STtee的个人主页 - 老虎社区

STtee

STtee

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

5关注

3粉丝

3主题

0勋章

2021-12-29

A company that truly proves It worth!!!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-22

Should we bet on this??[Sly]

Why Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote>

2021-12-22

Wohooo! Up we go!

Why Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote>

2021-12-21

A stock for visionaries!!!

Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>

2021-12-16

Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-15

Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-12-08

Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]

Why Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote>

2021-11-23

Long-term epic growth potential![龇牙]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-02

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-02

Great read! What a guy, inspiring.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-25

Another big win![得意]

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-29

Time to go up!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-15

Unknown potential

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-24

Awesome app and service in China!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-22

Good read!

Here Are Five Stocks Top Analysts Are Heavily Bullish On, Heading Into April<blockquote>以下是顶级分析师在四月份大力看好的五只股票</blockquote>

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573295814526662","uuid":"3573295814526662","gmtCreate":1610201791129,"gmtModify":1616425193541,"name":"STtee","pinyin":"sttee","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":5,"tweetSize":15,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":3,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-4","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"明星虎友","description":"加入老虎社区2000天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.07.05","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.01.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":"60.48%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":692014527,"gmtCreate":1640791302891,"gmtModify":1640791302975,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","listText":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","text":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692014527","repostId":"2195457559","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4009,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691344609,"gmtCreate":1640141707509,"gmtModify":1640141707614,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]&nbsp;","listText":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]&nbsp;","text":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691344609","repostId":"1161633992","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1161633992","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640139393,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1161633992?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161633992","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nShares of Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Alibaba</b>(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced&nbsp;turnaround plan&nbsp;will work or not.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>阿里巴巴-SW</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：BABA）股价从昨天的科技股抛售中反弹，周二上涨 6.89%，股市分析师争论该公司刚刚宣布的扭亏为盈计划是否可行。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Hong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports&nbsp;TheFly.com.</p><p><blockquote>香港投资银行里昂证券 (CLSA) 率先提出看涨论点，称阿里巴巴-SW股票近期每股低于 123 美元的价格“便宜”。据 TheFly.com 报道，里昂证券预测，随着中国消费者支出的增长、阿里巴巴-SW进一步拓展国际市场以及阿里巴巴自身技术的进步，这三个“战略引擎”将推动公司的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.</p><p><blockquote>在这三个“引擎”中，里昂证券最看重阿里巴巴的技术实力，称该公司“享有无与伦比的竞争优势和强大的技术领先地位”，特别是在基于云的计算方面，这将是阿里巴巴-SW股票的“下一个大增长支柱”。</blockquote></p><p> In its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>不过，英国股票经纪商Atlantic Equities在其看跌反驳中表示，它对阿里巴巴的淘宝和天猫子公司在短期内表现良好几乎没有信心。这位分析师同意阿里巴巴-SW股票看起来“便宜”，市盈率为 17.5 倍。尽管如此，《大西洋月刊》担心，阿里巴巴在改进给里昂证券留下深刻印象的技术方面的“积极”支出不一定会为阿里巴巴-SW带来回报。特别是，Atlantic 认为该公司对“AliCloud”的投资只是该股的“适度”催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> For today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.</p><p><blockquote>今天，投资者似乎正在接受里昂证券对大西洋股票的论点。</blockquote></p><p> Ultimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings&nbsp;<i>looks</i>&nbsp;like avalue price&nbsp;for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to&nbsp;S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence&nbsp;data), over the&nbsp;<i>next</i>&nbsp;five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.</p><p><blockquote>然而，最终，这场辩论将归结为增长。当然，17.5 倍收益<i>外观</i>比如评估阿里巴巴-SW股票的价格——但前提是该公司能够产生足够的增长来证明估值的合理性。虽然阿里巴巴-SW过去确实表现出了一些良好的增长（例如，根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，过去五年的盈利复合增长率为 30%），但在过去五年中<i>下一个</i>五年来，大多数分析师认为该公司的年盈利增长甚至没有达到 10%，而是不到 9%。</blockquote></p><p> If that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price&nbsp;will be short-lived.</p><p><blockquote>如果这是阿里巴巴-SW最终做的最好的事情，恐怕今天的股价反弹将是短暂的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-22 10:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Alibaba</b>(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced&nbsp;turnaround plan&nbsp;will work or not.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>阿里巴巴-SW</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：BABA）股价从昨天的科技股抛售中反弹，周二上涨 6.89%，股市分析师争论该公司刚刚宣布的扭亏为盈计划是否可行。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Hong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports&nbsp;TheFly.com.</p><p><blockquote>香港投资银行里昂证券 (CLSA) 率先提出看涨论点，称阿里巴巴-SW股票近期每股低于 123 美元的价格“便宜”。据 TheFly.com 报道，里昂证券预测，随着中国消费者支出的增长、阿里巴巴-SW进一步拓展国际市场以及阿里巴巴自身技术的进步，这三个“战略引擎”将推动公司的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.</p><p><blockquote>在这三个“引擎”中，里昂证券最看重阿里巴巴的技术实力，称该公司“享有无与伦比的竞争优势和强大的技术领先地位”，特别是在基于云的计算方面，这将是阿里巴巴-SW股票的“下一个大增长支柱”。</blockquote></p><p> In its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>不过，英国股票经纪商Atlantic Equities在其看跌反驳中表示，它对阿里巴巴的淘宝和天猫子公司在短期内表现良好几乎没有信心。这位分析师同意阿里巴巴-SW股票看起来“便宜”，市盈率为 17.5 倍。尽管如此，《大西洋月刊》担心，阿里巴巴在改进给里昂证券留下深刻印象的技术方面的“积极”支出不一定会为阿里巴巴-SW带来回报。特别是，Atlantic 认为该公司对“AliCloud”的投资只是该股的“适度”催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> For today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.</p><p><blockquote>今天，投资者似乎正在接受里昂证券对大西洋股票的论点。</blockquote></p><p> Ultimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings&nbsp;<i>looks</i>&nbsp;like avalue price&nbsp;for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to&nbsp;S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence&nbsp;data), over the&nbsp;<i>next</i>&nbsp;five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.</p><p><blockquote>然而，最终，这场辩论将归结为增长。当然，17.5 倍收益<i>外观</i>比如评估阿里巴巴-SW股票的价格——但前提是该公司能够产生足够的增长来证明估值的合理性。虽然阿里巴巴-SW过去确实表现出了一些良好的增长（例如，根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，过去五年的盈利复合增长率为 30%），但在过去五年中<i>下一个</i>五年来，大多数分析师认为该公司的年盈利增长甚至没有达到 10%，而是不到 9%。</blockquote></p><p> If that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price&nbsp;will be short-lived.</p><p><blockquote>如果这是阿里巴巴-SW最终做的最好的事情，恐怕今天的股价反弹将是短暂的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-alibaba-stock-popped-65-today/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-alibaba-stock-popped-65-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161633992","content_text":"What happened\nShares of Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced turnaround plan will work or not.\nSo what\nHong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports TheFly.com.\nOf these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.\nIn its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.\nNow what\nFor today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.\nUltimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings looks like avalue price for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data), over the next five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.\nIf that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price will be short-lived.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"09988":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3013,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691349294,"gmtCreate":1640141061438,"gmtModify":1640141061505,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wohooo! Up we go!","listText":"Wohooo! Up we go!","text":"Wohooo! Up we go!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691349294","repostId":"1122685744","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1122685744","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640139942,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1122685744?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 10:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122685744","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nShares of Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.\nThe stock's gain wa","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>特斯拉</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）周二上涨，今日上涨4.29%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;like Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>该股的上涨可能主要是由整体市场乐观的一天推动的，尤其是特斯拉等成长型股票。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Capturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>&nbsp;was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.</p><p><blockquote>周二，整个市场充满乐观情绪，<b>标普500</b>今天上涨1.78%。科技密集型<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>然而，上涨了 2.4%。特斯拉等许多成长型股票上涨了几个百分点或更多，其中一些股票从本月早些时候的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票今天的上涨代表了从最近的大幅抛售中的一点反弹。即使算上今天的涨幅，该股也已从几个月前超过 1,243 美元的高点下跌了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> As the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's&nbsp;fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries&nbsp;to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着年底的结束，特斯拉投资者可以期待该公司第四季度的汽车交付量。尽管特斯拉运营所处的全球供应链和物流环境充满挑战，因此很难预测本季度的业绩，但分析师预计在此期间的交付量将创纪录。但是各种各样的结果都是可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第三季度交付汽车241,391辆，同比增长73%。对于本季度，分析师普遍预计交付量为 260,000 辆或更多。这将使今年的总交付量超过 887,000 辆，远高于该公司 2020 年交付的 500,000 辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.</p><p><blockquote>该公司通常在每个季度结束后的三个日历日内发布季度交付情况，或者特斯拉第四季度的 1 月 1 日至 1 月 3 日左右发布季度交付情况。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-22 10:25</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>特斯拉</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）周二上涨，今日上涨4.29%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;like Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>该股的上涨可能主要是由整体市场乐观的一天推动的，尤其是特斯拉等成长型股票。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Capturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>&nbsp;was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.</p><p><blockquote>周二，整个市场充满乐观情绪，<b>标普500</b>今天上涨1.78%。科技密集型<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>然而，上涨了 2.4%。特斯拉等许多成长型股票上涨了几个百分点或更多，其中一些股票从本月早些时候的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票今天的上涨代表了从最近的大幅抛售中的一点反弹。即使算上今天的涨幅，该股也已从几个月前超过 1,243 美元的高点下跌了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> As the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's&nbsp;fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries&nbsp;to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着年底的结束，特斯拉投资者可以期待该公司第四季度的汽车交付量。