Keesl2216的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Keesl2216

Keesl2216

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

419关注

21粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-12-30

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-29

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-24

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-23

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-21

Up

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-12

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-04

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-03

Down

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-01

Why price still drop?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-01

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-27

Shag

These 3 Stocks Punished the Dow Friday<blockquote>这三只股票周五惩罚了道琼斯指数</blockquote>

2021-11-26

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-25

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-23

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-22

Ok

Can Amazon Stock Hit $4,000 Before Year-End 2021?<blockquote>亚马逊股价能在 2021 年底前达到 4,000 美元吗？</blockquote>

2021-11-21

Moon

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-18

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-17

Ok

Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est<blockquote>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</blockquote>

2021-11-17

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-17

Ok

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3583308786901817","uuid":"3583308786901817","gmtCreate":1620216029830,"gmtModify":1622304077493,"name":"Keesl2216","pinyin":"keesl2216","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":21,"headSize":419,"tweetSize":118,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.33%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"93.66%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":692075788,"gmtCreate":1640819172634,"gmtModify":1640819172900,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692075788","repostId":"2195466435","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3611,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":696582999,"gmtCreate":1640735742713,"gmtModify":1640735742989,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/696582999","repostId":"1186633322","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3502,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":698398044,"gmtCreate":1640301400043,"gmtModify":1640301400951,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/698398044","repostId":"2193078140","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691277116,"gmtCreate":1640216975573,"gmtModify":1640216975789,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691277116","repostId":"2193113147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":693228292,"gmtCreate":1640042994208,"gmtModify":1640043217263,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Up","listText":"Up","text":"Up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693228292","repostId":"2193136468","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3318,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":605726257,"gmtCreate":1639268684894,"gmtModify":1639268686361,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/605726257","repostId":"2190675480","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3414,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":601771444,"gmtCreate":1638576967912,"gmtModify":1638576968062,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601771444","repostId":"1177965649","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3961,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":601331230,"gmtCreate":1638490222998,"gmtModify":1638490326833,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Down","listText":"Down","text":"Down","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/601331230","repostId":"2188951783","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":603959849,"gmtCreate":1638356216382,"gmtModify":1638356216751,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Why price still drop?","listText":"Why price still drop?","text":"Why price still drop?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/603959849","repostId":"1189400421","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4767,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":609485893,"gmtCreate":1638317899130,"gmtModify":1638317899270,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/609485893","repostId":"2188534688","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":877484211,"gmtCreate":1637973106500,"gmtModify":1637973106687,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Shag","listText":"Shag","text":"Shag","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877484211","repostId":"1128119268","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128119268","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637972590,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1128119268?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-27 08:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These 3 Stocks Punished the Dow Friday<blockquote>这三只股票周五惩罚了道琼斯指数</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128119268","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The stock market was definitely not in a holiday mood on the day after Thanksgiving, as news of the ","content":"<p>The stock market was definitely not in a holiday mood on the day after Thanksgiving, as news of the new Omicron variant of COVID-19 led to widespread concerns about a possible return to lockdown conditions. By the end of the day, the&nbsp;<b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b>(DJINDICES:^DJI),<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC), and&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)were all down between 2% and 3%.</p><p><blockquote>感恩节后的第二天，股市绝对没有节日气氛，因为新冠肺炎新奥密克戎变种的消息引发了人们对可能恢复封锁条件的广泛担忧。到一天结束时，<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>(djinindeces:^DJI)，<b>标普500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)，以及<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>（纳斯达克指数：^IXIC）均下跌 2% 至 3%。</blockquote></p><p> Today's news hurt stocks in many different sectors of the market, with a wide variety of factors playing into losses. Because of theDow's price-weighted nature, a few stocks had a disproportionate influence on the average's moves. Below, we'll look at how&nbsp;<b>American Express</b>(NYSE:AXP),<b>Boeing</b>(NYSE:BA), and&nbsp;<b>Goldman Sachs</b>(NYSE:GS)combined to lop about 250 points off the Dow by themselves.</p><p><blockquote>今天的消息损害了市场许多不同板块的股票，各种因素都导致了损失。由于道琼斯指数的价格加权性质，少数股票对平均线的走势产生了不成比例的影响。下面，我们将看看如何<b>美国运通</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：AXP），<b>波音</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BA），以及<b>高盛</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：GS）合计下跌道琼斯指数约 250 点。</blockquote></p><p> A double hit for American Express</p><p><blockquote>美国运通的双重打击</blockquote></p><p> American Express was the worst performer in the Dow, falling almost 9%. The financial company saw its stock fall for two different reasons related to the news about the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国运通是道琼斯指数中表现最差的股票，下跌近 9%。这家金融公司的股价因与大流行新闻相关的两个不同原因而下跌。</blockquote></p><p> First and foremost, American Express has historically relied on global travel to drive a substantial part of its business. Its traveler's checks are known around the world as a means of doing business, and its charge cards have prestige in key market destinations. The prospects for further restrictions on travel, therefore, would have a detrimental impact on its business.</p><p><blockquote>首先，美国运通历来依赖全球旅行来推动其大部分业务。其旅行支票作为一种做生意的手段而闻名于世，其签帐卡在主要市场目的地享有盛誉。因此，进一步限制旅行的前景将对其业务产生不利影响。</blockquote></p><p> Moreover, as a financial institution,American Express benefits from a steeper yield curve. The recent trend in that direction met an abrupt reversal on Friday, as bond yields plunged on prospects for a possible economic slowdown. Investors anticipate that the company could have problems meeting its own expectations if the pandemic worsens, and that's why the stock cost the Dow about 100 points on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>此外，作为一家金融机构，美国运通受益于更陡峭的收益率曲线。由于经济可能放缓的前景导致债券收益率暴跌，这一方向的近期趋势在周五突然逆转。投资者预计，如果疫情恶化，该公司可能很难达到自己的预期，这就是该股周五导致道琼斯指数下跌约 100 点的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Flying lower</p><p><blockquote>飞得更低</blockquote></p><p> Another company that one would've expected to fare poorly given the news was&nbsp;<b>Boeing</b>(NYSE:BA). The aerospace company fell more than 5%, and its higher-priced shares gave it a big impact on the Dow.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这一消息，另一家人们预计会表现不佳的公司是<b>波音</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BA）。这家航空航天公司下跌超过 5%，其股价上涨对道琼斯指数造成了重大影响。