Rhythm88的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Rhythm88

Rhythm88

Rhythm in Invest&Trade safely!

IP属地：未知

39关注

3粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-10-19

Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-26

Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday and Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-10

Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-10-19

There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?

Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>

2021-08-01

Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-02-26

Let’s see whether NIO will power pass Li Performance. This is key for EV China stocks reversal up again. I think.

Why NIO Stock Dropped Thursday<blockquote>为什么蔚来股价周四下跌</blockquote>

2021-04-02

Economy booming will lead to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-03-27

Below $70 will be a v good buy!

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-02

If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and crypto? ..

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-04-01

Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3565560262275157","uuid":"3565560262275157","gmtCreate":1602486867860,"gmtModify":1613632472748,"name":"Rhythm88","pinyin":"rhythm88","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"Rhythm in Invest&Trade safely!","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":39,"tweetSize":50,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.22","exceedPercentage":"93.72%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.09%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":850449540,"gmtCreate":1634620172911,"gmtModify":1634620173032,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !&nbsp;","listText":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !&nbsp;","text":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850449540","repostId":"1123286896","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2287,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":850466277,"gmtCreate":1634617935540,"gmtModify":1634617936051,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis&nbsp;is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar&nbsp;retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?&nbsp;","listText":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis&nbsp;is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar&nbsp;retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?&nbsp;","text":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850466277","repostId":"1147398025","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"<p>Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.</p><p><blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).</p><p><blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote></p><p> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).</p><p><blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote></p><p> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.</p><p><blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote></p><p> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.</p><p><blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.</p><p><blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote></p><p> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.</p><p><blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote></p><p> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.</p><p><blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote></p><p> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”</p><p><blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote></p><p> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”</p><p><blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote></p><p> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.</p><p><blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-19 09:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.</p><p><blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).</p><p><blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote></p><p> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).</p><p><blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote></p><p> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.</p><p><blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote></p><p> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.</p><p><blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.</p><p><blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote></p><p> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.</p><p><blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote></p><p> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.</p><p><blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote></p><p> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”</p><p><blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote></p><p> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”</p><p><blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote></p><p> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.</p><p><blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","LI":"理想汽车","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","TM":"丰田汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TM":0.9,"01211":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"GM":0.9,"LI":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3031,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":802751780,"gmtCreate":1627812029140,"gmtModify":1633756180858,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"To hold or to sell ? Long run is still a very good company to invest on.&nbsp;","listText":"To hold or to sell ? Long run is still a very good company to invest on.&nbsp;","text":"To hold or to sell ? Long run is still a very good company to invest on.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802751780","repostId":"2156166889","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1777,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802759510,"gmtCreate":1627811897930,"gmtModify":1631885102334,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks&nbsp;","listText":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks&nbsp;","text":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802759510","repostId":"1147877145","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1952,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177401825,"gmtCreate":1627256144867,"gmtModify":1633766918719,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday &nbsp;and&nbsp;Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","listText":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday &nbsp;and&nbsp;Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","text":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday and Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/177401825","repostId":"1100772026","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3057,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148960104,"gmtCreate":1625917028108,"gmtModify":1633936129495,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.&nbsp;","listText":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.&nbsp;","text":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148960104","repostId":"1101087642","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372595139,"gmtCreate":1619225981621,"gmtModify":1634287656780,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"AMD is still&nbsp;leading in future growth as compare to intel as of now unless intel can transform quicker. Based on the analysis here, seem like AMD is a much better long term investment&nbsp;","listText":"AMD is still&nbsp;leading in future growth as compare to intel as of now unless intel can transform quicker. Based on the analysis here, seem like AMD is a much better long term investment&nbsp;","text":"AMD is still leading in future growth as compare to intel as of now unless intel can transform quicker. Based on the analysis here, seem like AMD is a much better long term investment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/372595139","repostId":"1180713929","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180713929","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619191972,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1180713929?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-23 23:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMD Stock Popped After Intel's Earnings Beat<blockquote>为什么英特尔盈利超出预期后AMD股价上涨</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180713929","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Here's a hint: It's not because Intel reported great news.What happenedShares of rising Intel (NASDA","content":"<p>Here's a hint: It's not because Intel reported great news.