车430亿美元的市值和理想汽车330亿美元的市值。</blockquote></p><p>Tesla, of course, ended 2021 with a market capitalization north of $1 trillion. It’s expected to deliver about 900,000 vehicles for 2021.</p><p><blockquote>当然，特斯拉在2021年底的市值超过1万亿美元。预计2021年将交付约90万辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/xpeng-nio-li-auto-report-big-december-deliveries-thats-good-for-tesla-51641056522?mod=newsviewer_click_seemore\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/xpeng-nio-li-auto-report-big-december-deliveries-thats-good-for-tesla-51641056522?mod=newsviewer_click_seemore","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1173416252","content_text":"The three U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle makers started 2022 off with a bang, all reporting big delivery figures for December.NIO (ticker: NIO), XPeng (XPEV) and Li Auto (LI) on Saturday morning each reported deliveries. Combined, the three shipped more than 40,000 units. That’s a monthly record and is one sign that Tesla (TSLA) should post its own big number when it reports fourth delivery figures in coming days.About 25% of all Tesla deliveries are generated in China. Investors expect Tesla to report north of 280,000 deliveries worldwide for the fourth quarter.Among the Chinese three, XPeng took the December, and 2021, crown reporting 16,000 deliveries, a new monthly record. For all of 2021, XPeng delivered 98,155 vehicles, up 263% compared with 2020.Li delivered 14,087 units in December. That’s a monthly record for Li too. For all of 2021, Li delivered 90,491 vehicles, up 177% compared with 2020.NIO didn’t set a new monthly record, just missing it by a few hundred units. The company shipped 10,489 vehicles in December. NIO’s monthly delivery record came in November, when it shipped 10,878 units. For the full year, NIO delivered 91,429 vehicles in 2021, up 109% compared with 2020.Even though XPeng delivered more cars in 2021, NIO has still delivered the most of the three over the company’s life. NIO has delivered more than 167,000 vehicles life to date. XPeng and Li have delivered about 125,000 and 123,000 vehicle, respectively.December vehicle deliveries for all EV producers might have been boosted by a subsidy cut coming for Chinese car buyers in 2022. Buyers rushed to get a slightly better deal. The Chinese purchase subsidy for an EV is about 10,000 Yuan, ($1,500), from 14,400 Yuan ($2,200). The $700 difference amounts to about a 2% price bump for typical EVs.Falling subsidies are one factor investors will have to consider regarding Tesla and Chinese EV makers in 2022. But higher December deliveries mean that earnings estimates for NIO, XPeng, Li, and likely Tesla, will rise in coming weeks. More cars than expected means more sales and better bottom line results.Strong delivery results might also help shares early in 2022. Shares of Tesla, XPeng and Li had a good to great 2021, gaining 50%, 18% and 11%, respectively. NIO shares struggled, dropping 35% in 2021. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 27% and 19%, respectively.Starting valuation is one reason for NIO stock’s struggles. Even after underperforming, NIO’s market capitalization is about $54 billion, more than the $43 billion market cap of XPeng and the $33 billion market cap of Li.Tesla, of course, ended 2021 with a market capitalization north of $1 trillion. It’s expected to deliver about 900,000 vehicles for 2021.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"LI":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":766,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692868480,"gmtCreate":1640917283965,"gmtModify":1640917284223,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692868480","repostId":"1165872157","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165872157","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640916426,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1165872157?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-31 10:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Nio, EVgo, and XL Fleet Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么蔚来、EVgo和XL车队股票今天上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165872157","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happenedOne day after the American depositary shares of Chinese EV maker Nio(NYSE:NIO)hit their","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>What happened</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>发生了什么</body></html></blockquote></p><p>One day after the American depositary shares of Chinese EV maker <b>Nio</b>(NYSE:NIO)hit their lowest level in over a year, the shares are jumping today. And the stocks of EV-charging network company <b>EVgo</b>(NASDAQ:EVGO)and vehicle electrification company <b>XL Fleet</b>(NYSE:XL)are also on the rise. The stocks had moved as follows as today:</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商美国存托股票发行一天后<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来）触及一年多来的最低水平，股价今天上涨。以及电动汽车充电网络公司的股票<b>EVgo</b>（纳斯达克：EVGO）和汽车电动化公司<b>XL舰队</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）也在上升。股票今天的走势如下：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Nio shares up 14.76%</li><li>EVgo shares up 9.08%</li><li>XL Fleet shares up 7.9%</li></ul>So what</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>蔚来股价上涨14.76%</li><li>EVgo股价上涨9.08%</li><li>XL Fleet股价上涨7.9%</li></ul>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p>The thing is, these stocks have very little in common, other than the glaring fact that they all are in the electric vehicle sector. And that tells the story of today&#39;s big moves. Though these businesses have not exactly been moving in the same direction, the stock prices have. They are all down significantly in 2021. XL Fleet shares have dropped 59% year to date, while EVgo and Nio stocks are down 37% and 35%, respectively. But the businesses aren&#39;t quite as synchronized. Nio&#39;s sales are growing quickly, and it announced some exciting plans for next year, including the introduction of its latest EV that it hopes will challenge the <b>Tesla</b> Model 3.</p><p><blockquote>问题是，除了它们都属于电动汽车行业这一明显事实之外，这些股票几乎没有共同点。这讲述了今天的大动作。尽管这些业务并没有完全朝着同一个方向发展，但股价却朝着同一个方向发展。2021年都大幅下降。XL Fleet股价今年迄今已下跌59%，而EVgo和蔚来股价分别下跌37%和35%。但这些业务并不完全同步。蔚来的销量正在快速增长，并宣布了明年一些令人兴奋的计划，包括推出最新的电动汽车，希望这将挑战<b>特斯拉</b>模型3。</blockquote></p><p>Nio told investors it expects to begin deliveries of the new ET5 in the fourth quarter of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来告诉投资者，预计将于2022年第四季度开始交付新款ET5。</blockquote></p><p>Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在怎么办</blockquote></p><p>Nio is clearly the largest of these stocks, and likely the closest to profitability. With today&#39;s move, Nio has a market capitalization of about $52 billion. Compare that to EVgo&#39;s valuation of $2.7 billion and XL Fleet at just over $500 million. There&#39;s a good reason for that, too.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来显然是这些股票中规模最大的，也可能是最接近盈利的。通过今天的举措，蔚来的市值约为520亿美元。相比之下，EVgo的估值为27亿美元，XL Fleet的估值略高于5亿美元。这也有一个很好的理由。</blockquote></p><p>In addition to Nio&#39;s new ET5 coming late next year, it will begin selling its new, larger luxury sedan in March 2022. And beyond the ET5 and larger ET7, Nio has said it plans a third new offering next year. That may come from a collaboration with the largest automotive company in China, but it has yet to be officially announced.</p><p><blockquote>除了明年年底推出的蔚来新款ET5外，它还将于2022年3月开始销售其新款、更大的豪华轿车。除了ET5和更大的ET7之外，蔚来还表示计划明年推出第三款新产品。这可能来自与中国最大的汽车公司的合作，但尚未正式宣布。</blockquote></p><p>Nio is also continuing to move outside of China as it expands the growth it began in Europe in 2021. EVgo and XL Fleet also have plans to grow, but the results are coming much slower than with Nio. XL Fleet, for example, saw its third-quarter revenue nearly cut in half compared to the third quarter of 2020. XL Fleet converts internal combustion-powered vehicles to plug-in hybrid electric power. It also plans to have a fully electrical conversion solution soon. But as auto manufacturers have struggled to keep up with demand amid supply chain constraints this year, the company hasn&#39;t been able to drive the growth it had hoped for.</p><p><blockquote>随着2021年在欧洲开始的增长，蔚来也在继续走出中国。EVgo和XL车队也有增长计划，但结果比蔚来慢得多。例如，与2020年第三季度相比，XL Fleet第三季度的收入几乎减少了一半。XL车队将内燃机动力车辆转换为插电式混合动力。它还计划很快推出全电动转换解决方案。但由于今年汽车制造商在供应链限制的情况下难以满足需求，该公司未能推动其所希望的增长。</blockquote></p><p>However, XL Fleet recently announced it has grown its relationship with utility-scale wind and solar power facilities operators for charging infrastructure to support the fleet vehicles it has already provided. It is also in a pilot program with the Department of Defense that it hopes could grow into a large opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>然而，XL Fleet最近宣布，它已经发展了与公用事业规模的风能和太阳能发电设施运营商在充电基础设施方面的关系，以支持其已经提供的车队车辆。它还与国防部进行了一项试点计划，希望该计划能够发展成为一个巨大的机会。</blockquote></p><p>So while Nio and EVgo are growing as EV demand and adoption grows, XL Fleet is struggling at this point. That partially explains the vast disparity in the valuations assigned by investors. But for today, they are all being lumped in the same boat as investors are pushing EV sector names higher moving into the final trading day of the year.</p><p><blockquote>因此，虽然蔚来和EVgo随着电动汽车需求和采用率的增长而增长，但XL车队目前却陷入困境。这部分解释了投资者估值的巨大差异。但今天，随着投资者在今年的最后一个交易日推动电动汽车行业股票走高，它们都被归入同一条船上。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Nio, EVgo, and XL Fleet Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么蔚来、EVgo和XL车队股票今天上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Nio, EVgo, and XL Fleet Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么蔚来、EVgo和XL车队股票今天上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-31 10:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>What happened</p><p><blockquote><html><head></head><body>发生了什么</body></html></blockquote></p><p>One day after the American depositary shares of Chinese EV maker <b>Nio</b>(NYSE:NIO)hit their lowest level in over a year, the shares are jumping today. And the stocks of EV-charging network company <b>EVgo</b>(NASDAQ:EVGO)and vehicle electrification company <b>XL Fleet</b>(NYSE:XL)are also on the rise. The stocks had moved as follows as today:</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商美国存托股票发行一天后<b>蔚来</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：蔚来）触及一年多来的最低水平，股价今天上涨。以及电动汽车充电网络公司的股票<b>EVgo</b>（纳斯达克：EVGO）和汽车电动化公司<b>XL舰队</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：XL）也在上升。股票今天的走势如下：</blockquote></p><p><ul><li>Nio shares up 14.76%</li><li>EVgo shares up 9.08%</li><li>XL Fleet shares up 7.9%</li></ul>So what</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>蔚来股价上涨14.76%</li><li>EVgo股价上涨9.08%</li><li>XL Fleet股价上涨7.9%</li></ul>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p>The thing is, these stocks have very little in common, other than the glaring fact that they all are in the electric vehicle sector. And that tells the story of today&#39;s big moves. Though these businesses have not exactly been moving in the same direction, the stock prices have. They are all down significantly in 2021. XL Fleet shares have dropped 59% year to date, while EVgo and Nio stocks are down 37% and 35%, respectively. But the businesses aren&#39;t quite as synchronized. Nio&#39;s sales are growing quickly, and it announced some exciting plans for next year, including the introduction of its latest EV that it hopes will challenge the <b>Tesla</b> Model 3.</p><p><blockquote>问题是，除了它们都属于电动汽车行业这一明显事实之外，这些股票几乎没有共同点。这讲述了今天的大动作。尽管这些业务并没有完全朝着同一个方向发展，但股价却朝着同一个方向发展。2021年都大幅下降。XL Fleet股价今年迄今已下跌59%，而EVgo和蔚来股价分别下跌37%和35%。但这些业务并不完全同步。蔚来的销量正在快速增长，并宣布了明年一些令人兴奋的计划，包括推出最新的电动汽车，希望这将挑战<b>特斯拉</b>模型3。</blockquote></p><p>Nio told investors it expects to begin deliveries of the new ET5 in the fourth quarter of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来告诉投资者，预计将于2022年第四季度开始交付新款ET5。</blockquote></p><p>Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在怎么办</blockquote></p><p>Nio is clearly the largest of these stocks, and likely the closest to profitability. With today&#39;s move, Nio has a market capitalization of about $52 billion. Compare that to EVgo&#39;s valuation of $2.7 billion and XL Fleet at just over $500 million. There&#39;s a good reason for that, too.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来显然是这些股票中规模最大的，也可能是最接近盈利的。通过今天的举措，蔚来的市值约为520亿美元。相比之下，EVgo的估值为27亿美元，XL Fleet的估值略高于5亿美元。这也有一个很好的理由。</blockquote></p><p>In addition to Nio&#39;s new ET5 coming late next year, it will begin selling its new, larger luxury sedan in March 2022. And beyond the ET5 and larger ET7, Nio has said it plans a third new offering next year. That may come from a collaboration with the largest automotive company in China, but it has yet to be officially announced.</p><p><blockquote>除了明年年底推出的蔚来新款ET5外，它还将于2022年3月开始销售其新款、更大的豪华轿车。除了ET5和更大的ET7之外，蔚来还表示计划明年推出第三款新产品。这可能来自与中国最大的汽车公司的合作，但尚未正式宣布。</blockquote></p><p>Nio is also continuing to move outside of China as it expands the growth it began in Europe in 2021. EVgo and XL Fleet also have plans to grow, but the results are coming much slower than with Nio. XL Fleet, for example, saw its third-quarter revenue nearly cut in half compared to the third quarter of 2020. XL Fleet converts internal combustion-powered vehicles to plug-in hybrid electric power. It also plans to have a fully electrical conversion solution soon. But as auto manufacturers have struggled to keep up with demand amid supply chain constraints this year, the company hasn&#39;t been able to drive the growth it had hoped for.</p><p><blockquote>随着2021年在欧洲开始的增长，蔚来也在继续走出中国。EVgo和XL车队也有增长计划，但结果比蔚来慢得多。例如，与2020年第三季度相比，XL Fleet第三季度的收入几乎减少了一半。XL车队将内燃机动力车辆转换为插电式混合动力。它还计划很快推出全电动转换解决方案。但由于今年汽车制造商在供应链限制的情况下难以满足需求，该公司未能推动其所希望的增长。</blockquote></p><p>However, XL Fleet recently announced it has grown its relationship with utility-scale wind and solar power facilities operators for charging infrastructure to support the fleet vehicles it has already provided. It is also in a pilot program with the Department of Defense that it hopes could grow into a large opportunity.</p><p><blockquote>然而，XL Fleet最近宣布，它已经发展了与公用事业规模的风能和太阳能发电设施运营商在充电基础设施方面的关系，以支持其已经提供的车队车辆。它还与国防部进行了一项试点计划，希望该计划能够发展成为一个巨大的机会。</blockquote></p><p>So while Nio and EVgo are growing as EV demand and adoption grows, XL Fleet is struggling at this point. That partially explains the vast disparity in the valuations assigned by investors. But for today, they are all being lumped in the same boat as investors are pushing EV sector names higher moving into the final trading day of the year.</p><p><blockquote>因此，虽然蔚来和EVgo随着电动汽车需求和采用率的增长而增长，但XL车队目前却陷入困境。这部分解释了投资者估值的巨大差异。但今天，随着投资者在今年的最后一个交易日推动电动汽车行业股票走高，它们都被归入同一条船上。</blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/30/why-nio-evgo-and-xl-fleet-stocks-jumped-today/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","EVGO":"EVgo Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/30/why-nio-evgo-and-xl-fleet-stocks-jumped-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165872157","content_text":"What happenedOne day after the American depositary shares of Chinese EV maker Nio(NYSE:NIO)hit their lowest level in over a year, the shares are jumping today. And the stocks of EV-charging network company EVgo(NASDAQ:EVGO)and vehicle electrification company XL Fleet(NYSE:XL)are also on the rise. The stocks had moved as follows as today:Nio shares up 14.76%EVgo shares up 9.08%XL Fleet shares up 7.9%So whatThe thing is, these stocks have very little in common, other than the glaring fact that they all are in the electric vehicle sector. And that tells the story of today's big moves. Though these businesses have not exactly been moving in the same direction, the stock prices have. They are all down significantly in 2021. XL Fleet shares have dropped 59% year to date, while EVgo and Nio stocks are down 37% and 35%, respectively. But the businesses aren't quite as synchronized. Nio's sales are growing quickly, and it announced some exciting plans for next year, including the introduction of its latest EV that it hopes will challenge the Tesla Model 3.Nio told investors it expects to begin deliveries of the new ET5 in the fourth quarter of 2022.Now whatNio is clearly the largest of these stocks, and likely the closest to profitability. With today's move, Nio has a market capitalization of about $52 billion. Compare that to EVgo's valuation of $2.7 billion and XL Fleet at just over $500 million. There's a good reason for that, too.In addition to Nio's new ET5 coming late next year, it will begin selling its new, larger luxury sedan in March 2022. And beyond the ET5 and larger ET7, Nio has said it plans a third new offering next year. That may come from a collaboration with the largest automotive company in China, but it has yet to be officially announced.Nio is also continuing to move outside of China as it expands the growth it began in Europe in 2021. EVgo and XL Fleet also have plans to grow, but the results are coming much slower than with Nio. XL Fleet, for example, saw its third-quarter revenue nearly cut in half compared to the third quarter of 2020. XL Fleet converts internal combustion-powered vehicles to plug-in hybrid electric power. It also plans to have a fully electrical conversion solution soon. But as auto manufacturers have struggled to keep up with demand amid supply chain constraints this year, the company hasn't been able to drive the growth it had hoped for.However, XL Fleet recently announced it has grown its relationship with utility-scale wind and solar power facilities operators for charging infrastructure to support the fleet vehicles it has already provided. It is also in a pilot program with the Department of Defense that it hopes could grow into a large opportunity.So while Nio and EVgo are growing as EV demand and adoption grows, XL Fleet is struggling at this point. That partially explains the vast disparity in the valuations assigned by investors. But for today, they are all being lumped in the same boat as investors are pushing EV sector names higher moving into the final trading day of the year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XL":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"EVGO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":934,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692902126,"gmtCreate":1640820889589,"gmtModify":1640820889848,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692902126","repostId":"2195466435","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":928,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696467902,"gmtCreate":1640749786434,"gmtModify":1640749786697,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"up and up","listText":"up and up","text":"up and up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696467902","repostId":"1169856412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169856412","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640748590,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169856412?