IsaacYap90的个人主页 - 老虎社区

IsaacYap90

IsaacYap90

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

157关注

51粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-06-20

Comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-20

If you were living in the New York metropolitan area during the 1970s and 1980s, you probably remember the commercials for the Crazy Eddie electronics retail chain.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-30

Altimmune Inc. $(ALT)$ shares dropped in the extended session Tuesday after the biotech said it was discontinuing study of a COVID-19 nasal spray vaccine because it didn't work as well as anticipated.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-14

Comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-06

Comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-07

The Department of Defense said it’s calling off the $10 billion cloud contract that was the subject of a legal battle involving Amazon and Microsoft.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-03

On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.

AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并不气馁，多次抨击评级</blockquote>

2021-06-15

Comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-06-12

Comment

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3583568085402852","uuid":"3583568085402852","gmtCreate":1620474404220,"gmtModify":1620697530977,"name":"IsaacYap90","pinyin":"isaacyap90","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":51,"headSize":157,"tweetSize":265,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-2","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"宗师交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到100次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.08","exceedPercentage":"80.00%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.06.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.09.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":176027997,"gmtCreate":1626847784419,"gmtModify":1633770431637,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176027997","repostId":"2153619165","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1731,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176024766,"gmtCreate":1626847755655,"gmtModify":1633770431760,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176024766","repostId":"1103660078","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2995,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176024634,"gmtCreate":1626847711728,"gmtModify":1633770431885,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176024634","repostId":"1145126756","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3741,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176024980,"gmtCreate":1626847693040,"gmtModify":1633770432256,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176024980","repostId":"1165880037","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165880037","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626846705,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1165880037?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 13:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ASML Holding EPS beats by €0.03, misses on revenue<blockquote>ASML控股EPS超过预期0.03欧元，营收不及预期</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165880037","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"ASML Holding NV: Q2 GAAP EPS of €2.52beats by €0.03.\nRevenue of €4B (+20.1% Y/Y) misses by €120M.\nQ2","content":"<p><ul>  <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ASML\">ASML Holding NV</a></b>: Q2 GAAP EPS of €2.52beats by €0.03.</li>  <li>Revenue of €4B (+20.1% Y/Y)&nbsp;misses by €120M.</li>  <li>Q2 net bookings of €8.3 billion</li>  <li>ASML announces a new share buyback program of up to €9 billion to be executed by December 31, 2023.</li>  <li>\"Our second-quarter net sales came in at €4.0 billion, which is within our guidance. The gross margin came in at 50.9%, above our guidance, which is mainly due to higher revenue in software upgrades as customers want to increase capacity quickly, as well as one-off revenue accounting releases. Our second-quarter net bookings came in at €8.3 billion, including €4.9 billion from EUV systems, bringing the total backlog at €17.5 billion,\"&nbsp;said ASML President and Chief Executive Officer&nbsp;Peter Wennink.</li>  <li><b>Guidance:</b>&nbsp;The company expects third-quarter net sales between €5.2 billion and €5.4 billion with a gross margin between 51% and 52%, R&amp;D costs of around €645 million and SG&amp;A costs of around €180 million. The estimated annualized effective tax rate is expected to be around 15% for 2021.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ASML\">ASML控股公司</a></b>：第二季度GAAP每股收益为2.52欧元，超出0.03欧元。</li><li>收入为40亿欧元（同比增长20.1%）低于预期1.2亿欧元。</li><li>第二季度净预订量为83亿欧元</li><li>ASML宣布一项高达90亿欧元的新股票回购计划，将于2023年12月31日执行。</li><li>“我们第二季度的净销售额为40亿欧元，在我们的指导范围内。毛利率为50.9%，高于我们的指导，这主要是由于客户希望快速增加产能，软件升级收入增加，以及一次性收入会计发布。我们第二季度的净预订量为83亿欧元，其中包括来自EUV systems的49亿欧元，使积压订单总额达到175亿欧元，”ASML总裁兼首席执行官Peter Wennink说道。</li><li><b>指导意见：</b>该公司预计第三季度净销售额在52亿欧元至54亿欧元之间，毛利率在51%至52%之间，研发成本约为6.45亿欧元，SG&amp;A成本约为1.8亿欧元。预计2021年年化有效税率约为15%。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ASML Holding EPS beats by €0.03, misses on revenue<blockquote>ASML控股EPS超过预期0.03欧元，营收不及预期</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nASML Holding EPS beats by €0.03, misses on revenue<blockquote>ASML控股EPS超过预期0.03欧元，营收不及预期</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 13:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ASML\">ASML Holding NV</a></b>: Q2 GAAP EPS of €2.52beats by €0.03.</li>  <li>Revenue of €4B (+20.1% Y/Y)&nbsp;misses by €120M.</li>  <li>Q2 net bookings of €8.3 billion</li>  <li>ASML announces a new share buyback program of up to €9 billion to be executed by December 31, 2023.</li>  <li>\"Our second-quarter net sales came in at €4.0 billion, which is within our guidance. The gross margin came in at 50.9%, above our guidance, which is mainly due to higher revenue in software upgrades as customers want to increase capacity quickly, as well as one-off revenue accounting releases. Our second-quarter net bookings came in at €8.3 billion, including €4.9 billion from EUV systems, bringing the total backlog at €17.5 billion,\"&nbsp;said ASML President and Chief Executive Officer&nbsp;Peter Wennink.</li>  <li><b>Guidance:</b>&nbsp;The company expects third-quarter net sales between €5.2 billion and €5.4 billion with a gross margin between 51% and 52%, R&amp;D costs of around €645 million and SG&amp;A costs of around €180 million. The estimated annualized effective tax rate is expected to be around 15% for 2021.</li> </ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ASML\">ASML控股公司</a></b>：第二季度GAAP每股收益为2.52欧元，超出0.03欧元。</li><li>收入为40亿欧元（同比增长20.1%）低于预期1.2亿欧元。</li><li>第二季度净预订量为83亿欧元</li><li>ASML宣布一项高达90亿欧元的新股票回购计划，将于2023年12月31日执行。</li><li>“我们第二季度的净销售额为40亿欧元，在我们的指导范围内。毛利率为50.9%，高于我们的指导，这主要是由于客户希望快速增加产能，软件升级收入增加，以及一次性收入会计发布。我们第二季度的净预订量为83亿欧元，其中包括来自EUV systems的49亿欧元，使积压订单总额达到175亿欧元，”ASML总裁兼首席执行官Peter Wennink说道。</li><li><b>指导意见：</b>该公司预计第三季度净销售额在52亿欧元至54亿欧元之间，毛利率在51%至52%之间，研发成本约为6.45亿欧元，SG&amp;A成本约为1.8亿欧元。预计2021年年化有效税率约为15%。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3717203-asml-holding-eps-beats-by-003-misses-on-revenue\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ASML":"阿斯麦"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3717203-asml-holding-eps-beats-by-003-misses-on-revenue","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1165880037","content_text":"ASML Holding NV: Q2 GAAP EPS of €2.52beats by €0.03.\nRevenue of €4B (+20.1% Y/Y) misses by €120M.\nQ2 net bookings of €8.3 billion\nASML announces a new share buyback program of up to €9 billion to be executed by December 31, 2023.\n\"Our second-quarter net sales came in at €4.0 billion, which is within our guidance. The gross margin came in at 50.9%, above our guidance, which is mainly due to higher revenue in software upgrades as customers want to increase capacity quickly, as well as one-off revenue accounting releases. Our second-quarter net bookings came in at €8.3 billion, including €4.9 billion from EUV systems, bringing the total backlog at €17.5 billion,\" said ASML President and Chief Executive Officer Peter Wennink.\nGuidance: The company expects third-quarter net sales between €5.2 billion and €5.4 billion with a gross margin between 51% and 52%, R&D costs of around €645 million and SG&A costs of around €180 million. The estimated annualized effective tax rate is expected to be around 15% for 2021.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ASML":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2257,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176025842,"gmtCreate":1626847670686,"gmtModify":1633770432621,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/176025842","repostId":"1109432059","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109432059","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626847295,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109432059?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-21 14:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jeff Bezos Reveals Blue Origin Has Sold $100M Worth Of Tickets, 'Demand Is Very, Very High'<blockquote>杰夫·贝索斯透露蓝色起源已售出价值1亿美元的门票，“需求非常非常高”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109432059","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Amazon.com, Inc Chair Jeff Bezos revealed Tuesday that his funded space tourism company Blue Origin ","content":"<p><div> Amazon.com, Inc Chair Jeff Bezos revealed Tuesday that his funded space tourism company Blue Origin has sold $100 million worth of tickets for future flights. What Happened:“The demand is very, very ...</p><p><blockquote><div>亚马逊公司董事长杰夫·贝索斯周二透露，他资助的太空旅游公司蓝色起源已经售出了价值1亿美元的未来航班机票。发生了什么：“需求非常非常...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jeff Bezos Reveals Blue Origin Has Sold $100M Worth Of Tickets, 'Demand Is Very, Very High'<blockquote>杰夫·贝索斯透露蓝色起源已售出价值1亿美元的门票，“需求非常非常高”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJeff Bezos Reveals Blue Origin Has Sold $100M Worth Of Tickets, 'Demand Is Very, Very High'<blockquote>杰夫·贝索斯透露蓝色起源已售出价值1亿美元的门票，“需求非常非常高”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-21 14:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Amazon.com, Inc Chair Jeff Bezos revealed Tuesday that his funded space tourism company Blue Origin has sold $100 million worth of tickets for future flights. What Happened:“The demand is very, very ...</p><p><blockquote><div>亚马逊公司董事长杰夫·贝索斯周二透露，他资助的太空旅游公司蓝色起源已经售出了价值1亿美元的未来航班机票。发生了什么：“需求非常非常...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","SPCE":"维珍银河"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/07/22075328/jeff-bezos-reveals-blue-origin-has-sold-100m-worth-of-tickets-demand-is-very-very-high","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109432059","content_text":"Amazon.com, Inc Chair Jeff Bezos revealed Tuesday that his funded space tourism company Blue Origin has sold $100 million worth of tickets for future flights.\nWhat Happened:“The demand is very, very high,” Bezos said at the post-flight presentation of Blue Origin.\nOn Tuesday, Bezos and three others including the world’s youngest and oldest humans to have reached space, successfully flewonboard the New Shepard rocket.\nNo disclosures were made by Bezos on how much it would cost for a seat on New Shepard.\nBezos revealed that Blue Origin is due to fly human missions two more times in 2021 but was “not sure yet” on the number of crewed flights in 2022, as per CNBC.\nWhy It Matters:Among the four passengers that flew to space on Tuesday with Blue Origin, only the 18-year-old Oliver Daemen was a paying one.\nAn anonymous person who originally bid $28 billion to fly with Bezos did not do so due to “scheduling conflicts,” as per Blue Origin.\nRival Sir Richard Branson-founded Virgin Galactic Holdings has600 reservationsfrom paying customers who are willing to shell out between $200,000 to $250,000 to go to space.\nAmong the celebrities going to space with Virgin Galactic include Justin Bieber,Leonardo DiCaprio,and Tesla IncTSLA 2.21%and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.\nWally Funk, the co-passenger of Bezos, who at age 82 became the oldest person to go to space, has alsoplaced a depositto fly with Virgin Galactic.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPCE":0.9,"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171418658,"gmtCreate":1626755681374,"gmtModify":1633771318696,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171418658","repostId":"1129846769","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129846769","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626751789,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1129846769?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-20 11:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Worried about inflation? Here’s how investments did in the 1970s<blockquote>担心通货膨胀？以下是20世纪70年代的投资表现</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129846769","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"In the 1990s movie The Shipping News, an old newspaperman explains to Kevin Spacey how to cover the ","content":"<p>In the 1990s movie The Shipping News, an old newspaperman explains to Kevin Spacey how to cover the news. If there is a storm visible anywhere, he explains, you write “Storm threatens the town,” even if the storm is nowhere near and is unlikely to hit. If—as expected—the storm never hits, you just write the follow up: “Town spared by storm.”</p><p><blockquote>在20世纪90年代的电影《航运新闻》中，一位老记者向凯文·史派西解释如何报道新闻。他解释说，如果任何地方都有可见的风暴，你就会写“风暴威胁着城镇”，即使风暴不在附近，也不太可能来袭。如果——正如预期的那样——风暴从未袭击，你只需写下后续内容：“城镇幸免于风暴。”</blockquote></p><p> Readers may be excused for thinking something similar about the latest stories about looming, threatening, surging, terrifying inflation. Yes, the inflation forecasts were surging months ago, and hit 8-year highs. Had they continued there would be grounds to worry. But they haven’t continued. On the contrary, they’ve been falling for two months. The bond market’s 5-year inflation forecast is now lower than it was in mid-March. The market sees five-year inflation running at around 2.6%. That’s higher than we’ve been used to for a decade, but it’s nothing to cause any significant alarm.</p><p><blockquote>读者可能会对最近关于迫在眉睫、威胁、飙升、可怕的通货膨胀的故事有类似的想法。是的，几个月前通胀预测飙升，并创下8年来的新高。如果他们继续下去，就有理由担心。但他们没有继续。相反，他们已经下跌了两个月。债券市场的5年通胀预期现在低于3月中旬。市场预计五年通胀率约为2.6%。