尽管特斯拉运营所处的全球供应链和物流环境充满挑战，因此很难预测本季度的业绩，但分析师预计在此期间的交付量将创纪录。但是各种各样的结果都是可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第三季度交付汽车241,391辆，同比增长73%。对于本季度，分析师普遍预计交付量为 260,000 辆或更多。这将使今年的总交付量超过 887,000 辆，远高于该公司 2020 年交付的 500,000 辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.</p><p><blockquote>该公司通常在每个季度结束后的三个日历日内发布季度交付情况，或者特斯拉第四季度的 1 月 1 日至 1 月 3 日左右发布季度交付情况。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-tesla-stock-jumped-on-tuesday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-tesla-stock-jumped-on-tuesday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122685744","content_text":"What happened\nShares of Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.\nThe stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for growth stocks like Tesla.\nSo what\nCapturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the S&P 500 was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.\nTesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.\nNow what\nAs the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.\nTesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.\nThe company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2943,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":693450974,"gmtCreate":1640067596223,"gmtModify":1640067596292,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"A stock for visionaries!!!","listText":"A stock for visionaries!!!","text":"A stock for visionaries!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693450974","repostId":"1117226796","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117226796","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640057164,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1117226796?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117226796","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东摊薄</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2. 依赖政府合同</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3. 面临利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-21 11:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东摊薄</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2. 依赖政府合同</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3. 面临利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117226796","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.\n\nspxChrome/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nPalantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.\n3 Issues Brought Up By Bears\nPalantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:\n1. Shareholder Dilution\nGrowth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:\nData by YCharts\nThanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):\nData by YCharts\nMassive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:\nSource: Palantir Press Release\nCompared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was 1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.\n2. Reliance on government contracts\nIn a recent bearish article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:\nSource: Palantir Technologies presentation\nIn fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With\nWith the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.\nThe claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.\n3. Exposure to rising rates\nMassive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.\nThis being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.\nWhy Palantir Is Still Attractive\nBears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.\nPalantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased Foundry for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.\nTakeaway\nIn general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690100203,"gmtCreate":1639644876042,"gmtModify":1639644876153,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690100203","repostId":"1139961481","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2694,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607210130,"gmtCreate":1639544139268,"gmtModify":1639544139268,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","listText":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","text":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607210130","repostId":"2191995516","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602062871,"gmtCreate":1638942528772,"gmtModify":1638942528772,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602062871","repostId":"1104681278","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104681278","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638934003,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1104681278?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-08 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104681278","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nAmid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many growth stocks are seeing ou","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Amid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:</p><p><blockquote>在周二整体市场乐观的一天中，许多成长型股票都出现了大幅上涨。举例来说，以下是周二四只成长型股票的峰值涨幅：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>CrowdStrike Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.</li>  <li><b>Pinterest</b>(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.</li>  <li><b>Salesforce.com</b>(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.</li>  <li><b>Sea Limited</b>(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.</li> </ul> While these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>CrowdStrike控股</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：CRWD）：6.9%。</li><li><b>Pinterest</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）：5.3%。</li><li><b>销售力量网站</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：CRM）：4.4%。</li><li><b>海有限公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SE）：6.7%。</li></ul>虽然这是截至美国东部时间周二下午 1:45 的最高涨幅，截至撰写本文时，这四只股票分别上涨了 5.4%、3.3%、3.5% 和 2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> These stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from&nbsp;a sharp sell-off last week.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票上涨之际，许多成长型股票正在从上周的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> News last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.</p><p><blockquote>上周美联储可能比预期更早开始加息并缩减资产购买计划的消息，以及有关新型冠状病毒变种的报道，令投资者感到恐慌。成长型股票受到的打击尤其严重，因为投资者希望减少对这些增长较快的公司的投资，这些公司的定价是基于未来几年的预期自由现金流水平。</blockquote></p><p> But investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者似乎正在改变对成长型股票吸引力的看法。这种对其前景的重新评估可能是由奥密克戎变种可能比以前的菌株更温和的报道引发的。这可能会使经济反弹和全球供应链改善更有可能，从而为资本主义创造一个良好的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> There are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.</p><p><blockquote>当然，仍然存在奥密克戎变种构成比预期更大的威胁的风险。例如，也有报道称，该病毒的传播速度可能比以前的毒株更快。此外，当美联储真正开始缩减规模计划时，看看市场会有什么反应将会很有趣。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>当然，投资者应该着眼长远。虽然加息值得注意，但可能是温和的。也就是说，市场仍将处于低利率环境。CrowdStrike、Pinterest、Salesforce 和 Sea Limited 等公司也不太可能受到适度和逐步加息的重大影响。当然，他们的股价可能会在短期内受到打击。但他们的基础业务拥有强大的催化剂，这些催化剂可能会在不断变化的利率环境中持续存在。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.</p><p><blockquote>最后，市场总是有可能已经消化了美联储最终加息的举动。毕竟，许多成长型股票最近大幅下跌——甚至包括今天的上涨。事实上，这四家公司的股票都跑输了<b>标普500</b>过去三个月，CrowdStrike、Sea Limited 和Pinterest的跌幅尤其严重。在此期间，这三只股票分别下跌了 26%、28% 和 31%。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>无论短期内发生什么，投资者都应继续关注这些成长型股票的基础业务以及他们对其估值相对于其长期潜力是否具有吸引力的分析。从长远来看，这些可能是这些股票表现的决定因素，而不是日常市场头条新闻和近期利率变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-08 11:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Amid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:</p><p><blockquote>在周二整体市场乐观的一天中，许多成长型股票都出现了大幅上涨。举例来说，以下是周二四只成长型股票的峰值涨幅：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>CrowdStrike Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.</li>  <li><b>Pinterest</b>(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.</li>  <li><b>Salesforce.com</b>(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.</li>  <li><b>Sea Limited</b>(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.</li> </ul> While these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>CrowdStrike控股</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：CRWD）：6.9%。</li><li><b>Pinterest</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）：5.3%。</li><li><b>销售力量网站</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：CRM）：4.4%。</li><li><b>海有限公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SE）：6.7%。</li></ul>虽然这是截至美国东部时间周二下午 1:45 的最高涨幅，截至撰写本文时，这四只股票分别上涨了 5.4%、3.3%、3.5% 和 2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> These stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from&nbsp;a sharp sell-off last week.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票上涨之际，许多成长型股票正在从上周的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> News last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.</p><p><blockquote>上周美联储可能比预期更早开始加息并缩减资产购买计划的消息，以及有关新型冠状病毒变种的报道，令投资者感到恐慌。成长型股票受到的打击尤其严重，因为投资者希望减少对这些增长较快的公司的投资，这些公司的定价是基于未来几年的预期自由现金流水平。</blockquote></p><p> But investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者似乎正在改变对成长型股票吸引力的看法。这种对其前景的重新评估可能是由奥密克戎变种可能比以前的菌株更温和的报道引发的。这可能会使经济反弹和全球供应链改善更有可能，从而为资本主义创造一个良好的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> There are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.</p><p><blockquote>当然，仍然存在奥密克戎变种构成比预期更大的威胁的风险。例如，也有报道称，该病毒的传播速度可能比以前的毒株更快。此外，当美联储真正开始缩减规模计划时，看看市场会有什么反应将会很有趣。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>当然，投资者应该着眼长远。虽然加息值得注意，但可能是温和的。也就是说，市场仍将处于低利率环境。CrowdStrike、Pinterest、Salesforce 和 Sea Limited 等公司也不太可能受到适度和逐步加息的重大影响。当然，他们的股价可能会在短期内受到打击。但他们的基础业务拥有强大的催化剂，这些催化剂可能会在不断变化的利率环境中持续存在。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.</p><p><blockquote>最后，市场总是有可能已经消化了美联储最终加息的举动。毕竟，许多成长型股票最近大幅下跌——甚至包括今天的上涨。事实上，这四家公司的股票都跑输了<b>标普500</b>过去三个月，CrowdStrike、Sea Limited 和Pinterest的跌幅尤其严重。在此期间，这三只股票分别下跌了 26%、28% 和 31%。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>无论短期内发生什么，投资者都应继续关注这些成长型股票的基础业务以及他们对其估值相对于其长期潜力是否具有吸引力的分析。从长远来看，这些可能是这些股票表现的决定因素，而不是日常市场头条新闻和近期利率变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/07/why-sea-limited-crowdstrike-pinterest-and-salesfor/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","CRM":"赛富时"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/07/why-sea-limited-crowdstrike-pinterest-and-salesfor/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104681278","content_text":"What happened\nAmid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many growth stocks are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:\n\nCrowdStrike Holdings(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.\nPinterest(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.\nSalesforce.com(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.\nSea Limited(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.\n\nWhile these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.\nThese stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from a sharp sell-off last week.\nSo what\nNews last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.\nBut investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.\nNow what\nThere are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.\nOf course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.\nFinally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the S&P 500over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.\nWhatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9,"CRWD":0.9,"CRM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3521,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":875616710,"gmtCreate":1637642004185,"gmtModify":1637642004185,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Long-term epic growth&nbsp;potential![龇牙]&nbsp;","listText":"Long-term epic growth&nbsp;potential![龇牙]&nbsp;","text":"Long-term epic growth potential![龇牙]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875616710","repostId":"1107351089","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":843463562,"gmtCreate":1635851118546,"gmtModify":1635851127555,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843463562","repostId":"1167795347","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":843463335,"gmtCreate":1635851094660,"gmtModify":1635851094660,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","listText":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","text":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843463335","repostId":"1167795347","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3247,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":856836163,"gmtCreate":1635168246766,"gmtModify":1635168246901,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Another big win![得意]&nbsp;","listText":"Another big win![得意]&nbsp;","text":"Another big win![得意]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/856836163","repostId":"1170172398","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":808946410,"gmtCreate":1627553484530,"gmtModify":1631885102595,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Time to go up!","listText":"Time to go up!","text":"Time to go up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/808946410","repostId":"1108176649","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347883087,"gmtCreate":1618484256849,"gmtModify":1634292635442,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Unknown potential","listText":"Unknown potential","text":"Unknown potential","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/347883087","repostId":"1145468327","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":527,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351133181,"gmtCreate":1616573192943,"gmtModify":1634525139512,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Awesome app and service in China!","listText":"Awesome app and service in China!","text":"Awesome app and service in China!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/351133181","repostId":"1151427133","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":753,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359769875,"gmtCreate":1616424347097,"gmtModify":1634525882883,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Good read!","listText":"Good read!","text":"Good read!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/359769875","repostId":"1141741176","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141741176","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga Earnings","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1616411375,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1141741176?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-22 19:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Are Five Stocks Top Analysts Are Heavily Bullish On, Heading Into April<blockquote>以下是顶级分析师在四月份大力看好的五只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141741176","media":"Benzinga Earnings","summary":"Despitein flation fears as the economy reopens after a wider COVID-19 vaccination rollout, there are","content":"<p>Despitein&nbsp;flation fears&nbsp;as the economy reopens after a wider COVID-19 vaccination rollout, there are stocks that analysts are highly bullish on. Here’s a list of best-performing Wall Street analysts’ top five stocks with “Buy” ratings, as&nbsp;compiled&nbsp;by TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote>尽管在更广泛的 COVID-19 疫苗接种后经济重新开放，存在通胀担忧，但分析师高度看好一些股票。以下是由 TipRanks 整理的华尔街分析师给予 “买入 ”评级的五只表现最佳的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Amazon Inc</b>: Baird analyst Colin Sebastian has reiterated a “Buy” rating and has a $4,000 price target in addition to a “Fresh Pick” status on the e-commerce giant. Colin has&nbsp;support from&nbsp;30 other top analysts who have a “Buy” rating as well, as per TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote><b>亚马逊公司</b>: 贝尔德分析师科林-塞巴斯蒂安（Colin Sebastian）重申了 “买入 ”评级，目标价为 4000 美元，此外还对这家电子商务巨头给予了 “新鲜选择 ”评级。根据 TipRanks 的数据，科林得到了其他 30 位顶级分析师的支持，他们也给予了 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Sebastian noted that investors could be missing \"one of the most compelling subscription/quasi-subscription models within the Internet and Technology sectors,” adding that&nbsp;75% of Amazon’s revenue is recurring even as it keeps adding new subscribers effectively.</p><p><blockquote>塞巴斯蒂安指出，投资者可能会错过 “互联网和技术领域最引人注目的订阅/准订阅模式之一”，并补充说，尽管亚马逊不断有效地增加新用户，但其 75% 的收入都是经常性的。</blockquote></p><p> Baird sees Amazon as \"significantly undervalued\" and can see it headed to $5,000 per share in the medium-term.</p><p><blockquote>贝尔德认为亚马逊“被严重低估”，并预计中期内其股价将达到每股 5,000 美元。</blockquote></p><p> With a 75% success rate and 34.8% average return per rating, Sebastian is ranked 28 out of over 7,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote>Sebastian 的成功率为 75%，平均每次评级回报率为 34.8%，在 TipRanks 追踪的 7,000 多名分析师中排名第 28 位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Microsoft Corp</b>: Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained a “Buy” rating and a $300 price target on the stock as he sees cloud growth momentum building up for the company. The rest of the Wall Street analysts are bullish as well with a total of 23 “Buy” ratings on the stock.</p><p><blockquote><b>微软公司</b>: Wedbush 分析师丹尼尔-艾夫斯（Daniel Ives）维持该股 “买入 ”评级和 300 美元的目标价，因为他认为该公司的云计算增长势头正在增强。其他华尔街分析师也看好该股，共给予 23 个 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Ives estimates that cloud wars between Amazon and Microsoft to capture market share are going to intensify and global cloud spending could reach nearly $1 trillion over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯估计，亚马逊和微软之间为夺取市场份额而进行的云战争将会加剧，未来十年全球云支出可能达到近1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> The veteran analyst has&nbsp;predicted a shift in tide&nbsp;in the cloud space, with Microsoft standing to benefit.</p><p><blockquote>这位资深分析师预测云领域的潮流将会发生变化，微软将从中受益。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Alphatec Holdings</b>: Medical technology company focused on spinal surgeries has six “Buy” ratings from top analysts and a $19.7 average stock price forecast.&nbsp;H.C. Wainwright analyst Sean Lee, who claims a 75% success rate and 69.2% average return per rating, has maintained a “Buy” rating on the stock and raised the price target to $19 from $16.</p><p><blockquote><b>阿尔法泰克控股</b>: 这家专注于脊柱手术的医疗技术公司获得了六位顶级分析师的 “买入 ”评级，平均股价预测为 19.7 美元。H.C.Wainwright 分析师肖恩-李（Sean Lee）声称该股的成功率为 75%，每次评级的平均回报率为 69.2%，他维持对该股的 “买入 ”评级，并将目标价从 16 美元上调至 19 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Lee’s rating comes after the company’s fourth-quarter revenue registered a 36% year-over-year surge despite the ongoing COVID-19 headwinds. The analyst expects EOS imaging to be a key growth driver for the company, contributing about $127 million in additional revenues by 2025.</p><p><blockquote>李的评级是在该公司第四季度营收同比激增 36% 之后做出的。该分析师预计 EOS imaging 将成为该公司的关键增长动力，到 2025 年将贡献约 1.27 亿美元的额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Alphatec's recently-launched procedure for lateral surgeries that significantly shortens the surgery times could also be a major growth driver this year.</p><p><blockquote>Alphatec 最近推出的侧向外科手术程序可显着缩短手术时间，也可能成为今年的主要增长动力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addus Homecare Corp</b>: Brokerage RBC Capital analyst Frank Morgan, who has a 5-star rating on the stock, has reiterated a \"Buy\" rating and a price target of $136.</p><p><blockquote><b>阿杜斯家庭护理公司</b>: 券商加拿大皇家银行资本分析师弗兰克·摩根 (Frank Morgan) 对该股给予 5 星评级，重申了“买入”评级和 136 美元的目标价。</blockquote></p><p> The Texas-based home and healthcare company recently unveiled a new value plan to support closer coordination of care for patients as they are discharged from acute care hospitals into their homes or into post-acute facilities.</p><p><blockquote>这家总部位于德克萨斯州的家庭和医疗保健公司最近公布了一项新的价值计划，以支持在患者从急症护理医院出院回家或急症后机构时更密切地协调护理。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan believes the plan “positions Addus for a larger role in post-acute coordination with potential for longer-term shared savings.” The analyst is also encouraged by the recently passed COVID federal relief aid as “it provides a 10% boost to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage meant to bolster personal care services amid the pandemic.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根认为，该计划 “使 Addus 在急性后的协调中发挥更大的作用，并有可能实现长期的共享节约”。这位分析师还对最近通过的 COVID 联邦救济援助感到鼓舞，因为 “它将联邦医疗援助百分比提高了 10%，旨在加强大流行病期间的个人护理服务”。</blockquote></p><p> This increase gives a larger match than Morgan originally expected, with earlier versions of the bill mentioning a 7.35% rise.</p><p><blockquote>这一增幅比摩根最初预期的要大，该法案的早期版本提到增幅为 7.35%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Amyris Inc</b>: H.C. Wainwright analyst Amit Dayal is bullish on the stock and has significantly roasted its price target to $35 from $11 and reiterated the “Buy” rating as well.</p><p><blockquote><b>艾米里斯公司</b>：H.C。Wainwright 分析师 Amit Dayal 看好该股，并将目标价从 11 美元大幅上调至 35 美元，同时重申了 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Dayal, who has a 77% average per rating, along with three top analysts, has a similar view on the stock in the last two months. The average analyst price target comes in at $25.50.</p><p><blockquote>Dayal 和三位顶级分析师的平均评级为 77%，他们在过去两个月对该股也有类似的看法。分析师平均目标价为 25.50 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Dayal sees improving business fundamentals that support the company’s annual revenue growth outlook expectations of between 30% and 50% over the next few years. Also, its debt is set to land below $100 million by the end of the third quarter this year from $297 million at the beginning of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Dayal 认为，业务基本面的改善将支持公司未来几年年收入增长 30% 至 50% 的预期。此外，到今年第三季度末，其债务将从 2020 年初的 2.97 亿美元降至 1 亿美元以下。</blockquote></p><p> The brokerage says the company currently has 18 ingredients currently in development that could position the company to have more than 30 commercialized ingredients by the end of 2025. In addition, it has four new brand launches in 2021, is expanding its retail presence, and could benefit from acquisitions and distribution agreements in international markets including China and Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>该经纪公司表示，该公司目前有 18 种成分正在开发中，到 2025 年底，该公司将拥有 30 多种商业化成分。此外，该公司在 2021 年推出了四个新品牌，正在扩大其零售业务，并可能受益于中国和巴西等国际市场的收购和分销协议。</blockquote></p><p> Based on all of the above, the analyst argues that revenues will grow at a nine-year CAGR from 2021 to 2030 of 28.8%, versus the previous 20.4% estimate.</p><p><blockquote>基于以上所有因素，分析师认为，2021 年至 2030 年的九年复合年增长率将为 28.8%，而之前的估计为 20.4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Are Five Stocks Top Analysts Are Heavily Bullish On, Heading Into April<blockquote>以下是顶级分析师在四月份大力看好的五只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Are Five Stocks Top Analysts Are Heavily Bullish On, Heading Into April<blockquote>以下是顶级分析师在四月份大力看好的五只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga Earnings </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-22 19:09</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Despitein&nbsp;flation fears&nbsp;as the economy reopens after a wider COVID-19 vaccination rollout, there are stocks that analysts are highly bullish on. Here’s a list of best-performing Wall Street analysts’ top five stocks with “Buy” ratings, as&nbsp;compiled&nbsp;by TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote>尽管在更广泛的 COVID-19 疫苗接种后经济重新开放，存在通胀担忧，但分析师高度看好一些股票。