</p><p><blockquote>这里有一个提示：这并不是因为英特尔报道了好消息。</blockquote></p><p><b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p>Shares of rising&nbsp;<b>Intel</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:INTC)&nbsp;rival and fellow&nbsp;semiconductors&nbsp;giant&nbsp;<b>Advanced Micro Devices</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:AMD)&nbsp;popped in early trading on the Nasdaq Friday, the first day afterIntel's disappointing Q1 2021 earnings report. AMD's shares were up 4.5% as of 11:30 a.m. EDT.</p><p><blockquote>瑞星股份<b>英特尔</b>（纳斯达克：INTC）竞争对手和半导体巨头<b>先进微设备公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMD）周五在纳斯达克早盘交易中上涨，这是英特尔发布令人失望的2021年第一季度收益报告的第一天。截至美国东部时间上午11:30，AMD股价上涨4.5%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/368e9bc79febd0164dab4a88ffd13c42\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf04377bf945cfdaa9a52157bb5560f7\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p>Intel, if you haven't heard, actually&nbsp;beat&nbsp;on its Q1 earnings. Despite sales declining 1% year over year, the company managed to report a pro forma profit of $1.39 per share, which was ahead of analyst expectations.</p><p><blockquote>如果您还没有听说过，英特尔第一季度的盈利实际上超出了预期。尽管销售额同比下降1%，但该公司仍报告预计每股利润为1.39美元，超出分析师预期。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Intel reported a steep 540 basis point decline in its gross margin to 55.2%, and it saw its operating margin cut nearly in half as the company spent heavily to race to catch up to its rivals in advanced computer chips. Analysts at Citigroup commented yesterday that Intel stock appears to be close to its peak valuation and is likely to decline as investors acclimate to the new environment in which Intel is losing, not gaining, market share.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，英特尔报告称其毛利率大幅下降540个基点至55.2%，并且由于该公司斥巨资追赶先进计算机芯片领域的竞争对手，其营业利润率几乎减半。花旗集团分析师昨日评论称，英特尔股价似乎已接近其估值峰值，随着投资者适应英特尔正在失去而非获得市场份额的新环境，英特尔股价可能会下跌。</blockquote></p><p>And the reason this is good news for&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;is that, according to Citi at least, it's AMD that's taking that market share away from Intel.</p><p><blockquote>这对AMD来说是个好消息的原因是，至少根据花旗的说法，AMD正在从英特尔手中夺走市场份额。</blockquote></p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p>So what's an investor to do with all this information?</p><p><blockquote>那么投资者如何处理所有这些信息呢？</blockquote></p><p>At a valuation of just 13.6 times trailing earnings, Intel stock certainly looks like a relative bargain when compared with AMD stock, which trades at 38.4 times earnings. But AMD has acash-rich balance sheet, versus Intel that's carrying $13.5 billion in net debt. And analysts see Intel's earnings growing only 10% annually over the next five years, while AMD is pegged for 29.5% annualized earnings growth, according toS&amp;P Global Market Intelligencedata.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔股票的市盈率仅为13.6倍，与AMD股票的市盈率为38.4倍相比，英特尔股票看起来确实相对便宜。但AMD的资产负债表现金充裕，而英特尔的净债务为135亿美元。根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，分析师预计英特尔未来五年的盈利年增长率仅为10%，而AMD的年化盈利增长率预计为29.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Intel may&nbsp;look&nbsp;like&nbsp;a value stockright now, but it's AMD that's gotall the momentum.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔现在可能看起来像一只价值股，但拥有所有动力的是AMD。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMD Stock Popped After Intel's Earnings Beat<blockquote>为什么英特尔盈利超出预期后AMD股价上涨</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMD Stock Popped After Intel's Earnings Beat<blockquote>为什么英特尔盈利超出预期后AMD股价上涨</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-23 23:32</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Here's a hint: It's not because Intel reported great news.</p><p><blockquote>这里有一个提示：这并不是因为英特尔报道了好消息。</blockquote></p><p><b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p>Shares of rising&nbsp;<b>Intel</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:INTC)&nbsp;rival and fellow&nbsp;semiconductors&nbsp;giant&nbsp;<b>Advanced Micro Devices</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:AMD)&nbsp;popped in early trading on the Nasdaq Friday, the first day afterIntel's disappointing Q1 2021 earnings report. AMD's shares were up 4.5% as of 11:30 a.m. EDT.</p><p><blockquote>瑞星股份<b>英特尔</b>（纳斯达克：INTC）竞争对手和半导体巨头<b>先进微设备公司</b>（纳斯达克：AMD）周五在纳斯达克早盘交易中上涨，这是英特尔发布令人失望的2021年第一季度收益报告的第一天。截至美国东部时间上午11:30，AMD股价上涨4.5%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/368e9bc79febd0164dab4a88ffd13c42\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf04377bf945cfdaa9a52157bb5560f7\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p><b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p>Intel, if you haven't heard, actually&nbsp;beat&nbsp;on its Q1 earnings. Despite sales declining 1% year over year, the company managed to report a pro forma profit of $1.39 per share, which was ahead of analyst expectations.</p><p><blockquote>如果您还没有听说过，英特尔第一季度的盈利实际上超出了预期。尽管销售额同比下降1%，但该公司仍报告预计每股利润为1.39美元，超出分析师预期。</blockquote></p><p>Regardless, Intel reported a steep 540 basis point decline in its gross margin to 55.2%, and it saw its operating margin cut nearly in half as the company spent heavily to race to catch up to its rivals in advanced computer chips. Analysts at Citigroup commented yesterday that Intel stock appears to be close to its peak valuation and is likely to decline as investors acclimate to the new environment in which Intel is losing, not gaining, market share.</p><p><blockquote>无论如何，英特尔报告称其毛利率大幅下降540个基点至55.2%，并且由于该公司斥巨资追赶先进计算机芯片领域的竞争对手，其营业利润率几乎减半。花旗集团分析师昨日评论称，英特尔股价似乎已接近其估值峰值，随着投资者适应英特尔正在失去而非获得市场份额的新环境，英特尔股价可能会下跌。</blockquote></p><p>And the reason this is good news for&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;is that, according to Citi at least, it's AMD that's taking that market share away from Intel.</p><p><blockquote>这对AMD来说是个好消息的原因是，至少根据花旗的说法，AMD正在从英特尔手中夺走市场份额。</blockquote></p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p>So what's an investor to do with all this information?</p><p><blockquote>那么投资者如何处理所有这些信息呢？</blockquote></p><p>At a valuation of just 13.6 times trailing earnings, Intel stock certainly looks like a relative bargain when compared with AMD stock, which trades at 38.4 times earnings. But AMD has acash-rich balance sheet, versus Intel that's carrying $13.5 billion in net debt. And analysts see Intel's earnings growing only 10% annually over the next five years, while AMD is pegged for 29.5% annualized earnings growth, according toS&amp;P Global Market Intelligencedata.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔股票的市盈率仅为13.6倍，与AMD股票的市盈率为38.4倍相比，英特尔股票看起来确实相对便宜。但AMD的资产负债表现金充裕，而英特尔的净债务为135亿美元。根据标准普尔全球市场情报数据，分析师预计英特尔未来五年的盈利年增长率仅为10%，而AMD的年化盈利增长率预计为29.5%。</blockquote></p><p>Intel may&nbsp;look&nbsp;like&nbsp;a value stockright now, but it's AMD that's gotall the momentum.</p><p><blockquote>英特尔现在可能看起来像一只价值股，但拥有所有动力的是AMD。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","INTC":"英特尔"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180713929","content_text":"Here's a hint: It's not because Intel reported great news.What happenedShares of rising Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) rival and fellow semiconductors giant Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) popped in early trading on the Nasdaq Friday, the first day afterIntel's disappointing Q1 2021 earnings report. AMD's shares were up 4.5% as of 11:30 a.m. EDT.So whatIntel, if you haven't heard, actually beat on its Q1 earnings. Despite sales declining 1% year over year, the company managed to report a pro forma profit of $1.39 per share, which was ahead of analyst expectations.Regardless, Intel reported a steep 540 basis point decline in its gross margin to 55.2%, and it saw its operating margin cut nearly in half as the company spent heavily to race to catch up to its rivals in advanced computer chips. Analysts at Citigroup commented yesterday that Intel stock appears to be close to its peak valuation and is likely to decline as investors acclimate to the new environment in which Intel is losing, not gaining, market share.And the reason this is good news for AMD is that, according to Citi at least, it's AMD that's taking that market share away from Intel.Now whatSo what's an investor to do with all this information?At a valuation of just 13.6 times trailing earnings, Intel stock certainly looks like a relative bargain when compared with AMD stock, which trades at 38.4 times earnings. But AMD has acash-rich balance sheet, versus Intel that's carrying $13.5 billion in net debt. And analysts see Intel's earnings growing only 10% annually over the next five years, while AMD is pegged for 29.5% annualized earnings growth, according toS&P Global Market Intelligencedata.Intel may look like a value stockright now, but it's AMD that's gotall the momentum.