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-29 11:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s What Apple Stock Needs To Hit To Be Worth $3 Trillion<blockquote>苹果股价需要达到3万亿美元</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169856412","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple (AAPL) stock is again back in the spotlight on Tuesday.\nNot that it’s hard for the tech giant ","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>)&nbsp;stock is again back in the spotlight on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(<b>AAPL</b>）周二，该股再次成为人们关注的焦点。</blockquote></p><p> Not that it’s hard for the tech giant to find itself there, but it comes as the stock makes another push back to&nbsp;the $3 trillion market cap level.</p><p><blockquote>并不是说这家科技巨头很难找到自己的位置，但与此同时，该股的市值再次回升至3万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> To get there, Apple stock needs to climb to roughly $182.85 — let’s just call it $183.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这一目标，苹果股价需要攀升至182.85美元左右——看涨期权价格为183美元。</blockquote></p><p> What’s been difficult is that the $180 area has become an area of resistance.</p><p><blockquote>困难的是180美元区域已经成为阻力区域。</blockquote></p><p> We have actually been pretty fortunate when it comes to trading Apple stock.</p><p><blockquote>在交易苹果股票方面，我们实际上非常幸运。</blockquote></p><p> On its first push to the $3 trillion level, we were selling the news and&nbsp;looking for a bearish reversal.</p><p><blockquote>在其首次突破3万亿美元水平时，我们正在抛售这一消息并寻找看跌逆转。</blockquote></p><p> That worked out as Apple corrected lower. However, that set up a&nbsp;pretty sweet bounce play&nbsp;that has been paying traders pretty well over the past few days.</p><p><blockquote>当苹果修正走低时，这种情况得到了解决。然而，这引发了一场相当不错的反弹行情，在过去几天里给交易者带来了丰厚的回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the risk of over-saturating our Apple discussion, how do the charts look now as it makes another push back up toward this key zone?</p><p><blockquote>冒着让我们的苹果讨论过度饱和的风险，当它再次向这个关键区域反弹时，图表现在看起来如何？</blockquote></p><p> Trading Apple Stock</p><p><blockquote>交易苹果股票</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29cb7696d6e38eacaddae770a857ff3d\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"741\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Apple stock.Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果股票日线图。图表由TrendSpider.com提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Apple’s powerful bounce off the 21-day moving average and rotation up through the 10-day has given the stock new life.</p><p><blockquote>苹果从21日移动平均线强劲反弹并在10日移动平均线上轮动，赋予了该股新的生命。</blockquote></p><p> However, this $180 zone has been tricky thus far. One will notice how the stock tested up into this area on Tuesday and then struggled.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到目前为止，180美元区域一直很棘手。人们会注意到该股周二如何测试到该区域，然后陷入困境。</blockquote></p><p> It’s not unlike what we’re seeing&nbsp;with Meta&nbsp;(<b>MVRS</b>), although admittedly, the stock is not trading at all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>这与我们在Meta中看到的没有什么不同（<b>MVRS</b>），尽管不可否认，该股的交易价格并未达到历史高点。</blockquote></p><p> From here, bulls want to see a push up through the all-time high, at $182.13. That opens the door directly to the $3 trillion market cap level — at $182.85-ish — and more new highs.</p><p><blockquote>从这里开始，多头希望看到价格突破182.13美元的历史高点。这直接打开了通往3万亿美元市值水平（约182.85美元）以及更多新高的大门。</blockquote></p><p> The flip side of that scenario is that the $180 area holds as resistance.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况的另一面是180美元区域仍是阻力位。</blockquote></p><p> In that case, I want to see the 10-day moving average hold as support on the pullback. A break of this level puts the 21-day moving average back in play again, but it would be much healthier for the former to hold as support and for the latter to not be tested.</p><p><blockquote>在这种情况下，我希望看到10日移动平均线作为回调的支撑。突破这一水平将使21日移动平均线再次发挥作用，但前者保持支撑而后者不受测试会更健康。</blockquote></p><p> In either scenario — the breakout or the pullback — investors will ultimately be looking for $3 trillion and new all-time highs eventually.</p><p><blockquote>无论哪种情况——突破还是回调——投资者最终都将寻求3万亿美元和历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <i>When</i>&nbsp;Apple gets there — not if — it will have longer-term bulls sniffing for the $188 to $194 area, where the stock finds multiple upside extension levels.</p><p><blockquote><i>何时</i>苹果实现了这一目标——而不是如果——它将让长期多头嗅探188美元至194美元区域，该股将在该区域找到多个上行延伸水平。</blockquote></p><p> Above $195 and the obvious is in play: $200.</p><p><blockquote>高于195美元，显而易见的是：200美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s What Apple Stock Needs To Hit To Be Worth $3 Trillion<blockquote>苹果股价需要达到3万亿美元</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s What Apple Stock Needs To Hit To Be Worth $3 Trillion<blockquote>苹果股价需要达到3万亿美元</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-29 11:29</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>)&nbsp;stock is again back in the spotlight on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(<b>AAPL</b>）周二，该股再次成为人们关注的焦点。</blockquote></p><p> Not that it’s hard for the tech giant to find itself there, but it comes as the stock makes another push back to&nbsp;the $3 trillion market cap level.</p><p><blockquote>并不是说这家科技巨头很难找到自己的位置，但与此同时，该股的市值再次回升至3万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> To get there, Apple stock needs to climb to roughly $182.85 — let’s just call it $183.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这一目标，苹果股价需要攀升至182.85美元左右——看涨期权价格为183美元。</blockquote></p><p> What’s been difficult is that the $180 area has become an area of resistance.</p><p><blockquote>困难的是180美元区域已经成为阻力区域。</blockquote></p><p> We have actually been pretty fortunate when it comes to trading Apple stock.</p><p><blockquote>在交易苹果股票方面，我们实际上非常幸运。</blockquote></p><p> On its first push to the $3 trillion level, we were selling the news and&nbsp;looking for a bearish reversal.</p><p><blockquote>在其首次突破3万亿美元水平时，我们正在抛售这一消息并寻找看跌逆转。</blockquote></p><p> That worked out as Apple corrected lower. However, that set up a&nbsp;pretty sweet bounce play&nbsp;that has been paying traders pretty well over the past few days.</p><p><blockquote>当苹果修正走低时，这种情况得到了解决。然而，这引发了一场相当不错的反弹行情，在过去几天里给交易者带来了丰厚的回报。</blockquote></p><p> At the risk of over-saturating our Apple discussion, how do the charts look now as it makes another push back up toward this key zone?</p><p><blockquote>冒着让我们的苹果讨论过度饱和的风险，当它再次向这个关键区域反弹时，图表现在看起来如何？</blockquote></p><p> Trading Apple Stock</p><p><blockquote>交易苹果股票</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29cb7696d6e38eacaddae770a857ff3d\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"741\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Apple stock.Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>苹果股票日线图。图表由TrendSpider.com提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Apple’s powerful bounce off the 21-day moving average and rotation up through the 10-day has given the stock new life.</p><p><blockquote>苹果从21日移动平均线强劲反弹并在10日移动平均线上轮动，赋予了该股新的生命。</blockquote></p><p> However, this $180 zone has been tricky thus far. One will notice how the stock tested up into this area on Tuesday and then struggled.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到目前为止，180美元区域一直很棘手。人们会注意到该股周二如何测试到该区域，然后陷入困境。</blockquote></p><p> It’s not unlike what we’re seeing&nbsp;with Meta&nbsp;(<b>MVRS</b>), although admittedly, the stock is not trading at all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>这与我们在Meta中看到的没有什么不同（<b>MVRS</b>），尽管不可否认，该股的交易价格并未达到历史高点。</blockquote></p><p> From here, bulls want to see a push up through the all-time high, at $182.13. That opens the door directly to the $3 trillion market cap level — at $182.85-ish — and more new highs.</p><p><blockquote>从这里开始，多头希望看到价格突破182.13美元的历史高点。这直接打开了通往3万亿美元市值水平（约182.85美元）以及更多新高的大门。</blockquote></p><p> The flip side of that scenario is that the $180 area holds as resistance.</p><p><blockquote>这种情况的另一面是180美元区域仍是阻力位。</blockquote></p><p> In that case, I want to see the 10-day moving average hold as support on the pullback. A break of this level puts the 21-day moving average back in play again, but it would be much healthier for the former to hold as support and for the latter to not be tested.</p><p><blockquote>在这种情况下，我希望看到10日移动平均线作为回调的支撑。突破这一水平将使21日移动平均线再次发挥作用，但前者保持支撑而后者不受测试会更健康。</blockquote></p><p> In either scenario — the breakout or the pullback — investors will ultimately be looking for $3 trillion and new all-time highs eventually.</p><p><blockquote>无论哪种情况——突破还是回调——投资者最终都将寻求3万亿美元和历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <i>When</i>&nbsp;Apple gets there — not if — it will have longer-term bulls sniffing for the $188 to $194 area, where the stock finds multiple upside extension levels.</p><p><blockquote><i>何时</i>苹果实现了这一目标——而不是如果——它将让长期多头嗅探188美元至194美元区域，该股将在该区域找到多个上行延伸水平。</blockquote></p><p> Above $195 and the obvious is in play: $200.</p><p><blockquote>高于195美元，显而易见的是：200美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-apple-aapl-stock-3-trillion-market-cap-end-of-year\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-apple-aapl-stock-3-trillion-market-cap-end-of-year","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169856412","content_text":"Apple (AAPL) stock is again back in the spotlight on Tuesday.\nNot that it’s hard for the tech giant to find itself there, but it comes as the stock makes another push back to the $3 trillion market cap level.\nTo get there, Apple stock needs to climb to roughly $182.85 — let’s just call it $183.\nWhat’s been difficult is that the $180 area has become an area of resistance.\nWe have actually been pretty fortunate when it comes to trading Apple stock.\nOn its first push to the $3 trillion level, we were selling the news and looking for a bearish reversal.\nThat worked out as Apple corrected lower. However, that set up a pretty sweet bounce play that has been paying traders pretty well over the past few days.\nAt the risk of over-saturating our Apple discussion, how do the charts look now as it makes another push back up toward this key zone?\nTrading Apple Stock\nDaily chart of Apple stock.Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com\nApple’s powerful bounce off the 21-day moving average and rotation up through the 10-day has given the stock new life.\nHowever, this $180 zone has been tricky thus far. One will notice how the stock tested up into this area on Tuesday and then struggled.\nIt’s not unlike what we’re seeing with Meta (MVRS), although admittedly, the stock is not trading at all-time highs.\nFrom here, bulls want to see a push up through the all-time high, at $182.13. That opens the door directly to the $3 trillion market cap level — at $182.85-ish — and more new highs.\nThe flip side of that scenario is that the $180 area holds as resistance.\nIn that case, I want to see the 10-day moving average hold as support on the pullback. A break of this level puts the 21-day moving average back in play again, but it would be much healthier for the former to hold as support and for the latter to not be tested.\nIn either scenario — the breakout or the pullback — investors will ultimately be looking for $3 trillion and new all-time highs eventually.\nWhen Apple gets there — not if — it will have longer-term bulls sniffing for the $188 to $194 area, where the stock finds multiple upside extension levels.\nAbove $195 and the obvious is in play: $200.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1129,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696121475,"gmtCreate":1640652125168,"gmtModify":1640652125439,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"up pls","listText":"up pls","text":"up pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696121475","repostId":"1127506895","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127506895","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640649773,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1127506895?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-28 08:02","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Bourse Likely To Bounce Higher Again On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能再次反弹走高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127506895","media":"RTTNews","summary":"The Singapore stock market on Monday snapped the four-day winning streak in which it had gathered al","content":"<p>The Singapore stock market on Monday snapped the four-day winning streak in which it had gathered almost 35 points or 1.2 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,105-point plateau although it's expected to rebound on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>新加坡股市周一结束了连续四天的上涨，上涨了近35点或1.2%。海峡时报指数目前略低于3,105点的高位，尽管预计周二将反弹。</blockquote></p><p> The global forecast for the Asian&nbsp;marketsis optimistic on easing fears regarding the Omicron variant of the coronavirus. The European markets were mixed and the U.S. bourses were up and the Asian markets figure to split the difference.</p><p><blockquote>对亚洲市场的全球预测对缓解对冠状病毒奥密克戎变种的担忧持乐观态度。欧洲市场涨跌互现，美国股市上涨，亚洲市场似乎分担了这一差异。</blockquote></p><p> The STI finished slightly lower on Monday following losses from the financials, gains from the properties and a mixed picture from the industrials.</p><p><blockquote>继金融股下跌、房地产股上涨以及工业股涨跌互现后，海指周一小幅收低。</blockquote></p><p> For the day, the index fell 4.04 points or 0.13 percent to finish at 3,104.24 after trading between 3,104.24 and 3,113.55. Volume was 863.6 million shares worth 394.2 million Singapore dollars. There were 190 gainers and 139 decliners.</p><p><blockquote>当天，该指数在3,104.24点至3,113.55点之间交易后，下跌4.04点或0.13%，收于3,104.24点。成交量为8.636亿股，价值3.942亿新元。上涨190家，下跌139家。</blockquote></p><p> Among the actives, Ascendas REIT and DBS Group both fell 0.34 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust and Mapletree Commercial Trust both climbed 0.50 percent, City Developments rallied 0.60 percent, Comfort DelGro advanced 0.73 percent, Dairy Farm International surged 2.56 percent, Genting Singapore jumped 0.65 percent, Keppel Corp and Hongkong Land both dropped 0.58 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation eased 0.18 percent, SATS rose 0.26 percent, Singapore Exchange spiked 0.98 percent, Singapore Press Holdings added 0.43 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering shed 0.53 percent, Thai Beverage accelerated 0.76 percent, United Overseas Bank sank 0.60 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.49 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding soared 1.54 percent and Mapletree Logistics Trust, SembCorp Industries, Singapore Airlines and SingTel were unchanged.</p><p><blockquote>活跃股中，腾飞房地产投资信托基金和星展集团均下跌0.34%，凯德综合商业信托和丰树商业信托均上涨0.50%，City Developments上涨0.60%，Comfort DelGro上涨0.73%，Dairy Farm International飙升2.56%，云顶新加坡上涨0.65%，吉宝企业和香港置地均下跌0.58%，华侨银行下跌0.18%，SATS上涨0.26%，新加坡交易所飙升0.98%，新加坡科技工程下跌0.53%，大华银行下跌0.60%，丰益国际下跌0.49%，扬子江造船飙升1.54%，丰树物流信托、胜科工业、新加坡航空和新加坡电信持平。</blockquote></p><p> The lead from Wall Street is solid as the major averages opened higher on Monday and accelerated as the day progressed, ending at or near record closing highs.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的领先优势稳固，主要股指周一开盘走高，并随着时间的推移加速上涨，收于或接近历史收盘高点。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow spiked 351.82 points or 0.98 percent to finish at 36,302.38, while the NASDAQ surged 217.89 points or 1.39 percent to end at 15,871.26 and the S&amp;P 500 gained 65.40 points or 1.38 percent to close at 4,791.19.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数飙升351.82点，涨幅0.98%，收于36,302.38点；纳斯达克飙升217.89点，涨幅1.39%，收于15,871.26点；标普500上涨65.40点，涨幅1.38%，收于4,791.19点。</blockquote></p><p> The continued strength on Wall Street came amid easing concerns about the economic impact of the Omicron variant of the&nbsp;coronavirus. While Omicron seems to be more transmissible, the new strain purportedly causes milder symptoms and could accelerate the end of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街持续走强之际，人们对冠状病毒奥密克戎变种对经济影响的担忧有所缓解。虽然奥密克戎病毒似乎更具传染性，但据称这种新毒株会引起较轻的症状，并可能加速大流行的结束。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks may also have benefitted from so-called window-dressing going into the end of the year, with traders looking to boost the value of the portfolios.</p><p><blockquote>随着交易员希望提高投资组合的价值，股市也可能受益于年底所谓的门面装饰。</blockquote></p><p> Crude oil futures ended sharply higher Monday amid hopes the Omicron variant will not any significantly impact global economic recovery. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for February ended up by $1.78 or 2.4 percent at $75.57 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>由于希望奥密克戎变种不会对全球经济复苏产生任何重大影响，原油期货周一大幅收高。西德克萨斯中质原油2月期货收涨1.78美元或2.4%，报每桶75.57美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1626938412129","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Bourse Likely To Bounce Higher Again On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能再次反弹走高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Bourse Likely To Bounce Higher Again On Tuesday<blockquote>新加坡股市周二可能再次反弹走高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">RTTNews</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-28 08:02</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Singapore stock market on Monday snapped the four-day winning streak in which it had gathered almost 35 points or 1.2 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,105-point plateau although it's expected to rebound on Tuesday.</p><p><blockquote>新加坡股市周一结束了连续四天的上涨，上涨了近35点或1.2%。海峡时报指数目前略低于3,105点的高位，尽管预计周二将反弹。</blockquote></p><p> The global forecast for the Asian&nbsp;marketsis optimistic on easing fears regarding the Omicron variant of the coronavirus. The European markets were mixed and the U.S. bourses were up and the Asian markets figure to split the difference.</p><p><blockquote>对亚洲市场的全球预测对缓解对冠状病毒奥密克戎变种的担忧持乐观态度。欧洲市场涨跌互现，美国股市上涨，亚洲市场似乎分担了这一差异。</blockquote></p><p> The STI finished slightly lower on Monday following losses from the financials, gains from the properties and a mixed picture from the industrials.</p><p><blockquote>继金融股下跌、房地产股上涨以及工业股涨跌互现后，海指周一小幅收低。</blockquote></p><p> For the day, the index fell 4.04 points or 0.13 percent to finish at 3,104.24 after trading between 3,104.24 and 3,113.55. Volume was 863.6 million shares worth 394.2 million Singapore dollars. There were 190 gainers and 139 decliners.</p><p><blockquote>当天，该指数在3,104.24点至3,113.55点之间交易后，下跌4.04点或0.13%，收于3,104.24点。