kisshen的个人主页 - 老虎社区

kisshen

kisshen

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

4关注

0粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-02-13

Cool

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-18

$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$money

2021-02-13

Cool

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-10

Cool

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-19

$Walt Disney(DIS)$money

2021-01-29

Nice article

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-19

Uwu

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-19

Mennn

Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>

2021-02-19

Bbb

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-18

Cool

22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573541934435244","uuid":"3573541934435244","gmtCreate":1610451000168,"gmtModify":1611918346986,"name":"kisshen","pinyin":"kisshen","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":21,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-3","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"偶像虎友","description":"加入老虎社区1500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.87%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.77%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":363416161,"gmtCreate":1614162978953,"gmtModify":1634550932330,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","text":"$Walt Disney(DIS)$money","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2826a77f6170cad175eedc22b0e2cba5","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/363416161","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1572,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387886386,"gmtCreate":1613736391945,"gmtModify":1634552439191,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Uwu","listText":"Uwu","text":"Uwu","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387886386","repostId":"1131795735","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1729,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387888424,"gmtCreate":1613736376568,"gmtModify":1634552439558,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Gg","listText":"Gg","text":"Gg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387888424","repostId":"1103921295","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103921295","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613706165,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103921295?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 11:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103921295","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressiona","content":"<p>  <b>Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.</b>  YOLO? Maybe not quite so.</p><p><blockquote><b>Robinhood首席执行官Vlad Tenev在关于游戏驿站兴衰的国会听证会上讨论了平均账户规模和用户人口统计数据。</b>约洛？也许不完全是这样。</blockquote></p><p> During the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.</p><p><blockquote>在游戏驿站交易狂潮期间，一些观察人士担心，许多在Reddit的WallStreetBets等网站上聚集在一起的新手散户投资者会下大赌注——用论坛的俚语来说就是所谓的“YOLO交易”——最终输得很惨。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.</p><p><blockquote>盈透证券集团创始人兼董事长托马斯·彼得菲表示，毫无疑问，这是一个震惊股市的严重事件，使其“危险地接近”崩溃。</blockquote></p><p> But at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.</p><p><blockquote>但在周四举行的备受关注的关于游戏驿站股票和其他所谓“模因股票”涨跌的国会听证会上，交易风暴中的一位关键人物的声明显示，年轻投资者通常不会下大赌注以获得快速收益。</blockquote></p><p> “Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood首席执行官弗拉德·特涅夫(Vlad Tenev)表示：“与一些极具误导性和高度不知情的报道相反，我们看到证据表明我们的大多数客户都在进行长期投资。”Robinhood是一个受欢迎的交易平台，因暂时限制GameStopGME的交易而引起了大规模关注，-11.43%，AMC EntertainmentAMC，-0.72%和其他几家公司。随着听证会的继续，他在议员的提问下重复了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> “What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫在听证会前提交的准备好的证词中写道：“我们所看到的通常与流行的模因不一致，这些模因表明我们的大多数经纪客户都是不成熟的日内交易者，在复杂的金融产品上投入大量资金承担了过度的风险。”他的公司鼓励在一个拥有1300万用户的平台上进行鲁莽交易的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Just 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.</p><p><blockquote>他说，只有2%的Robinhood用户符合“模式日内交易者”的资格，他们在五个工作日内进行了四笔或更多交易。13%的人交易基本期权合约，这可能比直接买入或卖出风险更高，回报更高。</blockquote></p><p> In the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>面对一些尖锐的问题，他还坚称Robinhood并没有试图将用户体验变成游戏。“我们知道投资是严肃的，这就是为什么我们的大多数客户都是买入并持有，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> (Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)</p><p><blockquote>（在游戏驿站事件发生之前，马萨诸塞州监管机构对Robinhood提起诉讼，指控其让交易看起来太有趣，直到发生损失。该公司此前表示对这一指控提出异议。）</blockquote></p><p> Tenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫和立法者就罗宾汉在游戏驿站传奇中应该做什么和不应该做什么进行了争论。游戏驿站股价一度交易到483美元的高点。截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价为40.69美元。</blockquote></p><p> But either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.</p><p><blockquote>但不管怎样，特涅夫的证词让我们有趣地了解了谁是最新的散户投资者以及他们向市场投入了多少资金。毕竟，在游戏驿站大戏开始之前，散户投资者就已经越来越多地进入股市。</blockquote></p><p> Fifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.</p><p><blockquote>根据aGallup去年的调查，55%的美国人直接拥有股票，而18至29岁的人中有32%表示他们拥有股票。</blockquote></p><p> The median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood投资者的平均年龄为31岁，一半的用户表示他们是首次投资者。根据Tenev的声明，账户规模中位数约为240美元，平均账户规模约为5,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”</p><p><blockquote>13%的Robinhood用户正在交易期权，这一事实让一些倡导者犹豫了。美国消费者联合会投资者保护主任芭芭拉·罗珀(Barbara Roper)表示，“考虑到Robinhood客户群的特征（不成比例的年轻、账户较小的首次投资者），我们发现这一比例相当高。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.</p><p><blockquote>根据特涅夫的证词，Robinhood投资者的种族也往往更加多元化。根据Tenev的声明，9%的用户是黑人，而其他公司的这一比例为3%；16%是西班牙裔，而其他公司的这一比例为7%。</blockquote></p><p> “Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.</p><p><blockquote>卡托研究所金融监管研究主任詹妮弗·舒尔普(Jennifer Schulp)表示：“构成这一新浪潮的散户投资者有所不同。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”</p><p><blockquote>舒尔普说，散户投资者在华尔街被戏称为“傻钱”。“我认为这是一种侮辱。我认为这个词需要被抛弃。我认为游戏驿站的情况证明散户投资者正在彻底改变市场……我认为这里的散户投资者正在边做边学，这是最好的学习方式之一。”</blockquote></p><p> She pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，FINRA投资者教育基金会本月早些时候发布的研究深入研究了新散户投资者的人口统计数据和账户余额。</blockquote></p><p> One-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.</p><p><blockquote>2020年首次开设应税投资账户的新投资者中有三分之一表示，他们的账户余额低于500美元，而经验丰富的投资者这一比例为16%。23%的新投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。20%有经验的投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，新投资者的种族更加多元化，17%的新投资者是黑人。调查显示，有经验的投资者中有7%是黑人。</blockquote></p><p> As the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.</p><p><blockquote>随着听证会的继续，一些议员质疑是否需要设置更多护栏，而另一些议员则表示，议员不应该屈尊于散户投资者，并认为他们最了解。</blockquote></p><p> “Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”</p><p><blockquote>众议院金融服务委员会主席、众议员玛克辛·沃特斯表示：“许多美国人认为这个体系对他们不利，无论如何，华尔街总是获胜。”“在这种情况下，许多散户投资者似乎是出于在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街的愿望，考虑到许多散户投资者因系统波动而遭受的损失，许多人认为该系统是针对他们的操纵行为得到了加强。”</blockquote></p><p> The GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.</p><p><blockquote>该委员会资深共和党众议员Patrick McHenry表示，游戏驿站事件是一个“根本性的变化”。社交媒体和投资者唾手可得的大量新信息推动了交易的激增。</blockquote></p><p> “I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”</p><p><blockquote>麦克亨利说：“我认为，如果说我们从过去几周中学到了什么的话，那就是这些普通的日常投资者非常老练。”“群众有智慧。”</blockquote></p><p> The government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”</p><p><blockquote>他说，政府需要让普通投资者更容易买入市场。“与其通过新法规、新形式的税收或所谓的保护措施将美国公众拒之门外，不如利用这个机会站在他们一边。”</blockquote></p><p> One of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.</p><p><blockquote>目击者之一是基思·吉尔(Keith Gill)，他是一位34岁的独立投资者，拥有“咆哮的小猫”等在线账号，他将自己在游戏驿站的投资变成了数百万美元。他告诉国会，他所有的投资决策都是根据公开信息做出的。</blockquote></p><p> “I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”</p><p><blockquote>吉尔说：“我是第一个承认投资股票和期权风险极高的人，人们在投资前进行彻底的研究非常重要。”“人们应该能够自由表达他们对股票的看法，并且他们应该能够根据这些观点购买或不购买股票。”</blockquote></p><p> GameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up nearly 3% and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;is up more than 4% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨近116%。2021年，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨近3%，标普500上涨超过4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop hearing challenges assumptions about rookie investors<blockquote>游戏驿站听证会挑战有关新手投资者的假设</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 11:42</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  <b>Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.</b>  YOLO? Maybe not quite so.</p><p><blockquote><b>Robinhood首席执行官Vlad Tenev在关于游戏驿站兴衰的国会听证会上讨论了平均账户规模和用户人口统计数据。</b>约洛？也许不完全是这样。</blockquote></p><p> During the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.</p><p><blockquote>在游戏驿站交易狂潮期间，一些观察人士担心，许多在Reddit的WallStreetBets等网站上聚集在一起的新手散户投资者会下大赌注——用论坛的俚语来说就是所谓的“YOLO交易”——最终输得很惨。</blockquote></p><p> No doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.