+关注
shyan1314
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
26
关注
4
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
shyan1314
2021-09-14
$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$
Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?
shyan1314
2021-08-28
Tell me your opinion about this news...
Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-08-18
Like n comment thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-08-06
Comment n like thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-07-19
Commen and like
Morgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be "Hotter But Shorter" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-07-18
Wow
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-07-18
Like n comment
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-07-07
Like n comment
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-28
Like n comment
The Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-06-25
Comment and like thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-18
Like and comment pls
CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-06-17
Line and comment thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-15
Comment n like pls
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-14
Comment n like thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-12
Comment n like, thanks
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-11
Comment n like thx
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-10
Comment n like thx
抱歉,原内容已删除
shyan1314
2021-06-09
Help comment and like thanks
S&P 500 closes little changed as "meme stocks" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-06-08
Comment n like pls
SEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote>
shyan1314
2021-06-05
Ok ba
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3582537029352499","uuid":"3582537029352499","gmtCreate":1619443617179,"gmtModify":1621261610718,"name":"shyan1314","pinyin":"shyan1314","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":26,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.09.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":882097426,"gmtCreate":1631629795265,"gmtModify":1631884763967,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S51.SI\">$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$</a>Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S51.SI\">$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$</a>Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","text":"$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/882097426","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1616,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813312078,"gmtCreate":1630130879495,"gmtModify":1704956410646,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813312078","repostId":"1162964424","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162964424","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630111098,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162964424?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-28 08:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162964424","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is con","content":"<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些组件的价格上涨,苹果的iPhone 13可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或者那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待更深入地了解他们的口袋。DigiTimes报道称,由于零部件通胀,苹果的iPhone 13可能会在下个月以更高的价格推出。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是个坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,苹果公司可能会成为一个巨大的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>怎么回事?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max机型售价高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高3%至5%,这可能会导致尚未公布的iPhone 13价格出现类似上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能试图提高价格,而不相信这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响。苹果或许有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>引用吉姆·克莱默的话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市最令人担忧的阻力之一是通胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致2021-2022年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高的生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会表现出色。这是Mad Money的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时……我想让你问问自己,如果公司提价,你会对提价麻木不仁吗?有哪些公司可以提价而不会激怒你?去买他们的股票。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么涨价也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界真正的运作方式。价格的变化往往会对一些关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果更高的价格不会对售出的单位产生太大影响或根本没有影响,那么这对收入以及最有可能的盈利来说是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一个需要考虑的问题是价格上涨是否完全或仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设是后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。许多移动部件所呈现的复杂性使得很难确定更昂贵的iPhone未来可能会如何影响苹果的财务报表。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-28 08:38</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些组件的价格上涨,苹果的iPhone 13可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或者那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待更深入地了解他们的口袋。DigiTimes报道称,由于零部件通胀,苹果的iPhone 13可能会在下个月以更高的价格推出。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是个坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,苹果公司可能会成为一个巨大的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>怎么回事?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max机型售价高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高3%至5%,这可能会导致尚未公布的iPhone 13价格出现类似上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能试图提高价格,而不相信这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响。苹果或许有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>引用吉姆·克莱默的话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市最令人担忧的阻力之一是通胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致2021-2022年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高的生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会表现出色。这是Mad Money的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时……我想让你问问自己,如果公司提价,你会对提价麻木不仁吗?有哪些公司可以提价而不会激怒你?去买他们的股票。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么涨价也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界真正的运作方式。价格的变化往往会对一些关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果更高的价格不会对售出的单位产生太大影响或根本没有影响,那么这对收入以及最有可能的盈利来说是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一个需要考虑的问题是价格上涨是否完全或仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设是后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。许多移动部件所呈现的复杂性使得很难确定更昂贵的iPhone未来可能会如何影响苹果的财务报表。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162964424","content_text":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.\nIPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.\nBad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.\nFigure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.\nWhat happened?\nThe iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.\nIt is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.\nFigure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.\nA quote from Jim Cramer\nOne of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.\nGenerally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:\n\n “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.”\n\nThe impact to the P&L\nAre higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.\nHolding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.\nHowever, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.\nThe other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833423036,"gmtCreate":1629256596525,"gmtModify":1631884872575,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment thanks ","listText":"Like n comment thanks ","text":"Like n comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833423036","repostId":"2160789201","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1815,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893390398,"gmtCreate":1628235961314,"gmtModify":1631884872590,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thanks ","listText":"Comment n like thanks ","text":"Comment n like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893390398","repostId":"1110795702","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1886,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171376593,"gmtCreate":1626709282712,"gmtModify":1631884872600,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Commen and like ","listText":"Commen and like ","text":"Commen and like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171376593","repostId":"1146536243","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146536243","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626683272,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146536243?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 16:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Morgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146536243","media":"zerohedge","summary":"This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.","content":"<p>We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.</p><p><blockquote>我们认为这个经济周期将是正常的、强劲的、短暂的。这些假设中的每一个都受到市场的激烈争论。每一项都是我们投资策略的关键。</blockquote></p><p> The debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.</p><p><blockquote>关于周期“常态”的争论是不言自明的。毫不夸张地说,疫情造成了有记录以来最大幅度的产出下降。随后,在政策支持的帮助下,经济活动迅速回升。将这种情况视为独特的,不同于其他周期性经历的理由是,这种暴力的下跌和上涨从未允许传统的“重置”。</blockquote></p><p> But 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.</p><p><blockquote>但市场中的“正常”是一个有趣的概念,记忆的粗糙边缘往往会随着时间的推移而变得光滑和抛光。2003-07年的周期以大萧条以来最大的银行和房地产危机结束。1992-2000年的周期以巨大的股票泡沫破裂、广泛的会计欺诈和难以言喻的悲剧而告终。“正常”周期在理论上很好,但在实践中更难。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.</p><p><blockquote>相反,让我们考虑一下为什么我们使用术语“周期”。经济和市场往往遵循周期性模式,这些模式往往会在市场表现中显现出来。我们关心的是那些模式,如果它们仍然适用,它们可以在不确定的地形中提供有用的指导。</blockquote></p><p> Was last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.</p><p><blockquote>去年的衰退之前是否存在收益率曲线倒挂、低波动性、低失业率、高消费者信心和股市广度收窄等周期后期条件?是的。由此产生的股票、信贷、收益率和收益率曲线的低谷是否符合市场和经济低点之间的通常节奏?他们做到了。随后反弹的领头羊是否是通常的早期周期赢家,如小型股和周期性股票、高收益信贷和工业金属?他们是。</blockquote></p><p> If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should <i>continue</i> to do so.</p><p><blockquote>如果它像鸭子一样走路,像鸭子一样嘎嘎叫,我们认为这是一个正常的循环。或者这些事情实际上是正常的。如果到目前为止已经发生了很多“正常”的循环行为,那么它应该<i>继续</i>这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).</p><p><blockquote>具体来说,这与市场复苏时的表现模式有关。随着复苏的推进,这些模式应该会发生变化。正如我的同事迈克尔·威尔逊所指出的,我们认为我们正在进入周期中期市场,尽管距离经济活动低点仅16个月。我们看到当前状况与2004年上半年有许多相似之处,2004年上半年是大幅通货再膨胀反弹之后的周期中期。重要的是,尽管最近对增长感到担忧,但我们认为全球复苏将继续推进(见增长恐慌周年纪念,2021年7月11日)。</blockquote></p><p> Because one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.<b>It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.</b></p><p><blockquote>因为人们总能找到适合他们特定周期观点的指标,所以我们长期以来一直是综合指数的粉丝。这就是我们的“周期模型”,它结合了美国宏观、信贷周期和企业侵略性的十个指标,以衡量我们在市场周期中的位置。在2019年6月进入周期后期“低迷”和2020年4月进入周期早期“修复”后,该指数飙升。<b>它上升得如此之快,以至于已经过了下一个阶段(“复苏”),直接进入了“扩张”。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41879c4f66b33597ee236bdd52841004\" tg-width=\"904\" tg-height=\"490\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Thisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',<b>and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends</b>. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.<b>It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.</b>This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.</p><p><blockquote>这很不寻常。“扩张”意味着捕捉“比正常情况更好且正在改善”的条件,<b>自1980年以来,“低迷”结束后平均需要35个月才能实现这一目标</b>它的迅速到来表明,在巨大的政策支持下,经济正在迅速复苏。<b>这也暗示了另一种可能性:这个更热的周期可能会更短。</b>这是我们的论点,它体现在我们的定量测量中。</blockquote></p><p> All this has a number of implications:</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都有许多含义:</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul> <li><b>The shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases</b>. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.</li> <li><b>In many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low</b>. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.</li> <li><b>In equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios</b>. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.</li> <li><b>Interest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model</b>. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.</li> </ul> This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>周期越短,信贷相对于其他风险资产越差;信贷从“繁荣”中获得的收益较少,如果下一次衰退提前到来,信贷就会面临风险,并且随着企业信心的增强,信贷将面临更多的供应</b>在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国IG和HY Credit N1200万超额回报分别比平均水平差29个基点和161个基点。</li><li><b>在其中许多时期,尽管违约率仍然很低,但信贷表现却参差不齐</b>投资者应该尝试承担违约风险而不是利差风险:我们的信用策略师喜欢持有CDX HY 0-15%,并用CDX IG付款人利差进行对冲。</li><li><b>在股票方面,我们认为我们的模型支持投资组合更加平衡</b>我们看好美国和欧洲的医疗保健行业,因为该行业具有几个良好的因素:质量、低估值、高利差和低波动性。从全球来看,欧洲和日本的股市往往跑赢“中期周期”,我们认为它们可以再次这样做。</li><li><b>利率对复苏过于悲观。在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国10年期国债1200万奈拉回报率比平均水平低97个基点</b>.Guneet Dhingra和我们的美国利率策略团队在全球资产配置中转移了跑输大盘美国10年期国债,而我们反过来又转移了跑输大盘政府债券。</li></ul>这种循环是不寻常的。大多数“正常”周期都是。我们认为复苏是可持续的,而且更有可能“更热、更短”。出售国债并相信扩张。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 16:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.</p><p><blockquote>我们认为这个经济周期将是正常的、强劲的、短暂的。这些假设中的每一个都受到市场的激烈争论。每一项都是我们投资策略的关键。</blockquote></p><p> The debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.</p><p><blockquote>关于周期“常态”的争论是不言自明的。毫不夸张地说,疫情造成了有记录以来最大幅度的产出下降。随后,在政策支持的帮助下,经济活动迅速回升。将这种情况视为独特的,不同于其他周期性经历的理由是,这种暴力的下跌和上涨从未允许传统的“重置”。</blockquote></p><p> But 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.</p><p><blockquote>但市场中的“正常”是一个有趣的概念,记忆的粗糙边缘往往会随着时间的推移而变得光滑和抛光。2003-07年的周期以大萧条以来最大的银行和房地产危机结束。1992-2000年的周期以巨大的股票泡沫破裂、广泛的会计欺诈和难以言喻的悲剧而告终。“正常”周期在理论上很好,但在实践中更难。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.</p><p><blockquote>相反,让我们考虑一下为什么我们使用术语“周期”。经济和市场往往遵循周期性模式,这些模式往往会在市场表现中显现出来。我们关心的是那些模式,如果它们仍然适用,它们可以在不确定的地形中提供有用的指导。</blockquote></p><p> Was last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.</p><p><blockquote>去年的衰退之前是否存在收益率曲线倒挂、低波动性、低失业率、高消费者信心和股市广度收窄等周期后期条件?是的。由此产生的股票、信贷、收益率和收益率曲线的低谷是否符合市场和经济低点之间的通常节奏?他们做到了。随后反弹的领头羊是否是通常的早期周期赢家,如小型股和周期性股票、高收益信贷和工业金属?他们是。</blockquote></p><p> If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should <i>continue</i> to do so.</p><p><blockquote>如果它像鸭子一样走路,像鸭子一样嘎嘎叫,我们认为这是一个正常的循环。或者这些事情实际上是正常的。如果到目前为止已经发生了很多“正常”的循环行为,那么它应该<i>继续</i>这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).</p><p><blockquote>具体来说,这与市场复苏时的表现模式有关。随着复苏的推进,这些模式应该会发生变化。正如我的同事迈克尔·威尔逊所指出的,我们认为我们正在进入周期中期市场,尽管距离经济活动低点仅16个月。我们看到当前状况与2004年上半年有许多相似之处,2004年上半年是大幅通货再膨胀反弹之后的周期中期。重要的是,尽管最近对增长感到担忧,但我们认为全球复苏将继续推进(见增长恐慌周年纪念,2021年7月11日)。</blockquote></p><p> Because one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.<b>It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.</b></p><p><blockquote>因为人们总能找到适合他们特定周期观点的指标,所以我们长期以来一直是综合指数的粉丝。这就是我们的“周期模型”,它结合了美国宏观、信贷周期和企业侵略性的十个指标,以衡量我们在市场周期中的位置。在2019年6月进入周期后期“低迷”和2020年4月进入周期早期“修复”后,该指数飙升。