glenn98的个人主页 - 老虎社区

glenn98

glenn98

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

8关注

1粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-07

Like pls

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-11-07

$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$z

2021-10-24

Like

WISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote>

2021-10-21

Like pls

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-21

Like pls

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-20

Like pls

Why some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote>

2021-10-19

Like pls

Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote>

2021-06-12

Wah

Investor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote>

2021-06-12

Wahxjssjjskskax

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3570504799814298","uuid":"3570504799814298","gmtCreate":1607517086544,"gmtModify":1634623831393,"name":"glenn98","pinyin":"glenn98","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":8,"tweetSize":9,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.01","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.52%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":845070288,"gmtCreate":1636257673058,"gmtModify":1636258028427,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845070288","repostId":"2181742244","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2033,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":845070023,"gmtCreate":1636257600834,"gmtModify":1636257600834,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FERN\">$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$</a>z","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FERN\">$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$</a>z","text":"$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$z","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f50e4aec8e02af32463c846b02a9924a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845070023","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2388,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":858636006,"gmtCreate":1635042817939,"gmtModify":1635042818015,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858636006","repostId":"1111559375","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111559375","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635038026,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111559375?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"WISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111559375","media":"TheStreet","summary":"WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justi","content":"<p>WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.</p><p><blockquote>WISH股价过去三天飙升近10%。如果没有公司具体的消息来恰当地证明积极的势头，该股的受欢迎程度可能是催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> After trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock&nbsp;found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.</p><p><blockquote>在过去几个月交易不佳之后，ContextLogic股票再次走高。仅10月20日一天，股价就上涨了14%。与此同时，该股票在Reddit上收到了大量评论，这可能有助于证明看涨市场行动的合理性。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e0424b0add4ae09c16fd60a8ab9616b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 1: Wish logo on a box.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：盒子上的愿望标志。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> As we&nbsp;mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在之前的文章中提到的，虽然该股仍接近历史低点，但动量投资者参加聚会可能还为时不晚。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Exposure may have done the trick</b></p><p><blockquote><b>曝光可能起到了作用</b></blockquote></p><p> A likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker&nbsp;received&nbsp;150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</p><p><blockquote>WISH短暂上涨背后的一个可能原因是该股在网上的受欢迎程度推高了股票需求。该股票的提及次数增加了150%，获得了高达35,000张赞成票——了解评论与股价上涨之间的相关性并不一定表明因果关系。请参阅下面10月21日Reddit上的热门股票。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/079bfbb083306bb71a80744d70297d15\" tg-width=\"1078\" tg-height=\"391\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2：10月21日Reddit上的趋势股票。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Another popularity&nbsp;tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.</p><p><blockquote>另一个受欢迎程度跟踪器（见下文）表明，在过去的三个月里，WISH的受欢迎程度一直很高。然而，直到最近，股价还不一定与讨论板上的曝光率同步变动。不过，股价可能很快就会出现震荡也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e68ad670e6a136155d3e6e9abfbce3c\" tg-width=\"527\" tg-height=\"571\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图3：WSB论坛上的WISH股票情绪。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently&nbsp;released&nbsp;report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.</p><p><blockquote>网络人气与WISH近期业绩的相关性与SEC近期发布的游戏驿站交易狂潮报告一致。2021年早些时候的反弹主要归因于Reddit等平台推动的散户投资者参与度的增加。同一份报告还质疑了空头回补与股价大幅上涨有很大关系的假设。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Dip buying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逢低买入</b></blockquote></p><p> This week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>本周的看涨攻击也可能是由于Wish股票如此接近历史低点。电子商务领域的增长受到疫情“结束的开始”和呆在家里的顺风的压力。此外，在第二季度业绩公布后，几位华尔街专家下调了WISH的评级，削弱了积极情绪。</blockquote></p><p> The above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated&nbsp;short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.</p><p><blockquote>上述似乎创造了一波看跌浪潮。WISH提高了空头兴趣，几乎占流通量的25%。如此高的比率可能会使卖空者处于弱势地位：交易量的增加加上出价过高可能会迫使一些人平仓，从而引发滚雪球效应。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Experts see upside</b></p><p><blockquote><b>专家看到上涨空间</b></blockquote></p><p> Lastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.</p><p><blockquote>最后，华尔街目前将Wish股票的一致目标价定为9.06美元，这表明较目前低于6美元的水平有55%的上涨潜力。尽管平均评级为中性，但即使是持怀疑态度的分析师仍然认为未来将会上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Credit Suisse’s Stephen Ju&nbsp;reduced&nbsp;his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.</p><p><blockquote>瑞信的Stephen Ju将目标价从24美元下调至19美元。在ContexLogic未能实现第二季度收入后，他下调了预测，并因客户保留率下降和使用率下降而调整了EBITDA预期。然而，分析师仍然认为未来有近200%的巨大上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> Citigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He&nbsp;has&nbsp;a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的尼古拉斯·琼斯则不那么乐观。他对该股给予中性评级，但预测未来股价为7.50美元，上涨潜力为23%。第二季度盈利被认为是下调价格目标的主要原因。琼斯先生还将股票表现不佳归因于公司难以维持增长，特别是由于用户流失率和广告率高于预期。</blockquote></p><p> On the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According&nbsp;to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.</p><p><blockquote>看跌方面，摩根大通和奥本海默对该股给予卖出评级，目标股价为4至5美元。根据前者的说法，由于经济重新开放，用户活动下降，以及Wish的留存和广告成本上升，是主要担忧。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>WISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-24 09:13</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.</p><p><blockquote>WISH股价过去三天飙升近10%。如果没有公司具体的消息来恰当地证明积极的势头，该股的受欢迎程度可能是催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> After trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock&nbsp;found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.</p><p><blockquote>在过去几个月交易不佳之后，ContextLogic股票再次走高。仅10月20日一天，股价就上涨了14%。与此同时，该股票在Reddit上收到了大量评论，这可能有助于证明看涨市场行动的合理性。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e0424b0add4ae09c16fd60a8ab9616b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 1: Wish logo on a box.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：盒子上的愿望标志。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> As we&nbsp;mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在之前的文章中提到的，虽然该股仍接近历史低点，但动量投资者参加聚会可能还为时不晚。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Exposure may have done the trick</b></p><p><blockquote><b>曝光可能起到了作用</b></blockquote></p><p> A likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker&nbsp;received&nbsp;150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</p><p><blockquote>WISH短暂上涨背后的一个可能原因是该股在网上的受欢迎程度推高了股票需求。该股票的提及次数增加了150%，获得了高达35,000张赞成票——了解评论与股价上涨之间的相关性并不一定表明因果关系。请参阅下面10月21日Reddit上的热门股票。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/079bfbb083306bb71a80744d70297d15\" tg-width=\"1078\" tg-height=\"391\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2：10月21日Reddit上的趋势股票。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Another popularity&nbsp;tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.</p><p><blockquote>另一个受欢迎程度跟踪器（见下文）表明，在过去的三个月里，WISH的受欢迎程度一直很高。然而，直到最近，股价还不一定与讨论板上的曝光率同步变动。不过，股价可能很快就会出现震荡也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e68ad670e6a136155d3e6e9abfbce3c\" tg-width=\"527\" tg-height=\"571\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图3：WSB论坛上的WISH股票情绪。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently&nbsp;released&nbsp;report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.</p><p><blockquote>网络人气与WISH近期业绩的相关性与SEC近期发布的游戏驿站交易狂潮报告一致。2021年早些时候的反弹主要归因于Reddit等平台推动的散户投资者参与度的增加。同一份报告还质疑了空头回补与股价大幅上涨有很大关系的假设。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Dip buying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逢低买入</b></blockquote></p><p> This week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>本周的看涨攻击也可能是由于Wish股票如此接近历史低点。电子商务领域的增长受到疫情“结束的开始”和呆在家里的顺风的压力。此外，在第二季度业绩公布后，几位华尔街专家下调了WISH的评级，削弱了积极情绪。</blockquote></p><p> The above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated&nbsp;short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.</p><p><blockquote>上述似乎创造了一波看跌浪潮。WISH提高了空头兴趣，几乎占流通量的25%。如此高的比率可能会使卖空者处于弱势地位：交易量的增加加上出价过高可能会迫使一些人平仓，从而引发滚雪球效应。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Experts see upside</b></p><p><blockquote><b>专家看到上涨空间</b></blockquote></p><p> Lastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.</p><p><blockquote>最后，华尔街目前将Wish股票的一致目标价定为9.06美元，这表明较目前低于6美元的水平有55%的上涨潜力。尽管平均评级为中性，但即使是持怀疑态度的分析师仍然认为未来将会上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Credit Suisse’s Stephen Ju&nbsp;reduced&nbsp;his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.</p><p><blockquote>瑞信的Stephen Ju将目标价从24美元下调至19美元。在ContexLogic未能实现第二季度收入后，他下调了预测，并因客户保留率下降和使用率下降而调整了EBITDA预期。然而，分析师仍然认为未来有近200%的巨大上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> Citigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He&nbsp;has&nbsp;a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的尼古拉斯·琼斯则不那么乐观。他对该股给予中性评级，但预测未来股价为7.50美元，上涨潜力为23%。第二季度盈利被认为是下调价格目标的主要原因。琼斯先生还将股票表现不佳归因于公司难以维持增长，特别是由于用户流失率和广告率高于预期。</blockquote></p><p> On the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According&nbsp;to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.</p><p><blockquote>看跌方面，摩根大通和奥本海默对该股给予卖出评级，目标股价为4至5美元。