</blockquote></p><p> You won't find&nbsp;airline stocks&nbsp;in the Dow Industrials, but they took even larger hits as a result of the COVID news. Already, the U.S. and other nations have put travel restrictions on South Africa and neighboring countries to try to stem the spread of the Omicron variant. That bodes poorly for airlines serving those markets, and it indirectly affects Boeing by raising the possibility that airlines will have to cancel or postpone orders if they come under additional economic pressure.</p><p><blockquote>你不会在道琼斯工业指数中找到航空股，但由于新冠疫情的消息，它们遭受了更大的打击。美国和其他国家已经对南非和邻国实施了旅行限制，以试图阻止奥密克戎变种的传播。这对服务于这些市场的航空公司来说是个坏兆头，并且间接影响了波音公司，因为它增加了航空公司在面临额外经济压力时不得不取消或推迟订单的可能性。</blockquote></p><p> Boeing has suffered substantial losses, but investors were starting to hope that it would turn profitable again in 2022. The latest news threatens that assessment, and investors don't like the prospects for more red ink from the aircraft manufacturer.</p><p><blockquote>波音公司遭受了巨大损失，但投资者开始希望它能在 2022 年再次盈利。最新消息威胁到这一评估，投资者不喜欢这家飞机制造商获得更多红墨水的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Banking on rate rises</p><p><blockquote>加息银行业务</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs was down 2.5% on Friday. Its nearly $10 decline cost the Dow roughly 70 points on the day.</p><p><blockquote>高盛周五下跌 2.5%。其近 10 美元的下跌导致道琼斯指数当天下跌约 70 点。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman faced some of the same challenges that American Express does. Increasingly,Goldman has tried to boost its retail banking presence&nbsp;through its Marcus unit, and that has exposed the Wall Street financial giant to greater interest rate sensitivity. The flattening yield curve Friday didn't do any favors to the company's consumer banking segment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛面临着与美国运通相同的一些挑战。高盛越来越多地试图通过其马库斯部门来增强其零售银行业务，这使得这家华尔街金融巨头面临更大的利率敏感性。周五收益率曲线趋平并没有给该公司的消费者银行业务带来任何好处。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street has also benefited from huge levels of investment banking activity, where Goldman excels. If a market pullback leads to reduced activity for initial public offerings, acquisitions, and other corporate events, then it could hurt that part of Goldman's business as well.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街也受益于高盛擅长的大规模投资银行活动。如果市场回调导致首次公开募股、收购和其他企业活动减少，那么这也可能损害高盛的这部分业务。</blockquote></p><p> Don't panic</p><p><blockquote>不要惊慌</blockquote></p><p> A 900-point plunge for the Dow makes for a scary headline, but it's just part of the natural volatility of the stock market. Don't lose perspective, and if you stick with your long-term investment strategy, things will likely go better for you than if you panic.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数暴跌 900 点成为一个可怕的头条新闻，但这只是股市自然波动的一部分。不要失去观点，如果你坚持你的长期投资策略，事情可能会比你恐慌更好。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 3 Stocks Punished the Dow Friday<blockquote>这三只股票周五惩罚了道琼斯指数</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 3 Stocks Punished the Dow Friday<blockquote>这三只股票周五惩罚了道琼斯指数</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-27 08:23</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The stock market was definitely not in a holiday mood on the day after Thanksgiving, as news of the new Omicron variant of COVID-19 led to widespread concerns about a possible return to lockdown conditions. By the end of the day, the&nbsp;<b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b>(DJINDICES:^DJI),<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC), and&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)were all down between 2% and 3%.</p><p><blockquote>感恩节后的第二天，股市绝对没有节日气氛，因为新冠肺炎新奥密克戎变种的消息引发了人们对可能恢复封锁条件的广泛担忧。到一天结束时，<b>道琼斯工业指数</b>(djinindeces:^DJI)，<b>标普500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)，以及<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>（纳斯达克指数：^IXIC）均下跌 2% 至 3%。</blockquote></p><p> Today's news hurt stocks in many different sectors of the market, with a wide variety of factors playing into losses. Because of theDow's price-weighted nature, a few stocks had a disproportionate influence on the average's moves. Below, we'll look at how&nbsp;<b>American Express</b>(NYSE:AXP),<b>Boeing</b>(NYSE:BA), and&nbsp;<b>Goldman Sachs</b>(NYSE:GS)combined to lop about 250 points off the Dow by themselves.</p><p><blockquote>今天的消息损害了市场许多不同板块的股票，各种因素都导致了损失。由于道琼斯指数的价格加权性质，少数股票对平均线的走势产生了不成比例的影响。下面，我们将看看如何<b>美国运通</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：AXP），<b>波音</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BA），以及<b>高盛</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：GS）合计下跌道琼斯指数约 250 点。</blockquote></p><p> A double hit for American Express</p><p><blockquote>美国运通的双重打击</blockquote></p><p> American Express was the worst performer in the Dow, falling almost 9%. The financial company saw its stock fall for two different reasons related to the news about the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>美国运通是道琼斯指数中表现最差的股票，下跌近 9%。这家金融公司的股价因与大流行新闻相关的两个不同原因而下跌。</blockquote></p><p> First and foremost, American Express has historically relied on global travel to drive a substantial part of its business. Its traveler's checks are known around the world as a means of doing business, and its charge cards have prestige in key market destinations. The prospects for further restrictions on travel, therefore, would have a detrimental impact on its business.</p><p><blockquote>首先，美国运通历来依赖全球旅行来推动其大部分业务。其旅行支票作为一种做生意的手段而闻名于世，其签帐卡在主要市场目的地享有盛誉。因此，进一步限制旅行的前景将对其业务产生不利影响。</blockquote></p><p> Moreover, as a financial institution,American Express benefits from a steeper yield curve. The recent trend in that direction met an abrupt reversal on Friday, as bond yields plunged on prospects for a possible economic slowdown. Investors anticipate that the company could have problems meeting its own expectations if the pandemic worsens, and that's why the stock cost the Dow about 100 points on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>此外，作为一家金融机构，美国运通受益于更陡峭的收益率曲线。由于经济可能放缓的前景导致债券收益率暴跌，这一方向的近期趋势在周五突然逆转。投资者预计，如果疫情恶化，该公司可能很难达到自己的预期，这就是该股周五导致道琼斯指数下跌约 100 点的原因。</blockquote></p><p> Flying lower</p><p><blockquote>飞得更低</blockquote></p><p> Another company that one would've expected to fare poorly given the news was&nbsp;<b>Boeing</b>(NYSE:BA). The aerospace company fell more than 5%, and its higher-priced shares gave it a big impact on the Dow.</p><p><blockquote>鉴于这一消息，另一家人们预计会表现不佳的公司是<b>波音</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：BA）。这家航空航天公司下跌超过 5%，其股价上涨对道琼斯指数造成了重大影响。</blockquote></p><p> You won't find&nbsp;airline stocks&nbsp;in the Dow Industrials, but they took even larger hits as a result of the COVID news. Already, the U.S. and other nations have put travel restrictions on South Africa and neighboring countries to try to stem the spread of the Omicron variant. That bodes poorly for airlines serving those markets, and it indirectly affects Boeing by raising the possibility that airlines will have to cancel or postpone orders if they come under additional economic pressure.</p><p><blockquote>你不会在道琼斯工业指数中找到航空股，但由于新冠疫情的消息，它们遭受了更大的打击。美国和其他国家已经对南非和邻国实施了旅行限制，以试图阻止奥密克戎变种的传播。这对服务于这些市场的航空公司来说是个坏兆头，并且间接影响了波音公司，因为它增加了航空公司在面临额外经济压力时不得不取消或推迟订单的可能性。</blockquote></p><p> Boeing has suffered substantial losses, but investors were starting to hope that it would turn profitable again in 2022. The latest news threatens that assessment, and investors don't like the prospects for more red ink from the aircraft manufacturer.</p><p><blockquote>波音公司遭受了巨大损失，但投资者开始希望它能在 2022 年再次盈利。最新消息威胁到这一评估，投资者不喜欢这家飞机制造商获得更多红墨水的前景。</blockquote></p><p> Banking on rate rises</p><p><blockquote>加息银行业务</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs was down 2.5% on Friday. Its nearly $10 decline cost the Dow roughly 70 points on the day.</p><p><blockquote>高盛周五下跌 2.5%。其近 10 美元的下跌导致道琼斯指数当天下跌约 70 点。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman faced some of the same challenges that American Express does. Increasingly,Goldman has tried to boost its retail banking presence&nbsp;through its Marcus unit, and that has exposed the Wall Street financial giant to greater interest rate sensitivity. The flattening yield curve Friday didn't do any favors to the company's consumer banking segment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛面临着与美国运通相同的一些挑战。高盛越来越多地试图通过其马库斯部门来增强其零售银行业务，这使得这家华尔街金融巨头面临更大的利率敏感性。周五收益率曲线趋平并没有给该公司的消费者银行业务带来任何好处。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street has also benefited from huge levels of investment banking activity, where Goldman excels. If a market pullback leads to reduced activity for initial public offerings, acquisitions, and other corporate events, then it could hurt that part of Goldman's business as well.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街也受益于高盛擅长的大规模投资银行活动。如果市场回调导致首次公开募股、收购和其他企业活动减少，那么这也可能损害高盛的这部分业务。</blockquote></p><p> Don't panic</p><p><blockquote>不要惊慌</blockquote></p><p> A 900-point plunge for the Dow makes for a scary headline, but it's just part of the natural volatility of the stock market. Don't lose perspective, and if you stick with your long-term investment strategy, things will likely go better for you than if you panic.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯指数暴跌 900 点成为一个可怕的头条新闻，但这只是股市自然波动的一部分。不要失去观点，如果你坚持你的长期投资策略，事情可能会比你恐慌更好。