以下是由 TipRanks 整理的华尔街分析师给予 “买入 ”评级的五只表现最佳的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Amazon Inc</b>: Baird analyst Colin Sebastian has reiterated a “Buy” rating and has a $4,000 price target in addition to a “Fresh Pick” status on the e-commerce giant. Colin has&nbsp;support from&nbsp;30 other top analysts who have a “Buy” rating as well, as per TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote><b>亚马逊公司</b>: 贝尔德分析师科林-塞巴斯蒂安（Colin Sebastian）重申了 “买入 ”评级，目标价为 4000 美元，此外还对这家电子商务巨头给予了 “新鲜选择 ”评级。根据 TipRanks 的数据，科林得到了其他 30 位顶级分析师的支持，他们也给予了 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Sebastian noted that investors could be missing \"one of the most compelling subscription/quasi-subscription models within the Internet and Technology sectors,” adding that&nbsp;75% of Amazon’s revenue is recurring even as it keeps adding new subscribers effectively.</p><p><blockquote>塞巴斯蒂安指出，投资者可能会错过 “互联网和技术领域最引人注目的订阅/准订阅模式之一”，并补充说，尽管亚马逊不断有效地增加新用户，但其 75% 的收入都是经常性的。</blockquote></p><p> Baird sees Amazon as \"significantly undervalued\" and can see it headed to $5,000 per share in the medium-term.</p><p><blockquote>贝尔德认为亚马逊“被严重低估”，并预计中期内其股价将达到每股 5,000 美元。</blockquote></p><p> With a 75% success rate and 34.8% average return per rating, Sebastian is ranked 28 out of over 7,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks.</p><p><blockquote>Sebastian 的成功率为 75%，平均每次评级回报率为 34.8%，在 TipRanks 追踪的 7,000 多名分析师中排名第 28 位。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Microsoft Corp</b>: Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained a “Buy” rating and a $300 price target on the stock as he sees cloud growth momentum building up for the company. The rest of the Wall Street analysts are bullish as well with a total of 23 “Buy” ratings on the stock.</p><p><blockquote><b>微软公司</b>: Wedbush 分析师丹尼尔-艾夫斯（Daniel Ives）维持该股 “买入 ”评级和 300 美元的目标价，因为他认为该公司的云计算增长势头正在增强。其他华尔街分析师也看好该股，共给予 23 个 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Ives estimates that cloud wars between Amazon and Microsoft to capture market share are going to intensify and global cloud spending could reach nearly $1 trillion over the next decade.</p><p><blockquote>艾夫斯估计，亚马逊和微软之间为夺取市场份额而进行的云战争将会加剧，未来十年全球云支出可能达到近1万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> The veteran analyst has&nbsp;predicted a shift in tide&nbsp;in the cloud space, with Microsoft standing to benefit.</p><p><blockquote>这位资深分析师预测云领域的潮流将会发生变化，微软将从中受益。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Alphatec Holdings</b>: Medical technology company focused on spinal surgeries has six “Buy” ratings from top analysts and a $19.7 average stock price forecast.&nbsp;H.C. Wainwright analyst Sean Lee, who claims a 75% success rate and 69.2% average return per rating, has maintained a “Buy” rating on the stock and raised the price target to $19 from $16.</p><p><blockquote><b>阿尔法泰克控股</b>: 这家专注于脊柱手术的医疗技术公司获得了六位顶级分析师的 “买入 ”评级，平均股价预测为 19.7 美元。H.C.Wainwright 分析师肖恩-李（Sean Lee）声称该股的成功率为 75%，每次评级的平均回报率为 69.2%，他维持对该股的 “买入 ”评级，并将目标价从 16 美元上调至 19 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Lee’s rating comes after the company’s fourth-quarter revenue registered a 36% year-over-year surge despite the ongoing COVID-19 headwinds. The analyst expects EOS imaging to be a key growth driver for the company, contributing about $127 million in additional revenues by 2025.</p><p><blockquote>李的评级是在该公司第四季度营收同比激增 36% 之后做出的。该分析师预计 EOS imaging 将成为该公司的关键增长动力，到 2025 年将贡献约 1.27 亿美元的额外收入。</blockquote></p><p> Alphatec's recently-launched procedure for lateral surgeries that significantly shortens the surgery times could also be a major growth driver this year.</p><p><blockquote>Alphatec 最近推出的侧向外科手术程序可显着缩短手术时间，也可能成为今年的主要增长动力。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Addus Homecare Corp</b>: Brokerage RBC Capital analyst Frank Morgan, who has a 5-star rating on the stock, has reiterated a \"Buy\" rating and a price target of $136.</p><p><blockquote><b>阿杜斯家庭护理公司</b>: 券商加拿大皇家银行资本分析师弗兰克·摩根 (Frank Morgan) 对该股给予 5 星评级，重申了“买入”评级和 136 美元的目标价。</blockquote></p><p> The Texas-based home and healthcare company recently unveiled a new value plan to support closer coordination of care for patients as they are discharged from acute care hospitals into their homes or into post-acute facilities.</p><p><blockquote>这家总部位于德克萨斯州的家庭和医疗保健公司最近公布了一项新的价值计划，以支持在患者从急症护理医院出院回家或急症后机构时更密切地协调护理。</blockquote></p><p> Morgan believes the plan “positions Addus for a larger role in post-acute coordination with potential for longer-term shared savings.” The analyst is also encouraged by the recently passed COVID federal relief aid as “it provides a 10% boost to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage meant to bolster personal care services amid the pandemic.”</p><p><blockquote>摩根认为，该计划 “使 Addus 在急性后的协调中发挥更大的作用，并有可能实现长期的共享节约”。这位分析师还对最近通过的 COVID 联邦救济援助感到鼓舞，因为 “它将联邦医疗援助百分比提高了 10%，旨在加强大流行病期间的个人护理服务”。</blockquote></p><p> This increase gives a larger match than Morgan originally expected, with earlier versions of the bill mentioning a 7.35% rise.</p><p><blockquote>这一增幅比摩根最初预期的要大，该法案的早期版本提到增幅为 7.35%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Amyris Inc</b>: H.C. Wainwright analyst Amit Dayal is bullish on the stock and has significantly roasted its price target to $35 from $11 and reiterated the “Buy” rating as well.</p><p><blockquote><b>艾米里斯公司</b>：H.C。Wainwright 分析师 Amit Dayal 看好该股，并将目标价从 11 美元大幅上调至 35 美元，同时重申了 “买入 ”评级。</blockquote></p><p> Dayal, who has a 77% average per rating, along with three top analysts, has a similar view on the stock in the last two months. The average analyst price target comes in at $25.50.</p><p><blockquote>Dayal 和三位顶级分析师的平均评级为 77%，他们在过去两个月对该股也有类似的看法。分析师平均目标价为 25.50 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Dayal sees improving business fundamentals that support the company’s annual revenue growth outlook expectations of between 30% and 50% over the next few years. Also, its debt is set to land below $100 million by the end of the third quarter this year from $297 million at the beginning of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>Dayal 认为，业务基本面的改善将支持公司未来几年年收入增长 30% 至 50% 的预期。此外，到今年第三季度末，其债务将从 2020 年初的 2.97 亿美元降至 1 亿美元以下。</blockquote></p><p> The brokerage says the company currently has 18 ingredients currently in development that could position the company to have more than 30 commercialized ingredients by the end of 2025. In addition, it has four new brand launches in 2021, is expanding its retail presence, and could benefit from acquisitions and distribution agreements in international markets including China and Brazil.</p><p><blockquote>该经纪公司表示，该公司目前有 18 种成分正在开发中，到 2025 年底，该公司将拥有 30 多种商业化成分。此外，该公司在 2021 年推出了四个新品牌，正在扩大其零售业务，并可能受益于中国和巴西等国际市场的收购和分销协议。</blockquote></p><p> Based on all of the above, the analyst argues that revenues will grow at a nine-year CAGR from 2021 to 2030 of 28.8%, versus the previous 20.4% estimate.</p><p><blockquote>基于以上所有因素，分析师认为，2021 年至 2030 年的九年复合年增长率将为 28.8%，而之前的估计为 20.4%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMRS":"阿米瑞斯","ADUS":"爱德斯","AMZN":"亚马逊","ATEC":"阿尔法泰克","MSFT":"微软"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141741176","content_text":"Despitein flation fears as the economy reopens after a wider COVID-19 vaccination rollout, there are stocks that analysts are highly bullish on. Here’s a list of best-performing Wall Street analysts’ top five stocks with “Buy” ratings, as compiled by TipRanks.\nAmazon Inc: Baird analyst Colin Sebastian has reiterated a “Buy” rating and has a $4,000 price target in addition to a “Fresh Pick” status on the e-commerce giant. Colin has support from 30 other top analysts who have a “Buy” rating as well, as per TipRanks.\nSebastian noted that investors could be missing \"one of the most compelling subscription/quasi-subscription models within the Internet and Technology sectors,” adding that 75% of Amazon’s revenue is recurring even as it keeps adding new subscribers effectively.\nBaird sees Amazon as \"significantly undervalued\" and can see it headed to $5,000 per share in the medium-term.\nWith a 75% success rate and 34.8% average return per rating, Sebastian is ranked 28 out of over 7,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks.\nMicrosoft Corp: Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives maintained a “Buy” rating and a $300 price target on the stock as he sees cloud growth momentum building up for the company. The rest of the Wall Street analysts are bullish as well with a total of 23 “Buy” ratings on the stock.\nIves estimates that cloud wars between Amazon and Microsoft to capture market share are going to intensify and global cloud spending could reach nearly $1 trillion over the next decade.\nThe veteran analyst has predicted a shift in tide in the cloud space, with Microsoft standing to benefit.\nAlphatec Holdings: Medical technology company focused on spinal surgeries has six “Buy” ratings from top analysts and a $19.7 average stock price forecast. H.C. Wainwright analyst Sean Lee, who claims a 75% success rate and 69.2% average return per rating, has maintained a “Buy” rating on the stock and raised the price target to $19 from $16.\nLee’s rating comes after the company’s fourth-quarter revenue registered a 36% year-over-year surge despite the ongoing COVID-19 headwinds. The analyst expects EOS imaging to be a key growth driver for the company, contributing about $127 million in additional revenues by 2025.\nAlphatec's recently-launched procedure for lateral surgeries that significantly shortens the surgery times could also be a major growth driver this year.\nAddus Homecare Corp: Brokerage RBC Capital analyst Frank Morgan, who has a 5-star rating on the stock, has reiterated a \"Buy\" rating and a price target of $136.\nThe Texas-based home and healthcare company recently unveiled a new value plan to support closer coordination of care for patients as they are discharged from acute care hospitals into their homes or into post-acute facilities.\nMorgan believes the plan “positions Addus for a larger role in post-acute coordination with potential for longer-term shared savings.” The analyst is also encouraged by the recently passed COVID federal relief aid as “it provides a 10% boost to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage meant to bolster personal care services amid the pandemic.”\nThis increase gives a larger match than Morgan originally expected, with earlier versions of the bill mentioning a 7.35% rise.\nAmyris Inc: H.C. Wainwright analyst Amit Dayal is bullish on the stock and has significantly roasted its price target to $35 from $11 and reiterated the “Buy” rating as well.\nDayal, who has a 77% average per rating, along with three top analysts, has a similar view on the stock in the last two months. The average analyst price target comes in at $25.50.\nDayal sees improving business fundamentals that support the company’s annual revenue growth outlook expectations of between 30% and 50% over the next few years. Also, its debt is set to land below $100 million by the end of the third quarter this year from $297 million at the beginning of 2020.