domL的个人主页 - 老虎社区

domL

domL

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

128关注

6粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-07-16

$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.

2021-07-04

$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$every bit counts

2021-06-30

Adding more confusion to this I guess

Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>这就是通胀飙升对股市的意义</blockquote>

2021-07-20

Hmmm let's see what happens today

Why Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote>

2021-07-19

$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅

2021-08-23

Erm where's the bottom $Uber(UBER)$

2021-08-10

$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$still waiting

2021-06-28

$Microsoft(MSFT)$lets see what happens

2021-06-25

hmmm

Amazon is likely about to face a much bigger union fight<blockquote>亚马逊可能即将面临更大的工会斗争</blockquote>

2021-06-24

Hmmmm 🧐

A 6.7-Inch iPhone At $900? Analyst Says Apple Will Bring This Product To Market Next Year<blockquote>售价900美元的6.7英寸iPhone？分析师称苹果将于明年将该产品推向市场</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586778691224672","uuid":"3586778691224672","gmtCreate":1623684833129,"gmtModify":1626965946636,"name":"domL","pinyin":"doml","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":128,"tweetSize":54,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.29","exceedPercentage":"80.57%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.22","exceedPercentage":"80.75%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":869775099,"gmtCreate":1632325584611,"gmtModify":1632801188733,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Could be a good time soon","listText":"Could be a good time soon","text":"Could be a good time soon","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46d2ac78ba96956990e1ac0a3eddf7e8","width":"1125","height":"3658"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869775099","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2650,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":869772850,"gmtCreate":1632325517470,"gmtModify":1632801189347,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>finally making a come back","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>finally making a come back","text":"$Uber(UBER)$finally making a come back","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23abbf8a9e8a28f52e48bd0b34d29637","width":"1125","height":"1949"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/869772850","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1848,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":811966430,"gmtCreate":1630284415720,"gmtModify":1704957749078,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Remarkable career 😮","listText":"Remarkable career 😮","text":"Remarkable career 😮","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/811966430","repostId":"1164294381","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164294381","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1630281347,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1164294381?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-30 07:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Is What Apple CEO Tim Cook Plans To Do Before Stepping Down<blockquote>以下是苹果首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)卸任前的计划</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164294381","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple Inc AAPL 0.72%CEO Tim Cook has been leading the tech giant for the last ten years, and a repor","content":"<p><b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;AAPL 0.72%CEO&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>&nbsp;has been leading the tech giant for the last ten years, and a report suggests&nbsp;he \"probably\" won't be with&nbsp;the company in another ten years' time.</p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司</b>苹果公司0.72%首席执行官<b>蒂姆·库克</b>过去十年一直领导这家科技巨头，一份报告显示他“可能”在未来十年内不会留在该公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>The&nbsp;Apple Insider&nbsp;has reported, quoting Bloomberg's Mark Gurman's \"Power On\" newsletter, that Apple employees think Cook will stay around for one more major new product category before stepping down as CEO.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>《苹果内幕》援引彭博社Mark Gurman的“Power On”时事通讯报道称，苹果员工认为库克在辞去首席执行官职务之前，将继续从事另一个主要的新产品类别。</blockquote></p><p> \"The belief inside Apple is that Cook just wants to stick around for one more major new product category, which is likely to be&nbsp;<b>Augmented Reality Glasses</b>&nbsp;rather than a car — something that's even further out,\" writes Gurman.</p><p><blockquote>“苹果内部的看法是，库克只是想继续开发另一个主要的新产品类别，这很可能是<b>增强现实眼镜</b>而不是汽车——更远的东西，”古尔曼写道。</blockquote></p><p> In December 2020,&nbsp;Reuters reported&nbsp;Apple is aiming to launch an autonomous electric vehicle in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>2020年12月，路透社报道称，苹果的目标是在2024年推出自动驾驶电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> \"He also understands that running a Silicon Valley company is typically a young person's game, and he's not going to stay far beyond his prime,\" Gurman added.</p><p><blockquote>“他也明白，经营一家硅谷公司通常是年轻人的游戏，他不会在巅峰时期呆得太久，”古尔曼补充道。</blockquote></p><p> In April, when&nbsp;asked&nbsp;about staying with Apple for a decade, Cook said, \"Ten more years? Probably not. But I can tell you that I feel great right now and the date is not in sight. But ten more years is a long time — and probably not ten more years.\"</p><p><blockquote>今年4月，当被问及是否会在苹果待上十年时，库克说：“再待十年？可能不会。但我可以告诉你，我现在感觉很好，日期还遥遥无期。但再待十年是一段很长的时间——可能不会再待十年。”</blockquote></p><p> Gurman speculates that Cook will retire sometime between 2025 and 2028. He added that Cook's pay deal would also expire in 2025.</p><p><blockquote>古尔曼推测库克将在2025年至2028年之间的某个时候退休。他补充说，库克的薪酬协议也将于2025年到期。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>Just ten years ago,Tim Cook&nbsp;took over as CEO of Apple for iconic visionary Apple co-founder&nbsp;<b>Steve Jobs.</b>&nbsp;At&nbsp;Jobs' departure, some investors and analysts were skeptical of Cook's ability to fill Jobs' shoes.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>就在十年前，蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)接替了富有远见的苹果联合创始人担任苹果首席执行官<b>史蒂夫·乔布斯。</b>乔布斯离职时，一些投资者和分析师对库克接替乔布斯的能力表示怀疑。</blockquote></p><p> Apple integrated its popular voice assistant Siri into the iPhone 4S in 2011. In 2014, Apple unveiled the Apple Watch. In 2015, it launched the streaming service Apple Music. The iPhone X in 2017 came with facial recognition software, a 3D camera, and wireless charging capabilities.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在2011年将其广受欢迎的语音助手Siri集成到了iPhone 4S中。2014年，苹果推出了苹果手表。2015年，它推出了流媒体服务苹果音乐。2017年的iPhone X配备了面部识别软件、3D摄像头和无线充电功能。</blockquote></p><p> In 2019, Apple launched the streaming video service Apple TV+.&nbsp;Apple has also been working on its secret \"Project Titan\" auto project at an undisclosed location since 2014.</p><p><blockquote>2019年，苹果推出了流媒体视频服务苹果TV+。自2014年以来，苹果也一直在一个未公开的地点开展其秘密的“泰坦计划”汽车项目。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares have generated a total return of roughly 1,210% in the past decade.</p><p><blockquote>过去十年，苹果股票的总回报率约为1,210%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Is What Apple CEO Tim Cook Plans To Do Before Stepping Down<blockquote>以下是苹果首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)卸任前的计划</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Is What Apple CEO Tim Cook Plans To Do Before Stepping Down<blockquote>以下是苹果首席执行官蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)卸任前的计划</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-30 07:55</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;AAPL 0.72%CEO&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>&nbsp;has been leading the tech giant for the last ten years, and a report suggests&nbsp;he \"probably\" won't be with&nbsp;the company in another ten years' time.</p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司</b>苹果公司0.72%首席执行官<b>蒂姆·库克</b>过去十年一直领导这家科技巨头，一份报告显示他“可能”在未来十年内不会留在该公司。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>The&nbsp;Apple Insider&nbsp;has reported, quoting Bloomberg's Mark Gurman's \"Power On\" newsletter, that Apple employees think Cook will stay around for one more major new product category before stepping down as CEO.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>《苹果内幕》援引彭博社Mark Gurman的“Power On”时事通讯报道称，苹果员工认为库克在辞去首席执行官职务之前，将继续从事另一个主要的新产品类别。