<b>它上升得如此之快,以至于已经过了下一个阶段(“复苏”),直接进入了“扩张”。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41879c4f66b33597ee236bdd52841004\" tg-width=\"904\" tg-height=\"490\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Thisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',<b>and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends</b>. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.<b>It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.</b>This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.</p><p><blockquote>这很不寻常。“扩张”意味着捕捉“比正常情况更好且正在改善”的条件,<b>自1980年以来,“低迷”结束后平均需要35个月才能实现这一目标</b>它的迅速到来表明,在巨大的政策支持下,经济正在迅速复苏。<b>这也暗示了另一种可能性:这个更热的周期可能会更短。</b>这是我们的论点,它体现在我们的定量测量中。</blockquote></p><p> All this has a number of implications:</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都有许多含义:</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul> <li><b>The shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases</b>. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.</li> <li><b>In many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low</b>. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.</li> <li><b>In equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios</b>. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.</li> <li><b>Interest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model</b>. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.</li> </ul> This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>周期越短,信贷相对于其他风险资产越差;信贷从“繁荣”中获得的收益较少,如果下一次衰退提前到来,信贷就会面临风险,并且随着企业信心的增强,信贷将面临更多的供应</b>在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国IG和HY Credit N1200万超额回报分别比平均水平差29个基点和161个基点。</li><li><b>在其中许多时期,尽管违约率仍然很低,但信贷表现却参差不齐</b>投资者应该尝试承担违约风险而不是利差风险:我们的信用策略师喜欢持有CDX HY 0-15%,并用CDX IG付款人利差进行对冲。</li><li><b>在股票方面,我们认为我们的模型支持投资组合更加平衡</b>我们看好美国和欧洲的医疗保健行业,因为该行业具有几个良好的因素:质量、低估值、高利差和低波动性。从全球来看,欧洲和日本的股市往往跑赢“中期周期”,我们认为它们可以再次这样做。</li><li><b>利率对复苏过于悲观。在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国10年期国债1200万奈拉回报率比平均水平低97个基点</b>.Guneet Dhingra和我们的美国利率策略团队在全球资产配置中转移了跑输大盘美国10年期国债,而我们反过来又转移了跑输大盘政府债券。</li></ul>这种循环是不寻常的。大多数“正常”周期都是。我们认为复苏是可持续的,而且更有可能“更热、更短”。出售国债并相信扩张。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-cycle-will-be-hotter-shorter-usual\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-cycle-will-be-hotter-shorter-usual","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146536243","content_text":"We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.\nThe debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.\nBut 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.\nInstead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.\nWas last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.\nIf it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should continue to do so.\nSpecifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).\nBecause one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.\nThisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.\nAll this has a number of implications:\n\nThe shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.\nIn many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.\nIn equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.\nInterest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.\n\nThis cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1546,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179738284,"gmtCreate":1626576047948,"gmtModify":1631884872615,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179738284","repostId":"1183956332","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1281,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179244293,"gmtCreate":1626540477212,"gmtModify":1631884872627,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179244293","repostId":"1198202103","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2775,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140102650,"gmtCreate":1625634408270,"gmtModify":1631884872642,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140102650","repostId":"1163143630","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1563,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127245233,"gmtCreate":1624853572422,"gmtModify":1631884872664,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/127245233","repostId":"1161283536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161283536","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624850034,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161283536?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-28 11:13","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"The Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161283536","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered ","content":"<p>Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.</p><p><blockquote>香港股市将于周一下午恢复交易,此前该市气象台降低了早些时候导致上午交易取消的暴雨警告。</blockquote></p><p> The Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.</p><p><blockquote>当地时间上午11点过后不久,香港天文台将暴雨警告从黑色下调至红色,这意味着股票交易将于下午1点30分开始。根据香港交易及结算所有限公司的规则。由于黑雨警告,该交易所运营商早些时候取消了证券和衍生品市场的早盘交易,包括沪港通。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.</p><p><blockquote>早些时候,由于恶劣的天气条件,该市教育局暂停了全港的课程。政府将在降低暴雨警告后恢复接种疫苗。</blockquote></p><p> Morning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>该市上次取消早盘交易是在去年10月,当时热带风暴南卡促使当局关闭企业和学校。根据彭博社汇编的数据,今年香港的日均营业额约为1,880亿港元(合242亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p> When the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”</p><p><blockquote>大华继显(香港)有限公司执行董事Steven Leung表示,当市场下午重新开市时,“仍有充足的时间消化周末消息和A股走势。”“最近香港和A股的市场都相对稳定。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-28 11:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.</p><p><blockquote>香港股市将于周一下午恢复交易,此前该市气象台降低了早些时候导致上午交易取消的暴雨警告。</blockquote></p><p> The Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.</p><p><blockquote>当地时间上午11点过后不久,香港天文台将暴雨警告从黑色下调至红色,这意味着股票交易将于下午1点30分开始。根据香港交易及结算所有限公司的规则。由于黑雨警告,该交易所运营商早些时候取消了证券和衍生品市场的早盘交易,包括沪港通。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.</p><p><blockquote>早些时候,由于恶劣的天气条件,该市教育局暂停了全港的课程。政府将在降低暴雨警告后恢复接种疫苗。</blockquote></p><p> Morning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>该市上次取消早盘交易是在去年10月,当时热带风暴南卡促使当局关闭企业和学校。根据彭博社汇编的数据,今年香港的日均营业额约为1,880亿港元(合242亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p> When the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”</p><p><blockquote>大华继显(香港)有限公司执行董事Steven Leung表示,当市场下午重新开市时,“仍有充足的时间消化周末消息和A股走势。”“最近香港和A股的市场都相对稳定。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161283536","content_text":"Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.\nThe Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.\nEarlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.\nMorning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.\nWhen the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3050,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126845582,"gmtCreate":1624553344246,"gmtModify":1631884872664,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment and like thanks ","listText":"Comment and like thanks ","text":"Comment and like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/126845582","repostId":"1198422658","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1549,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":166614637,"gmtCreate":1624005923629,"gmtModify":1631884872677,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/166614637","repostId":"1107863941","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107863941","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624004900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107863941?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-18 16:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107863941","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi","content":"<p>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p><p><blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>蔡周四表示,该交易包括价值1.04亿美元的优先股和9.86亿美元的普通股股权价值,企业价值为29亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>根据该公司的声明,三菱慧聪资本已提出每股56美元现金,较CAI最后收盘价溢价46.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,该交易已获得CAI董事会的一致批准,并补充说,交易完成后,CAI的股票将不再在纽约证券交易所上市。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-18 16:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p><p><blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>蔡周四表示,该交易包括价值1.04亿美元的优先股和9.86亿美元的普通股股权价值,企业价值为29亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>根据该公司的声明,三菱慧聪资本已提出每股56美元现金,较CAI最后收盘价溢价46.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,该交易已获得CAI董事会的一致批准,并补充说,交易完成后,CAI的股票将不再在纽约证券交易所上市。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAI":"Caris Life Sciences, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107863941","content_text":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.\nThe deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.\nMitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.\nThe deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CAI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":543,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161176242,"gmtCreate":1623914541786,"gmtModify":1631888945915,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Line and comment thanks ","listText":"Line and comment thanks ","text":"Line and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/161176242","repostId":"2143379379","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":565,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184759603,"gmtCreate":1623726480802,"gmtModify":1631888945921,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like pls","listText":"Comment n like pls","text":"Comment n like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184759603","repostId":"1102470114","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185350907,"gmtCreate":1623634323709,"gmtModify":1631888945924,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thanks ","listText":"Comment n like thanks ","text":"Comment n like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185350907","repostId":"1167404259","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186854260,"gmtCreate":1623486957250,"gmtModify":1631888945929,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like, thanks ","listText":"Comment n like, thanks ","text":"Comment n like, thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186854260","repostId":"2142204074","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":181123333,"gmtCreate":1623379506022,"gmtModify":1631888945931,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thx","listText":"Comment n like thx","text":"Comment n like thx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/181123333","repostId":"1184070773","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":431,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":183173914,"gmtCreate":1623317769538,"gmtModify":1631888945934,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thx","listText":"Comment n like thx","text":"Comment n like thx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/183173914","repostId":"1111571294","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":691,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":180228850,"gmtCreate":1623207342270,"gmtModify":1631888945938,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Help comment and like thanks","listText":"Help comment and like thanks","text":"Help comment and like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/180228850","repostId":"1128909306","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128909306","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623193560,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1128909306?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-09 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128909306","media":"reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of c","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.</p><p><blockquote>纽约(路透社)-华尔街股市周二难以勉强维持收盘涨幅,因为缺乏明确的市场催化剂使机构投资者保持观望,而散户交易者则推动了模因股的持续上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.</p><p><blockquote>美国三大股指均在接近持平或走高的区间震荡时段结束,标普500和道指收盘距离纪录高位约0.5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数表现最佳,其中亚马逊公司和苹果公司的推动作用最大。</blockquote></p><p>“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥Kingsview资产管理公司的投资组合经理Paul Nolte表示:“我们正在等待通胀数据,等待(美联储)的更多数据,等待财报季。”“今天市场没有太多动力。”</blockquote></p><p>“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特补充道:“我们可能会在7月4日之后才会看到财报季开始。”</blockquote></p><p>The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.</p><p><blockquote>衡量投资者焦虑程度的芝加哥期权交易所波动率指数触及一年多来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.</p><p><blockquote>小型股再次受到持续的模因股票零售狂潮的提振,表现优于大型股。</blockquote></p><p>Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>Clover Health Investments在meme股票中占据榜首,飙升85.8%,成为纳斯达克涨幅最大的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.</p><p><blockquote>其他近期交易量爆炸性的股票,包括游戏驿站公司、Bed Bath&Beyond Inc、Workhorse Group等,收盘上涨7%至12%。</blockquote></p><p>“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特说:“(模因股票)是行动所在,但你把它翻过来,看起来像加密货币,那就一团糟了。”“现在,模因股票正在取代加密货币成为热门,这都是非常宽松的货币政策的结果。”</blockquote></p><p>Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部和全国独立企业联合会的报告似乎证实了劳动力短缺,尽管需求复苏,这可能会给工资带来上行压力,这是更广泛通胀的前兆。</blockquote></p><p>Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者从周四的消费者价格指数数据中寻找有关通胀的进一步线索,以及通胀如何影响美联储收紧货币政策的时间表。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数跌30.42点,或0.09%,报34,599.82点;标普500上涨0.74点,涨幅0.02%,至4,227.26点;纳斯达克综合指数上涨43.19点,涨幅0.31%,至13,924.91点。</blockquote></p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11个主要板块中,非必需消费品涨幅最大,公用事业跌幅最大。</blockquote></p><p>Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>根据中国乘用车协会的数据,特斯拉公司5月份中国制造的电动汽车销量猛增29%,同比增长177%。受此消息影响,该股抹去了最初的涨幅,收盘下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.</p><p><blockquote>西南航空宣布订购34架新737 MAX飞机,提振了波音公司股价,但该飞机制造商股价回吐涨幅,收盘持平。</blockquote></p><p>GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站是与Reddit驱动的轧空现象关系最密切的公司,预计将在周三收盘后公布季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.74比1;在纳斯达克,1.66比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下54个52周新高和1个新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得172个新高和16个新低。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为118.2亿股,而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为107.5亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-09 07:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.</p><p><blockquote>纽约(路透社)-华尔街股市周二难以勉强维持收盘涨幅,因为缺乏明确的市场催化剂使机构投资者保持观望,而散户交易者则推动了模因股的持续上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.</p><p><blockquote>美国三大股指均在接近持平或走高的区间震荡时段结束,标普500和道指收盘距离纪录高位约0.5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数表现最佳,其中亚马逊公司和苹果公司的推动作用最大。