成交量为8.636亿股，价值3.942亿新元。上涨190家，下跌139家。</blockquote></p><p> Among the actives, Ascendas REIT and DBS Group both fell 0.34 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust and Mapletree Commercial Trust both climbed 0.50 percent, City Developments rallied 0.60 percent, Comfort DelGro advanced 0.73 percent, Dairy Farm International surged 2.56 percent, Genting Singapore jumped 0.65 percent, Keppel Corp and Hongkong Land both dropped 0.58 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation eased 0.18 percent, SATS rose 0.26 percent, Singapore Exchange spiked 0.98 percent, Singapore Press Holdings added 0.43 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering shed 0.53 percent, Thai Beverage accelerated 0.76 percent, United Overseas Bank sank 0.60 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.49 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding soared 1.54 percent and Mapletree Logistics Trust, SembCorp Industries, Singapore Airlines and SingTel were unchanged.</p><p><blockquote>活跃股中，腾飞房地产投资信托基金和星展集团均下跌0.34%，凯德综合商业信托和丰树商业信托均上涨0.50%，City Developments上涨0.60%，Comfort DelGro上涨0.73%，Dairy Farm International飙升2.56%，云顶新加坡上涨0.65%，吉宝企业和香港置地均下跌0.58%，华侨银行下跌0.18%，SATS上涨0.26%，新加坡交易所飙升0.98%，新加坡科技工程下跌0.53%，大华银行下跌0.60%，丰益国际下跌0.49%，扬子江造船飙升1.54%，丰树物流信托、胜科工业、新加坡航空和新加坡电信持平。</blockquote></p><p> The lead from Wall Street is solid as the major averages opened higher on Monday and accelerated as the day progressed, ending at or near record closing highs.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街的领先优势稳固，主要股指周一开盘走高，并随着时间的推移加速上涨，收于或接近历史收盘高点。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow spiked 351.82 points or 0.98 percent to finish at 36,302.38, while the NASDAQ surged 217.89 points or 1.39 percent to end at 15,871.26 and the S&amp;P 500 gained 65.40 points or 1.38 percent to close at 4,791.19.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数飙升351.82点，涨幅0.98%，收于36,302.38点；纳斯达克飙升217.89点，涨幅1.39%，收于15,871.26点；标普500上涨65.40点，涨幅1.38%，收于4,791.19点。</blockquote></p><p> The continued strength on Wall Street came amid easing concerns about the economic impact of the Omicron variant of the&nbsp;coronavirus. While Omicron seems to be more transmissible, the new strain purportedly causes milder symptoms and could accelerate the end of the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街持续走强之际，人们对冠状病毒奥密克戎变种对经济影响的担忧有所缓解。虽然奥密克戎病毒似乎更具传染性，但据称这种新毒株会引起较轻的症状，并可能加速大流行的结束。</blockquote></p><p> Stocks may also have benefitted from so-called window-dressing going into the end of the year, with traders looking to boost the value of the portfolios.</p><p><blockquote>随着交易员希望提高投资组合的价值，股市也可能受益于年底所谓的门面装饰。</blockquote></p><p> Crude oil futures ended sharply higher Monday amid hopes the Omicron variant will not any significantly impact global economic recovery. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for February ended up by $1.78 or 2.4 percent at $75.57 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>由于希望奥密克戎变种不会对全球经济复苏产生任何重大影响，原油期货周一大幅收高。西德克萨斯中质原油2月期货收涨1.78美元或2.4%，报每桶75.57美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3251627/singapore-bourse-likely-to-bounce-higher-again-on-tuesday.aspx?type=acom\">RTTNews</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3251627/singapore-bourse-likely-to-bounce-higher-again-on-tuesday.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127506895","content_text":"The Singapore stock market on Monday snapped the four-day winning streak in which it had gathered almost 35 points or 1.2 percent. The Straits Times Index now sits just beneath the 3,105-point plateau although it's expected to rebound on Tuesday.\nThe global forecast for the Asian marketsis optimistic on easing fears regarding the Omicron variant of the coronavirus. The European markets were mixed and the U.S. bourses were up and the Asian markets figure to split the difference.\nThe STI finished slightly lower on Monday following losses from the financials, gains from the properties and a mixed picture from the industrials.\nFor the day, the index fell 4.04 points or 0.13 percent to finish at 3,104.24 after trading between 3,104.24 and 3,113.55. Volume was 863.6 million shares worth 394.2 million Singapore dollars. There were 190 gainers and 139 decliners.\nAmong the actives, Ascendas REIT and DBS Group both fell 0.34 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust and Mapletree Commercial Trust both climbed 0.50 percent, City Developments rallied 0.60 percent, Comfort DelGro advanced 0.73 percent, Dairy Farm International surged 2.56 percent, Genting Singapore jumped 0.65 percent, Keppel Corp and Hongkong Land both dropped 0.58 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation eased 0.18 percent, SATS rose 0.26 percent, Singapore Exchange spiked 0.98 percent, Singapore Press Holdings added 0.43 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering shed 0.53 percent, Thai Beverage accelerated 0.76 percent, United Overseas Bank sank 0.60 percent, Wilmar International lost 0.49 percent, Yangzijiang Shipbuilding soared 1.54 percent and Mapletree Logistics Trust, SembCorp Industries, Singapore Airlines and SingTel were unchanged.\nThe lead from Wall Street is solid as the major averages opened higher on Monday and accelerated as the day progressed, ending at or near record closing highs.\nThe Dow spiked 351.82 points or 0.98 percent to finish at 36,302.38, while the NASDAQ surged 217.89 points or 1.39 percent to end at 15,871.26 and the S&P 500 gained 65.40 points or 1.38 percent to close at 4,791.19.\nThe continued strength on Wall Street came amid easing concerns about the economic impact of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus. While Omicron seems to be more transmissible, the new strain purportedly causes milder symptoms and could accelerate the end of the pandemic.\nStocks may also have benefitted from so-called window-dressing going into the end of the year, with traders looking to boost the value of the portfolios.\nCrude oil futures ended sharply higher Monday amid hopes the Omicron variant will not any significantly impact global economic recovery. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for February ended up by $1.78 or 2.4 percent at $75.57 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":693,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696001282,"gmtCreate":1640568306832,"gmtModify":1640568307124,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"up","listText":"up","text":"up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696001282","repostId":"2194177239","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2194177239","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640559609,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2194177239?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-27 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2194177239","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.The S&P 500  is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.According to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any ","content":"<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"yahoofinance_au","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Santa Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSanta Claus Rally watch: What to know this week<blockquote>圣诞老人集会观察：本周需要了解什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Yahoo Finance</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-27 07:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for ...</p><p><blockquote><div>随着交易员从假期缩短的一周中回归，进入新的一年的价格走势将受到密切关注——特别是考虑到相对清淡的经济数据和收益日历...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html\">Yahoo Finance</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4541":"氢能源","FCEL":"燃料电池能源","BK4096":"电气部件与设备","SPY.AU":"SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/santa-claus-rally-watch-what-to-know-this-week-142909627.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2194177239","content_text":"As traders return from the holiday-shortened week, the price action heading into the new year will be closely monitored — especially given the relatively light economic data and earnings calendar for the coming days.\nThe S&P 500 (^GSPC) is entering the period known for ushering in the so-called Santa Claus Rally, or seasonally strong timeframe for stocks at the end of each year.\nThe term, coined by Stock Trader's Almanac in the 1970s, encompasses the final five trading days of the year and first two sessions of the new year. This year, that Santa Claus Rally window is set to start on Monday, Dec. 27 — or the latest a Santa Claus rally has started in 11 years, due to the timing of the holidays this year.\nAccording to data from LPL Financial, the Santa Claus Rally period encapsulates the seven days most likely to be higher in any given year. Since 1950, the Santa Claus Rally period has produced a positive return for the S&P 500 78.9% of the time, with an average return of 1.33%.\n“Why are these seven days so strong?” wrote Ryan Detrick, LPL Financial chief market strategist, in a note. “Whether optimism over a coming new year, holiday spending, traders on vacation, institutions squaring up their books — or the holiday spirit — the bottom line is that bulls tend to believe in Santa.”\nAnd if history is any indication, the absence of a Santa Claus Rally has also typically served as a harbinger of lower near-term returns.\n\"Going back to the mid-1990s, there have been only six times Santa failed to show in December. January was lower five of those six times, and the full year had a solid gain only once (in 2016, but a mini-bear market early in the year),\" Detrick added.\n“Considering the bear markets of 2000 and 2008 both took place after one of the rare instances that Santa failed to show makes believers out of us,\" he said. A bear market typically refers to when stocks drop at least 20% from recent record highs. \"Should this seasonally strong period miss the mark, it could be a warning sign.\"\nAnd this year, investors do have considerable additional concerns to mull heading into the new year. Though stocks closed out Thursday's session at fresh record highs before the long holiday weekend, December still marked a volatile month to start, with renewed concerns over the Omicron variant and the potential for tighter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve weighing on risk assets. Plus, prospects for more near-term fiscal support via the Biden administration's Build Back Better bill have dwindled, and inflation concerns spiked further. Last week, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) — the Fed's preferred inflation gauge — rose at a 4.7% year-over-year clip, or the fastest since 1983.\n\"If the U.S. was not battling the Omicron variant, U.S. stocks would be dancing higher as the Santa Claus Rally would have kept the climb going into uncharted territory,\" Edward Moya, chief market strategist at OANDA, wrote in a note last week. \"It is too early to say for sure if we will get a Santa Claus Rally, but given all the short-term risks of Fed tightening, Chinese weakness, fiscal support uncertainty and COVID, Wall Street is not complaining.\"\nA man in a Santa Claus costume gestures on the floor at the closing bell of the Dow Industrial Average at the New York Stock Exchange on December 5, 2019 in New York. (Photo by Bryan R. Smith / AFP) (Photo by BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images)BRYAN R. SMITH via Getty Images\nEconomic calendar\n\nMonday: Dallas Federal Reserve Manufacturing Activity Index, Dec. (13.0 expected, 11.8 in November)\nTuesday: FHFA House Price Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, month-over-month, October (0.9% expected, 0.96% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Index, year-over-year, October (18.6%. expected, 19.05% in September); S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index, year-over-year, November (19.51% in October); Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index, December (11 expected,11 in November)\nWednesday: Wholesale Inventories, month-over-month, November preliminary (1.7% expected, 2.3% in October); Advance Goods Trade Balance, November (-$89.0 billion expected, -$82.9 billion in October); Retail Inventories, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 0.1% in October); Pending Home Sales, month-over-month, November (0.5% expected, 7.5% in October)\nThursday: Initial jobless claims, week ended Dec. 25. (205,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended Dec. 18 (1.859 million during prior week); MNI Chicago PMI, December (62.2 expected, 61.8 in November)\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release\n\nEarnings calendar\n\nMonday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nTuesday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nWednesday: FuelCell Energy Inc. (FCEL) before market open\nThursday: No notable reports scheduled for release\nFriday: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FCEL":0.9,"SPY.AU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":943,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698795738,"gmtCreate":1640529472376,"gmtModify":1640529472716,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"okie","listText":"okie","text":"okie","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698795738","repostId":"2193033173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":929,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698298649,"gmtCreate":1640399202792,"gmtModify":1640399203083,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like","listText":"like","text":"like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698298649","repostId":"1156159690","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1049,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":801852996,"gmtCreate":1627511574815,"gmtModify":1633764400892,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"pls like&nbsp;","listText":"pls like&nbsp;","text":"pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801852996","repostId":"2154721924","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154721924","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627486574,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2154721924?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-28 23:36","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today<blockquote>为什么AMD的股票今天走高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154721924","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expecte","content":"<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p><p><blockquote>AMD周二晚间公布了好于预期的第二季度财务业绩，并发布了高于预期的第三季度指引，周三上午该公司股价走高。</blockquote></p><p> AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMD公布季度收益为每股63美分，超出预期的每股54美分。该公司公布季度营收为38.5亿美元，超出预期的36.2亿美元。AMD表示，预计第三季度营收将在40亿至42亿美元之间，高于预期的38.2亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p><p><blockquote>AMD总裁兼首席执行官Lisa Su表示：“我们的业务在第二季度表现异常出色，收入和营业利润率同比翻了一番，盈利能力同比增长了两倍多。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p><p><blockquote><b>分析员评估：</b>Rosenblatt分析师Hans Mosesmann维持AMD买入评级，并将目标价从135美元上调至150美元。</blockquote></p><p> Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p><p><blockquote>Susquehanna分析师Christopher Rolland维持AMD正面评级，并将目标价从125美元上调至130美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>AMD在52周内的交易价格最高为99.23美元，最低为67.02美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p><p><blockquote>截至周三最后一次检查，该股上涨5%，至95.6美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today<blockquote>为什么AMD的股票今天走高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today<blockquote>为什么AMD的股票今天走高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-28 23:36</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p><p><blockquote>AMD周二晚间公布了好于预期的第二季度财务业绩，并发布了高于预期的第三季度指引，周三上午该公司股价走高。</blockquote></p><p> AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMD公布季度收益为每股63美分，超出预期的每股54美分。该公司公布季度营收为38.5亿美元，超出预期的36.2亿美元。AMD表示，预计第三季度营收将在40亿至42亿美元之间，高于预期的38.2亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> \"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p><p><blockquote>AMD总裁兼首席执行官Lisa Su表示：“我们的业务在第二季度表现异常出色，收入和营业利润率同比翻了一番，盈利能力同比增长了两倍多。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p><p><blockquote><b>分析员评估：</b>Rosenblatt分析师Hans Mosesmann维持AMD买入评级，并将目标价从135美元上调至150美元。</blockquote></p><p> Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p><p><blockquote>Susquehanna分析师Christopher Rolland维持AMD正面评级，并将目标价从125美元上调至130美元。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>AMD在52周内的交易价格最高为99.23美元，最低为67.02美元。</blockquote></p><p> At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p><p><blockquote>截至周三最后一次检查，该股上涨5%，至95.6美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154721924","content_text":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.\nAMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.\n\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su, president and CEO of AMD.\nAnalyst Assessment: Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained AMD with a Buy rating and raised the price target from $135 to $150.\nSusquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained AMD with a Positive rating and raised the price target from $125 to $130.\nPrice Action: AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":844483674,"gmtCreate":1636451510021,"gmtModify":1636452238441,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"up and up","listText":"up and up","text":"up and up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/844483674","repostId":"1156902045","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156902045","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1636450697,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1156902045?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-09 17:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading<blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156902045","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"NVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading.Nvidia Corp(NVDA.O)on Tuesday released a set of","content":"<p>NVIDIA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;rose&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;3%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3452308afdc1d32ccb3ff6fab118f8a0\" tg-width=\"881\" tg-height=\"602\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Nvidia Corp(NVDA.O)on Tuesday released a set of tools for software developers aimed at helping them create a \"metaverse\" of three-dimensional virtual worlds - and use a lot more computing power from Nvidia's chips in the process.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%。