</blockquote></p><p> \"The belief inside Apple is that Cook just wants to stick around for one more major new product category, which is likely to be&nbsp;<b>Augmented Reality Glasses</b>&nbsp;rather than a car — something that's even further out,\" writes Gurman.</p><p><blockquote>“苹果内部的看法是，库克只是想继续开发另一个主要的新产品类别，这很可能是<b>增强现实眼镜</b>而不是汽车——更远的东西，”古尔曼写道。</blockquote></p><p> In December 2020,&nbsp;Reuters reported&nbsp;Apple is aiming to launch an autonomous electric vehicle in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>2020年12月，路透社报道称，苹果的目标是在2024年推出自动驾驶电动汽车。</blockquote></p><p> \"He also understands that running a Silicon Valley company is typically a young person's game, and he's not going to stay far beyond his prime,\" Gurman added.</p><p><blockquote>“他也明白，经营一家硅谷公司通常是年轻人的游戏，他不会在巅峰时期呆得太久，”古尔曼补充道。</blockquote></p><p> In April, when&nbsp;asked&nbsp;about staying with Apple for a decade, Cook said, \"Ten more years? Probably not. But I can tell you that I feel great right now and the date is not in sight. But ten more years is a long time — and probably not ten more years.\"</p><p><blockquote>今年4月，当被问及是否会在苹果待上十年时，库克说：“再待十年？可能不会。但我可以告诉你，我现在感觉很好，日期还遥遥无期。但再待十年是一段很长的时间——可能不会再待十年。”</blockquote></p><p> Gurman speculates that Cook will retire sometime between 2025 and 2028. He added that Cook's pay deal would also expire in 2025.</p><p><blockquote>古尔曼推测库克将在2025年至2028年之间的某个时候退休。他补充说，库克的薪酬协议也将于2025年到期。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>Just ten years ago,Tim Cook&nbsp;took over as CEO of Apple for iconic visionary Apple co-founder&nbsp;<b>Steve Jobs.</b>&nbsp;At&nbsp;Jobs' departure, some investors and analysts were skeptical of Cook's ability to fill Jobs' shoes.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>就在十年前，蒂姆·库克(Tim Cook)接替了富有远见的苹果联合创始人担任苹果首席执行官<b>史蒂夫·乔布斯。</b>乔布斯离职时，一些投资者和分析师对库克接替乔布斯的能力表示怀疑。</blockquote></p><p> Apple integrated its popular voice assistant Siri into the iPhone 4S in 2011. In 2014, Apple unveiled the Apple Watch. In 2015, it launched the streaming service Apple Music. The iPhone X in 2017 came with facial recognition software, a 3D camera, and wireless charging capabilities.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在2011年将其广受欢迎的语音助手Siri集成到了iPhone 4S中。2014年，苹果推出了苹果手表。2015年，它推出了流媒体服务苹果音乐。2017年的iPhone X配备了面部识别软件、3D摄像头和无线充电功能。</blockquote></p><p> In 2019, Apple launched the streaming video service Apple TV+.&nbsp;Apple has also been working on its secret \"Project Titan\" auto project at an undisclosed location since 2014.</p><p><blockquote>2019年，苹果推出了流媒体视频服务苹果TV+。自2014年以来，苹果也一直在一个未公开的地点开展其秘密的“泰坦计划”汽车项目。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares have generated a total return of roughly 1,210% in the past decade.</p><p><blockquote>过去十年，苹果股票的总回报率约为1,210%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164294381","content_text":"Apple Inc AAPL 0.72%CEO Tim Cook has been leading the tech giant for the last ten years, and a report suggests he \"probably\" won't be with the company in another ten years' time.\nWhat Happened:The Apple Insider has reported, quoting Bloomberg's Mark Gurman's \"Power On\" newsletter, that Apple employees think Cook will stay around for one more major new product category before stepping down as CEO.\n\"The belief inside Apple is that Cook just wants to stick around for one more major new product category, which is likely to be Augmented Reality Glasses rather than a car — something that's even further out,\" writes Gurman.\nIn December 2020, Reuters reported Apple is aiming to launch an autonomous electric vehicle in 2024.\n\"He also understands that running a Silicon Valley company is typically a young person's game, and he's not going to stay far beyond his prime,\" Gurman added.\nIn April, when asked about staying with Apple for a decade, Cook said, \"Ten more years? Probably not. But I can tell you that I feel great right now and the date is not in sight. But ten more years is a long time — and probably not ten more years.\"\nGurman speculates that Cook will retire sometime between 2025 and 2028. He added that Cook's pay deal would also expire in 2025.\nWhy It Matters:Just ten years ago,Tim Cook took over as CEO of Apple for iconic visionary Apple co-founder Steve Jobs. At Jobs' departure, some investors and analysts were skeptical of Cook's ability to fill Jobs' shoes.\nApple integrated its popular voice assistant Siri into the iPhone 4S in 2011. In 2014, Apple unveiled the Apple Watch. In 2015, it launched the streaming service Apple Music. The iPhone X in 2017 came with facial recognition software, a 3D camera, and wireless charging capabilities.\nIn 2019, Apple launched the streaming video service Apple TV+. Apple has also been working on its secret \"Project Titan\" auto project at an undisclosed location since 2014.\nApple shares have generated a total return of roughly 1,210% in the past decade.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3437,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":811963373,"gmtCreate":1630284237392,"gmtModify":1704957743546,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>lol","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>lol","text":"$Uber(UBER)$lol","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25f25c331af374d608296586af0b0d2d","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/811963373","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1845,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":811969464,"gmtCreate":1630284211958,"gmtModify":1704957742678,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Keep going up this week!","listText":"Keep going up this week!","text":"Keep going up this week!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3fb18b4bf4e567a91f851697966a8630","width":"1080","height":"2045"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/811969464","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2111,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":835841288,"gmtCreate":1629706779144,"gmtModify":1631885409339,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Erm where's the bottom&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>","listText":"Erm where's the bottom&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>","text":"Erm where's the bottom $Uber(UBER)$","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e7c09ad01f7beb0d13c9280ac088bbb","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835841288","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894902137,"gmtCreate":1628780487729,"gmtModify":1631889951711,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting to see what this is like same time next year","listText":"Interesting to see what this is like same time next year","text":"Interesting to see what this is like same time next year","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc17c216aaa6ff2113ab1c548c359e69","width":"1080","height":"2961"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894902137","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1913,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892465951,"gmtCreate":1628684926673,"gmtModify":1631883894866,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Might have exited too early on this one","listText":"Might have exited too early on this one","text":"Might have exited too early on this one","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caa762e2c6ea72debd3bcffaa373e298","width":"1080","height":"2951"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892465951","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1854,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892001078,"gmtCreate":1628608188494,"gmtModify":1631889951714,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>still waiting&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>still waiting&nbsp;","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$still waiting","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b08a502b91212cbb24b14ca8038dd136","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892001078","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892009858,"gmtCreate":1628608109774,"gmtModify":1631889951717,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"$50s?","listText":"$50s?","text":"$50s?