根据前者的说法，由于经济重新开放，用户活动下降，以及Wish的留存和广告成本上升，是主要担忧。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/other-memes/wish-stock-what-momentum-investors-wish-to-see\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/other-memes/wish-stock-what-momentum-investors-wish-to-see","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111559375","content_text":"WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.\nAfter trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.\nFigure 1: Wish logo on a box.\nAs we mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.\nExposure may have done the trick\nA likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker received 150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.\nFigure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.\nAnother popularity tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.\nFigure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.\nThe correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently released report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.\nDip buying\nThis week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.\nThe above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.\nExperts see upside\nLastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.\nCredit Suisse’s Stephen Ju reduced his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.\nCitigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He has a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.\nOn the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"WISH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1942,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":853661158,"gmtCreate":1634801929420,"gmtModify":1634801929537,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/853661158","repostId":"1119150816","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3769,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":853663715,"gmtCreate":1634801838890,"gmtModify":1634801839007,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/853663715","repostId":"2177439820","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859258703,"gmtCreate":1634703100111,"gmtModify":1634703137799,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859258703","repostId":"1126698054","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126698054","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634698575,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126698054?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-20 10:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126698054","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) - Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Ch","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）——</b>忘掉格林奇吧：看起来供应链中断可能会偷走今年的圣诞节。但这些问题会在2022年初得到解决吗？</blockquote></p><p> Several retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that&nbsp;global supply chain constraints&nbsp;will lead to not only&nbsp;fewer discounts&nbsp;during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.</p><p><blockquote>多家零售商、制造商和经济学家都警告称，全球供应链限制不仅会导致假期折扣减少，还会导致商店货架上的产品可能短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些高管和市场专家认为，最糟糕的时期可能会在短短几个月内过去。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan Chase(JPM)&nbsp;CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that&nbsp;supply chain woes will be a distant memory&nbsp;by this time next year.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPM）首席执行官杰米·戴蒙（Jamie Dimon）上周在与记者举行的财报看涨期权上表示，到明年这个时候，供应链困境将成为遥远的记忆。</blockquote></p><p> \"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.</p><p><blockquote>戴蒙表示：“一年后我们很有可能根本不会谈论供应链。”</blockquote></p><p> Others note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.</p><p><blockquote>其他人指出，大公司和运输运营商也在采取措施缓解这些问题。</blockquote></p><p> Jack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as&nbsp;Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF)&nbsp;and&nbsp;Intel(INTC)&nbsp;are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.</p><p><blockquote>Natixis Investment Managers的投资组合策略师Jack Janasiewicz在一封电子邮件中指出，丰田(TM)、三星(SSNLF)和英特尔(INTC)等巨头公司正计划在今年最后几个月提高产量，部分原因是关键零部件的可用性增加。</blockquote></p><p> Major ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.</p><p><blockquote>长滩和洛杉矶等主要港口现在也希望保持全天候运营，以应对供应链瓶颈。</blockquote></p><p> \"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"</p><p><blockquote>花旗分析师克里斯蒂安·韦瑟比(Christian Wetherbee)在上周的一份报告中表示：“拥堵问题可能已经过去，流动性和交易量可能会增加。”“这在美国和亚洲港口拥堵缓解的早期迹象中显而易见。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile executives from&nbsp;Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UPS(UPS)&nbsp;met with President Joe Biden to&nbsp;try to find solutions&nbsp;for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，沃尔玛(WMT)、塔吉特(TGT)、联邦快递(FDX)和联合包裹(UPS)的高管会见了总统乔·拜登，试图为影响零售商和托运人的问题找到解决方案。</blockquote></p><p> \"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师在最近的一份报告中表示：“全球供应链已经非常薄弱。”但他们补充说，“我们可能已经目睹了最糟糕的情况”，到2022年上半年，“影响可能会缓解”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Problems may persist longer than some companies expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>问题持续的时间可能比一些公司预期的要长</b></blockquote></p><p> But it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.</p><p><blockquote>但一些公司和策略师可能过于乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Profits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.</p><p><blockquote>由于运输延误，利润可能会受到打击。人们也有理由担心，在可预见的未来，这些问题将导致价格上涨，一些消费者可能会因此推迟购买非必需品。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity&nbsp;to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，这个问题不仅仅是将海外商品运送到美国。国内卡车司机可能没有足够的能力来处理所有需要从港口到仓库和商店的产品。</blockquote></p><p> For example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate&nbsp;Danone(DANOY)&nbsp;warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.</p><p><blockquote>例如，欧洲乳制品和植物性食品集团达能(DANOY)周二在与分析师的销售看涨期权中警告称，未来价格将上涨。罪魁祸首：卡车运输相关问题。</blockquote></p><p> \"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.</p><p><blockquote>达能首席执行官于尔根·埃塞尔(Juergen Esser)表示：“我们今年（下半年）看到的通胀部分原因是运输紧张。让我们非常明确，因为我们看到美国卡车的即期运价处于创纪录水平。”财务、技术和数据官。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，埃塞尔表示，达能可能面临约7%至9%的更高运输成本。这要么最终伤害利润率较低的投资者，要么伤害消费者，他们可能会发现自己在超市为酸奶支付更多费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-20 10:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>New York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）——</b>忘掉格林奇吧：看起来供应链中断可能会偷走今年的圣诞节。但这些问题会在2022年初得到解决吗？</blockquote></p><p> Several retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that&nbsp;global supply chain constraints&nbsp;will lead to not only&nbsp;fewer discounts&nbsp;during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.</p><p><blockquote>多家零售商、制造商和经济学家都警告称，全球供应链限制不仅会导致假期折扣减少，还会导致商店货架上的产品可能短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些高管和市场专家认为，最糟糕的时期可能会在短短几个月内过去。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan Chase(JPM)&nbsp;CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that&nbsp;supply chain woes will be a distant memory&nbsp;by this time next year.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPM）首席执行官杰米·戴蒙（Jamie Dimon）上周在与记者举行的财报看涨期权上表示，到明年这个时候，供应链困境将成为遥远的记忆。</blockquote></p><p> \"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.</p><p><blockquote>戴蒙表示：“一年后我们很有可能根本不会谈论供应链。”</blockquote></p><p> Others note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.</p><p><blockquote>其他人指出，大公司和运输运营商也在采取措施缓解这些问题。</blockquote></p><p> Jack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as&nbsp;Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF)&nbsp;and&nbsp;Intel(INTC)&nbsp;are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.</p><p><blockquote>Natixis Investment Managers的投资组合策略师Jack Janasiewicz在一封电子邮件中指出，丰田(TM)、三星(SSNLF)和英特尔(INTC)等巨头公司正计划在今年最后几个月提高产量，部分原因是关键零部件的可用性增加。</blockquote></p><p> Major ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.</p><p><blockquote>长滩和洛杉矶等主要港口现在也希望保持全天候运营，以应对供应链瓶颈。</blockquote></p><p> \"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"</p><p><blockquote>花旗分析师克里斯蒂安·韦瑟比(Christian Wetherbee)在上周的一份报告中表示：“拥堵问题可能已经过去，流动性和交易量可能会增加。”“这在美国和亚洲港口拥堵缓解的早期迹象中显而易见。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile executives from&nbsp;Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UPS(UPS)&nbsp;met with President Joe Biden to&nbsp;try to find solutions&nbsp;for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，沃尔玛(WMT)、塔吉特(TGT)、联邦快递(FDX)和联合包裹(UPS)的高管会见了总统乔·拜登，试图为影响零售商和托运人的问题找到解决方案。</blockquote></p><p> \"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师在最近的一份报告中表示：“全球供应链已经非常薄弱。”但他们补充说，“我们可能已经目睹了最糟糕的情况”，到2022年上半年，“影响可能会缓解”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Problems may persist longer than some companies expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>问题持续的时间可能比一些公司预期的要长</b></blockquote></p><p> But it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.</p><p><blockquote>但一些公司和策略师可能过于乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Profits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.</p><p><blockquote>由于运输延误，利润可能会受到打击。人们也有理由担心，在可预见的未来，这些问题将导致价格上涨，一些消费者可能会因此推迟购买非必需品。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity&nbsp;to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，这个问题不仅仅是将海外商品运送到美国。国内卡车司机可能没有足够的能力来处理所有需要从港口到仓库和商店的产品。</blockquote></p><p> For example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate&nbsp;Danone(DANOY)&nbsp;warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.</p><p><blockquote>例如，欧洲乳制品和植物性食品集团达能(DANOY)周二在与分析师的销售看涨期权中警告称，未来价格将上涨。罪魁祸首：卡车运输相关问题。</blockquote></p><p> \"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.</p><p><blockquote>达能首席执行官于尔根·埃塞尔(Juergen Esser)表示：“我们今年（下半年）看到的通胀部分原因是运输紧张。让我们非常明确，因为我们看到美国卡车的即期运价处于创纪录水平。”财务、技术和数据官。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，埃塞尔表示，达能可能面临约7%至9%的更高运输成本。这要么最终伤害利润率较低的投资者，要么伤害消费者，他们可能会发现自己在超市为酸奶支付更多费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/supply-chain-economy/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/supply-chain-economy/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126698054","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?\nSeveral retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that global supply chain constraints will lead to not only fewer discounts during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.