这比我们十年来所习惯的要高，但这并没有引起任何重大恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> That can change, of course. Maybe it will. We’ll see.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这种情况可能会改变。也许会。我们走着瞧。</blockquote></p><p> But with all this talk I got to thinking about the obvious question. If serious inflation really does hit, what can we do about it? How can we protect our investments?</p><p><blockquote>但是通过这些谈话，我开始思考一个显而易见的问题。如果严重的通货膨胀真的来袭，我们能做些什么呢？我们如何保护我们的投资？</blockquote></p><p> That’s an especially key question for today’s retirees and those expecting to retire soon. When we’re older we’re generally advised to keep most of our money in more “conservative” investments, meaning things like bonds, that involve less risk. Someone in their 20s or 30s may not worry unduly if their retirement savings plunge 30% in a market rout or an inflationary spiral. For someone in their 60s, let alone older, that can become a major financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>对于今天的退休人员和那些预计很快退休的人来说，这是一个特别关键的问题。当我们长大后，通常建议我们将大部分资金投资于更“保守”的投资，即债券等风险较小的投资。如果20多岁或30多岁的人的退休储蓄在市场暴跌或通胀螺旋中暴跌30%，他们可能不会过度担心。对于60多岁的人来说，更不用说老年人了，这可能会成为一场重大的财务危机。</blockquote></p><p> So I went back and dug up the information from the last, infamous inflationary spiral in the 1970s, when consumer price inflation often topped 10% a year. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus pointed out that no one ever walks through the same stream twice, because the second time it’s not the same stream, and we’re not the same person. Everything changes. There is no guarantee the next inflationary boom, even if it happens, will look anything like the last one — any more than we should assume that it will be accompanied by outbreaks of disco music and flared jeans.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我回去挖掘了20世纪70年代上一次臭名昭著的通胀螺旋的信息，当时消费者价格通胀经常超过每年10%。希腊哲学家赫拉克利特指出，没有人会两次走过同一条小溪，因为第二次就不是同一条小溪了，我们也不是同一个人了。一切都变了。不能保证下一次通胀繁荣，即使发生了，看起来也会像上一次一样——就像我们不应该假设它会伴随着迪斯科音乐和喇叭牛仔裤的爆发一样。</blockquote></p><p> Nonetheless the chart above shows the total returns, after adjusting for inflation, of various asset classes from December 1971 to December 1981. (I used those dates because the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, starts their data series then.) The data on energy stocks came from data compiled by professor Ken French at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，上图显示了1971年12月至1981年12月各种资产类别经通胀调整后的总回报。（我使用这些日期是因为全国房地产投资信托协会（NAREIT）在那时开始他们的数据系列。）能源股的数据来自达特茅斯学院塔克商学院肯·弗伦奇教授汇编的数据。</blockquote></p><p> This is what happened to your purchasing power if you invested in these assets and hung on for 10 years. (I’ve excluded gold, which is a different story.)</p><p><blockquote>如果你投资这些资产并坚持10年，你的购买力就会发生这种情况。（我已经排除了黄金，这是一个不同的故事。）</blockquote></p><p> The key standout is that you really didn’t want to own Treasury bonds. The near 40% loss of purchasing power over 10 years is somewhat notional—it is derived from the compound annual returns on 10 Year Treasurys compiled by New York University’s Stern School of Business, divided by the consumer-price index—but tells a story nonetheless. (In Great Britain, where inflation was even worse, government bonds during the 1970s became known as “certificates of confiscation.” Ouch.)</p><p><blockquote>关键的突出之处在于，你真的不想拥有国债。10年内购买力损失近40%在某种程度上是名义上的——它来自纽约大学斯特恩商学院编制的10年期美国国债的复合年回报率除以消费者价格指数——但仍然讲述了一个故事。（在通货膨胀更严重的英国，20世纪70年代的政府债券被称为“没收证书”。哎哟。）</blockquote></p><p> Holding them cost you money. Lots of it.</p><p><blockquote>拿着它们要花钱。很多。</blockquote></p><p> You could argue that the danger today is even greater, simply because the yields on long-term Treasury bonds are so low. Federal Reserve quantitative easing, bond buying, and zero interest-rate policies have left Treasury yields at their lowest on record—which means the turns would be a disaster if inflation reared its head.</p><p><blockquote>你可能会说，今天的危险甚至更大，仅仅是因为长期国债的收益率如此之低。美联储的量化宽松、债券购买和零利率政策使美国国债收益率处于有记录以来的最低水平——这意味着如果通胀抬头，这将是一场灾难。</blockquote></p><p> Corporate bonds and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;were also terrible investments. It’s worth remembering that these are real term losses over a decade, which means investors didn’t just lose a lot of money—they also lost a lot of time.</p><p><blockquote>公司债券和标普500也是糟糕的投资。值得记住的是，这些是十年来的实际定期损失，这意味着投资者不仅损失了很多钱，还损失了很多时间。</blockquote></p><p> Utility stocks weren’t great, but they held up better. And Treasury bills—short-term paper—did better still. But once again you were going backward when you needed to be going forwards.</p><p><blockquote>公用事业股表现不佳，但表现较好。短期票据——国库券——表现更好。但是当你需要前进的时候，你又一次倒退了。</blockquote></p><p> No one who remembers the 1970s will be surprised that energy companies boomed. Less well-remembered, maybe, is that REITs also did pretty well. These numbers, incidentally, represented property-owning REITs and excluded mortgage REITs, which own loans.</p><p><blockquote>任何记得20世纪70年代的人都不会对能源公司的蓬勃发展感到惊讶。也许不太为人所知的是，房地产投资信托基金的表现也相当不错。顺便说一句，这些数字代表拥有财产的房地产投资信托基金，不包括拥有贷款的抵押房地产投资信托基金。</blockquote></p><p> But there are two caveats to this. The first is that of course energy stocks did well, because a key driver of inflation in the 1970s was the rise of OPEC and two oil embargoes it imposed on the West for political reasons. Cue Heraclitus. There is no particular reason to assume that the next inflationary surge will be the same.</p><p><blockquote>但对此有两个警告。首先，能源股当然表现良好，因为20世纪70年代通胀的一个关键驱动因素是欧佩克的崛起及其出于政治原因对西方实施的两次石油禁运。提示赫拉克利特。没有特别的理由假设下一次通胀飙升会是一样的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second caveat is that although REITs ended up doing well, they were volatile along the way. In particular, REIT prices collapsed in the OPEC-driven recession of 1972-4. And according to FactSet, U.S. REITs today already look pretty expensive on some measures. For instance it reckons that the forecast dividend yield on the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (a reasonable benchmark for the industry) is just 2.9% — by far the lowest since it was launched in 2004. Looking through NAREIT data, I can’t find a moment since 1971 when the overall yield on REITs was this low. During the real estate bubble in 2007, incidentally, the yield bottomed out no lower than 3.6%</p><p><blockquote>第二个警告是，尽管房地产投资信托基金最终表现良好，但一路上波动较大。特别是，房地产投资信托基金价格在1972-1974年欧佩克引发的经济衰退中暴跌。根据FactSet的数据，从某些指标来看，如今的美国房地产投资信托基金看起来已经相当昂贵。例如，它估计Vanguard Real Estate ETF（该行业的合理基准）的预测股息收益率仅为2.9%，是自2004年推出以来的最低水平。翻阅NAREIT数据，自1971年以来，我找不到REITs整体收益率如此之低的时刻。2007年房地产泡沫期间，顺带一提，收益率见底不低于3.6%</blockquote></p><p> So it may be that REITs offer less inflation protection today than we would hope.</p><p><blockquote>因此，如今房地产投资信托基金提供的通胀保护可能比我们希望的要少。</blockquote></p><p> One key difference in the 1970s is that there were no “inflation-protected” Treasury bonds to keep investors protected. So-called TIPS are in theory almost the perfect investment for retirees. They are issued by the U.S. government and their coupons are safe against default. Meanwhile their coupons effectively adjust to reflect changes in consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪70年代的一个关键区别是，没有“通胀保值”国债来保护投资者。理论上，所谓的小费几乎是退休人员的完美投资。它们由美国政府发行，其优惠券不会违约。与此同时，他们的优惠券有效地调整以反映消费价格的变化。</blockquote></p><p> The problem today is that TIPS—like almost everything else in the bond market—look incredibly expensive. Most TIPS already lock in an actual loss of purchasing power if you buy them today. For example if you buy 5 year TIPS bonds and hold them for 5 years you’ll end up losing 9% of your purchasing power. And 30-year TIPS bonds offer the same 9% loss, though stretched out over 30 years.</p><p><blockquote>今天的问题是，TIPS——就像债券市场上的几乎所有东西一样——看起来非常昂贵。如果你今天购买，大多数建议已经锁定了购买力的实际损失。例如，如果你购买5年期TIPS债券并持有5年，你最终会损失9%的购买力。30年期TIPS债券的损失同样为9%，尽管期限超过30年。</blockquote></p><p> It’s not very compelling. And it shows the risks that the government’s policy responses have created for those in retirement and near it.</p><p><blockquote>这不是很引人注目。它还显示了政府的政策应对给退休和接近退休年龄的人带来的风险。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Worried about inflation? Here’s how investments did in the 1970s<blockquote>担心通货膨胀？以下是20世纪70年代的投资表现</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWorried about inflation? Here’s how investments did in the 1970s<blockquote>担心通货膨胀？以下是20世纪70年代的投资表现</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-20 11:29</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>In the 1990s movie The Shipping News, an old newspaperman explains to Kevin Spacey how to cover the news. If there is a storm visible anywhere, he explains, you write “Storm threatens the town,” even if the storm is nowhere near and is unlikely to hit. If—as expected—the storm never hits, you just write the follow up: “Town spared by storm.”</p><p><blockquote>在20世纪90年代的电影《航运新闻》中，一位老记者向凯文·史派西解释如何报道新闻。他解释说，如果任何地方都有可见的风暴，你就会写“风暴威胁着城镇”，即使风暴不在附近，也不太可能来袭。如果——正如预期的那样——风暴从未袭击，你只需写下后续内容：“城镇幸免于风暴。”</blockquote></p><p> Readers may be excused for thinking something similar about the latest stories about looming, threatening, surging, terrifying inflation. Yes, the inflation forecasts were surging months ago, and hit 8-year highs. Had they continued there would be grounds to worry. But they haven’t continued. On the contrary, they’ve been falling for two months. The bond market’s 5-year inflation forecast is now lower than it was in mid-March. The market sees five-year inflation running at around 2.6%. That’s higher than we’ve been used to for a decade, but it’s nothing to cause any significant alarm.</p><p><blockquote>读者可能会对最近关于迫在眉睫、威胁、飙升、可怕的通货膨胀的故事有类似的想法。是的，几个月前通胀预测飙升，并创下8年来的新高。如果他们继续下去，就有理由担心。但他们没有继续。相反，他们已经下跌了两个月。债券市场的5年通胀预期现在低于3月中旬。市场预计五年通胀率约为2.6%。这比我们十年来所习惯的要高，但这并没有引起任何重大恐慌。</blockquote></p><p> That can change, of course. Maybe it will. We’ll see.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这种情况可能会改变。也许会。我们走着瞧。</blockquote></p><p> But with all this talk I got to thinking about the obvious question. If serious inflation really does hit, what can we do about it? How can we protect our investments?</p><p><blockquote>但是通过这些谈话，我开始思考一个显而易见的问题。如果严重的通货膨胀真的来袭，我们能做些什么呢？我们如何保护我们的投资？</blockquote></p><p> That’s an especially key question for today’s retirees and those expecting to retire soon. When we’re older we’re generally advised to keep most of our money in more “conservative” investments, meaning things like bonds, that involve less risk. Someone in their 20s or 30s may not worry unduly if their retirement savings plunge 30% in a market rout or an inflationary spiral. For someone in their 60s, let alone older, that can become a major financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>对于今天的退休人员和那些预计很快退休的人来说，这是一个特别关键的问题。当我们长大后，通常建议我们将大部分资金投资于更“保守”的投资，即债券等风险较小的投资。如果20多岁或30多岁的人的退休储蓄在市场暴跌或通胀螺旋中暴跌30%，他们可能不会过度担心。对于60多岁的人来说，更不用说老年人了，这可能会成为一场重大的财务危机。</blockquote></p><p> So I went back and dug up the information from the last, infamous inflationary spiral in the 1970s, when consumer price inflation often topped 10% a year. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus pointed out that no one ever walks through the same stream twice, because the second time it’s not the same stream, and we’re not the same person. Everything changes. There is no guarantee the next inflationary boom, even if it happens, will look anything like the last one — any more than we should assume that it will be accompanied by outbreaks of disco music and flared jeans.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我回去挖掘了20世纪70年代上一次臭名昭著的通胀螺旋的信息，当时消费者价格通胀经常超过每年10%。希腊哲学家赫拉克利特指出，没有人会两次走过同一条小溪，因为第二次就不是同一条小溪了，我们也不是同一个人了。一切都变了。不能保证下一次通胀繁荣，即使发生了，看起来也会像上一次一样——就像我们不应该假设它会伴随着迪斯科音乐和喇叭牛仔裤的爆发一样。</blockquote></p><p> Nonetheless the chart above shows the total returns, after adjusting for inflation, of various asset classes from December 1971 to December 1981. (I used those dates because the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, starts their data series then.) The data on energy stocks came from data compiled by professor Ken French at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，上图显示了1971年12月至1981年12月各种资产类别经通胀调整后的总回报。（我使用这些日期是因为全国房地产投资信托协会（NAREIT）在那时开始他们的数据系列。）能源股的数据来自达特茅斯学院塔克商学院肯·弗伦奇教授汇编的数据。</blockquote></p><p> This is what happened to your purchasing power if you invested in these assets and hung on for 10 years. (I’ve excluded gold, which is a different story.)</p><p><blockquote>如果你投资这些资产并坚持10年，你的购买力就会发生这种情况。（我已经排除了黄金，这是一个不同的故事。）</blockquote></p><p> The key standout is that you really didn’t want to own Treasury bonds. The near 40% loss of purchasing power over 10 years is somewhat notional—it is derived from the compound annual returns on 10 Year Treasurys compiled by New York University’s Stern School of Business, divided by the consumer-price index—but tells a story nonetheless. (In Great Britain, where inflation was even worse, government bonds during the 1970s became known as “certificates of confiscation.” Ouch.)</p><p><blockquote>关键的突出之处在于，你真的不想拥有国债。10年内购买力损失近40%在某种程度上是名义上的——它来自纽约大学斯特恩商学院编制的10年期美国国债的复合年回报率除以消费者价格指数——但仍然讲述了一个故事。（在通货膨胀更严重的英国，20世纪70年代的政府债券被称为“没收证书”。哎哟。）</blockquote></p><p> Holding them cost you money. Lots of it.</p><p><blockquote>拿着它们要花钱。很多。</blockquote></p><p> You could argue that the danger today is even greater, simply because the yields on long-term Treasury bonds are so low. Federal Reserve quantitative easing, bond buying, and zero interest-rate policies have left Treasury yields at their lowest on record—which means the turns would be a disaster if inflation reared its head.</p><p><blockquote>你可能会说，今天的危险甚至更大，仅仅是因为长期国债的收益率如此之低。美联储的量化宽松、债券购买和零利率政策使美国国债收益率处于有记录以来的最低水平——这意味着如果通胀抬头，这将是一场灾难。</blockquote></p><p> Corporate bonds and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;were also terrible investments. It’s worth remembering that these are real term losses over a decade, which means investors didn’t just lose a lot of money—they also lost a lot of time.</p><p><blockquote>公司债券和标普500也是糟糕的投资。值得记住的是，这些是十年来的实际定期损失，这意味着投资者不仅损失了很多钱，还损失了很多时间。</blockquote></p><p> Utility stocks weren’t great, but they held up better. And Treasury bills—short-term paper—did better still. But once again you were going backward when you needed to be going forwards.</p><p><blockquote>公用事业股表现不佳，但表现较好。短期票据——国库券——表现更好。但是当你需要前进的时候，你又一次倒退了。</blockquote></p><p> No one who remembers the 1970s will be surprised that energy companies boomed. Less well-remembered, maybe, is that REITs also did pretty well. These numbers, incidentally, represented property-owning REITs and excluded mortgage REITs, which own loans.</p><p><blockquote>任何记得20世纪70年代的人都不会对能源公司的蓬勃发展感到惊讶。也许不太为人所知的是，房地产投资信托基金的表现也相当不错。顺便说一句，这些数字代表拥有财产的房地产投资信托基金，不包括拥有贷款的抵押房地产投资信托基金。