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":345159576,"gmtCreate":1618290546995,"gmtModify":1631884063052,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"They hv the advantage of 17 years of developing the algorithm that meet their&nbsp;government needs! And no one else is able or been able to do it ..!!&nbsp;","listText":"They hv the advantage of 17 years of developing the algorithm that meet their&nbsp;government needs! And no one else is able or been able to do it ..!!&nbsp;","text":"They hv the advantage of 17 years of developing the algorithm that meet their government needs! And no one else is able or been able to do it ..!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/345159576","repostId":"1192643222","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2097,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340876399,"gmtCreate":1617379857011,"gmtModify":1634521166394,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Crash is opportunity. 危机！","listText":"Crash is opportunity. 危机！","text":"Crash is opportunity. 危机！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340876399","repostId":"1191998262","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191998262","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617366158,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1191998262?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-02 20:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Likely Is a Stock Market Crash?<blockquote>股市崩盘的可能性有多大？</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191998262","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"You may not like the answer.\n\nFor the past year, investors have enjoyed one of the greatest bounce-b","content":"<p>  You may not like the answer.  For the past year, investors have enjoyed one of the greatest bounce-back rallies of all time. After the benchmark<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)lost a third of its value in mere weeks due to unprecedented uncertainties surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, it bounced back to gain in the neighborhood of 75% off its lows. You could rightly say that patience has paid off.</p><p><blockquote>你可能不喜欢这个答案。在过去的一年里，投资者享受了有史以来最大的反弹之一。基准后<b>标普500</b>由于围绕冠状病毒大流行的前所未有的不确定性，(SNPINDEX：^GSPC)在短短几周内就损失了三分之一的价值，但随后反弹至较低点上涨了75%左右。你可以正确地说，耐心得到了回报。</blockquote></p><p> But there's another reality that investors -- especially long-term investors -- are keenly aware of: the propensity of the stock market to crash or correct. Things might look great now, but the next big nosedive is always waiting in the wings.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者——尤其是长期投资者——敏锐地意识到了另一个现实：股市崩盘或调整的倾向。现在情况可能看起来很好，但下一次大幅暴跌总是在等待。</blockquote></p><p> It begs the question: How likely is astock market crash? Let's take a closer look.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了一个问题：股市崩盘的可能性有多大？让我们仔细看看。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Double-digit declines occur every 1.87 years, on average</b></p><p><blockquote><b>平均每1.87年出现两位数的下降</b></blockquote></p><p> To begin with the basics, stock market corrections (i.e., declines of at least 10%) are quite common in the S&amp;P 500. According to data from market analytics firm Yardeni Research, there have been 38 corrections in the S&amp;P 500 since the beginning of 1950. This works out to an average double-digit decline in the benchmark indexevery 1.87 years. Since it's now been more than a year since the market hit its bear-market bottom, the averages are certainly not in investors' favor.</p><p><blockquote>首先，股市调整（即至少下跌10%）在标普500中很常见。根据市场分析公司Yardeni Research的数据，自1950年初以来，标普500已经出现了38次回调。这意味着基准指数平均每1.87年下降两位数。由于距离市场触及熊市底部已经一年多了，平均水平肯定不会受到投资者的青睐。</blockquote></p><p> However, averages are nothing more than that... averages. The market doesn't adhere to averages, even if some folks base their investments off of what's happened historically.</p><p><blockquote>然而，平均值不过如此...平均值。市场并不遵循平均水平，即使有些人根据历史上发生的事情进行投资。</blockquote></p><p> We could enter a period similar to 1991 through 1996 where there were zero corrections. Or we could continue the theme since the beginning of 2010, where corrections occur, on average, every 19 months.</p><p><blockquote>我们可能会进入一个类似于1991年到1996年的时期，那里的修正为零。或者我们可以延续2010年初以来的主题，平均每19个月就会出现一次修正。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Corrections have been an historical given within three years of a bear market bottom</b></p><p><blockquote><b>在熊市触底后的三年内，调整是历史性的</b></blockquote></p><p> Another interesting piece of evidence to examine is the frequency by which the S&amp;P 500 corrects after hitting a bear-market bottom.</p><p><blockquote>另一个值得研究的有趣证据是标普500在触及熊市底部后修正的频率。</blockquote></p><p> Since the beginning of 1960 (an arbitrary year I chose for the sake of simplicity), the widely followed index has navigated its way through nine bear markets, including the coronavirus crash. In rebounding from each of the previous eight bear market lows, there was at least one double-digit percentage decline within three years100% of the time. In aggregate, 13 corrections have occurred within three years following the last eight bear market bottoms (i.e., either one or two following each bottom).</p><p><blockquote>自1960年初（为了简单起见，我随意选择了一年）以来，这个广受关注的指数已经经历了九次熊市，包括冠状病毒崩盘。在从之前八次熊市低点反弹的过程中，100%的情况下，三年内至少有一次两位数的百分比下跌。在过去八次熊市底部之后的三年内，总共发生了13次调整（即每次底部之后都有一次或两次）。</blockquote></p><p> Put another way, rebounding from a bear-market bottom is rarely a straight-line move higher. Yet up, up, and away has pretty much been the theme for investors since March 23, 2020. History would suggest that there's a very good chance of a move lower in equities within the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说，从熊市底部反弹很少是直线走高。然而，自2020年3月23日以来，上涨、上涨和离开几乎一直是投资者的主题。历史表明，未来两年内股市很有可能走低。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Crashes frequently occur when this valuation metric is hit</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当达到这个估值指标时，经常会发生崩溃</b></blockquote></p><p> But the most damning bit of evidence might just be the S&amp;P 500's Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. This is a valuation metric that examines the average inflation-adjusted earnings from the previous 10 years. You might also know it as the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE.</p><p><blockquote>但最确凿的证据可能是标普500的席勒市盈率（P/E）。这是一个估值指标，考察过去10年经通胀调整后的平均收益。你可能也知道它是周期性调整市盈率，或CAPE。</blockquote></p><p> As of the close of business on March 30, the S&amp;P 500's Shiller P/E ratio hit 35.61. That's well over double its 150-year average of 16.8. Using continuous bull market moves as a parameter, it's the second-highest reading in its history.</p><p><blockquote>截至3月30日收盘，标普500的席勒市盈率达到35.61。这是150年来平均水平16.8的两倍多。以持续的牛市走势为参数，这是其历史上第二高的读数。</blockquote></p><p> To some extent, itmakes sensethat equity valuations should be higher now than they've been historically. That's because interest rates are near an all-time low and access to the internet has effectively broken down barriers between Wall Street and Main Street that may have, in the past, kept P/E multiples at bay.</p><p><blockquote>在某种程度上，现在的股票估值应该高于历史水平是有道理的。这是因为利率接近历史低点，而且互联网接入有效地打破了华尔街和主街之间的障碍，这些障碍在过去可能会阻碍市盈率倍数。</blockquote></p><p> However, previous instances of the S&amp;P 500's Shiller P/E ratio crossing above and sustaining the 30 levelhaven't ended well. In the prior four instances where the Shiller P/E surpassed and held above 30, the benchmark index tumbled anywhere from 20% to as much as 89%. Although an 89% plunge, which was experienced during the Great Depression, is very unlikely these days, a big drop has historically been in the cards when valuations get extended, as they are now.</p><p><blockquote>然而，此前标普500席勒市盈率突破并维持在30水平的情况并没有得到很好的结局。在之前四次席勒市盈率超过并保持在30以上的情况下，基准指数下跌了20%至89%。尽管如今不太可能出现大萧条期间经历的89%的暴跌，但从历史上看，当估值延长时，就有可能出现大幅下跌，就像现在一样。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Keep that cash handy in the event that opportunity knocks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>将现金放在手边，以防机会来袭</b></blockquote></p><p> To circle back to the original question at hand, the data is pretty clear that the likelihood of a stock market crash or correction has grown considerably. It's impossible to precisely predict when a crash might occur, how long the decline will last, or how steep the drop could be. But the data strongly suggests that downside is in the offing.</p><p><blockquote>回到手头的最初问题，数据非常清楚地表明，股市崩盘或调整的可能性已经大大增加。不可能准确预测崩盘何时可能发生，下跌将持续多长时间，或者下跌幅度有多大。但数据强烈表明下行趋势即将到来。</blockquote></p><p> While this might be a disappointing revelation to some investors, it shouldn't be. Crashes and corrections are a normal part of the investing cycle. More importantly, theyprovide an opportunityfor investors to buy into great companies at a discount. Just think about all the great companies you're probably kicking yourself over for not buying last March.</p><p><blockquote>虽然这对一些投资者来说可能是一个令人失望的发现，但事实并非如此。崩盘和调整是投资周期的正常部分。更重要的是，它们为投资者提供了以折扣价购买伟大公司的机会。