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80bb9f2eb7bf5e4e38e496ee4b192d54","width":"1080","height":"2860"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892009858","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2022,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172657656,"gmtCreate":1626960718875,"gmtModify":1631889951720,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>making it's comeback","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>making it's comeback","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$making it's comeback","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ef200b1f9acef0ec327cd3ea5a04532","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/172657656","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":772,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171740083,"gmtCreate":1626768167342,"gmtModify":1631889951723,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm let's see what happens today&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm let's see what happens today&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm let's see what happens today","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171740083","repostId":"1104187666","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104187666","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626766177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1104187666?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-20 15:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104187666","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.\n\nWhat happened\nAfter four straight trading days of unm","content":"<p>  Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.  <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote>晨星周一对英伟达说了好话。<b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> After four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer&nbsp;<b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!</p><p><blockquote>经过连续四个交易日的抛售，图形和加密货币挖矿半导体制造商的股票<b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）周一逆转，反弹近5%！</blockquote></p><p> Of course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket&nbsp;Monday.)</p><p><blockquote>当然，上午的涨幅转瞬即逝，但截至下午2:15美国东部时间，Nvidia股价仍保持着3.3%的可观涨幅。（你不得不怀疑，如果周一股市没有突然暴跌，股价是否会上涨得更多。）</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"</p><p><blockquote>投资者可以直接向晨星公司发送感谢信，周一援引晨星公司的评论称，“在重新审视我们关于英伟达的论文后，由于与设计相关的无形资产，我们正在将护城河评级从窄提高到宽。图形处理单元(GPU)。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Coming on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周，KeyBanc、BMO Capital Markets和Mizuho等投资银行也发表了类似的积极言论，这些银行将Nvidia股票的目标价定为900美元至1,000美元（周一股价仅为750美元左右），华尔街似乎正在形成一种共识，即卖出的时间已经结束，买入的时间已经到来——也许他们是对的。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.</p><p><blockquote>面对股市大范围崩盘，英伟达周一的价格走强无疑表明投资者厌倦了出售英伟达股票。但话虽如此，当我周一看到英伟达的估值——往绩市盈率的85倍，甚至自由现金流的82倍——我不禁认为该股的定价仍然很高。</blockquote></p><p> And Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.</p><p><blockquote>尽管华尔街持乐观态度，但我担心英伟达股价可能仍会进一步下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-20 15:29</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.  <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote>晨星周一对英伟达说了好话。<b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> After four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer&nbsp;<b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!</p><p><blockquote>经过连续四个交易日的抛售，图形和加密货币挖矿半导体制造商的股票<b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）周一逆转，反弹近5%！</blockquote></p><p> Of course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket&nbsp;Monday.)</p><p><blockquote>当然，上午的涨幅转瞬即逝，但截至下午2:15美国东部时间，Nvidia股价仍保持着3.3%的可观涨幅。（你不得不怀疑，如果周一股市没有突然暴跌，股价是否会上涨得更多。）</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"</p><p><blockquote>投资者可以直接向晨星公司发送感谢信，周一援引晨星公司的评论称，“在重新审视我们关于英伟达的论文后，由于与设计相关的无形资产，我们正在将护城河评级从窄提高到宽。图形处理单元(GPU)。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Coming on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周，KeyBanc、BMO Capital Markets和Mizuho等投资银行也发表了类似的积极言论，这些银行将Nvidia股票的目标价定为900美元至1,000美元（周一股价仅为750美元左右），华尔街似乎正在形成一种共识，即卖出的时间已经结束，买入的时间已经到来——也许他们是对的。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.</p><p><blockquote>面对股市大范围崩盘，英伟达周一的价格走强无疑表明投资者厌倦了出售英伟达股票。但话虽如此，当我周一看到英伟达的估值——往绩市盈率的85倍，甚至自由现金流的82倍——我不禁认为该股的定价仍然很高。</blockquote></p><p> And Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.</p><p><blockquote>尽管华尔街持乐观态度，但我担心英伟达股价可能仍会进一步下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/why-nvidia-stock-bounced-back-like-a-superball/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/why-nvidia-stock-bounced-back-like-a-superball/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104187666","content_text":"Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.\n\nWhat happened\nAfter four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer Nvidia(NASDAQ:NVDA) reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!\nOf course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket Monday.)\nSo what\nInvestors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"\nNow what\nComing on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.\nNvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.\nAnd Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":456,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171757073,"gmtCreate":1626768098992,"gmtModify":1631889951732,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Watching ⌚","listText":"Watching ⌚","text":"Watching ⌚","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f574329488651dec07a80fd67df5f6f","width":"1080","height":"2061"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171757073","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":869,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173747759,"gmtCreate":1626691305571,"gmtModify":1631889951737,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c25ef4c979b91e91a0dee151b481ee4f","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173747759","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173001906,"gmtCreate":1626582003505,"gmtModify":1631889951738,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Finally picking up","listText":"Finally picking up","text":"Finally picking up","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dd69d746254c4ff8f8f275bfddd9b0b","width":"1080","height":"2061"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173001906","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":609,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179305192,"gmtCreate":1626484718716,"gmtModify":1633926373409,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"So many developments over 1 week.&nbsp;","listText":"So many developments over 1 week.&nbsp;","text":"So many developments over 1 week.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0c5e110da8008bb40525857e6abe008","width":"1080","height":"2061"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179305192","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":878,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179302028,"gmtCreate":1626484663864,"gmtModify":1633926374793,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>just keep falling only.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>just keep falling only.&nbsp;","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$just keep falling only.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78086279f073330c8fea56765ef9a3ca","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179302028","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":981,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170211776,"gmtCreate":1626435032595,"gmtModify":1633926792433,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.&nbsp;","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf0fca880220c228bf13f572147e6b39","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170211776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170219507,"gmtCreate":1626434868309,"gmtModify":1633926793921,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"You weren't the best bet it seems","listText":"You weren't the best bet it seems","text":"You weren't the best bet it seems","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/346baccaeaac05fc0516cd8faa5f3880","width":"1080","height":"2988"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170219507","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":820,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144628356,"gmtCreate":1626282262475,"gmtModify":1633928270474,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586778691224672","authorIdStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>still going","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>still going","text":"$Apple(AAPL)$still going","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65a44d4f520f68dbacbdeda03fc4847c","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/144628356","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":170211776,"gmtCreate":1626435032595,"gmtModify":1633926792433,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.