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/26/these-3-stocks-punished-the-dow-friday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BA":"波音","GS":"高盛","AXP":"美国运通"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/11/26/these-3-stocks-punished-the-dow-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128119268","content_text":"The stock market was definitely not in a holiday mood on the day after Thanksgiving, as news of the new Omicron variant of COVID-19 led to widespread concerns about a possible return to lockdown conditions. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average(DJINDICES:^DJI),S&P 500(SNPINDEX:^GSPC), and Nasdaq Composite(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)were all down between 2% and 3%.\nToday's news hurt stocks in many different sectors of the market, with a wide variety of factors playing into losses. Because of theDow's price-weighted nature, a few stocks had a disproportionate influence on the average's moves. Below, we'll look at how American Express(NYSE:AXP),Boeing(NYSE:BA), and Goldman Sachs(NYSE:GS)combined to lop about 250 points off the Dow by themselves.\nA double hit for American Express\nAmerican Express was the worst performer in the Dow, falling almost 9%. The financial company saw its stock fall for two different reasons related to the news about the pandemic.\nFirst and foremost, American Express has historically relied on global travel to drive a substantial part of its business. Its traveler's checks are known around the world as a means of doing business, and its charge cards have prestige in key market destinations. The prospects for further restrictions on travel, therefore, would have a detrimental impact on its business.\nMoreover, as a financial institution,American Express benefits from a steeper yield curve. The recent trend in that direction met an abrupt reversal on Friday, as bond yields plunged on prospects for a possible economic slowdown. Investors anticipate that the company could have problems meeting its own expectations if the pandemic worsens, and that's why the stock cost the Dow about 100 points on Friday.\nFlying lower\nAnother company that one would've expected to fare poorly given the news was Boeing(NYSE:BA). The aerospace company fell more than 5%, and its higher-priced shares gave it a big impact on the Dow.\nYou won't find airline stocks in the Dow Industrials, but they took even larger hits as a result of the COVID news. Already, the U.S. and other nations have put travel restrictions on South Africa and neighboring countries to try to stem the spread of the Omicron variant. That bodes poorly for airlines serving those markets, and it indirectly affects Boeing by raising the possibility that airlines will have to cancel or postpone orders if they come under additional economic pressure.\nBoeing has suffered substantial losses, but investors were starting to hope that it would turn profitable again in 2022. The latest news threatens that assessment, and investors don't like the prospects for more red ink from the aircraft manufacturer.\nBanking on rate rises\nGoldman Sachs was down 2.5% on Friday. Its nearly $10 decline cost the Dow roughly 70 points on the day.\nGoldman faced some of the same challenges that American Express does. Increasingly,Goldman has tried to boost its retail banking presence through its Marcus unit, and that has exposed the Wall Street financial giant to greater interest rate sensitivity. The flattening yield curve Friday didn't do any favors to the company's consumer banking segment.\nWall Street has also benefited from huge levels of investment banking activity, where Goldman excels. If a market pullback leads to reduced activity for initial public offerings, acquisitions, and other corporate events, then it could hurt that part of Goldman's business as well.\nDon't panic\nA 900-point plunge for the Dow makes for a scary headline, but it's just part of the natural volatility of the stock market. Don't lose perspective, and if you stick with your long-term investment strategy, things will likely go better for you than if you panic.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BA":0.9,"GS":0.9,"AXP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1009,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":877109834,"gmtCreate":1637893696419,"gmtModify":1637893696536,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/877109834","repostId":"2186839666","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1383,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":874505509,"gmtCreate":1637798703403,"gmtModify":1637798703581,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/874505509","repostId":"2186365808","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1143,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":875181707,"gmtCreate":1637624899026,"gmtModify":1637624899133,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875181707","repostId":"2185306806","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872265538,"gmtCreate":1637539756235,"gmtModify":1637539756377,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872265538","repostId":"1152232143","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152232143","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1637538393,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1152232143?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-22 07:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Amazon Stock Hit $4,000 Before Year-End 2021?<blockquote>亚马逊股价能在 2021 年底前达到 4,000 美元吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152232143","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Amazon stock is finally looking like it's breaking out. Can it hit $4,000 by year-end?\nAmazon shares","content":"<p>Amazon stock is finally looking like it's breaking out. Can it hit $4,000 by year-end?</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股票终于看起来要爆发了。年底能达到4000美元吗？</blockquote></p><p> Amazon&nbsp;shares have been charging higher lately, up 4.3% last week.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价最近一直在走高，上周上涨了 4.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Many investors have been waiting months — no, quarters — for Amazon to breakout.</p><p><blockquote>许多投资者已经等待了几个月——不，是几个季度——等待亚马逊的突破。</blockquote></p><p> It didn’t matter that it had strong earnings, good news and a surging Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500.</p><p><blockquote>它拥有强劲的盈利、好消息以及飙升的纳斯达克和标普500，这并不重要。</blockquote></p><p> Ironically, its last two quarterly reports weren't that great and the last one was a rare&nbsp;top- and bottom-line miss.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，它的最后两份季度报告并没有那么好，最后一份报告是一个罕见的营收和利润失误。</blockquote></p><p> However, shares bottomed in the&nbsp;first post-earnings session&nbsp;and Amazon stock hasn’t looked back.</p><p><blockquote>然而，亚马逊股价在财报发布后的第一个交易日触底，亚马逊股价也没有回头。</blockquote></p><p> Despite the massive IPO&nbsp;from Rivian&nbsp;on Nov. 10, Amazon really struggled with a breakout over the $3,550 level.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 11 月 10 日Rivian进行了大规模 IPO，但亚马逊确实难以突破 3,550 美元的水平。</blockquote></p><p> That's as it has a stake in Rivian, by the way.</p><p><blockquote>顺便说一句，那是因为它在Rivian有股份。</blockquote></p><p> Up over 6.5% so far this week though and bulls are looking for a potential year-end rally in Amazon.</p><p><blockquote>不过，本周迄今已上涨超过 6.5%，多头正在寻找亚马逊年底可能出现的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier this week, analysts at Goldman Sachs named Amazon&nbsp;their top internet stock for 2022.</p><p><blockquote>本周早些时候，高盛分析师将亚马逊评为 2022 年最佳互联网股票。</blockquote></p><p> Nearing new all-time high territory now, let’s look at the charts.</p><p><blockquote>现在接近历史新高，让我们来看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Amazon Stock</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易亚马逊股票</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55bdcb9f23bb51b493a1ab3a9376f0a9\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Amazon stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>亚马逊股票日线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Earlier this morning I looked at Apple, arguing that this stock and Amazon are both likely to be&nbsp;buy-the-dip candidates going forward.</p><p><blockquote>今天早上早些时候，我看了苹果，认为这只股票和亚马逊都可能成为未来逢低买入的候选者。</blockquote></p><p> It helps that Wedbush analysts laid down a pretty&nbsp;bullish outlook on the Nasdaq&nbsp;(even though they favored Apple as their top FAANG holding).</p><p><blockquote>韦德布什分析师对纳斯达克做出了相当乐观的前景，这很有帮助（尽管他们更看好苹果作为他们最大的FAANG持股）。</blockquote></p><p> Above is a daily chart, highlighting how many times Amazon flirted with a breakout over the $3,550 area.</p><p><blockquote>上面是一张日线图，突出显示了亚马逊有多少次试图突破 3,550 美元区域。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier in the week I tweeted that one day investors would look up and the “train will have left the station.” Is that happening now?</p><p><blockquote>本周早些时候，我在推特上说，总有一天投资者会抬起头来，“火车会离开车站”。现在发生了吗？