\nStill, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.\nJPMorgan Chase(JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that supply chain woes will be a distant memory by this time next year.\n\"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.\nOthers note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.\nJack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF) and Intel(INTC) are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.\nMajor ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.\n\"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"\nMeanwhile executives from Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX) and UPS(UPS) met with President Joe Biden to try to find solutions for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.\n\"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.\nProblems may persist longer than some companies expect\nBut it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.\nProfits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.\nWhat's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.\nFor example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate Danone(DANOY) warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.\n\"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.\nWith that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2579,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":850456319,"gmtCreate":1634619564375,"gmtModify":1634619727479,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850456319","repostId":"1130016296","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130016296","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1634613697,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1130016296?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 11:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130016296","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.\n\nLei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor'","content":"<p>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/624e5188afd65ef1997deb92ab8d99a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Lei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.</p><p><blockquote>小米集团董事长雷军今日在投资者日宣布，小米造车进度和团队各项工作远超他预期。预计小米汽车将在2024年上半年正式量产。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8a6580e1de3271305368459ed0163e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-19 11:21</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/624e5188afd65ef1997deb92ab8d99a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Lei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.</p><p><blockquote>小米集团董事长雷军今日在投资者日宣布，小米造车进度和团队各项工作远超他预期。预计小米汽车将在2024年上半年正式量产。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8a6580e1de3271305368459ed0163e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01810":"小米集团-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130016296","content_text":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.\n\nLei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"01810":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2006,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":186399350,"gmtCreate":1623472094970,"gmtModify":1634032672434,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wah","listText":"Wah","text":"Wah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186399350","repostId":"1147474880","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147474880","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623470168,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147474880?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-12 11:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147474880","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless ris","content":"<p>  Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.  I’ve had it.</p><p><blockquote>了解投机和投资之间的区别对于避免鲁莽风险至关重要。我受够了。</blockquote></p><p> The Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.</p><p><blockquote>关于金融最基本的区别之一，《华尔街日报》是错误的，而且几十年来一直是错误的。我再也受不了了。</blockquote></p><p> If you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.</p><p><blockquote>如果你购买一只股票纯粹是因为它上涨了很多，而没有对其进行任何研究，那么你就不是——正如《华尔街日报》及其编辑奇怪地坚持这样称呼你的那样——“投资者”。如果你购买加密货币是因为，嘿，这听起来很有趣，你也不是投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Whenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.</p><p><blockquote>每当你购买任何金融资产是因为你有一个只是为了好玩，或者因为某个名人正在大肆宣传它，而其他人似乎也在购买它，你就不是在投资。</blockquote></p><p> You’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.</p><p><blockquote>你绝对是一个交易者：刚刚购买了一项资产的人。你可能是一个投机者：认为其他人会比你付出更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> Of course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%<i>are</i>investors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.</p><p><blockquote>当然，有些人购买像GameStopCorp.GME 5.88%这样的模因股票<i>是</i>投资者。他们阅读公司的财务报表，研究基础业务的健康状况，并了解还有谁在做空股票。同样，许多数字硬币的买家也投入了时间和精力来了解加密货币的工作原理以及它如何重塑金融。</blockquote></p><p> An investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.</p><p><blockquote>投资者依赖于内部回报来源：收益、收入、资产价值的增长。投机者依赖外部回报来源：主要是其他人是否会支付更多，而不考虑基本价值。</blockquote></p><p> The word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.</p><p><blockquote>投资者这个词来自拉丁语“investire”，意思是穿着或打扮自己，包围或包围。你永远不会在不知道衣服是什么颜色或由什么材料制成的情况下穿衣服。同样，你不能投资你一无所知的资产。</blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，《华尔街日报》及其编辑长期以来一直将几乎所有购买任何东西的人称为“投资者”。1962年7月12日，《华尔街日报》发表了经典著作《证券分析》和《聪明的投资者》的作者本杰明·格雷厄姆写给编辑的一封信。格雷厄姆抱怨说，那年6月，《华尔街日报》发表了一篇文章，标题是“许多小投资者押注进一步下跌，卖空零星股票”。</blockquote></p><p> He wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)</p><p><blockquote>他写道：“根据‘投资’的什么定义，人们可以给那些通过卖空零头在股市上下注的小人物起‘投资者’这个名字呢？”（做空奇数手就是借入并卖出少于100股的股票，押注股票会下跌——无论在当时还是现在，这都是一个昂贵且有风险的赌注。）</blockquote></p><p> “If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”</p><p><blockquote>“如果这些人是投资者，”格雷厄姆问道，“我们应该如何定义‘投机’和‘投机者’？难道目前未能区分投资和投机的做法不仅会对个人，而且会对整个金融界造成严重伤害吗——就像20世纪20年代末那样？”</blockquote></p><p> Graham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆并不是一个认为市场应该是富人专属游乐场的势利小人。他写了《聪明的投资者》，明确的目的是帮助不太富裕的人明智地参与股市。</blockquote></p><p> In that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆在那本书（本专栏就是以其命名的）中说：“彻头彻尾的投机既不违法、不道德，也（对大多数人来说）不会让钱包发胖。”</blockquote></p><p> However, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，他警告说，这会带来三种危险：“（1）当你认为自己在投资时进行投机；（2）当你缺乏适当的知识和技能时，认真地投机而不是作为一种消遣；以及（3）冒更多钱的风险投机超出了你的承受能力。”</blockquote></p><p> Most investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.</p><p><blockquote>大多数投资者每隔一段时间就会投机一点。就像彩票或偶尔去赛马场或赌场一样，一点点是无害的乐趣。很多都不是。</blockquote></p><p> If you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为你在投机时是在投资，你会将哪怕是短暂的成功归因于技能，即使运气是最可能的解释。这会导致你冒鲁莽的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Take speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.</p><p><blockquote>把投机看得太重，它会变成一种痴迷和上瘾。你变得无法接受你的损失，也无法关注未来超过几分钟。接下来你知道的是，你在篝火上投入了更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> I think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，将交易者和投机者称为“投资者”会将许多新来者推向他们不应该承担的风险和他们无法承受的损失的滑坡。我热切地希望《华尔街日报》及其编辑最终不再使用“投资者”作为任何进行交易的人的默认术语。</blockquote></p><p> “ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”</p><p><blockquote>“‘投资者’在英语中作为一个包罗万象的术语有着悠久的历史，指的是那些投入资本并期望回报的人，无论时间长短，无论他们阅读的投资专栏有多少，”《华尔街日报》财经编辑查尔斯·福雷尔在回应我的投诉时说道。“至少可以追溯到19世纪中叶，‘投资’甚至被用来描述赌马——这种活动与基本面分析的脱节程度肯定不亚于购买狗狗币。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.</p><p><blockquote>我听到了，老板，但我还是认为你错了。《华尔街日报》不可能仅仅因为字典上说我们可以，就说一个休闲赌徒在赛马场“投资”。</blockquote></p><p> Calling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.</p><p><blockquote>将新手投机者称为“投资者”是营销人员助长过度交易的最有力方式之一。</blockquote></p><p> Ina recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”</p><p><blockquote>在最近的Instagram帖子中，一位名叫拉娜·罗迪斯(Lana Rhoades)的前色情明星穿着——嗯，大部分是穿着——比基尼，举着似乎是格雷厄姆的《聪明的投资者》。据IMDb.com报道，她主演了《Tushy》和《Make Me Meow》等视频。</blockquote></p><p> In her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.</p><p><blockquote>在她被近180万人“点赞”的帖子中，罗迪斯宣布她将推广一种名为PAWGCoin的加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> The currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)</p><p><blockquote>该货币的网站称，这枚硬币是为“那些向发达的后躯致敬的人”准备的。（我得到可靠消息，PAWG代表胖屁股白人女孩。）</blockquote></p><p> PAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.</p><p><blockquote>据追踪此类数字货币的网站Poocoin.io称，自Rhoades女士6月初开始推广PAWGcoin以来，PAWGcoin已上涨约900%。</blockquote></p><p> Ms. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”</p><p><blockquote>罗迪斯女士在推特上写道“我每天早上也阅读《华尔街日报》”，但记者无法联系到她置评。PAWGcoin的网站鼓励访问者“立即投资”。</blockquote></p><p> In Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.</p><p><blockquote>在罗迪斯的Instagram帖子中，她举着一本打开的《聪明的投资者》，封面是颠倒的。她似乎是闭着眼睛读的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Wall Street Journal</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-12 11:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.  I’ve had it.</p><p><blockquote>了解投机和投资之间的区别对于避免鲁莽风险至关重要。我受够了。</blockquote></p><p> The Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.</p><p><blockquote>关于金融最基本的区别之一，《华尔街日报》是错误的，而且几十年来一直是错误的。我再也受不了了。</blockquote></p><p> If you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.</p><p><blockquote>如果你购买一只股票纯粹是因为它上涨了很多，而没有对其进行任何研究，那么你就不是——正如《华尔街日报》及其编辑奇怪地坚持这样称呼你的那样——“投资者”。如果你购买加密货币是因为，嘿，这听起来很有趣，你也不是投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Whenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.</p><p><blockquote>每当你购买任何金融资产是因为你有一个只是为了好玩，或者因为某个名人正在大肆宣传它，而其他人似乎也在购买它，你就不是在投资。</blockquote></p><p> You’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.</p><p><blockquote>你绝对是一个交易者：刚刚购买了一项资产的人。你可能是一个投机者：认为其他人会比你付出更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> Of course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%<i>are</i>investors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.</p><p><blockquote>当然，有些人购买像GameStopCorp.GME 5.88%这样的模因股票<i>是</i>投资者。他们阅读公司的财务报表，研究基础业务的健康状况，并了解还有谁在做空股票。同样，许多数字硬币的买家也投入了时间和精力来了解加密货币的工作原理以及它如何重塑金融。</blockquote></p><p> An investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.</p><p><blockquote>投资者依赖于内部回报来源：收益、收入、资产价值的增长。投机者依赖外部回报来源：主要是其他人是否会支付更多，而不考虑基本价值。</blockquote></p><p> The word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.</p><p><blockquote>投资者这个词来自拉丁语“investire”，意思是穿着或打扮自己，包围或包围。你永远不会在不知道衣服是什么颜色或由什么材料制成的情况下穿衣服。同样，你不能投资你一无所知的资产。</blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，《华尔街日报》及其编辑长期以来一直将几乎所有购买任何东西的人称为“投资者”。1962年7月12日，《华尔街日报》发表了经典著作《证券分析》和《聪明的投资者》的作者本杰明·格雷厄姆写给编辑的一封信。