</blockquote></p><p>“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥Kingsview资产管理公司的投资组合经理Paul Nolte表示:“我们正在等待通胀数据,等待(美联储)的更多数据,等待财报季。”“今天市场没有太多动力。”</blockquote></p><p>“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特补充道:“我们可能会在7月4日之后才会看到财报季开始。”</blockquote></p><p>The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.</p><p><blockquote>衡量投资者焦虑程度的芝加哥期权交易所波动率指数触及一年多来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.</p><p><blockquote>小型股再次受到持续的模因股票零售狂潮的提振,表现优于大型股。</blockquote></p><p>Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>Clover Health Investments在meme股票中占据榜首,飙升85.8%,成为纳斯达克涨幅最大的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.</p><p><blockquote>其他近期交易量爆炸性的股票,包括游戏驿站公司、Bed Bath&Beyond Inc、Workhorse Group等,收盘上涨7%至12%。</blockquote></p><p>“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特说:“(模因股票)是行动所在,但你把它翻过来,看起来像加密货币,那就一团糟了。”“现在,模因股票正在取代加密货币成为热门,这都是非常宽松的货币政策的结果。”</blockquote></p><p>Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部和全国独立企业联合会的报告似乎证实了劳动力短缺,尽管需求复苏,这可能会给工资带来上行压力,这是更广泛通胀的前兆。</blockquote></p><p>Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者从周四的消费者价格指数数据中寻找有关通胀的进一步线索,以及通胀如何影响美联储收紧货币政策的时间表。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数跌30.42点,或0.09%,报34,599.82点;标普500上涨0.74点,涨幅0.02%,至4,227.26点;纳斯达克综合指数上涨43.19点,涨幅0.31%,至13,924.91点。</blockquote></p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11个主要板块中,非必需消费品涨幅最大,公用事业跌幅最大。</blockquote></p><p>Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>根据中国乘用车协会的数据,特斯拉公司5月份中国制造的电动汽车销量猛增29%,同比增长177%。受此消息影响,该股抹去了最初的涨幅,收盘下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.</p><p><blockquote>西南航空宣布订购34架新737 MAX飞机,提振了波音公司股价,但该飞机制造商股价回吐涨幅,收盘持平。</blockquote></p><p>GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站是与Reddit驱动的轧空现象关系最密切的公司,预计将在周三收盘后公布季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.74比1;在纳斯达克,1.66比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下54个52周新高和1个新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得172个新高和16个新低。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为118.2亿股,而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为107.5亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-closes-little-changed-as-meme-stocks-extend-rally-idUSL2N2NQ2NX\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-closes-little-changed-as-meme-stocks-extend-rally-idUSL2N2NQ2NX","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128909306","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"CLOV":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117896674,"gmtCreate":1623127724298,"gmtModify":1631888945944,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like pls","listText":"Comment n like pls","text":"Comment n like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117896674","repostId":"1128603485","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128603485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623122180,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1128603485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 11:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128603485","media":"wsj","summary":"The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corpora","content":"<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在起草一项提案,该提案将限制公司内部人士在买卖自己公司股票时为避免内幕交易索赔而使用的计划。</blockquote></p><p>Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.</p><p><blockquote>SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)周一在《华尔街日报》首席财务官网络活动上发表讲话时表示,他正在寻求修改管理这些安排的规则,即10b5-1计划。内部人士提前制定计划,并用它们来安排未来的交易。该安排为高管提供了针对因交易时拥有未披露的重大非公开信息而引发的内幕交易索赔的辩护。</blockquote></p><p>The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.</p><p><blockquote>这些计划经常会引起争议,因为在内部人士制定计划时,不需要公开披露计划。一些投资者表示,计划可以被操纵,因为例如,高管可以修改或取消它们。上市公司有时会披露计划,以减轻高管利用非公开信息进行交易的看法。</blockquote></p><p>The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.</p><p><blockquote>SEC于2000年通过了一项创建10b5-1计划的规则。前SEC专员约瑟夫·格伦德菲斯特(Joseph Grundfest)在2013年表示,该机构的官员意识到了该结构的弱点,但该机构尚未完善该规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒周一表示,现在应该改变规则了。“在我看来,这些计划导致了我们内幕交易制度的真正裂痕,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,根据现行规则,监管机构将“确保我们识别并惩罚滥用10b5-1计划的行为”。</blockquote></p><p>A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”</p><p><blockquote>斯坦福大学、宾夕法尼亚大学和华盛顿大学的一组研究人员今年报告称,一些高管利用该计划进行“机会主义、大规模出售公司股票”。</blockquote></p><p>One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.</p><p><blockquote>研究人员表示,一个危险信号是:一些内部人士为计划制定后60天内发生的单笔交易制定了计划。这些交易平均使高管们避免了4%的损失,损失定义为该股在首次出售后六个月内相对于行业同行的表现。</blockquote></p><p>“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”</p><p><blockquote>Morrison&Foerster LLP合伙人、SEC旧金山办事处前负责人Jina Choi表示:“SEC正在关注此事,这一事实是明智且及时的。”“似乎确实存在一些差距,尤其是当你查看学术研究时。”</blockquote></p><p>The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.</p><p><blockquote>Ms.SEC对与10b5-1计划相关的交易采取的执法行动相对较少。崔去年在一份客户报告中写道。SEC的最后一个案件是在2012年1月提起的。</blockquote></p><p>In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.</p><p><blockquote>在一起此类案件中,SEC于2009年指控Countrywide Financial Corp.前首席执行官Angelo Mozilo进行与其制定的10b5-1计划相关的内幕交易。Mozilo在2010年解决了索赔,没有承认或否认不当行为。</blockquote></p><p>An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会的一项提案可能试图通过要求内部人士在计划构思后等待四到六个月再进行交易来降低不当交易的风险;限制计划的取消或修改;披露其采用情况和任何变更;并限制高管可以制定的计划数量。</blockquote></p><p>“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”</p><p><blockquote>“当内部人士确实掌握重要的非公开信息时,他们可以取消计划,”詹斯勒先生说。“对我来说,这似乎有点颠倒。这也可能削弱投资者的信心。”</blockquote></p><p>The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.</p><p><blockquote>机构投资者委员会在2012年和2013年要求SEC控制10b5-1计划,称这些计划容易被滥用。当时,美国证券交易委员会没有修改允许这些计划的规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还谈到了上市公司会计监督委员会的变化,该委员会是一个监督上市公司审计师的机构。SEC上周解雇了PCAOB主席威廉·杜恩克(William Duhnke),他是2017年任命的共和党人。SEC的两名共和党委员批评了此举。</blockquote></p><p>The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒表示,PCAOB没有履行其作为审计标准制定者和执行者的角色和使命。“我支持采取新的方向并重振这个重要的组织,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还表示,美国证券交易委员会正在为特殊目的收购公司起草新的规则或指导方针,这种交易结构在过去一年中作为传统首次公开募股的替代方案而蓬勃发展。Gensler质疑今年筹集了超过1000亿美元的SPAC是否对小投资者有利,因为他们可能不了解其复杂的结构和利益冲突。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>民主党任命的詹斯勒先生于四月份接管了SEC的控制权。在奥巴马政府期间,他是SEC的姐妹机构商品期货交易委员会的主席。在不受监管的交易引发了2008年金融危机后,他在CFTC实施了旨在降低掉期市场风险和提高透明度的规则。</blockquote></p><p>The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒领导下的CFTC将大多数标准化掉期交易推到交易所,并要求它们由清算所担保。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">wsj</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 11:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在起草一项提案,该提案将限制公司内部人士在买卖自己公司股票时为避免内幕交易索赔而使用的计划。</blockquote></p><p>Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.</p><p><blockquote>SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)周一在《华尔街日报》首席财务官网络活动上发表讲话时表示,他正在寻求修改管理这些安排的规则,即10b5-1计划。内部人士提前制定计划,并用它们来安排未来的交易。该安排为高管提供了针对因交易时拥有未披露的重大非公开信息而引发的内幕交易索赔的辩护。</blockquote></p><p>The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.</p><p><blockquote>这些计划经常会引起争议,因为在内部人士制定计划时,不需要公开披露计划。一些投资者表示,计划可以被操纵,因为例如,高管可以修改或取消它们。上市公司有时会披露计划,以减轻高管利用非公开信息进行交易的看法。</blockquote></p><p>The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.</p><p><blockquote>SEC于2000年通过了一项创建10b5-1计划的规则。前SEC专员约瑟夫·格伦德菲斯特(Joseph Grundfest)在2013年表示,该机构的官员意识到了该结构的弱点,但该机构尚未完善该规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒周一表示,现在应该改变规则了。“在我看来,这些计划导致了我们内幕交易制度的真正裂痕,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,根据现行规则,监管机构将“确保我们识别并惩罚滥用10b5-1计划的行为”。</blockquote></p><p>A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”</p><p><blockquote>斯坦福大学、宾夕法尼亚大学和华盛顿大学的一组研究人员今年报告称,一些高管利用该计划进行“机会主义、大规模出售公司股票”。</blockquote></p><p>One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.</p><p><blockquote>研究人员表示,一个危险信号是:一些内部人士为计划制定后60天内发生的单笔交易制定了计划。这些交易平均使高管们避免了4%的损失,损失定义为该股在首次出售后六个月内相对于行业同行的表现。</blockquote></p><p>“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”</p><p><blockquote>Morrison&Foerster LLP合伙人、SEC旧金山办事处前负责人Jina Choi表示:“SEC正在关注此事,这一事实是明智且及时的。”“似乎确实存在一些差距,尤其是当你查看学术研究时。”</blockquote></p><p>The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.</p><p><blockquote>Ms.SEC对与10b5-1计划相关的交易采取的执法行动相对较少。崔去年在一份客户报告中写道。SEC的最后一个案件是在2012年1月提起的。</blockquote></p><p>In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.</p><p><blockquote>在一起此类案件中,SEC于2009年指控Countrywide Financial Corp.前首席执行官Angelo Mozilo进行与其制定的10b5-1计划相关的内幕交易。Mozilo在2010年解决了索赔,没有承认或否认不当行为。</blockquote></p><p>An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会的一项提案可能试图通过要求内部人士在计划构思后等待四到六个月再进行交易来降低不当交易的风险;限制计划的取消或修改;披露其采用情况和任何变更;并限制高管可以制定的计划数量。</blockquote></p><p>“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”</p><p><blockquote>“当内部人士确实掌握重要的非公开信息时,他们可以取消计划,”詹斯勒先生说。“对我来说,这似乎有点颠倒。这也可能削弱投资者的信心。”</blockquote></p><p>The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.</p><p><blockquote>机构投资者委员会在2012年和2013年要求SEC控制10b5-1计划,称这些计划容易被滥用。当时,美国证券交易委员会没有修改允许这些计划的规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还谈到了上市公司会计监督委员会的变化,该委员会是一个监督上市公司审计师的机构。SEC上周解雇了PCAOB主席威廉·杜恩克(William Duhnke),他是2017年任命的共和党人。SEC的两名共和党委员批评了此举。</blockquote></p><p>The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒表示,PCAOB没有履行其作为审计标准制定者和执行者的角色和使命。“我支持采取新的方向并重振这个重要的组织,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还表示,美国证券交易委员会正在为特殊目的收购公司起草新的规则或指导方针,这种交易结构在过去一年中作为传统首次公开募股的替代方案而蓬勃发展。Gensler质疑今年筹集了超过1000亿美元的SPAC是否对小投资者有利,因为他们可能不了解其复杂的结构和利益冲突。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>民主党任命的詹斯勒先生于四月份接管了SEC的控制权。在奥巴马政府期间,他是SEC的姐妹机构商品期货交易委员会的主席。在不受监管的交易引发了2008年金融危机后,他在CFTC实施了旨在降低掉期市场风险和提高透明度的规则。</blockquote></p><p>The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒领导下的CFTC将大多数标准化掉期交易推到交易所,并要求它们由清算所担保。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/secs-gary-gensler-speaks-at-wsj-event-11623070099?mod=hp_lista_pos3\">wsj</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/secs-gary-gensler-speaks-at-wsj-event-11623070099?mod=hp_lista_pos3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128603485","content_text":"The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":594,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":112856992,"gmtCreate":1622862088916,"gmtModify":1631888945945,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3582537029352499","idStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok ba","listText":"Ok ba","text":"Ok ba","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/112856992","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":180228850,"gmtCreate":1623207342270,"gmtModify":1631888945938,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Help comment and like thanks","listText":"Help comment and like thanks","text":"Help comment and like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/180228850","repostId":"1128909306","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128909306","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623193560,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1128909306?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-09 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128909306","media":"reuters","summary":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of c","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.</p><p><blockquote>纽约(路透社)-华尔街股市周二难以勉强维持收盘涨幅,因为缺乏明确的市场催化剂使机构投资者保持观望,而散户交易者则推动了模因股的持续上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.</p><p><blockquote>美国三大股指均在接近持平或走高的区间震荡时段结束,标普500和道指收盘距离纪录高位约0.5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数表现最佳,其中亚马逊公司和苹果公司的推动作用最大。</blockquote></p><p>“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥Kingsview资产管理公司的投资组合经理Paul Nolte表示:“我们正在等待通胀数据,等待(美联储)的更多数据,等待财报季。”“今天市场没有太多动力。”</blockquote></p><p>“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特补充道:“我们可能会在7月4日之后才会看到财报季开始。”</blockquote></p><p>The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.</p><p><blockquote>衡量投资者焦虑程度的芝加哥期权交易所波动率指数触及一年多来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.</p><p><blockquote>小型股再次受到持续的模因股票零售狂潮的提振,表现优于大型股。</blockquote></p><p>Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>Clover Health Investments在meme股票中占据榜首,飙升85.8%,成为纳斯达克涨幅最大的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.</p><p><blockquote>其他近期交易量爆炸性的股票,包括游戏驿站公司、Bed Bath&Beyond Inc、Workhorse Group等,收盘上涨7%至12%。</blockquote></p><p>“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特说:“(模因股票)是行动所在,但你把它翻过来,看起来像加密货币,那就一团糟了。”“现在,模因股票正在取代加密货币成为热门,这都是非常宽松的货币政策的结果。”</blockquote></p><p>Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部和全国独立企业联合会的报告似乎证实了劳动力短缺,尽管需求复苏,这可能会给工资带来上行压力,这是更广泛通胀的前兆。</blockquote></p><p>Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者从周四的消费者价格指数数据中寻找有关通胀的进一步线索,以及通胀如何影响美联储收紧货币政策的时间表。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数跌30.42点,或0.09%,报34,599.82点;标普500上涨0.74点,涨幅0.02%,至4,227.26点;纳斯达克综合指数上涨43.19点,涨幅0.31%,至13,924.91点。</blockquote></p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11个主要板块中,非必需消费品涨幅最大,公用事业跌幅最大。</blockquote></p><p>Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>根据中国乘用车协会的数据,特斯拉公司5月份中国制造的电动汽车销量猛增29%,同比增长177%。受此消息影响,该股抹去了最初的涨幅,收盘下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.</p><p><blockquote>西南航空宣布订购34架新737 MAX飞机,提振了波音公司股价,但该飞机制造商股价回吐涨幅,收盘持平。</blockquote></p><p>GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站是与Reddit驱动的轧空现象关系最密切的公司,预计将在周三收盘后公布季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.74比1;在纳斯达克,1.66比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下54个52周新高和1个新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得172个新高和16个新低。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为118.2亿股,而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为107.5亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 closes little changed as \"meme stocks\" extend rally<blockquote>随着“模因股”延续涨势,标普500收盘变化不大</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-09 07:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.</p><p><blockquote>纽约(路透社)-华尔街股市周二难以勉强维持收盘涨幅,因为缺乏明确的市场催化剂使机构投资者保持观望,而散户交易者则推动了模因股的持续上涨。</blockquote></p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.</p><p><blockquote>美国三大股指均在接近持平或走高的区间震荡时段结束,标普500和道指收盘距离纪录高位约0.5%。</blockquote></p><p>The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.</p><p><blockquote>以科技股为主的纳斯达克综合指数表现最佳,其中亚马逊公司和苹果公司的推动作用最大。</blockquote></p><p>“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥Kingsview资产管理公司的投资组合经理Paul Nolte表示:“我们正在等待通胀数据,等待(美联储)的更多数据,等待财报季。”“今天市场没有太多动力。”</blockquote></p><p>“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特补充道:“我们可能会在7月4日之后才会看到财报季开始。”</blockquote></p><p>The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.</p><p><blockquote>衡量投资者焦虑程度的芝加哥期权交易所波动率指数触及一年多来的最低水平。</blockquote></p><p>Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.</p><p><blockquote>小型股再次受到持续的模因股票零售狂潮的提振,表现优于大型股。</blockquote></p><p>Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.</p><p><blockquote>Clover Health Investments在meme股票中占据榜首,飙升85.8%,成为纳斯达克涨幅最大的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.