\nThe brokerage says the company currently has 18 ingredients currently in development that could position the company to have more than 30 commercialized ingredients by the end of 2025. In addition, it has four new brand launches in 2021, is expanding its retail presence, and could benefit from acquisitions and distribution agreements in international markets including China and Brazil.\nBased on all of the above, the analyst argues that revenues will grow at a nine-year CAGR from 2021 to 2030 of 28.8%, versus the previous 20.4% estimate.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ATEC":0.9,"ADUS":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"AMRS":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":661,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":875616710,"gmtCreate":1637642004185,"gmtModify":1637642004185,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Long-term epic growth&nbsp;potential![龇牙]&nbsp;","listText":"Long-term epic growth&nbsp;potential![龇牙]&nbsp;","text":"Long-term epic growth potential![龇牙]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/875616710","repostId":"1107351089","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":692014527,"gmtCreate":1640791302891,"gmtModify":1640791302975,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","listText":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","text":"A company that truly proves It worth!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/692014527","repostId":"2195457559","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4009,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":843463335,"gmtCreate":1635851094660,"gmtModify":1635851094660,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","listText":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","text":"Great read! What a guy, inspiring.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/843463335","repostId":"1167795347","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3247,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":607210130,"gmtCreate":1639544139268,"gmtModify":1639544139268,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","listText":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","text":"Best long term stable investment!!! AAPL!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/607210130","repostId":"2191995516","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":602062871,"gmtCreate":1638942528772,"gmtModify":1638942528772,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"Time for these growth stocks to shine! 2022[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602062871","repostId":"1104681278","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104681278","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1638934003,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1104681278?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-08 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104681278","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nAmid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many growth stocks are seeing ou","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Amid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:</p><p><blockquote>在周二整体市场乐观的一天中，许多成长型股票都出现了大幅上涨。举例来说，以下是周二四只成长型股票的峰值涨幅：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>CrowdStrike Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.</li>  <li><b>Pinterest</b>(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.</li>  <li><b>Salesforce.com</b>(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.</li>  <li><b>Sea Limited</b>(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.</li> </ul> While these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>CrowdStrike控股</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：CRWD）：6.9%。</li><li><b>Pinterest</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）：5.3%。</li><li><b>销售力量网站</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：CRM）：4.4%。</li><li><b>海有限公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SE）：6.7%。</li></ul>虽然这是截至美国东部时间周二下午 1:45 的最高涨幅，截至撰写本文时，这四只股票分别上涨了 5.4%、3.3%、3.5% 和 2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> These stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from&nbsp;a sharp sell-off last week.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票上涨之际，许多成长型股票正在从上周的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> News last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.</p><p><blockquote>上周美联储可能比预期更早开始加息并缩减资产购买计划的消息，以及有关新型冠状病毒变种的报道，令投资者感到恐慌。成长型股票受到的打击尤其严重，因为投资者希望减少对这些增长较快的公司的投资，这些公司的定价是基于未来几年的预期自由现金流水平。</blockquote></p><p> But investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者似乎正在改变对成长型股票吸引力的看法。这种对其前景的重新评估可能是由奥密克戎变种可能比以前的菌株更温和的报道引发的。这可能会使经济反弹和全球供应链改善更有可能，从而为资本主义创造一个良好的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> There are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.</p><p><blockquote>当然，仍然存在奥密克戎变种构成比预期更大的威胁的风险。例如，也有报道称，该病毒的传播速度可能比以前的毒株更快。此外，当美联储真正开始缩减规模计划时，看看市场会有什么反应将会很有趣。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>当然，投资者应该着眼长远。虽然加息值得注意，但可能是温和的。也就是说，市场仍将处于低利率环境。CrowdStrike、Pinterest、Salesforce 和 Sea Limited 等公司也不太可能受到适度和逐步加息的重大影响。当然，他们的股价可能会在短期内受到打击。但他们的基础业务拥有强大的催化剂，这些催化剂可能会在不断变化的利率环境中持续存在。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.</p><p><blockquote>最后，市场总是有可能已经消化了美联储最终加息的举动。毕竟，许多成长型股票最近大幅下跌——甚至包括今天的上涨。事实上，这四家公司的股票都跑输了<b>标普500</b>过去三个月，CrowdStrike、Sea Limited 和Pinterest的跌幅尤其严重。在此期间，这三只股票分别下跌了 26%、28% 和 31%。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>无论短期内发生什么，投资者都应继续关注这些成长型股票的基础业务以及他们对其估值相对于其长期潜力是否具有吸引力的分析。从长远来看，这些可能是这些股票表现的决定因素，而不是日常市场头条新闻和近期利率变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Sea Limited, CrowdStrike, Pinterest, and Salesforce Stocks Jumped Today<blockquote>为什么 Sea Limited、CrowdStrike、Pinterest和 Salesforce 股票今天上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-08 11:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Amid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:</p><p><blockquote>在周二整体市场乐观的一天中，许多成长型股票都出现了大幅上涨。举例来说，以下是周二四只成长型股票的峰值涨幅：</blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li><b>CrowdStrike Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.</li>  <li><b>Pinterest</b>(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.</li>  <li><b>Salesforce.com</b>(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.</li>  <li><b>Sea Limited</b>(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.</li> </ul> While these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>CrowdStrike控股</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：CRWD）：6.9%。</li><li><b>Pinterest</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）：5.3%。</li><li><b>销售力量网站</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：CRM）：4.4%。</li><li><b>海有限公司</b>（纽约证券交易所代码：SE）：6.7%。</li></ul>虽然这是截至美国东部时间周二下午 1:45 的最高涨幅，截至撰写本文时，这四只股票分别上涨了 5.4%、3.3%、3.5% 和 2.3%。</blockquote></p><p> These stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from&nbsp;a sharp sell-off last week.</p><p><blockquote>这些股票上涨之际，许多成长型股票正在从上周的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> News last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.</p><p><blockquote>上周美联储可能比预期更早开始加息并缩减资产购买计划的消息，以及有关新型冠状病毒变种的报道，令投资者感到恐慌。成长型股票受到的打击尤其严重，因为投资者希望减少对这些增长较快的公司的投资，这些公司的定价是基于未来几年的预期自由现金流水平。</blockquote></p><p> But investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者似乎正在改变对成长型股票吸引力的看法。这种对其前景的重新评估可能是由奥密克戎变种可能比以前的菌株更温和的报道引发的。这可能会使经济反弹和全球供应链改善更有可能，从而为资本主义创造一个良好的环境。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> There are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.</p><p><blockquote>当然，仍然存在奥密克戎变种构成比预期更大的威胁的风险。例如，也有报道称，该病毒的传播速度可能比以前的毒株更快。此外，当美联储真正开始缩减规模计划时，看看市场会有什么反应将会很有趣。</blockquote></p><p> Of course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.</p><p><blockquote>当然，投资者应该着眼长远。虽然加息值得注意，但可能是温和的。也就是说，市场仍将处于低利率环境。CrowdStrike、Pinterest、Salesforce 和 Sea Limited 等公司也不太可能受到适度和逐步加息的重大影响。当然，他们的股价可能会在短期内受到打击。但他们的基础业务拥有强大的催化剂，这些催化剂可能会在不断变化的利率环境中持续存在。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.</p><p><blockquote>最后，市场总是有可能已经消化了美联储最终加息的举动。毕竟，许多成长型股票最近大幅下跌——甚至包括今天的上涨。事实上，这四家公司的股票都跑输了<b>标普500</b>过去三个月，CrowdStrike、Sea Limited 和Pinterest的跌幅尤其严重。在此期间，这三只股票分别下跌了 26%、28% 和 31%。</blockquote></p><p> Whatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.</p><p><blockquote>无论短期内发生什么，投资者都应继续关注这些成长型股票的基础业务以及他们对其估值相对于其长期潜力是否具有吸引力的分析。从长远来看，这些可能是这些股票表现的决定因素，而不是日常市场头条新闻和近期利率变化。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/07/why-sea-limited-crowdstrike-pinterest-and-salesfor/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","CRM":"赛富时"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/07/why-sea-limited-crowdstrike-pinterest-and-salesfor/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104681278","content_text":"What happened\nAmid an upbeat day for the overall market on Tuesday, many growth stocks are seeing outsize gains. To illustrate, here were the peak gains on Tuesday for four growth stocks:\n\nCrowdStrike Holdings(NASDAQ:CRWD): 6.9%.\nPinterest(NYSE:PINS): 5.3%.\nSalesforce.com(NYSE:CRM): 4.4%.\nSea Limited(NYSE:SE): 6.7%.\n\nWhile these were the highest the stocks rose on Tuesday as of 1:45 p.m. ET, the four stocks were up 5.4%, 3.3%, 3.5%, and 2.3%, respectively, as of this writing.\nThese stocks' gains come as many growth stocks are rebounding from a sharp sell-off last week.\nSo what\nNews last week that the Federal Reserve may begin raising interest rates and tapering its asset purchase program earlier than expected, as well as reports of a new coronavirus variant, spooked investors. Growth stocks were hit particularly hard as investors looked to reduce exposure to these faster-growing companies that are priced for expected free cash flow levels years into the future.\nBut investors seem to be changing their minds about the attractiveness of growth stocks. This reevaluation of their prospects is likely sparked by reports that the omicron variant may be milder than previous strains. This could make an economic rebound and global supply chain improvements more likely, potentially creating a good environment for capitalism.\nNow what\nThere are, of course, still risks that the omicron variant poses a greater threat than expected. For instance, there are also reports that the virus may spread faster than previous strains. Plus, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts when the Fed actually begins its tapering program.\nOf course, investors should keep the long term in perspective. While rate hikes are notable, they will likely be modest. In other words, the market will still be in a low interest rate environment. It's also unlikely that companies like CrowdStrike, Pinterest, Salesforce, and Sea Limited will actually be impacted materially by modest and gradual rate hikes. Sure, their stock prices could take hits in the short term. But their underlying businesses have powerful catalysts that will likely persist through an evolving interest rate environment.\nFinally, it's always possible that the market has already priced in the Fed's eventual move to raise interest rates. After all, many growth stocks have fallen sharply recently -- even including today's gain. In fact, all four of these companies' stocks have underperformed the S&P 500over the past three months, with CrowdStrike, Sea Limited, and Pinterest falling particularly hard. The three stocks are down 26%, 28%, and 31%, respectively, during this period.