格雷厄姆抱怨说，那年6月，《华尔街日报》发表了一篇文章，标题是“许多小投资者押注进一步下跌，卖空零星股票”。</blockquote></p><p> He wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)</p><p><blockquote>他写道：“根据‘投资’的什么定义，人们可以给那些通过卖空零头在股市上下注的小人物起‘投资者’这个名字呢？”（做空奇数手就是借入并卖出少于100股的股票，押注股票会下跌——无论在当时还是现在，这都是一个昂贵且有风险的赌注。）</blockquote></p><p> “If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”</p><p><blockquote>“如果这些人是投资者，”格雷厄姆问道，“我们应该如何定义‘投机’和‘投机者’？难道目前未能区分投资和投机的做法不仅会对个人，而且会对整个金融界造成严重伤害吗——就像20世纪20年代末那样？”</blockquote></p><p> Graham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆并不是一个认为市场应该是富人专属游乐场的势利小人。他写了《聪明的投资者》，明确的目的是帮助不太富裕的人明智地参与股市。</blockquote></p><p> In that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆在那本书（本专栏就是以其命名的）中说：“彻头彻尾的投机既不违法、不道德，也（对大多数人来说）不会让钱包发胖。”</blockquote></p><p> However, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，他警告说，这会带来三种危险：“（1）当你认为自己在投资时进行投机；（2）当你缺乏适当的知识和技能时，认真地投机而不是作为一种消遣；以及（3）冒更多钱的风险投机超出了你的承受能力。”</blockquote></p><p> Most investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.</p><p><blockquote>大多数投资者每隔一段时间就会投机一点。就像彩票或偶尔去赛马场或赌场一样，一点点是无害的乐趣。很多都不是。</blockquote></p><p> If you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为你在投机时是在投资，你会将哪怕是短暂的成功归因于技能，即使运气是最可能的解释。这会导致你冒鲁莽的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Take speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.</p><p><blockquote>把投机看得太重，它会变成一种痴迷和上瘾。你变得无法接受你的损失，也无法关注未来超过几分钟。接下来你知道的是，你在篝火上投入了更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> I think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，将交易者和投机者称为“投资者”会将许多新来者推向他们不应该承担的风险和他们无法承受的损失的滑坡。我热切地希望《华尔街日报》及其编辑最终不再使用“投资者”作为任何进行交易的人的默认术语。</blockquote></p><p> “ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”</p><p><blockquote>“‘投资者’在英语中作为一个包罗万象的术语有着悠久的历史，指的是那些投入资本并期望回报的人，无论时间长短，无论他们阅读的投资专栏有多少，”《华尔街日报》财经编辑查尔斯·福雷尔在回应我的投诉时说道。“至少可以追溯到19世纪中叶，‘投资’甚至被用来描述赌马——这种活动与基本面分析的脱节程度肯定不亚于购买狗狗币。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.</p><p><blockquote>我听到了，老板，但我还是认为你错了。《华尔街日报》不可能仅仅因为字典上说我们可以，就说一个休闲赌徒在赛马场“投资”。</blockquote></p><p> Calling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.</p><p><blockquote>将新手投机者称为“投资者”是营销人员助长过度交易的最有力方式之一。</blockquote></p><p> Ina recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”</p><p><blockquote>在最近的Instagram帖子中，一位名叫拉娜·罗迪斯(Lana Rhoades)的前色情明星穿着——嗯，大部分是穿着——比基尼，举着似乎是格雷厄姆的《聪明的投资者》。据IMDb.com报道，她主演了《Tushy》和《Make Me Meow》等视频。</blockquote></p><p> In her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.</p><p><blockquote>在她被近180万人“点赞”的帖子中，罗迪斯宣布她将推广一种名为PAWGCoin的加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> The currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)</p><p><blockquote>该货币的网站称，这枚硬币是为“那些向发达的后躯致敬的人”准备的。（我得到可靠消息，PAWG代表胖屁股白人女孩。）</blockquote></p><p> PAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.</p><p><blockquote>据追踪此类数字货币的网站Poocoin.io称，自Rhoades女士6月初开始推广PAWGcoin以来，PAWGcoin已上涨约900%。</blockquote></p><p> Ms. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”</p><p><blockquote>罗迪斯女士在推特上写道“我每天早上也阅读《华尔街日报》”，但记者无法联系到她置评。PAWGcoin的网站鼓励访问者“立即投资”。</blockquote></p><p> In Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.</p><p><blockquote>在罗迪斯的Instagram帖子中，她举着一本打开的《聪明的投资者》，封面是颠倒的。她似乎是闭着眼睛读的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-cant-invest-without-trading-you-can-trade-without-investing-11623426213?mod=markets_lead_pos5\">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-cant-invest-without-trading-you-can-trade-without-investing-11623426213?mod=markets_lead_pos5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147474880","content_text":"Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.\n\nI’ve had it.\nThe Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.\nIf you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.\nWhenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.\nYou’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.\nOf course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%areinvestors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.\nAn investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.\nThe word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.\nNevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”\nHe wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)\n“If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”\nGraham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.\nIn that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”\nHowever, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”\nMost investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.\nIf you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.\nTake speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.\nI think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.\n“ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”\nI hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.\nCalling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.\nIna recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”\nIn her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.\nThe currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)\nPAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.\nMs. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”\nIn Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1702,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186304301,"gmtCreate":1623471968603,"gmtModify":1634032674722,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wahxjssjjskskax","listText":"Wahxjssjjskskax","text":"Wahxjssjjskskax","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186304301","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2462,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":858636006,"gmtCreate":1635042817939,"gmtModify":1635042818015,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/858636006","repostId":"1111559375","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111559375","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1635038026,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111559375?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-24 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"WISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111559375","media":"TheStreet","summary":"WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justi","content":"<p>WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.</p><p><blockquote>WISH股价过去三天飙升近10%。如果没有公司具体的消息来恰当地证明积极的势头，该股的受欢迎程度可能是催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> After trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock&nbsp;found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.</p><p><blockquote>在过去几个月交易不佳之后，ContextLogic股票再次走高。仅10月20日一天，股价就上涨了14%。与此同时，该股票在Reddit上收到了大量评论，这可能有助于证明看涨市场行动的合理性。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e0424b0add4ae09c16fd60a8ab9616b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 1: Wish logo on a box.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：盒子上的愿望标志。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> As we&nbsp;mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在之前的文章中提到的，虽然该股仍接近历史低点，但动量投资者参加聚会可能还为时不晚。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Exposure may have done the trick</b></p><p><blockquote><b>曝光可能起到了作用</b></blockquote></p><p> A likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker&nbsp;received&nbsp;150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</p><p><blockquote>WISH短暂上涨背后的一个可能原因是该股在网上的受欢迎程度推高了股票需求。该股票的提及次数增加了150%，获得了高达35,000张赞成票——了解评论与股价上涨之间的相关性并不一定表明因果关系。请参阅下面10月21日Reddit上的热门股票。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/079bfbb083306bb71a80744d70297d15\" tg-width=\"1078\" tg-height=\"391\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2：10月21日Reddit上的趋势股票。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Another popularity&nbsp;tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.</p><p><blockquote>另一个受欢迎程度跟踪器（见下文）表明，在过去的三个月里，WISH的受欢迎程度一直很高。然而，直到最近，股价还不一定与讨论板上的曝光率同步变动。不过，股价可能很快就会出现震荡也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e68ad670e6a136155d3e6e9abfbce3c\" tg-width=\"527\" tg-height=\"571\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图3：WSB论坛上的WISH股票情绪。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently&nbsp;released&nbsp;report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.</p><p><blockquote>网络人气与WISH近期业绩的相关性与SEC近期发布的游戏驿站交易狂潮报告一致。2021年早些时候的反弹主要归因于Reddit等平台推动的散户投资者参与度的增加。同一份报告还质疑了空头回补与股价大幅上涨有很大关系的假设。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Dip buying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逢低买入</b></blockquote></p><p> This week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>本周的看涨攻击也可能是由于Wish股票如此接近历史低点。电子商务领域的增长受到疫情“结束的开始”和呆在家里的顺风的压力。此外，在第二季度业绩公布后，几位华尔街专家下调了WISH的评级，削弱了积极情绪。</blockquote></p><p> The above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated&nbsp;short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.</p><p><blockquote>上述似乎创造了一波看跌浪潮。WISH提高了空头兴趣，几乎占流通量的25%。如此高的比率可能会使卖空者处于弱势地位：交易量的增加加上出价过高可能会迫使一些人平仓，从而引发滚雪球效应。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Experts see upside</b></p><p><blockquote><b>专家看到上涨空间</b></blockquote></p><p> Lastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.</p><p><blockquote>最后，华尔街目前将Wish股票的一致目标价定为9.06美元，这表明较目前低于6美元的水平有55%的上涨潜力。尽管平均评级为中性，但即使是持怀疑态度的分析师仍然认为未来将会上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Credit Suisse’s Stephen Ju&nbsp;reduced&nbsp;his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.</p><p><blockquote>瑞信的Stephen Ju将目标价从24美元下调至19美元。在ContexLogic未能实现第二季度收入后，他下调了预测，并因客户保留率下降和使用率下降而调整了EBITDA预期。然而，分析师仍然认为未来有近200%的巨大上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> Citigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He&nbsp;has&nbsp;a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的尼古拉斯·琼斯则不那么乐观。他对该股给予中性评级，但预测未来股价为7.50美元，上涨潜力为23%。第二季度盈利被认为是下调价格目标的主要原因。琼斯先生还将股票表现不佳归因于公司难以维持增长，特别是由于用户流失率和广告率高于预期。</blockquote></p><p> On the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According&nbsp;to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.</p><p><blockquote>看跌方面，摩根大通和奥本海默对该股给予卖出评级，目标股价为4至5美元。根据前者的说法，由于经济重新开放，用户活动下降，以及Wish的留存和广告成本上升，是主要担忧。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>WISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWISH Stock: What Momentum Investors Wish To See<blockquote>愿望股票：投资者希望看到什么势头</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">TheStreet</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-24 09:13</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.