</blockquote></p><p> Bulls hope so, as they fix their attention on the $3,773 high from July. Not only is that the third-quarter high, but it’s also the all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>多头希望如此，因为他们将注意力集中在 7 月份以来的高点 3,773 美元上。这不仅是第三季度的最高值，也是历史最高值。</blockquote></p><p> A breakout over this level could open the door to the 161.8% extension near $3,975, followed by a possible push over $4,000.</p><p><blockquote>突破这一水平可能会为 3,975 美元附近的 161.8% 扩张打开大门，随后可能突破 4,000 美元。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff98ccb4ff4468d09e6945c88212c4cc\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Weekly chart of Amazon stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>亚马逊股票周线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Above $4,000 could put an additional push to the $4,125 to $4,150 area in play if we measure an extension from the more recent third-quarter range. That’s shown on the weekly chart above.</p><p><blockquote>如果我们衡量较最近的第三季度区间有所扩大，4,000 美元以上可能会进一步推动 4,125 美元至 4,150 美元的区域。如上图所示。</blockquote></p><p> There is a risk here, too.</p><p><blockquote>这里也有风险。</blockquote></p><p> While Amazon stock looks pretty good right now — especially heading into Black Friday and Cyber Monday — there is a risk that we get some type of reversal or failure near the current $3,775 highs.</p><p><blockquote>虽然亚马逊股票目前看起来相当不错——尤其是在黑色星期五和网络星期一到来之际——但我们有可能在当前 3,775 美元的高点附近出现某种类型的逆转或失败。</blockquote></p><p> After all, the stock looked pretty good in July too, before it ultimately rolled back over. Stay on guard for that type of rug pull, which could put the $3,550 to $3,600 area back in play.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，在最终回落之前，该股在 7 月份看起来也相当不错。对这种类型的地毯拉动保持警惕，这可能会使 3,550 美元至 3,600 美元的区域重新发挥作用。</blockquote></p><p> However, the weekly chart emphasizes how patience has been rewarded in this stock. Shares tend to go on long consolidation phases before eventually roaring higher.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周线图强调了耐心是如何在这只股票中得到回报的。股价往往会经历漫长的盘整阶段，然后最终飙升。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Amazon Stock Hit $4,000 Before Year-End 2021?<blockquote>亚马逊股价能在 2021 年底前达到 4,000 美元吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Amazon Stock Hit $4,000 Before Year-End 2021?<blockquote>亚马逊股价能在 2021 年底前达到 4,000 美元吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-11-22 07:46</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amazon stock is finally looking like it's breaking out. Can it hit $4,000 by year-end?</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股票终于看起来要爆发了。年底能达到4000美元吗？</blockquote></p><p> Amazon&nbsp;shares have been charging higher lately, up 4.3% last week.</p><p><blockquote>亚马逊股价最近一直在走高，上周上涨了 4.3%。</blockquote></p><p> Many investors have been waiting months — no, quarters — for Amazon to breakout.</p><p><blockquote>许多投资者已经等待了几个月——不，是几个季度——等待亚马逊的突破。</blockquote></p><p> It didn’t matter that it had strong earnings, good news and a surging Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500.</p><p><blockquote>它拥有强劲的盈利、好消息以及飙升的纳斯达克和标普500，这并不重要。</blockquote></p><p> Ironically, its last two quarterly reports weren't that great and the last one was a rare&nbsp;top- and bottom-line miss.</p><p><blockquote>具有讽刺意味的是，它的最后两份季度报告并没有那么好，最后一份报告是一个罕见的营收和利润失误。</blockquote></p><p> However, shares bottomed in the&nbsp;first post-earnings session&nbsp;and Amazon stock hasn’t looked back.</p><p><blockquote>然而，亚马逊股价在财报发布后的第一个交易日触底，亚马逊股价也没有回头。</blockquote></p><p> Despite the massive IPO&nbsp;from Rivian&nbsp;on Nov. 10, Amazon really struggled with a breakout over the $3,550 level.</p><p><blockquote>尽管 11 月 10 日Rivian进行了大规模 IPO，但亚马逊确实难以突破 3,550 美元的水平。</blockquote></p><p> That's as it has a stake in Rivian, by the way.</p><p><blockquote>顺便说一句，那是因为它在Rivian有股份。</blockquote></p><p> Up over 6.5% so far this week though and bulls are looking for a potential year-end rally in Amazon.</p><p><blockquote>不过，本周迄今已上涨超过 6.5%，多头正在寻找亚马逊年底可能出现的反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier this week, analysts at Goldman Sachs named Amazon&nbsp;their top internet stock for 2022.</p><p><blockquote>本周早些时候，高盛分析师将亚马逊评为 2022 年最佳互联网股票。</blockquote></p><p> Nearing new all-time high territory now, let’s look at the charts.</p><p><blockquote>现在接近历史新高，让我们来看看图表。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Trading Amazon Stock</b></p><p><blockquote><b>交易亚马逊股票</b></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55bdcb9f23bb51b493a1ab3a9376f0a9\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Amazon stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>亚马逊股票日线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Earlier this morning I looked at Apple, arguing that this stock and Amazon are both likely to be&nbsp;buy-the-dip candidates going forward.</p><p><blockquote>今天早上早些时候，我看了苹果，认为这只股票和亚马逊都可能成为未来逢低买入的候选者。</blockquote></p><p> It helps that Wedbush analysts laid down a pretty&nbsp;bullish outlook on the Nasdaq&nbsp;(even though they favored Apple as their top FAANG holding).</p><p><blockquote>韦德布什分析师对纳斯达克做出了相当乐观的前景，这很有帮助（尽管他们更看好苹果作为他们最大的FAANG持股）。</blockquote></p><p> Above is a daily chart, highlighting how many times Amazon flirted with a breakout over the $3,550 area.</p><p><blockquote>上面是一张日线图，突出显示了亚马逊有多少次试图突破 3,550 美元区域。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier in the week I tweeted that one day investors would look up and the “train will have left the station.” Is that happening now?</p><p><blockquote>本周早些时候，我在推特上说，总有一天投资者会抬起头来，“火车会离开车站”。现在发生了吗？</blockquote></p><p> Bulls hope so, as they fix their attention on the $3,773 high from July. Not only is that the third-quarter high, but it’s also the all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>多头希望如此，因为他们将注意力集中在 7 月份以来的高点 3,773 美元上。这不仅是第三季度的最高值，也是历史最高值。</blockquote></p><p> A breakout over this level could open the door to the 161.8% extension near $3,975, followed by a possible push over $4,000.</p><p><blockquote>突破这一水平可能会为 3,975 美元附近的 161.8% 扩张打开大门，随后可能突破 4,000 美元。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff98ccb4ff4468d09e6945c88212c4cc\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Weekly chart of Amazon stock.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>亚马逊股票周线图。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Above $4,000 could put an additional push to the $4,125 to $4,150 area in play if we measure an extension from the more recent third-quarter range. That’s shown on the weekly chart above.</p><p><blockquote>如果我们衡量较最近的第三季度区间有所扩大，4,000 美元以上可能会进一步推动 4,125 美元至 4,150 美元的区域。如上图所示。</blockquote></p><p> There is a risk here, too.</p><p><blockquote>这里也有风险。</blockquote></p><p> While Amazon stock looks pretty good right now — especially heading into Black Friday and Cyber Monday — there is a risk that we get some type of reversal or failure near the current $3,775 highs.</p><p><blockquote>虽然亚马逊股票目前看起来相当不错——尤其是在黑色星期五和网络星期一到来之际——但我们有可能在当前 3,775 美元的高点附近出现某种类型的逆转或失败。</blockquote></p><p> After all, the stock looked pretty good in July too, before it ultimately rolled back over. Stay on guard for that type of rug pull, which could put the $3,550 to $3,600 area back in play.</p><p><blockquote>毕竟，在最终回落之前，该股在 7 月份看起来也相当不错。对这种类型的地毯拉动保持警惕，这可能会使 3,550 美元至 3,600 美元的区域重新发挥作用。</blockquote></p><p> However, the weekly chart emphasizes how patience has been rewarded in this stock. Shares tend to go on long consolidation phases before eventually roaring higher.</p><p><blockquote>然而，周线图强调了耐心是如何在这只股票中得到回报的。股价往往会经历漫长的盘整阶段，然后最终飙升。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-amazon-amzn-stock-breakout-new-all-time-highs\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-amazon-amzn-stock-breakout-new-all-time-highs","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152232143","content_text":"Amazon stock is finally looking like it's breaking out. Can it hit $4,000 by year-end?\nAmazon shares have been charging higher lately, up 4.3% last week.\nMany investors have been waiting months — no, quarters — for Amazon to breakout.\nIt didn’t matter that it had strong earnings, good news and a surging Nasdaq and S&P 500.\nIronically, its last two quarterly reports weren't that great and the last one was a rare top- and bottom-line miss.\nHowever, shares bottomed in the first post-earnings session and Amazon stock hasn’t looked back.\nDespite the massive IPO from Rivian on Nov. 10, Amazon really struggled with a breakout over the $3,550 level.\nThat's as it has a stake in Rivian, by the way.\nUp over 6.5% so far this week though and bulls are looking for a potential year-end rally in Amazon.\nEarlier this week, analysts at Goldman Sachs named Amazon their top internet stock for 2022.\nNearing new all-time high territory now, let’s look at the charts.\nTrading Amazon Stock\nDaily chart of Amazon stock.\nEarlier this morning I looked at Apple, arguing that this stock and Amazon are both likely to be buy-the-dip candidates going forward.\nIt helps that Wedbush analysts laid down a pretty bullish outlook on the Nasdaq (even though they favored Apple as their top FAANG holding).\nAbove is a daily chart, highlighting how many times Amazon flirted with a breakout over the $3,550 area.\nEarlier in the week I tweeted that one day investors would look up and the “train will have left the station.” Is that happening now?