</blockquote></p><p> But there are two caveats to this. The first is that of course energy stocks did well, because a key driver of inflation in the 1970s was the rise of OPEC and two oil embargoes it imposed on the West for political reasons. Cue Heraclitus. There is no particular reason to assume that the next inflationary surge will be the same.</p><p><blockquote>但对此有两个警告。首先，能源股当然表现良好，因为20世纪70年代通胀的一个关键驱动因素是欧佩克的崛起及其出于政治原因对西方实施的两次石油禁运。提示赫拉克利特。没有特别的理由假设下一次通胀飙升会是一样的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second caveat is that although REITs ended up doing well, they were volatile along the way. In particular, REIT prices collapsed in the OPEC-driven recession of 1972-4. And according to FactSet, U.S. REITs today already look pretty expensive on some measures. For instance it reckons that the forecast dividend yield on the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (a reasonable benchmark for the industry) is just 2.9% — by far the lowest since it was launched in 2004. Looking through NAREIT data, I can’t find a moment since 1971 when the overall yield on REITs was this low. During the real estate bubble in 2007, incidentally, the yield bottomed out no lower than 3.6%</p><p><blockquote>第二个警告是，尽管房地产投资信托基金最终表现良好，但一路上波动较大。特别是，房地产投资信托基金价格在1972-1974年欧佩克引发的经济衰退中暴跌。根据FactSet的数据，从某些指标来看，如今的美国房地产投资信托基金看起来已经相当昂贵。例如，它估计Vanguard Real Estate ETF（该行业的合理基准）的预测股息收益率仅为2.9%，是自2004年推出以来的最低水平。翻阅NAREIT数据，自1971年以来，我找不到REITs整体收益率如此之低的时刻。2007年房地产泡沫期间，顺带一提，收益率见底不低于3.6%</blockquote></p><p> So it may be that REITs offer less inflation protection today than we would hope.</p><p><blockquote>因此，如今房地产投资信托基金提供的通胀保护可能比我们希望的要少。</blockquote></p><p> One key difference in the 1970s is that there were no “inflation-protected” Treasury bonds to keep investors protected. So-called TIPS are in theory almost the perfect investment for retirees. They are issued by the U.S. government and their coupons are safe against default. Meanwhile their coupons effectively adjust to reflect changes in consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>20世纪70年代的一个关键区别是，没有“通胀保值”国债来保护投资者。理论上，所谓的小费几乎是退休人员的完美投资。它们由美国政府发行，其优惠券不会违约。与此同时，他们的优惠券有效地调整以反映消费价格的变化。</blockquote></p><p> The problem today is that TIPS—like almost everything else in the bond market—look incredibly expensive. Most TIPS already lock in an actual loss of purchasing power if you buy them today. For example if you buy 5 year TIPS bonds and hold them for 5 years you’ll end up losing 9% of your purchasing power. And 30-year TIPS bonds offer the same 9% loss, though stretched out over 30 years.</p><p><blockquote>今天的问题是，TIPS——就像债券市场上的几乎所有东西一样——看起来非常昂贵。如果你今天购买，大多数建议已经锁定了购买力的实际损失。例如，如果你购买5年期TIPS债券并持有5年，你最终会损失9%的购买力。30年期TIPS债券的损失同样为9%，尽管期限超过30年。</blockquote></p><p> It’s not very compelling. And it shows the risks that the government’s policy responses have created for those in retirement and near it.</p><p><blockquote>这不是很引人注目。它还显示了政府的政策应对给退休和接近退休年龄的人带来的风险。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/worried-about-inflation-heres-how-investments-did-in-the-1970s-11626658251?siteid=yhoof2\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","XOM":"埃克森美孚"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/worried-about-inflation-heres-how-investments-did-in-the-1970s-11626658251?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1129846769","content_text":"In the 1990s movie The Shipping News, an old newspaperman explains to Kevin Spacey how to cover the news. If there is a storm visible anywhere, he explains, you write “Storm threatens the town,” even if the storm is nowhere near and is unlikely to hit. If—as expected—the storm never hits, you just write the follow up: “Town spared by storm.”\nReaders may be excused for thinking something similar about the latest stories about looming, threatening, surging, terrifying inflation. Yes, the inflation forecasts were surging months ago, and hit 8-year highs. Had they continued there would be grounds to worry. But they haven’t continued. On the contrary, they’ve been falling for two months. The bond market’s 5-year inflation forecast is now lower than it was in mid-March. The market sees five-year inflation running at around 2.6%. That’s higher than we’ve been used to for a decade, but it’s nothing to cause any significant alarm.\nThat can change, of course. Maybe it will. We’ll see.\nBut with all this talk I got to thinking about the obvious question. If serious inflation really does hit, what can we do about it? How can we protect our investments?\nThat’s an especially key question for today’s retirees and those expecting to retire soon. When we’re older we’re generally advised to keep most of our money in more “conservative” investments, meaning things like bonds, that involve less risk. Someone in their 20s or 30s may not worry unduly if their retirement savings plunge 30% in a market rout or an inflationary spiral. For someone in their 60s, let alone older, that can become a major financial crisis.\nSo I went back and dug up the information from the last, infamous inflationary spiral in the 1970s, when consumer price inflation often topped 10% a year. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus pointed out that no one ever walks through the same stream twice, because the second time it’s not the same stream, and we’re not the same person. Everything changes. There is no guarantee the next inflationary boom, even if it happens, will look anything like the last one — any more than we should assume that it will be accompanied by outbreaks of disco music and flared jeans.\nNonetheless the chart above shows the total returns, after adjusting for inflation, of various asset classes from December 1971 to December 1981. (I used those dates because the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, starts their data series then.) The data on energy stocks came from data compiled by professor Ken French at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business.\nThis is what happened to your purchasing power if you invested in these assets and hung on for 10 years. (I’ve excluded gold, which is a different story.)\nThe key standout is that you really didn’t want to own Treasury bonds. The near 40% loss of purchasing power over 10 years is somewhat notional—it is derived from the compound annual returns on 10 Year Treasurys compiled by New York University’s Stern School of Business, divided by the consumer-price index—but tells a story nonetheless. (In Great Britain, where inflation was even worse, government bonds during the 1970s became known as “certificates of confiscation.” Ouch.)\nHolding them cost you money. Lots of it.\nYou could argue that the danger today is even greater, simply because the yields on long-term Treasury bonds are so low. Federal Reserve quantitative easing, bond buying, and zero interest-rate policies have left Treasury yields at their lowest on record—which means the turns would be a disaster if inflation reared its head.\nCorporate bonds and the S&P 500 were also terrible investments. It’s worth remembering that these are real term losses over a decade, which means investors didn’t just lose a lot of money—they also lost a lot of time.\nUtility stocks weren’t great, but they held up better. And Treasury bills—short-term paper—did better still. But once again you were going backward when you needed to be going forwards.\nNo one who remembers the 1970s will be surprised that energy companies boomed. Less well-remembered, maybe, is that REITs also did pretty well. These numbers, incidentally, represented property-owning REITs and excluded mortgage REITs, which own loans.\nBut there are two caveats to this. The first is that of course energy stocks did well, because a key driver of inflation in the 1970s was the rise of OPEC and two oil embargoes it imposed on the West for political reasons. Cue Heraclitus. There is no particular reason to assume that the next inflationary surge will be the same.\nThe second caveat is that although REITs ended up doing well, they were volatile along the way. In particular, REIT prices collapsed in the OPEC-driven recession of 1972-4. And according to FactSet, U.S. REITs today already look pretty expensive on some measures. For instance it reckons that the forecast dividend yield on the Vanguard Real Estate ETF (a reasonable benchmark for the industry) is just 2.9% — by far the lowest since it was launched in 2004. Looking through NAREIT data, I can’t find a moment since 1971 when the overall yield on REITs was this low. During the real estate bubble in 2007, incidentally, the yield bottomed out no lower than 3.6%\nSo it may be that REITs offer less inflation protection today than we would hope.\nOne key difference in the 1970s is that there were no “inflation-protected” Treasury bonds to keep investors protected. So-called TIPS are in theory almost the perfect investment for retirees. They are issued by the U.S. government and their coupons are safe against default. Meanwhile their coupons effectively adjust to reflect changes in consumer prices.\nThe problem today is that TIPS—like almost everything else in the bond market—look incredibly expensive. Most TIPS already lock in an actual loss of purchasing power if you buy them today. For example if you buy 5 year TIPS bonds and hold them for 5 years you’ll end up losing 9% of your purchasing power. And 30-year TIPS bonds offer the same 9% loss, though stretched out over 30 years.\nIt’s not very compelling. And it shows the risks that the government’s policy responses have created for those in retirement and near it.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"XOM":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2328,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171418335,"gmtCreate":1626755660127,"gmtModify":1633771318948,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171418335","repostId":"2152666568","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2748,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171411873,"gmtCreate":1626755621692,"gmtModify":1633771319740,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171411873","repostId":"1199590100","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171413736,"gmtCreate":1626755600325,"gmtModify":1633771320208,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171413736","repostId":"1166035606","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2167,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171413905,"gmtCreate":1626755568407,"gmtModify":1633771320820,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171413905","repostId":"2152652683","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2284,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173568594,"gmtCreate":1626670940618,"gmtModify":1633925040739,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173568594","repostId":"2152633674","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":889,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173568899,"gmtCreate":1626670918011,"gmtModify":1633925040981,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173568899","repostId":"1131628595","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131628595","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626665643,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1131628595?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 11:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investors are very scared even with stocks near record highs<blockquote>即使股市接近历史新高，投资者也非常害怕</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131628595","media":"CNN","summary":"New York The Dow and S&P 500 are both up about 15% in 2021 and are each about a percent away from their all-time highs. But as Friday's market sell-off showed, investors remain extremely nervous about the market.The CNN Business Fear & Greed Index, which looks at seven different measures of market sentiment, is showing signs of Extreme Fear. Four of the seven indicators are in bearish territory.Demand for safe haven bonds is picking up. That's pushed the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield all the ","content":"<p>New York (CNN Business)The Dow and S&amp;P 500 are both up about 15% in 2021 and are each about a percent away from their all-time highs. But as Friday's market sell-off showed, investors remain extremely nervous about the market.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）道琼斯指数和标普500指数在2021年均上涨了约15%，距离历史高点均相差约1%。但正如周五的市场抛售所显示的那样，投资者对市场仍极度紧张。</blockquote></p><p> The CNN Business Fear &amp; Greed Index, which looks at seven different measures of market sentiment, is showing signs of Extreme Fear. Four of the seven indicators are in bearish territory.</p><p><blockquote>CNN商业恐惧与贪婪指数着眼于七种不同的市场情绪指标，显示出极度恐惧的迹象。七个指标中有四个处于看跌区域。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for safe haven bonds is picking up. That's pushed the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield all the way down to 1.3%, compared to a level above 1.75% as recently as March.</p><p><blockquote>对避险债券的需求正在回升。这使得基准10年期国债收益率一路跌至1.3%，而3月份的水平还高于1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are also buying more put options, contracts that give them the right to sell stocks and other assets at a specific price.</p><p><blockquote>投资者也在购买更多的看跌期权，即赋予他们以特定价格出售股票和其他资产的权利的合约。</blockquote></p><p> The number of companies with stocks hitting new 52-week lows versus highs is increasing, and trading volume for stocks that are falling is also outpacing volume for stocks that are climbing. But the solid gains for the FAANGs of Big Tech have helped lift the broader market in spite of this.</p><p><blockquote>股票创下52周新低与高点的公司数量正在增加，下跌股票的交易量也超过了上涨股票的交易量。但尽管如此，大型科技公司FAANG的稳健上涨还是帮助提振了大盘。</blockquote></p><p> A little bit of fear is healthy</p><p><blockquote>一点点恐惧是健康的</blockquote></p><p> There are several legitimate reasons for investors to be worried.</p><p><blockquote>投资者有几个合理的理由感到担忧。</blockquote></p><p> Even though the economy and corporate earnings have rebounded sharply from their pandemic era lows of last spring and early summer, worries persist about the Delta variant and the fact that many Americans remain unvaccinated.</p><p><blockquote>尽管经济和企业盈利已从去年春天和初夏的大流行时代低点大幅反弹，但对德尔塔变异毒株和许多美国人仍未接种疫苗的担忧依然存在。</blockquote></p><p> There are also conflicting signs about the recovery. The US government reported a sharp rebound in retail sales for June on Friday but that was complicated by another report showing a sizable drop in consumer confidence.</p><p><blockquote>关于复苏，也有相互矛盾的迹象。美国政府周五公布6月份零售额大幅反弹，但另一份显示消费者信心大幅下降的报告使情况变得复杂。</blockquote></p><p> The persistent rise in the prices of many consumer goods is raising inflation alarm bells as well.</p><p><blockquote>许多消费品价格的持续上涨也敲响了通货膨胀的警钟。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some market experts believe that the skepticism is healthy.