</p><p><blockquote>WISH股价过去三天飙升近10%。如果没有公司具体的消息来恰当地证明积极的势头，该股的受欢迎程度可能是催化剂。</blockquote></p><p> After trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock&nbsp;found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.</p><p><blockquote>在过去几个月交易不佳之后，ContextLogic股票再次走高。仅10月20日一天，股价就上涨了14%。与此同时，该股票在Reddit上收到了大量评论，这可能有助于证明看涨市场行动的合理性。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e0424b0add4ae09c16fd60a8ab9616b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 1: Wish logo on a box.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图1：盒子上的愿望标志。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> As we&nbsp;mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.</p><p><blockquote>正如我们在之前的文章中提到的，虽然该股仍接近历史低点，但动量投资者参加聚会可能还为时不晚。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Exposure may have done the trick</b></p><p><blockquote><b>曝光可能起到了作用</b></blockquote></p><p> A likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker&nbsp;received&nbsp;150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</p><p><blockquote>WISH短暂上涨背后的一个可能原因是该股在网上的受欢迎程度推高了股票需求。该股票的提及次数增加了150%，获得了高达35,000张赞成票——了解评论与股价上涨之间的相关性并不一定表明因果关系。请参阅下面10月21日Reddit上的热门股票。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/079bfbb083306bb71a80744d70297d15\" tg-width=\"1078\" tg-height=\"391\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图2：10月21日Reddit上的趋势股票。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Another popularity&nbsp;tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.</p><p><blockquote>另一个受欢迎程度跟踪器（见下文）表明，在过去的三个月里，WISH的受欢迎程度一直很高。然而，直到最近，股价还不一定与讨论板上的曝光率同步变动。不过，股价可能很快就会出现震荡也就不足为奇了。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e68ad670e6a136155d3e6e9abfbce3c\" tg-width=\"527\" tg-height=\"571\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Figure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图3：WSB论坛上的WISH股票情绪。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> The correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently&nbsp;released&nbsp;report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.</p><p><blockquote>网络人气与WISH近期业绩的相关性与SEC近期发布的游戏驿站交易狂潮报告一致。2021年早些时候的反弹主要归因于Reddit等平台推动的散户投资者参与度的增加。同一份报告还质疑了空头回补与股价大幅上涨有很大关系的假设。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Dip buying</b></p><p><blockquote><b>逢低买入</b></blockquote></p><p> This week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.</p><p><blockquote>本周的看涨攻击也可能是由于Wish股票如此接近历史低点。电子商务领域的增长受到疫情“结束的开始”和呆在家里的顺风的压力。此外，在第二季度业绩公布后，几位华尔街专家下调了WISH的评级，削弱了积极情绪。</blockquote></p><p> The above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated&nbsp;short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.</p><p><blockquote>上述似乎创造了一波看跌浪潮。WISH提高了空头兴趣，几乎占流通量的25%。如此高的比率可能会使卖空者处于弱势地位：交易量的增加加上出价过高可能会迫使一些人平仓，从而引发滚雪球效应。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Experts see upside</b></p><p><blockquote><b>专家看到上涨空间</b></blockquote></p><p> Lastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.</p><p><blockquote>最后，华尔街目前将Wish股票的一致目标价定为9.06美元，这表明较目前低于6美元的水平有55%的上涨潜力。尽管平均评级为中性，但即使是持怀疑态度的分析师仍然认为未来将会上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Credit Suisse’s Stephen Ju&nbsp;reduced&nbsp;his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.</p><p><blockquote>瑞信的Stephen Ju将目标价从24美元下调至19美元。在ContexLogic未能实现第二季度收入后，他下调了预测，并因客户保留率下降和使用率下降而调整了EBITDA预期。然而，分析师仍然认为未来有近200%的巨大上涨潜力。</blockquote></p><p> Citigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He&nbsp;has&nbsp;a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.</p><p><blockquote>花旗集团的尼古拉斯·琼斯则不那么乐观。他对该股给予中性评级，但预测未来股价为7.50美元，上涨潜力为23%。第二季度盈利被认为是下调价格目标的主要原因。琼斯先生还将股票表现不佳归因于公司难以维持增长，特别是由于用户流失率和广告率高于预期。</blockquote></p><p> On the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According&nbsp;to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.</p><p><blockquote>看跌方面，摩根大通和奥本海默对该股给予卖出评级，目标股价为4至5美元。根据前者的说法，由于经济重新开放，用户活动下降，以及Wish的留存和广告成本上升，是主要担忧。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/other-memes/wish-stock-what-momentum-investors-wish-to-see\">TheStreet</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/other-memes/wish-stock-what-momentum-investors-wish-to-see","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111559375","content_text":"WISH stock spiked nearly 10% in the past three days. Without company-specific news to properly justify positive momentum, the stock’s popularity may have been the catalyst.\nAfter trading poorly in the past few months, ContextLogic stock found its way higher again. On October 20 alone, shares were up 14%. Meanwhile, the ticker saw overwhelming volume of comments on Reddit, which may help to justify bullish market action.\nFigure 1: Wish logo on a box.\nAs we mentioned in previous articles, and while the stock remains near all-time lows, momentum investors might still not be too late for the party.\nExposure may have done the trick\nA likely culprit behind WISH’s brief rally was the stock’s popularity online pushing demand for shares higher. The ticker received 150% more mentions and a whopping 35,000 upvotes – understanding that correlation between comments and upticks in share price does not necessarily indicate causation. See below the top trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.\nFigure 2: Trending stocks on Reddit on October 21.\nAnother popularity tracker(see below) suggests that, in the last three months, WISH's popularity remained consistently high. However, share price had not necessarily been moving in lockstep with exposure on the discussion boards until recently. Still, it is not at all surprising that a jolt in stock price could soon follow.\nFigure 3: WISH stock sentiment on the WSB forum.\nThe correlation between online popularity and WISH’s recent performance is consistent with the SEC’s recently released report on GameStop’s trading frenzy. The rallies seen earlier in 2021 have been primarily attributed to an increase in engagement by retail investors, enabled by platforms like Reddit. The same report also questioned the hypothesis that short covering had much to do with the massive increases in share price.\nDip buying\nThis week’s bullish attack may have also been motivated by Wish stock being so close to its all-time lows. Growth in the e-commerce space has been pressured by the “beginning of the end” of the pandemic and stay-at-home tailwinds. Also, several Wall Street experts have downgraded WISH following Q2 results, undermining positive sentiment.\nThe above seems to have created a bearish wave. WISH has elevated short interest, at almost 25% of the float. Such high ratio can put short sellers in a vulnerable position: an increase in trading volume coupled with overbidding can force some to close their positions, kickstarting a snowball effect.\nExperts see upside\nLastly, Wall Street currently assigns a consensus price target of $9.06 to Wish stock, signaling impressive 55% upside potential from the current sub-$6 levels. Despite an average neutral rating, even the more skeptical analysts still see gains ahead.\nCredit Suisse’s Stephen Ju reduced his price target from $24 to $19. He adjusted projections lower after ContexLogic missed Q2 revenue and adjusted EBITDA estimates due to lower customer retention and declining usage rates. However, the analyst still sees massive upside potential of nearly 200% ahead.\nCitigroup’s Nicholas Jones is not as bullish. He has a neutral rating on the stock but forecasts $7.50 on the horizon, for 23% upside potential. Q2 earnings were cited as the key reason for a price target reduction. Mr. Jones also attributed poor stock performance to the company’s difficulty in sustaining growth, especially due to higher-than-expected user churn and ad rates.\nOn the bearish side, JPMorgan and Oppenheimer have a sell rating on the stock and $4 to $5 share price target.According to the former, decline in user activity due to the reopening of the economy, alongside Wish’s retention and rising ad costs, are the main concerns.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"WISH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1942,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":186399350,"gmtCreate":1623472094970,"gmtModify":1634032672434,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wah","listText":"Wah","text":"Wah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186399350","repostId":"1147474880","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147474880","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623470168,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147474880?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-12 11:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147474880","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless ris","content":"<p>  Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.  I’ve had it.</p><p><blockquote>了解投机和投资之间的区别对于避免鲁莽风险至关重要。我受够了。</blockquote></p><p> The Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.</p><p><blockquote>关于金融最基本的区别之一，《华尔街日报》是错误的，而且几十年来一直是错误的。我再也受不了了。</blockquote></p><p> If you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.</p><p><blockquote>如果你购买一只股票纯粹是因为它上涨了很多，而没有对其进行任何研究，那么你就不是——正如《华尔街日报》及其编辑奇怪地坚持这样称呼你的那样——“投资者”。如果你购买加密货币是因为，嘿，这听起来很有趣，你也不是投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Whenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.</p><p><blockquote>每当你购买任何金融资产是因为你有一个只是为了好玩，或者因为某个名人正在大肆宣传它，而其他人似乎也在购买它，你就不是在投资。</blockquote></p><p> You’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.</p><p><blockquote>你绝对是一个交易者：刚刚购买了一项资产的人。你可能是一个投机者：认为其他人会比你付出更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> Of course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%<i>are</i>investors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.</p><p><blockquote>当然，有些人购买像GameStopCorp.GME 5.88%这样的模因股票<i>是</i>投资者。他们阅读公司的财务报表，研究基础业务的健康状况，并了解还有谁在做空股票。同样，许多数字硬币的买家也投入了时间和精力来了解加密货币的工作原理以及它如何重塑金融。</blockquote></p><p> An investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.</p><p><blockquote>投资者依赖于内部回报来源：收益、收入、资产价值的增长。投机者依赖外部回报来源：主要是其他人是否会支付更多，而不考虑基本价值。</blockquote></p><p> The word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.</p><p><blockquote>投资者这个词来自拉丁语“investire”，意思是穿着或打扮自己，包围或包围。你永远不会在不知道衣服是什么颜色或由什么材料制成的情况下穿衣服。同样，你不能投资你一无所知的资产。</blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，《华尔街日报》及其编辑长期以来一直将几乎所有购买任何东西的人称为“投资者”。1962年7月12日，《华尔街日报》发表了经典著作《证券分析》和《聪明的投资者》的作者本杰明·格雷厄姆写给编辑的一封信。格雷厄姆抱怨说，那年6月，《华尔街日报》发表了一篇文章，标题是“许多小投资者押注进一步下跌，卖空零星股票”。</blockquote></p><p> He wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)</p><p><blockquote>他写道：“根据‘投资’的什么定义，人们可以给那些通过卖空零头在股市上下注的小人物起‘投资者’这个名字呢？”（做空奇数手就是借入并卖出少于100股的股票，押注股票会下跌——无论在当时还是现在，这都是一个昂贵且有风险的赌注。）</blockquote></p><p> “If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”</p><p><blockquote>“如果这些人是投资者，”格雷厄姆问道，“我们应该如何定义‘投机’和‘投机者’？难道目前未能区分投资和投机的做法不仅会对个人，而且会对整个金融界造成严重伤害吗——就像20世纪20年代末那样？”</blockquote></p><p> Graham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆并不是一个认为市场应该是富人专属游乐场的势利小人。他写了《聪明的投资者》，明确的目的是帮助不太富裕的人明智地参与股市。</blockquote></p><p> In that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆在那本书（本专栏就是以其命名的）中说：“彻头彻尾的投机既不违法、不道德，也（对大多数人来说）不会让钱包发胖。”</blockquote></p><p> However, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，他警告说，这会带来三种危险：“（1）当你认为自己在投资时进行投机；（2）当你缺乏适当的知识和技能时，认真地投机而不是作为一种消遣；以及（3）冒更多钱的风险投机超出了你的承受能力。”</blockquote></p><p> Most investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.</p><p><blockquote>大多数投资者每隔一段时间就会投机一点。就像彩票或偶尔去赛马场或赌场一样，一点点是无害的乐趣。很多都不是。</blockquote></p><p> If you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为你在投机时是在投资，你会将哪怕是短暂的成功归因于技能，即使运气是最可能的解释。这会导致你冒鲁莽的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Take speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.</p><p><blockquote>把投机看得太重，它会变成一种痴迷和上瘾。你变得无法接受你的损失，也无法关注未来超过几分钟。接下来你知道的是，你在篝火上投入了更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> I think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，将交易者和投机者称为“投资者”会将许多新来者推向他们不应该承担的风险和他们无法承受的损失的滑坡。我热切地希望《华尔街日报》及其编辑最终不再使用“投资者”作为任何进行交易的人的默认术语。</blockquote></p><p> “ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”</p><p><blockquote>“‘投资者’在英语中作为一个包罗万象的术语有着悠久的历史，指的是那些投入资本并期望回报的人，无论时间长短，无论他们阅读的投资专栏有多少，”《华尔街日报》财经编辑查尔斯·福雷尔在回应我的投诉时说道。“至少可以追溯到19世纪中叶，‘投资’甚至被用来描述赌马——这种活动与基本面分析的脱节程度肯定不亚于购买狗狗币。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.</p><p><blockquote>我听到了，老板，但我还是认为你错了。《华尔街日报》不可能仅仅因为字典上说我们可以，就说一个休闲赌徒在赛马场“投资”。</blockquote></p><p> Calling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.</p><p><blockquote>将新手投机者称为“投资者”是营销人员助长过度交易的最有力方式之一。</blockquote></p><p> Ina recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”</p><p><blockquote>在最近的Instagram帖子中，一位名叫拉娜·罗迪斯(Lana Rhoades)的前色情明星穿着——嗯，大部分是穿着——比基尼，举着似乎是格雷厄姆的《聪明的投资者》。据IMDb.com报道，她主演了《Tushy》和《Make Me Meow》等视频。</blockquote></p><p> In her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.</p><p><blockquote>在她被近180万人“点赞”的帖子中，罗迪斯宣布她将推广一种名为PAWGCoin的加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> The currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)</p><p><blockquote>该货币的网站称，这枚硬币是为“那些向发达的后躯致敬的人”准备的。（我得到可靠消息，PAWG代表胖屁股白人女孩。）</blockquote></p><p> PAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.</p><p><blockquote>据追踪此类数字货币的网站Poocoin.io称，自Rhoades女士6月初开始推广PAWGcoin以来，PAWGcoin已上涨约900%。</blockquote></p><p> Ms. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”</p><p><blockquote>罗迪斯女士在推特上写道“我每天早上也阅读《华尔街日报》”，但记者无法联系到她置评。PAWGcoin的网站鼓励访问者“立即投资”。</blockquote></p><p> In Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.</p><p><blockquote>在罗迪斯的Instagram帖子中，她举着一本打开的《聪明的投资者》，封面是颠倒的。她似乎是闭着眼睛读的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestor, Trader, Speculator: Which One Are You?<blockquote>投资者、交易者、投机者：你是哪一个？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Wall Street Journal</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-12 11:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.  I’ve had it.</p><p><blockquote>了解投机和投资之间的区别对于避免鲁莽风险至关重要。我受够了。</blockquote></p><p> The Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.</p><p><blockquote>关于金融最基本的区别之一，《华尔街日报》是错误的，而且几十年来一直是错误的。我再也受不了了。</blockquote></p><p> If you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.</p><p><blockquote>如果你购买一只股票纯粹是因为它上涨了很多，而没有对其进行任何研究，那么你就不是——正如《华尔街日报》及其编辑奇怪地坚持这样称呼你的那样——“投资者”。如果你购买加密货币是因为，嘿，这听起来很有趣，你也不是投资者。</blockquote></p><p> Whenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.</p><p><blockquote>每当你购买任何金融资产是因为你有一个只是为了好玩，或者因为某个名人正在大肆宣传它，而其他人似乎也在购买它，你就不是在投资。</blockquote></p><p> You’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.</p><p><blockquote>你绝对是一个交易者：刚刚购买了一项资产的人。你可能是一个投机者：认为其他人会比你付出更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> Of course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%<i>are</i>investors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.</p><p><blockquote>当然，有些人购买像GameStopCorp.GME 5.88%这样的模因股票<i>是</i>投资者。他们阅读公司的财务报表，研究基础业务的健康状况，并了解还有谁在做空股票。同样，许多数字硬币的买家也投入了时间和精力来了解加密货币的工作原理以及它如何重塑金融。</blockquote></p><p> An investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.</p><p><blockquote>投资者依赖于内部回报来源：收益、收入、资产价值的增长。投机者依赖外部回报来源：主要是其他人是否会支付更多，而不考虑基本价值。</blockquote></p><p> The word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.</p><p><blockquote>投资者这个词来自拉丁语“investire”，意思是穿着或打扮自己，包围或包围。你永远不会在不知道衣服是什么颜色或由什么材料制成的情况下穿衣服。同样，你不能投资你一无所知的资产。</blockquote></p><p> Nevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，《华尔街日报》及其编辑长期以来一直将几乎所有购买任何东西的人称为“投资者”。1962年7月12日，《华尔街日报》发表了经典著作《证券分析》和《聪明的投资者》的作者本杰明·格雷厄姆写给编辑的一封信。格雷厄姆抱怨说，那年6月，《华尔街日报》发表了一篇文章，标题是“许多小投资者押注进一步下跌，卖空零星股票”。</blockquote></p><p> He wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)</p><p><blockquote>他写道：“根据‘投资’的什么定义，人们可以给那些通过卖空零头在股市上下注的小人物起‘投资者’这个名字呢？”（做空奇数手就是借入并卖出少于100股的股票，押注股票会下跌——无论在当时还是现在，这都是一个昂贵且有风险的赌注。）</blockquote></p><p> “If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”</p><p><blockquote>“如果这些人是投资者，”格雷厄姆问道，“我们应该如何定义‘投机’和‘投机者’？难道目前未能区分投资和投机的做法不仅会对个人，而且会对整个金融界造成严重伤害吗——就像20世纪20年代末那样？”</blockquote></p><p> Graham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆并不是一个认为市场应该是富人专属游乐场的势利小人。他写了《聪明的投资者》，明确的目的是帮助不太富裕的人明智地参与股市。</blockquote></p><p> In that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”</p><p><blockquote>格雷厄姆在那本书（本专栏就是以其命名的）中说：“彻头彻尾的投机既不违法、不道德，也（对大多数人来说）不会让钱包发胖。”</blockquote></p><p> However, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”</p><p><blockquote>然而，他警告说，这会带来三种危险：“（1）当你认为自己在投资时进行投机；（2）当你缺乏适当的知识和技能时，认真地投机而不是作为一种消遣；以及（3）冒更多钱的风险投机超出了你的承受能力。”</blockquote></p><p> Most investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.</p><p><blockquote>大多数投资者每隔一段时间就会投机一点。就像彩票或偶尔去赛马场或赌场一样，一点点是无害的乐趣。很多都不是。</blockquote></p><p> If you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.</p><p><blockquote>如果你认为你在投机时是在投资，你会将哪怕是短暂的成功归因于技能，即使运气是最可能的解释。这会导致你冒鲁莽的风险。</blockquote></p><p> Take speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.</p><p><blockquote>把投机看得太重，它会变成一种痴迷和上瘾。你变得无法接受你的损失，也无法关注未来超过几分钟。接下来你知道的是，你在篝火上投入了更多的钱。</blockquote></p><p> I think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.</p><p><blockquote>我认为，将交易者和投机者称为“投资者”会将许多新来者推向他们不应该承担的风险和他们无法承受的损失的滑坡。我热切地希望《华尔街日报》及其编辑最终不再使用“投资者”作为任何进行交易的人的默认术语。</blockquote></p><p> “ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”</p><p><blockquote>“‘投资者’在英语中作为一个包罗万象的术语有着悠久的历史，指的是那些投入资本并期望回报的人，无论时间长短，无论他们阅读的投资专栏有多少，”《华尔街日报》财经编辑查尔斯·福雷尔在回应我的投诉时说道。“至少可以追溯到19世纪中叶，‘投资’甚至被用来描述赌马——这种活动与基本面分析的脱节程度肯定不亚于购买狗狗币。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> I hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.</p><p><blockquote>我听到了，老板，但我还是认为你错了。《华尔街日报》不可能仅仅因为字典上说我们可以，就说一个休闲赌徒在赛马场“投资”。</blockquote></p><p> Calling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.</p><p><blockquote>将新手投机者称为“投资者”是营销人员助长过度交易的最有力方式之一。</blockquote></p><p> Ina recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”</p><p><blockquote>在最近的Instagram帖子中，一位名叫拉娜·罗迪斯(Lana Rhoades)的前色情明星穿着——嗯，大部分是穿着——比基尼，举着似乎是格雷厄姆的《聪明的投资者》。据IMDb.com报道，她主演了《Tushy》和《Make Me Meow》等视频。</blockquote></p><p> In her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.</p><p><blockquote>在她被近180万人“点赞”的帖子中，罗迪斯宣布她将推广一种名为PAWGCoin的加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> The currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)</p><p><blockquote>该货币的网站称，这枚硬币是为“那些向发达的后躯致敬的人”准备的。（我得到可靠消息，PAWG代表胖屁股白人女孩。）</blockquote></p><p> PAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.</p><p><blockquote>据追踪此类数字货币的网站Poocoin.io称，自Rhoades女士6月初开始推广PAWGcoin以来，PAWGcoin已上涨约900%。</blockquote></p><p> Ms. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”</p><p><blockquote>罗迪斯女士在推特上写道“我每天早上也阅读《华尔街日报》”，但记者无法联系到她置评。PAWGcoin的网站鼓励访问者“立即投资”。</blockquote></p><p> In Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.</p><p><blockquote>在罗迪斯的Instagram帖子中，她举着一本打开的《聪明的投资者》，封面是颠倒的。她似乎是闭着眼睛读的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-cant-invest-without-trading-you-can-trade-without-investing-11623426213?mod=markets_lead_pos5\">The Wall Street Journal</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-cant-invest-without-trading-you-can-trade-without-investing-11623426213?mod=markets_lead_pos5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147474880","content_text":"Understanding the difference between speculation and investing is essential to avoiding reckless risk.\n\nI’ve had it.\nThe Wall Street Journal is wrong, and has remained wrong for decades, about one of the most basic distinctions in finance. And I can’t stand it anymore.\nIf you buy a stock purely because it’s gone up a lot, without doing any research on it whatsoever, you are not—as the Journal and its editors bizarrely insist on calling you—an “investor.” If you buy a cryptocurrency because, hey, that sounds like fun, you aren’t an investor either.\nWhenever you buy any financial asset becauseyou have a hunchorjust for kicks, or becausesomebody famous is hyping the heck out of itoreverybody else seems to be buying it too, you aren’t investing.\nYou’re definitely a trader: someone who has just bought an asset. And you may bea speculator: someone who thinks other people will pay more for it than you did.\nOf course,some folkswho buy meme stocks likeGameStopCorp.GME5.88%areinvestors. They read the companies’ financial statements, study the health of the underlying businesses and learn who else is betting on or against the shares. Likewise, many buyers of digital coins have put in the time and effort to understand how cryptocurrency works and how it could reshape finance.\nAn investor relies on internal sources of return: earnings, income, growth in the value of assets. A speculator counts on external sources of return: primarilywhether somebody else will pay more, regardless of fundamental value.