&nbsp;","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$trying to wait it out to the split. Feels tough.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf0fca880220c228bf13f572147e6b39","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170211776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155087849,"gmtCreate":1625364229581,"gmtModify":1633941277128,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>every bit counts","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>every bit counts","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$every bit counts","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0084aa5fdb053d0138d5527b9bef49d0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/155087849","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":591,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153087540,"gmtCreate":1624986280180,"gmtModify":1633946137642,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Adding more confusion to this I guess","listText":"Adding more confusion to this I guess","text":"Adding more confusion to this I guess","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153087540","repostId":"1180006824","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180006824","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624979545,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1180006824?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-29 23:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>这就是通胀飙升对股市的意义</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180006824","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basi","content":"<p>Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis</p><p><blockquote>关于通胀对成长股和价值股的短期影响的预期没有历史依据</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11ddc0063c90ff3e9f3bfe11e8ad739\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"850\"><span>AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>法新社/盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Don’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.</p><p><blockquote>不要指望最新的通胀数据来帮助您把握美国股市近期涨跌的时机。</blockquote></p><p> That’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.</p><p><blockquote>这一点值得记住，因为根据最近的经验，你可以情有可原地认为通货膨胀在股市的短期波动中发挥着重要作用。例如，在4月中旬至5月中旬的通胀恐慌期间，价值股的表现优于成长股——正如传统观点所预期的那样。5月中旬以来，通胀担忧消退，价值股表现落后。</blockquote></p><p> It doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>事情并不总是这么顺利。事实上，我找不到通胀的短期趋势与整个股市的表现或价值型和成长型股票的相对表现之间有任何值得注意的历史关系。</blockquote></p><p> To search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>为了寻找这种相关性，我首先分析了耶鲁大学金融学教授罗伯特·希勒(Robert Shiller)自1871年以来的每月通胀、利率和股市数据。我计算了从过去一个月到过去12个月的不同短期时期内通胀与标普500之间的相关系数。</blockquote></p><p> I largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&amp;P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&amp;P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)</p><p><blockquote>我基本上一无所获。考虑CPI的变化在多大程度上解释或预测了标普500的同时变化（通过称为r平方的统计数据来衡量）。无论1个月到12个月之间的时间范围如何，自1871年以来，CPI（或其前身）能够预测的标普500波动不超过4%。（请注意，在衡量这些相关性时，我关注的是标普500经通胀调整后的总回报，以免影响我的计算。）</blockquote></p><p> One of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.</p><p><blockquote>缺乏强相关性的原因之一是股市与通胀又爱又恨。当投资者更担心经济疲软，甚至通缩时，更高的通胀有时被视为一件好事。在其他时候，通货膨胀和股票呈负相关。</blockquote></p><p> This fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.</p><p><blockquote>下图说明了这种波动的相关性，该图表跟踪了过去12个月CPI与标普500经通胀调整后的总回报之间的相关系数。注意没有任何一致的关系。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12ac0cc9ed7a8d766f3308cbf6daeaf5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"882\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.</p><p><blockquote>为了仔细检查这个令人惊讶的结论，我重新运行了我的分析，重点是利率而不是CPI。这很有启发性，因为利率不仅反映了近期通胀的变化，还反映了预期的未来通胀。短期利率变动与股市之间的相关性甚至比我关注通胀时还要弱。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Value vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise</b></p><p><blockquote><b>通货膨胀和利率上升时的价值与增长</b></blockquote></p><p> What about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?</p><p><blockquote>价值相对于增长的表现如何？从历史上看，它肯定遵循了我们在过去几个月中看到的相同模式吗？</blockquote></p><p> Not so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>不是这样的。为了得出这个违反直觉的结论，我分析了自1926年以来美国价值型和成长型股票的月回报率，数据来自达特茅斯学院金融学教授肯·弗伦奇。（具体来说，价值股投资组合包含美国市场账面/市值比率最低的30%，而成长股投资组合包含此类比率最高的30%。）当关注从1个月到12个月的所有跟踪时间段时，我发现通货膨胀与价值股和成长股的相对表现之间没有统计上显着的相关性。</blockquote></p><p> Even more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>更令人惊讶的是，当我关注利率和价值相对于增长的表现之间的关系时，我发现了负相关。这与我们过去几个月所看到的恰恰相反，也与传统智慧告诉我们的价值股在利率上升的环境中应该如何表现的观点相反。</blockquote></p><p> My analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.</p><p><blockquote>我的分析并不表明投资者现在应该反其道而行之，在之前押注增长时押注价值，反之亦然。这一分析的要点是，一方面，通货膨胀和利率与股票市场和价值相对于增长的表现之间存在不稳定且往往微不足道的历史关系。</blockquote></p><p> Short-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.</p><p><blockquote>短期股市计时器需要在其他地方寻找有关市场走向的更强有力的线索。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>这就是通胀飙升对股市的意义</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>这就是通胀飙升对股市的意义</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-29 23:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis</p><p><blockquote>关于通胀对成长股和价值股的短期影响的预期没有历史依据</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11ddc0063c90ff3e9f3bfe11e8ad739\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"850\"><span>AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>法新社/盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Don’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.</p><p><blockquote>不要指望最新的通胀数据来帮助您把握美国股市近期涨跌的时机。</blockquote></p><p> That’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.</p><p><blockquote>这一点值得记住，因为根据最近的经验，你可以情有可原地认为通货膨胀在股市的短期波动中发挥着重要作用。例如，在4月中旬至5月中旬的通胀恐慌期间，价值股的表现优于成长股——正如传统观点所预期的那样。5月中旬以来，通胀担忧消退，价值股表现落后。</blockquote></p><p> It doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>事情并不总是这么顺利。事实上，我找不到通胀的短期趋势与整个股市的表现或价值型和成长型股票的相对表现之间有任何值得注意的历史关系。</blockquote></p><p> To search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>为了寻找这种相关性，我首先分析了耶鲁大学金融学教授罗伯特·希勒(Robert Shiller)自1871年以来的每月通胀、利率和股市数据。我计算了从过去一个月到过去12个月的不同短期时期内通胀与标普500之间的相关系数。</blockquote></p><p> I largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&amp;P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&amp;P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)</p><p><blockquote>我基本上一无所获。考虑CPI的变化在多大程度上解释或预测了标普500的同时变化（通过称为r平方的统计数据来衡量）。无论1个月到12个月之间的时间范围如何，自1871年以来，CPI（或其前身）能够预测的标普500波动不超过4%。（请注意，在衡量这些相关性时，我关注的是标普500经通胀调整后的总回报，以免影响我的计算。）</blockquote></p><p> One of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.</p><p><blockquote>缺乏强相关性的原因之一是股市与通胀又爱又恨。当投资者更担心经济疲软，甚至通缩时，更高的通胀有时被视为一件好事。在其他时候，通货膨胀和股票呈负相关。</blockquote></p><p> This fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.</p><p><blockquote>下图说明了这种波动的相关性，该图表跟踪了过去12个月CPI与标普500经通胀调整后的总回报之间的相关系数。注意没有任何一致的关系。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12ac0cc9ed7a8d766f3308cbf6daeaf5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"882\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> As a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.</p><p><blockquote>为了仔细检查这个令人惊讶的结论，我重新运行了我的分析，重点是利率而不是CPI。这很有启发性，因为利率不仅反映了近期通胀的变化，还反映了预期的未来通胀。短期利率变动与股市之间的相关性甚至比我关注通胀时还要弱。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Value vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise</b></p><p><blockquote><b>通货膨胀和利率上升时的价值与增长</b></blockquote></p><p> What about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?</p><p><blockquote>价值相对于增长的表现如何？从历史上看，它肯定遵循了我们在过去几个月中看到的相同模式吗？</blockquote></p><p> Not so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.</p><p><blockquote>不是这样的。为了得出这个违反直觉的结论，我分析了自1926年以来美国价值型和成长型股票的月回报率，数据来自达特茅斯学院金融学教授肯·弗伦奇。（具体来说，价值股投资组合包含美国市场账面/市值比率最低的30%，而成长股投资组合包含此类比率最高的30%。）当关注从1个月到12个月的所有跟踪时间段时，我发现通货膨胀与价值股和成长股的相对表现之间没有统计上显着的相关性。</blockquote></p><p> Even more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>更令人惊讶的是，当我关注利率和价值相对于增长的表现之间的关系时，我发现了负相关。这与我们过去几个月所看到的恰恰相反，也与传统智慧告诉我们的价值股在利率上升的环境中应该如何表现的观点相反。</blockquote></p><p> My analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.</p><p><blockquote>我的分析并不表明投资者现在应该反其道而行之，在之前押注增长时押注价值，反之亦然。这一分析的要点是，一方面，通货膨胀和利率与股票市场和价值相对于增长的表现之间存在不稳定且往往微不足道的历史关系。