\nWhatever happens in the near term, investors should stay focused on these growth stocks' underlying business and their analysis of whether they believe their valuations are attractive relative to their long-term potential. Over the long haul, these will likely be the determinants of how well these stocks perform -- not day-to-day market headlines and near-term interest rate changes.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9,"CRWD":0.9,"CRM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3521,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":690100203,"gmtCreate":1639644876042,"gmtModify":1639644876153,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"Wow SPDR! Number 1[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/690100203","repostId":"1139961481","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2694,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":808946410,"gmtCreate":1627553484530,"gmtModify":1631885102595,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Time to go up!","listText":"Time to go up!","text":"Time to go up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/808946410","repostId":"1108176649","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":691349294,"gmtCreate":1640141061438,"gmtModify":1640141061505,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Wohooo! Up we go!","listText":"Wohooo! Up we go!","text":"Wohooo! Up we go!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691349294","repostId":"1122685744","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1122685744","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640139942,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1122685744?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 10:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122685744","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nShares of Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.\nThe stock's gain wa","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>特斯拉</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）周二上涨，今日上涨4.29%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;like Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>该股的上涨可能主要是由整体市场乐观的一天推动的，尤其是特斯拉等成长型股票。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Capturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>&nbsp;was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.</p><p><blockquote>周二，整个市场充满乐观情绪，<b>标普500</b>今天上涨1.78%。科技密集型<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>然而，上涨了 2.4%。特斯拉等许多成长型股票上涨了几个百分点或更多，其中一些股票从本月早些时候的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票今天的上涨代表了从最近的大幅抛售中的一点反弹。即使算上今天的涨幅，该股也已从几个月前超过 1,243 美元的高点下跌了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> As the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's&nbsp;fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries&nbsp;to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着年底的结束，特斯拉投资者可以期待该公司第四季度的汽车交付量。尽管特斯拉运营所处的全球供应链和物流环境充满挑战，因此很难预测本季度的业绩，但分析师预计在此期间的交付量将创纪录。但是各种各样的结果都是可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第三季度交付汽车241,391辆，同比增长73%。对于本季度，分析师普遍预计交付量为 260,000 辆或更多。这将使今年的总交付量超过 887,000 辆，远高于该公司 2020 年交付的 500,000 辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.</p><p><blockquote>该公司通常在每个季度结束后的三个日历日内发布季度交付情况，或者特斯拉第四季度的 1 月 1 日至 1 月 3 日左右发布季度交付情况。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Tesla Stock Jumped on Tuesday<blockquote>为什么特斯拉股价周二上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-22 10:25</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>特斯拉</b>（纳斯达克股票代码：TSLA）周二上涨，今日上涨4.29%。</blockquote></p><p> The stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for&nbsp;growth stocks&nbsp;like Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>该股的上涨可能主要是由整体市场乐观的一天推动的，尤其是特斯拉等成长型股票。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Capturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>&nbsp;was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.</p><p><blockquote>周二，整个市场充满乐观情绪，<b>标普500</b>今天上涨1.78%。科技密集型<b>纳斯达克复合材料</b>然而，上涨了 2.4%。特斯拉等许多成长型股票上涨了几个百分点或更多，其中一些股票从本月早些时候的大幅抛售中反弹。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票今天的上涨代表了从最近的大幅抛售中的一点反弹。即使算上今天的涨幅，该股也已从几个月前超过 1,243 美元的高点下跌了 25%。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> As the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's&nbsp;fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries&nbsp;to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.</p><p><blockquote>随着年底的结束，特斯拉投资者可以期待该公司第四季度的汽车交付量。尽管特斯拉运营所处的全球供应链和物流环境充满挑战，因此很难预测本季度的业绩，但分析师预计在此期间的交付量将创纪录。但是各种各样的结果都是可能的。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉第三季度交付汽车241,391辆，同比增长73%。对于本季度，分析师普遍预计交付量为 260,000 辆或更多。这将使今年的总交付量超过 887,000 辆，远高于该公司 2020 年交付的 500,000 辆汽车。</blockquote></p><p> The company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.</p><p><blockquote>该公司通常在每个季度结束后的三个日历日内发布季度交付情况，或者特斯拉第四季度的 1 月 1 日至 1 月 3 日左右发布季度交付情况。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-tesla-stock-jumped-on-tuesday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-tesla-stock-jumped-on-tuesday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122685744","content_text":"What happened\nShares of Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA)jumped on Tuesday, rising 4.29% today.\nThe stock's gain was likely primarily driven by an upbeat day in the overall market -- especially for growth stocks like Tesla.\nSo what\nCapturing optimism in the overall market on Tuesday, the S&P 500 was up 1.78% today. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite, however, was up 2.4%. Many growth stocks like Tesla were up several percentage points or more, rebounding some from a sharp sell-off earlier this month.\nTesla stock's gain today represents a bit of a rebound from a steep sell-off recently. Even including today's gain, the stock has slid 25% from a high of more than $1,243 just a few months ago.\nNow what\nAs the year wraps up, Tesla investors have the company's fourth-quarter vehicle deliveries to look forward to. While the challenging global supply chain and logistics environment that Tesla is operating in makes it difficult to forecast the quarter, analysts are expecting record deliveries during the period. But a wide range of outcomes are possible.\nTesla delivered 241,391 vehicles in its third quarter, representing 73% year-over-year growth. For the current quarter, analysts generally expect 260,000 or more deliveries. This would put total deliveries for the year at over 887,000 -- far higher than the 500,000 vehicles the company delivered in 2020.\nThe company usually posts its quarterly deliveries within three calendar days of each quarter's end, or somewhere around Jan. 1 to Jan. 3 for Tesla's Q4.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2943,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":691344609,"gmtCreate":1640141707509,"gmtModify":1640141707614,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]&nbsp;","listText":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]&nbsp;","text":"Should we bet on this??[Sly]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/691344609","repostId":"1161633992","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1161633992","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640139393,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1161633992?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-22 10:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161633992","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"What happened\nShares of Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining","content":"<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Alibaba</b>(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced&nbsp;turnaround plan&nbsp;will work or not.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>阿里巴巴-SW</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：BABA）股价从昨天的科技股抛售中反弹，周二上涨 6.89%，股市分析师争论该公司刚刚宣布的扭亏为盈计划是否可行。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Hong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports&nbsp;TheFly.com.</p><p><blockquote>香港投资银行里昂证券 (CLSA) 率先提出看涨论点，称阿里巴巴-SW股票近期每股低于 123 美元的价格“便宜”。据 TheFly.com 报道，里昂证券预测，随着中国消费者支出的增长、阿里巴巴-SW进一步拓展国际市场以及阿里巴巴自身技术的进步，这三个“战略引擎”将推动公司的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.</p><p><blockquote>在这三个“引擎”中，里昂证券最看重阿里巴巴的技术实力，称该公司“享有无与伦比的竞争优势和强大的技术领先地位”，特别是在基于云的计算方面，这将是阿里巴巴-SW股票的“下一个大增长支柱”。</blockquote></p><p> In its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>不过，英国股票经纪商Atlantic Equities在其看跌反驳中表示，它对阿里巴巴的淘宝和天猫子公司在短期内表现良好几乎没有信心。这位分析师同意阿里巴巴-SW股票看起来“便宜”，市盈率为 17.5 倍。尽管如此，《大西洋月刊》担心，阿里巴巴在改进给里昂证券留下深刻印象的技术方面的“积极”支出不一定会为阿里巴巴-SW带来回报。特别是，Atlantic 认为该公司对“AliCloud”的投资只是该股的“适度”催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> For today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.</p><p><blockquote>今天，投资者似乎正在接受里昂证券对大西洋股票的论点。</blockquote></p><p> Ultimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings&nbsp;<i>looks</i>&nbsp;like avalue price&nbsp;for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to&nbsp;S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence&nbsp;data), over the&nbsp;<i>next</i>&nbsp;five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.</p><p><blockquote>然而，最终，这场辩论将归结为增长。当然，17.5 倍收益<i>外观</i>比如评估阿里巴巴-SW股票的价格——但前提是该公司能够产生足够的增长来证明估值的合理性。虽然阿里巴巴-SW过去确实表现出了一些良好的增长（例如，根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，过去五年的盈利复合增长率为 30%），但在过去五年中<i>下一个</i>五年来，大多数分析师认为该公司的年盈利增长甚至没有达到 10%，而是不到 9%。</blockquote></p><p> If that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price&nbsp;will be short-lived.</p><p><blockquote>如果这是阿里巴巴-SW最终做的最好的事情，恐怕今天的股价反弹将是短暂的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Stock Popped over 6% Today?<blockquote>为什么阿里巴巴-SW股价今天上涨超过 6%？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-22 10:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>What happened</p><p><blockquote>发生了什么事</blockquote></p><p> Shares of&nbsp;<b>Alibaba</b>(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced&nbsp;turnaround plan&nbsp;will work or not.</p><p><blockquote>股份<b>阿里巴巴-SW</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：BABA）股价从昨天的科技股抛售中反弹，周二上涨 6.89%，股市分析师争论该公司刚刚宣布的扭亏为盈计划是否可行。</blockquote></p><p> So what</p><p><blockquote>那又怎样</blockquote></p><p> Hong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports&nbsp;TheFly.com.</p><p><blockquote>香港投资银行里昂证券 (CLSA) 率先提出看涨论点，称阿里巴巴-SW股票近期每股低于 123 美元的价格“便宜”。据 TheFly.com 报道，里昂证券预测，随着中国消费者支出的增长、阿里巴巴-SW进一步拓展国际市场以及阿里巴巴自身技术的进步，这三个“战略引擎”将推动公司的增长。</blockquote></p><p> Of these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.</p><p><blockquote>在这三个“引擎”中，里昂证券最看重阿里巴巴的技术实力，称该公司“享有无与伦比的竞争优势和强大的技术领先地位”，特别是在基于云的计算方面，这将是阿里巴巴-SW股票的“下一个大增长支柱”。</blockquote></p><p> In its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.</p><p><blockquote>不过，英国股票经纪商Atlantic Equities在其看跌反驳中表示，它对阿里巴巴的淘宝和天猫子公司在短期内表现良好几乎没有信心。这位分析师同意阿里巴巴-SW股票看起来“便宜”，市盈率为 17.5 倍。尽管如此，《大西洋月刊》担心，阿里巴巴在改进给里昂证券留下深刻印象的技术方面的“积极”支出不一定会为阿里巴巴-SW带来回报。特别是，Atlantic 认为该公司对“AliCloud”的投资只是该股的“适度”催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> Now what</p><p><blockquote>现在呢</blockquote></p><p> For today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.</p><p><blockquote>今天，投资者似乎正在接受里昂证券对大西洋股票的论点。</blockquote></p><p> Ultimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings&nbsp;<i>looks</i>&nbsp;like avalue price&nbsp;for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to&nbsp;S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence&nbsp;data), over the&nbsp;<i>next</i>&nbsp;five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.</p><p><blockquote>然而，最终，这场辩论将归结为增长。