想想去年三月你可能会因为没有购买而自责的所有伟大公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The reason to be excited about crashes and corrections is also found in the data. You see, of those 38 previous corrections in the S&amp;P 500 since the beginning of 1950, each and every one has eventually been put into the rearview mirror by a bull market rally. Plus,at no point over the past centuryhave rolling 20-year total returns (including dividends) for the S&amp;P 500 been negative.</p><p><blockquote>对崩溃和修正感到兴奋的原因也可以在数据中找到。你看，自1950年初以来的38次标普500调整中，每一次最终都被牛市反弹抛到了后视镜中。此外，在过去的一个世纪里，标普500的20年滚动总回报率（包括股息）从未为负。</blockquote></p><p> If you need further encouragement to buy during a correction, keep in mind that 24 of the 38 double-digit declines in the S&amp;P 500 havefound their bottom in 104 or fewer calendar days(3.5 months or less). Crashes and corrections may be steep at times but tend to resolve quickly. That's your cue to have cash at the ready in the event that opportunity knocks.</p><p><blockquote>如果您在调整期间需要进一步鼓励买入，请记住，标普500 38次两位数下跌中有24次是在104个或更短的日历日（3.5个月或更短）内触底的。崩溃和修正有时可能很剧烈，但往往会很快解决。这是你在机会来临时准备好现金的提示。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Likely Is a Stock Market Crash?<blockquote>股市崩盘的可能性有多大？</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Likely Is a Stock Market Crash?<blockquote>股市崩盘的可能性有多大？</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-02 20:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  You may not like the answer.  For the past year, investors have enjoyed one of the greatest bounce-back rallies of all time. After the benchmark<b>S&amp;P 500</b>(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)lost a third of its value in mere weeks due to unprecedented uncertainties surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, it bounced back to gain in the neighborhood of 75% off its lows. You could rightly say that patience has paid off.</p><p><blockquote>你可能不喜欢这个答案。在过去的一年里，投资者享受了有史以来最大的反弹之一。基准后<b>标普500</b>由于围绕冠状病毒大流行的前所未有的不确定性，(SNPINDEX：^GSPC)在短短几周内就损失了三分之一的价值，但随后反弹至较低点上涨了75%左右。你可以正确地说，耐心得到了回报。</blockquote></p><p> But there's another reality that investors -- especially long-term investors -- are keenly aware of: the propensity of the stock market to crash or correct. Things might look great now, but the next big nosedive is always waiting in the wings.</p><p><blockquote>但投资者——尤其是长期投资者——敏锐地意识到了另一个现实：股市崩盘或调整的倾向。现在情况可能看起来很好，但下一次大幅暴跌总是在等待。</blockquote></p><p> It begs the question: How likely is astock market crash? Let's take a closer look.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了一个问题：股市崩盘的可能性有多大？让我们仔细看看。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Double-digit declines occur every 1.87 years, on average</b></p><p><blockquote><b>平均每1.87年出现两位数的下降</b></blockquote></p><p> To begin with the basics, stock market corrections (i.e., declines of at least 10%) are quite common in the S&amp;P 500. According to data from market analytics firm Yardeni Research, there have been 38 corrections in the S&amp;P 500 since the beginning of 1950. This works out to an average double-digit decline in the benchmark indexevery 1.87 years. Since it's now been more than a year since the market hit its bear-market bottom, the averages are certainly not in investors' favor.</p><p><blockquote>首先，股市调整（即至少下跌10%）在标普500中很常见。根据市场分析公司Yardeni Research的数据，自1950年初以来，标普500已经出现了38次回调。这意味着基准指数平均每1.87年下降两位数。由于距离市场触及熊市底部已经一年多了，平均水平肯定不会受到投资者的青睐。</blockquote></p><p> However, averages are nothing more than that... averages. The market doesn't adhere to averages, even if some folks base their investments off of what's happened historically.</p><p><blockquote>然而，平均值不过如此...平均值。市场并不遵循平均水平，即使有些人根据历史上发生的事情进行投资。</blockquote></p><p> We could enter a period similar to 1991 through 1996 where there were zero corrections. Or we could continue the theme since the beginning of 2010, where corrections occur, on average, every 19 months.</p><p><blockquote>我们可能会进入一个类似于1991年到1996年的时期，那里的修正为零。或者我们可以延续2010年初以来的主题，平均每19个月就会出现一次修正。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Corrections have been an historical given within three years of a bear market bottom</b></p><p><blockquote><b>在熊市触底后的三年内，调整是历史性的</b></blockquote></p><p> Another interesting piece of evidence to examine is the frequency by which the S&amp;P 500 corrects after hitting a bear-market bottom.</p><p><blockquote>另一个值得研究的有趣证据是标普500在触及熊市底部后修正的频率。</blockquote></p><p> Since the beginning of 1960 (an arbitrary year I chose for the sake of simplicity), the widely followed index has navigated its way through nine bear markets, including the coronavirus crash. In rebounding from each of the previous eight bear market lows, there was at least one double-digit percentage decline within three years100% of the time. In aggregate, 13 corrections have occurred within three years following the last eight bear market bottoms (i.e., either one or two following each bottom).</p><p><blockquote>自1960年初（为了简单起见，我随意选择了一年）以来，这个广受关注的指数已经经历了九次熊市，包括冠状病毒崩盘。在从之前八次熊市低点反弹的过程中，100%的情况下，三年内至少有一次两位数的百分比下跌。在过去八次熊市底部之后的三年内，总共发生了13次调整（即每次底部之后都有一次或两次）。</blockquote></p><p> Put another way, rebounding from a bear-market bottom is rarely a straight-line move higher. Yet up, up, and away has pretty much been the theme for investors since March 23, 2020. History would suggest that there's a very good chance of a move lower in equities within the next two years.</p><p><blockquote>换句话说，从熊市底部反弹很少是直线走高。然而，自2020年3月23日以来，上涨、上涨和离开几乎一直是投资者的主题。历史表明，未来两年内股市很有可能走低。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Crashes frequently occur when this valuation metric is hit</b></p><p><blockquote><b>当达到这个估值指标时，经常会发生崩溃</b></blockquote></p><p> But the most damning bit of evidence might just be the S&amp;P 500's Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. This is a valuation metric that examines the average inflation-adjusted earnings from the previous 10 years. You might also know it as the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE.</p><p><blockquote>但最确凿的证据可能是标普500的席勒市盈率（P/E）。这是一个估值指标，考察过去10年经通胀调整后的平均收益。你可能也知道它是周期性调整市盈率，或CAPE。</blockquote></p><p> As of the close of business on March 30, the S&amp;P 500's Shiller P/E ratio hit 35.61. That's well over double its 150-year average of 16.8. Using continuous bull market moves as a parameter, it's the second-highest reading in its history.</p><p><blockquote>截至3月30日收盘，标普500的席勒市盈率达到35.61。这是150年来平均水平16.8的两倍多。以持续的牛市走势为参数，这是其历史上第二高的读数。</blockquote></p><p> To some extent, itmakes sensethat equity valuations should be higher now than they've been historically. That's because interest rates are near an all-time low and access to the internet has effectively broken down barriers between Wall Street and Main Street that may have, in the past, kept P/E multiples at bay.</p><p><blockquote>在某种程度上，现在的股票估值应该高于历史水平是有道理的。这是因为利率接近历史低点，而且互联网接入有效地打破了华尔街和主街之间的障碍，这些障碍在过去可能会阻碍市盈率倍数。</blockquote></p><p> However, previous instances of the S&amp;P 500's Shiller P/E ratio crossing above and sustaining the 30 levelhaven't ended well. In the prior four instances where the Shiller P/E surpassed and held above 30, the benchmark index tumbled anywhere from 20% to as much as 89%. Although an 89% plunge, which was experienced during the Great Depression, is very unlikely these days, a big drop has historically been in the cards when valuations get extended, as they are now.</p><p><blockquote>然而，此前标普500席勒市盈率突破并维持在30水平的情况并没有得到很好的结局。在之前四次席勒市盈率超过并保持在30以上的情况下，基准指数下跌了20%至89%。尽管如今不太可能出现大萧条期间经历的89%的暴跌，但从历史上看，当估值延长时，就有可能出现大幅下跌，就像现在一样。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Keep that cash handy in the event that opportunity knocks</b></p><p><blockquote><b>将现金放在手边，以防机会来袭</b></blockquote></p><p> To circle back to the original question at hand, the data is pretty clear that the likelihood of a stock market crash or correction has grown considerably. It's impossible to precisely predict when a crash might occur, how long the decline will last, or how steep the drop could be. But the data strongly suggests that downside is in the offing.</p><p><blockquote>回到手头的最初问题，数据非常清楚地表明，股市崩盘或调整的可能性已经大大增加。不可能准确预测崩盘何时可能发生，下跌将持续多长时间，或者下跌幅度有多大。但数据强烈表明下行趋势即将到来。</blockquote></p><p> While this might be a disappointing revelation to some investors, it shouldn't be. Crashes and corrections are a normal part of the investing cycle. More importantly, theyprovide an opportunityfor investors to buy into great companies at a discount. Just think about all the great companies you're probably kicking yourself over for not buying last March.</p><p><blockquote>虽然这对一些投资者来说可能是一个令人失望的发现，但事实并非如此。崩盘和调整是投资周期的正常部分。更重要的是，它们为投资者提供了以折扣价购买伟大公司的机会。想想去年三月你可能会因为没有购买而自责的所有伟大公司。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The reason to be excited about crashes and corrections is also found in the data. You see, of those 38 previous corrections in the S&amp;P 500 since the beginning of 1950, each and every one has eventually been put into the rearview mirror by a bull market rally. Plus,at no point over the past centuryhave rolling 20-year total returns (including dividends) for the S&amp;P 500 been negative.