\nBulls hope so, as they fix their attention on the $3,773 high from July. Not only is that the third-quarter high, but it’s also the all-time high.\nA breakout over this level could open the door to the 161.8% extension near $3,975, followed by a possible push over $4,000.\nWeekly chart of Amazon stock.\nAbove $4,000 could put an additional push to the $4,125 to $4,150 area in play if we measure an extension from the more recent third-quarter range. That’s shown on the weekly chart above.\nThere is a risk here, too.\nWhile Amazon stock looks pretty good right now — especially heading into Black Friday and Cyber Monday — there is a risk that we get some type of reversal or failure near the current $3,775 highs.\nAfter all, the stock looked pretty good in July too, before it ultimately rolled back over. Stay on guard for that type of rug pull, which could put the $3,550 to $3,600 area back in play.\nHowever, the weekly chart emphasizes how patience has been rewarded in this stock. Shares tend to go on long consolidation phases before eventually roaring higher.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":872340595,"gmtCreate":1637449724770,"gmtModify":1637449724909,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Moon","listText":"Moon","text":"Moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/872340595","repostId":"2184384295","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":801,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":878627375,"gmtCreate":1637191784284,"gmtModify":1637191784408,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/878627375","repostId":"2184764854","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1544,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":878394765,"gmtCreate":1637146591408,"gmtModify":1637146607201,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/878394765","repostId":"2184832803","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2184832803","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1637150002,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2184832803?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-11-17 19:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est<blockquote>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2184832803","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est","content":"<p><html><body>Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est</p><p><blockquote><html><body>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est<blockquote>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBaidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est<blockquote>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-11-17 19:53</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><body>Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est</p><p><blockquote><html><body>百度第三季度每股收益 2.28 美元，高于预期 2.01 美元；收入 $4.954B 低于 $4.97B 美国东部时间</body></html></blockquote></p><p></body></html></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BIDU":"百度","09888":"百度集团-SW"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/21/11/24141080/baidu-q3-eps-2-28-beat-2-01-est-revenue-4-954b-missed-4-97b-est","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2184832803","content_text":"Baidu Q3 EPS $2.28 Beat $2.01 Est; Revenue $4.954B Missed $4.97B Est","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"09888":1,"BIDU":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1064,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":871419922,"gmtCreate":1637104899379,"gmtModify":1637104899763,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/871419922","repostId":"2184416881","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":884,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":871410357,"gmtCreate":1637104863880,"gmtModify":1637104864217,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583308786901817","idStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/871410357","repostId":"2184881094","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":609,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":825121233,"gmtCreate":1634211104871,"gmtModify":1634211104950,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/825121233","repostId":"1189777095","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189777095","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1634210967,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1189777095?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-14 19:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Plug Power stock rose another 3.6% in premarket trading<blockquote>普拉格能源股价在盘前交易中又上涨 3.6%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189777095","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Stock in hydrogen technology company Plug Power rose in premarket trading Thursday. A couple things ","content":"<p>Stock in hydrogen technology company&nbsp;Plug Power&nbsp;rose in premarket trading Thursday. A couple things have investors excited. There is a third catalyst coming soon that could give shares another boost.</p><p><blockquote>氢技术公司普拉格能源的股价在周四盘前交易中上涨。有几件事让投资者兴奋不已。第三个催化剂即将到来，可能会再次提振股价。</blockquote></p><p> Plug Power&nbsp;(ticker: PLUG) stock jumped about 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday after rising 12.8% Wednesday.S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are up 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>普拉格能源（股票代码：PLUG）股价继周三上涨 12.8% 后，周四盘前交易中上涨约 3.6%。标准普尔 500 指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别上涨 0.6% 和 0.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e6314f6ece9cd8cf1b1fed8bedaf86a\" tg-width=\"848\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst Stephen Byrd helped things get started Wednesday morning by upgrading shares to Buy from Hold. His price target goes to $40 from $35 a share. Byrd believes the company is well-positioned for a few reasons: the $4 billion in cash on its balance sheet; legislative support for low-carbon emission technologies such as hydrogen; and strategic partnerships, such as a recent partnership formed to make and distribute hydrogen gas in South Korea.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师斯蒂芬·伯德 (Stephen Byrd) 周三上午将股票评级从持有上调至买入，帮助事情开始。他的目标价从每股 35 美元上调至 40 美元。伯德认为，该公司处于有利地位，原因有几个：其资产负债表上有 40 亿美元现金；对氢等低碳排放技术的立法支持；以及战略合作伙伴关系，例如最近建立的在韩国生产和分销氢气的合作伙伴关系。</blockquote></p><p> Plug formed another partnership Wednesday, which is likely intriguing investors. Commercial aerospace giant&nbsp;Airbus&nbsp;(AIR.France) and Plug are working together to investigate green hydrogen for use in air transportation.</p><p><blockquote>Plug 周三又建立了合作伙伴关系，这可能会引起投资者的兴趣。商业航空航天巨头空中客车公司（AIR.France）和Plug正在合作研究用于航空运输的绿色氢。</blockquote></p><p> So-called green hydrogen comes from producing hydrogen gas by passing electricity generated by renewable resources through water. That way, there is no carbon dioxide—the main gas blamed for global climate change—emitted in production. Most hydrogen gas is made from natural gas these days. That process emits carbon dioxide.</p><p><blockquote>所谓绿色氢，来自于通过水传递可再生资源产生的电力来生产氢气。这样，生产过程中就不会排放二氧化碳——全球气候变化的主要气体。如今大多数氢气是由天然气制成的。这个过程会排放二氧化碳。</blockquote></p><p> “We at&nbsp;Airbus&nbsp;see huge potential for green hydrogen to power our future zero-emission aircraft,” said Glenn Llewellyn, Airbus Vice-President, Zero Emission Aircraft, in a joint news release. Plug Power is “a true pioneer in developing green hydrogen infrastructure across the United States, and key points across Europe and Asia.”</p><p><blockquote>“空中客车公司零排放飞机副总裁格伦-卢埃林（Glenn Llewellyn）在一份联合新闻稿中说：”我们空中客车公司看到了绿色氢能为我们未来的零排放飞机提供动力的巨大潜力。普拉格能源是 “在美国发展绿色氢基础设施以及欧洲和亚洲关键点的真正先驱”。</blockquote></p><p> The pair wants to have zero-carbon emission plane by 2035. That would be a plane that looks like today’s jets, but burns hydrogen instead of traditional jet fuel.</p><p><blockquote>两人希望到2035年拥有零碳排放飞机。这将是一架看起来像今天的喷气式飞机，但燃烧的是氢气，而不是传统的喷气燃料。</blockquote></p><p> Those are Wednesday’s catalysts for Plug stock. On Thursday, the company hosts an investor event it is calling a hydrogen symposium—something else investors can look forward to. B. Riley analyst Christopher Souther, in a Tuesday research note, said Plug is likely to increase 2021 guidance and 2024 financial goals at the event.</p><p><blockquote>这些是周三插头股的催化剂。周四，该公司将举办一场投资者活动，称为氢能研讨会，这是投资者可以期待的另一件事。B. Riley 分析师 Christopher Souther 在周二的一份研究报告中表示，Plug 可能会在此次活动中提高 2021 年指引和 2024 年财务目标。</blockquote></p><p> Plug stock is still down about 1% year to date, but has seen some improvement lately. Shares are up 23% over the past month.</p><p><blockquote>今年迄今为止，插头库存仍下跌约 1%，但最近有所改善。过去一个月股价上涨了 23%。</blockquote></p><p> Plug stock had and incredible 2020, rising more than 900%. Shares are up about 73% over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Plug 股票在 2020 年表现令人难以置信，上涨超过 900%。