当然，17.5 倍收益<i>外观</i>比如评估阿里巴巴-SW股票的价格——但前提是该公司能够产生足够的增长来证明估值的合理性。虽然阿里巴巴-SW过去确实表现出了一些良好的增长（例如，根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，过去五年的盈利复合增长率为 30%），但在过去五年中<i>下一个</i>五年来，大多数分析师认为该公司的年盈利增长甚至没有达到 10%，而是不到 9%。</blockquote></p><p> If that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price&nbsp;will be short-lived.</p><p><blockquote>如果这是阿里巴巴-SW最终做的最好的事情，恐怕今天的股价反弹将是短暂的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-alibaba-stock-popped-65-today/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/21/why-alibaba-stock-popped-65-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161633992","content_text":"What happened\nShares of Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)stock bounced back from yesterday's tech sell-off, gaining 6.89% on Tuesday as stock market analysts debated whether the company's just-announced turnaround plan will work or not.\nSo what\nHong Kong-based investment bank CLSA led off with the bull argument, calling Alibaba stock \"cheap\" at its recent price under $123 a share. CLSA predicts that as Chinese consumer spending grows, as Alibaba expands further into international markets, and as Alibaba's own technology improves, these three \"strategic engines\" will propel the company's growth, reports TheFly.com.\nOf these three \"engines,\" CLSA places the greatest weight on Alibaba's technological prowess, saying the company \"enjoys unparalleled competitive advantages and a strong technological lead,\" in particular in cloud-based computing, which will be \"the next big growth pillar\" for Alibaba stock.\nIn its bearish rebuttal, though, U.K. stock broker Atlantic Equities says it has little confidence that Alibaba's Taobao and Tmall subsidiaries will perform well in the near term. The analyst agrees that Alibaba stock looks \"inexpensive\" at 17.5 times earnings. Still, Atlantic worries that Alibaba's \"aggressive\" spending on improving the technology that so impresses CLSA won't necessarily pay off for Alibaba. And in particular, Atlantic sees the company's investments in \"AliCloud\" as being only a \"modest\" catalyst for the stock.\nNow what\nFor today, it appears that investors are buying CLSA's argument over Atlantic Equities'.\nUltimately, though, this debate is going to come down to growth. Sure, 17.5 times earnings looks like avalue price for Alibaba stock -- but only if the company can produce enough growth to justify the valuation. While it's true that Alibaba has exhibited some fine growth in the past (a 30% compound rate of growth in earnings over the last five years for example, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data), over the next five years, most analysts don't see the company producing even 10% annual earnings growth -- but less than 9% instead.\nIf that's the best Alibaba ends up doing, I fear that today's rebound in stock price will be short-lived.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"09988":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3013,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":693450974,"gmtCreate":1640067596223,"gmtModify":1640067596292,"author":{"id":"3573295814526662","authorId":"3573295814526662","name":"STtee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8b6d27a66090fbddbc0ceedceb166a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573295814526662","authorIdStr":"3573295814526662"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"A stock for visionaries!!!","listText":"A stock for visionaries!!!","text":"A stock for visionaries!!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693450974","repostId":"1117226796","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117226796","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1640057164,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1117226796?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-21 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117226796","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东摊薄</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2. 依赖政府合同</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3. 面临利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: 3 Reasons Against It And Why It's Still A Buy<blockquote>Palantir：反对它的 3 个理由以及为什么它仍然值得购买</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-21 11:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Summary</b></p><p><blockquote><b>总结</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Palantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.</li>  <li>PLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.</li>  <li>Despite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.</li> </ul> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7230cdd890b86f9941b99b1503d04049\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1044\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>spxChrome/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p><blockquote><ul><li>Palantir Technologies 是一只战场股票。对于多头来说，听取空头的论点是个好主意。</li><li>PLTR稀释了其股东，但这不一定是一个大问题。</li><li>尽管存在一些利率阻力，但由于强大的护城河和良好的增长前景，PLTR 对我来说似乎是一项不错的投资。</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>spxChrome/E+ 来自盖蒂图片社</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>Article Thesis</b></p><p><blockquote><b>文章论文</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.</p><p><blockquote>Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 是一只陷入困境的成长型股票，最近几周，随着股价持续下跌，空头一直在获胜。确实有一些重要的看跌论点，例如稀释、对政府合同的依赖以及利率上升。然而，我仍然相信 Palantir Technologies 是一项有吸引力的长期投资，因为其技术可能会在未来许多年内带来巨大的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3 Issues Brought Up By Bears</b></p><p><blockquote><b>空头提出的3个问题</b></blockquote></p><p> Palantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:</p><p><blockquote>Palantir 是一只成长型股票，既有高度确信的多头，也有高度确信的空头。总的来说，我在这里是看涨的阵营，但看看空头的论点也是一个好主意。反对Palantir的三个最常见的论点如下：</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Shareholder Dilution</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.股东摊薄</b></blockquote></p><p> Growth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:</p><p><blockquote>全公司范围的增长很重要，但每股增长更重要。有许多例子表明，公司股票数量的变化可以创造或摧毁很多股东价值。例如，苹果 (AAPL) 的净利润在过去十年中增长了约 190%：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b5263c8346cfbbb898f1d1ac9a5bead\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Thanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):</p><p><blockquote>然而，由于股票数量减少，其每股收益增长了 350%，更具吸引力，但回购创造了大量股东价值。也有一些例子表明，股票数量的增加摧毁了很多股东的价值，例如花旗集团 (C)：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc39008812f5e2d0082dedc95b025c68\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>数据由YCharts提供</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Massive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:</p><p><blockquote>大衰退期间的大规模股票发行导致自 2007 年以来每股收益下降了 75%，尽管同期净利润有所增长。因此，查看公司股票数量的变化是有意义的，因为这些变化从长远来看会产生很大的影响。在 Palantir，我们看到自公司上市以来，股票数量一直在大幅增加。在最近一个季度，Palantir 的股票数量如下：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/917ca4d7a390ced61d7c92d528f84fc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"539\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Press Release</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 新闻稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Compared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was&nbsp;1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.</p><p><blockquote>与第二季度相比，Palantir 的平均股数为 18.95 亿股，季度增长 3.5%，年增长率约为十几岁左右。当然，这一点根本不容忽视，当他们声称股东正在以有意义的速度被稀释时，值得争论。另一方面，Palantir 的业务增长率远高于每季度 3%，因为该公司预计今年的收入增长约为 40%，而且 Palantir 在未来几年也应该实现巨大的业务增长。即使Palantir的股票数量未来每年增长10%-15%，由于PLTR的快速增长，每股收入仍将每年增长25%以上。我还相信，随着时间的推移，稀释程度将会下降。不仅亚马逊（AMZN）、Alphabet（GOOG）或Meta（FB）等许多其他成长型公司都是如此，而且从期权奖励的角度来看，这也是合乎逻辑的。当一家公司尚未公开交易且其未来仍然更加不确定时，期权奖励尤其丰厚，但随着公司的成熟，随着公司风险的降低，员工会更加放心，他们不再需要大量的期权包。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，Palantir 还产生了强劲的自由现金流，这将使公司能够在未来进行股票回购，这也将有助于提高稀释率。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Reliance on government contracts</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2. 依赖政府合同</b></blockquote></p><p></p><p> In a recent bearish&nbsp;article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:</p><p><blockquote>在最近一篇悲观的文章中，Seeking Alpha 撰稿人 On The Pulse 认为 Palantir 被高估了，其对政府合同的依赖是一个问题。事实上，Palantir Technologies 如今在很大程度上依赖政府合同，但我不认为这是一个主要问题。首先，由于其商业业务的大规模增长，Palantir 最近已经摆脱了政府合同的多元化：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de23409915ee3811691b986a42ece899\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"308\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Palantir Technologies presentation</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>资料来源：Palantir 技术演示文稿</span></p></blockquote></p><p> In fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With</p><p><blockquote>事实上，Palantir 的商业业务近年来的增长速度远远快于其政府业务，这表明来自各行各业的商业客户显然都看到了 Palantir 技术的巨大价值——否则，他们就不会快速购买。和</blockquote></p><p> With the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.</p><p><blockquote>随着商业业务增长率超过政府业务增长率，多年来，Palantir将成为一家越来越少依赖政府合同的公司，并最终转变为一家专注于B2B的软件/技术公司。即使 Palantir 永远是一家以政府为中心的公司（根据各个业务部门目前的增长率，这似乎不太可能），但这不一定是一个问题。为政府工作意味着交易对手风险很小，现有的关系可以很容易地用来获得未来的合同。最后但并非最不重要的一点是，随着政府预算相对稳步增长，良好的政府关系带来了相当大的增长机会——特别是在Palantir活跃的国防技术/安全技术领域，因为该领域有巨大的进一步投资需求。</blockquote></p><p> The claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actually<i>declined</i>year-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，政府关注导致缺乏可扩展性的说法也是错误的。根据 Palantir 最新的季度报告（上文链接），其运营费用在 2020 年第三季度至 2021 年第三季度期间增加了 900 万美元，而同期收入增加了 1.03 亿美元。这支持了基于股份的薪酬的变化。如果包括这些 SBC 费用，Palantir 的费用实际上<i>拒绝</i>同比增长，而该公司的收入增长了近 40%。因此，我认为，Palantir 多年来不会产生任何规模优势的说法似乎是没有根据的。相反，数据表明 Palantir 将能够大幅提高利润率——该公司调整后毛利润大幅增长 9000 万美元，而调整后运营费用仅增长 900 万美元——从而实现了出色的运营杠杆。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Exposure to rising rates</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3. 面临利率上升的风险</b></blockquote></p><p> Massive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.</p><p><blockquote>大规模通胀将迫使美联储在 2022 年及以后加息，这可能是成长型股票的一个问题。与增长缓慢或没有增长但在短期内产生大量未来利润的公司相比，今天不盈利或绝大多数利润的公司更容易受到贴现率上升的影响。我相信，这可能会导致未来几年价值股的表现优于成长型股。Palantir 尚未盈利，自然属于“增长”类别，利率上升可能会产生高于平均水平的影响。我相信，这里没有真正的反驳论点——在其他条件相同的情况下，与艾伯维 (ABBV) 等价值股相比，利率上升对 Palantir 的影响确实会更大。</blockquote></p><p> This being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.</p><p><blockquote>然而，这对 Palantir 来说是一个渐进的负面影响，并不意味着在任何情况下都必须避免购买股票。事实上，尽管利率上升可能带来一些潜在的不利因素，但如果其他论点具有更大的分量，Palantir 仍然可能是一项有吸引力的投资——我相信这是真的，因为我看到 PLTR 的巨大增长潜力和巨大护城河超过了利率上升带来的一些近期不利因素。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Why Palantir Is Still Attractive</b></p><p><blockquote><b>为什么 Palantir 仍然有吸引力</b></blockquote></p><p> Bears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.</p><p><blockquote>空头提出了一系列反对 Palantir 的论点，如上所述，这些论点可能有道理。我相信它们在某些情况下可能被夸大了，但看看熊的论点不会有什么坏处——事实上，为了做出更明智的决定，看看双方似乎是个好主意。稀释确实是一个问题，尽管我不认为这会是一个太大的阻力，因为 PLTR 的业务增长很容易超过稀释，而且总体而言，稀释应该会在未来几年放缓。由于高于平均水平的商业业务增长率，对政府的依赖将随着时间的推移而减弱，总的来说，与政府做生意无论如何都不是一件坏事。从我在PLTR的数据中看到的情况来看，PLTR缺乏可扩展性的说法似乎是错误的。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Palantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased&nbsp;Foundry&nbsp;for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an&nbsp;excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.</p><p><blockquote>尽管存在这些争论，我相信 Palantir 仍然很有吸引力：该公司发展迅速，在政府业务和商业方面都具有数十年的增长潜力，而且 Palantir 似乎拥有非常宽阔的护城河。这种合并最终可能会使 Palantir 成为最大、最重要的公司之一——尽管投资者不应指望这种情况在短期内发生。相反，我相信，随着我们的世界变得越来越渴望数据，Palantir 很有可能在 2020 年代及以后以相当大的速度增长——政府和企业都将试图从所有这些数据中获得最大价值，而 Palantir 凭借其量身定制的解决方案将为客户提供这种价值。凭借最近展示的 Foundry for crypto 等新工具，Palantir 处于各种新兴技术的前沿。