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些市场专家认为，这种怀疑是健康的。</blockquote></p><p> There's a saying on Wall Street that stocks climb a wall of worry, meaning that it's a good sign if the market is going up even though there are legitimate concerns. The absence of such worry can often lead to excessive speculation and market bubbles.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街有一种说法，股票会爬上担忧之墙，这意味着如果市场正在上涨，即使存在合理的担忧，这也是一个好兆头。缺乏这种担忧往往会导致过度投机和市场泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> \"It's not abnormal after you have a jolt in the economy and market to have lingering fear. It takes a long time for investors to become comfortable with advances in stocks coming off the bottom,\" said Kelly Bogdanova, vice president of the portfolio advisory group with RBC Wealth Management.</p><p><blockquote>投资组合咨询副总裁凯利·博格丹诺娃(Kelly Bogdanova)表示：“在经济和市场出现震荡后，心有余悸并不罕见。投资者需要很长时间才能适应股市走出谷底的上涨。”加拿大皇家银行财富管理集团。</blockquote></p><p> \"I'd rather see some fear than people being complacent. Investors being nervous doesn't trouble me,\" she added.</p><p><blockquote>“我宁愿看到一些恐惧，也不愿看到人们沾沾自喜。投资者的紧张不会困扰我，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Bumpier ride for stocks but path of least resistance is up</p><p><blockquote>股市走势更加坎坷，但阻力最小的路径正在上涨</blockquote></p><p> That being said, investors may have to brace themselves for more volatility in the coming months.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，投资者可能必须为未来几个月的更大波动做好准备。</blockquote></p><p> The so-called easy money in stocks may have already been made during this year's stock surge. Bogdanova said that \"the market is now entering a transition period\" and instead of \"explosive growth, it will be a two steps forward and one step back\" type of environment.</p><p><blockquote>股票所谓的轻松赚钱，可能在今年的股票大涨中就已经赚到了。波格丹诺娃表示，“市场现在正在进入一个过渡期”，而不是“爆炸性增长，这将是一个前进两步，后退一步”类型的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Inflation concerns and skittishness about how the Federal Reserve will react to headlines about higher prices are likely to stick around too. But the recent slide in bond yields might actually be an encouraging sign for investors.</p><p><blockquote>通胀担忧以及对美联储将如何应对物价上涨头条新闻的不安也可能持续存在。但最近债券收益率的下滑实际上对投资者来说可能是一个令人鼓舞的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> If the bond market was really that afraid of inflation, yields would be rising instead of falling. Inflation typically leads to much higher interest rates, not the other way around.</p><p><blockquote>如果债券市场真的那么害怕通胀，收益率就会上升而不是下降。通货膨胀通常会导致利率高得多，而不是相反。</blockquote></p><p> So it would appear that bond investors agree with Fed chair Jerome Powell, who has repeatedly described the current bout of inflation as \"transitory.\"</p><p><blockquote>因此，债券投资者似乎同意美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的观点，他多次将当前的通胀描述为“暂时的”。</blockquote></p><p> \"The bond market is giving the message that inflation concerns are not permanent,\" said Steve Wyett, chief investment strategist with BOK Financial.</p><p><blockquote>BOK Financial首席投资策略师Steve Wyett表示：“债券市场传达的信息是，通胀担忧不是永久性的。”</blockquote></p><p> There's also the fact that corporate earnings are expected to keep climbing. That bodes well for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>还有一个事实是，企业盈利预计将继续攀升。这对股市来说是个好兆头。</blockquote></p><p> According to FactSet, analysts expect corporate profits to rise 24% from a year ago in the third quarter and increase nearly 19% in the fourth quarter. Growth is expected to dip somewhat next year, but analysts are still forecasting a healthy 11% increase in earnings for 2022.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，分析师预计第三季度企业利润将同比增长24%，第四季度将增长近19%。预计明年的增长将有所下降，但分析师仍预测2022年盈利将健康增长11%。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, profits are climbing even as many companies are raising wages to entice people back into the work force.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，尽管许多公司正在提高工资以吸引人们重返劳动力市场，但利润仍在攀升。</blockquote></p><p> \"There is room for companies to pay more for labor and not hurt their margins,\" Wyett said. \"We should see continued earnings growth. The stage is set to go from a stimulus led recovery to one with private sector expansion.\"</p><p><blockquote>怀亚特说：“公司有空间在不损害利润的情况下支付更多劳动力费用。”“我们应该会看到盈利持续增长。这个阶段将从刺激主导的复苏转向私营部门扩张的复苏。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investors are very scared even with stocks near record highs<blockquote>即使股市接近历史新高，投资者也非常害怕</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestors are very scared even with stocks near record highs<blockquote>即使股市接近历史新高，投资者也非常害怕</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 11:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)The Dow and S&amp;P 500 are both up about 15% in 2021 and are each about a percent away from their all-time highs. But as Friday's market sell-off showed, investors remain extremely nervous about the market.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN Business）道琼斯指数和标普500指数在2021年均上涨了约15%，距离历史高点均相差约1%。但正如周五的市场抛售所显示的那样，投资者对市场仍极度紧张。</blockquote></p><p> The CNN Business Fear &amp; Greed Index, which looks at seven different measures of market sentiment, is showing signs of Extreme Fear. Four of the seven indicators are in bearish territory.</p><p><blockquote>CNN商业恐惧与贪婪指数着眼于七种不同的市场情绪指标，显示出极度恐惧的迹象。七个指标中有四个处于看跌区域。</blockquote></p><p> Demand for safe haven bonds is picking up. That's pushed the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield all the way down to 1.3%, compared to a level above 1.75% as recently as March.</p><p><blockquote>对避险债券的需求正在回升。这使得基准10年期国债收益率一路跌至1.3%，而3月份的水平还高于1.75%。</blockquote></p><p> Investors are also buying more put options, contracts that give them the right to sell stocks and other assets at a specific price.</p><p><blockquote>投资者也在购买更多的看跌期权，即赋予他们以特定价格出售股票和其他资产的权利的合约。</blockquote></p><p> The number of companies with stocks hitting new 52-week lows versus highs is increasing, and trading volume for stocks that are falling is also outpacing volume for stocks that are climbing. But the solid gains for the FAANGs of Big Tech have helped lift the broader market in spite of this.</p><p><blockquote>股票创下52周新低与高点的公司数量正在增加，下跌股票的交易量也超过了上涨股票的交易量。但尽管如此，大型科技公司FAANG的稳健上涨还是帮助提振了大盘。</blockquote></p><p> A little bit of fear is healthy</p><p><blockquote>一点点恐惧是健康的</blockquote></p><p> There are several legitimate reasons for investors to be worried.</p><p><blockquote>投资者有几个合理的理由感到担忧。</blockquote></p><p> Even though the economy and corporate earnings have rebounded sharply from their pandemic era lows of last spring and early summer, worries persist about the Delta variant and the fact that many Americans remain unvaccinated.</p><p><blockquote>尽管经济和企业盈利已从去年春天和初夏的大流行时代低点大幅反弹，但对德尔塔变异毒株和许多美国人仍未接种疫苗的担忧依然存在。</blockquote></p><p> There are also conflicting signs about the recovery. The US government reported a sharp rebound in retail sales for June on Friday but that was complicated by another report showing a sizable drop in consumer confidence.</p><p><blockquote>关于复苏，也有相互矛盾的迹象。美国政府周五公布6月份零售额大幅反弹，但另一份显示消费者信心大幅下降的报告使情况变得复杂。</blockquote></p><p> The persistent rise in the prices of many consumer goods is raising inflation alarm bells as well.</p><p><blockquote>许多消费品价格的持续上涨也敲响了通货膨胀的警钟。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some market experts believe that the skepticism is healthy.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些市场专家认为，这种怀疑是健康的。</blockquote></p><p> There's a saying on Wall Street that stocks climb a wall of worry, meaning that it's a good sign if the market is going up even though there are legitimate concerns. The absence of such worry can often lead to excessive speculation and market bubbles.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街有一种说法，股票会爬上担忧之墙，这意味着如果市场正在上涨，即使存在合理的担忧，这也是一个好兆头。缺乏这种担忧往往会导致过度投机和市场泡沫。</blockquote></p><p> \"It's not abnormal after you have a jolt in the economy and market to have lingering fear. It takes a long time for investors to become comfortable with advances in stocks coming off the bottom,\" said Kelly Bogdanova, vice president of the portfolio advisory group with RBC Wealth Management.</p><p><blockquote>投资组合咨询副总裁凯利·博格丹诺娃(Kelly Bogdanova)表示：“在经济和市场出现震荡后，心有余悸并不罕见。投资者需要很长时间才能适应股市走出谷底的上涨。”加拿大皇家银行财富管理集团。</blockquote></p><p> \"I'd rather see some fear than people being complacent. Investors being nervous doesn't trouble me,\" she added.</p><p><blockquote>“我宁愿看到一些恐惧，也不愿看到人们沾沾自喜。投资者的紧张不会困扰我，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Bumpier ride for stocks but path of least resistance is up</p><p><blockquote>股市走势更加坎坷，但阻力最小的路径正在上涨</blockquote></p><p> That being said, investors may have to brace themselves for more volatility in the coming months.</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，投资者可能必须为未来几个月的更大波动做好准备。</blockquote></p><p> The so-called easy money in stocks may have already been made during this year's stock surge. Bogdanova said that \"the market is now entering a transition period\" and instead of \"explosive growth, it will be a two steps forward and one step back\" type of environment.</p><p><blockquote>股票所谓的轻松赚钱，可能在今年的股票大涨中就已经赚到了。波格丹诺娃表示，“市场现在正在进入一个过渡期”，而不是“爆炸性增长，这将是一个前进两步，后退一步”类型的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Inflation concerns and skittishness about how the Federal Reserve will react to headlines about higher prices are likely to stick around too. But the recent slide in bond yields might actually be an encouraging sign for investors.</p><p><blockquote>通胀担忧以及对美联储将如何应对物价上涨头条新闻的不安也可能持续存在。但最近债券收益率的下滑实际上对投资者来说可能是一个令人鼓舞的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> If the bond market was really that afraid of inflation, yields would be rising instead of falling. Inflation typically leads to much higher interest rates, not the other way around.</p><p><blockquote>如果债券市场真的那么害怕通胀，收益率就会上升而不是下降。通货膨胀通常会导致利率高得多，而不是相反。</blockquote></p><p> So it would appear that bond investors agree with Fed chair Jerome Powell, who has repeatedly described the current bout of inflation as \"transitory.\"</p><p><blockquote>因此，债券投资者似乎同意美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的观点，他多次将当前的通胀描述为“暂时的”。</blockquote></p><p> \"The bond market is giving the message that inflation concerns are not permanent,\" said Steve Wyett, chief investment strategist with BOK Financial.</p><p><blockquote>BOK Financial首席投资策略师Steve Wyett表示：“债券市场传达的信息是，通胀担忧不是永久性的。”</blockquote></p><p> There's also the fact that corporate earnings are expected to keep climbing. That bodes well for stocks.</p><p><blockquote>还有一个事实是，企业盈利预计将继续攀升。这对股市来说是个好兆头。</blockquote></p><p> According to FactSet, analysts expect corporate profits to rise 24% from a year ago in the third quarter and increase nearly 19% in the fourth quarter. Growth is expected to dip somewhat next year, but analysts are still forecasting a healthy 11% increase in earnings for 2022.</p><p><blockquote>FactSet的数据显示，分析师预计第三季度企业利润将同比增长24%，第四季度将增长近19%。预计明年的增长将有所下降，但分析师仍预测2022年盈利将健康增长11%。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, profits are climbing even as many companies are raising wages to entice people back into the work force.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，尽管许多公司正在提高工资以吸引人们重返劳动力市场，但利润仍在攀升。</blockquote></p><p> \"There is room for companies to pay more for labor and not hurt their margins,\" Wyett said. \"We should see continued earnings growth. The stage is set to go from a stimulus led recovery to one with private sector expansion.\"</p><p><blockquote>怀亚特说：“公司有空间在不损害利润的情况下支付更多劳动力费用。”“我们应该会看到盈利持续增长。这个阶段将从刺激主导的复苏转向私营部门扩张的复苏。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/17/investing/stocks-fear-greed/index.html\">CNN</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/17/investing/stocks-fear-greed/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131628595","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)The Dow and S&P 500 are both up about 15% in 2021 and are each about a percent away from their all-time highs. But as Friday's market sell-off showed, investors remain extremely nervous about the market.\nThe CNN Business Fear & Greed Index, which looks at seven different measures of market sentiment, is showing signs of Extreme Fear. Four of the seven indicators are in bearish territory.\nDemand for safe haven bonds is picking up. That's pushed the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield all the way down to 1.3%, compared to a level above 1.75% as recently as March.\nInvestors are also buying more put options, contracts that give them the right to sell stocks and other assets at a specific price.\nThe number of companies with stocks hitting new 52-week lows versus highs is increasing, and trading volume for stocks that are falling is also outpacing volume for stocks that are climbing. But the solid gains for the FAANGs of Big Tech have helped lift the broader market in spite of this.\nA little bit of fear is healthy\nThere are several legitimate reasons for investors to be worried.\nEven though the economy and corporate earnings have rebounded sharply from their pandemic era lows of last spring and early summer, worries persist about the Delta variant and the fact that many Americans remain unvaccinated.\nThere are also conflicting signs about the recovery. The US government reported a sharp rebound in retail sales for June on Friday but that was complicated by another report showing a sizable drop in consumer confidence.\nThe persistent rise in the prices of many consumer goods is raising inflation alarm bells as well.\nStill, some market experts believe that the skepticism is healthy.\nThere's a saying on Wall Street that stocks climb a wall of worry, meaning that it's a good sign if the market is going up even though there are legitimate concerns. The absence of such worry can often lead to excessive speculation and market bubbles.\n\"It's not abnormal after you have a jolt in the economy and market to have lingering fear. It takes a long time for investors to become comfortable with advances in stocks coming off the bottom,\" said Kelly Bogdanova, vice president of the portfolio advisory group with RBC Wealth Management.\n\"I'd rather see some fear than people being complacent. Investors being nervous doesn't trouble me,\" she added.\nBumpier ride for stocks but path of least resistance is up\nThat being said, investors may have to brace themselves for more volatility in the coming months.\nThe so-called easy money in stocks may have already been made during this year's stock surge. Bogdanova said that \"the market is now entering a transition period\" and instead of \"explosive growth, it will be a two steps forward and one step back\" type of environment.