\nThe word investor comes from the Latin “investire,” to dress in or clothe oneself, surround or envelop. You would never wear clothes without knowing what color they are or what material they’re made of. Likewise, you can’t invest in an asset you know nothing about.\nNevertheless, the Journal and its editors have long called almost everybody who buys just about anything an “investor.” On July 12, 1962, the Journal publisheda letter to the editorfrom Benjamin Graham, author of the classic books “Security Analysis” and “The Intelligent Investor.” That June, complained Graham, the Journal had run an article headlined “Many Small Investors Bet on Further Drops, Sell Odd Lots Short.”\nHe wrote: “By what definition of ‘investment’ can one give the name ‘investors’ to small people who make bets on the stock market by selling odd lots short?” (To short an odd lot is to borrow and sell fewer than 100 shares in a wager that a stock will fall—an expensive and risky bet, then and now.)\n“If these people are investors,” asked Graham, “how should one define ‘speculation’ and ‘speculators’? Isn’t it possible that the currentfailure to distinguishbetweeninvestment and speculationmay do grave harm not only to individuals but to the whole financial community—as it did in the late 1920s?”\nGraham wasn’t a snob who thought that the markets should be the exclusive playground of the rich. He wrote “The Intelligent Investor” with the express purpose of helping less-wealthy people participate wisely in the stock market.\nIn that book, after which this column is named, Graham said, “Outright speculation is neither illegal, immoral, nor (for most people) fattening to the pocketbook.”\nHowever, he warned, it creates three dangers: “(1) speculating when you think you are investing; (2) speculating seriously instead of as a pastime, when you lack proper knowledge and skill for it; and (3) risking more money in speculation than you can afford to lose.”\nMost investors speculate a bit every once in a while. Like a lottery ticket or an occasional visit to the racetrack or casino, a little is harmless fun. A lot isn’t.\nIf you think you’re investing when you’re speculating, you’ll attribute even momentary success to skill even thoughluck is the likeliest explanation. That can lead you to take reckless risks.\nTake speculating too seriously, and it turns intoan obsessionandan addiction. You become incapable of accepting your losses or focusing on the future more than a few minutes ahead. Next thing you know, you’re throwing even more money onto the bonfire.\nI think calling traders and speculators “investors” shoves many newcomers farther down the slippery slope toward risks they shouldn’t take and losses they can’t afford. I fervently hope the Journal and its editors will finally stop using “investor” as the default term for anyone who makes a trade.\n“ ‘Investor’ has a long history in the English language as a catch-all term denoting people who commit capital with the expectation of a return, no matter how long or short, no matter how many or how few investing columns they read,” WSJ Financial Editor Charles Forelle said in response to my complaints. “Back at least to the mid-19th century, ‘invest’ has even been used to describe a wager on horses—an activity surely no less divorced from fundamental analysis than a purchase of dogecoin.”\nI hear you, Boss, but I still think you’re wrong. There’s no way the Journal would say a recreational gambler is “investing” at the racetrack just because a dictionary says we can.\nCalling novice speculators “investors” is one of the most powerful ways marketers fuel excessive trading.\nIna recent Instagram post, a former porn star who goes by the name Lana Rhoades posed in—well, mostly in—a bikini, as she held up what appears to be Graham’s “The Intelligent Investor.” According to IMDb.com, she starred in such videos as “Tushy” and “Make Me Meow.”\nIn her post, which was “liked” by nearly 1.8 million people, Ms. Rhoades announced that she will be promoting a cryptocurrency calledPAWGcoin.\nThe currency’s website says the coin is meant for “those who pay homage to developed posteriors.” (PAWG, I’ve been reliably informed, stands for Phat Ass White Girl.)\nPAWGcoin is up roughly 900% since Ms. Rhoades began promoting it in early June, according to Poocoin.io, a website that tracks such digital currencies.\nMs. Rhoades, who has tweeted “I also read the WSJ every morning,” couldn’t be reached for comment. PAWGcoin’s website encourages visitors to “invest now.”\nIn Ms. Rhoades’s Instagram post, she is holding up an open copy of the “The Intelligent Investor,” whose cover is reversed. She appears to be reading it with her eyes closed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1702,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":853661158,"gmtCreate":1634801929420,"gmtModify":1634801929537,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/853661158","repostId":"1119150816","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3769,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":845070288,"gmtCreate":1636257673058,"gmtModify":1636258028427,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845070288","repostId":"2181742244","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2033,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":853663715,"gmtCreate":1634801838890,"gmtModify":1634801839007,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/853663715","repostId":"2177439820","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":859258703,"gmtCreate":1634703100111,"gmtModify":1634703137799,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859258703","repostId":"1126698054","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126698054","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634698575,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1126698054?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-20 10:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126698054","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) - Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Ch","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）——</b>忘掉格林奇吧：看起来供应链中断可能会偷走今年的圣诞节。但这些问题会在2022年初得到解决吗？</blockquote></p><p> Several retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that&nbsp;global supply chain constraints&nbsp;will lead to not only&nbsp;fewer discounts&nbsp;during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.</p><p><blockquote>多家零售商、制造商和经济学家都警告称，全球供应链限制不仅会导致假期折扣减少，还会导致商店货架上的产品可能短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些高管和市场专家认为，最糟糕的时期可能会在短短几个月内过去。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan Chase(JPM)&nbsp;CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that&nbsp;supply chain woes will be a distant memory&nbsp;by this time next year.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPM）首席执行官杰米·戴蒙（Jamie Dimon）上周在与记者举行的财报看涨期权上表示，到明年这个时候，供应链困境将成为遥远的记忆。</blockquote></p><p> \"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.</p><p><blockquote>戴蒙表示：“一年后我们很有可能根本不会谈论供应链。”</blockquote></p><p> Others note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.</p><p><blockquote>其他人指出，大公司和运输运营商也在采取措施缓解这些问题。</blockquote></p><p> Jack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as&nbsp;Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF)&nbsp;and&nbsp;Intel(INTC)&nbsp;are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.</p><p><blockquote>Natixis Investment Managers的投资组合策略师Jack Janasiewicz在一封电子邮件中指出，丰田(TM)、三星(SSNLF)和英特尔(INTC)等巨头公司正计划在今年最后几个月提高产量，部分原因是关键零部件的可用性增加。</blockquote></p><p> Major ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.</p><p><blockquote>长滩和洛杉矶等主要港口现在也希望保持全天候运营，以应对供应链瓶颈。</blockquote></p><p> \"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"</p><p><blockquote>花旗分析师克里斯蒂安·韦瑟比(Christian Wetherbee)在上周的一份报告中表示：“拥堵问题可能已经过去，流动性和交易量可能会增加。”“这在美国和亚洲港口拥堵缓解的早期迹象中显而易见。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile executives from&nbsp;Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UPS(UPS)&nbsp;met with President Joe Biden to&nbsp;try to find solutions&nbsp;for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，沃尔玛(WMT)、塔吉特(TGT)、联邦快递(FDX)和联合包裹(UPS)的高管会见了总统乔·拜登，试图为影响零售商和托运人的问题找到解决方案。</blockquote></p><p> \"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师在最近的一份报告中表示：“全球供应链已经非常薄弱。”但他们补充说，“我们可能已经目睹了最糟糕的情况”，到2022年上半年，“影响可能会缓解”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Problems may persist longer than some companies expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>问题持续的时间可能比一些公司预期的要长</b></blockquote></p><p> But it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.</p><p><blockquote>但一些公司和策略师可能过于乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Profits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.</p><p><blockquote>由于运输延误，利润可能会受到打击。人们也有理由担心，在可预见的未来，这些问题将导致价格上涨，一些消费者可能会因此推迟购买非必需品。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity&nbsp;to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，这个问题不仅仅是将海外商品运送到美国。国内卡车司机可能没有足够的能力来处理所有需要从港口到仓库和商店的产品。</blockquote></p><p> For example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate&nbsp;Danone(DANOY)&nbsp;warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.</p><p><blockquote>例如，欧洲乳制品和植物性食品集团达能(DANOY)周二在与分析师的销售看涨期权中警告称，未来价格将上涨。罪魁祸首：卡车运输相关问题。</blockquote></p><p> \"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.</p><p><blockquote>达能首席执行官于尔根·埃塞尔(Juergen Esser)表示：“我们今年（下半年）看到的通胀部分原因是运输紧张。让我们非常明确，因为我们看到美国卡车的即期运价处于创纪录水平。”财务、技术和数据官。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，埃塞尔表示，达能可能面临约7%至9%的更高运输成本。这要么最终伤害利润率较低的投资者，要么伤害消费者，他们可能会发现自己在超市为酸奶支付更多费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy some say the worst of the supply chain woes are near an end<blockquote>为什么有人说供应链最糟糕的困境即将结束</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">CNN Business</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-20 10:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>New York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?</p><p><blockquote><b>纽约（CNN商业）——</b>忘掉格林奇吧：看起来供应链中断可能会偷走今年的圣诞节。但这些问题会在2022年初得到解决吗？</blockquote></p><p> Several retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that&nbsp;global supply chain constraints&nbsp;will lead to not only&nbsp;fewer discounts&nbsp;during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.