过去 12 个月股价上涨了约 73%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Plug Power stock rose another 3.6% in premarket trading<blockquote>普拉格能源股价在盘前交易中又上涨 3.6%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPlug Power stock rose another 3.6% in premarket trading<blockquote>普拉格能源股价在盘前交易中又上涨 3.6%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-14 19:29</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock in hydrogen technology company&nbsp;Plug Power&nbsp;rose in premarket trading Thursday. A couple things have investors excited. There is a third catalyst coming soon that could give shares another boost.</p><p><blockquote>氢技术公司普拉格能源的股价在周四盘前交易中上涨。有几件事让投资者兴奋不已。第三个催化剂即将到来，可能会再次提振股价。</blockquote></p><p> Plug Power&nbsp;(ticker: PLUG) stock jumped about 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday after rising 12.8% Wednesday.S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are up 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively.</p><p><blockquote>普拉格能源（股票代码：PLUG）股价继周三上涨 12.8% 后，周四盘前交易中上涨约 3.6%。标准普尔 500 指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别上涨 0.6% 和 0.5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e6314f6ece9cd8cf1b1fed8bedaf86a\" tg-width=\"848\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Morgan Stanley analyst Stephen Byrd helped things get started Wednesday morning by upgrading shares to Buy from Hold. His price target goes to $40 from $35 a share. Byrd believes the company is well-positioned for a few reasons: the $4 billion in cash on its balance sheet; legislative support for low-carbon emission technologies such as hydrogen; and strategic partnerships, such as a recent partnership formed to make and distribute hydrogen gas in South Korea.</p><p><blockquote>摩根士丹利分析师斯蒂芬·伯德 (Stephen Byrd) 周三上午将股票评级从持有上调至买入，帮助事情开始。他的目标价从每股 35 美元上调至 40 美元。伯德认为，该公司处于有利地位，原因有几个：其资产负债表上有 40 亿美元现金；对氢等低碳排放技术的立法支持；以及战略合作伙伴关系，例如最近建立的在韩国生产和分销氢气的合作伙伴关系。</blockquote></p><p> Plug formed another partnership Wednesday, which is likely intriguing investors. Commercial aerospace giant&nbsp;Airbus&nbsp;(AIR.France) and Plug are working together to investigate green hydrogen for use in air transportation.</p><p><blockquote>Plug 周三又建立了合作伙伴关系，这可能会引起投资者的兴趣。商业航空航天巨头空中客车公司（AIR.France）和Plug正在合作研究用于航空运输的绿色氢。</blockquote></p><p> So-called green hydrogen comes from producing hydrogen gas by passing electricity generated by renewable resources through water. That way, there is no carbon dioxide—the main gas blamed for global climate change—emitted in production. Most hydrogen gas is made from natural gas these days. That process emits carbon dioxide.</p><p><blockquote>所谓绿色氢，来自于通过水传递可再生资源产生的电力来生产氢气。这样，生产过程中就不会排放二氧化碳——全球气候变化的主要气体。如今大多数氢气是由天然气制成的。这个过程会排放二氧化碳。</blockquote></p><p> “We at&nbsp;Airbus&nbsp;see huge potential for green hydrogen to power our future zero-emission aircraft,” said Glenn Llewellyn, Airbus Vice-President, Zero Emission Aircraft, in a joint news release. Plug Power is “a true pioneer in developing green hydrogen infrastructure across the United States, and key points across Europe and Asia.”</p><p><blockquote>“空中客车公司零排放飞机副总裁格伦-卢埃林（Glenn Llewellyn）在一份联合新闻稿中说：”我们空中客车公司看到了绿色氢能为我们未来的零排放飞机提供动力的巨大潜力。普拉格能源是 “在美国发展绿色氢基础设施以及欧洲和亚洲关键点的真正先驱”。</blockquote></p><p> The pair wants to have zero-carbon emission plane by 2035. That would be a plane that looks like today’s jets, but burns hydrogen instead of traditional jet fuel.</p><p><blockquote>两人希望到2035年拥有零碳排放飞机。这将是一架看起来像今天的喷气式飞机，但燃烧的是氢气，而不是传统的喷气燃料。</blockquote></p><p> Those are Wednesday’s catalysts for Plug stock. On Thursday, the company hosts an investor event it is calling a hydrogen symposium—something else investors can look forward to. B. Riley analyst Christopher Souther, in a Tuesday research note, said Plug is likely to increase 2021 guidance and 2024 financial goals at the event.</p><p><blockquote>这些是周三插头股的催化剂。周四，该公司将举办一场投资者活动，称为氢能研讨会，这是投资者可以期待的另一件事。B. Riley 分析师 Christopher Souther 在周二的一份研究报告中表示，Plug 可能会在此次活动中提高 2021 年指引和 2024 年财务目标。</blockquote></p><p> Plug stock is still down about 1% year to date, but has seen some improvement lately. Shares are up 23% over the past month.</p><p><blockquote>今年迄今为止，插头库存仍下跌约 1%，但最近有所改善。过去一个月股价上涨了 23%。</blockquote></p><p> Plug stock had and incredible 2020, rising more than 900%. Shares are up about 73% over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Plug 股票在 2020 年表现令人难以置信，上涨超过 900%。过去 12 个月股价上涨了约 73%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLUG":"普拉格能源"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189777095","content_text":"Stock in hydrogen technology company Plug Power rose in premarket trading Thursday. A couple things have investors excited. There is a third catalyst coming soon that could give shares another boost.\nPlug Power (ticker: PLUG) stock jumped about 3.6% in premarket trading Thursday after rising 12.8% Wednesday.S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures are up 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively.\n\nMorgan Stanley analyst Stephen Byrd helped things get started Wednesday morning by upgrading shares to Buy from Hold. His price target goes to $40 from $35 a share. Byrd believes the company is well-positioned for a few reasons: the $4 billion in cash on its balance sheet; legislative support for low-carbon emission technologies such as hydrogen; and strategic partnerships, such as a recent partnership formed to make and distribute hydrogen gas in South Korea.\nPlug formed another partnership Wednesday, which is likely intriguing investors. Commercial aerospace giant Airbus (AIR.France) and Plug are working together to investigate green hydrogen for use in air transportation.\nSo-called green hydrogen comes from producing hydrogen gas by passing electricity generated by renewable resources through water. That way, there is no carbon dioxide—the main gas blamed for global climate change—emitted in production. Most hydrogen gas is made from natural gas these days. That process emits carbon dioxide.\n“We at Airbus see huge potential for green hydrogen to power our future zero-emission aircraft,” said Glenn Llewellyn, Airbus Vice-President, Zero Emission Aircraft, in a joint news release. Plug Power is “a true pioneer in developing green hydrogen infrastructure across the United States, and key points across Europe and Asia.”\nThe pair wants to have zero-carbon emission plane by 2035. That would be a plane that looks like today’s jets, but burns hydrogen instead of traditional jet fuel.\nThose are Wednesday’s catalysts for Plug stock. On Thursday, the company hosts an investor event it is calling a hydrogen symposium—something else investors can look forward to. B. Riley analyst Christopher Souther, in a Tuesday research note, said Plug is likely to increase 2021 guidance and 2024 financial goals at the event.\nPlug stock is still down about 1% year to date, but has seen some improvement lately. Shares are up 23% over the past month.\nPlug stock had and incredible 2020, rising more than 900%. Shares are up about 73% over the past 12 months.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLUG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":867857753,"gmtCreate":1633241313152,"gmtModify":1633241313357,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/867857753","repostId":"1195986801","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195986801","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1633237941,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1195986801?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-03 13:12","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Why Tesla's Q3 Numbers Are 'Eye Popping' and Hard to Poke Holes In<blockquote>为什么特斯拉第三季度的数据“令人瞠目结舌”且难以戳破</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195986801","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Tesla, Inc. reported Saturday record quarterly deliveries despite the surrounding turbulence. An analyst at Wedbush Securities sees the performance as \"massive.\". The Tesla Analyst:Daniel Ives maintained an Outperform rating and $1,000 price target for Tesla shares.The Tesla Thesis:Tesla's third-quarter deliveries of 241,000 beat even the bull-case whisper number on the Street, analyst Ives said in a note. The strength, the analyst said, was driven byrobust Model 3/Y salesof 232, 000.Total produ","content":"<p><div> Tesla, Inc. reported Saturday record quarterly deliveries despite the surrounding turbulence. An analyst at Wedbush Securities sees the performance as \"massive.\" The Tesla Analyst:Daniel Ives ...</p><p><blockquote><div>尽管周围动荡，特斯拉公司周六公布的季度交付量仍创下历史新高。Wedbush Securities 的一位分析师认为这一业绩“巨大”。特斯拉分析师：Daniel Ives...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Tesla's Q3 Numbers Are 'Eye Popping' and Hard to Poke Holes In<blockquote>为什么特斯拉第三季度的数据“令人瞠目结舌”且难以戳破</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Tesla's Q3 Numbers Are 'Eye Popping' and Hard to Poke Holes In<blockquote>为什么特斯拉第三季度的数据“令人瞠目结舌”且难以戳破</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Benzinga</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-03 13:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div> Tesla, Inc. reported Saturday record quarterly deliveries despite the surrounding turbulence. An analyst at Wedbush Securities sees the performance as \"massive.\" The Tesla Analyst:Daniel Ives ...</p><p><blockquote><div>尽管周围动荡，特斯拉公司周六公布的季度交付量仍创下历史新高。