英伟达公司（NVDA.O）周二为软件开发人员发布了一套工具，旨在帮助他们创建三维虚拟世界的“元宇宙”，并在此过程中使用英伟达芯片的更多计算能力。</blockquote></p><p> At the Santa Clara, California, company's annual technology conference, Nvidia released Omniverse Enterprise, which will start at $9,000 per year and be sold by partners such as Dell Technologies(DELL.N)and Lenovo Group Ltd(0992.HK), which build powerful computing systems with Nvidia chips for corporate customers.</p><p><blockquote>在加州圣克拉拉举行的公司年度技术会议上，英伟达发布了Omniverse Enterprise，该产品的起价为每年9000美元，由戴尔科技（DELL.N）和联想集团有限公司（0992.HK）等合作伙伴销售，这些公司为企业客户构建采用英伟达芯片的强大计算系统。</blockquote></p><p> The Omniverse tools help various apps used to create three-dimensional worlds, such as software from Adobe Inc(ADBE.O), work better together while running on chips made by Nvidia.</p><p><blockquote>Omniverse工具帮助用于创建三维世界的各种应用程序，例如Adobe Inc(ADBE)的软件。O)，在Nvidia制造的芯片上运行时更好地协同工作。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading<blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading<blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-09 17:38</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NVIDIA&nbsp;shares&nbsp;rose&nbsp;more&nbsp;than&nbsp;3%&nbsp;in&nbsp;premarket&nbsp;trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3452308afdc1d32ccb3ff6fab118f8a0\" tg-width=\"881\" tg-height=\"602\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Nvidia Corp(NVDA.O)on Tuesday released a set of tools for software developers aimed at helping them create a \"metaverse\" of three-dimensional virtual worlds - and use a lot more computing power from Nvidia's chips in the process.</p><p><blockquote>英伟达股价在盘前交易中上涨超过3%。英伟达公司（NVDA.O）周二为软件开发人员发布了一套工具，旨在帮助他们创建三维虚拟世界的“元宇宙”，并在此过程中使用英伟达芯片的更多计算能力。</blockquote></p><p> At the Santa Clara, California, company's annual technology conference, Nvidia released Omniverse Enterprise, which will start at $9,000 per year and be sold by partners such as Dell Technologies(DELL.N)and Lenovo Group Ltd(0992.HK), which build powerful computing systems with Nvidia chips for corporate customers.</p><p><blockquote>在加州圣克拉拉举行的公司年度技术会议上，英伟达发布了Omniverse Enterprise，该产品的起价为每年9000美元，由戴尔科技（DELL.N）和联想集团有限公司（0992.HK）等合作伙伴销售，这些公司为企业客户构建采用英伟达芯片的强大计算系统。</blockquote></p><p> The Omniverse tools help various apps used to create three-dimensional worlds, such as software from Adobe Inc(ADBE.O), work better together while running on chips made by Nvidia.</p><p><blockquote>Omniverse工具帮助用于创建三维世界的各种应用程序，例如Adobe Inc(ADBE)的软件。O)，在Nvidia制造的芯片上运行时更好地协同工作。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156902045","content_text":"NVIDIA shares rose more than 3% in premarket trading.Nvidia Corp(NVDA.O)on Tuesday released a set of tools for software developers aimed at helping them create a \"metaverse\" of three-dimensional virtual worlds - and use a lot more computing power from Nvidia's chips in the process.\nAt the Santa Clara, California, company's annual technology conference, Nvidia released Omniverse Enterprise, which will start at $9,000 per year and be sold by partners such as Dell Technologies(DELL.N)and Lenovo Group Ltd(0992.HK), which build powerful computing systems with Nvidia chips for corporate customers.\nThe Omniverse tools help various apps used to create three-dimensional worlds, such as software from Adobe Inc(ADBE.O), work better together while running on chips made by Nvidia.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":843318584,"gmtCreate":1635808241168,"gmtModify":1635808241319,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"great","listText":"great","text":"great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843318584","repostId":"1175678891","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175678891","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635779942,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1175678891?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-01 23:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175678891","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the","content":"<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在第三财季财报日令人失望，但该股的抛售并没有持续太久。这是苹果公司股价早在周五就反弹的最有可能的原因。</blockquote></p><p> On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results&nbsp;that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>10月28日，苹果公布的第四财季业绩多年来首次落后于市场普遍预期。尽管大多数公司认为收入增长了29%，非常稳健，但苹果股票在盘后交易中遭到抛售，在财报看涨期权之前市值损失了高达1250亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到周五收盘时，苹果公司已经抹去了大部分短暂的损失。这位苹果专家认为，盘中复苏主要是由分析师发布的报告推动的，这些报告听起来远没有最初暗示的那么悲观。</blockquote></p><p> Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我们回顾一下华尔街专家对苹果盈利的一些主要看法。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：纽约州纽约市的苹果商店。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>华尔街似乎很舒服</b></blockquote></p><p> TipRanks&nbsp;reported&nbsp;on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p><p><blockquote>TipRanks报告了13位在苹果上发表盈利评论的分析师。其中，没有人改变对苹果公司股票的评级，该评级仍为“适度买入”：大约四分之三的人仍然建议购买该股票。</blockquote></p><p> The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>来自Wedbush的传统乐观分析师Dan Ives认为没有理由担心苹果及其业务。他称这家库比蒂诺公司的供应链问题是“短期内令人痛苦的噪音”，并仍然相信对苹果产品和服务的强劲需求应该会转化为2022年的销售延迟。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She&nbsp;lowered&nbsp;her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利的凯蒂·休伯蒂（Katy Huberty）是另一位直言不讳的多头，我喜欢关注她富有洞察力的观点和分析。她将AAPL股票的目标价下调了2美元，至164美元，但仍指出未来仍有10%左右的上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师表示，“供应限制将成为苹果9月份季度收益报告后的头条新闻”，这可能会暂时抑制估值和股价。但她发表了另外两条听起来更加乐观的评论：（1）指导评论意味着第一财季收入应该符合共识，以及（2）更重要的故事是服务业和大中华区令人印象深刻的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p><p><blockquote>即使是不那么乐观的分析师似乎也不太担心苹果。伯恩斯坦的托尼·萨科纳吉(Tony Sacconaghi)对该股给予中性评级，并认为下行风险超过10%。尽管如此，尽管面临挑战，这位专家似乎还是对第一财季6%至9%的稳健增长和高于预期的毛利率表示认可。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果·梅文的看法</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经习惯于看到苹果在过去几年中实现令人印象深刻的盈利超出预期，在COVID-19危机期间更是如此。出于这个原因，最近的收入失误一定感觉就像在冰冷的水中浸泡一样。</blockquote></p><p> But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p><p><blockquote>但在幕后，苹果最近的表现仍然令人印象深刻。尽管存在所有供应链问题，但收入仍增长了29%，尽管与2020年相比较轻松。毛利率大幅增长，运营费用保持可控。如果不是投资者不太关心的线下项目的拖累，苹果的每股收益可能会再次增长。</blockquote></p><p> I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到该公司管理团队最近的表现，我仍然发现很难证明对苹果的看跌是合理的。看起来市场已经同意我的观点，即使周五花了几个小时才下定决心。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Disappointed -- and Quickly Rebounded. Here's Why.<blockquote>苹果很失望，但很快就反弹了。原因如下。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-01 23:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在第三财季财报日令人失望，但该股的抛售并没有持续太久。这是苹果公司股价早在周五就反弹的最有可能的原因。</blockquote></p><p> On October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results&nbsp;that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.</p><p><blockquote>10月28日，苹果公布的第四财季业绩多年来首次落后于市场普遍预期。尽管大多数公司认为收入增长了29%，非常稳健，但苹果股票在盘后交易中遭到抛售，在财报看涨期权之前市值损失了高达1250亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Yet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.</p><p><blockquote>然而，到周五收盘时，苹果公司已经抹去了大部分短暂的损失。这位苹果专家认为，盘中复苏主要是由分析师发布的报告推动的，这些报告听起来远没有最初暗示的那么悲观。</blockquote></p><p> Below, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.</p><p><blockquote>下面，我们回顾一下华尔街专家对苹果盈利的一些主要看法。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3facec59ae76a6c28f4c5847600b4de\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"886\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：纽约州纽约市的苹果商店。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Wall Street seemed comfortable</b></p><p><blockquote><b>华尔街似乎很舒服</b></blockquote></p><p> TipRanks&nbsp;reported&nbsp;on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.</p><p><blockquote>TipRanks报告了13位在苹果上发表盈利评论的分析师。其中，没有人改变对苹果公司股票的评级，该评级仍为“适度买入”：大约四分之三的人仍然建议购买该股票。</blockquote></p><p> The traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.</p><p><blockquote>来自Wedbush的传统乐观分析师Dan Ives认为没有理由担心苹果及其业务。他称这家库比蒂诺公司的供应链问题是“短期内令人痛苦的噪音”，并仍然相信对苹果产品和服务的强劲需求应该会转化为2022年的销售延迟。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She&nbsp;lowered&nbsp;her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利的凯蒂·休伯蒂（Katy Huberty）是另一位直言不讳的多头，我喜欢关注她富有洞察力的观点和分析。她将AAPL股票的目标价下调了2美元，至164美元，但仍指出未来仍有10%左右的上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> According to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师表示，“供应限制将成为苹果9月份季度收益报告后的头条新闻”，这可能会暂时抑制估值和股价。但她发表了另外两条听起来更加乐观的评论：（1）指导评论意味着第一财季收入应该符合共识，以及（2）更重要的故事是服务业和大中华区令人印象深刻的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Even the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.</p><p><blockquote>即使是不那么乐观的分析师似乎也不太担心苹果。伯恩斯坦的托尼·萨科纳吉(Tony Sacconaghi)对该股给予中性评级，并认为下行风险超过10%。尽管如此，尽管面临挑战，这位专家似乎还是对第一财季6%至9%的稳健增长和高于预期的毛利率表示认可。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Apple Maven’s take</b></p><p><blockquote><b>苹果·梅文的看法</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.</p><p><blockquote>投资者已经习惯于看到苹果在过去几年中实现令人印象深刻的盈利超出预期，在COVID-19危机期间更是如此。出于这个原因，最近的收入失误一定感觉就像在冰冷的水中浸泡一样。</blockquote></p><p> But under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.</p><p><blockquote>但在幕后，苹果最近的表现仍然令人印象深刻。尽管存在所有供应链问题，但收入仍增长了29%，尽管与2020年相比较轻松。毛利率大幅增长，运营费用保持可控。如果不是投资者不太关心的线下项目的拖累，苹果的每股收益可能会再次增长。</blockquote></p><p> I still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到该公司管理团队最近的表现，我仍然发现很难证明对苹果的看跌是合理的。看起来市场已经同意我的观点，即使周五花了几个小时才下定决心。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/this-is-why-apple-stock-rebounded-after-earnings","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175678891","content_text":"Apple disappointed on fiscal Q3 earnings day, but the stock’s selloff did not last long. Here is the most likely reason why AAPL shares rebounded as early as Friday.\nOn October 28,Apple delivered fiscal Q4 results that lagged consensus for the first time in years. Despite revenue growth of 29% that most companies would find very solid, Apple stocksold off in after-hours action, losing as much as $125 billion in market cap right before the earnings call.\nYet, by the end of day Friday, AAPL had erased the bulk of its short-lived losses. The Apple Maven thinks that the intraday recovery was driven primarily by analysts publishing reports that sounded much less bearish than the revenue miss may have implied at first.\nBelow, we review some of the main takeaways from Wall Street experts on Apple’s earnings.\nFigure 1: Apple store in New York, NY.\nWall Street seemed comfortable\nTipRanks reported on 13 analysts that published earnings reviews on Apple. Among these, none changed the rating on AAPL stock, which remains a “moderate buy”: about three-fourths still recommend buying the shares.\nThe traditionally optimistic analyst from Wedbush, Dan Ives, did notseereasons to worry about Apple and its business. He called the Cupertino company’s supply chain issues “painful noise in the near term” and remained confident that strong demand for Apple’s products and services should convert to delayed sales in 2022.\nMorgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty is another vocal bull that I like to track for her insightful opinions and analysis. She lowered her price target on AAPL stock by a meager $2 to $164, while still pointing at around 10% gain potential from here.\nAccording to the analyst, “supply constraints will dominate the headlines post Apple's September quarter earnings report”, which could put a damper on valuations and share price for a moment. But she made two other comments that sounded much more upbeat: (1) guidance commentary implies that fiscal Q1 revenue should be in line with consensus, and (2) the more important stories are impressive growth in services and Greater China segments.\nEven the much less bullish analysts did notseemtoo worried about Apple. Bernstein’s Tony Sacconaghi has a neutral rating on the stock and sees downside risk of over 10%. Still, the expert seemed to nod at solid fiscal Q1 guided growth of 6% to 9% and higher-than-expected gross margin, despite the challenges.\nApple Maven’s take\nInvestors had become accustomed to seeing Apple deliver impressive earnings beats in the past few years, even more so during the COVID-19 crisis. For this reason, the most recent revenue miss must have felt like a dip in ice-cold water.\nBut under the hood, Apple’s recent performance has remained impressive. Despite all the supply chain issues, revenues still climbed 29%, albeit over easy 2020 comps. Gross margin increased substantially, and operating expenses remained under check. If not for some drag from below-the-line items that investors care little about, Apple would have delivered another EPS beat.\nI still find it hard to justify bearishness towards Apple, considering how well the company’s management team has been executing lately. It looks like the market has agreed with me, even if it took it a few hours on Friday to make up its mind.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603451424,"gmtCreate":1638443991996,"gmtModify":1638443992103,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603451424","repostId":"1107545461","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107545461","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638422200,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107545461?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-02 13:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Grab debuts on Nasdaq, marking biggest Southeast Asia listing<blockquote>Grab在纳斯达克首次亮相，成为东南亚最大的上市公司</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107545461","media":"Reuters","summary":"$Grab$, Southeast Asia's biggest ride-hailing and food delivery firm,lists on Nasdaq on Thursday following its $40 billion merger with special-purpose acquisition company  $Altimeter Growth Corp$.The deal is the world's biggest ever by a blank-check company and the biggest U.S. listing by a Southeast Asian firm.Founded in 2012, Grab is Southeast Asia's largest startup, valued at just over $16 billion last year. It launched as a Malaysian taxi-hailing service and now calls itself a \"superapp\" aft","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRAB\">Grab</a>, Southeast Asia's biggest ride-hailing and food delivery firm,lists&nbsp;on Nasdaq on Thursday following its $40 billion merger with special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AGC\">Altimeter Growth Corp</a>.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRAB\">抓住</a>东南亚最大的网约车和食品配送公司在以400亿美元与特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并后于周四在纳斯达克上市<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AGC\">高度计增长公司</a>.</blockquote></p><p> The deal is the world's biggest ever by a blank-check company and the biggest U.S. listing by a Southeast Asian firm.</p><p><blockquote>这笔交易是全球有史以来最大的空白支票公司交易，也是东南亚公司在美国最大的上市交易。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHAT IS GRAB?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>什么是GRAB？</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2012, Grab is Southeast Asia's largest startup, valued at just over $16 billion last year. It launched as a Malaysian taxi-hailing service and now calls itself a \"superapp\" after expanding into food, grocery and parcel delivery and to digital payments, lending and other financial services.</p><p><blockquote>Grab成立于2012年，是东南亚最大的初创公司，去年估值略高于160亿美元。它最初是马来西亚的出租车服务，现在评级本身已经成为一个“超级应用程序”，后来扩展到食品、杂货和包裹递送以及数字支付、贷款和其他金融服务。</blockquote></p><p> Singapore-headquartered Grab operates across 465 cities in eight countries in the region, counting Indonesia as its biggest. Its venture with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd(STEL.SI)was awarded a digital bank license in Singapore last year.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于新加坡的Grab在该地区8个国家的465个城市开展业务，其中印度尼西亚是最大的城市。其与新加坡电信有限公司（STEL.SI）的合资企业去年在新加坡获得了数字银行牌照。</blockquote></p><p> Grab gained the global spotlight in 2018 when it bought the Southeast Asian business of Uber Technologies Inc(UBER.N)in return for the U.S. ride-hailing company taking a stake in Grab.</p><p><blockquote>Grab在2018年收购了Uber Technologies Inc(UBER.N)的东南亚业务，成为全球关注的焦点，以换取美国网约车公司入股Grab。</blockquote></p><p> With some 8,000 employees, Grab has tech centres in Singapore, Beijing, Seattle, Bengaluru and other places.</p><p><blockquote>Grab拥有约8000名员工，在新加坡、北京、西雅图、孟加拉鲁鲁等地设有技术中心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO'S BACKING GRAB? </b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织的后盾？</b></blockquote></p><p> Early investors include Japan's SoftBank, China's Didi Chuxing and venture capital firms Vertex Ventures Holdings and GGV Capital.</p><p><blockquote>早期投资者包括日本软银、中国滴滴出行以及风险投资公司Vertex Ventures Holdings和GGV Capital。</blockquote></p><p> Grab raised about $12 billion ahead of the listing. Investors range from venture and hedge funds to automobile companies and other ride-hailing firms, and include:</p><p><blockquote>Grab在上市前筹集了约120亿美元。投资者范围从风险投资和对冲基金到汽车公司和其他网约车公司，包括：</blockquote></p><p> Uber, Booking Holdings Inc, China Investment Corp, Coatue Management, Hillhouse Capital, Hyundai Motor Co, Invesco Ltd, Microsoft Corp, Ping An Capital Co, Toyota Motor Corp, and Yamaha Motor Co..</p><p><blockquote>优步、Booking Holdings Inc、中国投资公司、Coatue Management、高瓴资本、现代汽车公司、景顺有限公司、微软公司、平安资本公司、丰田汽车公司和雅马哈汽车公司..</blockquote></p><p> In the SPAC deal, about three dozen investors came on board including Temasek Holdings, BlackRock, Fidelity International, Abu Dhabi's Mubadala and Malaysia's Permodalan Nasional Bhd and Altimeter Capital.</p><p><blockquote>在SPAC交易中，大约有三打投资者加入，包括淡马锡控股、贝莱德、富达国际、阿布扎比的穆巴达拉、马来西亚的Permodalan Nasional Bhd和Altimeter Capital。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO'S THE COMPETITION? </b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织是竞争对手？</b></blockquote></p><p> GoTo Group, formed by the merger of Indonesian ride-hailing and deliveries firm Gojek and local e-commerce leader Tokopedia is Grab's biggest competitor.</p><p><blockquote>GoTo Group由印度尼西亚叫车和送货公司Gojek和当地电子商务领导者Tokopedia合并而成，是Grab最大的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> Singapore-based Sea Ltd, which has e-commerce, gaming and a digital payments business, and is also muscling into food delivery and financial services in Indonesia. Sea has also won a digital bank license in Singapore.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于新加坡的Sea Ltd拥有电子商务、游戏和数字支付业务，还在印度尼西亚大力进军食品配送和金融服务领域。Sea还获得了新加坡的数字银行牌照。</blockquote></p><p> Grab is likely to increasingly start competing with banks as it expands its financial services.</p><p><blockquote>随着Grab扩大其金融服务，它可能会越来越多地开始与银行竞争。</blockquote></p><p> It also competes with such delivery companies as Foodpanda and Deliveroo PLC.</p><p><blockquote>它还与Foodpanda和户户送等快递公司竞争。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHAT ARE GRAB'S FINANCIALS?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>GRAB的财务状况如何？