</p><p><blockquote>对崩溃和修正感到兴奋的原因也可以在数据中找到。你看，自1950年初以来的38次标普500调整中，每一次最终都被牛市反弹抛到了后视镜中。此外，在过去的一个世纪里，标普500的20年滚动总回报率（包括股息）从未为负。</blockquote></p><p> If you need further encouragement to buy during a correction, keep in mind that 24 of the 38 double-digit declines in the S&amp;P 500 havefound their bottom in 104 or fewer calendar days(3.5 months or less). Crashes and corrections may be steep at times but tend to resolve quickly. That's your cue to have cash at the ready in the event that opportunity knocks.</p><p><blockquote>如果您在调整期间需要进一步鼓励买入，请记住，标普500 38次两位数下跌中有24次是在104个或更短的日历日（3.5个月或更短）内触底的。崩溃和修正有时可能很剧烈，但往往会很快解决。这是你在机会来临时准备好现金的提示。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/how-likely-is-a-stock-market-crash/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/02/how-likely-is-a-stock-market-crash/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191998262","content_text":"You may not like the answer.\n\nFor the past year, investors have enjoyed one of the greatest bounce-back rallies of all time. After the benchmarkS&P 500(SNPINDEX:^GSPC)lost a third of its value in mere weeks due to unprecedented uncertainties surrounding the coronavirus pandemic, it bounced back to gain in the neighborhood of 75% off its lows. You could rightly say that patience has paid off.\nBut there's another reality that investors -- especially long-term investors -- are keenly aware of: the propensity of the stock market to crash or correct. Things might look great now, but the next big nosedive is always waiting in the wings.\nIt begs the question: How likely is astock market crash? Let's take a closer look.\nDouble-digit declines occur every 1.87 years, on average\nTo begin with the basics, stock market corrections (i.e., declines of at least 10%) are quite common in the S&P 500. According to data from market analytics firm Yardeni Research, there have been 38 corrections in the S&P 500 since the beginning of 1950. This works out to an average double-digit decline in the benchmark indexevery 1.87 years. Since it's now been more than a year since the market hit its bear-market bottom, the averages are certainly not in investors' favor.\nHowever, averages are nothing more than that... averages. The market doesn't adhere to averages, even if some folks base their investments off of what's happened historically.\nWe could enter a period similar to 1991 through 1996 where there were zero corrections. Or we could continue the theme since the beginning of 2010, where corrections occur, on average, every 19 months.\nCorrections have been an historical given within three years of a bear market bottom\nAnother interesting piece of evidence to examine is the frequency by which the S&P 500 corrects after hitting a bear-market bottom.\nSince the beginning of 1960 (an arbitrary year I chose for the sake of simplicity), the widely followed index has navigated its way through nine bear markets, including the coronavirus crash. In rebounding from each of the previous eight bear market lows, there was at least one double-digit percentage decline within three years100% of the time. In aggregate, 13 corrections have occurred within three years following the last eight bear market bottoms (i.e., either one or two following each bottom).\nPut another way, rebounding from a bear-market bottom is rarely a straight-line move higher. Yet up, up, and away has pretty much been the theme for investors since March 23, 2020. History would suggest that there's a very good chance of a move lower in equities within the next two years.\nCrashes frequently occur when this valuation metric is hit\nBut the most damning bit of evidence might just be the S&P 500's Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. This is a valuation metric that examines the average inflation-adjusted earnings from the previous 10 years. You might also know it as the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE.\nAs of the close of business on March 30, the S&P 500's Shiller P/E ratio hit 35.61. That's well over double its 150-year average of 16.8. Using continuous bull market moves as a parameter, it's the second-highest reading in its history.\nTo some extent, itmakes sensethat equity valuations should be higher now than they've been historically. That's because interest rates are near an all-time low and access to the internet has effectively broken down barriers between Wall Street and Main Street that may have, in the past, kept P/E multiples at bay.\nHowever, previous instances of the S&P 500's Shiller P/E ratio crossing above and sustaining the 30 levelhaven't ended well. In the prior four instances where the Shiller P/E surpassed and held above 30, the benchmark index tumbled anywhere from 20% to as much as 89%. Although an 89% plunge, which was experienced during the Great Depression, is very unlikely these days, a big drop has historically been in the cards when valuations get extended, as they are now.\nKeep that cash handy in the event that opportunity knocks\nTo circle back to the original question at hand, the data is pretty clear that the likelihood of a stock market crash or correction has grown considerably. It's impossible to precisely predict when a crash might occur, how long the decline will last, or how steep the drop could be. But the data strongly suggests that downside is in the offing.\nWhile this might be a disappointing revelation to some investors, it shouldn't be. Crashes and corrections are a normal part of the investing cycle. More importantly, theyprovide an opportunityfor investors to buy into great companies at a discount. Just think about all the great companies you're probably kicking yourself over for not buying last March.\nThe reason to be excited about crashes and corrections is also found in the data. You see, of those 38 previous corrections in the S&P 500 since the beginning of 1950, each and every one has eventually been put into the rearview mirror by a bull market rally. Plus,at no point over the past centuryhave rolling 20-year total returns (including dividends) for the S&P 500 been negative.\nIf you need further encouragement to buy during a correction, keep in mind that 24 of the 38 double-digit declines in the S&P 500 havefound their bottom in 104 or fewer calendar days(3.5 months or less). Crashes and corrections may be steep at times but tend to resolve quickly. That's your cue to have cash at the ready in the event that opportunity knocks.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2959,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":340878146,"gmtCreate":1617379718985,"gmtModify":1634521166999,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"A mind blowing result. Tesla is gg to fly on Monday！&nbsp;","listText":"A mind blowing result. Tesla is gg to fly on Monday！&nbsp;","text":"A mind blowing result. Tesla is gg to fly on Monday！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340878146","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340989073,"gmtCreate":1617330165492,"gmtModify":1634521391113,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and&nbsp;crypto? ..&nbsp;","listText":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and&nbsp;crypto? ..&nbsp;","text":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and crypto? ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340989073","repostId":"1110671753","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":551,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357774968,"gmtCreate":1617318683454,"gmtModify":1634521494033,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Economy booming will lead&nbsp;to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?&nbsp;","listText":"Economy booming will lead&nbsp;to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?&nbsp;","text":"Economy booming will lead to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357774968","repostId":"1103381745","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":374,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357772493,"gmtCreate":1617318513012,"gmtModify":1634521495122,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"AMD shd be a potential 2x stocks in 3yrs&nbsp;","listText":"AMD shd be a potential 2x stocks in 3yrs&nbsp;","text":"AMD shd be a potential 2x stocks in 3yrs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357772493","repostId":"1118806094","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":643,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357370909,"gmtCreate":1617241674301,"gmtModify":1634521856474,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..&nbsp;","listText":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..&nbsp;","text":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357370909","repostId":"2124271721","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":352051624,"gmtCreate":1616836935268,"gmtModify":1634523760632,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!