Wedbush Securities 的一位分析师认为这一业绩“巨大”。特斯拉分析师：Daniel Ives...</div></blockquote></p><p>  <a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in\">网页链接</a>  </div> </p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in\">网页连接</a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in\">Benzinga</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/21/10/23207870/why-teslas-q3-numbers-are-eye-popping-and-hard-to-poke-holes-in","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195986801","content_text":"Tesla, Inc. reported Saturday record quarterly deliveries despite the surrounding turbulence. An analyst at Wedbush Securities sees the performance as \"massive.\"\nThe Tesla Analyst:Daniel Ives maintained an Outperform rating and $1,000 price target for Tesla shares.\nThe Tesla Thesis:Tesla's third-quarter deliveries of 241,000 beat even the bull-case whisper number on the Street, analyst Ives said in a note. The strength, the analyst said, was driven byrobust Model 3/Y salesof 232, 000.\nTotal production in the quarter was 238,000, about 10,000 ahead of Wedbush's and Street estimates, the analyst said.\n\"Taking a step back, with the chip shortage a major overhang on the auto space and logistical issues globally, these delivery numbers were \"eye-popping\" and speak to an EV demand trajectory that looks quite robust for Tesla heading into 4Q and 2022,\" Ives wrote in the note.\nWedbush's estimate of 150,000 deliveries for September, according to the analyst, is a clear indicator of the green tidal wave taking hold for Tesla across the board. China demand may have rebounded in the quarter and will be a focus for the bulls digesting these results, he added.\n\"In a nutshell, these numbers are hard to poke holes in and will be a major feather in the cap for the bulls on Monday morning and should improve broader sentiment on the EV space as a whole,\" Wedbush said.\nTesla Price Action:Tesla shares closed Friday's session down 0.03% at $775.22 and were down an incremental 0.03% in after-hours trading.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":498,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":802611606,"gmtCreate":1627776283705,"gmtModify":1633756579394,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"To the moon","listText":"To the moon","text":"To the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802611606","repostId":"1154216466","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154216466","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627713678,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1154216466?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154216466","media":"Barron's","summary":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson Unive","content":"<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p><p><blockquote><i>关于作者：托马斯·W·黑兹利特是H.H。麦考利是克莱姆森大学经济学捐赠教授，曾担任联邦通信委员会首席经济学家。他的最新著作是</i>政治光谱：无线技术的动荡解放，从赫伯特·胡佛到智能手机。</blockquote></p><p> Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p><p><blockquote>大型科技公司正处于反垄断的风口浪尖。但在司法部试图拆分谷歌或苹果等公司之前，它应该回顾一下 T&amp;T 与时代华纳合并的历史和最终结果。</blockquote></p><p> The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p><p><blockquote>司法部花费了大量时间和资源阻止 AT&amp;T 收购时代华纳，这标志着司法部 40 多年来首次挑战重大垂直合并。尽管政府尽了最大努力，包括向华盛顿巡回法院提出上诉，但还是没有成功，时间表明，它的担忧显然一直是错误的。合并没有导致价格上涨、项目中断，甚至没有给公司带来任何明显的优势。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p><p><blockquote>2016 年 10 月，美国电话电报公司宣布计划收购时代华纳。唐纳德-特朗普的总统竞选团队在一份声明中否决了这一合并： “美国电话电报公司.现在正试图收购时代华纳，从而收购狂热反特朗普的 CNN。唐纳德-特朗普绝不会批准这样的交易”。特朗普上任后，司法部采取行动阻止了这一交易。</blockquote></p><p> In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p><p><blockquote>2017 年，司法部向法院投诉称，合并将允许 AT&amp;T “利用时代华纳的 '必备 '网络，如 CNN、TNT、TBS 和 HBO，提高向康卡斯特或 DISH 等竞争对手有线电视分销商收取的费用，从而 “大大减少视频领域的竞争”。收购了国家卫星运营商 DirecTV 的 AT&amp;T 可能会威胁 “停电 ”，剥夺竞争对手分销商的关键节目--他们的用户随后会退出并涌向 DirecTV（AT&amp;T），以便继续在 TNT 上观看 CNN 或 NBA 季后赛。不仅主要的电视和有线电视系统会受到损害，新兴的在线流媒体服务也会受到挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p><p><blockquote>政府的案例集中在 “垂直杠杆”上，即一家公司使用两种互补的产品，使竞争对手更难在各自的市场上竞争。在这种情况下，AT&amp;T 将视频内容创作与视频节目发行相结合；指控称，这两个领域的竞争对手都可能受到伤害。然而，正如在对垂直一体化公司的研究中广泛发现的那样，联合运营提高了消费者的幸福感，这显然会带来效率。好市多（Costco）的买家急于snap好市多（Costco）供应的柯克兰（Kirkland）产品，如果这些产品能提高价格或质量，零售商就会囤积柯克兰（Kirkland）产品。因此，我们需要的是事实，而不仅仅是一个故事。地区法院法官 Richard J. Leon 认为，司法部的案件 “远不能证明其.理论的有效性”。</blockquote></p><p> Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p><p><blockquote>除了此案的政治色彩之外，还有充分的历史理由怀疑官方的投诉。一家有线电视节目主持人近年来多次与一家视频发行商合并（或分拆）。计量经济学分析表明，垂直整合并没有导致更高的价格。正如司法部承认的那样，垂直整合也不会导致 “停电”。华盛顿特区巡回法院的三名法官组成的合议庭确认了莱昂法官的意见，认为 “近年来，随着 Netflix 和 Hulu 等公司的出现，该行业变得充满活力”。</blockquote></p><p> Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，共同拥有 DirecTV 和时代华纳并没有多大优势，更不用说垄断了。尽管大流行病对视频内容的需求大大增加，但竞争对手很快就吃了 AT&amp;T-时代华纳的午餐。AT&amp;T 在 2015 年收购 DirecTV 时支付了 670 亿美元。2021 年 2 月，随着 DirecTV 的卫星用户群崩溃，分拆业务的估值为 163 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p><p><blockquote>美国电话电报公司随后卸载了时代华纳的视频资产。一家新企业——华纳兄弟探索频道——正在分拆并与探索频道（探索频道、动物星球、TLC、HGTV、食品网络等）合并。这家只做内容的公司自愿切断了DOJ批评为容易垄断金钱的链接。由于反竞争捆绑的指控，它已被放弃，因为不值得麻烦。 AT&amp;T 股东获得 430 亿美元，不到三年前 AT&amp;T 为时代华纳花费的 1000 亿美元（债务和股权）的一半。政府提出的反竞争垂直一体化方案被证明是一种幻想。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p><p><blockquote>AT&amp;T 的举动值得数十亿股东损失所带来的蔑视。愤世嫉俗者可能会建议加强反垄断法，以防止此类公司错误，而忽略了经济处罚——比反垄断执法者可能处理的任何事情都更可靠、更严厉——显然已经到位。但是很少有人注意到这个具有讽刺意味的政治传奇。政策制定者们正在全力制定法规，以加强对科技领域的反垄断起诉，而美国电话电报公司（AT&amp;T）在视频中却未能做到这一点。众议员普拉米拉-贾亚帕尔（Pramila Jayapal，民主党-华盛顿州）和众议员兰斯-古登（Lance Gooden，共和党-德克萨斯州）提出了 “终止垄断平台法案”，该法案将限制在线服务的垂直合并。至少还有五项新的反垄断规则法案已经出台。</blockquote></p><p> Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p><p><blockquote>此类政策不仅可能是昂贵的法律转移，还会阻碍为客户点燃令人兴奋的新选择的创新。在推出Roku后，Netflix 已将流媒体整合到电影制作中。Hulu 由新闻集团（Fox）和 NBC-Universal（Comcast）创建。亚马逊 Prime Video、Sling、YouTube TV、苹果电视台、Disney Plus、HBO Max 和派拉蒙 Plus——每个都扩展了大型媒体或电子商务平台。每一个都是从对更好产品的追求演变而来的。将创业视为嫌疑人只会加剧目前扰乱在线娱乐市场的混乱。美国电话电报公司惨痛地认识到，拥有互补产品并不能保证成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAntitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First<blockquote>反垄断活动家想要全力以赴。这是他们应该首先考虑的一个教训</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barron's</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 14:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p><p><blockquote><i>关于作者：托马斯·W·黑兹利特是H.H。麦考利是克莱姆森大学经济学捐赠教授，曾担任联邦通信委员会首席经济学家。他的最新著作是</i>政治光谱：无线技术的动荡解放，从赫伯特·胡佛到智能手机。</blockquote></p><p> Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p><p><blockquote>大型科技公司正处于反垄断的风口浪尖。但在司法部试图拆分谷歌或苹果等公司之前，它应该回顾一下 T&amp;T 与时代华纳合并的历史和最终结果。</blockquote></p><p> The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p><p><blockquote>司法部花费了大量时间和资源阻止 AT&amp;T 收购时代华纳，这标志着司法部 40 多年来首次挑战重大垂直合并。尽管政府尽了最大努力，包括向华盛顿巡回法院提出上诉，但还是没有成功，时间表明，它的担忧显然一直是错误的。合并没有导致价格上涨、项目中断，甚至没有给公司带来任何明显的优势。</blockquote></p><p> In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p><p><blockquote>2016 年 10 月，美国电话电报公司宣布计划收购时代华纳。唐纳德-特朗普的总统竞选团队在一份声明中否决了这一合并： “美国电话电报公司.现在正试图收购时代华纳，从而收购狂热反特朗普的 CNN。唐纳德-特朗普绝不会批准这样的交易”。特朗普上任后，司法部采取行动阻止了这一交易。</blockquote></p><p> In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p><p><blockquote>2017 年，司法部向法院投诉称，合并将允许 AT&amp;T “利用时代华纳的 '必备 '网络，如 CNN、TNT、TBS 和 HBO，提高向康卡斯特或 DISH 等竞争对手有线电视分销商收取的费用，从而 “大大减少视频领域的竞争”。收购了国家卫星运营商 DirecTV 的 AT&amp;T 可能会威胁 “停电 ”，剥夺竞争对手分销商的关键节目--他们的用户随后会退出并涌向 DirecTV（AT&amp;T），以便继续在 TNT 上观看 CNN 或 NBA 季后赛。不仅主要的电视和有线电视系统会受到损害，新兴的在线流媒体服务也会受到挤压。</blockquote></p><p> The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p><p><blockquote>政府的案例集中在 “垂直杠杆”上，即一家公司使用两种互补的产品，使竞争对手更难在各自的市场上竞争。在这种情况下，AT&amp;T 将视频内容创作与视频节目发行相结合；指控称，这两个领域的竞争对手都可能受到伤害。然而，正如在对垂直一体化公司的研究中广泛发现的那样，联合运营提高了消费者的幸福感，这显然会带来效率。好市多（Costco）的买家急于snap好市多（Costco）供应的柯克兰（Kirkland）产品，如果这些产品能提高价格或质量，零售商就会囤积柯克兰（Kirkland）产品。因此，我们需要的是事实，而不仅仅是一个故事。地区法院法官 Richard J. Leon 认为，司法部的案件 “远不能证明其.理论的有效性”。</blockquote></p><p> Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p><p><blockquote>除了此案的政治色彩之外，还有充分的历史理由怀疑官方的投诉。一家有线电视节目主持人近年来多次与一家视频发行商合并（或分拆）。计量经济学分析表明，垂直整合并没有导致更高的价格。正如司法部承认的那样，垂直整合也不会导致 “停电”。华盛顿特区巡回法院的三名法官组成的合议庭确认了莱昂法官的意见，认为 “近年来，随着 Netflix 和 Hulu 等公司的出现，该行业变得充满活力”。</blockquote></p><p> Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p><p><blockquote>事实证明，共同拥有 DirecTV 和时代华纳并没有多大优势，更不用说垄断了。尽管大流行病对视频内容的需求大大增加，但竞争对手很快就吃了 AT&amp;T-时代华纳的午餐。AT&amp;T 在 2015 年收购 DirecTV 时支付了 670 亿美元。2021 年 2 月，随着 DirecTV 的卫星用户群崩溃，分拆业务的估值为 163 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p><p><blockquote>美国电话电报公司随后卸载了时代华纳的视频资产。一家新企业——华纳兄弟探索频道——正在分拆并与探索频道（探索频道、动物星球、TLC、HGTV、食品网络等）合并。这家只做内容的公司自愿切断了DOJ批评为容易垄断金钱的链接。由于反竞争捆绑的指控，它已被放弃，因为不值得麻烦。 AT&amp;T 股东获得 430 亿美元，不到三年前 AT&amp;T 为时代华纳花费的 1000 亿美元（债务和股权）的一半。政府提出的反竞争垂直一体化方案被证明是一种幻想。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p><p><blockquote>AT&amp;T 的举动值得数十亿股东损失所带来的蔑视。愤世嫉俗者可能会建议加强反垄断法，以防止此类公司错误，而忽略了经济处罚——比反垄断执法者可能处理的任何事情都更可靠、更严厉——显然已经到位。但是很少有人注意到这个具有讽刺意味的政治传奇。政策制定者们正在全力制定法规，以加强对科技领域的反垄断起诉，而美国电话电报公司（AT&amp;T）在视频中却未能做到这一点。众议员普拉米拉-贾亚帕尔（Pramila Jayapal，民主党-华盛顿州）和众议员兰斯-古登（Lance Gooden，共和党-德克萨斯州）提出了 “终止垄断平台法案”，该法案将限制在线服务的垂直合并。至少还有五项新的反垄断规则法案已经出台。</blockquote></p><p> Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p><p><blockquote>此类政策不仅可能是昂贵的法律转移，还会阻碍为客户点燃令人兴奋的新选择的创新。在推出Roku后，Netflix 已将流媒体整合到电影制作中。Hulu 由新闻集团（Fox）和 NBC-Universal（Comcast）创建。亚马逊 Prime Video、Sling、YouTube TV、苹果电视台、Disney Plus、HBO Max 和派拉蒙 Plus——每个都扩展了大型媒体或电子商务平台。每一个都是从对更好产品的追求演变而来的。