</p><p><blockquote>其他近期交易量爆炸性的股票,包括游戏驿站公司、Bed Bath&Beyond Inc、Workhorse Group等,收盘上涨7%至12%。</blockquote></p><p>“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”</p><p><blockquote>诺尔特说:“(模因股票)是行动所在,但你把它翻过来,看起来像加密货币,那就一团糟了。”“现在,模因股票正在取代加密货币成为热门,这都是非常宽松的货币政策的结果。”</blockquote></p><p>Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部和全国独立企业联合会的报告似乎证实了劳动力短缺,尽管需求复苏,这可能会给工资带来上行压力,这是更广泛通胀的前兆。</blockquote></p><p>Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.</p><p><blockquote>市场参与者从周四的消费者价格指数数据中寻找有关通胀的进一步线索,以及通胀如何影响美联储收紧货币政策的时间表。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数跌30.42点,或0.09%,报34,599.82点;标普500上涨0.74点,涨幅0.02%,至4,227.26点;纳斯达克综合指数上涨43.19点,涨幅0.31%,至13,924.91点。</blockquote></p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.</p><p><blockquote>标普500 11个主要板块中,非必需消费品涨幅最大,公用事业跌幅最大。</blockquote></p><p>Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.</p><p><blockquote>根据中国乘用车协会的数据,特斯拉公司5月份中国制造的电动汽车销量猛增29%,同比增长177%。受此消息影响,该股抹去了最初的涨幅,收盘下跌0.3%。</blockquote></p><p>Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.</p><p><blockquote>西南航空宣布订购34架新737 MAX飞机,提振了波音公司股价,但该飞机制造商股价回吐涨幅,收盘持平。</blockquote></p><p>GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站是与Reddit驱动的轧空现象关系最密切的公司,预计将在周三收盘后公布季度业绩。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为1.74比1;在纳斯达克,1.66比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下54个52周新高和1个新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得172个新高和16个新低。</blockquote></p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所成交量为118.2亿股,而过去20个交易日的平均成交量为107.5亿股。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-closes-little-changed-as-meme-stocks-extend-rally-idUSL2N2NQ2NX\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-sp-500-closes-little-changed-as-meme-stocks-extend-rally-idUSL2N2NQ2NX","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128909306","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street stocks struggled to eke out closing gains on Tuesday as a lack of clear market catalysts kept institutional investors on the sidelines, while retail traders fueled the ongoing meme stocks rally.All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the range-bound session near flat or higher, with the S&P 500 and the Dow closing within about 0.5% of record highs.The tech-laded Nasdaq Composite fared best, with Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc providing the biggest boost.“We’re waiting for inflation numbers, waiting for more from the (Federal Reserve), waiting for earnings season,” said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. “There’s not a lot motivating the market today.”“We’re in this twilight zone until probably right after the Fourth of July, when we see earnings season kick in,” Nolte added.The CBOE volatility index, a measure of investor anxiety, touched its lowest level in over a year.Smallcaps, once again buoyed by the ongoing meme stock retail frenzy, were outperforming their larger counterparts.Clover Health Investments seized top billing among meme stocks, surging 85.8%, the biggest percentage winner in the Nasdaq.Other stocks whose recent explosive trading volumes have been attributed to social media buzz, including GameStop Corp, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc, Workhorse Group and others, ended the session between 7% and 12% higher.“(Meme stocks) are where the action is, but you flip it over and look crypto and that’s a mess,” Nolte said. “Now the meme stocks are taking over from crypto as the place to be and it’s all a consequence of very easy monetary policy.”Reports from the U.S. Labor Department and National Federation of Independent Business appeared to confirm a labor shortage even as demand roars back to life, which could put upward pressure on wages, a precursor to wider inflation.Market participants look to Thursday’s consumer price index data for further clues regarding inflation, and how it could influence the Federal Reserve’s timetable for tightening its monetary policy.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 30.42 points, or 0.09%, to 34,599.82; the S&P 500 gained 0.74 points, or 0.02%, at 4,227.26; and the Nasdaq Composite added 43.19 points, or 0.31%, at 13,924.91.Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, consumer discretionary enjoyed the biggest percentage gain, and utilities suffered the largest loss.Sales of Tesla Inc’s China-made electric cars jumped in May by 29%, marking a 177% year-on-year increase, according to the China Passenger Car Association. The stock erased initial gains on the news to close down 0.3%.Boeing Co shares were boosted by Southwest Airlines’ announcement that it had ordered 34 new 737 MAX aircraft, but the planemaker’s shares pared gains to end the session flat.GameStop, the company most closely associated with the Reddit-driven short squeeze phenomenon, is expected to report quarterly results after markets close on Wednesday.Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 1.74-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 54 new 52-week highs and one new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 172 new highs and 16 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.82 billion shares, compared with the 10.75 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"CLOV":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161176242,"gmtCreate":1623914541786,"gmtModify":1631888945915,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Line and comment thanks ","listText":"Line and comment thanks ","text":"Line and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/161176242","repostId":"2143379379","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":565,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":183173914,"gmtCreate":1623317769538,"gmtModify":1631888945934,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thx","listText":"Comment n like thx","text":"Comment n like thx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/183173914","repostId":"1111571294","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":691,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893390398,"gmtCreate":1628235961314,"gmtModify":1631884872590,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thanks ","listText":"Comment n like thanks ","text":"Comment n like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/893390398","repostId":"1110795702","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1886,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":181123333,"gmtCreate":1623379506022,"gmtModify":1631888945931,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thx","listText":"Comment n like thx","text":"Comment n like thx","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/181123333","repostId":"1184070773","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":431,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117896674,"gmtCreate":1623127724298,"gmtModify":1631888945944,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like pls","listText":"Comment n like pls","text":"Comment n like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/117896674","repostId":"1128603485","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128603485","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623122180,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1128603485?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-08 11:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128603485","media":"wsj","summary":"The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corpora","content":"<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在起草一项提案,该提案将限制公司内部人士在买卖自己公司股票时为避免内幕交易索赔而使用的计划。</blockquote></p><p>Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.</p><p><blockquote>SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)周一在《华尔街日报》首席财务官网络活动上发表讲话时表示,他正在寻求修改管理这些安排的规则,即10b5-1计划。内部人士提前制定计划,并用它们来安排未来的交易。该安排为高管提供了针对因交易时拥有未披露的重大非公开信息而引发的内幕交易索赔的辩护。</blockquote></p><p>The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.</p><p><blockquote>这些计划经常会引起争议,因为在内部人士制定计划时,不需要公开披露计划。一些投资者表示,计划可以被操纵,因为例如,高管可以修改或取消它们。上市公司有时会披露计划,以减轻高管利用非公开信息进行交易的看法。</blockquote></p><p>The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.</p><p><blockquote>SEC于2000年通过了一项创建10b5-1计划的规则。前SEC专员约瑟夫·格伦德菲斯特(Joseph Grundfest)在2013年表示,该机构的官员意识到了该结构的弱点,但该机构尚未完善该规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒周一表示,现在应该改变规则了。“在我看来,这些计划导致了我们内幕交易制度的真正裂痕,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,根据现行规则,监管机构将“确保我们识别并惩罚滥用10b5-1计划的行为”。</blockquote></p><p>A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”</p><p><blockquote>斯坦福大学、宾夕法尼亚大学和华盛顿大学的一组研究人员今年报告称,一些高管利用该计划进行“机会主义、大规模出售公司股票”。</blockquote></p><p>One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.</p><p><blockquote>研究人员表示,一个危险信号是:一些内部人士为计划制定后60天内发生的单笔交易制定了计划。这些交易平均使高管们避免了4%的损失,损失定义为该股在首次出售后六个月内相对于行业同行的表现。</blockquote></p><p>“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”</p><p><blockquote>Morrison&Foerster LLP合伙人、SEC旧金山办事处前负责人Jina Choi表示:“SEC正在关注此事,这一事实是明智且及时的。”“似乎确实存在一些差距,尤其是当你查看学术研究时。”</blockquote></p><p>The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.</p><p><blockquote>Ms.SEC对与10b5-1计划相关的交易采取的执法行动相对较少。崔去年在一份客户报告中写道。SEC的最后一个案件是在2012年1月提起的。</blockquote></p><p>In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.</p><p><blockquote>在一起此类案件中,SEC于2009年指控Countrywide Financial Corp.前首席执行官Angelo Mozilo进行与其制定的10b5-1计划相关的内幕交易。Mozilo在2010年解决了索赔,没有承认或否认不当行为。</blockquote></p><p>An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会的一项提案可能试图通过要求内部人士在计划构思后等待四到六个月再进行交易来降低不当交易的风险;限制计划的取消或修改;披露其采用情况和任何变更;并限制高管可以制定的计划数量。</blockquote></p><p>“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”</p><p><blockquote>“当内部人士确实掌握重要的非公开信息时,他们可以取消计划,”詹斯勒先生说。“对我来说,这似乎有点颠倒。这也可能削弱投资者的信心。”</blockquote></p><p>The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.</p><p><blockquote>机构投资者委员会在2012年和2013年要求SEC控制10b5-1计划,称这些计划容易被滥用。当时,美国证券交易委员会没有修改允许这些计划的规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还谈到了上市公司会计监督委员会的变化,该委员会是一个监督上市公司审计师的机构。SEC上周解雇了PCAOB主席威廉·杜恩克(William Duhnke),他是2017年任命的共和党人。SEC的两名共和党委员批评了此举。</blockquote></p><p>The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒表示,PCAOB没有履行其作为审计标准制定者和执行者的角色和使命。“我支持采取新的方向并重振这个重要的组织,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还表示,美国证券交易委员会正在为特殊目的收购公司起草新的规则或指导方针,这种交易结构在过去一年中作为传统首次公开募股的替代方案而蓬勃发展。Gensler质疑今年筹集了超过1000亿美元的SPAC是否对小投资者有利,因为他们可能不了解其复杂的结构和利益冲突。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>民主党任命的詹斯勒先生于四月份接管了SEC的控制权。在奥巴马政府期间,他是SEC的姐妹机构商品期货交易委员会的主席。在不受监管的交易引发了2008年金融危机后,他在CFTC实施了旨在降低掉期市场风险和提高透明度的规则。</blockquote></p><p>The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒领导下的CFTC将大多数标准化掉期交易推到交易所,并要求它们由清算所担保。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSEC Chairman Calls for New Restrictions on Executive Stock-Trading Plans<blockquote>美国证券交易委员会主席评级呼吁对高管股票交易计划实施新限制</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">wsj</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-08 11:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会正在起草一项提案,该提案将限制公司内部人士在买卖自己公司股票时为避免内幕交易索赔而使用的计划。</blockquote></p><p>Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.</p><p><blockquote>SEC主席加里·詹斯勒(Gary Gensler)周一在《华尔街日报》首席财务官网络活动上发表讲话时表示,他正在寻求修改管理这些安排的规则,即10b5-1计划。内部人士提前制定计划,并用它们来安排未来的交易。该安排为高管提供了针对因交易时拥有未披露的重大非公开信息而引发的内幕交易索赔的辩护。</blockquote></p><p>The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.</p><p><blockquote>这些计划经常会引起争议,因为在内部人士制定计划时,不需要公开披露计划。一些投资者表示,计划可以被操纵,因为例如,高管可以修改或取消它们。上市公司有时会披露计划,以减轻高管利用非公开信息进行交易的看法。</blockquote></p><p>The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.</p><p><blockquote>SEC于2000年通过了一项创建10b5-1计划的规则。前SEC专员约瑟夫·格伦德菲斯特(Joseph Grundfest)在2013年表示,该机构的官员意识到了该结构的弱点,但该机构尚未完善该规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒周一表示,现在应该改变规则了。“在我看来,这些计划导致了我们内幕交易制度的真正裂痕,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,根据现行规则,监管机构将“确保我们识别并惩罚滥用10b5-1计划的行为”。</blockquote></p><p>A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”</p><p><blockquote>斯坦福大学、宾夕法尼亚大学和华盛顿大学的一组研究人员今年报告称,一些高管利用该计划进行“机会主义、大规模出售公司股票”。</blockquote></p><p>One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.</p><p><blockquote>研究人员表示,一个危险信号是:一些内部人士为计划制定后60天内发生的单笔交易制定了计划。这些交易平均使高管们避免了4%的损失,损失定义为该股在首次出售后六个月内相对于行业同行的表现。</blockquote></p><p>“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”</p><p><blockquote>Morrison&Foerster LLP合伙人、SEC旧金山办事处前负责人Jina Choi表示:“SEC正在关注此事,这一事实是明智且及时的。”“似乎确实存在一些差距,尤其是当你查看学术研究时。”</blockquote></p><p>The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.</p><p><blockquote>Ms.SEC对与10b5-1计划相关的交易采取的执法行动相对较少。崔去年在一份客户报告中写道。SEC的最后一个案件是在2012年1月提起的。</blockquote></p><p>In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.</p><p><blockquote>在一起此类案件中,SEC于2009年指控Countrywide Financial Corp.前首席执行官Angelo Mozilo进行与其制定的10b5-1计划相关的内幕交易。Mozilo在2010年解决了索赔,没有承认或否认不当行为。</blockquote></p><p>An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.</p><p><blockquote>美国证券交易委员会的一项提案可能试图通过要求内部人士在计划构思后等待四到六个月再进行交易来降低不当交易的风险;限制计划的取消或修改;披露其采用情况和任何变更;并限制高管可以制定的计划数量。</blockquote></p><p>“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”</p><p><blockquote>“当内部人士确实掌握重要的非公开信息时,他们可以取消计划,”詹斯勒先生说。“对我来说,这似乎有点颠倒。这也可能削弱投资者的信心。”</blockquote></p><p>The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.</p><p><blockquote>机构投资者委员会在2012年和2013年要求SEC控制10b5-1计划,称这些计划容易被滥用。当时,美国证券交易委员会没有修改允许这些计划的规则。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还谈到了上市公司会计监督委员会的变化,该委员会是一个监督上市公司审计师的机构。SEC上周解雇了PCAOB主席威廉·杜恩克(William Duhnke),他是2017年任命的共和党人。SEC的两名共和党委员批评了此举。</blockquote></p><p>The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒表示,PCAOB没有履行其作为审计标准制定者和执行者的角色和使命。“我支持采取新的方向并重振这个重要的组织,”他说。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒先生还表示,美国证券交易委员会正在为特殊目的收购公司起草新的规则或指导方针,这种交易结构在过去一年中作为传统首次公开募股的替代方案而蓬勃发展。Gensler质疑今年筹集了超过1000亿美元的SPAC是否对小投资者有利,因为他们可能不了解其复杂的结构和利益冲突。</blockquote></p><p>Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.</p><p><blockquote>民主党任命的詹斯勒先生于四月份接管了SEC的控制权。在奥巴马政府期间,他是SEC的姐妹机构商品期货交易委员会的主席。在不受监管的交易引发了2008年金融危机后,他在CFTC实施了旨在降低掉期市场风险和提高透明度的规则。</blockquote></p><p>The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.</p><p><blockquote>詹斯勒领导下的CFTC将大多数标准化掉期交易推到交易所,并要求它们由清算所担保。