</b></blockquote></p><p> Grab's third-quarter revenue fell 9% from a year earlier to $157 million. Its adjusted loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) widened 66% to $212 million. Gross merchandise value hit a quarterly record of $4 billion.</p><p><blockquote>Grab第三季度营收同比下降9%至1.57亿美元。其调整后的息税折旧摊销前亏损(EBITDA)扩大66%至2.12亿美元。商品总值创下40亿美元的季度纪录。</blockquote></p><p> The delivery business has emerged as the biggest segment as more consumers shifted to online food delivery during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>随着越来越多的消费者在疫情期间转向在线食品配送，配送业务已成为最大的细分市场。</blockquote></p><p> Grab forecasts it will turn profitable on an EBITDA basis in 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Grab预测其将于2023年在EBITDA基础上实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO ARE ITS KEY EXECUTIVES?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织是其主要高管？</b></blockquote></p><p> Anthony Tan, 39, is the company's CEO and co-founder.</p><p><blockquote>39岁的Anthony Tan是该公司的首席执行官兼联合创始人。</blockquote></p><p> Fellow co-founder Tan Hooi Ling, 38, runs Grab's operations, including corporate strategy and technology.</p><p><blockquote>38岁的联合创始人Tan Hooi Ling负责Grab的运营，包括企业战略和技术。</blockquote></p><p> Both Tans, unrelated, met at Harvard Business School, where they conceived the idea of the ride-hailing company.</p><p><blockquote>这两个没有血缘关系的人在哈佛商学院相遇，在那里他们构思了这家叫车公司的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Grab's president, Ming Maa, is a prominent dealmaker from SoftBank, who joined the company in 2016.</p><p><blockquote>Grab总裁Ming Maa是软银的著名交易撮合者，于2016年加入该公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Here are some milestones for the Singapore-headquartered company:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>以下是这家总部位于新加坡的公司的一些里程碑：</b></blockquote></p><p> 2011: Anthony Tan and co-founder Tan Hooi Ling create Grab in a Harvard Business School venture competition plan</p><p><blockquote>2011年：Anthony Tan和联合创始人Tan Hooi Ling在哈佛商学院创业竞赛计划中创建Grab</blockquote></p><p> 2012: Launches as MyTeksi taxi booking service in Malaysia</p><p><blockquote>2012年：在马来西亚推出MyTeksi出租车预订服务</blockquote></p><p> 2013: Expands to the Philippines, Thailand, Singapore as GrabTaxi</p><p><blockquote>2013年：作为GrabTaxi扩展到菲律宾、泰国、新加坡</blockquote></p><p> April 2014: Announces Series A funding</p><p><blockquote>2014年4月：宣布A轮融资</blockquote></p><p> June 2014: Launches in Indonesia</p><p><blockquote>2014年6月：在印度尼西亚推出</blockquote></p><p> December 2014: Japan's SoftBank&nbsp;invests $250 million in a funding round</p><p><blockquote>2014年12月：日本软银在一轮融资中投资2.5亿美元</blockquote></p><p> August 2015: Becomes a unicorn after $350 million funding round</p><p><blockquote>2015年8月：3.5亿美元融资后成为独角兽</blockquote></p><p> December 2015: Announces a strategic partnership with other ride-hailing companies Ola, Didi, and Lyft that competed against Uber</p><p><blockquote>2015年12月：宣布与其他与Uber竞争的网约车公司Ola、滴滴和Lyft建立战略合作伙伴关系</blockquote></p><p> January 2016: Rebrands to Grab from GrabTaxi to reflect expanding services</p><p><blockquote>2016年1月：从GrabTaxi更名为Grab，以反映不断扩大的服务</blockquote></p><p> November 2017: Launches GrabPay payments service for third-party transactions</p><p><blockquote>2017年11月：推出GrabPay第三方交易支付服务</blockquote></p><p> March 2018: Announces acquisition of Uber's business in Southeast Asia through an all-share deal, Uber becomes a strategic shareholder</p><p><blockquote>2018年3月：宣布通过全股交易收购Uber东南亚业务，Uber成为战略股东</blockquote></p><p> May 2018: Pilots GrabFood delivery service</p><p><blockquote>2018年5月：试点GrabFood配送服务</blockquote></p><p> July 2018: Unveils \"superapp\" strategy that provides a range of services under one platform</p><p><blockquote>2018年7月：推出“superapp”战略，在一个平台下提供一系列服务</blockquote></p><p> March 2019: Reaches valuation of about $14 billion</p><p><blockquote>2019年3月：估值达到约140亿美元</blockquote></p><p> December 2020: Wins digital full bank license in Singapore in a partnership with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd</p><p><blockquote>2020年12月：与新加坡电信有限公司合作，在新加坡获得数字全面银行牌照</blockquote></p><p></p><p> April 2021: Agrees to list on Nasdaq through a merger with special-purpose acquisition company Altimeter Growth Corp&nbsp;securing a valuation of nearly $40 billion</p><p><blockquote>2021年4月：同意通过与特殊目的收购公司Altimeter Growth Corp合并在纳斯达克上市，估值近400亿美元</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Grab debuts on Nasdaq, marking biggest Southeast Asia listing<blockquote>Grab在纳斯达克首次亮相，成为东南亚最大的上市公司</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGrab debuts on Nasdaq, marking biggest Southeast Asia listing<blockquote>Grab在纳斯达克首次亮相，成为东南亚最大的上市公司</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-02 13:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRAB\">Grab</a>, Southeast Asia's biggest ride-hailing and food delivery firm,lists&nbsp;on Nasdaq on Thursday following its $40 billion merger with special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AGC\">Altimeter Growth Corp</a>.</p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRAB\">抓住</a>东南亚最大的网约车和食品配送公司在以400亿美元与特殊目的收购公司(SPAC)合并后于周四在纳斯达克上市<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AGC\">高度计增长公司</a>.</blockquote></p><p> The deal is the world's biggest ever by a blank-check company and the biggest U.S. listing by a Southeast Asian firm.</p><p><blockquote>这笔交易是全球有史以来最大的空白支票公司交易，也是东南亚公司在美国最大的上市交易。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHAT IS GRAB?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>什么是GRAB？</b></blockquote></p><p> Founded in 2012, Grab is Southeast Asia's largest startup, valued at just over $16 billion last year. It launched as a Malaysian taxi-hailing service and now calls itself a \"superapp\" after expanding into food, grocery and parcel delivery and to digital payments, lending and other financial services.</p><p><blockquote>Grab成立于2012年，是东南亚最大的初创公司，去年估值略高于160亿美元。它最初是马来西亚的出租车服务，现在评级本身已经成为一个“超级应用程序”，后来扩展到食品、杂货和包裹递送以及数字支付、贷款和其他金融服务。</blockquote></p><p> Singapore-headquartered Grab operates across 465 cities in eight countries in the region, counting Indonesia as its biggest. Its venture with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd(STEL.SI)was awarded a digital bank license in Singapore last year.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于新加坡的Grab在该地区8个国家的465个城市开展业务，其中印度尼西亚是最大的城市。其与新加坡电信有限公司（STEL.SI）的合资企业去年在新加坡获得了数字银行牌照。</blockquote></p><p> Grab gained the global spotlight in 2018 when it bought the Southeast Asian business of Uber Technologies Inc(UBER.N)in return for the U.S. ride-hailing company taking a stake in Grab.</p><p><blockquote>Grab在2018年收购了Uber Technologies Inc(UBER.N)的东南亚业务，成为全球关注的焦点，以换取美国网约车公司入股Grab。</blockquote></p><p> With some 8,000 employees, Grab has tech centres in Singapore, Beijing, Seattle, Bengaluru and other places.</p><p><blockquote>Grab拥有约8000名员工，在新加坡、北京、西雅图、孟加拉鲁鲁等地设有技术中心。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO'S BACKING GRAB? </b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织的后盾？</b></blockquote></p><p> Early investors include Japan's SoftBank, China's Didi Chuxing and venture capital firms Vertex Ventures Holdings and GGV Capital.</p><p><blockquote>早期投资者包括日本软银、中国滴滴出行以及风险投资公司Vertex Ventures Holdings和GGV Capital。</blockquote></p><p> Grab raised about $12 billion ahead of the listing. Investors range from venture and hedge funds to automobile companies and other ride-hailing firms, and include:</p><p><blockquote>Grab在上市前筹集了约120亿美元。投资者范围从风险投资和对冲基金到汽车公司和其他网约车公司，包括：</blockquote></p><p> Uber, Booking Holdings Inc, China Investment Corp, Coatue Management, Hillhouse Capital, Hyundai Motor Co, Invesco Ltd, Microsoft Corp, Ping An Capital Co, Toyota Motor Corp, and Yamaha Motor Co..</p><p><blockquote>优步、Booking Holdings Inc、中国投资公司、Coatue Management、高瓴资本、现代汽车公司、景顺有限公司、微软公司、平安资本公司、丰田汽车公司和雅马哈汽车公司..</blockquote></p><p> In the SPAC deal, about three dozen investors came on board including Temasek Holdings, BlackRock, Fidelity International, Abu Dhabi's Mubadala and Malaysia's Permodalan Nasional Bhd and Altimeter Capital.</p><p><blockquote>在SPAC交易中，大约有三打投资者加入，包括淡马锡控股、贝莱德、富达国际、阿布扎比的穆巴达拉、马来西亚的Permodalan Nasional Bhd和Altimeter Capital。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO'S THE COMPETITION? </b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织是竞争对手？</b></blockquote></p><p> GoTo Group, formed by the merger of Indonesian ride-hailing and deliveries firm Gojek and local e-commerce leader Tokopedia is Grab's biggest competitor.</p><p><blockquote>GoTo Group由印度尼西亚叫车和送货公司Gojek和当地电子商务领导者Tokopedia合并而成，是Grab最大的竞争对手。</blockquote></p><p> Singapore-based Sea Ltd, which has e-commerce, gaming and a digital payments business, and is also muscling into food delivery and financial services in Indonesia. Sea has also won a digital bank license in Singapore.</p><p><blockquote>总部位于新加坡的Sea Ltd拥有电子商务、游戏和数字支付业务，还在印度尼西亚大力进军食品配送和金融服务领域。Sea还获得了新加坡的数字银行牌照。</blockquote></p><p> Grab is likely to increasingly start competing with banks as it expands its financial services.</p><p><blockquote>随着Grab扩大其金融服务，它可能会越来越多地开始与银行竞争。</blockquote></p><p> It also competes with such delivery companies as Foodpanda and Deliveroo PLC.</p><p><blockquote>它还与Foodpanda和户户送等快递公司竞争。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHAT ARE GRAB'S FINANCIALS?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>GRAB的财务状况如何？</b></blockquote></p><p> Grab's third-quarter revenue fell 9% from a year earlier to $157 million. Its adjusted loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) widened 66% to $212 million. Gross merchandise value hit a quarterly record of $4 billion.</p><p><blockquote>Grab第三季度营收同比下降9%至1.57亿美元。其调整后的息税折旧摊销前亏损(EBITDA)扩大66%至2.12亿美元。商品总值创下40亿美元的季度纪录。</blockquote></p><p> The delivery business has emerged as the biggest segment as more consumers shifted to online food delivery during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>随着越来越多的消费者在疫情期间转向在线食品配送，配送业务已成为最大的细分市场。</blockquote></p><p> Grab forecasts it will turn profitable on an EBITDA basis in 2023.</p><p><blockquote>Grab预测其将于2023年在EBITDA基础上实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> <b>WHO ARE ITS KEY EXECUTIVES?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>世卫组织是其主要高管？</b></blockquote></p><p> Anthony Tan, 39, is the company's CEO and co-founder.</p><p><blockquote>39岁的Anthony Tan是该公司的首席执行官兼联合创始人。</blockquote></p><p> Fellow co-founder Tan Hooi Ling, 38, runs Grab's operations, including corporate strategy and technology.</p><p><blockquote>38岁的联合创始人Tan Hooi Ling负责Grab的运营，包括企业战略和技术。</blockquote></p><p> Both Tans, unrelated, met at Harvard Business School, where they conceived the idea of the ride-hailing company.</p><p><blockquote>这两个没有血缘关系的人在哈佛商学院相遇，在那里他们构思了这家叫车公司的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Grab's president, Ming Maa, is a prominent dealmaker from SoftBank, who joined the company in 2016.</p><p><blockquote>Grab总裁Ming Maa是软银的著名交易撮合者，于2016年加入该公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Here are some milestones for the Singapore-headquartered company:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>以下是这家总部位于新加坡的公司的一些里程碑：</b></blockquote></p><p> 2011: Anthony Tan and co-founder Tan Hooi Ling create Grab in a Harvard Business School venture competition plan</p><p><blockquote>2011年：Anthony Tan和联合创始人Tan Hooi Ling在哈佛商学院创业竞赛计划中创建Grab</blockquote></p><p> 2012: Launches as MyTeksi taxi booking service in Malaysia</p><p><blockquote>2012年：在马来西亚推出MyTeksi出租车预订服务</blockquote></p><p> 2013: Expands to the Philippines, Thailand, Singapore as GrabTaxi</p><p><blockquote>2013年：作为GrabTaxi扩展到菲律宾、泰国、新加坡</blockquote></p><p> April 2014: Announces Series A funding</p><p><blockquote>2014年4月：宣布A轮融资</blockquote></p><p> June 2014: Launches in Indonesia</p><p><blockquote>2014年6月：在印度尼西亚推出</blockquote></p><p> December 2014: Japan's SoftBank&nbsp;invests $250 million in a funding round</p><p><blockquote>2014年12月：日本软银在一轮融资中投资2.5亿美元</blockquote></p><p> August 2015: Becomes a unicorn after $350 million funding round</p><p><blockquote>2015年8月：3.5亿美元融资后成为独角兽</blockquote></p><p> December 2015: Announces a strategic partnership with other ride-hailing companies Ola, Didi, and Lyft that competed against Uber</p><p><blockquote>2015年12月：宣布与其他与Uber竞争的网约车公司Ola、滴滴和Lyft建立战略合作伙伴关系</blockquote></p><p> January 2016: Rebrands to Grab from GrabTaxi to reflect expanding services</p><p><blockquote>2016年1月：从GrabTaxi更名为Grab，以反映不断扩大的服务</blockquote></p><p> November 2017: Launches GrabPay payments service for third-party transactions</p><p><blockquote>2017年11月：推出GrabPay第三方交易支付服务</blockquote></p><p> March 2018: Announces acquisition of Uber's business in Southeast Asia through an all-share deal, Uber becomes a strategic shareholder</p><p><blockquote>2018年3月：宣布通过全股交易收购Uber东南亚业务，Uber成为战略股东</blockquote></p><p> May 2018: Pilots GrabFood delivery service</p><p><blockquote>2018年5月：试点GrabFood配送服务</blockquote></p><p> July 2018: Unveils \"superapp\" strategy that provides a range of services under one platform</p><p><blockquote>2018年7月：推出“superapp”战略，在一个平台下提供一系列服务</blockquote></p><p> March 2019: Reaches valuation of about $14 billion</p><p><blockquote>2019年3月：估值达到约140亿美元</blockquote></p><p> December 2020: Wins digital full bank license in Singapore in a partnership with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd</p><p><blockquote>2020年12月：与新加坡电信有限公司合作，在新加坡获得数字全面银行牌照</blockquote></p><p></p><p> April 2021: Agrees to list on Nasdaq through a merger with special-purpose acquisition company Altimeter Growth Corp&nbsp;securing a valuation of nearly $40 billion</p><p><blockquote>2021年4月：同意通过与特殊目的收购公司Altimeter Growth Corp合并在纳斯达克上市，估值近400亿美元</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/grab-debuts-nasdaq-marking-biggest-southeast-asia-listing-2021-12-02/\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GRAB":"Grab Holdings"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/grab-debuts-nasdaq-marking-biggest-southeast-asia-listing-2021-12-02/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107545461","content_text":"Grab, Southeast Asia's biggest ride-hailing and food delivery firm,lists on Nasdaq on Thursday following its $40 billion merger with special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Altimeter Growth Corp.\nThe deal is the world's biggest ever by a blank-check company and the biggest U.S. listing by a Southeast Asian firm.\nWHAT IS GRAB?\nFounded in 2012, Grab is Southeast Asia's largest startup, valued at just over $16 billion last year. It launched as a Malaysian taxi-hailing service and now calls itself a \"superapp\" after expanding into food, grocery and parcel delivery and to digital payments, lending and other financial services.\nSingapore-headquartered Grab operates across 465 cities in eight countries in the region, counting Indonesia as its biggest. Its venture with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd(STEL.SI)was awarded a digital bank license in Singapore last year.\nGrab gained the global spotlight in 2018 when it bought the Southeast Asian business of Uber Technologies Inc(UBER.N)in return for the U.S. ride-hailing company taking a stake in Grab.\nWith some 8,000 employees, Grab has tech centres in Singapore, Beijing, Seattle, Bengaluru and other places.\nWHO'S BACKING GRAB? \nEarly investors include Japan's SoftBank, China's Didi Chuxing and venture capital firms Vertex Ventures Holdings and GGV Capital.\nGrab raised about $12 billion ahead of the listing. Investors range from venture and hedge funds to automobile companies and other ride-hailing firms, and include:\nUber, Booking Holdings Inc, China Investment Corp, Coatue Management, Hillhouse Capital, Hyundai Motor Co, Invesco Ltd, Microsoft Corp, Ping An Capital Co, Toyota Motor Corp, and Yamaha Motor Co..\nIn the SPAC deal, about three dozen investors came on board including Temasek Holdings, BlackRock, Fidelity International, Abu Dhabi's Mubadala and Malaysia's Permodalan Nasional Bhd and Altimeter Capital.\nWHO'S THE COMPETITION? \nGoTo Group, formed by the merger of Indonesian ride-hailing and deliveries firm Gojek and local e-commerce leader Tokopedia is Grab's biggest competitor.\nSingapore-based Sea Ltd, which has e-commerce, gaming and a digital payments business, and is also muscling into food delivery and financial services in Indonesia. Sea has also won a digital bank license in Singapore.\nGrab is likely to increasingly start competing with banks as it expands its financial services.\nIt also competes with such delivery companies as Foodpanda and Deliveroo PLC.\nWHAT ARE GRAB'S FINANCIALS?\nGrab's third-quarter revenue fell 9% from a year earlier to $157 million. Its adjusted loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) widened 66% to $212 million. Gross merchandise value hit a quarterly record of $4 billion.\nThe delivery business has emerged as the biggest segment as more consumers shifted to online food delivery during the pandemic.\nGrab forecasts it will turn profitable on an EBITDA basis in 2023.\nWHO ARE ITS KEY EXECUTIVES?\nAnthony Tan, 39, is the company's CEO and co-founder.\nFellow co-founder Tan Hooi Ling, 38, runs Grab's operations, including corporate strategy and technology.\nBoth Tans, unrelated, met at Harvard Business School, where they conceived the idea of the ride-hailing company.\nGrab's president, Ming Maa, is a prominent dealmaker from SoftBank, who joined the company in 2016.\nHere are some milestones for the Singapore-headquartered company:\n2011: Anthony Tan and co-founder Tan Hooi Ling create Grab in a Harvard Business School venture competition plan\n2012: Launches as MyTeksi taxi booking service in Malaysia\n2013: Expands to the Philippines, Thailand, Singapore as GrabTaxi\nApril 2014: Announces Series A funding\nJune 2014: Launches in Indonesia\nDecember 2014: Japan's SoftBank invests $250 million in a funding round\nAugust 2015: Becomes a unicorn after $350 million funding round\nDecember 2015: Announces a strategic partnership with other ride-hailing companies Ola, Didi, and Lyft that competed against Uber\nJanuary 2016: Rebrands to Grab from GrabTaxi to reflect expanding services\nNovember 2017: Launches GrabPay payments service for third-party transactions\nMarch 2018: Announces acquisition of Uber's business in Southeast Asia through an all-share deal, Uber becomes a strategic shareholder\nMay 2018: Pilots GrabFood delivery service\nJuly 2018: Unveils \"superapp\" strategy that provides a range of services under one platform\nMarch 2019: Reaches valuation of about $14 billion\nDecember 2020: Wins digital full bank license in Singapore in a partnership with Singapore Telecommunications Ltd\nApril 2021: Agrees to list on Nasdaq through a merger with special-purpose acquisition company Altimeter Growth Corp securing a valuation of nearly $40 billion","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GRAB":0.9,"AGC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":409,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":876762519,"gmtCreate":1637366648847,"gmtModify":1637366649162,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"buy and up..","listText":"buy and up..","text":"buy and up..