&nbsp;","listText":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!&nbsp;","text":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/352051624","repostId":"2122472374","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":847,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322164637,"gmtCreate":1615784394929,"gmtModify":1703492905415,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"One of the traditional payment gateway provider who continue to evolve to two on the growth like&nbsp;visa n master based on the number shore here. 👍🏻","listText":"One of the traditional payment gateway provider who continue to evolve to two on the growth like&nbsp;visa n master based on the number shore here. 👍🏻","text":"One of the traditional payment gateway provider who continue to evolve to two on the growth like visa n master based on the number shore here. 👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322164637","repostId":"1111036221","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":504,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321736754,"gmtCreate":1615469367278,"gmtModify":1703489482817,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple, Amazon and Google are blue chips tech stock. Tesla is the next gen leader. All are worth holding for long term !&nbsp;","listText":"Apple, Amazon and Google are blue chips tech stock. Tesla is the next gen leader. All are worth holding for long term !&nbsp;","text":"Apple, Amazon and Google are blue chips tech stock. Tesla is the next gen leader. All are worth holding for long term !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/321736754","repostId":"1115960803","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":982,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321736900,"gmtCreate":1615469255000,"gmtModify":1703489481610,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/321736900","repostId":"1115960803","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":627,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":323541564,"gmtCreate":1615360665758,"gmtModify":1703487864607,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is EV ready a delusion? Heard and read that EV is really booming in China. May be friends of Tiger brokerage can confirm too. ☺️","listText":"Is EV ready a delusion? Heard and read that EV is really booming in China. May be friends of Tiger brokerage can confirm too. ☺️","text":"Is EV ready a delusion? Heard and read that EV is really booming in China. May be friends of Tiger brokerage can confirm too. ☺️","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323541564","repostId":"1143995568","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143995568","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615359392,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143995568?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-10 14:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and Other EV Stocks Are Bouncing Back. That Doesn’t Mean the Bubble Won’t Pop.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车股票正在反弹。这并不意味着泡沫不会破裂。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143995568","media":"Barrons","summary":"After abrutal selloff that lasted weeks, electric-vehicle investors were able to exhale on Tuesday a","content":"<p>After abrutal selloff&nbsp;that lasted weeks, electric-vehicle&nbsp;investors&nbsp;were able to exhale on Tuesday as shares of those stocks rallied.</p><p><blockquote>在持续数周的残酷抛售之后，电动汽车投资者周二松了一口气，因为这些股票的股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) stock rose almost 20% on Tuesday after a 37% drop from its 52-week high. Other electric-vehicle stocks traded higher, too.NIO(NIO) shares gained 17% and&nbsp;Canoo(GOEV) jumped almost 10%.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股价在从52周高点下跌37%后，周二上涨近20%。其他电动汽车股票也走高。蔚来（蔚来）股价上涨17%，Canoo(GOEV)股价上涨近10%。</blockquote></p><p> The bulls are happy, but the bears aren’t buying it. Those in the latter camp are still calling electric-vehicle stocks a bubble and are looking for signs that it will pop.</p><p><blockquote>多头很高兴，但空头并不买账。后一阵营的人仍在称电动汽车股票为泡沫，并在寻找泡沫将破裂的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> “The excitement around electric cars in recent months has had the hallmarks of a bubble,” wrote Gavekal Research’s Louis Gave in a Tuesday report. He published a list of bubble warning signs that includes, for starters allegations of fraud. Gave pointed toNikola(NKLA) as an example. In September, Short seller Hindenburg Researchaccused Nikola’s managementof misleading investors, a claim that Nikoladenies. The report has led to the exit of board chair Trevor Milton, an internal investigation, and a lower share price, among other things.</p><p><blockquote>Gavekal Research的路易斯·加夫(Louis Gave)在周二的一份报告中写道：“近几个月来围绕电动汽车的兴奋具有泡沫的特征。”他公布了一份泡沫警告信号清单，首先包括欺诈指控。以尖托尼科拉（NKLA）为例。9月，卖空者兴登堡研究公司指责尼古拉的管理层误导投资者，但尼古拉否认了这一说法。该报告导致董事会主席特雷弗·米尔顿(Trevor Milton)离职、内部调查以及股价下跌等。</blockquote></p><p> Also on Gave’s list are hubristic chief executives, a term he used to describe Tesla CEOElon Musk. Musk certainly generates a lot of buzz and some controversy. Even so,Musk has succeededin building a car company from scratch as well as sending astronauts to the International Space Station on a privately built rocket ship.</p><p><blockquote>Gave的名单上还有傲慢的首席执行官，他用这个词来形容特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk。马斯克确实引起了很多轰动和一些争议。即便如此，马斯克还是成功地从零开始建立了一家汽车公司，并用私人建造的火箭将宇航员送往国际空间站。</blockquote></p><p> Gave also wrote there are “listings of dubious business model[s],” referring to companies with billion-dollar valuations andzero, or little, salesthat have merged with special acquisition companies, or SPACs. That list includesFisker(FSR), andLordstown Motors(RIDE).</p><p><blockquote>Gave还写道，有“可疑商业模式的上市”，指的是估值数十亿美元、销售额为零或很少的公司，这些公司已与特殊收购公司（SPAC）合并。该名单包括菲斯克(FSR)和洛兹敦汽车(RIDE)。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, Gave said there is the math: “Valuations that assumed the kind of unit growth that seemed almost physically impossible to deliver.” For Gave, expected growth simply can’t keep up withbattery, semiconductor, andlithiumproduction.</p><p><blockquote>最后，Gave表示，还有一个数学问题：“估值假设的单位增长似乎几乎不可能实现。”对于Gave来说，预期的增长根本跟不上电池、半导体和锂的生产。</blockquote></p><p> Gave believes the bubble may be bursting. But that wasn’t his only point. His report was a warning to investors to lighten up on what he called “derivative plays” including battery and lithium suppliers as well as semiconductor companies that sell into the auto market. Three examples that fit that profile areContemporary Amperex Technology Co(300750.China),Livent(LTHM), andOn Semiconductor(ON). Those three stocks are up about 120% on average over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Gave认为泡沫可能正在破裂。但这不是他唯一的观点。他的报告警告投资者减持他所谓的“衍生品”，包括电池和锂供应商以及向汽车市场销售的半导体公司。符合这一特征的三个例子是宁德时代（300750.China）、Livent（LTHM）和安电半导体（ON）。这三只股票在过去12个月内平均上涨了约120%。</blockquote></p><p> Research Affiliates’Rob Arnottsounded even more bearish than Gave. In a report published Tuesday, he called electric vehicles a “big market delusion” because the stocks are all rising and falling together, despite the widely differing prospects of many firms. There will be winners and losers, according to Arnott, but the market isn’t differentiating.</p><p><blockquote>Research Affiliates的罗布·阿诺特(Rob Arnott)听起来比给出的更加悲观。在周二发布的一份报告中，他称电动汽车是一种“巨大的市场错觉”，因为尽管许多公司的前景存在很大差异，但股票都在一起上涨和下跌。阿诺特表示，会有赢家和输家，但市场并没有分化。</blockquote></p><p> He doesn’t sound upbeat on any potential winners, either. “In the highly competitive and capital-intensive auto industry, the January 2021 valuations of electric vehicle manufacturers are simply not sustainable over the long term,” wrote Arnott.</p><p><blockquote>他听起来对任何潜在的赢家也不乐观。阿诺特写道：“在竞争激烈、资本密集型的汽车行业，电动汽车制造商2021年1月的估值从长远来看根本不可持续。”</blockquote></p><p> Arnott pointed out that electric-vehicle makers are worth roughly the same as the entire traditional automotive industry despite generating a tiny fraction of sales. “The EV phenomenon will not change the fact that the auto industry will remain highly competitive and capital intensive,” added Arnott. “Not every company can be a winner.”</p><p><blockquote>阿诺特指出，电动汽车制造商的价值与整个传统汽车行业大致相同，尽管其销售额只占很小一部分。阿诺特补充道：“电动汽车现象不会改变汽车行业将保持高度竞争力和资本密集型的事实。”“不是每家公司都能成为赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That might be the case. Still,Amazon.com(AMZN) got its start inthe dot-com bubble.</p><p><blockquote>可能是这样。尽管如此，亚马逊（AMZN）还是在互联网泡沫中起步的。