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/secs-gary-gensler-speaks-at-wsj-event-11623070099?mod=hp_lista_pos3\">wsj</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/secs-gary-gensler-speaks-at-wsj-event-11623070099?mod=hp_lista_pos3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128603485","content_text":"The Securities and Exchange Commission is drafting a proposal that would restrict plans that corporate insiders use to avoid insider-trading claims when buying or selling their own company’s stock.Speaking Monday atThe Wall Street Journal’s CFO Network event, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said he is seeking to revise rules that govern the arrangements, known as 10b5-1 plans. Insiders set up plans ahead of time and use them to schedule future trades. The arrangement gives executives a defense against insider-trading claims that would stem from having undisclosed material nonpublic information at the time of a trade.The plans often generate controversy because there is no required public disclosure of a plan at the time an insider sets one up. Some investors say plans can be manipulated because, for instance, executives can modify or cancel them. Public companies sometimes disclose the plans to mitigate the perception that executives are trading on nonpublic information.The SEC passed a rule creating 10b5-1 plans in 2000. The agency’s officialswere aware of weaknesses in the structure, former SEC Commissioner Joseph Grundfest said in 2013, but the agency hasn’t refined the rule.Mr. Gensler suggested Monday that rule changes are now due. “In my view, these plans have led to real cracks in our insider-trading regime,” he said.He added that regulators would “ensure we are identifying and punishing abuses of 10b5-1 plans” under the current rule.A group of researchers at Stanford University, the University of Pennsylvania and the University Washingtonreported this yearthat some executives use the plans to conduct “opportunistic, large-scale selling of company shares.”One red flag, according to the researchers: Some insiders set up plans for a single trade that occurred within 60 days of the plan’s creation. Those trades, on average, allowed the executives to avoid losses of 4%, defined as the stock’s performance relative to industry peers during the six months following the first sale.“The fact that the SEC is looking at this is smart and timely,” said Jina Choi, a partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP and former head of the SEC’s San Francisco office. “There do seem to be some gaps, especially when you look at the academic studies.”The SEC has brought relatively few enforcement actions over trading linked to a 10b5-1 plan,Ms. Choi wrote in a client notelast year. The last SEC case was brought in January 2012.In one such case, the SEC in 2009 accused former Countrywide Financial Corp. Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo of insider trading related to 10b5-1 plans he had set up.Mr. Mozilo settled the claimsin 2010 without admitting or denying wrongdoing.An SEC proposal could try to reduce the risk of improper trading by requiring insiders to wait four to six months after a plan’s conception before trading; putting limits on plan cancellations or modifications; disclosing their adoption and any changes; and curbing the number of plans that executives can set up.“Insiders can cancel a plan when they actually do have material nonpublic information,” Mr. Gensler said. “This seems kind of upside-down to me. It also may undermine investor confidence.”The Council of Institutional Investors asked the SEC in 2012 and 2013 to rein in 10b5-1 plans, saying they were subject to abuse. At the time, the SEC didn’t revise the rule that permits the plans.Mr. Gensler also addressed changes at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a body that oversees public-company auditors.The SEC last week fired the PCAOB’s chairman, William Duhnke, a Republican appointed in 2017. The SEC’s two Republican commissioners criticized the move.The PCAOB wasn’t living up to its role and mission as a setter and enforcer of auditing standards, Mr. Gensler said. “I supported taking a new direction and reinvigorating this important organization,” he said.Mr. Gensler has also signaled the SEC is drafting new rules or guidelines for special-purpose acquisition companies, a deal-making structure that flourished during the past year as an alternative to the traditional initial public offering.Mr. Gensler has questioned whether SPACs, which raised more than $100 billion this year, are good for small investors, who may not understand their complex structure and conflicts of interest.Mr. Gensler, a Democratic appointee, took over control of the SEC in April. He was chairman of the SEC’s sister agency, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, during the Obama administration. At the CFTC, he implemented rules intended to reduce risk and increase transparency in the swaps market, after unregulated trading helped inflame the 2008 financial crisis.The CFTC under Mr. Gensler pushed most standardized swaps trades onto exchanges and required them to be guaranteed by clearinghouses.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":594,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":139625620,"gmtCreate":1621617357860,"gmtModify":1631891125518,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Commebt","listText":"Commebt","text":"Commebt","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/139625620","repostId":"2137900282","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":369,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186854260,"gmtCreate":1623486957250,"gmtModify":1631888945929,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like, thanks ","listText":"Comment n like, thanks ","text":"Comment n like, thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186854260","repostId":"2142204074","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127245233,"gmtCreate":1624853572422,"gmtModify":1631884872664,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/127245233","repostId":"1161283536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161283536","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624850034,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161283536?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-28 11:13","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"The Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161283536","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered ","content":"<p>Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.</p><p><blockquote>香港股市将于周一下午恢复交易,此前该市气象台降低了早些时候导致上午交易取消的暴雨警告。</blockquote></p><p> The Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.</p><p><blockquote>当地时间上午11点过后不久,香港天文台将暴雨警告从黑色下调至红色,这意味着股票交易将于下午1点30分开始。根据香港交易及结算所有限公司的规则。由于黑雨警告,该交易所运营商早些时候取消了证券和衍生品市场的早盘交易,包括沪港通。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.</p><p><blockquote>早些时候,由于恶劣的天气条件,该市教育局暂停了全港的课程。政府将在降低暴雨警告后恢复接种疫苗。</blockquote></p><p> Morning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>该市上次取消早盘交易是在去年10月,当时热带风暴南卡促使当局关闭企业和学校。根据彭博社汇编的数据,今年香港的日均营业额约为1,880亿港元(合242亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p> When the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”</p><p><blockquote>大华继显(香港)有限公司执行董事Steven Leung表示,当市场下午重新开市时,“仍有充足的时间消化周末消息和A股走势。”“最近香港和A股的市场都相对稳定。”</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Hong Kong Stock Exchange will resume trading at 1:30 p.m., as the rainstorm signal changes.<blockquote>港交所将于下午1时30分恢复交易,因暴雨信号改变。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-28 11:13</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.</p><p><blockquote>香港股市将于周一下午恢复交易,此前该市气象台降低了早些时候导致上午交易取消的暴雨警告。</blockquote></p><p> The Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.</p><p><blockquote>当地时间上午11点过后不久,香港天文台将暴雨警告从黑色下调至红色,这意味着股票交易将于下午1点30分开始。根据香港交易及结算所有限公司的规则。由于黑雨警告,该交易所运营商早些时候取消了证券和衍生品市场的早盘交易,包括沪港通。</blockquote></p><p> Earlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.</p><p><blockquote>早些时候,由于恶劣的天气条件,该市教育局暂停了全港的课程。政府将在降低暴雨警告后恢复接种疫苗。</blockquote></p><p> Morning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.</p><p><blockquote>该市上次取消早盘交易是在去年10月,当时热带风暴南卡促使当局关闭企业和学校。根据彭博社汇编的数据,今年香港的日均营业额约为1,880亿港元(合242亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p> When the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”</p><p><blockquote>大华继显(香港)有限公司执行董事Steven Leung表示,当市场下午重新开市时,“仍有充足的时间消化周末消息和A股走势。”“最近香港和A股的市场都相对稳定。”</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161283536","content_text":"Hong Kong stocks will resume trading Monday afternoon, after the city’s weather observatory lowered its rainstorm warning that had earlier prompted the cancellation of the morning session.\nThe Hong Kong Observatory lowered the rainstorm warning to red from black shortly after 11 a.m. local time, meaning stock trading will begin at 1:30 p.m. in accordance with Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd.’s rules. The bourse operator had earlier canceled morning trading of bothsecuritiesand derivatives markets, including Stock Connect due to the black rain warning.\nEarlier the city’s education bureau suspended classes across Hong Kong due to the severe weather conditions. The government will resume vaccination after lowering the rainstorm warning.\nMorning trading in the city was lastcanceledin October last year, when tropical storm Nangka prompted authorities to shutter businesses and close schools. Average dailyturnoverin Hong Kong this year stands at around HK$188 billion ($24.2 billion), according to data compiled by Bloomberg.\nWhen the market reopens in the afternoon, “there will still be plenty of time to digest weekend news and A-share movements,” said Steven Leung, executive director of UoB Kay Hian (Hong Kong) Ltd. “Markets have been relatively stable in both Hong Kong and A shares lately.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3050,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":113811241,"gmtCreate":1622602530983,"gmtModify":1631888945947,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls comment n like","listText":"Pls comment n like","text":"Pls comment n like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/113811241","repostId":"1106176005","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106176005","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622588821,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1106176005?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-02 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 dips, as healthcare weighs; Dow ends higher<blockquote>随着医疗保健的压力,标普500下跌;道指收高</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106176005","media":"Reuters","summary":"The S&P 500dipped on Tuesday, with declines in healthcare and tech shares countered by energy and financial gains, as investors weighed the latest U.S. economic data for signs of a rebound and rising inflation.The S&P 500 financial sectorhit a record high, while expected growth in fuel demand boosted oil prices and helped lift the energy sector3.9%, its biggest $one$-day gain in nearly four months. The heavyweight tech sectorfell while the healthcare sectorwas dragged down by a weak profit forec","content":"<p>The S&P 500(.SPX)dipped on Tuesday, with declines in healthcare and tech shares countered by energy and financial gains, as investors weighed the latest U.S. economic data for signs of a rebound and rising inflation.</p><p><blockquote>标普500(.SPX)周二下跌,医疗保健和科技股的下跌被能源和金融股的上涨所抵消,投资者权衡最新的美国经济数据是否有反弹和通胀上升的迹象。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 financial sector(.SPSY)hit a record high, while expected growth in fuel demand boosted oil prices and helped lift the energy sector(.SPNY)3.9%, its biggest <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-day gain in nearly four months. The heavyweight tech sector(.SPLRCT)fell while the healthcare sector(.SPXHC)was dragged down by a weak profit forecast from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABT\">Abbott Laboratories</a>(ABT.N).</p><p><blockquote>标普500金融板块(.SPSY)创历史新高,而燃料需求预期增长提振油价,并帮助提振能源板块(.SPNY)上涨3.9%,为最大<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">一</a>-近四个月来的日涨幅。重量级科技板块(.SPLRCT)下跌,而医疗保健板块(.SPXHC)则受到来自<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABT\">雅培实验室</a>(N部)。</blockquote></p><p>Data showed U.S.manufacturing activity pickedup in May as pent-up demand in a reopening economy boosted orders. But unfinished work piled up because of shortages of raw materials and labor.</p><p><blockquote>数据显示,由于经济重新开放中被压抑的需求提振了订单,美国5月份制造业活动有所回升。但由于原材料和劳动力短缺,未完成的工作堆积起来。</blockquote></p><p>\"People came back from a holiday weekend convinced that the economy is recovering nicely and that any inflation that we might be seeing in labor and other costs is temporary,\" Peter Tuz, president of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCF\">Chase</a> Investment Counsel in Charlottesville, Virginia.</p><p><blockquote>“人们从假期周末回来后确信经济正在良好复苏,我们可能在劳动力和其他成本方面看到的任何通胀都是暂时的,”<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCF\">追逐</a>弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔的投资顾问。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 45.86 points, or 0.13%, to 34,575.31; the S&P 500(.SPX)lost 2.07 points, or 0.05%, at 4,202.04; and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)dropped 12.26 points, or 0.09%, to 13,736.48.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数(.DJI)涨45.86点,或0.13%,报34,575.31;标普500(.SPX)下跌2.07点,或0.05%,报4,202.04点;和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>综合指数(.IXIC)下跌12.26点,或0.09%,至13,736.48点。</blockquote></p><p>Along with sharp gains for financials and energy, the small-cap Russell 2000(.RUT)rose 1.1% on Tuesday, underscoring strength for segments of the stock market expected to do particularly well in an expanding economy.</p><p><blockquote>随着金融和能源股的大幅上涨,小盘股罗素2000指数(.RUT)周二上涨1.1%,突显了预计在经济扩张中表现尤其出色的股市板块的强势。</blockquote></p><p>While the S&P 500 remains less than 1% of its record high after four straight months of gains, investors are worried about whether rising inflation could hit equity prices.</p><p><blockquote>尽管标普500在连续四个月上涨后仍不到历史高点的1%,但投资者担心通胀上升是否会打击股价。</blockquote></p><p>\"We have supply chain issues, delays, price increases, pricing pressures in general, we have got employers saying they have got difficulty sourcing labor,\" said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p><p><blockquote>首席全球市场策略师克里斯蒂娜·胡珀(Kristina Hooper)表示:“我们面临供应链问题、延误、价格上涨、总体定价压力,雇主表示他们很难找到劳动力。”<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">景顺</a>在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>.</blockquote></p><p>\"So this is a microcosm of what we are already hearing about and seeing in the overall economy and it's just a reminder that inflation remains a concern.\"</p><p><blockquote>“因此,这是我们在整体经济中已经听到和看到的情况的一个缩影,它只是提醒人们通货膨胀仍然是一个问题。”</blockquote></p><p>A Wall St. sign is seen near the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYRT\">New York</a> Stock Exchange (NYSE) in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> York <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CHCO\">City</a>, U.S., May 4, 2021. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo</p><p><blockquote>附近可以看到华尔街的标志<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYRT\">纽约</a>纽约证券交易所<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">新的</a>约克<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CHCO\">城市</a>,美国,2021年5月4日。路透社/Brendan McDermid/资料照片</blockquote></p><p>Stock markets on Friday brushed off a surge inkey inflation readingsfor April following reassurances from Federal Reserve officials that the central bank’s ultra-loose monetary policy would remain in place.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储官员保证央行超宽松货币政策将继续实施后,周五股市没有出现四月份关键通胀数据的飙升。</blockquote></p><p>Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari and Fed Vice Chair for supervision Randal Quarles on Tuesday reiterated the view that higher prices would be transitory.</p><p><blockquote>明尼阿波利斯联邦储备银行行长尼尔·卡什卡利和美联储负责监管的副主席兰德尔·夸尔斯周二重申了价格上涨将是暂时的观点。</blockquote></p><p>This week's focus will be on a raft of economic data, culminating with U.S. payrolls due on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>本周的焦点将是大量经济数据,最终将于周五公布的美国就业数据。</blockquote></p><p>Abbott Labs shares fell 9.3% after the company cut itsfull-year 2021 profit forecast, citing expectations for a sharp decline in revenue from its COVID-19 tests as more Americans get vaccinated. Shares of other test makers also fell.</p><p><blockquote>雅培实验室(Abbott Labs)下调2021年全年利润预期,理由是随着越来越多的美国人接种疫苗,预计其COVID-19检测收入将大幅下降,该公司股价下跌9.3%。其他测试制造商的股价也下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Cloudera Inc(CLDR.N)shares jumped 23.9% after private equity firms KKR & Co(KKR.N)and Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLCagreed to take the data analytics firm private.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudera Inc(CLDR.N)在私募股权公司KKR&Co(KKR)之后,股价上涨23.9%。N)和Clayton Dubilier&Rice LLCA同意将这家数据分析公司私有化。</blockquote></p><p>A group of“meme stocks” extended gainsfrom the previous week, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC Entertainment</a> Holdings Inc(AMC.N)up 22.7% after the movie theater chain said it sold $230 million of its stock.</p><p><blockquote>一批“模因股”延续了前一周的涨幅,其中<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC院线</a>Holdings Inc(AMC.N)上涨22.7%,此前这家连锁电影院表示出售了价值2.3亿美元的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.54-to-1 ratio; on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a>, a 1.79-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为2.54比1;在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>1.79比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 73 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 168 new highs and 25 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下73个52周新高,无新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得168个新高和25个新低。</blockquote></p><p>About 10.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10.5 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所约有107亿股易手,而过去20个交易日的日均交易量为105亿股。</blockquote></p><p><b>Here are company's financial statements:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>以下是公司的财务报表:</b></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1184181912\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Zoom reports blowout earnings but warns of a coming slowdown</b></a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1184181912\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Zoom报告盈利井喷,但警告即将放缓</b></a></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 dips, as healthcare weighs; Dow ends higher<blockquote>随着医疗保健的压力,标普500下跌;道指收高</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 dips, as healthcare weighs; Dow ends higher<blockquote>随着医疗保健的压力,标普500下跌;道指收高</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-02 07:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The S&P 500(.SPX)dipped on Tuesday, with declines in healthcare and tech shares countered by energy and financial gains, as investors weighed the latest U.S. economic data for signs of a rebound and rising inflation.</p><p><blockquote>标普500(.SPX)周二下跌,医疗保健和科技股的下跌被能源和金融股的上涨所抵消,投资者权衡最新的美国经济数据是否有反弹和通胀上升的迹象。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 financial sector(.SPSY)hit a record high, while expected growth in fuel demand boosted oil prices and helped lift the energy sector(.SPNY)3.9%, its biggest <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-day gain in nearly four months. The heavyweight tech sector(.SPLRCT)fell while the healthcare sector(.SPXHC)was dragged down by a weak profit forecast from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABT\">Abbott Laboratories</a>(ABT.N).</p><p><blockquote>标普500金融板块(.SPSY)创历史新高,而燃料需求预期增长提振油价,并帮助提振能源板块(.SPNY)上涨3.9%,为最大<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">一</a>-近四个月来的日涨幅。重量级科技板块(.SPLRCT)下跌,而医疗保健板块(.SPXHC)则受到来自<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABT\">雅培实验室</a>(N部)。</blockquote></p><p>Data showed U.S.manufacturing activity pickedup in May as pent-up demand in a reopening economy boosted orders. But unfinished work piled up because of shortages of raw materials and labor.</p><p><blockquote>数据显示,由于经济重新开放中被压抑的需求提振了订单,美国5月份制造业活动有所回升。但由于原材料和劳动力短缺,未完成的工作堆积起来。</blockquote></p><p>\"People came back from a holiday weekend convinced that the economy is recovering nicely and that any inflation that we might be seeing in labor and other costs is temporary,\" Peter Tuz, president of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCF\">Chase</a> Investment Counsel in Charlottesville, Virginia.</p><p><blockquote>“人们从假期周末回来后确信经济正在良好复苏,我们可能在劳动力和其他成本方面看到的任何通胀都是暂时的,”<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CCF\">追逐</a>弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔的投资顾问。</blockquote></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 45.86 points, or 0.13%, to 34,575.31; the S&P 500(.SPX)lost 2.07 points, or 0.05%, at 4,202.04; and the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite(.IXIC)dropped 12.26 points, or 0.09%, to 13,736.48.</p><p><blockquote>道琼工业指数(.DJI)涨45.86点,或0.13%,报34,575.31;标普500(.SPX)下跌2.07点,或0.05%,报4,202.04点;和<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>综合指数(.IXIC)下跌12.26点,或0.09%,至13,736.48点。</blockquote></p><p>Along with sharp gains for financials and energy, the small-cap Russell 2000(.RUT)rose 1.1% on Tuesday, underscoring strength for segments of the stock market expected to do particularly well in an expanding economy.</p><p><blockquote>随着金融和能源股的大幅上涨,小盘股罗素2000指数(.RUT)周二上涨1.1%,突显了预计在经济扩张中表现尤其出色的股市板块的强势。</blockquote></p><p>While the S&P 500 remains less than 1% of its record high after four straight months of gains, investors are worried about whether rising inflation could hit equity prices.</p><p><blockquote>尽管标普500在连续四个月上涨后仍不到历史高点的1%,但投资者担心通胀上升是否会打击股价。</blockquote></p><p>\"We have supply chain issues, delays, price increases, pricing pressures in general, we have got employers saying they have got difficulty sourcing labor,\" said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">Invesco</a> in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">New York</a>.</p><p><blockquote>首席全球市场策略师克里斯蒂娜·胡珀(Kristina Hooper)表示:“我们面临供应链问题、延误、价格上涨、总体定价压力,雇主表示他们很难找到劳动力。”<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVZ\">景顺</a>在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWY\">纽约</a>.</blockquote></p><p>\"So this is a microcosm of what we are already hearing about and seeing in the overall economy and it's just a reminder that inflation remains a concern.\"</p><p><blockquote>“因此,这是我们在整体经济中已经听到和看到的情况的一个缩影,它只是提醒人们通货膨胀仍然是一个问题。”</blockquote></p><p>A Wall St. sign is seen near the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYRT\">New York</a> Stock Exchange (NYSE) in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> York <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CHCO\">City</a>, U.S., May 4, 2021. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo</p><p><blockquote>附近可以看到华尔街的标志<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYRT\">纽约</a>纽约证券交易所<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">新的</a>约克<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CHCO\">城市</a>,美国,2021年5月4日。路透社/Brendan McDermid/资料照片</blockquote></p><p>Stock markets on Friday brushed off a surge inkey inflation readingsfor April following reassurances from Federal Reserve officials that the central bank’s ultra-loose monetary policy would remain in place.</p><p><blockquote>在美联储官员保证央行超宽松货币政策将继续实施后,周五股市没有出现四月份关键通胀数据的飙升。</blockquote></p><p>Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari and Fed Vice Chair for supervision Randal Quarles on Tuesday reiterated the view that higher prices would be transitory.</p><p><blockquote>明尼阿波利斯联邦储备银行行长尼尔·卡什卡利和美联储负责监管的副主席兰德尔·夸尔斯周二重申了价格上涨将是暂时的观点。</blockquote></p><p>This week's focus will be on a raft of economic data, culminating with U.S. payrolls due on Friday.</p><p><blockquote>本周的焦点将是大量经济数据,最终将于周五公布的美国就业数据。</blockquote></p><p>Abbott Labs shares fell 9.3% after the company cut itsfull-year 2021 profit forecast, citing expectations for a sharp decline in revenue from its COVID-19 tests as more Americans get vaccinated. Shares of other test makers also fell.</p><p><blockquote>雅培实验室(Abbott Labs)下调2021年全年利润预期,理由是随着越来越多的美国人接种疫苗,预计其COVID-19检测收入将大幅下降,该公司股价下跌9.3%。其他测试制造商的股价也下跌。</blockquote></p><p>Cloudera Inc(CLDR.N)shares jumped 23.9% after private equity firms KKR & Co(KKR.N)and Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLCagreed to take the data analytics firm private.</p><p><blockquote>Cloudera Inc(CLDR.N)在私募股权公司KKR&Co(KKR)之后,股价上涨23.9%。N)和Clayton Dubilier&Rice LLCA同意将这家数据分析公司私有化。</blockquote></p><p>A group of“meme stocks” extended gainsfrom the previous week, with shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC Entertainment</a> Holdings Inc(AMC.N)up 22.7% after the movie theater chain said it sold $230 million of its stock.</p><p><blockquote>一批“模因股”延续了前一周的涨幅,其中<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC院线</a>Holdings Inc(AMC.N)上涨22.7%,此前这家连锁电影院表示出售了价值2.3亿美元的股票。</blockquote></p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.54-to-1 ratio; on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a>, a 1.79-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p><blockquote>纽约证券交易所上涨股与下跌股的比例为2.54比1;在<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">纳斯达克</a>1.79比1的比率有利于上涨者。</blockquote></p><p>The S&P 500 posted 73 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 168 new highs and 25 new lows.</p><p><blockquote>标普500创下73个52周新高,无新低;纳斯达克综合指数录得168个新高和25个新低。</blockquote></p><p>About 10.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10.5 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p><p><blockquote>美国交易所约有107亿股易手,而过去20个交易日的日均交易量为105亿股。</blockquote></p><p><b>Here are company's financial statements:</b></p><p><blockquote><b>以下是公司的财务报表:</b></blockquote></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1184181912\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Zoom reports blowout earnings but warns of a coming slowdown</b></a></p><p><blockquote><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1184181912\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Zoom报告盈利井喷,但警告即将放缓</b></a></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/business/sp-500-dips-healthcare-weighs-dow-ends-higher-2021-06-01/\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","SPY":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/business/sp-500-dips-healthcare-weighs-dow-ends-higher-2021-06-01/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106176005","content_text":"The S&P 500(.SPX)dipped on Tuesday, with declines in healthcare and tech shares countered by energy and financial gains, as investors weighed the latest U.S. economic data for signs of a rebound and rising inflation.The S&P 500 financial sector(.SPSY)hit a record high, while expected growth in fuel demand boosted oil prices and helped lift the energy sector(.SPNY)3.9%, its biggest one-day gain in nearly four months. The heavyweight tech sector(.SPLRCT)fell while the healthcare sector(.SPXHC)was dragged down by a weak profit forecast from Abbott Laboratories(ABT.N).Data showed U.S.manufacturing activity pickedup in May as pent-up demand in a reopening economy boosted orders. But unfinished work piled up because of shortages of raw materials and labor.\"People came back from a holiday weekend convinced that the economy is recovering nicely and that any inflation that we might be seeing in labor and other costs is temporary,\" Peter Tuz, president of Chase Investment Counsel in Charlottesville, Virginia.The Dow Jones Industrial Average(.DJI)rose 45.86 points, or 0.13%, to 34,575.31; the S&P 500(.SPX)lost 2.07 points, or 0.05%, at 4,202.04; and the Nasdaq Composite(.IXIC)dropped 12.26 points, or 0.09%, to 13,736.48.Along with sharp gains for financials and energy, the small-cap Russell 2000(.RUT)rose 1.1% on Tuesday, underscoring strength for segments of the stock market expected to do particularly well in an expanding economy.While the S&P 500 remains less than 1% of its record high after four straight months of gains, investors are worried about whether rising inflation could hit equity prices.\"We have supply chain issues, delays, price increases, pricing pressures in general, we have got employers saying they have got difficulty sourcing labor,\" said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco in New York.\"So this is a microcosm of what we are already hearing about and seeing in the overall economy and it's just a reminder that inflation remains a concern.\"A Wall St. sign is seen near the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., May 4, 2021. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File PhotoStock markets on Friday brushed off a surge inkey inflation readingsfor April following reassurances from Federal Reserve officials that the central bank’s ultra-loose monetary policy would remain in place.Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank President Neel Kashkari and Fed Vice Chair for supervision Randal Quarles on Tuesday reiterated the view that higher prices would be transitory.This week's focus will be on a raft of economic data, culminating with U.S. payrolls due on Friday.Abbott Labs shares fell 9.3% after the company cut itsfull-year 2021 profit forecast, citing expectations for a sharp decline in revenue from its COVID-19 tests as more Americans get vaccinated. Shares of other test makers also fell.Cloudera Inc(CLDR.N)shares jumped 23.9% after private equity firms KKR & Co(KKR.N)and Clayton Dubilier & Rice LLCagreed to take the data analytics firm private.A group of“meme stocks” extended gainsfrom the previous week, with shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc(AMC.N)up 22.7% after the movie theater chain said it sold $230 million of its stock.Advancing issues outnumbered decliners on the NYSE by a 2.54-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.79-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 73 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 168 new highs and 25 new lows.About 10.