</blockquote></p><p> Short-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.</p><p><blockquote>短期股市计时器需要在其他地方寻找有关市场走向的更强有力的线索。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-inflations-spike-means-for-stocks-now-11624928059?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-inflations-spike-means-for-stocks-now-11624928059?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180006824","content_text":"Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis\nAGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES\nDon’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.\nThat’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.\nIt doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.\nTo search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&P 500 over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.\nI largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)\nOne of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.\nThis fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.\n\nAs a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.\nValue vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise\nWhat about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?\nNot so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.\nEven more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.\nMy analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.\nShort-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":585,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171740083,"gmtCreate":1626768167342,"gmtModify":1631889951723,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm let's see what happens today&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm let's see what happens today&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm let's see what happens today","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171740083","repostId":"1104187666","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104187666","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626766177,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1104187666?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-20 15:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104187666","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.\n\nWhat happened\nAfter four straight trading days of unm","content":"<p>  Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.  <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote>晨星周一对英伟达说了好话。<b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> After four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer&nbsp;<b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!</p><p><blockquote>经过连续四个交易日的抛售，图形和加密货币挖矿半导体制造商的股票<b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）周一逆转，反弹近5%！</blockquote></p><p> Of course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket&nbsp;Monday.)</p><p><blockquote>当然，上午的涨幅转瞬即逝，但截至下午2:15美国东部时间，Nvidia股价仍保持着3.3%的可观涨幅。（你不得不怀疑，如果周一股市没有突然暴跌，股价是否会上涨得更多。）</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"</p><p><blockquote>投资者可以直接向晨星公司发送感谢信，周一援引晨星公司的评论称，“在重新审视我们关于英伟达的论文后，由于与设计相关的无形资产，我们正在将护城河评级从窄提高到宽。图形处理单元(GPU)。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Coming on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周，KeyBanc、BMO Capital Markets和Mizuho等投资银行也发表了类似的积极言论，这些银行将Nvidia股票的目标价定为900美元至1,000美元（周一股价仅为750美元左右），华尔街似乎正在形成一种共识，即卖出的时间已经结束，买入的时间已经到来——也许他们是对的。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.</p><p><blockquote>面对股市大范围崩盘，英伟达周一的价格走强无疑表明投资者厌倦了出售英伟达股票。但话虽如此，当我周一看到英伟达的估值——往绩市盈率的85倍，甚至自由现金流的82倍——我不禁认为该股的定价仍然很高。</blockquote></p><p> And Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.</p><p><blockquote>尽管华尔街持乐观态度，但我担心英伟达股价可能仍会进一步下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Nvidia Stock Bounced Back Like a Superball Monday<blockquote>为什么英伟达股价周一像超级球一样反弹</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-20 15:29</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.  <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote>晨星周一对英伟达说了好话。<b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> After four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer&nbsp;<b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ:NVDA)&nbsp;reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!</p><p><blockquote>经过连续四个交易日的抛售，图形和加密货币挖矿半导体制造商的股票<b>英伟达</b>（纳斯达克：NVDA）周一逆转，反弹近5%！</blockquote></p><p> Of course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket&nbsp;Monday.)</p><p><blockquote>当然，上午的涨幅转瞬即逝，但截至下午2:15美国东部时间，Nvidia股价仍保持着3.3%的可观涨幅。（你不得不怀疑，如果周一股市没有突然暴跌，股价是否会上涨得更多。）</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Investors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"</p><p><blockquote>投资者可以直接向晨星公司发送感谢信，周一援引晨星公司的评论称，“在重新审视我们关于英伟达的论文后，由于与设计相关的无形资产，我们正在将护城河评级从窄提高到宽。图形处理单元(GPU)。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Coming on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.</p><p><blockquote>最近几周，KeyBanc、BMO Capital Markets和Mizuho等投资银行也发表了类似的积极言论，这些银行将Nvidia股票的目标价定为900美元至1,000美元（周一股价仅为750美元左右），华尔街似乎正在形成一种共识，即卖出的时间已经结束，买入的时间已经到来——也许他们是对的。</blockquote></p><p> Nvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.</p><p><blockquote>面对股市大范围崩盘，英伟达周一的价格走强无疑表明投资者厌倦了出售英伟达股票。但话虽如此，当我周一看到英伟达的估值——往绩市盈率的85倍，甚至自由现金流的82倍——我不禁认为该股的定价仍然很高。</blockquote></p><p> And Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.</p><p><blockquote>尽管华尔街持乐观态度，但我担心英伟达股价可能仍会进一步下跌。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/why-nvidia-stock-bounced-back-like-a-superball/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/19/why-nvidia-stock-bounced-back-like-a-superball/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104187666","content_text":"Morningstar has kind words for Nvidia Monday.\n\nWhat happened\nAfter four straight trading days of unmitigated selling, shares of graphics and crypto-miningsemiconductormanufacturer Nvidia(NASDAQ:NVDA) reversed course Monday -- and bounced nearly 5%!\nOf course, those morning gains proved fleeting, but as of 2:15 p.m. EDT, Nvidia stock is still holding onto a respectable 3.3% gain. (And you have to wonder if it might be up even more if the stock market hadn't suddenly gone toheck in a handbasket Monday.)\nSo what\nInvestors can send their thank-you notes directly to Morningstar, which was quoted Monday commenting that \"after taking a fresh look at our thesis on Nvidia, we are raising our moat rating to wide from narrow, thanks to intangible assets related to the design of graphics processing units (GPUs).\"\nNow what\nComing on the heels of similarly positive notes in recent weeks from investment banks including KeyBanc, BMO Capital Markets,and Mizuho, which have posited price targets of anywhere from $900 to $1,000 for Nvidia stock (which only costs about $750 Monday), it seems there's a consensus forming on Wall Street that the time for selling is over, and the time for buying is here -- and maybe they're right.\nNvidia's price strength Monday in the face of a broad stock market collapse certainly suggests that investors are tired ofselling Nvidia stock. But all that being said, when I look at Nvidia's valuation Monday -- 85 times trailing earnings, and even 82 times free cash flow -- I cannot help but think that the stock remains richly priced.\nAnd Wall Street's optimists notwithstanding, I fear Nvidia stock may still have farther to fall.