</blockquote></p><p> Arnott and Gave have had the upper hand in the electric vehicle debate for a couple of weeks, but bulls are feeling better after Tesla’s rally on Tuesday. Shares rose formultiple reasons: The stock was upgraded by New Street Research analyst Pierre Ferragu, February China deliveries demonstrated the global electric vehicle market remains healthy, and theNasdaq Compositerallied 3.7% as inflation fears subsided. The Nasdaq is home to many richly valued, high-growth companies Tesla. Higher inflation means higher interest rates, which makes it more expensive for companies to fund all that growth. Plus, because growth companies generate most of their cash flow years down the road, that cash is less valuable, relatively speaking, when investors can earn more interest on their money in the present day.</p><p><blockquote>几周来，阿诺特和加夫在电动汽车辩论中占据上风，但在特斯拉周二上涨后，多头感觉好多了。股价上涨有多种原因：New Street Research分析师Pierre Ferragu上调了该股评级，2月份中国交付量表明全球电动汽车市场依然健康，随着通胀担忧消退，纳斯达克综合指数上涨3.7%。纳斯达克是特斯拉许多估值高、高增长公司的所在地。更高的通胀意味着更高的利率，这使得企业为所有增长提供资金的成本更高。此外，由于成长型公司的大部分现金流是在未来几年产生的，因此相对而言，当投资者目前可以从他们的钱中赚取更多利息时，这些现金的价值就会降低。</blockquote></p><p> The debate won’t be settled soon and the bulls have other arguments, too. They say electric-vehicle companies grow faster than traditional automakers and deserve high valuation multiples. What’s more, for every electric vehicle that, say,General Motors(GM) sells, there is a gasoline-powered car that goes unsold. There is little net growth for a traditional automaker converting to an electric powertrain, so GM shouldn’t be valued like a growth stock. Finally, bulls argue there is anautonomous drivingcomponent to automotive valuation that the entire marketplace must wrestle with. It is possible that self-driving software can generate extra sales never realized before by all automakers.</p><p><blockquote>这场争论不会很快解决，多头也有其他论点。他们表示，电动汽车公司的增长速度快于传统汽车制造商，理应获得高估值倍数。更重要的是，通用汽车(GM)每销售一辆电动汽车，就有一辆汽油动力汽车卖不出去。传统汽车制造商转向电动动力系统几乎没有净增长，因此通用汽车不应像成长型股票那样估值。最后，看多者认为，汽车估值中存在自动驾驶因素，整个市场都必须应对。自动驾驶软件可能会产生所有汽车制造商从未实现过的额外销售额。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> There is a lot to consider. That makes one day’s gyrations even more difficult to interpret.</p><p><blockquote>有很多事情要考虑。这使得一天的波动更加难以解释。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and Other EV Stocks Are Bouncing Back. That Doesn’t Mean the Bubble Won’t Pop.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车股票正在反弹。这并不意味着泡沫不会破裂。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and Other EV Stocks Are Bouncing Back. That Doesn’t Mean the Bubble Won’t Pop.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车股票正在反弹。这并不意味着泡沫不会破裂。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-03-10 14:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After abrutal selloff&nbsp;that lasted weeks, electric-vehicle&nbsp;investors&nbsp;were able to exhale on Tuesday as shares of those stocks rallied.</p><p><blockquote>在持续数周的残酷抛售之后，电动汽车投资者周二松了一口气，因为这些股票的股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) stock rose almost 20% on Tuesday after a 37% drop from its 52-week high. Other electric-vehicle stocks traded higher, too.NIO(NIO) shares gained 17% and&nbsp;Canoo(GOEV) jumped almost 10%.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股价在从52周高点下跌37%后，周二上涨近20%。其他电动汽车股票也走高。蔚来（蔚来）股价上涨17%，Canoo(GOEV)股价上涨近10%。</blockquote></p><p> The bulls are happy, but the bears aren’t buying it. Those in the latter camp are still calling electric-vehicle stocks a bubble and are looking for signs that it will pop.</p><p><blockquote>多头很高兴，但空头并不买账。后一阵营的人仍在称电动汽车股票为泡沫，并在寻找泡沫将破裂的迹象。</blockquote></p><p> “The excitement around electric cars in recent months has had the hallmarks of a bubble,” wrote Gavekal Research’s Louis Gave in a Tuesday report. He published a list of bubble warning signs that includes, for starters allegations of fraud. Gave pointed toNikola(NKLA) as an example. In September, Short seller Hindenburg Researchaccused Nikola’s managementof misleading investors, a claim that Nikoladenies. The report has led to the exit of board chair Trevor Milton, an internal investigation, and a lower share price, among other things.</p><p><blockquote>Gavekal Research的路易斯·加夫(Louis Gave)在周二的一份报告中写道：“近几个月来围绕电动汽车的兴奋具有泡沫的特征。”他公布了一份泡沫警告信号清单，首先包括欺诈指控。以尖托尼科拉（NKLA）为例。9月，卖空者兴登堡研究公司指责尼古拉的管理层误导投资者，但尼古拉否认了这一说法。该报告导致董事会主席特雷弗·米尔顿(Trevor Milton)离职、内部调查以及股价下跌等。</blockquote></p><p> Also on Gave’s list are hubristic chief executives, a term he used to describe Tesla CEOElon Musk. Musk certainly generates a lot of buzz and some controversy. Even so,Musk has succeededin building a car company from scratch as well as sending astronauts to the International Space Station on a privately built rocket ship.</p><p><blockquote>Gave的名单上还有傲慢的首席执行官，他用这个词来形容特斯拉首席执行官Elon Musk。马斯克确实引起了很多轰动和一些争议。即便如此，马斯克还是成功地从零开始建立了一家汽车公司，并用私人建造的火箭将宇航员送往国际空间站。</blockquote></p><p> Gave also wrote there are “listings of dubious business model[s],” referring to companies with billion-dollar valuations andzero, or little, salesthat have merged with special acquisition companies, or SPACs. That list includesFisker(FSR), andLordstown Motors(RIDE).</p><p><blockquote>Gave还写道，有“可疑商业模式的上市”，指的是估值数十亿美元、销售额为零或很少的公司，这些公司已与特殊收购公司（SPAC）合并。该名单包括菲斯克(FSR)和洛兹敦汽车(RIDE)。</blockquote></p><p> Finally, Gave said there is the math: “Valuations that assumed the kind of unit growth that seemed almost physically impossible to deliver.” For Gave, expected growth simply can’t keep up withbattery, semiconductor, andlithiumproduction.</p><p><blockquote>最后，Gave表示，还有一个数学问题：“估值假设的单位增长似乎几乎不可能实现。”对于Gave来说，预期的增长根本跟不上电池、半导体和锂的生产。</blockquote></p><p> Gave believes the bubble may be bursting. But that wasn’t his only point. His report was a warning to investors to lighten up on what he called “derivative plays” including battery and lithium suppliers as well as semiconductor companies that sell into the auto market. Three examples that fit that profile areContemporary Amperex Technology Co(300750.China),Livent(LTHM), andOn Semiconductor(ON). Those three stocks are up about 120% on average over the past 12 months.</p><p><blockquote>Gave认为泡沫可能正在破裂。但这不是他唯一的观点。他的报告警告投资者减持他所谓的“衍生品”，包括电池和锂供应商以及向汽车市场销售的半导体公司。符合这一特征的三个例子是宁德时代（300750.China）、Livent（LTHM）和安电半导体（ON）。这三只股票在过去12个月内平均上涨了约120%。</blockquote></p><p> Research Affiliates’Rob Arnottsounded even more bearish than Gave. In a report published Tuesday, he called electric vehicles a “big market delusion” because the stocks are all rising and falling together, despite the widely differing prospects of many firms. There will be winners and losers, according to Arnott, but the market isn’t differentiating.</p><p><blockquote>Research Affiliates的罗布·阿诺特(Rob Arnott)听起来比给出的更加悲观。在周二发布的一份报告中，他称电动汽车是一种“巨大的市场错觉”，因为尽管许多公司的前景存在很大差异，但股票都在一起上涨和下跌。阿诺特表示，会有赢家和输家，但市场并没有分化。</blockquote></p><p> He doesn’t sound upbeat on any potential winners, either. “In the highly competitive and capital-intensive auto industry, the January 2021 valuations of electric vehicle manufacturers are simply not sustainable over the long term,” wrote Arnott.</p><p><blockquote>他听起来对任何潜在的赢家也不乐观。阿诺特写道：“在竞争激烈、资本密集型的汽车行业，电动汽车制造商2021年1月的估值从长远来看根本不可持续。”</blockquote></p><p> Arnott pointed out that electric-vehicle makers are worth roughly the same as the entire traditional automotive industry despite generating a tiny fraction of sales. “The EV phenomenon will not change the fact that the auto industry will remain highly competitive and capital intensive,” added Arnott. “Not every company can be a winner.”</p><p><blockquote>阿诺特指出，电动汽车制造商的价值与整个传统汽车行业大致相同，尽管其销售额只占很小一部分。阿诺特补充道：“电动汽车现象不会改变汽车行业将保持高度竞争力和资本密集型的事实。”“不是每家公司都能成为赢家。”</blockquote></p><p> That might be the case. Still,Amazon.com(AMZN) got its start inthe dot-com bubble.</p><p><blockquote>可能是这样。尽管如此，亚马逊（AMZN）还是在互联网泡沫中起步的。</blockquote></p><p> Arnott and Gave have had the upper hand in the electric vehicle debate for a couple of weeks, but bulls are feeling better after Tesla’s rally on Tuesday. Shares rose formultiple reasons: The stock was upgraded by New Street Research analyst Pierre Ferragu, February China deliveries demonstrated the global electric vehicle market remains healthy, and theNasdaq Compositerallied 3.7% as inflation fears subsided. The Nasdaq is home to many richly valued, high-growth companies Tesla. Higher inflation means higher interest rates, which makes it more expensive for companies to fund all that growth. Plus, because growth companies generate most of their cash flow years down the road, that cash is less valuable, relatively speaking, when investors can earn more interest on their money in the present day.</p><p><blockquote>几周来，阿诺特和加夫在电动汽车辩论中占据上风，但在特斯拉周二上涨后，多头感觉好多了。股价上涨有多种原因：New Street Research分析师Pierre Ferragu上调了该股评级，2月份中国交付量表明全球电动汽车市场依然健康，随着通胀担忧消退，纳斯达克综合指数上涨3.7%。纳斯达克是特斯拉许多估值高、高增长公司的所在地。更高的通胀意味着更高的利率，这使得企业为所有增长提供资金的成本更高。此外，由于成长型公司的大部分现金流是在未来几年产生的，因此相对而言，当投资者目前可以从他们的钱中赚取更多利息时，这些现金的价值就会降低。</blockquote></p><p> The debate won’t be settled soon and the bulls have other arguments, too. They say electric-vehicle companies grow faster than traditional automakers and deserve high valuation multiples. What’s more, for every electric vehicle that, say,General Motors(GM) sells, there is a gasoline-powered car that goes unsold. There is little net growth for a traditional automaker converting to an electric powertrain, so GM shouldn’t be valued like a growth stock. Finally, bulls argue there is anautonomous drivingcomponent to automotive valuation that the entire marketplace must wrestle with. It is possible that self-driving software can generate extra sales never realized before by all automakers.