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10.5 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.Here are company's financial statements:Zoom reports blowout earnings but warns of a coming slowdown","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"513500":0.9,"SDS":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"OEX":0.9,"SSO":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SH":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,"OEF":0.9,"SPY":0.9,"SPXU":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":680,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179244293,"gmtCreate":1626540477212,"gmtModify":1631884872627,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179244293","repostId":"1198202103","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2775,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":166614637,"gmtCreate":1624005923629,"gmtModify":1631884872677,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/166614637","repostId":"1107863941","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107863941","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624004900,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107863941?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-18 16:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107863941","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi","content":"<p>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p><p><blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>蔡周四表示,该交易包括价值1.04亿美元的优先股和9.86亿美元的普通股股权价值,企业价值为29亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>根据该公司的声明,三菱慧聪资本已提出每股56美元现金,较CAI最后收盘价溢价46.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,该交易已获得CAI董事会的一致批准,并补充说,交易完成后,CAI的股票将不再在纽约证券交易所上市。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.<blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-18 16:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.</p><p><blockquote>CAI股价盘前飙升近45%,因该公司已同意三菱慧聪资本公司(Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.)以11亿美元收购。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2922db8924ea9786a2bc69ae8bfc166\" tg-width=\"1289\" tg-height=\"605\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">The deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>蔡周四表示,该交易包括价值1.04亿美元的优先股和9.86亿美元的普通股股权价值,企业价值为29亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Mitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.</p><p><blockquote>根据该公司的声明,三菱慧聪资本已提出每股56美元现金,较CAI最后收盘价溢价46.8%。</blockquote></p><p> The deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.</p><p><blockquote>该公司表示,该交易已获得CAI董事会的一致批准,并补充说,交易完成后,CAI的股票将不再在纽约证券交易所上市。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAI":"Caris Life Sciences, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107863941","content_text":"CAI shares soared nearly 45% in pre-market,as it has agreed to a $1.1 billion takeover by Mitsubishi HC Capital Inc.\nThe deal consists of $104 million worth of preferred stock and $986 million of common stock equity value, and has an enterprise value of $2.9 billion, CAI said on Thursday.\nMitsubishi HC Capital has offered $56 per share in cash according to the company's statement, marking a 46.8% premium over CAI's last closing price.\nThe deal has been unanimously approved by CAI's board of directors, the company said, adding that shares of CAI will no longer be listed on the New York Stock Exchange after the deal is completed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CAI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":543,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":130693453,"gmtCreate":1621528395672,"gmtModify":1631891125524,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/130693453","repostId":"1180231636","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":447,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813312078,"gmtCreate":1630130879495,"gmtModify":1704956410646,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/813312078","repostId":"1162964424","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162964424","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630111098,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1162964424?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-28 08:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162964424","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is con","content":"<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些组件的价格上涨,苹果的iPhone 13可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或者那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待更深入地了解他们的口袋。DigiTimes报道称,由于零部件通胀,苹果的iPhone 13可能会在下个月以更高的价格推出。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是个坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,苹果公司可能会成为一个巨大的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>怎么回事?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max机型售价高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高3%至5%,这可能会导致尚未公布的iPhone 13价格出现类似上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能试图提高价格,而不相信这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响。苹果或许有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>引用吉姆·克莱默的话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市最令人担忧的阻力之一是通胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致2021-2022年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高的生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会表现出色。这是Mad Money的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时……我想让你问问自己,如果公司提价,你会对提价麻木不仁吗?有哪些公司可以提价而不会激怒你?去买他们的股票。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么涨价也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界真正的运作方式。价格的变化往往会对一些关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果更高的价格不会对售出的单位产生太大影响或根本没有影响,那么这对收入以及最有可能的盈利来说是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一个需要考虑的问题是价格上涨是否完全或仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设是后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。许多移动部件所呈现的复杂性使得很难确定更昂贵的iPhone未来可能会如何影响苹果的财务报表。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: How It Could Be A Great Inflation Play<blockquote>苹果股票:它如何成为一场伟大的通胀游戏</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-28 08:38</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.</p><p><blockquote>由于某些组件的价格上涨,苹果的iPhone 13可能会让消费者花费更多。这对用户来说是个坏消息,但对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> IPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.</p><p><blockquote>考虑今年升级设备的IPhone用户(或者那些希望转向基于iOS的产品的用户)应该期待更深入地了解他们的口袋。DigiTimes报道称,由于零部件通胀,苹果的iPhone 13可能会在下个月以更高的价格推出。</blockquote></p><p> Bad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.</p><p><blockquote>对消费者来说是个坏消息,对苹果股票投资者来说可能是个好消息。如果价格上涨得到证实,这将提供证据表明,在人们担心生产者和消费者价格上涨的时期,苹果公司可能会成为一个巨大的通胀工具。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6f4ac9ebc1b90072340731dc5c1e613\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1:苹果的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened?</b></p><p><blockquote><b>怎么回事?</b></blockquote></p><p> The iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.</p><p><blockquote>iPhone已经被认为是一款昂贵的科技产品,在美国,满载的高端12 Pro Max机型售价高达1400美元(见下图)。由于今年的零部件短缺,芯片制造商台积电可能会将其对苹果的零部件价格提高3%至5%,这可能会导致尚未公布的iPhone 13价格出现类似上涨。</blockquote></p><p> It is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.</p><p><blockquote>世界上最大、最成功的消费品公司之一不太可能试图提高价格,而不相信这样做不会对新iPhone的需求产生实质性影响。苹果或许有能力提高价格,因为该公司了解其奢侈品牌的价值和吸引力。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0140b9b68bb9eb5dd7e88aaff384785d\" tg-width=\"707\" tg-height=\"370\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2:苹果商店上的iPhone 12 Pro。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>A quote from Jim Cramer</b></p><p><blockquote><b>引用吉姆·克莱默的话</b></blockquote></p><p> One of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.</p><p><blockquote>在可预见的未来,股市最令人担忧的阻力之一是通胀可能侵蚀企业利润率并导致2021-2022年利率上升。但如果生产者和消费者价格飙升,并非所有股票都会受到同等影响。</blockquote></p><p> Generally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:</p><p><blockquote>一般来说,拥有强大定价权、能够将较高的生产成本转嫁给消费者的公司可能会表现出色。这是Mad Money的吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramer)最近提出的观点。以下是他的名言:</blockquote></p><p> “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.” <b>The impact to the P&L</b></p><p><blockquote>“当你试图思考这个市场上什么在起作用时……我想让你问问自己,如果公司提价,你会对提价麻木不仁吗?有哪些公司可以提价而不会激怒你?去买他们的股票。”<b>对损益的影响</b></blockquote></p><p> Are higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.</p><p><blockquote>价格上涨对公司的财务业绩是好事还是坏事?答案是微妙的,取决于几个因素。</blockquote></p><p> Holding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.</p><p><blockquote>在其他条件不变的情况下,更高的价格也意味着更高的收入(想想销售公式:价格乘以数量)。如果价格上涨与产品或运营成本的增加脱钩,那么涨价也有助于提高利润率,从而提高利润。</blockquote></p><p> However, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.</p><p><blockquote>然而,“保持其他一切不变”并不是世界真正的运作方式。价格的变化往往会对一些关键变量产生影响,其中最重要的是需求。如果更高的价格不会对售出的单位产生太大影响或根本没有影响,那么这对收入以及最有可能的盈利来说是个好消息。</blockquote></p><p> The other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.</p><p><blockquote>另一个需要考虑的问题是价格上涨是否完全或仅部分抵消了更高的成本。假设是后者,收入仍然可以受益,而不会对利润率和利润产生相应的积极影响。许多移动部件所呈现的复杂性使得很难确定更昂贵的iPhone未来可能会如何影响苹果的财务报表。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/iphone/apple-stock-how-it-could-be-a-great-inflation-play","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162964424","content_text":"Apple’s iPhone 13 could cost consumers more due to an increase in the price of certain components. This is bad news for users, but probably good news for Apple stock investors.\nIPhone users thinking of upgrading their devices this year (or those looking to switch to the iOS-based product) should expect to reach deeper into their pockets. DigiTimes has reported that Apple’s iPhone 13 could be launched next month at a higher price due to parts inflation.\nBad news for consumers could be great news for Apple stock investors. If the price increase is confirmed, it provides evidence that AAPL might be a great inflation play during these times of worry over rising producer and consumer prices.\nFigure 1: Apple's iPhone 12 Pro.\nWhat happened?\nThe iPhone is already considered a pricey tech gadget that can cost as much as $1,400 for the fully loaded, higher-end 12 Pro Max model in the US (see figure below). Due to this year’s components shortage, chip maker TSMC may raise its part prices to Apple by 3% to 5%, which could lead to a similar increase in the price of the yet-to-be-announced iPhone 13.\nIt is unlikely that one of the largest and most successful consumer product companies in the world would try to raise prices without confidence that doing so does not impact demand for the new iPhone substantially. Apple can probably afford to hike prices because the company understands the value and the appeal of its luxury brand.\nFigure 2: iPhone 12 Pro on Apple's store.\nA quote from Jim Cramer\nOne of the most concerning headwinds to stocks in the foreseeable future is the possibility of inflation eroding corporate margins and leading to higher interest rates in 2021-2022. But should producer and consumer prices spike, not all stocks will be impacted equally.\nGenerally speaking, companies with strong pricing power that are able to pass on the higher production costs to consumers will likely outperform. This is a point that Mad Money’s Jim Cramer has made recently. Here is his quote:\n\n “When you try to think of what’s working in this market... I want you to ask yourself, would you be insensitive to a price increase if the company put one through? [What are] the companies that can raise prices without infuriating you? Go buy their stocks.”\n\nThe impact to the P&L\nAre higher prices a good or a bad thing for a company’s financial performance? The answer is nuanced and depends on a few factors.\nHolding all else constant, higher prices also mean higher revenues (think of the formula for sales: price times quantity). If the increase in price is decoupled from an increase in product or operating costs, then the hike also helps to boost margins – thus profits as well.\nHowever, “holding all else constant” is not how the world really works. A change in price tends to have an impact on a few key variables, most important of which is demand. If higher prices do not impact units sold by much or at all, this is great news for revenues and, most likely, earnings.\nThe other piece to consider is whether the price hike fully or only partially offsets higher costs. Assuming the latter, revenues can still benefit without a corresponding positive effect on margins and profits. The complexity presented by the many moving parts makes it hard to determine with certainty how a more expensive iPhone may impact Apple’s financial statements in the future.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126845582,"gmtCreate":1624553344246,"gmtModify":1631884872664,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment and like thanks ","listText":"Comment and like thanks ","text":"Comment and like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/126845582","repostId":"1198422658","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1549,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184759603,"gmtCreate":1623726480802,"gmtModify":1631888945921,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like pls","listText":"Comment n like pls","text":"Comment n like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184759603","repostId":"1102470114","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140102650,"gmtCreate":1625634408270,"gmtModify":1631884872642,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like n comment ","listText":"Like n comment ","text":"Like n comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140102650","repostId":"1163143630","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1563,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":882097426,"gmtCreate":1631629795265,"gmtModify":1631884763967,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S51.SI\">$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$</a>Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S51.SI\">$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$</a>Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","text":"$SEMBCORP MARINE LTD(S51.SI)$Why Sembcorp share price keep dropping?