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":456,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173747759,"gmtCreate":1626691305571,"gmtModify":1631889951737,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$getting tired of seeing red everyday 😅","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c25ef4c979b91e91a0dee151b481ee4f","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173747759","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":835841288,"gmtCreate":1629706779144,"gmtModify":1631885409339,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Erm where's the bottom&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>","listText":"Erm where's the bottom&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$Uber(UBER)$</a>","text":"Erm where's the bottom $Uber(UBER)$","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e7c09ad01f7beb0d13c9280ac088bbb","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/835841288","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892001078,"gmtCreate":1628608188494,"gmtModify":1631889951714,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>still waiting&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>still waiting&nbsp;","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$still waiting","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b08a502b91212cbb24b14ca8038dd136","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/892001078","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150815715,"gmtCreate":1624892608137,"gmtModify":1633947360852,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$</a>lets see what happens&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$</a>lets see what happens&nbsp;","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$lets see what happens","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34b0652030a435493c8f3251be5ebda2","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/150815715","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":649,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":122606617,"gmtCreate":1624614370339,"gmtModify":1633950525939,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"hmmm&nbsp;","listText":"hmmm&nbsp;","text":"hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/122606617","repostId":"1130523659","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1130523659","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624612468,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1130523659?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-25 17:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon is likely about to face a much bigger union fight<blockquote>亚马逊可能即将面临更大的工会斗争</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130523659","media":"cnn","summary":"(CNN Business)Amazon defeated a high-profile union drive at a warehouse in Alabama earlier this year","content":"<p>(CNN Business)Amazon defeated a high-profile union drive at a warehouse in Alabama earlier this year. But now the e-commerce giant could face a much larger campaign to unionize its US warehouse workers, launched by one of the biggest unions in the nation.</p><p><blockquote>（CNN商业）今年早些时候，亚马逊在阿拉巴马州的一个仓库挫败了一场备受瞩目的工会运动。但现在，这家电子商务巨头可能面临一场由美国最大的工会之一发起的规模更大的美国仓库工人工会运动。</blockquote></p><p> The International Brotherhood of Teamsters voted Thursday in favor of a resolution to make \"building worker power at Amazon and helping those workers achieve a union contract\" a main priority, according to a copy of the resolution. Under the resolution, called the \"Amazon Project,\" Teamsters would fully fund the effort, which would include eventually creating a special Amazon Division to aid workers.</p><p><blockquote>根据该决议的副本，国际卡车司机兄弟会周四投票赞成一项决议，将“在亚马逊建立工人权力并帮助这些工人达成工会合同”作为主要优先事项。根据这项名为“亚马逊项目”的决议，卡车司机将全额资助这项工作，其中包括最终创建一个特殊的亚马逊部门来援助工人。</blockquote></p><p> Teamsters said that 1,562 delegates out of 1,632 representing more than 500 local unions voted in favor of the resolution.</p><p><blockquote>卡车司机协会表示，代表500多个地方工会的1,632名代表中有1,562名投票赞成该决议。</blockquote></p><p> Amazon declined to comment on the matter.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊拒绝就此事置评。</blockquote></p><p> The effort comes on the heels of a landmark union push at Amazon's Bessemer, Alabama, facility in the midst of the pandemic, which ultimately prompted Amazon and its outgoing CEO, Jeff Bezos, to promise changes and concede more needs to be done to improve the work experience of its warehouse employees.</p><p><blockquote>此前，亚马逊阿拉巴马贝塞麦工厂在疫情期间发起了具有里程碑意义的工会推动，最终促使亚马逊及其即将离任的首席执行官杰夫·贝索斯承诺做出改变，并承认需要采取更多措施来改善仓库员工的工作体验。</blockquote></p><p> The Teamsters, which represents 1.4 million US workers including UPS workers, said in the resolution that \"Amazon is changing the nature of work in our country and touches many core Teamster industries and employers such as UPS, parcel delivery, freight, airline, food distribution and motion picture, and presents an existential threat to the standards we have set in these industries.\"</p><p><blockquote>代表包括UPS工人在内的140万美国工人的卡车司机协会在决议中表示，“亚马逊正在改变我们国家的工作性质，并触及许多核心卡车司机行业和雇主，如UPS、包裹递送、货运、航空、食品配送和电影，并对我们在这些行业制定的标准构成生存威胁。”</blockquote></p><p> The union said it is not discussing its strategy at this time, but labor experts told CNN Business that the details thus far indicate a fundamentally different approach to the one Amazon fended off in Alabama, which was led by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). That effort sought to unionize workers at a single warehouse in Bessemer through a National Labor Relations Board election.</p><p><blockquote>工会表示，目前不会讨论其策略，但劳工专家告诉CNN Business，迄今为止的细节表明，亚马逊在阿拉巴马州抵御的策略与由零售、批发和百货商店联盟领导的策略截然不同（RWDSU）。这一努力试图通过全国劳工关系委员会选举将贝塞麦一个仓库的工人组织起来。</blockquote></p><p> The Teamsters' aim is to go after \"Amazon as an employer rather than trying to organize site-by-site and workplace-by-workplace, which was what the Bessemer organizing drive ended up being,\" said Rebecca Givan, an associate labor studies professor at Rutgers University, who noted that there's likely not a single path to success when it comes to the Teamsters' approach.</p><p><blockquote>罗格斯大学劳工研究副教授丽贝卡·吉万(Rebecca Givan)表示，卡车司机工会的目标是“以雇主的身份追求亚马逊，而不是试图逐个地点、逐个工作场所地组织，这就是贝塞麦组织活动最终的结果”。他指出，卡车司机工会的方法可能没有单一的成功之路。</blockquote></p><p> \"[The Teamsters] can try a number of different paths and deploy a number of different strategies. They can push for improvements that might stop short of union recognition but might improve the lives of everyone who works for Amazon,\" said Givan. She added that the Teamsters may seek to push Amazon to recognize representation of its workers or to implement specific policies with or without any formal union recognition.</p><p><blockquote>“[卡车司机]可以尝试多种不同的路径并部署多种不同的策略。他们可以推动可能无法获得工会认可的改进，但可能会改善每个为亚马逊工作的人的生活，”吉万说。她补充说，卡车司机可能会寻求推动亚马逊承认其工人的代表权，或者在有或没有任何正式工会认可的情况下实施具体政策。</blockquote></p><p> In an interview with the Guardian published Thursday, the Teamsters' national Amazon director Randy Korgan acknowledged it may take such an approach. \"Everything is on the table,\" Korgan said, mentioning potentially pressuring Amazon to agree to some sort of recognition.</p><p><blockquote>在周四发表的《卫报》采访中，卡车司机协会全国亚马逊总监兰迪·科尔根承认可能会采取这样的方法。“一切都摆在桌面上，”科尔根说，他提到可能会向亚马逊施压，要求其同意某种认可。</blockquote></p><p> Jeffrey Hirsch, a labor law professor at the University of North Carolina, told CNN Business, \"It is hard for me to imagine a company like Amazon — given their anti-union stance and their power frankly — voluntarily recognizing any union.\"</p><p><blockquote>北卡罗来纳大学劳动法教授杰弗里·赫希(Jeffrey Hirsch)告诉CNN Business，“我很难想象像亚马逊这样的公司——考虑到他们的反工会立场和坦率地说的权力——会自愿承认任何工会。”</blockquote></p><p> Hirsch added: \"The one liability that a company like Amazon has is their high profile nature -- it's a blessing and a curse.\" As the Teamsters may work to further draw attention to issues facing workers, \"that's going to hurt Amazon, potentially more than other companies,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>赫希补充道：“像亚马逊这样的公司的一个责任是它们的高调性质——这是福也是祸。”由于卡车司机可能会努力进一步引起人们对工人面临的问题的关注，“这将对亚马逊造成伤害，可能比其他公司更大，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Per the resolution, the Teamsters said it has \"fought for workers' rights to organize and build power any way we could, including shop floor strikes, city-wide strikes and actions in the streets.\"</p><p><blockquote>根据该决议，卡车司机工会表示，他们“以一切可能的方式争取工人组织和建设电力的权利，包括车间罢工、全市罢工和街头行动。”</blockquote></p><p> Givan said the resolution is a first step and indicates a willingness to allocate resources to the issue. \"We'll see what the work looks like,\" she said, adding that, \"Teamsters working in this industry understand how bad Amazon is for workers, and that will be a key to activating this campaign.\"</p><p><blockquote>Givan说，该决议是第一步，表明愿意为这个问题分配资源。“我们将看看这项工作是什么样子，”她说，并补充说，“在这个行业工作的卡车司机明白亚马逊对工人来说有多糟糕，这将是启动这项活动的关键。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon is likely about to face a much bigger union fight<blockquote>亚马逊可能即将面临更大的工会斗争</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon is likely about to face a much bigger union fight<blockquote>亚马逊可能即将面临更大的工会斗争</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">cnn</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-25 17:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(CNN Business)Amazon defeated a high-profile union drive at a warehouse in Alabama earlier this year. But now the e-commerce giant could face a much larger campaign to unionize its US warehouse workers, launched by one of the biggest unions in the nation.</p><p><blockquote>（CNN商业）今年早些时候，亚马逊在阿拉巴马州的一个仓库挫败了一场备受瞩目的工会运动。但现在，这家电子商务巨头可能面临一场由美国最大的工会之一发起的规模更大的美国仓库工人工会运动。