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/876762519","repostId":"1101508779","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101508779","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637365311,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101508779?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-20 07:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Is Touching Record Levels, How High Can It Go?<blockquote>苹果正在触及历史新高，它能走多高？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101508779","media":"The Street","summary":"Apple (AAPL) stock is making a statement, pushing to all-time highs in back-to-back sessions.\nThe st","content":"<p>Apple&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>) stock is making a statement, pushing to all-time highs in back-to-back sessions.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(<b>AAPL</b>）该股正在发表声明，连续几个交易日升至历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is up 1.7% as the bulls again bid higher. That comes after Thursday’s 2.85% rally, which sent the country’s largest company by market cap to new all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>随着多头再次出价走高，该股上涨1.7%。此前，这家美国市值最大的公司周四上涨2.85%，创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58b0d9007b222ec11ec1aee771adb6d1\" tg-width=\"889\" tg-height=\"640\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Apple stock took off on Thursday followingreports of its autonomous car.&nbsp;Apple’s current $2.61 trillion market cap edges out Microsoft’s&nbsp;(<b>MSFT</b>)&nbsp;$2.58 trillion valuation.</p><p><blockquote>在有关其自动驾驶汽车的报道发布后，苹果股价周四上涨。苹果目前2.61万亿美元的市值超过了微软（<b>MSFT</b>）2.58万亿美元估值。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is now working on its sixth straight daily gain.</p><p><blockquote>该股目前正连续第六天上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush analysts added to the bullishness today. They named Apple their top FAANG pick for 2022, while setting abullish price target on the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>韦德布什分析师今天增添了看涨情绪。他们将苹果列为2022年FAANG的首选，同时为纳斯达克设定了看涨的价格目标。</blockquote></p><p> In January, April and July, Apple blew the roof off with its earnings results. Yet the stock didn’t reward shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>一月、四月和七月，苹果的盈利业绩令人惊叹。然而，该股票并没有给股东带来回报。</blockquote></p><p> In the first two instances, Apple stock reversed hard. In both of those instances though, trend support held where it needed to. In the third instance, the prior all-time high near $145 ultimately held as support.</p><p><blockquote>在前两次情况下，苹果股价大幅逆转。不过，在这两种情况下，趋势支撑都在需要的地方。在第三种情况下，之前接近145美元的历史高点最终保持在支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has been a rewarding holding over the past year, but it’s also been frustrating for some investors. It’s slowly but surely pushed its way higher -- but the sluggishness and the selloffs after strong earnings have tested some investors' patience.</p><p><blockquote>过去一年，苹果一直是一个回报丰厚的持股，但也让一些投资者感到沮丧。它缓慢但肯定地推高了价格，但强劲盈利后的低迷和抛售考验了一些投资者的耐心。</blockquote></p><p> And while its gains have been solid, it still lags the S&amp;P 500 in performance this year. Over the past year, Apple's 35% gain overtook the index's 32% return only due to this week's rally.</p><p><blockquote>尽管其涨幅稳健，但今年的表现仍落后于标普500。在过去的一年里，由于本周的反弹，苹果35%的涨幅超过了该指数32%的回报率。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, the two-times range extension from the previously-mentioned September 2020 range comes into play near $173.</p><p><blockquote>此外，上述2020年9月区间的两倍区间延伸在173美元附近开始发挥作用。</blockquote></p><p> We are watching for a close above $160 in order to open the door for a potential rally to the $169 to $173 area.</p><p><blockquote>我们正在关注收盘价高于160美元，以便为潜在反弹至169美元至173美元区域打开大门。</blockquote></p><p> Above $175 and longer-term bulls can look at the $188 to $194 area as the next upside target zone.</p><p><blockquote>高于175美元和更长期的多头可以将188美元至194美元区域视为下一个上行目标区域。</blockquote></p><p> On the downside, a move back below the prior high at $157.26 should have traders on guard for potentially more selling. Below Friday’s low and a test of the 10-day moving average may be next.</p><p><blockquote>不利的一面是，跌破157.26美元的前期高点应该会让交易者警惕潜在的更多抛售。接下来可能会跌破周五低点并测试10日均线。</blockquote></p><p> Along with Amazon&nbsp;(<b>AMZN</b>) , Apple is looking like a great buy-the-dips candidate going forward.</p><p><blockquote>与亚马逊一起（<b>AMZN</b>），苹果看起来是未来逢低买入的绝佳候选者。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Is Touching Record Levels, How High Can It Go?<blockquote>苹果正在触及历史新高，它能走多高？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Is Touching Record Levels, How High Can It Go?<blockquote>苹果正在触及历史新高，它能走多高？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-20 07:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple&nbsp;(<b>AAPL</b>) stock is making a statement, pushing to all-time highs in back-to-back sessions.</p><p><blockquote>苹果(<b>AAPL</b>）该股正在发表声明，连续几个交易日升至历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is up 1.7% as the bulls again bid higher. That comes after Thursday’s 2.85% rally, which sent the country’s largest company by market cap to new all-time highs.</p><p><blockquote>随着多头再次出价走高，该股上涨1.7%。此前，这家美国市值最大的公司周四上涨2.85%，创下历史新高。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58b0d9007b222ec11ec1aee771adb6d1\" tg-width=\"889\" tg-height=\"640\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Apple stock took off on Thursday followingreports of its autonomous car.&nbsp;Apple’s current $2.61 trillion market cap edges out Microsoft’s&nbsp;(<b>MSFT</b>)&nbsp;$2.58 trillion valuation.</p><p><blockquote>在有关其自动驾驶汽车的报道发布后，苹果股价周四上涨。苹果目前2.61万亿美元的市值超过了微软（<b>MSFT</b>）2.58万亿美元估值。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is now working on its sixth straight daily gain.</p><p><blockquote>该股目前正连续第六天上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Wedbush analysts added to the bullishness today. They named Apple their top FAANG pick for 2022, while setting abullish price target on the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>韦德布什分析师今天增添了看涨情绪。他们将苹果列为2022年FAANG的首选，同时为纳斯达克设定了看涨的价格目标。</blockquote></p><p> In January, April and July, Apple blew the roof off with its earnings results. Yet the stock didn’t reward shareholders.</p><p><blockquote>一月、四月和七月，苹果的盈利业绩令人惊叹。然而，该股票并没有给股东带来回报。</blockquote></p><p> In the first two instances, Apple stock reversed hard. In both of those instances though, trend support held where it needed to. In the third instance, the prior all-time high near $145 ultimately held as support.</p><p><blockquote>在前两次情况下，苹果股价大幅逆转。不过，在这两种情况下，趋势支撑都在需要的地方。在第三种情况下，之前接近145美元的历史高点最终保持在支撑位。</blockquote></p><p> Apple has been a rewarding holding over the past year, but it’s also been frustrating for some investors. It’s slowly but surely pushed its way higher -- but the sluggishness and the selloffs after strong earnings have tested some investors' patience.</p><p><blockquote>过去一年，苹果一直是一个回报丰厚的持股，但也让一些投资者感到沮丧。它缓慢但肯定地推高了价格，但强劲盈利后的低迷和抛售考验了一些投资者的耐心。</blockquote></p><p> And while its gains have been solid, it still lags the S&amp;P 500 in performance this year. Over the past year, Apple's 35% gain overtook the index's 32% return only due to this week's rally.</p><p><blockquote>尽管其涨幅稳健，但今年的表现仍落后于标普500。在过去的一年里，由于本周的反弹，苹果35%的涨幅超过了该指数32%的回报率。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, the two-times range extension from the previously-mentioned September 2020 range comes into play near $173.</p><p><blockquote>此外，上述2020年9月区间的两倍区间延伸在173美元附近开始发挥作用。</blockquote></p><p> We are watching for a close above $160 in order to open the door for a potential rally to the $169 to $173 area.</p><p><blockquote>我们正在关注收盘价高于160美元，以便为潜在反弹至169美元至173美元区域打开大门。</blockquote></p><p> Above $175 and longer-term bulls can look at the $188 to $194 area as the next upside target zone.</p><p><blockquote>高于175美元和更长期的多头可以将188美元至194美元区域视为下一个上行目标区域。</blockquote></p><p> On the downside, a move back below the prior high at $157.26 should have traders on guard for potentially more selling. Below Friday’s low and a test of the 10-day moving average may be next.</p><p><blockquote>不利的一面是，跌破157.26美元的前期高点应该会让交易者警惕潜在的更多抛售。接下来可能会跌破周五低点并测试10日均线。</blockquote></p><p> Along with Amazon&nbsp;(<b>AMZN</b>) , Apple is looking like a great buy-the-dips candidate going forward.</p><p><blockquote>与亚马逊一起（<b>AMZN</b>），苹果看起来是未来逢低买入的绝佳候选者。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/how-to-trade-apple-at-record-levels-november-2021\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/how-to-trade-apple-at-record-levels-november-2021","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101508779","content_text":"Apple (AAPL) stock is making a statement, pushing to all-time highs in back-to-back sessions.\nThe stock is up 1.7% as the bulls again bid higher. That comes after Thursday’s 2.85% rally, which sent the country’s largest company by market cap to new all-time highs.\n\nApple stock took off on Thursday followingreports of its autonomous car. Apple’s current $2.61 trillion market cap edges out Microsoft’s (MSFT) $2.58 trillion valuation.\nThe stock is now working on its sixth straight daily gain.\nWedbush analysts added to the bullishness today. They named Apple their top FAANG pick for 2022, while setting abullish price target on the Nasdaq.\nIn January, April and July, Apple blew the roof off with its earnings results. Yet the stock didn’t reward shareholders.\nIn the first two instances, Apple stock reversed hard. In both of those instances though, trend support held where it needed to. In the third instance, the prior all-time high near $145 ultimately held as support.\nApple has been a rewarding holding over the past year, but it’s also been frustrating for some investors. It’s slowly but surely pushed its way higher -- but the sluggishness and the selloffs after strong earnings have tested some investors' patience.\nAnd while its gains have been solid, it still lags the S&P 500 in performance this year. Over the past year, Apple's 35% gain overtook the index's 32% return only due to this week's rally.\nAdditionally, the two-times range extension from the previously-mentioned September 2020 range comes into play near $173.\nWe are watching for a close above $160 in order to open the door for a potential rally to the $169 to $173 area.\nAbove $175 and longer-term bulls can look at the $188 to $194 area as the next upside target zone.\nOn the downside, a move back below the prior high at $157.26 should have traders on guard for potentially more selling. Below Friday’s low and a test of the 10-day moving average may be next.\nAlong with Amazon (AMZN) , Apple is looking like a great buy-the-dips candidate going forward.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":788,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":815725112,"gmtCreate":1630721337836,"gmtModify":1631893209562,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"pls like","listText":"pls like","text":"pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/815725112","repostId":"1186003479","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":529,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836249777,"gmtCreate":1629503519999,"gmtModify":1633684450871,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"pls like","listText":"pls like","text":"pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/836249777","repostId":"2161743232","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":571,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":873610996,"gmtCreate":1636936566043,"gmtModify":1636936566176,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like pls","listText":"like pls","text":"like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/873610996","repostId":"1178164317","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178164317","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1636936020,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1178164317?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-15 08:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GE and JNJ Aren't the Only Aging Companies That Could Benefit From a Breakup<blockquote>通用电气和强生并不是唯一可以从分拆中受益的老龄化公司</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178164317","media":"Thestreet","summary":"After years of turmoil and a valiant effort by its latest CEO Larry Culp, General Electric (GE) fina","content":"<p>After years of turmoil and a valiant effort by its latest CEO Larry Culp, General Electric (GE) finally gave up in its efforts to salvage its broad-reaching business as a singular unit.</p><p><blockquote>经过多年的动荡和新任首席执行官拉里·卡尔普的勇敢努力，通用电气(GE)最终放弃了将其广泛业务作为一个单一部门挽救的努力。</blockquote></p><p> The company has consistently spun off numerous assets across the sprawling conglomerate in recent years to lessen its debt load. Perhaps most important was a $20 billion deal to ship its biopharmaceutical business to Danaher (DHR) in 2020. Yet, it appears the moves were not enough to satisfy Culp's ambitious recovery goals for the once-great industrial giant.</p><p><blockquote>近年来，该公司不断剥离整个庞大企业集团的大量资产，以减轻债务负担。也许最重要的是2020年将其生物制药业务转移给丹纳赫(DHR)的200亿美元交易。然而，这些举措似乎不足以满足卡尔普对这家曾经伟大的工业巨头雄心勃勃的复苏目标。</blockquote></p><p> \"The world demands-and deserves-we bring our best to solve the biggest challenges in flight, healthcare, and energy,\" Culp said in a statement on Tuesday. \"By creating three industry-leading, global public companies, each can benefit from greater focus, tailored capital allocation, and strategic flexibility to drive long-term growth and value for customers, investors, and employees. We are putting our technology expertise, leadership, and global reach to work to better serve our customers.\"</p><p><blockquote>卡尔普在周二的一份声明中表示：“世界要求——也应该——我们尽最大努力解决飞行、医疗保健和能源领域的最大挑战。”“通过创建三家行业领先的全球上市公司，每家公司都可以从更大的关注、量身定制的资本配置和战略灵活性中受益，以推动客户、投资者和员工的长期增长和价值。我们正在利用我们的技术专业知识、领导力和全球影响力来更好地为我们的客户服务。”</blockquote></p><p> Similarly, the lawsuit-besieged Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ)announced it would spin off its consumer health division&nbsp;from its higher growth pharmaceutical and medical devices divisions in the coming two years.</p><p><blockquote>同样，饱受诉讼困扰的强生公司（JNJ）宣布将在未来两年内将其消费者健康部门从增长较快的制药和医疗器械部门中剥离出来。</blockquote></p><p> Judging by the&nbsp;jump in GE stock after the announcement&nbsp;and the early jolt to Johnson &amp; Johnson stock after its announcement Friday<u>,</u>the market certainly looks as though it was offering its initial approval for the streamlining of separate companies. Still, a few questions quickly come to mind.</p><p><blockquote>从通用电气股票在公告后的上涨以及强生公司股票在周五公告后的早期震荡来看<u>,</u>市场看起来确实对精简独立公司提供了初步批准。尽管如此，几个问题很快浮现在脑海中。</blockquote></p><p> First, is this indeed a deft move by management in both cases and therefore deserving of the share-price reaction? And if so, are there more companies that could benefit from following the example set by both of these storied companies?</p><p><blockquote>首先，在这两种情况下，这确实是管理层的灵巧举措，因此值得股价反应吗？如果是这样，是否有更多的公司可以从这两家传奇公司树立的榜样中受益？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Better After a Breakup?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分手后更好？</b></blockquote></p><p> The first line of questioning is one of whether or not two or three firms are truly better than one.</p><p><blockquote>第一个问题是两三家公司是否真的比一家好。</blockquote></p><p> On paper, it would certainly appear to be so. As of Thursday's market open, GE touted a valuation of about $119 billion as a total entity. However, when broken into constituent parts, RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray suggested up to a 20% upside for investors. Judging by company metrics and projections, it could well be even higher.</p><p><blockquote>理论上，情况确实如此。截至周四开盘，通用电气的整体估值约为1190亿美元。然而，当细分为各个组成部分时，加拿大皇家银行资本市场分析师迪恩·德雷(Deane Dray)建议投资者最多有20%的上涨空间。从公司指标和预测来看，这个数字很可能会更高。</blockquote></p><p> Also, each of the spun-off GE units will be less encumbered by the debt of their former counterparts within the broader company, especially as asset sales in recent years alleviate debt and pension issues. Further, future deals are more likely to reach approval based upon diminished antitrust risk, opening a much wider world of opportunity for investors in the streamlined companies.</p><p><blockquote>此外，每个分拆后的通用电气部门都将减少公司内前同行的债务负担，特别是近年来的资产出售缓解了债务和养老金问题。此外，基于反垄断风险的降低，未来的交易更有可能获得批准，为精简后公司的投资者打开了更广阔的机会世界。</blockquote></p><p> The logic is very much the same for Johnson &amp; Johnson as its pharmaceutical business breaks free from the burdensome troubles of&nbsp;lawsuits over talcum-powder&nbsp;products as well as low-margin medicines like Tylenol. Separation is seen as a key step toward unlocking innovation.</p><p><blockquote>强生公司的逻辑非常相似，因为其制药业务摆脱了滑石粉产品以及泰诺等低利润药物的诉讼麻烦。分离被视为开启创新的关键一步。</blockquote></p><p> \"For the new Johnson &amp; Johnson, this planned separation underscores our focus on delivering industry-leading biopharmaceutical and medical device innovation and technology with the goal of bringing new solutions to market for patients and healthcare systems, while creating sustainable value for shareholders,\" CEO Alex Gorsky explained in a statement. \"We believe that the New Consumer Health Company would be a global leader across attractive and growing consumer health categories, and a streamlined and targeted corporate structure would provide it with the agility and flexibility to grow its iconic portfolio of brands and innovate new products.\"</p><p><blockquote>“对于新的强生公司来说，这一计划中的分离强调了我们对提供行业领先的生物制药和医疗器械创新和技术的关注，目标是为患者和医疗保健系统将新的解决方案推向市场，同时为股东创造可持续的价值，”首席执行官亚历克斯·戈尔斯基在一份声明中解释道。“我们相信，新的消费者健康公司将成为有吸引力且不断增长的消费者健康类别的全球领导者，精简且有针对性的公司结构将为其提供敏捷性和灵活性，以发展其标志性品牌组合和创新新产品。”</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, these targets and optimistic angles assume a rosy trajectory for each of the newly formed firms. As the example of DowDupont (now Dupont (DD) , Dow Inc. (DOW) , and Corteva (CTVA) ) shows, splitting up historic firms with sprawling business is not always a process that progresses precisely to plan.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，这些目标和乐观的角度为每个新成立的公司假设了一个乐观的轨迹。正如陶氏杜邦公司（现为杜邦公司(DD)、陶氏公司(DOW)和Corteva(CTVA)）的例子所示，拆分业务庞大的历史悠久的公司并不总是一个完全按照计划进行的过程。</blockquote></p><p> Since splitting, the two storied industrial companies, once combined into one mega-conglomerate, have not had much success.</p><p><blockquote>自拆分以来，这两家曾经合并为一家大型企业集团的传奇工业公司并没有取得多大成功。</blockquote></p><p> \"New Dow will be well positioned to drive best-in-class financial performance and shareholder returns,\" Dow CEO Jim Fitterling said ahead of the firm's 2019 spinoff to a standalone firm. \"We have a focused playbook of cost and growth drivers, clear and disciplined capital allocation priorities and a strong balance sheet. Our path to shareholder value creation is straightforward and in our control.