</p><p><blockquote>盈透证券集团创始人兼董事长托马斯·彼得菲表示，毫无疑问，这是一个震惊股市的严重事件，使其“危险地接近”崩溃。</blockquote></p><p> But at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.</p><p><blockquote>但在周四举行的备受关注的关于游戏驿站股票和其他所谓“模因股票”涨跌的国会听证会上，交易风暴中的一位关键人物的声明显示，年轻投资者通常不会下大赌注以获得快速收益。</blockquote></p><p> “Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood首席执行官弗拉德·特涅夫(Vlad Tenev)表示：“与一些极具误导性和高度不知情的报道相反，我们看到证据表明我们的大多数客户都在进行长期投资。”Robinhood是一个受欢迎的交易平台，因暂时限制GameStopGME的交易而引起了大规模关注，-11.43%，AMC EntertainmentAMC，-0.72%和其他几家公司。随着听证会的继续，他在议员的提问下重复了这一点。</blockquote></p><p> “What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫在听证会前提交的准备好的证词中写道：“我们所看到的通常与流行的模因不一致，这些模因表明我们的大多数经纪客户都是不成熟的日内交易者，在复杂的金融产品上投入大量资金承担了过度的风险。”他的公司鼓励在一个拥有1300万用户的平台上进行鲁莽交易的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Just 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.</p><p><blockquote>他说，只有2%的Robinhood用户符合“模式日内交易者”的资格，他们在五个工作日内进行了四笔或更多交易。13%的人交易基本期权合约，这可能比直接买入或卖出风险更高，回报更高。</blockquote></p><p> In the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>面对一些尖锐的问题，他还坚称Robinhood并没有试图将用户体验变成游戏。“我们知道投资是严肃的，这就是为什么我们的大多数客户都是买入并持有，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> (Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)</p><p><blockquote>（在游戏驿站事件发生之前，马萨诸塞州监管机构对Robinhood提起诉讼，指控其让交易看起来太有趣，直到发生损失。该公司此前表示对这一指控提出异议。）</blockquote></p><p> Tenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.</p><p><blockquote>特涅夫和立法者就罗宾汉在游戏驿站传奇中应该做什么和不应该做什么进行了争论。游戏驿站股价一度交易到483美元的高点。截至周四收盘，游戏驿站股价为40.69美元。</blockquote></p><p> But either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.</p><p><blockquote>但不管怎样，特涅夫的证词让我们有趣地了解了谁是最新的散户投资者以及他们向市场投入了多少资金。毕竟，在游戏驿站大戏开始之前，散户投资者就已经越来越多地进入股市。</blockquote></p><p> Fifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.</p><p><blockquote>根据aGallup去年的调查，55%的美国人直接拥有股票，而18至29岁的人中有32%表示他们拥有股票。</blockquote></p><p> The median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.</p><p><blockquote>Robinhood投资者的平均年龄为31岁，一半的用户表示他们是首次投资者。根据Tenev的声明，账户规模中位数约为240美元，平均账户规模约为5,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”</p><p><blockquote>13%的Robinhood用户正在交易期权，这一事实让一些倡导者犹豫了。美国消费者联合会投资者保护主任芭芭拉·罗珀(Barbara Roper)表示，“考虑到Robinhood客户群的特征（不成比例的年轻、账户较小的首次投资者），我们发现这一比例相当高。”</blockquote></p><p> Robinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.</p><p><blockquote>根据特涅夫的证词，Robinhood投资者的种族也往往更加多元化。根据Tenev的声明，9%的用户是黑人，而其他公司的这一比例为3%；16%是西班牙裔，而其他公司的这一比例为7%。</blockquote></p><p> “Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.</p><p><blockquote>卡托研究所金融监管研究主任詹妮弗·舒尔普(Jennifer Schulp)表示：“构成这一新浪潮的散户投资者有所不同。”</blockquote></p><p> Retail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”</p><p><blockquote>舒尔普说，散户投资者在华尔街被戏称为“傻钱”。“我认为这是一种侮辱。我认为这个词需要被抛弃。我认为游戏驿站的情况证明散户投资者正在彻底改变市场……我认为这里的散户投资者正在边做边学，这是最好的学习方式之一。”</blockquote></p><p> She pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，FINRA投资者教育基金会本月早些时候发布的研究深入研究了新散户投资者的人口统计数据和账户余额。</blockquote></p><p> One-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.</p><p><blockquote>2020年首次开设应税投资账户的新投资者中有三分之一表示，他们的账户余额低于500美元，而经验丰富的投资者这一比例为16%。23%的新投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。20%有经验的投资者的账户余额高达2,000美元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，新投资者的种族更加多元化，17%的新投资者是黑人。调查显示，有经验的投资者中有7%是黑人。</blockquote></p><p> As the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.</p><p><blockquote>随着听证会的继续，一些议员质疑是否需要设置更多护栏，而另一些议员则表示，议员不应该屈尊于散户投资者，并认为他们最了解。</blockquote></p><p> “Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”</p><p><blockquote>众议院金融服务委员会主席、众议员玛克辛·沃特斯表示：“许多美国人认为这个体系对他们不利，无论如何，华尔街总是获胜。”“在这种情况下，许多散户投资者似乎是出于在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街的愿望，考虑到许多散户投资者因系统波动而遭受的损失，许多人认为该系统是针对他们的操纵行为得到了加强。”</blockquote></p><p> The GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.</p><p><blockquote>该委员会资深共和党众议员Patrick McHenry表示，游戏驿站事件是一个“根本性的变化”。社交媒体和投资者唾手可得的大量新信息推动了交易的激增。</blockquote></p><p> “I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”</p><p><blockquote>麦克亨利说：“我认为，如果说我们从过去几周中学到了什么的话，那就是这些普通的日常投资者非常老练。”“群众有智慧。”</blockquote></p><p> The government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”</p><p><blockquote>他说，政府需要让普通投资者更容易买入市场。“与其通过新法规、新形式的税收或所谓的保护措施将美国公众拒之门外，不如利用这个机会站在他们一边。”</blockquote></p><p> One of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.</p><p><blockquote>目击者之一是基思·吉尔(Keith Gill)，他是一位34岁的独立投资者，拥有“咆哮的小猫”等在线账号，他将自己在游戏驿站的投资变成了数百万美元。他告诉国会，他所有的投资决策都是根据公开信息做出的。</blockquote></p><p> “I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”</p><p><blockquote>吉尔说：“我是第一个承认投资股票和期权风险极高的人，人们在投资前进行彻底的研究非常重要。”“人们应该能够自由表达他们对股票的看法，并且他们应该能够根据这些观点购买或不购买股票。”</blockquote></p><p> GameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;is up nearly 3% and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;is up more than 4% in 2021.</p><p><blockquote>游戏驿站股价今年迄今已上涨近116%。2021年，道琼斯工业平均指数上涨近3%，标普500上涨超过4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/gamestop-hearing-challenges-assumptions-about-rookie-investors-retail-investors-making-up-this-new-surge-are-different-11613680041?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/gamestop-hearing-challenges-assumptions-about-rookie-investors-retail-investors-making-up-this-new-surge-are-different-11613680041?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1103921295","content_text":"Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev discussed average account sizes and user demographics during a congressional hearing on GameStop’s rise and fall.\n\nYOLO? Maybe not quite so.\nDuring the GameStop trading frenzy, some observers worried many rookie retail investors banding together on sites like Reddit’s WallStreetBets would bet big — a so-called “YOLO trade” in the forum’sslang— andend up losing badly.\nNo doubt, this wasa serious event that rocked the stock market, bringing it “dangerously close” to collapse, according to Thomas Peterffy, founder and chairman of Interactive Brokers Group.\nBut at a closely-watched congressional hearing Thursday on the rise and fall of GameStop shares and other so-called “meme stocks,” statements by one of the key players in the trading firestorm revealed that young investors generally aren’t betting big to reap quick gains.\n“Contrary to some very misleading and highly uninformed reports, we see evidence that most of our customers are investing for the long term,” said Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, the popular trading platform that caughtmassive irefor temporarily restricting trades on GameStopGME,-11.43%,AMC EntertainmentAMC,-0.72%and several other companies. As the hearing continued, he repeated that point under lawmaker questions.\n“What we see is generally not consistent with popular memes suggesting that most of our brokerage customers are unsophisticated day traders taking inordinate risks with large sums of money on complex financial products,”Tenev wrote in prepared testimony submitted ahead of the hearing,pushing back on the idea that his companyencouraged reckless tradingon a platform with 13 million users.\nJust 2% of Robinhood users qualified as “pattern day traders” who made four or more trades within five business days, he said. Thirteen percent traded basic options contracts, which can be higher risk, higher reward than straight-ahead buying or selling.\nIn the face of some pointed questions, he also insisted Robinhood isn’t trying to turn the user experience into a game. “We know investing is serious and that’s why most of our customers are buy and hold,” he said.\n(Before the GameStop saga, Massachusetts state regulators filed a complaint against Robinhood for allegedly making trading seem too fun until loses occur. The company previously said itdisputes the allegation.)\nTenev and lawmakershave sparredon what Robinhood should and shouldn’t have done during the GameStop saga. GameStop shares once traded at a high point of $483. By Thursday’s market close, GameStop shares were $40.69.\nBut either way, Tenev’s testimony gave an interesting peek at who the newest retail investors are and how much money they are pouring into the market. After all, retail investors were already increasingly entering the stock market before the GameStop drama started.\nFifty-five percent of Americans directly own stock, according to aGallup surveylast year, while 32% of 18- to 29-year-olds said they owned stock.\nThe median age of Robinhood investors is 31 and half of users say they are first-time investors. The median account size is about $240, according to Tenev’s statement, and the average account size is about $5,000.\nThe fact that 13% of Robinhood users are trading options gives some advocates pause. Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America,saidthat “strikes us as a pretty high percentage when you consider the characteristics of Robinhood’s customer base (disproportionately young, first-time investors with small accounts).”\nRobinhood investors also tend to be a slightly more racially diverse crowd, according to Tenev’s testimony. Nine percent of users are Black, compared to 3% at other firms and 16% are Hispanic, versus 7% at other firms, according to Tenev’s statement.\n“Retail investors making up this new surge are different,” testified Jennifer Schulp, the Cato Institute’s director of financial regulation studies.\nRetail investors are nicknamed as“dumb money”on Wall Street, Schulp said. “I think it’s insulting. I think the term needs to go out the window. I think the GameStop situation is proof the retail investors are revolutionizing the market …. I think the retail investors here are learning by doing, which is one of the best ways to learn.”\nShe pointed to research from theFINRA Investor Education Foundationreleased earlier this month digging into the demographics and account balances of new retail investors.\nOne-third of new investors who opened a taxable investment account for the first time in 2020 said they had account balances of less than $500, versus 16% of experienced investors. Twenty-three percent of new investors had account balances up to $2,000. Twenty percent of experienced investors had account balances up to $2,000.\nThe survey found a more racially diverse set of new investors, with 17% of new investors being Black. Seven percent of experienced investors are Black, the poll said.\nAs the hearing continued, some lawmakers questioned whether more guardrails need to be in place, while others said lawmakers shouldn’t condescend to retail investors and assume they know best.\n“Many Americans feel that the system is stacked against them and no matter what, Wall Street always wins,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee. “In this instance, many retail investors appeared motivated by a desire to beat Wall Street at its own game and given the losses that many retail investors have sustained as a result of volatility in the system, there are many whose beliefs that the system is rigged against them has been reinforced.”\nThe GameStop saga was a “fundamental change,” said Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican on the committee. The swell in trading was propelled by social media and a wealth of new information at investors’ fingertips.\n“I think if we’ve learned anything from these past few weeks, it’s that these average everyday investors are pretty darn sophisticated,” McHenry said. “There is wisdom to the crowd.”\nThe government needs to make it easier for everyday investors to buy into the market, he said. “Instead of shutting the American public out through new regulations, new forms of taxation or so-called protections, let’s use this opprotunity to side with them.”\nOne of the witnesses was Keith Gill, a 34-year-old independent investor with online handles like “Roaring Kitty” who turned his GameStop investment into millions. He made all his investment decisions based on publicly-availabile information, he told Congress.\n“I would be the first to acknowledge that investing in stocks and options is incredibly risky, and it’s so important for people to do their own thorough research before investing,” Gill said. “Folks should be able to freely express their views on a stock, and they should be able to buy or not buy a stock based on those views.”\nGameStop shares are up nearly 116% year-to-date. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is up nearly 3% and the S&P 500 is up more than 4% in 2021.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1553,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387881492,"gmtCreate":1613736298616,"gmtModify":1634552440275,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Mennn","listText":"Mennn","text":"Mennn","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387881492","repostId":"1161529893","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161529893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613733842,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161529893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161529893","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by so","content":"<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-鲍尔弗(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 19:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-鲍尔弗(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161529893","content_text":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\n\nRobo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.\nNow anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.\n“Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\nAlthough the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.\n“People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.\nGoldman Sachs declined to comment.\nThe company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.\nFees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.\nThe median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.\nRobo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.\nRobo investing as a self-driving car\nConsumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.\nThe rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.\nSo what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.\nYou put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.\nRobo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.\nThere are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.\nAnd rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.\nCynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.\nAs she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”\nRobos appeal to inexperienced investors\nRobo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.\nThat makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.\n“When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”\nThat said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”\nOthers disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.\n“Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.\nThere is often no door to knock on\nYour robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.\nIt won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.\n“The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.\nNot all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.\nAdditionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.\nFor instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.\nBut with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.\nOn top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.\n“If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.\nDon’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.\nBut not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.\nThe results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387881119,"gmtCreate":1613736271831,"gmtModify":1634552440620,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Bbb","listText":"Bbb","text":"Bbb","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387881119","repostId":"1179306002","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1368,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387883776,"gmtCreate":1613736243195,"gmtModify":1634552440965,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","text":"$Walt Disney(DIS)$money","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/db9c70e2a4e093d07bedf532ea566df6","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387883776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384800147,"gmtCreate":1613633830289,"gmtModify":1634552859727,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384800147","repostId":"1124565484","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124565484","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613631190,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124565484?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-18 14:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124565484","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both hav","content":"<p><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p><blockquote><b>他的伯克希尔哈撒韦集团最近开始购买威瑞森和雪佛龙的股票——这两家公司的股息收益率都很有吸引力，并得到了预期现金流的良好支持。</b>沃伦·巴菲特对某只股票投下信任票并不意味着你应该追随这一潮流，但这位伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司首席执行官的长期业绩记录不言而喻。这个人知道如何发现便宜货。