</blockquote></p><p> The International Brotherhood of Teamsters voted Thursday in favor of a resolution to make \"building worker power at Amazon and helping those workers achieve a union contract\" a main priority, according to a copy of the resolution. Under the resolution, called the \"Amazon Project,\" Teamsters would fully fund the effort, which would include eventually creating a special Amazon Division to aid workers.</p><p><blockquote>根据该决议的副本，国际卡车司机兄弟会周四投票赞成一项决议，将“在亚马逊建立工人权力并帮助这些工人达成工会合同”作为主要优先事项。根据这项名为“亚马逊项目”的决议，卡车司机将全额资助这项工作，其中包括最终创建一个特殊的亚马逊部门来援助工人。</blockquote></p><p> Teamsters said that 1,562 delegates out of 1,632 representing more than 500 local unions voted in favor of the resolution.</p><p><blockquote>卡车司机协会表示，代表500多个地方工会的1,632名代表中有1,562名投票赞成该决议。</blockquote></p><p> Amazon declined to comment on the matter.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊拒绝就此事置评。</blockquote></p><p> The effort comes on the heels of a landmark union push at Amazon's Bessemer, Alabama, facility in the midst of the pandemic, which ultimately prompted Amazon and its outgoing CEO, Jeff Bezos, to promise changes and concede more needs to be done to improve the work experience of its warehouse employees.</p><p><blockquote>此前，亚马逊阿拉巴马贝塞麦工厂在疫情期间发起了具有里程碑意义的工会推动，最终促使亚马逊及其即将离任的首席执行官杰夫·贝索斯承诺做出改变，并承认需要采取更多措施来改善仓库员工的工作体验。</blockquote></p><p> The Teamsters, which represents 1.4 million US workers including UPS workers, said in the resolution that \"Amazon is changing the nature of work in our country and touches many core Teamster industries and employers such as UPS, parcel delivery, freight, airline, food distribution and motion picture, and presents an existential threat to the standards we have set in these industries.\"</p><p><blockquote>代表包括UPS工人在内的140万美国工人的卡车司机协会在决议中表示，“亚马逊正在改变我们国家的工作性质，并触及许多核心卡车司机行业和雇主，如UPS、包裹递送、货运、航空、食品配送和电影，并对我们在这些行业制定的标准构成生存威胁。”</blockquote></p><p> The union said it is not discussing its strategy at this time, but labor experts told CNN Business that the details thus far indicate a fundamentally different approach to the one Amazon fended off in Alabama, which was led by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). That effort sought to unionize workers at a single warehouse in Bessemer through a National Labor Relations Board election.</p><p><blockquote>工会表示，目前不会讨论其策略，但劳工专家告诉CNN Business，迄今为止的细节表明，亚马逊在阿拉巴马州抵御的策略与由零售、批发和百货商店联盟领导的策略截然不同（RWDSU）。这一努力试图通过全国劳工关系委员会选举将贝塞麦一个仓库的工人组织起来。</blockquote></p><p> The Teamsters' aim is to go after \"Amazon as an employer rather than trying to organize site-by-site and workplace-by-workplace, which was what the Bessemer organizing drive ended up being,\" said Rebecca Givan, an associate labor studies professor at Rutgers University, who noted that there's likely not a single path to success when it comes to the Teamsters' approach.</p><p><blockquote>罗格斯大学劳工研究副教授丽贝卡·吉万(Rebecca Givan)表示，卡车司机工会的目标是“以雇主的身份追求亚马逊，而不是试图逐个地点、逐个工作场所地组织，这就是贝塞麦组织活动最终的结果”。他指出，卡车司机工会的方法可能没有单一的成功之路。</blockquote></p><p> \"[The Teamsters] can try a number of different paths and deploy a number of different strategies. They can push for improvements that might stop short of union recognition but might improve the lives of everyone who works for Amazon,\" said Givan. She added that the Teamsters may seek to push Amazon to recognize representation of its workers or to implement specific policies with or without any formal union recognition.</p><p><blockquote>“[卡车司机]可以尝试多种不同的路径并部署多种不同的策略。他们可以推动可能无法获得工会认可的改进，但可能会改善每个为亚马逊工作的人的生活，”吉万说。她补充说，卡车司机可能会寻求推动亚马逊承认其工人的代表权，或者在有或没有任何正式工会认可的情况下实施具体政策。</blockquote></p><p> In an interview with the Guardian published Thursday, the Teamsters' national Amazon director Randy Korgan acknowledged it may take such an approach. \"Everything is on the table,\" Korgan said, mentioning potentially pressuring Amazon to agree to some sort of recognition.</p><p><blockquote>在周四发表的《卫报》采访中，卡车司机协会全国亚马逊总监兰迪·科尔根承认可能会采取这样的方法。“一切都摆在桌面上，”科尔根说，他提到可能会向亚马逊施压，要求其同意某种认可。</blockquote></p><p> Jeffrey Hirsch, a labor law professor at the University of North Carolina, told CNN Business, \"It is hard for me to imagine a company like Amazon — given their anti-union stance and their power frankly — voluntarily recognizing any union.\"</p><p><blockquote>北卡罗来纳大学劳动法教授杰弗里·赫希(Jeffrey Hirsch)告诉CNN Business，“我很难想象像亚马逊这样的公司——考虑到他们的反工会立场和坦率地说的权力——会自愿承认任何工会。”</blockquote></p><p> Hirsch added: \"The one liability that a company like Amazon has is their high profile nature -- it's a blessing and a curse.\" As the Teamsters may work to further draw attention to issues facing workers, \"that's going to hurt Amazon, potentially more than other companies,\" he said.</p><p><blockquote>赫希补充道：“像亚马逊这样的公司的一个责任是它们的高调性质——这是福也是祸。”由于卡车司机可能会努力进一步引起人们对工人面临的问题的关注，“这将对亚马逊造成伤害，可能比其他公司更大，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Per the resolution, the Teamsters said it has \"fought for workers' rights to organize and build power any way we could, including shop floor strikes, city-wide strikes and actions in the streets.\"</p><p><blockquote>根据该决议，卡车司机工会表示，他们“以一切可能的方式争取工人组织和建设电力的权利，包括车间罢工、全市罢工和街头行动。”</blockquote></p><p> Givan said the resolution is a first step and indicates a willingness to allocate resources to the issue. \"We'll see what the work looks like,\" she said, adding that, \"Teamsters working in this industry understand how bad Amazon is for workers, and that will be a key to activating this campaign.\"</p><p><blockquote>Givan说，该决议是第一步，表明愿意为这个问题分配资源。“我们将看看这项工作是什么样子，”她说，并补充说，“在这个行业工作的卡车司机明白亚马逊对工人来说有多糟糕，这将是启动这项活动的关键。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/24/tech/amazon-teamsters-union-resolution/index.html\">cnn</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/06/24/tech/amazon-teamsters-union-resolution/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130523659","content_text":"(CNN Business)Amazon defeated a high-profile union drive at a warehouse in Alabama earlier this year. But now the e-commerce giant could face a much larger campaign to unionize its US warehouse workers, launched by one of the biggest unions in the nation.\nThe International Brotherhood of Teamsters voted Thursday in favor of a resolution to make \"building worker power at Amazon and helping those workers achieve a union contract\" a main priority, according to a copy of the resolution. Under the resolution, called the \"Amazon Project,\" Teamsters would fully fund the effort, which would include eventually creating a special Amazon Division to aid workers.\nTeamsters said that 1,562 delegates out of 1,632 representing more than 500 local unions voted in favor of the resolution.\nAmazon declined to comment on the matter.\nThe effort comes on the heels of a landmark union push at Amazon's Bessemer, Alabama, facility in the midst of the pandemic, which ultimately prompted Amazon and its outgoing CEO, Jeff Bezos, to promise changes and concede more needs to be done to improve the work experience of its warehouse employees.\nThe Teamsters, which represents 1.4 million US workers including UPS workers, said in the resolution that \"Amazon is changing the nature of work in our country and touches many core Teamster industries and employers such as UPS, parcel delivery, freight, airline, food distribution and motion picture, and presents an existential threat to the standards we have set in these industries.\"\nThe union said it is not discussing its strategy at this time, but labor experts told CNN Business that the details thus far indicate a fundamentally different approach to the one Amazon fended off in Alabama, which was led by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). That effort sought to unionize workers at a single warehouse in Bessemer through a National Labor Relations Board election.\nThe Teamsters' aim is to go after \"Amazon as an employer rather than trying to organize site-by-site and workplace-by-workplace, which was what the Bessemer organizing drive ended up being,\" said Rebecca Givan, an associate labor studies professor at Rutgers University, who noted that there's likely not a single path to success when it comes to the Teamsters' approach.\n\"[The Teamsters] can try a number of different paths and deploy a number of different strategies. They can push for improvements that might stop short of union recognition but might improve the lives of everyone who works for Amazon,\" said Givan. She added that the Teamsters may seek to push Amazon to recognize representation of its workers or to implement specific policies with or without any formal union recognition.