\nInflation concerns and skittishness about how the Federal Reserve will react to headlines about higher prices are likely to stick around too. But the recent slide in bond yields might actually be an encouraging sign for investors.\nIf the bond market was really that afraid of inflation, yields would be rising instead of falling. Inflation typically leads to much higher interest rates, not the other way around.\nSo it would appear that bond investors agree with Fed chair Jerome Powell, who has repeatedly described the current bout of inflation as \"transitory.\"\n\"The bond market is giving the message that inflation concerns are not permanent,\" said Steve Wyett, chief investment strategist with BOK Financial.\nThere's also the fact that corporate earnings are expected to keep climbing. That bodes well for stocks.\nAccording to FactSet, analysts expect corporate profits to rise 24% from a year ago in the third quarter and increase nearly 19% in the fourth quarter. Growth is expected to dip somewhat next year, but analysts are still forecasting a healthy 11% increase in earnings for 2022.\nWhat's more, profits are climbing even as many companies are raising wages to entice people back into the work force.\n\"There is room for companies to pay more for labor and not hurt their margins,\" Wyett said. \"We should see continued earnings growth. The stage is set to go from a stimulus led recovery to one with private sector expansion.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":687,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173561425,"gmtCreate":1626670848067,"gmtModify":1633925041665,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173561425","repostId":"1101408121","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101408121","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626666252,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1101408121?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 11:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Big banks are getting even bigger, raising alarms in Washington<blockquote>大银行规模越来越大，在华盛顿敲响了警钟</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101408121","media":"CNN","summary":"New York (CNN Business)Banks have been on a shopping spree for the past year — and that's raising so","content":"<p>New York (CNN Business)Banks have been on a shopping spree for the past year — and that's raising some alarm bells in Washington.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN商业）银行在过去的一年里一直在疯狂购物，这在华盛顿敲响了一些警钟。</blockquote></p><p> Senators Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown have been critical of the top banks for their dealmaking, citing concerns that the spate of mergers will hurt average consumers and make it tougher for smaller community banks to remain competitive.</p><p><blockquote>参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦和谢罗德·布朗一直批评顶级银行的交易行为，理由是担心大量合并将伤害普通消费者，并使小型社区银行更难保持竞争力。</blockquote></p><p> There were 52 banks with more than $50 billion in assets at the end of the first quarter of 2021, up from 39 banks at the end of 2017, according to data from S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence.</p><p><blockquote>标普全球市场情报公司的数据显示，截至2021年第一季度末，资产超过500亿美元的银行有52家，高于2017年底的39家。</blockquote></p><p> This year alone, PNC (PNC) bought BBVA USA Bancshares, a deal that allowed PNC to become the fifth-largest bank in the United States by assets. And Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) merged with TCF.</p><p><blockquote>仅今年一年，PNC(PNC)就收购了BBVA USA Bancshares，这笔交易使PNC成为美国资产第五大银行。Huntington Bancshares(HBAN)与TCF合并。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, several other regional banking deals announced earlier this year are pending approval, including M&amp;T Bank's (MTB) purchase of People's United (PBCT), the acquisition of Flagstar Bancorp (FBC) by New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) and a merger between Webster Financial (WBS) and Sterling Bancorp (SBT).</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，今年早些时候宣布的其他几项地区银行交易正在等待批准，包括M&amp;T银行(MTB)收购People's United(PBCT)、纽约社区银行(NYCB)收购Flagstar Bancorp(FBC)以及Webster Financial(WBS)和Sterling Bancorp(SBT)之间的合并。</blockquote></p><p> Congress is partly responsible for bank merger bonanza</p><p><blockquote>国会对银行合并热潮负有部分责任</blockquote></p><p> The frenetic pace of bank shotgun weddings is largely a result of changes in financial regulations over the past few years.</p><p><blockquote>银行猎枪婚礼的狂热步伐很大程度上是过去几年金融监管变化的结果。</blockquote></p><p> It's no coincidence that there have been a slew of bank mergers since lawmakers ruled in 2018 that banks had to have $250 billion in assets, and not \"just\" $50 billion, in order to be considered systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) that are subject to more regulations.</p><p><blockquote>自2018年立法者裁定银行必须拥有2500亿美元的资产，而不仅仅是“仅仅”500亿美元，才能被视为具有系统重要性的金融机构(SIFI)以来，发生了大量银行合并，这并非巧合。受到更多监管。</blockquote></p><p> Only a dozen US banks currently are large enough to get a SIFI designation, including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Citigroup (C), Truist (TFC), US Bancorp (USB) and PNC.</p><p><blockquote>目前只有十几家美国银行规模足以获得SIFI称号，包括摩根大通(JPM)、美国银行(BAC)、富国银行(WFC)、花旗集团(C)、Truist(TFC)、US Bancorp(USB)和PNC。</blockquote></p><p> The SIFI change from $50 billion to $250 billion opened the door for many mid-size banks to scoop up rivals without fear that they would suddenly be required to go through more strict and onerous oversight.</p><p><blockquote>SIFI从500亿美元到2500亿美元的变化为许多中型银行打开了收购竞争对手的大门，而不必担心它们会突然被要求接受更严格和繁重的监管。</blockquote></p><p> Banks have took advantage of the change and began pairing up. The reasons for doing so are pretty obvious: Larger institutions can cut costs and improve efficiencies to boost profits.</p><p><blockquote>银行利用了这一变化，开始结对。这样做的原因非常明显：大型机构可以削减成本并提高效率以增加利润。</blockquote></p><p> The pandemic jump-started more deals, too. The Federal Reserve's emergency rate cuts have made it more difficult for banks to make money on loans since interest rates are near zero — and likely to stay there for the foreseeable future.</p><p><blockquote>疫情也引发了更多交易。美联储的紧急降息使银行更难通过贷款赚钱，因为利率接近于零，而且在可预见的未来可能会保持在零水平。</blockquote></p><p> That was evident from the latest quarterly results of top banks that were reported this week. Revenue for the second quarter fell at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi and BNY Mellon (BK) when compared with a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>从本周公布的顶级银行最新季度业绩中可以明显看出这一点。摩根大通、美国银行、花旗和纽约梅隆银行(BK)第二季度收入同比下降。</blockquote></p><p> Changes from DC on the horizon?</p><p><blockquote>DC即将发生变化？</blockquote></p><p> But it's not clear how much longer the bank M&amp;A wave will last. It is worth noting that the most recent changes to bank laws in Washington were accomplished during the Trump administration and with a Republican-controlled Senate.</p><p><blockquote>但目前尚不清楚银行并购潮还会持续多久。值得注意的是，华盛顿最近对银行法的修改是在特朗普政府期间完成的，参议院由共和党控制。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden recently signaled with a sweeping executive order that he intends to scrutinize mergers more closely than his predecessor.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统最近发布了一项全面的行政命令，表示他打算比前任更密切地审查合并。</blockquote></p><p> Warren, along with Democratic Congressman Jesus \"Chuy\" Garcia, also introduced a Bank Merger Review Modernization Act bill in December 2019 that could possibly be reintroduced now that the Democrats have a slim majority in the Senate due to a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Harris.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦和民主党众议员耶稣·“楚伊”·加西亚(Jesus“Chuy”Garcia)还在2019年12月提出了一项银行合并审查现代化法案，由于副总统哈里斯的平局投票，民主党在参议院拥有微弱多数，该法案可能会重新提出。</blockquote></p><p> The goal of the Warren-Garcia legislation is to \"end rubber stamping of bank merger applications.\"</p><p><blockquote>沃伦-加西亚立法的目标是“结束银行合并申请的橡皮图章”。</blockquote></p><p> That's likely to get a sympathetic ear from Brown, the Ohio senator who is chair of the Senate's Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.</p><p><blockquote>这可能会得到俄亥俄州参议员、参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会主席布朗的同情。</blockquote></p><p> Brown grilled Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell Thursday about bank mergers during Powell's appearance before the committee for his semiannual testimony about the economy.</p><p><blockquote>周四，在鲍威尔出席委员会关于经济的半年度证词期间，布朗就银行合并问题质问了美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔。</blockquote></p><p> \"We can't let big banks merge into bigger and bigger megabanks, making it harder for small banks to compete and leaving rural and Black and brown communities behind,\" Brown said in his prepared remarks to Powell.</p><p><blockquote>布朗在给鲍威尔准备好的讲话中表示：“我们不能让大银行合并成越来越大的大型银行，使小银行更难竞争，并将农村、黑人和棕色人种社区抛在后面。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Big banks are getting even bigger, raising alarms in Washington<blockquote>大银行规模越来越大，在华盛顿敲响了警钟</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBig banks are getting even bigger, raising alarms in Washington<blockquote>大银行规模越来越大，在华盛顿敲响了警钟</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 11:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)Banks have been on a shopping spree for the past year — and that's raising some alarm bells in Washington.</p><p><blockquote>纽约（CNN商业）银行在过去的一年里一直在疯狂购物，这在华盛顿敲响了一些警钟。</blockquote></p><p> Senators Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown have been critical of the top banks for their dealmaking, citing concerns that the spate of mergers will hurt average consumers and make it tougher for smaller community banks to remain competitive.</p><p><blockquote>参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦和谢罗德·布朗一直批评顶级银行的交易行为，理由是担心大量合并将伤害普通消费者，并使小型社区银行更难保持竞争力。</blockquote></p><p> There were 52 banks with more than $50 billion in assets at the end of the first quarter of 2021, up from 39 banks at the end of 2017, according to data from S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence.</p><p><blockquote>标普全球市场情报公司的数据显示，截至2021年第一季度末，资产超过500亿美元的银行有52家，高于2017年底的39家。</blockquote></p><p> This year alone, PNC (PNC) bought BBVA USA Bancshares, a deal that allowed PNC to become the fifth-largest bank in the United States by assets. And Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) merged with TCF.</p><p><blockquote>仅今年一年，PNC(PNC)就收购了BBVA USA Bancshares，这笔交易使PNC成为美国资产第五大银行。Huntington Bancshares(HBAN)与TCF合并。</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile, several other regional banking deals announced earlier this year are pending approval, including M&amp;T Bank's (MTB) purchase of People's United (PBCT), the acquisition of Flagstar Bancorp (FBC) by New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) and a merger between Webster Financial (WBS) and Sterling Bancorp (SBT).</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，今年早些时候宣布的其他几项地区银行交易正在等待批准，包括M&amp;T银行(MTB)收购People's United(PBCT)、纽约社区银行(NYCB)收购Flagstar Bancorp(FBC)以及Webster Financial(WBS)和Sterling Bancorp(SBT)之间的合并。</blockquote></p><p> Congress is partly responsible for bank merger bonanza</p><p><blockquote>国会对银行合并热潮负有部分责任</blockquote></p><p> The frenetic pace of bank shotgun weddings is largely a result of changes in financial regulations over the past few years.</p><p><blockquote>银行猎枪婚礼的狂热步伐很大程度上是过去几年金融监管变化的结果。</blockquote></p><p> It's no coincidence that there have been a slew of bank mergers since lawmakers ruled in 2018 that banks had to have $250 billion in assets, and not \"just\" $50 billion, in order to be considered systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) that are subject to more regulations.</p><p><blockquote>自2018年立法者裁定银行必须拥有2500亿美元的资产，而不仅仅是“仅仅”500亿美元，才能被视为具有系统重要性的金融机构(SIFI)以来，发生了大量银行合并，这并非巧合。受到更多监管。</blockquote></p><p> Only a dozen US banks currently are large enough to get a SIFI designation, including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Citigroup (C), Truist (TFC), US Bancorp (USB) and PNC.</p><p><blockquote>目前只有十几家美国银行规模足以获得SIFI称号，包括摩根大通(JPM)、美国银行(BAC)、富国银行(WFC)、花旗集团(C)、Truist(TFC)、US Bancorp(USB)和PNC。</blockquote></p><p> The SIFI change from $50 billion to $250 billion opened the door for many mid-size banks to scoop up rivals without fear that they would suddenly be required to go through more strict and onerous oversight.</p><p><blockquote>SIFI从500亿美元到2500亿美元的变化为许多中型银行打开了收购竞争对手的大门，而不必担心它们会突然被要求接受更严格和繁重的监管。</blockquote></p><p> Banks have took advantage of the change and began pairing up. The reasons for doing so are pretty obvious: Larger institutions can cut costs and improve efficiencies to boost profits.</p><p><blockquote>银行利用了这一变化，开始结对。这样做的原因非常明显：大型机构可以削减成本并提高效率以增加利润。</blockquote></p><p> The pandemic jump-started more deals, too. The Federal Reserve's emergency rate cuts have made it more difficult for banks to make money on loans since interest rates are near zero — and likely to stay there for the foreseeable future.</p><p><blockquote>疫情也引发了更多交易。美联储的紧急降息使银行更难通过贷款赚钱，因为利率接近于零，而且在可预见的未来可能会保持在零水平。</blockquote></p><p> That was evident from the latest quarterly results of top banks that were reported this week. Revenue for the second quarter fell at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi and BNY Mellon (BK) when compared with a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>从本周公布的顶级银行最新季度业绩中可以明显看出这一点。摩根大通、美国银行、花旗和纽约梅隆银行(BK)第二季度收入同比下降。</blockquote></p><p> Changes from DC on the horizon?</p><p><blockquote>DC即将发生变化？</blockquote></p><p> But it's not clear how much longer the bank M&amp;A wave will last. It is worth noting that the most recent changes to bank laws in Washington were accomplished during the Trump administration and with a Republican-controlled Senate.</p><p><blockquote>但目前尚不清楚银行并购潮还会持续多久。值得注意的是，华盛顿最近对银行法的修改是在特朗普政府期间完成的，参议院由共和党控制。</blockquote></p><p> President Biden recently signaled with a sweeping executive order that he intends to scrutinize mergers more closely than his predecessor.</p><p><blockquote>拜登总统最近发布了一项全面的行政命令，表示他打算比前任更密切地审查合并。</blockquote></p><p> Warren, along with Democratic Congressman Jesus \"Chuy\" Garcia, also introduced a Bank Merger Review Modernization Act bill in December 2019 that could possibly be reintroduced now that the Democrats have a slim majority in the Senate due to a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Harris.</p><p><blockquote>沃伦和民主党众议员耶稣·“楚伊”·加西亚(Jesus“Chuy”Garcia)还在2019年12月提出了一项银行合并审查现代化法案，由于副总统哈里斯的平局投票，民主党在参议院拥有微弱多数，该法案可能会重新提出。</blockquote></p><p> The goal of the Warren-Garcia legislation is to \"end rubber stamping of bank merger applications.\"</p><p><blockquote>沃伦-加西亚立法的目标是“结束银行合并申请的橡皮图章”。</blockquote></p><p> That's likely to get a sympathetic ear from Brown, the Ohio senator who is chair of the Senate's Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.