</blockquote></p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p><blockquote>下面是受巴菲特两只新精选股票启发的股票屏幕，这些股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，预计自由现金流将充分覆盖。</blockquote></p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p><blockquote>随着其他投资者的耳朵竖起来，巴菲特新投资头寸的消息可能会推高股价。此前，Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK于2月16日晚披露已购买Verizon Communications Inc.VZ和Chevron Corp.CVX的股票，这两只股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，其中一只与加权估值相比定价较低标普500指数SPX。</blockquote></p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股价在2月17日早盘交易中上涨3%，雪佛龙股价上涨3.5%。随着股息再投资，Verizon继2020年业绩持平后，截至2月16日，2021年股价下跌了7%。雪佛龙2月17日早些时候上涨1.5%，继2020年下跌26%后，2021年已上涨12%。随着投资者展望大流行后的生活，油价正在上涨。西德克萨斯中质原油从10月31日收盘到2月16日收盘上涨了68%，最终收于每桶60.05美元。</blockquote></p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>以下所有内容均基于2月16日的收盘价以及FactSet调查的分析师对未来12个月的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股票的预期市盈率为10.7，而标普500的加权总预期市盈率为22.5。该股的股息率为4.64%。</blockquote></p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p><blockquote>衡量公司支付股息（并希望提高股息）能力的一种方法是查看其自由现金流，即计划资本支出后的剩余现金流。这笔钱可用于任何公司目的，包括扩张、股票回购或增加股息。我们可以通过将跟踪或估计的自由现金流除以当前股价来衡量公司的自由现金流收益率。由于2020年美国经济受到干扰，随后的所有自由现金流收益率均采用未来12个报告月的共识估计。</blockquote></p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p><blockquote>Verizion的远期自由现金流收益率为8.97%，比当前股息有4.34%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p><blockquote>雪佛龙股票的远期市盈率为24.8，高于标普500。话又说回来，预计2021年将是石油和天然气的复苏年，分析师的盈利预期可能没有赶上燃料大宗商品价格的上涨。雪佛龙的股息收益率为5.54%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.99%，还有2.45%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><blockquote>这并不是说巴菲特过度关注高股息收益率的股票。他不是。在该公司2月16日披露的公开交易持股中，有很多公司不支付股息，包括亚马逊公司（AMZN）、百健公司（Biogen Inc.BIIB）、Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand通用汽车公司（General Motors Co.GM），后者暂停了季度股息。四月。</blockquote></p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p><blockquote><b>巴菲特股息股票屏幕</b></blockquote></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><blockquote>根据巴菲特选择的Verizon和Chevron并排除Berkshire Hathaway尚未持有的股票，以下是标普500中股息收益率至少为4.00%的22只股票，可获得2021年的自由现金流估计，并有净空指示。该列表按股息收益率排序。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p><blockquote>滚动表格查看所有数据，包括2021年和2020年的远期市盈率和总回报。</blockquote></p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p><blockquote>对于房地产投资信托基金来说，衡量股息支付能力的行业标准是运营资金，这是一个非公认会计准则数字，将折旧和摊销加回收益中，并减去出售财产的收益。因此，表中的“估计FCF收益率”栏中使用了远期FFO估计值。</blockquote></p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><p><blockquote>该名单不包括伯克希尔哈撒韦公司已持有的四只股票——威瑞森、雪佛龙和另外两只股票：</blockquote></p><p></p><p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>艾伯维公司ABBV的股息收益率为4.99%，远期自由现金流收益率为10.54%，净空为5.55%。</li><li>卡夫亨氏公司KHChas的股息收益率为4.52%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.59%，净空为3.06%。该公司于2019年2月将股息削减了三分之一以上。</li></ul>高股息收益率可能表明投资者对公司的业务前景或其长期维持股息的能力感到不满，尽管自由现金流收益率很高。例如，榜单上收益率最高的股票是Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN，该公司在9月份更名之前是CenturyLink。股息率为8.48%。CenturyLink在2013年2月授权20亿美元股票回购计划的同一天，将季度股息削减了26%。该公司的季度股息仍为每股54美分，直到2019年2月削减至目前的每股25美分。截至2月16日的五年里，Lumen/CenturyLink的股价在股息再投资后下跌了34%，而10年来股价下跌了38%。</blockquote></p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p><blockquote>名单上其他在过去10年中削减股息的公司包括Williams Cos.WMB、Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI、Vornado Realty TrustVNO和Simon Property Group Inc.SPG，后者在6月份将派息减少了38%。</blockquote></p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都强调了如果您在这里看到任何感兴趣的股票，请进行自己的研究以形成自己对公司长期前景的看法的重要性。</blockquote></p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p><p><blockquote>除了CenturyLink之外，上面列出的远期市盈率估值最低的股票是AT&amp;T Inc.T，股息收益率为7.18%，市盈率为9.2，其次是辉瑞Inc.PFE，收益率为4.50%，远期市盈率为10.3。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-18 14:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p><blockquote><b>他的伯克希尔哈撒韦集团最近开始购买威瑞森和雪佛龙的股票——这两家公司的股息收益率都很有吸引力，并得到了预期现金流的良好支持。</b>沃伦·巴菲特对某只股票投下信任票并不意味着你应该追随这一潮流，但这位伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司首席执行官的长期业绩记录不言而喻。这个人知道如何发现便宜货。</blockquote></p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p><blockquote>下面是受巴菲特两只新精选股票启发的股票屏幕，这些股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，预计自由现金流将充分覆盖。</blockquote></p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p><blockquote>随着其他投资者的耳朵竖起来，巴菲特新投资头寸的消息可能会推高股价。此前，Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK于2月16日晚披露已购买Verizon Communications Inc.VZ和Chevron Corp.CVX的股票，这两只股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，其中一只与加权估值相比定价较低标普500指数SPX。</blockquote></p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股价在2月17日早盘交易中上涨3%，雪佛龙股价上涨3.5%。随着股息再投资，Verizon继2020年业绩持平后，截至2月16日，2021年股价下跌了7%。雪佛龙2月17日早些时候上涨1.5%，继2020年下跌26%后，2021年已上涨12%。随着投资者展望大流行后的生活，油价正在上涨。西德克萨斯中质原油从10月31日收盘到2月16日收盘上涨了68%，最终收于每桶60.05美元。</blockquote></p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>以下所有内容均基于2月16日的收盘价以及FactSet调查的分析师对未来12个月的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股票的预期市盈率为10.7，而标普500的加权总预期市盈率为22.5。该股的股息率为4.64%。</blockquote></p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p><blockquote>衡量公司支付股息（并希望提高股息）能力的一种方法是查看其自由现金流，即计划资本支出后的剩余现金流。这笔钱可用于任何公司目的，包括扩张、股票回购或增加股息。我们可以通过将跟踪或估计的自由现金流除以当前股价来衡量公司的自由现金流收益率。由于2020年美国经济受到干扰，随后的所有自由现金流收益率均采用未来12个报告月的共识估计。</blockquote></p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p><blockquote>Verizion的远期自由现金流收益率为8.97%，比当前股息有4.34%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p><blockquote>雪佛龙股票的远期市盈率为24.8，高于标普500。话又说回来，预计2021年将是石油和天然气的复苏年，分析师的盈利预期可能没有赶上燃料大宗商品价格的上涨。雪佛龙的股息收益率为5.54%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.99%，还有2.45%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><blockquote>这并不是说巴菲特过度关注高股息收益率的股票。他不是。在该公司2月16日披露的公开交易持股中，有很多公司不支付股息，包括亚马逊公司（AMZN）、百健公司（Biogen Inc.BIIB）、Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand通用汽车公司（General Motors Co.GM），后者暂停了季度股息。四月。</blockquote></p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p><blockquote><b>巴菲特股息股票屏幕</b></blockquote></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><blockquote>根据巴菲特选择的Verizon和Chevron并排除Berkshire Hathaway尚未持有的股票，以下是标普500中股息收益率至少为4.00%的22只股票，可获得2021年的自由现金流估计，并有净空指示。该列表按股息收益率排序。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p><blockquote>滚动表格查看所有数据，包括2021年和2020年的远期市盈率和总回报。</blockquote></p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p><blockquote>对于房地产投资信托基金来说，衡量股息支付能力的行业标准是运营资金，这是一个非公认会计准则数字，将折旧和摊销加回收益中，并减去出售财产的收益。因此，表中的“估计FCF收益率”栏中使用了远期FFO估计值。</blockquote></p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><p><blockquote>该名单不包括伯克希尔哈撒韦公司已持有的四只股票——威瑞森、雪佛龙和另外两只股票：</blockquote></p><p></p><p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>艾伯维公司ABBV的股息收益率为4.99%，远期自由现金流收益率为10.54%，净空为5.55%。</li><li>卡夫亨氏公司KHChas的股息收益率为4.52%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.59%，净空为3.06%。该公司于2019年2月将股息削减了三分之一以上。</li></ul>高股息收益率可能表明投资者对公司的业务前景或其长期维持股息的能力感到不满，尽管自由现金流收益率很高。例如，榜单上收益率最高的股票是Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN，该公司在9月份更名之前是CenturyLink。股息率为8.48%。CenturyLink在2013年2月授权20亿美元股票回购计划的同一天，将季度股息削减了26%。该公司的季度股息仍为每股54美分，直到2019年2月削减至目前的每股25美分。截至2月16日的五年里，Lumen/CenturyLink的股价在股息再投资后下跌了34%，而10年来股价下跌了38%。</blockquote></p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p><blockquote>名单上其他在过去10年中削减股息的公司包括Williams Cos.WMB、Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI、Vornado Realty TrustVNO和Simon Property Group Inc.SPG，后者在6月份将派息减少了38%。</blockquote></p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都强调了如果您在这里看到任何感兴趣的股票，请进行自己的研究以形成自己对公司长期前景的看法的重要性。</blockquote></p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p><p><blockquote>除了CenturyLink之外，上面列出的远期市盈率估值最低的股票是AT&amp;T Inc.T，股息收益率为7.18%，市盈率为9.2，其次是辉瑞Inc.PFE，收益率为4.50%，远期市盈率为10.3。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IPG":"埃培智","IRM":"爱恩铁山","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔","REG":"Regency Centers Corp","AMCR":"AMCOR PLC","VNO":"沃那多房信","LUMN":"Lumen Technologies","PFE":"辉瑞","O":"Realty Income Corp","PSX":"Phillips 66","DOW":"陶氏化学","OKE":"欧尼克（万欧卡）","SLG":"SL Green Realty Corp","KMI":"金德尔摩根","IP":"国际纸业","BXP":"BXP Inc","SPG":"西蒙地产","MPC":"马拉松原油","WMB":"威廉姆斯","T":"At&T","FRT":"FRT信托"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124565484","content_text":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&P 500 IndexSPX.Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.A Buffett dividend stock screenWorking from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BXP":0.9,"FRT":0.9,"IRM":0.9,"OKE":0.9,"DOW":0.9,"MPC":0.9,"LUMN":0.9,"T":0.9,"IPG":0.9,"SPG":0.9,"REG":0.9,"PFE":0.9,"IP":0.9,"VNO":0.9,"O":0.9,"AMCR":0.9,"KMI":0.9,"WMB":0.9,"PSX":0.9,"SLG":0.9,"K":0.9,"LYB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2428,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384177755,"gmtCreate":1613633802077,"gmtModify":1634552859973,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384177755","repostId":"1187263688","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3120,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384177870,"gmtCreate":1613633758090,"gmtModify":1631888317301,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FVRR\">$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$</a>money","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FVRR\">$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$</a>money","text":"$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$money","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b358636ed63dc3b71825e5dafe61c36e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384177870","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1857,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386218488,"gmtCreate":1613183579744,"gmtModify":1634554228596,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/386218488","repostId":"2110044852","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386218322,"gmtCreate":1613183493666,"gmtModify":1634554229080,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/386218322","repostId":"2110904027","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":381229334,"gmtCreate":1612968542528,"gmtModify":1703767680964,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/381229334","repostId":"1186964240","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":383877249,"gmtCreate":1612869336181,"gmtModify":1703766042408,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good stocks","listText":"Good stocks","text":"Good stocks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/383877249","repostId":"2110500970","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":318,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":383877822,"gmtCreate":1612869319266,"gmtModify":1703766041893,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/383877822","repostId":"2110500970","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":511,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317343252,"gmtCreate":1612421584476,"gmtModify":1703761606097,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Bzbzbzbbzbz","listText":"Bzbzbzbbzbz","text":"Bzbzbzbbzbz","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/263b0a5f93bbf7f747b2193ad433c52f","width":"1080","height":"2738"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/317343252","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":453,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314950608,"gmtCreate":1612289518704,"gmtModify":1703760069795,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314950608","repostId":"1131925624","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":677,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314950151,"gmtCreate":1612289497373,"gmtModify":1703760069440,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314950151","repostId":"1124029270","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124029270","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612251638,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124029270?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-02 15:40","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Oil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124029270","media":"reuters","summary":"TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cuttin","content":"<p>TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>东京（路透社）-油价周二上涨约1%，此前主要产油国表示，他们正在按照克制承诺削减原油产量，支撑了因冠状病毒疫情期间需求疲软而失衡的市场。</blockquote></p><p> Brent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote>截至格林威治标准时间0134，布伦特原油上涨51美分，或0.9%，至每桶56.86美元，而美国原油上涨53美分，或1%，至每桶54.08美元。两合约前一交易日涨幅均超过2%。</blockquote></p><p> OPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.</p><p><blockquote>路透调查发现，OPEC 1月份原油产量连续第七个月增加，此前该组织及其盟友同意进一步放松供应限制，但增幅小于预期。</blockquote></p><p> The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，石油输出国组织1月份的日产量为2575万桶，比12月份增加了16万桶。</blockquote></p><p> Russian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.</p><p><blockquote>俄罗斯1月份产量增加，但符合减产协议，而哈萨克斯坦当月石油产量下降。这两个国家都是欧佩克+集团的成员，该集团联合起来通过减产来帮助支撑价格。</blockquote></p><p> “The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.</p><p><blockquote>axi全球市场策略师Stephen Innes表示：“昨天油市复苏反弹的关键启示是，OPEC+成员国似乎将减产承诺铭记在心。”</blockquote></p><p> “Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“让欧佩克+在同一个赞美诗页面上演唱对每个石油交易商来说都是美妙的音乐，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Russian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>两位熟悉数据的消息人士周一告诉路透社，在达成限产协议后，俄罗斯1月份石油和天然气凝析油产量较12月份增加12万桶/日，至1,016万桶/日。</blockquote></p><p> Kazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>据两位知情的业内消息人士和路透社周一的计算结果显示，由于停电，哈萨克斯坦1月份的石油产量环比削减了2%，这也改善了其对OPEC+协议的遵守情况。</blockquote></p><p> Helping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.</p><p><blockquote>帮助支撑价格，袭击美国东北部大片地区的严重暴风雪正在推高取暖燃料需求。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-02 15:40</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>东京（路透社）-油价周二上涨约1%，此前主要产油国表示，他们正在按照克制承诺削减原油产量，支撑了因冠状病毒疫情期间需求疲软而失衡的市场。</blockquote></p><p> Brent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote>截至格林威治标准时间0134，布伦特原油上涨51美分，或0.9%，至每桶56.86美元，而美国原油上涨53美分，或1%，至每桶54.08美元。两合约前一交易日涨幅均超过2%。</blockquote></p><p> OPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.</p><p><blockquote>路透调查发现，OPEC 1月份原油产量连续第七个月增加，此前该组织及其盟友同意进一步放松供应限制，但增幅小于预期。</blockquote></p><p> The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，石油输出国组织1月份的日产量为2575万桶，比12月份增加了16万桶。</blockquote></p><p> Russian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.</p><p><blockquote>俄罗斯1月份产量增加，但符合减产协议，而哈萨克斯坦当月石油产量下降。这两个国家都是欧佩克+集团的成员，该集团联合起来通过减产来帮助支撑价格。</blockquote></p><p> “The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.</p><p><blockquote>axi全球市场策略师Stephen Innes表示：“昨天油市复苏反弹的关键启示是，OPEC+成员国似乎将减产承诺铭记在心。”</blockquote></p><p> “Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“让欧佩克+在同一个赞美诗页面上演唱对每个石油交易商来说都是美妙的音乐，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Russian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>两位熟悉数据的消息人士周一告诉路透社，在达成限产协议后，俄罗斯1月份石油和天然气凝析油产量较12月份增加12万桶/日，至1,016万桶/日。</blockquote></p><p> Kazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>据两位知情的业内消息人士和路透社周一的计算结果显示，由于停电，哈萨克斯坦1月份的石油产量环比削减了2%，这也改善了其对OPEC+协议的遵守情况。</blockquote></p><p> Helping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.</p><p><blockquote>帮助支撑价格，袭击美国东北部大片地区的严重暴风雪正在推高取暖燃料需求。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-prices-extend-rally-as-producers-restrain-output-idUSKBN2A205Q?il=0\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3faadc006e67e6ac130a7b171f263b4d","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-prices-extend-rally-as-producers-restrain-output-idUSKBN2A205Q?il=0","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124029270","content_text":"TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.\nBrent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.\nOPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.\nThe Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.\nRussian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.\n“The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.\n“Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.\nRussian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.\nKazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.\nHelping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CLmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":542,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314950380,"gmtCreate":1612289483940,"gmtModify":1703760069613,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Hhhh","listText":"Hhhh","text":"Hhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314950380","repostId":"1124029270","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124029270","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1612251638,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124029270?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-02 15:40","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Oil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124029270","media":"reuters","summary":"TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cuttin","content":"<p>TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>东京（路透社）-油价周二上涨约1%，此前主要产油国表示，他们正在按照克制承诺削减原油产量，支撑了因冠状病毒疫情期间需求疲软而失衡的市场。</blockquote></p><p> Brent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote>截至格林威治标准时间0134，布伦特原油上涨51美分，或0.9%，至每桶56.86美元，而美国原油上涨53美分，或1%，至每桶54.08美元。