将创业视为嫌疑人只会加剧目前扰乱在线娱乐市场的混乱。美国电话电报公司惨痛地认识到，拥有互补产品并不能保证成功。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3\">Barron's</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154216466","content_text":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest book isThe Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.\nBig Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&T-Time Warner merger.\nThe DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.\nIn October 2016 AT&Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.  Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement:  “AT&T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”  With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.\nIn 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.\nThe government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets. Here, AT&T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt. Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality. So facts, not just a story, are needed.  District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”\nAside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years. Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”\nOwning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion. In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.\nAnd AT&Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.\nAT&T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&T so spectacularly failed to do in video.  Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.\nNot only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast). Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":593,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806474782,"gmtCreate":1627691806646,"gmtModify":1633757129276,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"To the moon","listText":"To the moon","text":"To the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806474782","repostId":"1152039134","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152039134","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689014,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1152039134?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood 的 IPO 失败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152039134","media":"The Street","summary":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor","content":"<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>从一个知道这个过程的人那里，这个过程真的有缺陷。Robinhood应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>) - 获取报告是否采取了哪些措施来避免 IPO 失败？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能谈论周四发生了什么，谁负责，谁主张什么。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前当TheStreet.com上市时我的论点。首先，作为创始人，我决心奖励所有订户股票，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不在桌面上留下很多，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票由好手放置，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到这个过程中，并通过批量市价订单和将股票开得太高，然后一路做空来劫持开盘价。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给订户。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>其次，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小流行的地方，所以每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，超越横梁的订单，即那些下市价订单的订单，是由一家名为奈特证券（Knight Securities）的机构批发的，而不是承销商高盛（Goldman Sachs），它以 62 美元的价格开盘——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少。它是如此混乱——交易价格为 66 美元，就像 Robinhood 交易价格为 39 美元并进行变动一样，然后就再也没有卖得更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的人都赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖的人都赚了钱。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数都是在开幕式上买的，除了大狗，我疏远了所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程在让客户进来的同时，没有给它定价，所以Robinhood把钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是有可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们就知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我总是后悔发生的事。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它是多么可怕所震惊，没有“采取长远的观点”，因为长远的观点很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只这样做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易有多糟糕，尽管它在承销商和委托人的管辖范围内，所以罗宾汉在桌面上留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood 的 IPO 失败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood 的 IPO 失败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>从一个知道这个过程的人那里，这个过程真的有缺陷。Robinhood应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>) - 获取报告是否采取了哪些措施来避免 IPO 失败？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能谈论周四发生了什么，谁负责，谁主张什么。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前当TheStreet.com上市时我的论点。首先，作为创始人，我决心奖励所有订户股票，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不在桌面上留下很多，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票由好手放置，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到这个过程中，并通过批量市价订单和将股票开得太高，然后一路做空来劫持开盘价。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给订户。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>其次，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小流行的地方，所以每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，超越横梁的订单，即那些下市价订单的订单，是由一家名为奈特证券（Knight Securities）的机构批发的，而不是承销商高盛（Goldman Sachs），它以 62 美元的价格开盘——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少。它是如此混乱——交易价格为 66 美元，就像 Robinhood 交易价格为 39 美元并进行变动一样，然后就再也没有卖得更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的人都赔钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖的人都赚了钱。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数都是在开幕式上买的，除了大狗，我疏远了所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程在让客户进来的同时，没有给它定价，所以Robinhood把钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是有可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们就知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我总是后悔发生的事。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它是多么可怕所震惊，没有“采取长远的观点”，因为长远的观点很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只这样做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易有多糟糕，尽管它在承销商和委托人的管辖范围内，所以罗宾汉在桌面上留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOOD":"Robinhood"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152039134","content_text":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.\nI can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.\nSecond, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?\nThird, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.\nI lost on every single point.\nThe underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.\nSecond, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.\nThird, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.\nEveryone who bought that day lost money.\nEveryone who sold that day made money.\nNo subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.\nIt is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.\nI always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.\nWhy do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.\nSo, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.\nGreed?\nStupidity?\nHow about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.\nJust like the offering ofTheStreet.com.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HOOD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":555,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":858455434,"gmtCreate":1635118330792,"gmtModify":1635118331042,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858455434","repostId":"2178808449","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":416,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":812798181,"gmtCreate":1630623032943,"gmtModify":1632470311690,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/812798181","repostId":"2164829818","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":440,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":875181707,"gmtCreate":1637624899026,"gmtModify":1637624899133,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875181707","repostId":"2185306806","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":827340113,"gmtCreate":1634427348225,"gmtModify":1634427348481,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/827340113","repostId":"2175146556","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":675,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":839629362,"gmtCreate":1629157567356,"gmtModify":1633687025564,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Ogogo","listText":"Ogogo","text":"Ogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/839629362","repostId":"2160278866","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":322,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894131516,"gmtCreate":1628810723035,"gmtModify":1633689377690,"author":{"id":"3583308786901817","authorId":"3583308786901817","name":"Keesl2216","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5a5bc28fd3466f4026f379714f28e0","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3583308786901817","authorIdStr":"3583308786901817"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"To the moon","listText":"To the moon","text":"To the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/894131516","repostId":"2159265031","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":506,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}