</p><p><blockquote>这可能会得到俄亥俄州参议员、参议院银行、住房和城市事务委员会主席布朗的同情。</blockquote></p><p> Brown grilled Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell Thursday about bank mergers during Powell's appearance before the committee for his semiannual testimony about the economy.</p><p><blockquote>周四，在鲍威尔出席委员会关于经济的半年度证词期间，布朗就银行合并问题质问了美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔。</blockquote></p><p> \"We can't let big banks merge into bigger and bigger megabanks, making it harder for small banks to compete and leaving rural and Black and brown communities behind,\" Brown said in his prepared remarks to Powell.</p><p><blockquote>布朗在给鲍威尔准备好的讲话中表示：“我们不能让大银行合并成越来越大的大型银行，使小银行更难竞争，并将农村、黑人和棕色人种社区抛在后面。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/16/investing/bank-mergers-stocks/index.html\">CNN</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MTB":"美国制商银行","FBC":"弗拉格斯塔万通金控","SBT":"Sterling Bancorp, Inc.","PBCT":"人联金融","WBS":"韦伯斯特金融","PNC":"PNC金融"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/16/investing/bank-mergers-stocks/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101408121","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)Banks have been on a shopping spree for the past year — and that's raising some alarm bells in Washington.\nSenators Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown have been critical of the top banks for their dealmaking, citing concerns that the spate of mergers will hurt average consumers and make it tougher for smaller community banks to remain competitive.\nThere were 52 banks with more than $50 billion in assets at the end of the first quarter of 2021, up from 39 banks at the end of 2017, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence.\nThis year alone, PNC (PNC) bought BBVA USA Bancshares, a deal that allowed PNC to become the fifth-largest bank in the United States by assets. And Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) merged with TCF.\nMeanwhile, several other regional banking deals announced earlier this year are pending approval, including M&T Bank's (MTB) purchase of People's United (PBCT), the acquisition of Flagstar Bancorp (FBC) by New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) and a merger between Webster Financial (WBS) and Sterling Bancorp (SBT).\nCongress is partly responsible for bank merger bonanza\nThe frenetic pace of bank shotgun weddings is largely a result of changes in financial regulations over the past few years.\nIt's no coincidence that there have been a slew of bank mergers since lawmakers ruled in 2018 that banks had to have $250 billion in assets, and not \"just\" $50 billion, in order to be considered systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) that are subject to more regulations.\nOnly a dozen US banks currently are large enough to get a SIFI designation, including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Wells Fargo (WFC), Citigroup (C), Truist (TFC), US Bancorp (USB) and PNC.\nThe SIFI change from $50 billion to $250 billion opened the door for many mid-size banks to scoop up rivals without fear that they would suddenly be required to go through more strict and onerous oversight.\nBanks have took advantage of the change and began pairing up. The reasons for doing so are pretty obvious: Larger institutions can cut costs and improve efficiencies to boost profits.\nThe pandemic jump-started more deals, too. The Federal Reserve's emergency rate cuts have made it more difficult for banks to make money on loans since interest rates are near zero — and likely to stay there for the foreseeable future.\nThat was evident from the latest quarterly results of top banks that were reported this week. Revenue for the second quarter fell at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi and BNY Mellon (BK) when compared with a year ago.\nChanges from DC on the horizon?\nBut it's not clear how much longer the bank M&A wave will last. It is worth noting that the most recent changes to bank laws in Washington were accomplished during the Trump administration and with a Republican-controlled Senate.\nPresident Biden recently signaled with a sweeping executive order that he intends to scrutinize mergers more closely than his predecessor.\nWarren, along with Democratic Congressman Jesus \"Chuy\" Garcia, also introduced a Bank Merger Review Modernization Act bill in December 2019 that could possibly be reintroduced now that the Democrats have a slim majority in the Senate due to a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Harris.\nThe goal of the Warren-Garcia legislation is to \"end rubber stamping of bank merger applications.\"\nThat's likely to get a sympathetic ear from Brown, the Ohio senator who is chair of the Senate's Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.\nBrown grilled Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell Thursday about bank mergers during Powell's appearance before the committee for his semiannual testimony about the economy.\n\"We can't let big banks merge into bigger and bigger megabanks, making it harder for small banks to compete and leaving rural and Black and brown communities behind,\" Brown said in his prepared remarks to Powell.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBT":0.9,"FBC":0.9,"MTB":0.9,"WBS":0.9,"PNC":0.9,"PBCT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":619,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173561865,"gmtCreate":1626670796357,"gmtModify":1633925041905,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173561865","repostId":"1197809141","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197809141","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626666663,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1197809141?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 11:51","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Evergrande Shares, Bonds Slump After Unit’s Bank Deposit Frozen<blockquote>恒大银行存款被冻结后股价、债券暴跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197809141","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- China Evergrande Group’s shares and dollar bonds slumped after a court ordered the fr","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- China Evergrande Group’s shares and dollar bonds slumped after a court ordered the freezing of a bank deposit held by its onshore division, raising concern over the company’s ability to repay debts.</p><p><blockquote>（彭博社）——中国恒大集团的股票和美元债券暴跌，此前法院下令冻结其在岸部门持有的银行存款，引发了人们对该公司偿还债务能力的担忧。</blockquote></p><p> The stock tumbled almost 7% on Monday in Hong Kong trading, while Evergrande’s dollar bond due 2025 fell 2.3 cents on the dollar to 62.7 cents, set for its biggest drop in nearly two weeks, Bloomberg-compiled prices show.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社编制的价格显示，该股周一在香港交易中下跌近7%，而恒大2025年到期的美元债券兑美元汇率下跌2.3美分，至62.7美分，创下近两周来的最大跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> A court in Jiangsu province ordered the freezing of a 132 million yuan ($20 million) bank deposit held by Hengda Real Estate Group and its unit at the request of China Guangfa Bank Co., according to a court ruling released on July 13 that circulated among traders over the weekend. China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., the country’s largest credit risk assessor, previously added Hengda Real Estate to a watch list, partly because of past-due commercial bill payments.</p><p><blockquote>根据7月13日发布的一份法院裁决，应广发银行股份有限公司的要求，江苏省一家法院下令冻结恒大地产集团及其子公司持有的1.32亿元人民币（2000万美元）银行存款。周末在交易员中流传。中国最大的信用风险评估机构中诚信国际资信评估有限公司此前将恒大地产列入观察名单，部分原因是商业票据逾期付款。</blockquote></p><p> The news deepens concern over the financial health of China’s most indebted developer as Beijing cracks down on excess leverage in the property sector. Founder Hui Ka Yan met last month with officials from the country’s top financial regulator, who urged him to solve Evergrande’s cashflow problems as quickly as possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着北京方面打击房地产行业的过度杠杆，这一消息加深了人们对中国负债最重的开发商财务健康状况的担忧。创始人许家印上个月会见了中国最高金融监管机构的官员，后者敦促他尽快解决恒大的现金流问题。</blockquote></p><p> “Evergrande is on the brink of a crisis,” said Shen Chen, a partner at Shanghai Maoliang Investment Management LLP. “The application for asset freezing and the recent overdue commercial bills indicate that Evergrande’s debt and liquidity situation is deteriorating. The company may find it more difficult to raise funding in the future, whether in public bond markets or shadow banking activities such as trust loans.”</p><p><blockquote>“恒大正处于危机的边缘，”上海茂量投资管理有限责任公司合伙人沈晨表示。“资产冻结申请和近期商业票据逾期表明恒大的债务和流动性状况正在恶化。无论是在公开债券市场还是信托贷款等影子银行活动中，公司未来可能会发现融资更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p> Evergrande’s main onshore subsidiary had about $32 billion of commercial bills outstanding as of December, the most of any major Chinese real estate company. Some bills issued by its units were earlier this month trading in the secondary market at implied yields as high as 36%, after a series of missed payments this year.</p><p><blockquote>截至12月，恒大主要在岸子公司的未偿商业票据约为320亿美元，是中国主要房地产公司中最多的。在今年发生一系列拖欠付款后，其子公司发行的一些票据本月早些时候在二级市场交易，隐含收益率高达36%。</blockquote></p><p> Guangfa Bank said “the situation is urgent and its legal interest will be irrevocably damaged if it doesn’t immediately file the asset freeze petition,” according to the ruling.</p><p><blockquote>根据裁决，广发银行表示，“情况紧急，如果不立即提交资产冻结申请，其合法利益将受到不可挽回的损害”。</blockquote></p><p> A representative for Evergrande didn’t immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>恒大的代表周一没有立即回复通过电子邮件发送的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> The latest news also triggered speculation Evergrande may struggle to get approval for a special dividend at a meeting next week. The stock had jumped almost 10% on Friday after Evergrande said it will consider an additional payout to shore up its share price, which has been trading near a four-year low.</p><p><blockquote>最新消息还引发了人们的猜测，恒大可能难以在下周的会议上获得特别股息的批准。在恒大表示将考虑额外派息以支撑股价后，该股周五上涨了近10%，目前该股的交易价格已接近四年低点。</blockquote></p><p> The stock has fallen 33% in the past three months to lead declines on the MSCI China Real Estate Index. The shares last last traded down 4.5%.</p><p><blockquote>该股过去三个月下跌33%，领跌MSCI中国房地产指数。该股最近下跌4.5%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Evergrande Shares, Bonds Slump After Unit’s Bank Deposit Frozen<blockquote>恒大银行存款被冻结后股价、债券暴跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEvergrande Shares, Bonds Slump After Unit’s Bank Deposit Frozen<blockquote>恒大银行存款被冻结后股价、债券暴跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Bloomberg</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 11:51</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- China Evergrande Group’s shares and dollar bonds slumped after a court ordered the freezing of a bank deposit held by its onshore division, raising concern over the company’s ability to repay debts.</p><p><blockquote>（彭博社）——中国恒大集团的股票和美元债券暴跌，此前法院下令冻结其在岸部门持有的银行存款，引发了人们对该公司偿还债务能力的担忧。</blockquote></p><p> The stock tumbled almost 7% on Monday in Hong Kong trading, while Evergrande’s dollar bond due 2025 fell 2.3 cents on the dollar to 62.7 cents, set for its biggest drop in nearly two weeks, Bloomberg-compiled prices show.</p><p><blockquote>彭博社编制的价格显示，该股周一在香港交易中下跌近7%，而恒大2025年到期的美元债券兑美元汇率下跌2.3美分，至62.7美分，创下近两周来的最大跌幅。</blockquote></p><p> A court in Jiangsu province ordered the freezing of a 132 million yuan ($20 million) bank deposit held by Hengda Real Estate Group and its unit at the request of China Guangfa Bank Co., according to a court ruling released on July 13 that circulated among traders over the weekend. China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., the country’s largest credit risk assessor, previously added Hengda Real Estate to a watch list, partly because of past-due commercial bill payments.</p><p><blockquote>根据7月13日发布的一份法院裁决，应广发银行股份有限公司的要求，江苏省一家法院下令冻结恒大地产集团及其子公司持有的1.32亿元人民币（2000万美元）银行存款。周末在交易员中流传。中国最大的信用风险评估机构中诚信国际资信评估有限公司此前将恒大地产列入观察名单，部分原因是商业票据逾期付款。</blockquote></p><p> The news deepens concern over the financial health of China’s most indebted developer as Beijing cracks down on excess leverage in the property sector. Founder Hui Ka Yan met last month with officials from the country’s top financial regulator, who urged him to solve Evergrande’s cashflow problems as quickly as possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着北京方面打击房地产行业的过度杠杆，这一消息加深了人们对中国负债最重的开发商财务健康状况的担忧。创始人许家印上个月会见了中国最高金融监管机构的官员，后者敦促他尽快解决恒大的现金流问题。</blockquote></p><p> “Evergrande is on the brink of a crisis,” said Shen Chen, a partner at Shanghai Maoliang Investment Management LLP. “The application for asset freezing and the recent overdue commercial bills indicate that Evergrande’s debt and liquidity situation is deteriorating. The company may find it more difficult to raise funding in the future, whether in public bond markets or shadow banking activities such as trust loans.”</p><p><blockquote>“恒大正处于危机的边缘，”上海茂量投资管理有限责任公司合伙人沈晨表示。“资产冻结申请和近期商业票据逾期表明恒大的债务和流动性状况正在恶化。无论是在公开债券市场还是信托贷款等影子银行活动中，公司未来可能会发现融资更加困难。”</blockquote></p><p> Evergrande’s main onshore subsidiary had about $32 billion of commercial bills outstanding as of December, the most of any major Chinese real estate company. Some bills issued by its units were earlier this month trading in the secondary market at implied yields as high as 36%, after a series of missed payments this year.</p><p><blockquote>截至12月，恒大主要在岸子公司的未偿商业票据约为320亿美元，是中国主要房地产公司中最多的。在今年发生一系列拖欠付款后，其子公司发行的一些票据本月早些时候在二级市场交易，隐含收益率高达36%。</blockquote></p><p> Guangfa Bank said “the situation is urgent and its legal interest will be irrevocably damaged if it doesn’t immediately file the asset freeze petition,” according to the ruling.</p><p><blockquote>根据裁决，广发银行表示，“情况紧急，如果不立即提交资产冻结申请，其合法利益将受到不可挽回的损害”。</blockquote></p><p> A representative for Evergrande didn’t immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>恒大的代表周一没有立即回复通过电子邮件发送的置评请求。</blockquote></p><p> The latest news also triggered speculation Evergrande may struggle to get approval for a special dividend at a meeting next week. The stock had jumped almost 10% on Friday after Evergrande said it will consider an additional payout to shore up its share price, which has been trading near a four-year low.</p><p><blockquote>最新消息还引发了人们的猜测，恒大可能难以在下周的会议上获得特别股息的批准。在恒大表示将考虑额外派息以支撑股价后，该股周五上涨了近10%，目前该股的交易价格已接近四年低点。</blockquote></p><p> The stock has fallen 33% in the past three months to lead declines on the MSCI China Real Estate Index. The shares last last traded down 4.5%.</p><p><blockquote>该股过去三个月下跌33%，领跌MSCI中国房地产指数。该股最近下跌4.5%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/evergrande-shares-bonds-slump-unit-022737268.html\">Bloomberg</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"03333":"中国恒大"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/evergrande-shares-bonds-slump-unit-022737268.