两合约前一交易日涨幅均超过2%。</blockquote></p><p> OPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.</p><p><blockquote>路透调查发现，OPEC 1月份原油产量连续第七个月增加，此前该组织及其盟友同意进一步放松供应限制，但增幅小于预期。</blockquote></p><p> The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，石油输出国组织1月份的日产量为2575万桶，比12月份增加了16万桶。</blockquote></p><p> Russian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.</p><p><blockquote>俄罗斯1月份产量增加，但符合减产协议，而哈萨克斯坦当月石油产量下降。这两个国家都是欧佩克+集团的成员，该集团联合起来通过减产来帮助支撑价格。</blockquote></p><p> “The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.</p><p><blockquote>axi全球市场策略师Stephen Innes表示：“昨天油市复苏反弹的关键启示是，OPEC+成员国似乎将减产承诺铭记在心。”</blockquote></p><p> “Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“让欧佩克+在同一个赞美诗页面上演唱对每个石油交易商来说都是美妙的音乐，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Russian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>两位熟悉数据的消息人士周一告诉路透社，在达成限产协议后，俄罗斯1月份石油和天然气凝析油产量较12月份增加12万桶/日，至1,016万桶/日。</blockquote></p><p> Kazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>据两位知情的业内消息人士和路透社周一的计算结果显示，由于停电，哈萨克斯坦1月份的石油产量环比削减了2%，这也改善了其对OPEC+协议的遵守情况。</blockquote></p><p> Helping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.</p><p><blockquote>帮助支撑价格，袭击美国东北部大片地区的严重暴风雪正在推高取暖燃料需求。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil prices rise as producers commit to output restraint<blockquote>产油国承诺限制产量油价上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-02 15:40</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>东京（路透社）-油价周二上涨约1%，此前主要产油国表示，他们正在按照克制承诺削减原油产量，支撑了因冠状病毒疫情期间需求疲软而失衡的市场。</blockquote></p><p> Brent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.</p><p><blockquote>截至格林威治标准时间0134，布伦特原油上涨51美分，或0.9%，至每桶56.86美元，而美国原油上涨53美分，或1%，至每桶54.08美元。两合约前一交易日涨幅均超过2%。</blockquote></p><p> OPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.</p><p><blockquote>路透调查发现，OPEC 1月份原油产量连续第七个月增加，此前该组织及其盟友同意进一步放松供应限制，但增幅小于预期。</blockquote></p><p> The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.</p><p><blockquote>调查发现，石油输出国组织1月份的日产量为2575万桶，比12月份增加了16万桶。</blockquote></p><p> Russian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.</p><p><blockquote>俄罗斯1月份产量增加，但符合减产协议，而哈萨克斯坦当月石油产量下降。这两个国家都是欧佩克+集团的成员，该集团联合起来通过减产来帮助支撑价格。</blockquote></p><p> “The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.</p><p><blockquote>axi全球市场策略师Stephen Innes表示：“昨天油市复苏反弹的关键启示是，OPEC+成员国似乎将减产承诺铭记在心。”</blockquote></p><p> “Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.</p><p><blockquote>“让欧佩克+在同一个赞美诗页面上演唱对每个石油交易商来说都是美妙的音乐，”他补充道。</blockquote></p><p> Russian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>两位熟悉数据的消息人士周一告诉路透社，在达成限产协议后，俄罗斯1月份石油和天然气凝析油产量较12月份增加12万桶/日，至1,016万桶/日。</blockquote></p><p> Kazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.</p><p><blockquote>据两位知情的业内消息人士和路透社周一的计算结果显示，由于停电，哈萨克斯坦1月份的石油产量环比削减了2%，这也改善了其对OPEC+协议的遵守情况。</blockquote></p><p> Helping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.</p><p><blockquote>帮助支撑价格，袭击美国东北部大片地区的严重暴风雪正在推高取暖燃料需求。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-prices-extend-rally-as-producers-restrain-output-idUSKBN2A205Q?il=0\">reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3faadc006e67e6ac130a7b171f263b4d","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil/oil-prices-extend-rally-as-producers-restrain-output-idUSKBN2A205Q?il=0","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124029270","content_text":"TOKYO (Reuters) - Oil prices rose around 1% on Tuesday after major producers showed they were cutting crude output in line with their commitments on restraint, supporting a market thrown out of kilter by weak demand during the coronavirus pandemic.\nBrent crude was up 51 cents, or 0.9%, at $56.86 a barrel by 0134 GMT, while U.S. oil gained 53 cents, or 1%, to $54.08 a barrel. Both contracts rose more than 2% in the previous session.\nOPEC crude production increased for a seventh month in January, a Reuters survey found, after the group and its allies agreed to ease supply curbs further, but the growth was smaller than expected.\nThe Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was pumping 25.75 million barrels per day (bpd) in January, the survey found, up 160,000 bpd from December.\nRussian output increased in January but in line with the agreement on reducing production, while in Kazakhstan oil volume fell for the month. Both countries are members of the OPEC+ grouping that banded together to help support prices with production cuts.\n“The critical take away from yesterday’s oil market recovery rally is that OPEC+ members seem to be taking their commitment to output cuts to the heart,” said Stephen Innes, global markets strategist at axi.\n“Having OPEC+ singing from the same hymn page is music to every oil trader’s ears,” he added.\nRussian oil and gas condensate output rose by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 10.16 million bpd in January from December, following the agreement on production restraint, two sources familiar with the data told Reuters on Monday.\nKazakhstan cut its oil production by 2% in January from the previous month due to power outages, which also improved its compliance with the OPEC+ deal, two industry sources familiar with the matter said and Reuters calculations showed on Monday.\nHelping to support prices, a severe blizzard hitting a large area of the northeastern United States is pushing up demand for heating fuel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CLmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":291,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314950007,"gmtCreate":1612289431709,"gmtModify":1703760069269,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/314950007","repostId":"1113370222","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316326924,"gmtCreate":1611917154968,"gmtModify":1703756181106,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice article","listText":"Nice article","text":"Nice article","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/316326924","repostId":"1130139919","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":386218488,"gmtCreate":1613183579744,"gmtModify":1634554228596,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/386218488","repostId":"2110044852","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384177870,"gmtCreate":1613633758090,"gmtModify":1631888317301,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FVRR\">$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$</a>money","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FVRR\">$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$</a>money","text":"$Fiverr International Ltd.(FVRR)$money","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b358636ed63dc3b71825e5dafe61c36e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384177870","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1857,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":386218322,"gmtCreate":1613183493666,"gmtModify":1634554229080,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/386218322","repostId":"2110904027","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":381229334,"gmtCreate":1612968542528,"gmtModify":1703767680964,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/381229334","repostId":"1186964240","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387883776,"gmtCreate":1613736243195,"gmtModify":1634552440965,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">$Walt Disney(DIS)$</a>money","text":"$Walt Disney(DIS)$money","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/db9c70e2a4e093d07bedf532ea566df6","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387883776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316326924,"gmtCreate":1611917154968,"gmtModify":1703756181106,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Nice article","listText":"Nice article","text":"Nice article","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/316326924","repostId":"1130139919","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387886386,"gmtCreate":1613736391945,"gmtModify":1634552439191,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Uwu","listText":"Uwu","text":"Uwu","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387886386","repostId":"1131795735","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1729,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387881492,"gmtCreate":1613736298616,"gmtModify":1634552440275,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Mennn","listText":"Mennn","text":"Mennn","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387881492","repostId":"1161529893","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161529893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613733842,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161529893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161529893","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by so","content":"<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-鲍尔弗(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 19:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.  Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说，就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二，高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在，任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法，每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示，在跳上机器人投资列车之前，需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样，众议院通常会获胜，”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说，他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”，但他表示，公司通常会提出这样的报价，以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一，包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW，+1.03%，以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始，传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现，投资组合越大，客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在1%左右，对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合，年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金，而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间，消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告，与去年第四季度相比，2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢？把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地，在后座系好安全带，你的司机（机器人顾问）就会到达那里。作为乘客，如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向，你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地，也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件，根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务，每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%，而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖，而不是完全自己投资，这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点，她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说，嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队，负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控，尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写：“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是，选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是，机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件，在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说，这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心，随着时间的推移，让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-鲍尔弗(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示，这使得你更容易承受市场波动，因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时，你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦，我需要摆脱困境’，”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关，因为他们知道你的时间范围，他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说，“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问，你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意，并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关，机器人投资就是其中之一，”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现，他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式，而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做，”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而，它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子，并想开始为他们的教育存钱，或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议？该平台是否提供建议？如果提供，复杂程度如何？”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议，提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外，纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示，机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如，投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱，而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说，传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资，为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的，这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是，虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式，特别是对于初学者来说，它可能会“使投资过于复杂”，马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下，并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合，我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问，”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说，不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资，该基金选择单一基金进行投资，并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年，MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合，投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说，结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示，机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161529893","content_text":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\n\nRobo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.\nNow anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.\n“Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\nAlthough the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.\n“People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.\nGoldman Sachs declined to comment.\nThe company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.\nFees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.\nThe median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.\nRobo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.\nRobo investing as a self-driving car\nConsumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.\nThe rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.\nSo what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.\nYou put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.\nRobo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.\nThere are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.\nAnd rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.\nCynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.\nAs she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”\nRobos appeal to inexperienced investors\nRobo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.\nThat makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.\n“When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”\nThat said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”\nOthers disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.\n“Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.\nThere is often no door to knock on\nYour robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.\nIt won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.\n“The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.\nNot all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.\nAdditionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.\nFor instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.\nBut with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.\nOn top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.\n“If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.\nDon’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.\nBut not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.\nThe results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387881119,"gmtCreate":1613736271831,"gmtModify":1634552440620,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Bbb","listText":"Bbb","text":"Bbb","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/387881119","repostId":"1179306002","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1368,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384800147,"gmtCreate":1613633830289,"gmtModify":1634552859727,"author":{"id":"3573541934435244","authorId":"3573541934435244","name":"kisshen","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79cc40796df591cdf313292948053635","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3573541934435244","idStr":"3573541934435244"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384800147","repostId":"1124565484","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124565484","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613631190,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1124565484?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-18 14:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124565484","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both hav","content":"<p><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p><blockquote><b>他的伯克希尔哈撒韦集团最近开始购买威瑞森和雪佛龙的股票——这两家公司的股息收益率都很有吸引力，并得到了预期现金流的良好支持。</b>沃伦·巴菲特对某只股票投下信任票并不意味着你应该追随这一潮流，但这位伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司首席执行官的长期业绩记录不言而喻。这个人知道如何发现便宜货。