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/882097426","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1616,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171376593,"gmtCreate":1626709282712,"gmtModify":1631884872600,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Commen and like ","listText":"Commen and like ","text":"Commen and like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/171376593","repostId":"1146536243","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146536243","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626683272,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146536243?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 16:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Morgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146536243","media":"zerohedge","summary":"This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.","content":"<p>We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.</p><p><blockquote>我们认为这个经济周期将是正常的、强劲的、短暂的。这些假设中的每一个都受到市场的激烈争论。每一项都是我们投资策略的关键。</blockquote></p><p> The debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.</p><p><blockquote>关于周期“常态”的争论是不言自明的。毫不夸张地说,疫情造成了有记录以来最大幅度的产出下降。随后,在政策支持的帮助下,经济活动迅速回升。将这种情况视为独特的,不同于其他周期性经历的理由是,这种暴力的下跌和上涨从未允许传统的“重置”。</blockquote></p><p> But 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.</p><p><blockquote>但市场中的“正常”是一个有趣的概念,记忆的粗糙边缘往往会随着时间的推移而变得光滑和抛光。2003-07年的周期以大萧条以来最大的银行和房地产危机结束。1992-2000年的周期以巨大的股票泡沫破裂、广泛的会计欺诈和难以言喻的悲剧而告终。“正常”周期在理论上很好,但在实践中更难。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.</p><p><blockquote>相反,让我们考虑一下为什么我们使用术语“周期”。经济和市场往往遵循周期性模式,这些模式往往会在市场表现中显现出来。我们关心的是那些模式,如果它们仍然适用,它们可以在不确定的地形中提供有用的指导。</blockquote></p><p> Was last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.</p><p><blockquote>去年的衰退之前是否存在收益率曲线倒挂、低波动性、低失业率、高消费者信心和股市广度收窄等周期后期条件?是的。由此产生的股票、信贷、收益率和收益率曲线的低谷是否符合市场和经济低点之间的通常节奏?他们做到了。随后反弹的领头羊是否是通常的早期周期赢家,如小型股和周期性股票、高收益信贷和工业金属?他们是。</blockquote></p><p> If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should <i>continue</i> to do so.</p><p><blockquote>如果它像鸭子一样走路,像鸭子一样嘎嘎叫,我们认为这是一个正常的循环。或者这些事情实际上是正常的。如果到目前为止已经发生了很多“正常”的循环行为,那么它应该<i>继续</i>这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).</p><p><blockquote>具体来说,这与市场复苏时的表现模式有关。随着复苏的推进,这些模式应该会发生变化。正如我的同事迈克尔·威尔逊所指出的,我们认为我们正在进入周期中期市场,尽管距离经济活动低点仅16个月。我们看到当前状况与2004年上半年有许多相似之处,2004年上半年是大幅通货再膨胀反弹之后的周期中期。重要的是,尽管最近对增长感到担忧,但我们认为全球复苏将继续推进(见增长恐慌周年纪念,2021年7月11日)。</blockquote></p><p> Because one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.<b>It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.</b></p><p><blockquote>因为人们总能找到适合他们特定周期观点的指标,所以我们长期以来一直是综合指数的粉丝。这就是我们的“周期模型”,它结合了美国宏观、信贷周期和企业侵略性的十个指标,以衡量我们在市场周期中的位置。在2019年6月进入周期后期“低迷”和2020年4月进入周期早期“修复”后,该指数飙升。<b>它上升得如此之快,以至于已经过了下一个阶段(“复苏”),直接进入了“扩张”。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41879c4f66b33597ee236bdd52841004\" tg-width=\"904\" tg-height=\"490\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Thisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',<b>and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends</b>. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.<b>It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.</b>This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.</p><p><blockquote>这很不寻常。“扩张”意味着捕捉“比正常情况更好且正在改善”的条件,<b>自1980年以来,“低迷”结束后平均需要35个月才能实现这一目标</b>它的迅速到来表明,在巨大的政策支持下,经济正在迅速复苏。<b>这也暗示了另一种可能性:这个更热的周期可能会更短。</b>这是我们的论点,它体现在我们的定量测量中。</blockquote></p><p> All this has a number of implications:</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都有许多含义:</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul> <li><b>The shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases</b>. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.</li> <li><b>In many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low</b>. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.</li> <li><b>In equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios</b>. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.</li> <li><b>Interest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model</b>. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.</li> </ul> This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>周期越短,信贷相对于其他风险资产越差;信贷从“繁荣”中获得的收益较少,如果下一次衰退提前到来,信贷就会面临风险,并且随着企业信心的增强,信贷将面临更多的供应</b>在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国IG和HY Credit N1200万超额回报分别比平均水平差29个基点和161个基点。</li><li><b>在其中许多时期,尽管违约率仍然很低,但信贷表现却参差不齐</b>投资者应该尝试承担违约风险而不是利差风险:我们的信用策略师喜欢持有CDX HY 0-15%,并用CDX IG付款人利差进行对冲。</li><li><b>在股票方面,我们认为我们的模型支持投资组合更加平衡</b>我们看好美国和欧洲的医疗保健行业,因为该行业具有几个良好的因素:质量、低估值、高利差和低波动性。从全球来看,欧洲和日本的股市往往跑赢“中期周期”,我们认为它们可以再次这样做。</li><li><b>利率对复苏过于悲观。在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国10年期国债1200万奈拉回报率比平均水平低97个基点</b>.Guneet Dhingra和我们的美国利率策略团队在全球资产配置中转移了跑输大盘美国10年期国债,而我们反过来又转移了跑输大盘政府债券。</li></ul>这种循环是不寻常的。大多数“正常”周期都是。我们认为复苏是可持续的,而且更有可能“更热、更短”。出售国债并相信扩张。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley: This Cycle Will Be \"Hotter But Shorter\" Than Usual<blockquote>摩根士丹利:本轮周期将比往常“更热但更短”</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">zerohedge</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 16:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.</p><p><blockquote>我们认为这个经济周期将是正常的、强劲的、短暂的。这些假设中的每一个都受到市场的激烈争论。每一项都是我们投资策略的关键。</blockquote></p><p> The debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.</p><p><blockquote>关于周期“常态”的争论是不言自明的。毫不夸张地说,疫情造成了有记录以来最大幅度的产出下降。随后,在政策支持的帮助下,经济活动迅速回升。将这种情况视为独特的,不同于其他周期性经历的理由是,这种暴力的下跌和上涨从未允许传统的“重置”。</blockquote></p><p> But 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.</p><p><blockquote>但市场中的“正常”是一个有趣的概念,记忆的粗糙边缘往往会随着时间的推移而变得光滑和抛光。2003-07年的周期以大萧条以来最大的银行和房地产危机结束。1992-2000年的周期以巨大的股票泡沫破裂、广泛的会计欺诈和难以言喻的悲剧而告终。“正常”周期在理论上很好,但在实践中更难。</blockquote></p><p> Instead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.</p><p><blockquote>相反,让我们考虑一下为什么我们使用术语“周期”。经济和市场往往遵循周期性模式,这些模式往往会在市场表现中显现出来。我们关心的是那些模式,如果它们仍然适用,它们可以在不确定的地形中提供有用的指导。</blockquote></p><p> Was last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.</p><p><blockquote>去年的衰退之前是否存在收益率曲线倒挂、低波动性、低失业率、高消费者信心和股市广度收窄等周期后期条件?是的。由此产生的股票、信贷、收益率和收益率曲线的低谷是否符合市场和经济低点之间的通常节奏?他们做到了。随后反弹的领头羊是否是通常的早期周期赢家,如小型股和周期性股票、高收益信贷和工业金属?他们是。</blockquote></p><p> If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should <i>continue</i> to do so.</p><p><blockquote>如果它像鸭子一样走路,像鸭子一样嘎嘎叫,我们认为这是一个正常的循环。或者这些事情实际上是正常的。如果到目前为止已经发生了很多“正常”的循环行为,那么它应该<i>继续</i>这样做。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).</p><p><blockquote>具体来说,这与市场复苏时的表现模式有关。随着复苏的推进,这些模式应该会发生变化。正如我的同事迈克尔·威尔逊所指出的,我们认为我们正在进入周期中期市场,尽管距离经济活动低点仅16个月。我们看到当前状况与2004年上半年有许多相似之处,2004年上半年是大幅通货再膨胀反弹之后的周期中期。重要的是,尽管最近对增长感到担忧,但我们认为全球复苏将继续推进(见增长恐慌周年纪念,2021年7月11日)。</blockquote></p><p> Because one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.<b>It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.</b></p><p><blockquote>因为人们总能找到适合他们特定周期观点的指标,所以我们长期以来一直是综合指数的粉丝。这就是我们的“周期模型”,它结合了美国宏观、信贷周期和企业侵略性的十个指标,以衡量我们在市场周期中的位置。在2019年6月进入周期后期“低迷”和2020年4月进入周期早期“修复”后,该指数飙升。<b>它上升得如此之快,以至于已经过了下一个阶段(“复苏”),直接进入了“扩张”。</b></blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41879c4f66b33597ee236bdd52841004\" tg-width=\"904\" tg-height=\"490\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Thisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',<b>and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends</b>. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.<b>It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.</b>This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.</p><p><blockquote>这很不寻常。“扩张”意味着捕捉“比正常情况更好且正在改善”的条件,<b>自1980年以来,“低迷”结束后平均需要35个月才能实现这一目标</b>它的迅速到来表明,在巨大的政策支持下,经济正在迅速复苏。<b>这也暗示了另一种可能性:这个更热的周期可能会更短。</b>这是我们的论点,它体现在我们的定量测量中。</blockquote></p><p> All this has a number of implications:</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都有许多含义:</blockquote></p><p></p><p> <ul> <li><b>The shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases</b>. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.</li> <li><b>In many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low</b>. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.</li> <li><b>In equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios</b>. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.</li> <li><b>Interest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model</b>. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.</li> </ul> This cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>周期越短,信贷相对于其他风险资产越差;信贷从“繁荣”中获得的收益较少,如果下一次衰退提前到来,信贷就会面临风险,并且随着企业信心的增强,信贷将面临更多的供应</b>在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国IG和HY Credit N1200万超额回报分别比平均水平差29个基点和161个基点。</li><li><b>在其中许多时期,尽管违约率仍然很低,但信贷表现却参差不齐</b>投资者应该尝试承担违约风险而不是利差风险:我们的信用策略师喜欢持有CDX HY 0-15%,并用CDX IG付款人利差进行对冲。</li><li><b>在股票方面,我们认为我们的模型支持投资组合更加平衡</b>我们看好美国和欧洲的医疗保健行业,因为该行业具有几个良好的因素:质量、低估值、高利差和低波动性。从全球来看,欧洲和日本的股市往往跑赢“中期周期”,我们认为它们可以再次这样做。</li><li><b>利率对复苏过于悲观。在我们周期模型的“扩张”阶段,美国10年期国债1200万奈拉回报率比平均水平低97个基点</b>.Guneet Dhingra和我们的美国利率策略团队在全球资产配置中转移了跑输大盘美国10年期国债,而我们反过来又转移了跑输大盘政府债券。</li></ul>这种循环是不寻常的。大多数“正常”周期都是。我们认为复苏是可持续的,而且更有可能“更热、更短”。出售国债并相信扩张。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-cycle-will-be-hotter-shorter-usual\">zerohedge</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/morgan-stanley-cycle-will-be-hotter-shorter-usual","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146536243","content_text":"We think that this economic cycle will be normal, strong and short. Each of these assumptions is being hotly debated by the market. Each is key to our investment strategy.\nThe debate over cycle 'normalcy' is self-explanatory. The pandemic created, without exaggeration, the single sharpest decline in output in recorded history. Then activity raced back, helped by policy support. The case for viewing this situation as unique, and distinct from other cyclical experiences, is based on the view that a fall and rise this violent never allowed for a traditional 'reset'.\nBut 'normal' in markets is a funny concept, with the rough edges of memory often smoothed and polished by the passage of time. The cycle of 2003-07 ended with the largest banking and housing crisis since the Great Depression. The cycle of 1992-2000 ended with the bursting of an enormous equity bubble, widespread accounting fraud and unspeakable tragedy. 'Normal' cycles are nice in theory, harder in practice.\nInstead, let’s consider why we use the term ‘cycle’ at all. Economies and markets tend to follow cyclical patterns, patterns that tend to show up in market performance. It is those patterns we care about, and if they still apply, they can provide a useful guide in uncertain terrain.\nWas last year’s recession preceded by late-cycle conditions such as an inverted yield curve, low volatility, low unemployment, high consumer confidence and narrowing equity market breadth? It was. Did the resulting troughs in equities, credit, yields and yield curves match the usual cadence between market and economic lows? They did. And were the leaders of the ensuing rally the usual early-cycle winners, like small and cyclical stocks, high yield credit and industrial metals? They were.\nIf it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we think that it’s a normal cycle. Or as normal as these things realistically are. If a lot of 'normal' cycle behavior has played out so far, it should continue to do so.\nSpecifically, this relates to patterns of performance as the market recovers. And as that recovery advances, those patterns should shift. As noted by my colleague Michael Wilson, we think that we are moving to a mid-cycle market, despite being just 16 months removed from the lows of economic activity. We see a number of similarities between current conditions and 1H04, a mid-cycle period that followed a large, reflationary rally. And importantly, despite recent fears about growth, we think that the global recovery will keep pushing on (see The Growth Scare Anniversary, July 11, 2021).\nBecause one can always find an indicator that fits their particular cycle view, we’ve long been fans of a composite. That’s our ‘cycle model’, which combines ten US metrics across macro, the credit cycle and corporate aggression to gauge where we are in the market cycle. After moving into late-cycle ‘downturn’ in June 2019, and early-cycle ‘repair’ in April 2020, it’s rocketed higher.It has risen so fast that it’s blown right past what should be the next phase ('recovery'), and moved right into ‘expansion’.\nThisis unusual. ‘Expansion’ is meant to capture conditions that are 'better than normal, and improving',and since 1980, it has taken an average of 35 months to get there after 'downturn' ends. Its speedy arrival speaks to a speedy recovery powered by enormous policy support.It also hints at another possibility: this hotter cycle could be shorter.This is our thesis, and it’s showing up in our quantitative measure.\nAll this has a number of implications:\n\nThe shorter the cycle, the worse for credit relative to other risky assets; credit enjoys fewer of the gains from the 'boom', is exposed if the next downturn is early, and faces more supply as corporate confidence increases. In the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model, US IG and HY credit N12M excess returns are 29bp and 161bp worse than average, respectively.\nIn many of those periods, more mixed credit performance occurs despite default rates remaining low. Investors should try to take default risk over spread risk: our credit strategists like owning CDX HY 0-15%, and hedging with CDX IG payer spreads.\nIn equities, we think that our model supports more balance in portfolios. We like healthcare in both the US and Europe as a sector with several nice factor exposures: quality, low valuation, high carry and low volatility. Globally, equities in Europe and Japan have tended to outperform 'mid-cycle', and we think that they can do so again.\nInterest rates are too pessimistic on the recovery. US 10-year Treasury N12M returns are 97bp worse than average during the ‘expansion’ phase of our cycle model. Guneet Dhingra and our US interest rate strategy team have moved underweight US 10-year Treasuries, and we in turn have moved back underweight government bonds in our global asset allocation.\n\nThis cycle is unusual. Most 'normal' cycles are. We think that the recovery is sustainable and more likely to be ‘hotter and shorter’. Sell Treasuries and trust the expansion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1546,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185350907,"gmtCreate":1623634323709,"gmtModify":1631888945924,"author":{"id":"3582537029352499","authorId":"3582537029352499","name":"shyan1314","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f73aa4765cdeef5a3dd85d161972ff8","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582537029352499","authorIdStr":"3582537029352499"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Comment n like thanks ","listText":"Comment n like thanks ","text":"Comment n like thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/185350907","repostId":"1167404259","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}