\"</p><p><blockquote>陶氏化学首席执行官吉姆·菲特林(Jim Fitterling)在该公司2019年分拆为独立公司之前表示：“新陶氏化学将处于有利地位，能够推动一流的财务业绩和股东回报。”“我们有一个关于成本和增长驱动因素的集中剧本、明确且严格的资本配置优先事项以及强大的资产负债表。我们创造股东价值的道路很简单，并且在我们的控制之下。”</blockquote></p><p> These pronouncements are very much in line with what GE has said of each of its planned new standalone entities. Also, in a move very much reminiscent of GE's quarterly results in recent years, the pronouncement promised much more than what has actually been delivered.</p><p><blockquote>这些声明与通用电气对其计划中的每个新独立实体的说法非常一致。此外，这一举动很容易让人想起通用电气近年来的季度业绩，该声明承诺的内容远多于实际兑现的内容。</blockquote></p><p> Since it's spinoff was official in April 2019, DOW stock has marked a less than 10% gain. Meanwhile, the S&amp;P has risen over 60% over the same period.</p><p><blockquote>自2019年4月正式分拆以来，道指股价涨幅不到10%。与此同时，标准普尔指数同期上涨了60%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An Example to Follow?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>值得效仿的榜样？</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Still, assuming things do go well post-breakup, these moves could serve as a benchmark for other bigger, older, and perhaps bloated companies. At the very least, this is the logic adopted not only by aging and perhaps overcomplicated American conglomerates like GE and Johnson &amp; Johnson, but also the nearly 150-year-old Japanese giant Toshiba (TOSBF) . In short, it looks as though a trend is taking hold.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，假设分手后事情确实进展顺利，这些举措可以作为其他更大、更老、或许臃肿的公司的基准。至少，这不仅是通用电气和强生等老化、或许过于复杂的美国企业集团采用的逻辑，也是拥有近150年历史的日本巨头东芝（TOSBF）采用的逻辑。简而言之，看起来一种趋势正在形成。</blockquote></p><p> \"Companies that have very diversified portfolios continue to dilute the value to the shareholders,\" David Braun, CEO of M&amp;A advisory firm Capstone Strategic, told Real Money. \"We are in an era where technology and access to capital are different things. A conglomerate is going to have trouble competing.\"</p><p><blockquote>并购咨询公司Capstone Strategic首席执行官David Braun告诉Real Money：“投资组合非常多元化的公司继续稀释股东的价值。”“我们生活在一个技术和获得资本是不同的时代。企业集团将难以竞争。”</blockquote></p><p> He suggested that Emerson Electric (EMR) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) &nbsp; (BRK.B) are two companies that could likely benefit from a similar breakup.</p><p><blockquote>他表示，艾默生电气（EMR）和伯克希尔哈撒韦公司（BRK.A）（BRK.B）是两家可能从类似分拆中受益的公司。</blockquote></p><p> \"They continue to stockpile excess cash they cannot deploy,\" Braun added, voicing the drawbacks of the behemoth business. \"I'm not sure they benefit from that model any longer.\"</p><p><blockquote>“他们继续储存无法部署的多余现金，”布劳恩补充道，并表达了这项庞大业务的缺点。“我不确定他们是否不再从这种模式中受益。”</blockquote></p><p> On the former, he is far from the first to suggest such a move. RBC's Deane Dray has actually been calling for such a breakup for a few years, alongside 3M (MMM) and Roper Technologies (ROP) , firms he also believes could benefit from being a bit less bulky.</p><p><blockquote>就前者而言，他远不是第一个建议采取这一举措的人。加拿大皇家银行(RBC)的迪恩·德雷(Deane Dray)实际上几年来一直呼吁与3M（3M）和Roper Technologies(ROP)进行这样的分拆，他还认为这些公司可以从规模缩小中受益。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe the pendulum is still swinging towards the 'urge to demerge' trend,\" he wrote in a note on Tuesday. \"GE's announcement today could embolden the boards of several other multi-industry companies to move ahead on more aggressive portfolio simplification moves, including Emerson, Roper Technologies and 3M.\"</p><p><blockquote>他在周二的一份报告中写道：“我们认为钟摆仍在朝着‘分裂的冲动’趋势摆动。”“通用电气今天的声明可能会鼓励其他几家多行业公司的董事会采取更积极的投资组合简化举措，包括艾默生、罗珀科技和3M。”</blockquote></p><p> As far back as 2019, Dray suggested a breakup of Emerson's automation and commercial divisions could be a boon for shareholders. While the stock has been on a roll since the pandemic began, such a breakup has already been intensely considered by management. In early February, Emerson announced it would not pursue a split \"unless a major strategic acquisition catalyst is actioned.\"</p><p><blockquote>早在2019年，德雷就表示，艾默生自动化和商业部门的分拆可能会给股东带来福音。尽管自疫情爆发以来该股一直在上涨，但管理层已经认真考虑过这种分拆。二月初，艾默生宣布“除非采取重大战略收购催化剂”，否则不会寻求分拆。</blockquote></p><p> At the least, if such a catalyst is to appear the company is clearly willing to consider such an option.</p><p><blockquote>至少，如果出现这样的催化剂，该公司显然愿意考虑这样的选择。</blockquote></p><p> For Berkshire, it is eminently unlikely that any moves come while both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger helm the conglomerate.&nbsp;But prospects for such a breakup could take many forms considering the business spans industries from insurance to construction to railroads. As such, attempting to size up a form that such a move might take is nearly impossible to forecast.</p><p><blockquote>对于伯克希尔来说，在沃伦·巴菲特和查理·芒格同时执掌该集团的情况下，极不可能有任何举措。但考虑到该业务横跨从保险到建筑再到铁路等多个行业，这种拆分的前景可能有多种形式。因此，试图估计这种举动可能采取的形式几乎是不可能预测的。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, the prospects of a 3M breakup are certainly not out of the question.</p><p><blockquote>最后，3M分拆的前景当然不是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Investors in the storied firm are understandably frustrated. Long-term shareholders have seen the stock stagnate over the past five years, marking a basically flat return even after shares were buoyed by demand for PPE and healthcare equipment that the firm manufactured during the pandemic. Looking back on the boost to the shares, many might have been happier with a pure-play option for healthcare and protective equipment rather than a company also weighed down by industrial, transportation, and consumer segments.</p><p><blockquote>这家传奇公司的投资者感到沮丧是可以理解的。长期股东发现该股在过去五年中停滞不前，即使该公司在大流行期间生产的个人防护设备和医疗保健设备的需求提振了该股，回报率也基本持平。回顾股价的上涨，许多人可能更愿意选择纯粹的医疗保健和防护设备，而不是一家同样受到工业、运输和消费领域拖累的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Toward this end, the company may have already telegraphed its intention to move toward breaking up. In March 2019, the company divided its business into four units. The units, entitled safety &amp; industrial, transportation &amp; electronics, healthcare, and consumer respectively, were created in order to focus the business.</p><p><blockquote>为此，该公司可能已经传达了走向分拆的意图。2019年3月，公司将业务拆分为四个部门。这些部门分别名为安全与工业、运输与电子、医疗保健和消费者，是为了集中业务而创建的。</blockquote></p><p> \"We are continuing to advance 3M into the future, and today's actions will strengthen our ability to meet the fast-moving needs of our customers,\" 3M CEO Mike Roman said at the time. \"Our new alignment will leverage our business transformation progress, accelerate growth and deliver greater operational efficiencies.\"</p><p><blockquote>3M首席执行官Mike Roman当时表示：“我们正在继续推动3M走向未来，今天的行动将增强我们满足客户快速变化需求的能力。”“我们的新调整将利用我们的业务转型进展，加速增长并提高运营效率。”</blockquote></p><p> As operational efficiencies have not materialized to the point of elevating the share price, it is not unreasonable to ask questions as to why separate businesses might further tap into the desired efficiency. In short, the healthcare business might be stronger if it was no longer adhered to a scotch tape and post-it manufacturer and vice versa.</p><p><blockquote>由于运营效率尚未达到提高股价的程度，因此提出为什么独立业务可能会进一步利用所需效率的问题并非没有道理。简而言之，如果医疗保健业务不再依赖透明胶带和便利贴制造商，它可能会更强大，反之亦然。</blockquote></p><p> In the end, if the pursuit of separate businesses proves successful in each of the current experiments under way, the lesson may be that bigger is not always better. For investors, it might also open a number of pure-play options that provide a better investment than their parent companies do at present.</p><p><blockquote>最终，如果对独立业务的追求在当前正在进行的每一项实验中都被证明是成功的，那么教训可能是越大并不总是越好。对于投资者来说，它还可能提供许多纯粹的选择，提供比母公司目前更好的投资。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GE and JNJ Aren't the Only Aging Companies That Could Benefit From a Breakup<blockquote>通用电气和强生并不是唯一可以从分拆中受益的老龄化公司</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGE and JNJ Aren't the Only Aging Companies That Could Benefit From a Breakup<blockquote>通用电气和强生并不是唯一可以从分拆中受益的老龄化公司</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Thestreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-15 08:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After years of turmoil and a valiant effort by its latest CEO Larry Culp, General Electric (GE) finally gave up in its efforts to salvage its broad-reaching business as a singular unit.</p><p><blockquote>经过多年的动荡和新任首席执行官拉里·卡尔普的勇敢努力，通用电气(GE)最终放弃了将其广泛业务作为一个单一部门挽救的努力。</blockquote></p><p> The company has consistently spun off numerous assets across the sprawling conglomerate in recent years to lessen its debt load. Perhaps most important was a $20 billion deal to ship its biopharmaceutical business to Danaher (DHR) in 2020. Yet, it appears the moves were not enough to satisfy Culp's ambitious recovery goals for the once-great industrial giant.</p><p><blockquote>近年来，该公司不断剥离整个庞大企业集团的大量资产，以减轻债务负担。也许最重要的是2020年将其生物制药业务转移给丹纳赫(DHR)的200亿美元交易。然而，这些举措似乎不足以满足卡尔普对这家曾经伟大的工业巨头雄心勃勃的复苏目标。</blockquote></p><p> \"The world demands-and deserves-we bring our best to solve the biggest challenges in flight, healthcare, and energy,\" Culp said in a statement on Tuesday. \"By creating three industry-leading, global public companies, each can benefit from greater focus, tailored capital allocation, and strategic flexibility to drive long-term growth and value for customers, investors, and employees. We are putting our technology expertise, leadership, and global reach to work to better serve our customers.\"</p><p><blockquote>卡尔普在周二的一份声明中表示：“世界要求——也应该——我们尽最大努力解决飞行、医疗保健和能源领域的最大挑战。”“通过创建三家行业领先的全球上市公司，每家公司都可以从更大的关注、量身定制的资本配置和战略灵活性中受益，以推动客户、投资者和员工的长期增长和价值。我们正在利用我们的技术专业知识、领导力和全球影响力来更好地为我们的客户服务。”</blockquote></p><p> Similarly, the lawsuit-besieged Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ)announced it would spin off its consumer health division&nbsp;from its higher growth pharmaceutical and medical devices divisions in the coming two years.</p><p><blockquote>同样，饱受诉讼困扰的强生公司（JNJ）宣布将在未来两年内将其消费者健康部门从增长较快的制药和医疗器械部门中剥离出来。</blockquote></p><p> Judging by the&nbsp;jump in GE stock after the announcement&nbsp;and the early jolt to Johnson &amp; Johnson stock after its announcement Friday<u>,</u>the market certainly looks as though it was offering its initial approval for the streamlining of separate companies. Still, a few questions quickly come to mind.</p><p><blockquote>从通用电气股票在公告后的上涨以及强生公司股票在周五公告后的早期震荡来看<u>,</u>市场看起来确实对精简独立公司提供了初步批准。尽管如此，几个问题很快浮现在脑海中。</blockquote></p><p> First, is this indeed a deft move by management in both cases and therefore deserving of the share-price reaction? And if so, are there more companies that could benefit from following the example set by both of these storied companies?</p><p><blockquote>首先，在这两种情况下，这确实是管理层的灵巧举措，因此值得股价反应吗？如果是这样，是否有更多的公司可以从这两家传奇公司树立的榜样中受益？</blockquote></p><p> <b>Better After a Breakup?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>分手后更好？</b></blockquote></p><p> The first line of questioning is one of whether or not two or three firms are truly better than one.</p><p><blockquote>第一个问题是两三家公司是否真的比一家好。</blockquote></p><p> On paper, it would certainly appear to be so. As of Thursday's market open, GE touted a valuation of about $119 billion as a total entity. However, when broken into constituent parts, RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray suggested up to a 20% upside for investors. Judging by company metrics and projections, it could well be even higher.</p><p><blockquote>理论上，情况确实如此。截至周四开盘，通用电气的整体估值约为1190亿美元。然而，当细分为各个组成部分时，加拿大皇家银行资本市场分析师迪恩·德雷(Deane Dray)建议投资者最多有20%的上涨空间。从公司指标和预测来看，这个数字很可能会更高。</blockquote></p><p> Also, each of the spun-off GE units will be less encumbered by the debt of their former counterparts within the broader company, especially as asset sales in recent years alleviate debt and pension issues. Further, future deals are more likely to reach approval based upon diminished antitrust risk, opening a much wider world of opportunity for investors in the streamlined companies.</p><p><blockquote>此外，每个分拆后的通用电气部门都将减少公司内前同行的债务负担，特别是近年来的资产出售缓解了债务和养老金问题。此外，基于反垄断风险的降低，未来的交易更有可能获得批准，为精简后公司的投资者打开了更广阔的机会世界。</blockquote></p><p> The logic is very much the same for Johnson &amp; Johnson as its pharmaceutical business breaks free from the burdensome troubles of&nbsp;lawsuits over talcum-powder&nbsp;products as well as low-margin medicines like Tylenol. Separation is seen as a key step toward unlocking innovation.</p><p><blockquote>强生公司的逻辑非常相似，因为其制药业务摆脱了滑石粉产品以及泰诺等低利润药物的诉讼麻烦。分离被视为开启创新的关键一步。</blockquote></p><p> \"For the new Johnson &amp; Johnson, this planned separation underscores our focus on delivering industry-leading biopharmaceutical and medical device innovation and technology with the goal of bringing new solutions to market for patients and healthcare systems, while creating sustainable value for shareholders,\" CEO Alex Gorsky explained in a statement. \"We believe that the New Consumer Health Company would be a global leader across attractive and growing consumer health categories, and a streamlined and targeted corporate structure would provide it with the agility and flexibility to grow its iconic portfolio of brands and innovate new products.\"</p><p><blockquote>“对于新的强生公司来说，这一计划中的分离强调了我们对提供行业领先的生物制药和医疗器械创新和技术的关注，目标是为患者和医疗保健系统将新的解决方案推向市场，同时为股东创造可持续的价值，”首席执行官亚历克斯·戈尔斯基在一份声明中解释道。“我们相信，新的消费者健康公司将成为有吸引力且不断增长的消费者健康类别的全球领导者，精简且有针对性的公司结构将为其提供敏捷性和灵活性，以发展其标志性品牌组合和创新新产品。”</blockquote></p><p> To be sure, these targets and optimistic angles assume a rosy trajectory for each of the newly formed firms. As the example of DowDupont (now Dupont (DD) , Dow Inc. (DOW) , and Corteva (CTVA) ) shows, splitting up historic firms with sprawling business is not always a process that progresses precisely to plan.</p><p><blockquote>可以肯定的是，这些目标和乐观的角度为每个新成立的公司假设了一个乐观的轨迹。正如陶氏杜邦公司（现为杜邦公司(DD)、陶氏公司(DOW)和Corteva(CTVA)）的例子所示，拆分业务庞大的历史悠久的公司并不总是一个完全按照计划进行的过程。</blockquote></p><p> Since splitting, the two storied industrial companies, once combined into one mega-conglomerate, have not had much success.</p><p><blockquote>自拆分以来，这两家曾经合并为一家大型企业集团的传奇工业公司并没有取得多大成功。</blockquote></p><p> \"New Dow will be well positioned to drive best-in-class financial performance and shareholder returns,\" Dow CEO Jim Fitterling said ahead of the firm's 2019 spinoff to a standalone firm. \"We have a focused playbook of cost and growth drivers, clear and disciplined capital allocation priorities and a strong balance sheet. Our path to shareholder value creation is straightforward and in our control.\"</p><p><blockquote>陶氏化学首席执行官吉姆·菲特林(Jim Fitterling)在该公司2019年分拆为独立公司之前表示：“新陶氏化学将处于有利地位，能够推动一流的财务业绩和股东回报。”“我们有一个关于成本和增长驱动因素的集中剧本、明确且严格的资本配置优先事项以及强大的资产负债表。我们创造股东价值的道路很简单，并且在我们的控制之下。”</blockquote></p><p> These pronouncements are very much in line with what GE has said of each of its planned new standalone entities. Also, in a move very much reminiscent of GE's quarterly results in recent years, the pronouncement promised much more than what has actually been delivered.</p><p><blockquote>这些声明与通用电气对其计划中的每个新独立实体的说法非常一致。此外，这一举动很容易让人想起通用电气近年来的季度业绩，该声明承诺的内容远多于实际兑现的内容。</blockquote></p><p> Since it's spinoff was official in April 2019, DOW stock has marked a less than 10% gain. Meanwhile, the S&amp;P has risen over 60% over the same period.</p><p><blockquote>自2019年4月正式分拆以来，道指股价涨幅不到10%。与此同时，标准普尔指数同期上涨了60%以上。</blockquote></p><p> <b>An Example to Follow?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>值得效仿的榜样？</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Still, assuming things do go well post-breakup, these moves could serve as a benchmark for other bigger, older, and perhaps bloated companies. At the very least, this is the logic adopted not only by aging and perhaps overcomplicated American conglomerates like GE and Johnson &amp; Johnson, but also the nearly 150-year-old Japanese giant Toshiba (TOSBF) . In short, it looks as though a trend is taking hold.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，假设分手后事情确实进展顺利，这些举措可以作为其他更大、更老、或许臃肿的公司的基准。至少，这不仅是通用电气和强生等老化、或许过于复杂的美国企业集团采用的逻辑，也是拥有近150年历史的日本巨头东芝（TOSBF）采用的逻辑。简而言之，看起来一种趋势正在形成。</blockquote></p><p> \"Companies that have very diversified portfolios continue to dilute the value to the shareholders,\" David Braun, CEO of M&amp;A advisory firm Capstone Strategic, told Real Money. \"We are in an era where technology and access to capital are different things. A conglomerate is going to have trouble competing.\"</p><p><blockquote>并购咨询公司Capstone Strategic首席执行官David Braun告诉Real Money：“投资组合非常多元化的公司继续稀释股东的价值。”“我们生活在一个技术和获得资本是不同的时代。企业集团将难以竞争。”</blockquote></p><p> He suggested that Emerson Electric (EMR) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) &nbsp; (BRK.B) are two companies that could likely benefit from a similar breakup.</p><p><blockquote>他表示，艾默生电气（EMR）和伯克希尔哈撒韦公司（BRK.A）（BRK.B）是两家可能从类似分拆中受益的公司。</blockquote></p><p> \"They continue to stockpile excess cash they cannot deploy,\" Braun added, voicing the drawbacks of the behemoth business. \"I'm not sure they benefit from that model any longer.\"</p><p><blockquote>“他们继续储存无法部署的多余现金，”布劳恩补充道，并表达了这项庞大业务的缺点。“我不确定他们是否不再从这种模式中受益。”</blockquote></p><p> On the former, he is far from the first to suggest such a move. RBC's Deane Dray has actually been calling for such a breakup for a few years, alongside 3M (MMM) and Roper Technologies (ROP) , firms he also believes could benefit from being a bit less bulky.</p><p><blockquote>就前者而言，他远不是第一个建议采取这一举措的人。加拿大皇家银行(RBC)的迪恩·德雷(Deane Dray)实际上几年来一直呼吁与3M（3M）和Roper Technologies(ROP)进行这样的分拆，他还认为这些公司可以从规模缩小中受益。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe the pendulum is still swinging towards the 'urge to demerge' trend,\" he wrote in a note on Tuesday. \"GE's announcement today could embolden the boards of several other multi-industry companies to move ahead on more aggressive portfolio simplification moves, including Emerson, Roper Technologies and 3M.\"</p><p><blockquote>他在周二的一份报告中写道：“我们认为钟摆仍在朝着‘分裂的冲动’趋势摆动。”“通用电气今天的声明可能会鼓励其他几家多行业公司的董事会采取更积极的投资组合简化举措，包括艾默生、罗珀科技和3M。”</blockquote></p><p> As far back as 2019, Dray suggested a breakup of Emerson's automation and commercial divisions could be a boon for shareholders. While the stock has been on a roll since the pandemic began, such a breakup has already been intensely considered by management. In early February, Emerson announced it would not pursue a split \"unless a major strategic acquisition catalyst is actioned.\"</p><p><blockquote>早在2019年，德雷就表示，艾默生自动化和商业部门的分拆可能会给股东带来福音。尽管自疫情爆发以来该股一直在上涨，但管理层已经认真考虑过这种分拆。二月初，艾默生宣布“除非采取重大战略收购催化剂”，否则不会寻求分拆。</blockquote></p><p> At the least, if such a catalyst is to appear the company is clearly willing to consider such an option.</p><p><blockquote>至少，如果出现这样的催化剂，该公司显然愿意考虑这样的选择。</blockquote></p><p> For Berkshire, it is eminently unlikely that any moves come while both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger helm the conglomerate.