</blockquote></p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p><blockquote>下面是受巴菲特两只新精选股票启发的股票屏幕，这些股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，预计自由现金流将充分覆盖。</blockquote></p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p><blockquote>随着其他投资者的耳朵竖起来，巴菲特新投资头寸的消息可能会推高股价。此前，Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK于2月16日晚披露已购买Verizon Communications Inc.VZ和Chevron Corp.CVX的股票，这两只股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，其中一只与加权估值相比定价较低标普500指数SPX。</blockquote></p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股价在2月17日早盘交易中上涨3%，雪佛龙股价上涨3.5%。随着股息再投资，Verizon继2020年业绩持平后，截至2月16日，2021年股价下跌了7%。雪佛龙2月17日早些时候上涨1.5%，继2020年下跌26%后，2021年已上涨12%。随着投资者展望大流行后的生活，油价正在上涨。西德克萨斯中质原油从10月31日收盘到2月16日收盘上涨了68%，最终收于每桶60.05美元。</blockquote></p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>以下所有内容均基于2月16日的收盘价以及FactSet调查的分析师对未来12个月的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股票的预期市盈率为10.7，而标普500的加权总预期市盈率为22.5。该股的股息率为4.64%。</blockquote></p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p><blockquote>衡量公司支付股息（并希望提高股息）能力的一种方法是查看其自由现金流，即计划资本支出后的剩余现金流。这笔钱可用于任何公司目的，包括扩张、股票回购或增加股息。我们可以通过将跟踪或估计的自由现金流除以当前股价来衡量公司的自由现金流收益率。由于2020年美国经济受到干扰，随后的所有自由现金流收益率均采用未来12个报告月的共识估计。</blockquote></p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p><blockquote>Verizion的远期自由现金流收益率为8.97%，比当前股息有4.34%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p><blockquote>雪佛龙股票的远期市盈率为24.8，高于标普500。话又说回来，预计2021年将是石油和天然气的复苏年，分析师的盈利预期可能没有赶上燃料大宗商品价格的上涨。雪佛龙的股息收益率为5.54%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.99%，还有2.45%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><blockquote>这并不是说巴菲特过度关注高股息收益率的股票。他不是。在该公司2月16日披露的公开交易持股中，有很多公司不支付股息，包括亚马逊公司（AMZN）、百健公司（Biogen Inc.BIIB）、Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand通用汽车公司（General Motors Co.GM），后者暂停了季度股息。四月。</blockquote></p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p><blockquote><b>巴菲特股息股票屏幕</b></blockquote></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><blockquote>根据巴菲特选择的Verizon和Chevron并排除Berkshire Hathaway尚未持有的股票，以下是标普500中股息收益率至少为4.00%的22只股票，可获得2021年的自由现金流估计，并有净空指示。该列表按股息收益率排序。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p><blockquote>滚动表格查看所有数据，包括2021年和2020年的远期市盈率和总回报。</blockquote></p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p><blockquote>对于房地产投资信托基金来说，衡量股息支付能力的行业标准是运营资金，这是一个非公认会计准则数字，将折旧和摊销加回收益中，并减去出售财产的收益。因此，表中的“估计FCF收益率”栏中使用了远期FFO估计值。</blockquote></p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><p><blockquote>该名单不包括伯克希尔哈撒韦公司已持有的四只股票——威瑞森、雪佛龙和另外两只股票：</blockquote></p><p></p><p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>艾伯维公司ABBV的股息收益率为4.99%，远期自由现金流收益率为10.54%，净空为5.55%。</li><li>卡夫亨氏公司KHChas的股息收益率为4.52%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.59%，净空为3.06%。该公司于2019年2月将股息削减了三分之一以上。</li></ul>高股息收益率可能表明投资者对公司的业务前景或其长期维持股息的能力感到不满，尽管自由现金流收益率很高。例如，榜单上收益率最高的股票是Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN，该公司在9月份更名之前是CenturyLink。股息率为8.48%。CenturyLink在2013年2月授权20亿美元股票回购计划的同一天，将季度股息削减了26%。该公司的季度股息仍为每股54美分，直到2019年2月削减至目前的每股25美分。截至2月16日的五年里，Lumen/CenturyLink的股价在股息再投资后下跌了34%，而10年来股价下跌了38%。</blockquote></p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p><blockquote>名单上其他在过去10年中削减股息的公司包括Williams Cos.WMB、Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI、Vornado Realty TrustVNO和Simon Property Group Inc.SPG，后者在6月份将派息减少了38%。</blockquote></p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都强调了如果您在这里看到任何感兴趣的股票，请进行自己的研究以形成自己对公司长期前景的看法的重要性。</blockquote></p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p><p><blockquote>除了CenturyLink之外，上面列出的远期市盈率估值最低的股票是AT&amp;T Inc.T，股息收益率为7.18%，市盈率为9.2，其次是辉瑞Inc.PFE，收益率为4.50%，远期市盈率为10.3。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying<blockquote>沃伦·巴菲特可能考虑购买的22只额外股息股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-18 14:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p><blockquote><b>他的伯克希尔哈撒韦集团最近开始购买威瑞森和雪佛龙的股票——这两家公司的股息收益率都很有吸引力，并得到了预期现金流的良好支持。</b>沃伦·巴菲特对某只股票投下信任票并不意味着你应该追随这一潮流，但这位伯克希尔·哈撒韦公司首席执行官的长期业绩记录不言而喻。这个人知道如何发现便宜货。</blockquote></p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p><blockquote>下面是受巴菲特两只新精选股票启发的股票屏幕，这些股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，预计自由现金流将充分覆盖。</blockquote></p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p><blockquote>随着其他投资者的耳朵竖起来，巴菲特新投资头寸的消息可能会推高股价。此前，Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRK于2月16日晚披露已购买Verizon Communications Inc.VZ和Chevron Corp.CVX的股票，这两只股票具有有吸引力的股息收益率，其中一只与加权估值相比定价较低标普500指数SPX。</blockquote></p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股价在2月17日早盘交易中上涨3%，雪佛龙股价上涨3.5%。随着股息再投资，Verizon继2020年业绩持平后，截至2月16日，2021年股价下跌了7%。雪佛龙2月17日早些时候上涨1.5%，继2020年下跌26%后，2021年已上涨12%。随着投资者展望大流行后的生活，油价正在上涨。西德克萨斯中质原油从10月31日收盘到2月16日收盘上涨了68%，最终收于每桶60.05美元。</blockquote></p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>以下所有内容均基于2月16日的收盘价以及FactSet调查的分析师对未来12个月的一致预期。</blockquote></p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p><blockquote>Verizon股票的预期市盈率为10.7，而标普500的加权总预期市盈率为22.5。该股的股息率为4.64%。</blockquote></p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p><blockquote>衡量公司支付股息（并希望提高股息）能力的一种方法是查看其自由现金流，即计划资本支出后的剩余现金流。这笔钱可用于任何公司目的，包括扩张、股票回购或增加股息。我们可以通过将跟踪或估计的自由现金流除以当前股价来衡量公司的自由现金流收益率。由于2020年美国经济受到干扰，随后的所有自由现金流收益率均采用未来12个报告月的共识估计。</blockquote></p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p><blockquote>Verizion的远期自由现金流收益率为8.97%，比当前股息有4.34%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p><blockquote>雪佛龙股票的远期市盈率为24.8，高于标普500。话又说回来，预计2021年将是石油和天然气的复苏年，分析师的盈利预期可能没有赶上燃料大宗商品价格的上涨。雪佛龙的股息收益率为5.54%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.99%，还有2.45%的“净空”。</blockquote></p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><blockquote>这并不是说巴菲特过度关注高股息收益率的股票。他不是。在该公司2月16日披露的公开交易持股中，有很多公司不支付股息，包括亚马逊公司（AMZN）、百健公司（Biogen Inc.BIIB）、Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand通用汽车公司（General Motors Co.GM），后者暂停了季度股息。四月。</blockquote></p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p><blockquote><b>巴菲特股息股票屏幕</b></blockquote></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><blockquote>根据巴菲特选择的Verizon和Chevron并排除Berkshire Hathaway尚未持有的股票，以下是标普500中股息收益率至少为4.00%的22只股票，可获得2021年的自由现金流估计，并有净空指示。该列表按股息收益率排序。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p><blockquote>滚动表格查看所有数据，包括2021年和2020年的远期市盈率和总回报。</blockquote></p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p><blockquote>对于房地产投资信托基金来说，衡量股息支付能力的行业标准是运营资金，这是一个非公认会计准则数字，将折旧和摊销加回收益中，并减去出售财产的收益。因此，表中的“估计FCF收益率”栏中使用了远期FFO估计值。</blockquote></p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><p><blockquote>该名单不包括伯克希尔哈撒韦公司已持有的四只股票——威瑞森、雪佛龙和另外两只股票：</blockquote></p><p></p><p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>艾伯维公司ABBV的股息收益率为4.99%，远期自由现金流收益率为10.54%，净空为5.55%。</li><li>卡夫亨氏公司KHChas的股息收益率为4.52%，远期自由现金流收益率为7.59%，净空为3.06%。该公司于2019年2月将股息削减了三分之一以上。</li></ul>高股息收益率可能表明投资者对公司的业务前景或其长期维持股息的能力感到不满，尽管自由现金流收益率很高。例如，榜单上收益率最高的股票是Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN，该公司在9月份更名之前是CenturyLink。股息率为8.48%。CenturyLink在2013年2月授权20亿美元股票回购计划的同一天，将季度股息削减了26%。该公司的季度股息仍为每股54美分，直到2019年2月削减至目前的每股25美分。截至2月16日的五年里，Lumen/CenturyLink的股价在股息再投资后下跌了34%，而10年来股价下跌了38%。</blockquote></p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p><blockquote>名单上其他在过去10年中削减股息的公司包括Williams Cos.WMB、Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI、Vornado Realty TrustVNO和Simon Property Group Inc.SPG，后者在6月份将派息减少了38%。</blockquote></p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p><blockquote>所有这些都强调了如果您在这里看到任何感兴趣的股票，请进行自己的研究以形成自己对公司长期前景的看法的重要性。</blockquote></p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p><p><blockquote>除了CenturyLink之外，上面列出的远期市盈率估值最低的股票是AT&amp;T Inc.T，股息收益率为7.18%，市盈率为9.2，其次是辉瑞Inc.PFE，收益率为4.50%，远期市盈率为10.3。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IPG":"埃培智","IRM":"爱恩铁山","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔","REG":"Regency Centers Corp","AMCR":"AMCOR PLC","VNO":"沃那多房信","LUMN":"Lumen Technologies","PFE":"辉瑞","O":"Realty Income Corp","PSX":"Phillips 66","DOW":"陶氏化学","OKE":"欧尼克（万欧卡）","SLG":"SL Green Realty Corp","KMI":"金德尔摩根","IP":"国际纸业","BXP":"BXP Inc","SPG":"西蒙地产","MPC":"马拉松原油","WMB":"威廉姆斯","T":"At&T","FRT":"FRT信托"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124565484","content_text":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&P 500 IndexSPX.Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.A Buffett dividend stock screenWorking from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BXP":0.9,"FRT":0.9,"IRM":0.9,"OKE":0.9,"DOW":0.9,"MPC":0.9,"LUMN":0.9,"T":0.9,"IPG":0.9,"SPG":0.9,"REG":0.9,"PFE":0.9,"IP":0.9,"VNO":0.9,"O":0.9,"AMCR":0.9,"KMI":0.9,"WMB":0.9,"PSX":0.9,"SLG":0.9,"K":0.9,"LYB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2428,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}