由于 Palantir 可以接触到顶尖人才——这是 SBC 和出色工作环境的结果——我相信 Palantir 很有可能能够在大数据/人工智能领域的各种未来市场中具有高度竞争力，而这些市场甚至可能还不存在。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Takeaway</b></p><p><blockquote><b>外卖</b></blockquote></p><p> In general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.</p><p><blockquote>总的来说，我不是一个成长型投资者——相反，我主要关注价格有吸引力、现金流强劲的股票，通常是那些支付股息的股票。然而，Palantir 在我的投资组合中有些异类——它是一只成长型股票，尚未真正盈利，而且其大部分潜力还需要数年时间。由于巨大的市场机会、优秀的人才和宽阔的护城河的极具吸引力的结合，Palantir 对我来说仍然是一项有吸引力的长期投资。这不是一只能让投资者快速致富的股票，但我相信 Palantir 很有可能在未来 10 多年内成为一家非常占主导地位的重要公司。明年收入的 19 倍，PLTR 并不便宜，但当我们预计该公司将在未来许多年内以强劲的速度增长时，这对我来说也一点也不奇怪。听听空头的论点是有道理的，但我相信这里利大于弊。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4475960-palantir-3-reasons-against-it-and-why-its-still-a-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117226796","content_text":"Summary\n\nPalantir Technologies is a battleground stock. Listening to the bears' arguments is a good idea for bulls.\nPLTR dilutes its shareholders, but that is not necessarily a huge problem.\nDespite some interest rate headwinds, PLTR seems like a good investment to me, thanks to a strong moat and great growth outlook.\n\nspxChrome/E+ via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nPalantir Technologies (PLTR) is an embattled growth stock, and in recent weeks, bears have been winning as shares continued to decline. There are, indeed some important bear arguments, such as dilution, reliance on government contracts, and rising interest rates. I do, however, still believe that Palantir Technologies is an attractive long-term investment, due to the act that its technology could lead to massive growth for many years to come.\n3 Issues Brought Up By Bears\nPalantir is a growth stock that brings out highly convinced bulls as well as highly convinced bears. Generally, I am in the bullish camp here, but taking a look at the bear arguments can be a good idea as well. Three of the most common arguments against Palantir are the following ones:\n1. Shareholder Dilution\nGrowth on a company-wide basis is important, but growth on a per-share basis is even more important. There are many examples that show that changes in a company's share count can create or destroy a lot of shareholder value. Apple (AAPL), for example, has seen its net income grow by roughly 190% over the last decade:\nData by YCharts\nThanks to a declining share count, its earnings per share rose by a much more attractive 350%, however -- buybacks created a lot of shareholder value. There are also examples where a rising share count destroyed a lot of shareholder value, e.g. at Citigroup (C):\nData by YCharts\nMassive share issuance during the Great Recession has resulted in a 75% earnings per share decline since 2007, even though net profits were up over the same time frame. Looking at the changes in a company's share count thus makes sense, as those changes can have a large impact in the long run. At Palantir, we see that the share count has been rising considerably since the company went public. During the most recent quarter, Palantir's share count looked like this:\nSource: Palantir Press Release\nCompared to the second quarter, Palantir's average share count was 1.895 billion, which makes for a 3.5% quarterly increase, which pencils out to an annual growth rate in the mid-teens. That is, of course, not negligible at all, and bears to have an argument when they state that shareholders get diluted at a meaningful pace. On the other hand, Palantir's business growth rate is way higher than 3% per quarter, as the company has guided for ~40% revenue growth this year, and since Palantir should also deliver outsized business growth in the coming years. Even if Palantir's share count were to climb by 10%-15% a year going forward, revenue per share would still climb by 25%+ a year thanks to the fact that PLTR is growing rapidly. I also believe that dilution will, over the years, decline. Not only has this been the case at many other growth companies, e.g. Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Meta (FB), but it is also logical from an option rewards perspective. Option rewards are especially generous when a company is not yet publicly traded and when its future is still more uncertain, but as a company matures, employees get more comfortable as risks for the company decline, and they do not demand large option packages any longer. Last but not least, Palantir also generates strong free cash flows that should allow the company to do share buybacks in the future, which should help improve the dilution rate as well.\n2. Reliance on government contracts\nIn a recent bearish article, fellow Seeking Alpha contributor On The Pulse argued that Palantir was overvalued and that its reliance on government contracts was an issue. Palantir Technologies is, indeed, reliant on government contracts to a large degree today, but I do not believe that this is a major issue. First, Palantir has diversified away from government contracts in the recent past, thanks to massive growth in its commercial business:\nSource: Palantir Technologies presentation\nIn fact, Palantir's commercial business has been growing much faster than its government business in the recent past, which shows that commercial customers from all kinds of industries apparently see a lot of value in Palantir's technology -- otherwise, they wouldn't be buying at a rapid pace. With\nWith the commercial business growth rate outpacing the government business growth rate, Palantir will, over the years, become a company that is less and less dependent on government contracts, and that will ultimately turn into a B2B-focused software/technology player. Even if Palantir were to remain a government-focused company forever, which seems unlikely based on the current growth rates of the individual business units, that would not necessarily be an issue. Working for the government means that there is very little counterparty risk and that existing relations can easily be used to get future contracts. Last but not least, with government budgets rising relatively steadily, good government connections allow for considerable growth opportunities -- especially in the defense tech/security tech space Palantir is active in, as there is a huge need for further investments in this space.\nThe claim that a government focus leads to lacking scalability is also false, I believe. Per Palantir's most recent quarterly report (linked above), its operating expenses rose by $9 million between Q3 2020 and Q3 2021 -- whereas revenues rose by $103 million in the same time frame. This backs out changes in share-based compensation. If one were to include those SBC expenses, Palantir's expenses actuallydeclinedyear-over-year while the company managed to grow its revenue by close to 40%. The claim that Palantir will not generate any scale advantages over the years thus seems to be unfounded, I believe. Instead, the data suggest that Palantir will be able to grow its margins considerably -- the company was able to grow its adjusted gross profit by a massive $90 million while growing its adjusted operating expenses by just $9 million -- making for excellent operating leverage.\n3. Exposure to rising rates\nMassive inflation will force the Fed to raise rates in 2022 and beyond, and that could be an issue for growth stocks. Companies that are not profitable today, or that have the vast majority of their profits in the distant future, are more exposed to a rising discount rate compared to companies that have low or no growth and that generate a large amount of all future profits in the near term. This could result in outperformance of value stocks versus growth stocks in the coming years, I believe. Palantir, which is not profitable yet, naturally belongs in the \"growth\" bucket that could see an above-average impact from rising interest rates. There is no real counter-argument here, I believe -- it is indeed true that the impact of rising rates on Palantir, all else equal, will be larger compared to a value stock like AbbVie (ABBV), for example.\nThis being an incremental negative for Palantir doesn't mean that shares have to be avoided under any circumstances, however. Indeed, even despite some potential headwinds from rising rates, Palantir could still be an attractive investment if other arguments have a larger weight -- I believe this to be true, as I see PLTR's massive growth potential and huge moat outweighing some near-term headwinds from rising rates.\nWhy Palantir Is Still Attractive\nBears bring up a range of arguments against Palantir, and as shown above, those can have merit. I believe that they might be overblown in some cases, but taking a look at the bear's arguments doesn't hurt -- in fact, it seems like a good idea to look at both sides in order to make a more informed decision. Dilution is indeed an issue, although I do not believe that this will be too much of a headwind, since PLTR's business growth easily outpaces dilution and since dilution, overall, should slow down over the years. Government reliance will wane over the years due to an above-average commercial business growth rate, and in general, doing business with the government is not a bad thing anyway. The claim that PLTR lacks scalability seems to be false, from what I see in PLTR's data.\nPalantir is, despite these arguments, attractive, I believe: The company is growing rapidly, has decades-long growth potential in both its government business as well as on the commercial side, and Palantir seems to have a very wide moat. This combination could turn Palantir into one of the largest and most important companies eventually -- although investors shouldn't expect this to happen in the very near term. Instead, I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will grow at a considerable rate throughout the 2020s and beyond, as our world becomes ever more data-hungry -- both governments, as well as enterprises, will try to get the most value out of all of this data, and Palantir, with its tailored solutions, will be there to offer that value to its customers. With new tools such as the recently-showcased Foundry for crypto, Palantir is at the forefront of all kinds of emerging technologies. Thanks to the fact that Palantir has access to top talent -- the result of SBC and of an excellent working environment-- I believe that there is a good chance that Palantir will be able to be highly competitive in all kinds of future markets in the Big Data/AI space that may not even exist yet.\nTakeaway\nIn general, I am not much of a growth investor -- instead, I primarily focus on attractively priced stocks with strong cash flows, oftentimes those that pay dividends. Palantir, however, is somewhat of an outlier in my portfolio -- it's a growth stock, it is not really profitable yet, and most of its potential is years away. Due to the highly attractive combination of a massive market opportunity, excellent talent, and a wide moat, Palantir still seems like an attractive long-term investment to me. This isn't a stock that will make investors rich quickly, but I believe that there is a very good chance that Palantir will turn into a very dominant, important company over the next 10+ years. At 19x next year's revenue, PLTR is not cheap, but when we expect that the company will grow at a strong rate for many years, that also doesn't seem outlandish to me at all. It makes sense to listen to the bears' arguments, but I believe that the pros outweigh the cons here.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}