&nbsp;But prospects for such a breakup could take many forms considering the business spans industries from insurance to construction to railroads. As such, attempting to size up a form that such a move might take is nearly impossible to forecast.</p><p><blockquote>对于伯克希尔来说，在沃伦·巴菲特和查理·芒格同时执掌该集团的情况下，极不可能有任何举措。但考虑到该业务横跨从保险到建筑再到铁路等多个行业，这种拆分的前景可能有多种形式。因此，试图估计这种举动可能采取的形式几乎是不可能预测的。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, the prospects of a 3M breakup are certainly not out of the question.</p><p><blockquote>最后，3M分拆的前景当然不是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Investors in the storied firm are understandably frustrated. Long-term shareholders have seen the stock stagnate over the past five years, marking a basically flat return even after shares were buoyed by demand for PPE and healthcare equipment that the firm manufactured during the pandemic. Looking back on the boost to the shares, many might have been happier with a pure-play option for healthcare and protective equipment rather than a company also weighed down by industrial, transportation, and consumer segments.</p><p><blockquote>这家传奇公司的投资者感到沮丧是可以理解的。长期股东发现该股在过去五年中停滞不前，即使该公司在大流行期间生产的个人防护设备和医疗保健设备的需求提振了该股，回报率也基本持平。回顾股价的上涨，许多人可能更愿意选择纯粹的医疗保健和防护设备，而不是一家同样受到工业、运输和消费领域拖累的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Toward this end, the company may have already telegraphed its intention to move toward breaking up. In March 2019, the company divided its business into four units. The units, entitled safety &amp; industrial, transportation &amp; electronics, healthcare, and consumer respectively, were created in order to focus the business.</p><p><blockquote>为此，该公司可能已经传达了走向分拆的意图。2019年3月，公司将业务拆分为四个部门。这些部门分别名为安全与工业、运输与电子、医疗保健和消费者，是为了集中业务而创建的。</blockquote></p><p> \"We are continuing to advance 3M into the future, and today's actions will strengthen our ability to meet the fast-moving needs of our customers,\" 3M CEO Mike Roman said at the time. \"Our new alignment will leverage our business transformation progress, accelerate growth and deliver greater operational efficiencies.\"</p><p><blockquote>3M首席执行官Mike Roman当时表示：“我们正在继续推动3M走向未来，今天的行动将增强我们满足客户快速变化需求的能力。”“我们的新调整将利用我们的业务转型进展，加速增长并提高运营效率。”</blockquote></p><p> As operational efficiencies have not materialized to the point of elevating the share price, it is not unreasonable to ask questions as to why separate businesses might further tap into the desired efficiency. In short, the healthcare business might be stronger if it was no longer adhered to a scotch tape and post-it manufacturer and vice versa.</p><p><blockquote>由于运营效率尚未达到提高股价的程度，因此提出为什么独立业务可能会进一步利用所需效率的问题并非没有道理。简而言之，如果医疗保健业务不再依赖透明胶带和便利贴制造商，它可能会更强大，反之亦然。</blockquote></p><p> In the end, if the pursuit of separate businesses proves successful in each of the current experiments under way, the lesson may be that bigger is not always better. For investors, it might also open a number of pure-play options that provide a better investment than their parent companies do at present.</p><p><blockquote>最终，如果对独立业务的追求在当前正在进行的每一项实验中都被证明是成功的，那么教训可能是越大并不总是越好。对于投资者来说，它还可能提供许多纯粹的选择，提供比母公司目前更好的投资。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/ge-isn-t-the-only-aging-company-that-could-benefit-from-a-breakup-15830176?puc=yahoo&cm_ven=YAHOO\">Thestreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GE":"GE航空航天","JNJ":"强生"},"source_url":"https://realmoney.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/ge-isn-t-the-only-aging-company-that-could-benefit-from-a-breakup-15830176?puc=yahoo&cm_ven=YAHOO","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178164317","content_text":"After years of turmoil and a valiant effort by its latest CEO Larry Culp, General Electric (GE) finally gave up in its efforts to salvage its broad-reaching business as a singular unit.\nThe company has consistently spun off numerous assets across the sprawling conglomerate in recent years to lessen its debt load. Perhaps most important was a $20 billion deal to ship its biopharmaceutical business to Danaher (DHR) in 2020. Yet, it appears the moves were not enough to satisfy Culp's ambitious recovery goals for the once-great industrial giant.\n\"The world demands-and deserves-we bring our best to solve the biggest challenges in flight, healthcare, and energy,\" Culp said in a statement on Tuesday. \"By creating three industry-leading, global public companies, each can benefit from greater focus, tailored capital allocation, and strategic flexibility to drive long-term growth and value for customers, investors, and employees. We are putting our technology expertise, leadership, and global reach to work to better serve our customers.\"\nSimilarly, the lawsuit-besieged Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)announced it would spin off its consumer health division from its higher growth pharmaceutical and medical devices divisions in the coming two years.\nJudging by the jump in GE stock after the announcement and the early jolt to Johnson & Johnson stock after its announcement Friday,the market certainly looks as though it was offering its initial approval for the streamlining of separate companies. Still, a few questions quickly come to mind.\nFirst, is this indeed a deft move by management in both cases and therefore deserving of the share-price reaction? And if so, are there more companies that could benefit from following the example set by both of these storied companies?\nBetter After a Breakup?\nThe first line of questioning is one of whether or not two or three firms are truly better than one.\nOn paper, it would certainly appear to be so. As of Thursday's market open, GE touted a valuation of about $119 billion as a total entity. However, when broken into constituent parts, RBC Capital Markets analyst Deane Dray suggested up to a 20% upside for investors. Judging by company metrics and projections, it could well be even higher.\nAlso, each of the spun-off GE units will be less encumbered by the debt of their former counterparts within the broader company, especially as asset sales in recent years alleviate debt and pension issues. Further, future deals are more likely to reach approval based upon diminished antitrust risk, opening a much wider world of opportunity for investors in the streamlined companies.\nThe logic is very much the same for Johnson & Johnson as its pharmaceutical business breaks free from the burdensome troubles of lawsuits over talcum-powder products as well as low-margin medicines like Tylenol. Separation is seen as a key step toward unlocking innovation.\n\"For the new Johnson & Johnson, this planned separation underscores our focus on delivering industry-leading biopharmaceutical and medical device innovation and technology with the goal of bringing new solutions to market for patients and healthcare systems, while creating sustainable value for shareholders,\" CEO Alex Gorsky explained in a statement. \"We believe that the New Consumer Health Company would be a global leader across attractive and growing consumer health categories, and a streamlined and targeted corporate structure would provide it with the agility and flexibility to grow its iconic portfolio of brands and innovate new products.\"\nTo be sure, these targets and optimistic angles assume a rosy trajectory for each of the newly formed firms. As the example of DowDupont (now Dupont (DD) , Dow Inc. (DOW) , and Corteva (CTVA) ) shows, splitting up historic firms with sprawling business is not always a process that progresses precisely to plan.\nSince splitting, the two storied industrial companies, once combined into one mega-conglomerate, have not had much success.\n\"New Dow will be well positioned to drive best-in-class financial performance and shareholder returns,\" Dow CEO Jim Fitterling said ahead of the firm's 2019 spinoff to a standalone firm. \"We have a focused playbook of cost and growth drivers, clear and disciplined capital allocation priorities and a strong balance sheet. Our path to shareholder value creation is straightforward and in our control.\"\nThese pronouncements are very much in line with what GE has said of each of its planned new standalone entities. Also, in a move very much reminiscent of GE's quarterly results in recent years, the pronouncement promised much more than what has actually been delivered.\nSince it's spinoff was official in April 2019, DOW stock has marked a less than 10% gain. Meanwhile, the S&P has risen over 60% over the same period.\nAn Example to Follow?\nStill, assuming things do go well post-breakup, these moves could serve as a benchmark for other bigger, older, and perhaps bloated companies. At the very least, this is the logic adopted not only by aging and perhaps overcomplicated American conglomerates like GE and Johnson & Johnson, but also the nearly 150-year-old Japanese giant Toshiba (TOSBF) . In short, it looks as though a trend is taking hold.\n\"Companies that have very diversified portfolios continue to dilute the value to the shareholders,\" David Braun, CEO of M&A advisory firm Capstone Strategic, told Real Money. \"We are in an era where technology and access to capital are different things. A conglomerate is going to have trouble competing.\"\nHe suggested that Emerson Electric (EMR) and Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)   (BRK.B) are two companies that could likely benefit from a similar breakup.\n\"They continue to stockpile excess cash they cannot deploy,\" Braun added, voicing the drawbacks of the behemoth business. \"I'm not sure they benefit from that model any longer.\"\nOn the former, he is far from the first to suggest such a move. RBC's Deane Dray has actually been calling for such a breakup for a few years, alongside 3M (MMM) and Roper Technologies (ROP) , firms he also believes could benefit from being a bit less bulky.\n\"We believe the pendulum is still swinging towards the 'urge to demerge' trend,\" he wrote in a note on Tuesday. \"GE's announcement today could embolden the boards of several other multi-industry companies to move ahead on more aggressive portfolio simplification moves, including Emerson, Roper Technologies and 3M.\"\nAs far back as 2019, Dray suggested a breakup of Emerson's automation and commercial divisions could be a boon for shareholders. While the stock has been on a roll since the pandemic began, such a breakup has already been intensely considered by management. In early February, Emerson announced it would not pursue a split \"unless a major strategic acquisition catalyst is actioned.\"\nAt the least, if such a catalyst is to appear the company is clearly willing to consider such an option.\nFor Berkshire, it is eminently unlikely that any moves come while both Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger helm the conglomerate. But prospects for such a breakup could take many forms considering the business spans industries from insurance to construction to railroads. As such, attempting to size up a form that such a move might take is nearly impossible to forecast.\nFinally, the prospects of a 3M breakup are certainly not out of the question.\nInvestors in the storied firm are understandably frustrated. Long-term shareholders have seen the stock stagnate over the past five years, marking a basically flat return even after shares were buoyed by demand for PPE and healthcare equipment that the firm manufactured during the pandemic. Looking back on the boost to the shares, many might have been happier with a pure-play option for healthcare and protective equipment rather than a company also weighed down by industrial, transportation, and consumer segments.\nToward this end, the company may have already telegraphed its intention to move toward breaking up. In March 2019, the company divided its business into four units. The units, entitled safety & industrial, transportation & electronics, healthcare, and consumer respectively, were created in order to focus the business.\n\"We are continuing to advance 3M into the future, and today's actions will strengthen our ability to meet the fast-moving needs of our customers,\" 3M CEO Mike Roman said at the time. \"Our new alignment will leverage our business transformation progress, accelerate growth and deliver greater operational efficiencies.\"\nAs operational efficiencies have not materialized to the point of elevating the share price, it is not unreasonable to ask questions as to why separate businesses might further tap into the desired efficiency. In short, the healthcare business might be stronger if it was no longer adhered to a scotch tape and post-it manufacturer and vice versa.\nIn the end, if the pursuit of separate businesses proves successful in each of the current experiments under way, the lesson may be that bigger is not always better. For investors, it might also open a number of pure-play options that provide a better investment than their parent companies do at present.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GE":0.9,"JNJ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":842828755,"gmtCreate":1636163533510,"gmtModify":1636163707172,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"liked","listText":"liked","text":"liked","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/842828755","repostId":"1173813098","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":472,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859419885,"gmtCreate":1634720713182,"gmtModify":1634720771473,"author":{"id":"3586853256703013","authorId":"3586853256703013","name":"aprilialand","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad4187787e31be179ad7d058aee6bd08","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586853256703013","idStr":"3586853256703013"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"up and up","listText":"up and up","text":"up and up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859419885","repostId":"1106162200","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106162200","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1634717288,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106162200?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-20 16:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading as it released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\"<blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW发布新操作系统“龙蜥”盘前大涨近2%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106162200","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading and its stocks in Hong Kong rose more than 6% today.\n\n","content":"<p>Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading and its stocks in Hong Kong rose more than 6% today.</p><p><blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW在盘前交易中飙升近2%，其在港股票今天上涨超过6%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7c6d15113fd10fb36e5f590e6fbdf14\" tg-width=\"760\" tg-height=\"369\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> On October 20th, Alibaba Cloud released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\" and announced open source at the 2021 Yunqi </p><p><blockquote>10月20日，阿里巴巴-SW云发布全新操作系统“龙蜥”，并在2021云栖上宣布开源</blockquote></p><p> Conference. At the same time, the operating system laboratory of Ali Dharma Institute was also announced.</p><p><blockquote>会议。同时，阿里达摩院操作系统实验室也宣告成立。</blockquote></p><p> The Dragon Lizard operating system is located on the server side and supports various chip architectures and computing scenarios </p><p><blockquote>龙蜥操作系统位于服务器端，支持多种芯片架构和计算场景</blockquote></p><p> such as X86 and ARM.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>例如X86和ARM。</blockquote></p><p> Alibaba Cloud plans to invest 2 billion special funds for dragons and lizards, and cooperate with 100 ecological partners to promote ecological construction and provide technical support for at least ten years.</p><p><blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW云计划投入20亿龙蜥专项资金，与100家生态伙伴合作，推动生态建设，提供至少十年的技术支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading as it released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\"<blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW发布新操作系统“龙蜥”盘前大涨近2%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading as it released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\"<blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW发布新操作系统“龙蜥”盘前大涨近2%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-20 16:08</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading and its stocks in Hong Kong rose more than 6% today.</p><p><blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW在盘前交易中飙升近2%，其在港股票今天上涨超过6%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7c6d15113fd10fb36e5f590e6fbdf14\" tg-width=\"760\" tg-height=\"369\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> On October 20th, Alibaba Cloud released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\" and announced open source at the 2021 Yunqi </p><p><blockquote>10月20日，阿里巴巴-SW云发布全新操作系统“龙蜥”，并在2021云栖上宣布开源</blockquote></p><p> Conference. At the same time, the operating system laboratory of Ali Dharma Institute was also announced.</p><p><blockquote>会议。同时，阿里达摩院操作系统实验室也宣告成立。</blockquote></p><p> The Dragon Lizard operating system is located on the server side and supports various chip architectures and computing scenarios </p><p><blockquote>龙蜥操作系统位于服务器端，支持多种芯片架构和计算场景</blockquote></p><p> such as X86 and ARM.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>例如X86和ARM。</blockquote></p><p> Alibaba Cloud plans to invest 2 billion special funds for dragons and lizards, and cooperate with 100 ecological partners to promote ecological construction and provide technical support for at least ten years.</p><p><blockquote>阿里巴巴-SW云计划投入20亿龙蜥专项资金，与100家生态伙伴合作，推动生态建设，提供至少十年的技术支持。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106162200","content_text":"Alibaba soared nearly 2% in premarket trading and its stocks in Hong Kong rose more than 6% today.\n\nOn October 20th, Alibaba Cloud released a new operating system \"Dragon Lizard\" and announced open source at the 2021 Yunqi \nConference. At the same time, the operating system laboratory of Ali Dharma Institute was also announced.\nThe Dragon Lizard operating system is located on the server side and supports various chip architectures and computing scenarios \nsuch as X86 and ARM. \nAlibaba Cloud plans to invest 2 billion special funds for dragons and lizards, and cooperate with 100 ecological partners to promote ecological construction and provide technical support for at least ten years.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"09988":0.9,"BABA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":550,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}