\nIn an interview with the Guardian published Thursday, the Teamsters' national Amazon director Randy Korgan acknowledged it may take such an approach. \"Everything is on the table,\" Korgan said, mentioning potentially pressuring Amazon to agree to some sort of recognition.\nJeffrey Hirsch, a labor law professor at the University of North Carolina, told CNN Business, \"It is hard for me to imagine a company like Amazon — given their anti-union stance and their power frankly — voluntarily recognizing any union.\"\nHirsch added: \"The one liability that a company like Amazon has is their high profile nature -- it's a blessing and a curse.\" As the Teamsters may work to further draw attention to issues facing workers, \"that's going to hurt Amazon, potentially more than other companies,\" he said.\nPer the resolution, the Teamsters said it has \"fought for workers' rights to organize and build power any way we could, including shop floor strikes, city-wide strikes and actions in the streets.\"\nGivan said the resolution is a first step and indicates a willingness to allocate resources to the issue. \"We'll see what the work looks like,\" she said, adding that, \"Teamsters working in this industry understand how bad Amazon is for workers, and that will be a key to activating this campaign.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":128719217,"gmtCreate":1624531227239,"gmtModify":1634004813473,"author":{"id":"3586778691224672","authorId":"3586778691224672","name":"domL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/498db4712a4305a14688586cbd7c8243","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586778691224672","idStr":"3586778691224672"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm 🧐","listText":"Hmmmm 🧐","text":"Hmmmm 🧐","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/128719217","repostId":"1184361611","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1184361611","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1624526066,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1184361611?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-24 17:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"A 6.7-Inch iPhone At $900? Analyst Says Apple Will Bring This Product To Market Next Year<blockquote>售价900美元的6.7英寸iPhone？分析师称苹果将于明年将该产品推向市场</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184361611","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple Inc(NASDAQ:AAPL) will launch two lower-end iPhones with larger screens next year, as per analy","content":"<p><b>Apple Inc</b>(NASDAQ:AAPL) will launch two lower-end iPhones with larger screens next year, as per analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.</p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司</b>据分析师郭明錤称，（纳斯达克：AAPL）将于明年推出两款屏幕更大的低端iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s lineup in the second half of 2022 will include two iPhone lines with 6.7-inch screens — one will&nbsp;serve the low-end market and another will cater to the premium one, Kuo said, as per9to5Mac.&nbsp;Both these models will also be available in the 6.1-inch screen size.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>郭说，苹果在2022年下半年的产品阵容将包括两个6.7英寸屏幕的iPhone系列——一个将服务于低端市场，另一个将迎合高端市场，称为per9to5Mac。这两种型号也将提供6.1英寸的屏幕尺寸。</blockquote></p><p> According to the report, Kuo believes the 2022 lineup will have under-display fingerprint support and it will be available at the most affordable price point for a large screen and expected to be under $900.</p><p><blockquote>根据该报告，Kuo认为2022年的阵容将支持显示下指纹，它将以大屏幕最实惠的价格提供，预计将低于900美元。</blockquote></p><p> The current iPhone lineup includes the 6.7-inch iPhone 12 Pro Max, which is priced at $1,099. Kuo said the 2022 lineup could be named iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.</p><p><blockquote>目前的iPhone阵容包括6.7英寸的iPhone 12 Pro Max，售价为1099美元。Kuo表示，2022年的产品阵容可能会被命名为iPhone 14、iPhone 14 Pro和iPhone 14 Pro Max。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max, launched last year, is its biggest phone to-date. The company’s yet-to-be-announced 2021 lineup is expected to sport the same variants as its predecessor from last year and the big changes will only be revealed next year, as per reports.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>苹果去年推出的iPhone 12 Pro Max是其迄今为止最大的手机。据报道，该公司尚未公布的2021年阵容预计将配备与去年的前身相同的变体，重大变化要到明年才会公布。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.2% lower at $133.70 on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>苹果股价周三收盘下跌0.2%，至133.70美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e12ede45502bee1f416acaa08de1af92\" tg-width=\"661\" tg-height=\"250\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>A 6.7-Inch iPhone At $900? Analyst Says Apple Will Bring This Product To Market Next Year<blockquote>售价900美元的6.7英寸iPhone？分析师称苹果将于明年将该产品推向市场</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nA 6.7-Inch iPhone At $900? Analyst Says Apple Will Bring This Product To Market Next Year<blockquote>售价900美元的6.7英寸iPhone？分析师称苹果将于明年将该产品推向市场</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-24 17:14</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Apple Inc</b>(NASDAQ:AAPL) will launch two lower-end iPhones with larger screens next year, as per analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.</p><p><blockquote><b>苹果公司</b>据分析师郭明錤称，（纳斯达克：AAPL）将于明年推出两款屏幕更大的低端iPhone。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s lineup in the second half of 2022 will include two iPhone lines with 6.7-inch screens — one will&nbsp;serve the low-end market and another will cater to the premium one, Kuo said, as per9to5Mac.&nbsp;Both these models will also be available in the 6.1-inch screen size.</p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么：</b>郭说，苹果在2022年下半年的产品阵容将包括两个6.7英寸屏幕的iPhone系列——一个将服务于低端市场，另一个将迎合高端市场，称为per9to5Mac。这两种型号也将提供6.1英寸的屏幕尺寸。</blockquote></p><p> According to the report, Kuo believes the 2022 lineup will have under-display fingerprint support and it will be available at the most affordable price point for a large screen and expected to be under $900.</p><p><blockquote>根据该报告，Kuo认为2022年的阵容将支持显示下指纹，它将以大屏幕最实惠的价格提供，预计将低于900美元。</blockquote></p><p> The current iPhone lineup includes the 6.7-inch iPhone 12 Pro Max, which is priced at $1,099. Kuo said the 2022 lineup could be named iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.</p><p><blockquote>目前的iPhone阵容包括6.7英寸的iPhone 12 Pro Max，售价为1099美元。Kuo表示，2022年的产品阵容可能会被命名为iPhone 14、iPhone 14 Pro和iPhone 14 Pro Max。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max, launched last year, is its biggest phone to-date. The company’s yet-to-be-announced 2021 lineup is expected to sport the same variants as its predecessor from last year and the big changes will only be revealed next year, as per reports.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么重要：</b>苹果去年推出的iPhone 12 Pro Max是其迄今为止最大的手机。据报道，该公司尚未公布的2021年阵容预计将配备与去年的前身相同的变体，重大变化要到明年才会公布。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.2% lower at $133.70 on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote><b>价格走势：</b>苹果股价周三收盘下跌0.2%，至133.70美元。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e12ede45502bee1f416acaa08de1af92\" tg-width=\"661\" tg-height=\"250\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184361611","content_text":"Apple Inc(NASDAQ:AAPL) will launch two lower-end iPhones with larger screens next year, as per analyst Ming-Chi Kuo.\nWhat Happened: Apple’s lineup in the second half of 2022 will include two iPhone lines with 6.7-inch screens — one will serve the low-end market and another will cater to the premium one, Kuo said, as per9to5Mac. Both these models will also be available in the 6.1-inch screen size.\nAccording to the report, Kuo believes the 2022 lineup will have under-display fingerprint support and it will be available at the most affordable price point for a large screen and expected to be under $900.\nThe current iPhone lineup includes the 6.7-inch iPhone 12 Pro Max, which is priced at $1,099. Kuo said the 2022 lineup could be named iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.\nWhy It Matters: Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro Max, launched last year, is its biggest phone to-date. The company’s yet-to-be-announced 2021 lineup is expected to sport the same variants as its predecessor from last year and the big changes will only be revealed next year, as per reports.\nPrice Action: Apple shares closed 0.2% lower at $133.70 on Wednesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}