</p><p><blockquote>多家零售商、制造商和经济学家都警告称，全球供应链限制不仅会导致假期折扣减少，还会导致商店货架上的产品可能短缺。</blockquote></p><p> Still, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.</p><p><blockquote>尽管如此，一些高管和市场专家认为，最糟糕的时期可能会在短短几个月内过去。</blockquote></p><p> JPMorgan Chase(JPM)&nbsp;CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that&nbsp;supply chain woes will be a distant memory&nbsp;by this time next year.</p><p><blockquote>摩根大通（JPM）首席执行官杰米·戴蒙（Jamie Dimon）上周在与记者举行的财报看涨期权上表示，到明年这个时候，供应链困境将成为遥远的记忆。</blockquote></p><p> \"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.</p><p><blockquote>戴蒙表示：“一年后我们很有可能根本不会谈论供应链。”</blockquote></p><p> Others note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.</p><p><blockquote>其他人指出，大公司和运输运营商也在采取措施缓解这些问题。</blockquote></p><p> Jack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as&nbsp;Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF)&nbsp;and&nbsp;Intel(INTC)&nbsp;are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.</p><p><blockquote>Natixis Investment Managers的投资组合策略师Jack Janasiewicz在一封电子邮件中指出，丰田(TM)、三星(SSNLF)和英特尔(INTC)等巨头公司正计划在今年最后几个月提高产量，部分原因是关键零部件的可用性增加。</blockquote></p><p> Major ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.</p><p><blockquote>长滩和洛杉矶等主要港口现在也希望保持全天候运营，以应对供应链瓶颈。</blockquote></p><p> \"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"</p><p><blockquote>花旗分析师克里斯蒂安·韦瑟比(Christian Wetherbee)在上周的一份报告中表示：“拥堵问题可能已经过去，流动性和交易量可能会增加。”“这在美国和亚洲港口拥堵缓解的早期迹象中显而易见。”</blockquote></p><p> Meanwhile executives from&nbsp;Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UPS(UPS)&nbsp;met with President Joe Biden to&nbsp;try to find solutions&nbsp;for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.</p><p><blockquote>与此同时，沃尔玛(WMT)、塔吉特(TGT)、联邦快递(FDX)和联合包裹(UPS)的高管会见了总统乔·拜登，试图为影响零售商和托运人的问题找到解决方案。</blockquote></p><p> \"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.</p><p><blockquote>杰富瑞(Jefferies)分析师在最近的一份报告中表示：“全球供应链已经非常薄弱。”但他们补充说，“我们可能已经目睹了最糟糕的情况”，到2022年上半年，“影响可能会缓解”。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Problems may persist longer than some companies expect</b></p><p><blockquote><b>问题持续的时间可能比一些公司预期的要长</b></blockquote></p><p> But it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.</p><p><blockquote>但一些公司和策略师可能过于乐观。</blockquote></p><p> Profits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.</p><p><blockquote>由于运输延误，利润可能会受到打击。人们也有理由担心，在可预见的未来，这些问题将导致价格上涨，一些消费者可能会因此推迟购买非必需品。</blockquote></p><p> What's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity&nbsp;to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.</p><p><blockquote>更重要的是，这个问题不仅仅是将海外商品运送到美国。国内卡车司机可能没有足够的能力来处理所有需要从港口到仓库和商店的产品。</blockquote></p><p> For example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate&nbsp;Danone(DANOY)&nbsp;warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.</p><p><blockquote>例如，欧洲乳制品和植物性食品集团达能(DANOY)周二在与分析师的销售看涨期权中警告称，未来价格将上涨。罪魁祸首：卡车运输相关问题。</blockquote></p><p> \"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.</p><p><blockquote>达能首席执行官于尔根·埃塞尔(Juergen Esser)表示：“我们今年（下半年）看到的通胀部分原因是运输紧张。让我们非常明确，因为我们看到美国卡车的即期运价处于创纪录水平。”财务、技术和数据官。</blockquote></p><p> With that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.</p><p><blockquote>考虑到这一点，埃塞尔表示，达能可能面临约7%至9%的更高运输成本。这要么最终伤害利润率较低的投资者，要么伤害消费者，他们可能会发现自己在超市为酸奶支付更多费用。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/supply-chain-economy/index.html\">CNN Business</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/19/investing/supply-chain-economy/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126698054","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Forget about The Grinch: It looks likesupply chain disruptionsmay steal Christmas this year. But will these problems be resolved by early 2022?\nSeveral retailers, manufacturers and economists have all warned that global supply chain constraints will lead to not only fewer discounts during the holidays but also result in a potential dearth of products on store shelves.\nStill, some executives and market experts think the worst may be over in just a few months.\nJPMorgan Chase(JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said during an earnings call with reporters last week that supply chain woes will be a distant memory by this time next year.\n\"There's a very good chance that a year from now that we won't be talking about supply chains at all,\" Dimon said.\nOthers note that major companies and transportation operators are also taking steps to alleviate the problems.\nJack Janasiewicz, a portfolio strategist at Natixis Investment Managers, pointed out in an email that giant companies such as Toyota(TM),Samsung(SSNLF) and Intel(INTC) are planning to ramp up output during the final few months of the year, in part due to increased availability of key components.\nMajor ports such as Long Beach and Los Angeles are also now looking to keep their operations open 24/7 to deal with supply chain bottlenecks.\n\"Congestion issues may be past peak, with the potential for greater fluidity and volume on the horizon,\" Citi analyst Christian Wetherbee said in a report last week. \"This is evident in early signs of decongestion at ports in the US and Asia.\"\nMeanwhile executives from Walmart(WMT),Target(TGT),FedEx(FDX) and UPS(UPS) met with President Joe Biden to try to find solutions for the problems impacting retailers and shippers.\n\"The global supply chain has been stretched remarkably thin,\" analysts at Jefferies said in a recent report. But they added that \"we may be already witnessing the worst of it,\" and the \"impact is likely to ease\" by the first half of 2022.\nProblems may persist longer than some companies expect\nBut it's possible some companies and strategists are being too optimistic.\nProfits could take a hit due to shipping delays. There are also legitimate worries that the problems will lead to higher prices for the foreseeable future — and that some consumers may delay purchases of non-essential items as a result.\nWhat's more, the issue isn't just about shipping overseas goods to the United States.Domestic truckers may not have enough capacity to handle all the products that need to go from ports to warehouses and stores.\nFor example, European dairy and plant-based food conglomerate Danone(DANOY) warned of higher prices ahead in a sales call with analysts Tuesday. The main culprit: trucking-related issues.\n\"Part of the inflation we are seeing in the [second half] of this year is because of the transportation tensions. Let's be extremely clear because we see spot rates for trucks in the US at a record level,\" said Juergen Esser, Danone's chief financial, technology and data officer.\nWith that in mind, Esser said Danone could face higher transportation costs of about 7% to 9%. That will either wind up hurting investors with lower margins, or hurting consumers, who may find themselves paying more for yogurt at the supermarket.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2579,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":850456319,"gmtCreate":1634619564375,"gmtModify":1634619727479,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850456319","repostId":"1130016296","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130016296","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1634613697,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1130016296?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 11:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130016296","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.\n\nLei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor'","content":"<p>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/624e5188afd65ef1997deb92ab8d99a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Lei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.</p><p><blockquote>小米集团董事长雷军今日在投资者日宣布，小米造车进度和团队各项工作远超他预期。预计小米汽车将在2024年上半年正式量产。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8a6580e1de3271305368459ed0163e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong<blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-10-19 11:21</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.</p><p><blockquote>小米股价在香港飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/624e5188afd65ef1997deb92ab8d99a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> Lei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.</p><p><blockquote>小米集团董事长雷军今日在投资者日宣布，小米造车进度和团队各项工作远超他预期。预计小米汽车将在2024年上半年正式量产。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be8a6580e1de3271305368459ed0163e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"01810":"小米集团-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1130016296","content_text":"Xiaomi shares surged 5% in Hong Kong.\n\nLei Jun, chairman of Xiaomi group, announced on the investor's day today that the progress of Xiaomi's car making and various work of the team far exceeded his expectations. It is expected that Xiaomi's car will be officially mass produced in the first half of 2024.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"01810":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2006,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":186304301,"gmtCreate":1623471968603,"gmtModify":1634032674722,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wahxjssjjskskax","listText":"Wahxjssjjskskax","text":"Wahxjssjjskskax","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/186304301","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2462,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":845070023,"gmtCreate":1636257600834,"gmtModify":1636257600834,"author":{"id":"3570504799814298","authorId":"3570504799814298","name":"glenn98","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1ef40446851bcb0907711ba3c1eead8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570504799814298","authorIdStr":"3570504799814298"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FERN\">$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$</a>z","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FERN\">$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$</a>z","text":"$Fernhill Corp.(FERN)$z","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f50e4aec8e02af32463c846b02a9924a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/845070023","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2388,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}