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197809141","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- China Evergrande Group’s shares and dollar bonds slumped after a court ordered the freezing of a bank deposit held by its onshore division, raising concern over the company’s ability to repay debts.\nThe stock tumbled almost 7% on Monday in Hong Kong trading, while Evergrande’s dollar bond due 2025 fell 2.3 cents on the dollar to 62.7 cents, set for its biggest drop in nearly two weeks, Bloomberg-compiled prices show.\nA court in Jiangsu province ordered the freezing of a 132 million yuan ($20 million) bank deposit held by Hengda Real Estate Group and its unit at the request of China Guangfa Bank Co., according to a court ruling released on July 13 that circulated among traders over the weekend. China Chengxin International Credit Rating Co., the country’s largest credit risk assessor, previously added Hengda Real Estate to a watch list, partly because of past-due commercial bill payments.\nThe news deepens concern over the financial health of China’s most indebted developer as Beijing cracks down on excess leverage in the property sector. Founder Hui Ka Yan met last month with officials from the country’s top financial regulator, who urged him to solve Evergrande’s cashflow problems as quickly as possible.\n“Evergrande is on the brink of a crisis,” said Shen Chen, a partner at Shanghai Maoliang Investment Management LLP. “The application for asset freezing and the recent overdue commercial bills indicate that Evergrande’s debt and liquidity situation is deteriorating. The company may find it more difficult to raise funding in the future, whether in public bond markets or shadow banking activities such as trust loans.”\nEvergrande’s main onshore subsidiary had about $32 billion of commercial bills outstanding as of December, the most of any major Chinese real estate company. Some bills issued by its units were earlier this month trading in the secondary market at implied yields as high as 36%, after a series of missed payments this year.\nGuangfa Bank said “the situation is urgent and its legal interest will be irrevocably damaged if it doesn’t immediately file the asset freeze petition,” according to the ruling.\nA representative for Evergrande didn’t immediately respond to an emailed request for comment on Monday.\nThe latest news also triggered speculation Evergrande may struggle to get approval for a special dividend at a meeting next week. The stock had jumped almost 10% on Friday after Evergrande said it will consider an additional payout to shore up its share price, which has been trading near a four-year low.\nThe stock has fallen 33% in the past three months to lead declines on the MSCI China Real Estate Index. The shares last last traded down 4.5%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"03333":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":698,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173561059,"gmtCreate":1626670728171,"gmtModify":1633925042128,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173561059","repostId":"1111084715","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":764,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179728102,"gmtCreate":1626578969606,"gmtModify":1633925718868,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179728102","repostId":"2152368129","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":900,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179721305,"gmtCreate":1626578902007,"gmtModify":1633925720075,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179721305","repostId":"1139907709","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139907709","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626568617,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1139907709?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-18 08:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World<blockquote>华尔街罪与罚：托马斯·F·奎因的疯狂、疯狂、疯狂、疯狂的世界</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139907709","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Q","content":"<p><div> Does crime pay? In August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million. As ...</p><p><blockquote><div>犯罪有报酬吗？1988年8月，法国当局逮捕了一位名叫托马斯·F·奎因的美国侨民，罪名是他策划了一项全球证券计划，诈骗投资者5亿美元。作为...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World<blockquote>华尔街罪与罚：托马斯·F·奎因的疯狂、疯狂、疯狂、疯狂的世界</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World<blockquote>华尔街罪与罚：托马斯·F·奎因的疯狂、疯狂、疯狂、疯狂的世界</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-18 08:36</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Does crime pay? In August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million. As ...</p><p><blockquote><div>犯罪有报酬吗？1988年8月，法国当局逮捕了一位名叫托马斯·F·奎因的美国侨民，罪名是他策划了一项全球证券计划，诈骗投资者5亿美元。作为...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139907709","content_text":"Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million.\nAs an unapologetic financial miscreant with a lifelong penchant for fraud, the French escapade represented something of a career peak for Quinn, whose flair of swindling took on an astonishing level of organizing that left no corner of the world untouched.\nIllusory Assets For Sale:Thomas Francis Quinn was born in Brooklyn in 1932; his father drove a cement truck and his mother was a housewife who made extra money selling clothing and jewelry from the family’s garage.\nQuinn was an altar boy in his childhood and was the first member of his family to pursue higher education, graduating from St. John’s University Law School and passing the bar in 1962.\nQuinn opted to go into business for himself, starting a brokerage firm in New York called Thomas, Williams & Lee.The main focus of this firm became the promotion of Kent Industries,a company that claimed to own Florida property valued at $2 million.\nThere was a slight problem — Kent Industries didn’t own anything in the Sunshine State, and this inconvenient fact helped to introduce Quinn to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).\nLong story short: Quinn received a lifetime banishment from the SEC in 1966 from doing business with brokers and dealers thanks to what the agency defined as his “flagrant fraudulent practices” related to the Kent Industries assets, which the regulator considered to be “almost completely illusory.”\nThe U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was a bit slower in dealing with Quinn, but by 1970 he was sent to jail for six months and was later permanently disbarred from practicing law.\nA Job With The Mob:Prior to losing his law license, Quinn gained a partnership in a New York-based securities law firm that set off several alarms among federal law enforcement agencies. Indeed, an FBI report from 1983 recalled this firm’s chief focus was being responsible for the “funds of hoodlum-controlled companies.”\nQuinn was on both the FBI’s and SEC’s respective radars in the early 1980s for his role with two companies,Sundance Gold Mining and Aquarius Gold Exploration, that claimed to have discovered gold in Suriname. The companies created a flurry of excitement among investors, but an investigation into their operations found a hitherto undeclared connection with the Genovese crime family.\nThe SEC filed a civil complaint against Quinn in 1983, charging him with fraudulently manipulating and promoting the companies’ stocks.\nThree years later, he reached a settlement with the regulator by agreeing to permanently stay away from anything related to securities.\nThe FBI, despite finding Mafia fingerprints in Quinn’s business affairs, declined to press charges against him.\nRealizing that he wore out his welcome in his home country, Quinn and his common-law wife Rochelle Rothfleisch decided to relocate to France and to up his game to an unprecedented operation.\nBoiler Room Follies:The circumstances and details of how Quinn built his swindling masterpiece are a bit fuzzy, but it is believed that the scheme was first hatched in 1984 and was coordinated out of his $6 million villa in the south of France.\nQuinn set up an archipelago of offices in several European countries and in Dubai, Jamaica and the tiny South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, and he gave them phony names that sounded similar to respectable brokerages.\nEach office was staffed with salesmen who were tasked to sell stocks for 20 U.S. corporations to individual investors around the world. The stocks in question were mostly shell companies trading on the over-the-counter exchanges that Quinn picked up for pennies, but they were resold by Quinn’s salesmen at inflated amounts.\nThe investors were culled from mailing lists sold by publishing companies and professional organizations, as well as from respondents to advertisements placed in newsletters focused on the over-the-counter markets.\nQuinn’s henchmen would telephone the investors — nearly all of whom were novices to investing — and do a high-pressure sales spiel that, more often than not, resulted in the separation of the gullible targets from their money.\nQuinn’s team aimed at European, Australian, Middle Eastern and Hong Kong neophyte investors. The only country off-limits from this scheme was the U.S. Quinn was already on the FBI’s radar and the last thing he wanted was to give them cause to pursue him anew.\nA Temporary Setback: In 1988, Quinn’s arrest in France saw him charged with securities fraud, forgery of administrative documents and the possession of two fake Greek passports. His detention and the subsequent arrest of 20 of his salesmen created a fascinating dilemma for banking and law enforcement agencies in multiple countries.\nFor starters, no one could easily figure out where the majority of Quinn’s $500 million in ill-gotten gains wound up. Transfers were traced through banks in Switzerland, Luxembourg and Gibraltar, as well as the beleaguered Bank of Credit and Commerce International in Tampa, Florida, which gained national attention as a favored depository for those involved in drug money laundering. But where the money eventually landed was anyone’s guess, and Quinn’s talent for adopting aliases to cover his business tracks confounded investigators.\nAlso, it was unclear regarding how many people were swindled. A pair of class-action lawsuits brought out a total of 500 people trying to regain their money, but some observers of this case speculated the number could have been higher — some investors might have seen Quinn’s scam as a means of evading local taxes and foreign currency exchanges and would then have to answer to their authorities if this chicanery came to light.\nThe SEC got into the picture because the stocks being sold in the scheme were all U.S. companies. The agency hosted a meeting in Washington D.C. with law enforcement officers and prosecutors from eight European countries and Australia, with the hopes of sorting out the mess. But since no Americans were defrauded in this elaborate charade, Quinn did not face criminal charges in his own country, although the SEC temporarily froze his U.S. assets.\nIn France, Quinn was initially released after agreeing to reimburse his French victims but was arrested again when the Swiss government demanded his extradition.\nHe came to trial in 1991 and was only sentenced to four years in prison, but his sentence was reduced to include time served and he was extradited to Switzerland.\nHis Alpine detention was brief and by the mid-1990s he returned to the U.S. and rented a luxury home in Greenwich, Connecticut, a swanky suburb of New York City.\nAn Eventual Stumble:One of Quinn’s neighbors in Greenwich wasMartin Frankel,a financier with his own addiction to swindling.\nIn 1999, the Wall Street Journal used anonymous “people familiar with the matter” to claim Quinn assisted Frankel in his efforts to raise money for a controlled investment fund designed to buy insurance companies — but this turned out to be an embezzlement scam that resulted in Frankel fleeing the U.S. to Germany on a phony passport.\nFrankel was eventually extradited and spent nearly two decades in prison, but Quinn was never charged for being a partner in Frankel’s shenanigans.\nFor most of the 1990s and the 2000s, Quinn kept a very low public profile, although law enforcement tracked his travels to such far-flung places as the Maldives and the United Arab Emirates.\nIn 2004, he made a rare appearance at the Irish Derby as the co-owner of the winning thoroughbred Grey Swallow. Photographs of Quinn with the winning racehorse marked the only time that he was ever photographed in a public gathering. (Copyright restrictions prevent us from reprinting the photograph here, butthis linkon the RTE website shows Quinn, standing second from right, at the conclusion of the championship race.)\nIn November 2009, Quinn’s luck finally ran out. On a trip back from Ireland to New York’s JFK International Airport, he was arrested for his role within a ring of embezzlers that sought to defraud a pair of British telecommunications companies out of more than $60 million. The scheme had the global hallmarks of Quinn’s earlier criminal triumph, with funds being disbursed to seven countries across four continents.\nQuinn was immediately jailed upon his arrest and was denied bail because it was feared he would attempt to flee the country. He eventually pleaded guilty to a single count of wire fraud and, despite exhortations to avoid prison due to health problems, he was sentenced in March 2013 to 84 months in prison. He was released in May 2016.\nWhat became of Quinn since his release is unknown. No obituary for him has been published, and he would be 89 years old if he is still alive.\nOne information-tracking website listed him residing at a Brooklyn address, but the website also listed an accompanying telephone number that is not in service. Any readers who may have information on Quinn’s whereabouts should contact us and we will offer an update on his story.\nQuinn rarely spoke to anyone about his criminal activities. During an investigative session after his final arrest, he reportedly would only answer questions through a series of eyelid blinks. When a reporter sought to interview him in 1995, he demanded his privacy.\n\"Just forget me,\" Quinn said. \"I've got a lot of trouble and a lot of personal grief. I'm just trying to get on with my life. I'm not in the securities business and never will be again.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":647,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179723008,"gmtCreate":1626578821604,"gmtModify":1633925721158,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179723008","repostId":"1156209584","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":693,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179720660,"gmtCreate":1626578719650,"gmtModify":1633925722503,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179720660","repostId":"1123523681","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":782,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179767253,"gmtCreate":1626578608872,"gmtModify":1633925723439,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583568085402852","authorIdStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179767253","repostId":"1183956332","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":736,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":165648397,"gmtCreate":1624140695919,"gmtModify":1634010436519,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment","listText":"Comment","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":20,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/165648397","repostId":"1113942445","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":469,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165645635,"gmtCreate":1624141213227,"gmtModify":1631884082367,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"If you were living in the New York metropolitan area during the 1970s and 1980s, you probably remember the commercials for the Crazy Eddie electronics retail chain.","listText":"If you were living in the New York metropolitan area during the 1970s and 1980s, you probably remember the commercials for the Crazy Eddie electronics retail chain.","text":"If you were living in the New York metropolitan area during the 1970s and 1980s, you probably remember the commercials for the Crazy Eddie electronics retail chain.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":10,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/165645635","repostId":"1161408410","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153369652,"gmtCreate":1625010470676,"gmtModify":1631889012669,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Altimmune Inc. $(ALT)$ shares dropped in the extended session Tuesday after the biotech said it was discontinuing study of a COVID-19 nasal spray vaccine because it didn't work as well as anticipated.&nbsp;","listText":"Altimmune Inc. $(ALT)$ shares dropped in the extended session Tuesday after the biotech said it was discontinuing study of a COVID-19 nasal spray vaccine because it didn't work as well as anticipated.&nbsp;","text":"Altimmune Inc. $(ALT)$ shares dropped in the extended session Tuesday after the biotech said it was discontinuing study of a COVID-19 nasal spray vaccine because it didn't work as well as anticipated.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153369652","repostId":"2147603368","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1787,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185623725,"gmtCreate":1623646945667,"gmtModify":1634030669300,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment","listText":"Comment","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":8,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185623725","repostId":"1105297799","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":591,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":115383727,"gmtCreate":1622951629269,"gmtModify":1634096649970,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment","listText":"Comment","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":7,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/115383727","repostId":"2140540596","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":157716607,"gmtCreate":1625615359809,"gmtModify":1633939139275,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The Department of Defense said it’s calling off the $10 billion cloud contract that was the subject of a legal battle involving Amazon and Microsoft.","listText":"The Department of Defense said it’s calling off the $10 billion cloud contract that was the subject of a legal battle involving Amazon and Microsoft.","text":"The Department of Defense said it’s calling off the $10 billion cloud contract that was the subject of a legal battle involving Amazon and Microsoft.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/157716607","repostId":"1157091501","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":720,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152534200,"gmtCreate":1625309521300,"gmtModify":1633941558345,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.","listText":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.","text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152534200","repostId":"1136694264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136694264","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1625293431,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1136694264?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-03 14:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并不气馁，多次抨击评级</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136694264","media":"Benzinga","summary":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment Holdin","content":"<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Research宣布在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg表示，由于该股6月份横盘整理，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的人气看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构不断抛售AMC看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员购买了价值超过259万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到12月17日不等，一些交易员选择了高达145美元的执行价。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC的股价看跌突破了周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形，但守住了47.91美元的支撑位并从中反弹。多头希望看到继续逢低买入，并希望AMC通过打印锤子烛台并收于21日指数移动平均线上方来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么它很重要：</b>当出现扫单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将大幅波动。清扫者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，清扫多个交易所的订单簿以立即执行订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这些类型的看涨期权期权订单通常由机构发出，散户投资者会发现观察清道夫很有用，因为这表明“聪明的资金”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC期权交易：</b>以下是由Benzinga Pro提供的值得注意的选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午9点42分，一名交易员在265份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为59美元，将于7月9日到期。该交易代表了52,205美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了1.97美元。</li><li>上午9点51分，一名交易员在247份执行价为65美元、将于8月20日到期的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.95美元。</li><li>上午9点52分，一名交易员在248份执行价为120美元、将于12月17日到期的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了260,400美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了10.50美元。</li><li>上午9点53分，一名交易员在356份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了311,500美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.75美元。</li><li>上午9点53分，一名交易员在310份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.60美元。</li><li>上午9点56分，一名交易员在310份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.60美元。</li><li>上午9点57分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的300份执行价为28美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了23.40美元。</li><li>上午9点58分，一名交易员在289份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为120美元，将于12月17日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了10.50美元。</li><li>上午9点58分，一名交易员在7月16日到期的580份执行价为55美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了278,400美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了4.80美元。</li><li>上午10点07分，一名交易员在7月16日到期的258份执行价为80美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表39,216美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付1.52美元。</li><li>上午10点24分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的执行价为50美元的352份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了54,560美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了1.55美元。</li><li>上午10点26分，一名交易员在7月23日到期的234份执行价为145美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表39,216美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付1.31美元。</li><li>上午10点31分，一名交易员在224份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价为145美元，将于9月17日到期。该交易代表了105,280美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了4.70美元。</li><li>上午10点38分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的500份执行价为47美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了146,000美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了2.92美元。</li><li>中午12点02分，一名交易员在7月9日到期的500份执行价为45美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了305,000美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了6.10美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌5.3%，至51.33美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并不气馁，多次抨击评级</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls<blockquote>AMC期权交易员并不气馁，多次抨击评级</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-03 14:23</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p><p><blockquote>周五上午，Iceberg Research宣布在<b>AMC院线控股</b>AMC 4.08%。Iceberg表示，由于该股6月份横盘整理，期权交易员已经亏损，而且该股周围的人气看起来不稳定。</blockquote></p><p> The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p><p><blockquote>这一消息并没有阻止机构不断抛售AMC看涨期权合约，周五期权交易员购买了价值超过259万美元的合约。这些合约的到期日从今天到12月17日不等，一些交易员选择了高达145美元的执行价。</blockquote></p><p> AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p><p><blockquote>AMC的股价看跌突破了周五横盘交易形成的对称三角形，但守住了47.91美元的支撑位并从中反弹。多头希望看到继续逢低买入，并希望AMC通过打印锤子烛台并收于21日指数移动平均线上方来结束这一天。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p><p><blockquote><b>为什么它很重要：</b>当出现扫单时，表明交易者希望快速建仓，并预计股价即将大幅波动。清扫者为看涨期权或看跌期权支付市场价格，而不是出价，清扫多个交易所的订单簿以立即执行订单。</blockquote></p><p> These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p><p><blockquote>这些类型的看涨期权期权订单通常由机构发出，散户投资者会发现观察清道夫很有用，因为这表明“聪明的资金”已经建仓。</blockquote></p><p> <b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p><p><blockquote><b>AMC期权交易：</b>以下是由Benzinga Pro提供的值得注意的选项警报：</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul>  <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>  <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li> </ul> <b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>周五上午9点42分，一名交易员在265份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为59美元，将于7月9日到期。该交易代表了52,205美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了1.97美元。</li><li>上午9点51分，一名交易员在247份执行价为65美元、将于8月20日到期的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.95美元。</li><li>上午9点52分，一名交易员在248份执行价为120美元、将于12月17日到期的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了260,400美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了10.50美元。</li><li>上午9点53分，一名交易员在356份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了311,500美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.75美元。</li><li>上午9点53分，一名交易员在310份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.60美元。</li><li>上午9点56分，一名交易员在310份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为65美元，将于8月20日到期。该交易代表了266,600美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了8.60美元。</li><li>上午9点57分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的300份执行价为28美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了221,065美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了23.40美元。</li><li>上午9点58分，一名交易员在289份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价格为120美元，将于12月17日到期。该交易代表了303,450美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了10.50美元。</li><li>上午9点58分，一名交易员在7月16日到期的580份执行价为55美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了278,400美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了4.80美元。</li><li>上午10点07分，一名交易员在7月16日到期的258份执行价为80美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表39,216美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付1.52美元。</li><li>上午10点24分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的执行价为50美元的352份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了54,560美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了1.55美元。</li><li>上午10点26分，一名交易员在7月23日到期的234份执行价为145美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表39,216美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付1.31美元。</li><li>上午10点31分，一名交易员在224份AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓，执行价为145美元，将于9月17日到期。该交易代表了105,280美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了4.70美元。</li><li>上午10点38分，一名交易员在7月2日到期的500份执行价为47美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了146,000美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了2.92美元。</li><li>中午12点02分，一名交易员在7月9日到期的500份执行价为45美元的AMC院线期权的买入价附近执行了看涨期权清仓。该交易代表了305,000美元的看涨押注，交易者为每份期权合约支付了6.10美元。</li></ul><b>AMC价格走势：</b>截至发稿时，AMC院线股价下跌5.3%，至51.33美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136694264","content_text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.\nThe news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.\nAMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.\nWhy It’s Important:When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.\nThese types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.\nThe AMC Option Trades:Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:\n\nAt 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.\nAt 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.\nAt 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.\nAt 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.\nAt 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.\nAt 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.\nAt 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.\nAt 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.\nAt 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.\n\nAMC Price Action:Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1184,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184276212,"gmtCreate":1623717388636,"gmtModify":1634029713805,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment&nbsp;","listText":"Comment&nbsp;","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184276212","repostId":"2143351287","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":565,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188513995,"gmtCreate":1623454497617,"gmtModify":1634033078625,"author":{"id":"3583568085402852","authorId":"3583568085402852","name":"IsaacYap90","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40f66d0266826bb209ee22688d7bbde5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583568085402852","idStr":"3583568085402852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment","listText":"Comment","text":"Comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/188513995","repostId":"2142744202","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}