</p><p><blockquote>这场争论不会很快解决，多头也有其他论点。他们表示，电动汽车公司的增长速度快于传统汽车制造商，理应获得高估值倍数。更重要的是，通用汽车(GM)每销售一辆电动汽车，就有一辆汽油动力汽车卖不出去。传统汽车制造商转向电动动力系统几乎没有净增长，因此通用汽车不应像成长型股票那样估值。最后，看多者认为，汽车估值中存在自动驾驶因素，整个市场都必须应对。自动驾驶软件可能会产生所有汽车制造商从未实现过的额外销售额。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> There is a lot to consider. That makes one day’s gyrations even more difficult to interpret.</p><p><blockquote>有很多事情要考虑。这使得一天的波动更加难以解释。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-and-other-ev-stocks-are-bouncing-back-that-doesnt-mean-the-bubble-wont-pop-51615337605?mod=RTA\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LI":"理想汽车","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","NIO":"蔚来","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-and-other-ev-stocks-are-bouncing-back-that-doesnt-mean-the-bubble-wont-pop-51615337605?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143995568","content_text":"After abrutal selloff that lasted weeks, electric-vehicle investors were able to exhale on Tuesday as shares of those stocks rallied.\nTesla (ticker: TSLA) stock rose almost 20% on Tuesday after a 37% drop from its 52-week high. Other electric-vehicle stocks traded higher, too.NIO(NIO) shares gained 17% and Canoo(GOEV) jumped almost 10%.\nThe bulls are happy, but the bears aren’t buying it. Those in the latter camp are still calling electric-vehicle stocks a bubble and are looking for signs that it will pop.\n“The excitement around electric cars in recent months has had the hallmarks of a bubble,” wrote Gavekal Research’s Louis Gave in a Tuesday report. He published a list of bubble warning signs that includes, for starters allegations of fraud. Gave pointed toNikola(NKLA) as an example. In September, Short seller Hindenburg Researchaccused Nikola’s managementof misleading investors, a claim that Nikoladenies. The report has led to the exit of board chair Trevor Milton, an internal investigation, and a lower share price, among other things.\nAlso on Gave’s list are hubristic chief executives, a term he used to describe Tesla CEOElon Musk. Musk certainly generates a lot of buzz and some controversy. Even so,Musk has succeededin building a car company from scratch as well as sending astronauts to the International Space Station on a privately built rocket ship.\nGave also wrote there are “listings of dubious business model[s],” referring to companies with billion-dollar valuations andzero, or little, salesthat have merged with special acquisition companies, or SPACs. That list includesFisker(FSR), andLordstown Motors(RIDE).\nFinally, Gave said there is the math: “Valuations that assumed the kind of unit growth that seemed almost physically impossible to deliver.” For Gave, expected growth simply can’t keep up withbattery, semiconductor, andlithiumproduction.\nGave believes the bubble may be bursting. But that wasn’t his only point. His report was a warning to investors to lighten up on what he called “derivative plays” including battery and lithium suppliers as well as semiconductor companies that sell into the auto market. Three examples that fit that profile areContemporary Amperex Technology Co(300750.China),Livent(LTHM), andOn Semiconductor(ON). Those three stocks are up about 120% on average over the past 12 months.\nResearch Affiliates’Rob Arnottsounded even more bearish than Gave. In a report published Tuesday, he called electric vehicles a “big market delusion” because the stocks are all rising and falling together, despite the widely differing prospects of many firms. There will be winners and losers, according to Arnott, but the market isn’t differentiating.\nHe doesn’t sound upbeat on any potential winners, either. “In the highly competitive and capital-intensive auto industry, the January 2021 valuations of electric vehicle manufacturers are simply not sustainable over the long term,” wrote Arnott.\nArnott pointed out that electric-vehicle makers are worth roughly the same as the entire traditional automotive industry despite generating a tiny fraction of sales. “The EV phenomenon will not change the fact that the auto industry will remain highly competitive and capital intensive,” added Arnott. “Not every company can be a winner.”\nThat might be the case. Still,Amazon.com(AMZN) got its start inthe dot-com bubble.\nArnott and Gave have had the upper hand in the electric vehicle debate for a couple of weeks, but bulls are feeling better after Tesla’s rally on Tuesday. Shares rose formultiple reasons: The stock was upgraded by New Street Research analyst Pierre Ferragu, February China deliveries demonstrated the global electric vehicle market remains healthy, and theNasdaq Compositerallied 3.7% as inflation fears subsided. The Nasdaq is home to many richly valued, high-growth companies Tesla. Higher inflation means higher interest rates, which makes it more expensive for companies to fund all that growth. Plus, because growth companies generate most of their cash flow years down the road, that cash is less valuable, relatively speaking, when investors can earn more interest on their money in the present day.\nThe debate won’t be settled soon and the bulls have other arguments, too. They say electric-vehicle companies grow faster than traditional automakers and deserve high valuation multiples. What’s more, for every electric vehicle that, say,General Motors(GM) sells, there is a gasoline-powered car that goes unsold. There is little net growth for a traditional automaker converting to an electric powertrain, so GM shouldn’t be valued like a growth stock. Finally, bulls argue there is anautonomous drivingcomponent to automotive valuation that the entire marketplace must wrestle with. It is possible that self-driving software can generate extra sales never realized before by all automakers.\nThere is a lot to consider. That makes one day’s gyrations even more difficult to interpret.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOEV":0.9,"LI":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329779055,"gmtCreate":1615283900977,"gmtModify":1703486736148,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ark fundtions by buying or selling&nbsp;stocks based on research and conviction or change in fundamental. It will outperform in long run.&nbsp;","listText":"Ark fundtions by buying or selling&nbsp;stocks based on research and conviction or change in fundamental. It will outperform in long run.&nbsp;","text":"Ark fundtions by buying or selling stocks based on research and conviction or change in fundamental. It will outperform in long run.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329779055","repostId":"2118252697","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118252697","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1615280303,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2118252697?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-09 16:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Ark's Cathie Wood Is More Confident In Tesla Despite Sell-Off<blockquote>为什么Ark的Cathie Wood尽管遭到抛售，但对特斯拉更有信心</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118252697","media":"Benzinga","summary":"On CNBC's \"Closing Bell,\" Ark Investment Management CEO Cathie Wood gave her opinion on Tesla Inc(NA","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ee3cb06746bc791baa055c8700c75ae\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> On CNBC's \"Closing Bell,\"&nbsp;Ark&nbsp;Investment Management CEO Cathie Wood gave her opinion on <b>Tesla Inc</b>(NASDAQ: TSLA)&nbsp;amid a stark sell-off Monday, as well as in recent weeks.</p><p><blockquote>在CNBC的“收盘钟声”节目中，方舟投资管理公司首席执行官凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)发表了她的看法<b>特斯拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA）在周一以及最近几周的严重抛售中。</blockquote></p><p> “Our confidence in Tesla has gone up for a number of reasons,” said Wood, highlighting both Tesla's market share and its progress in the autonomous space.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“出于多种原因，我们对特斯拉的信心有所增强。”他强调了特斯拉的市场份额及其在自动驾驶领域的进展。</blockquote></p><p> \"It didn't lose share in the EV market when the luxury brands started bringing EVs to the market,\" said Wood.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“当豪华品牌开始将电动汽车推向市场时，它并没有失去电动汽车市场的份额。”</blockquote></p><p> She noted by the end of 2018 Ark’s expectation was for Tesla’s market share to decrease as more EVs came out, but it instead increased.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，到2018年底，Ark的预期是，随着更多电动汽车的推出，特斯拉的市场份额将会下降，但实际上却有所增加。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe that Tesla has been staging the movement into autonomy differently,\" said Wood.</p><p><blockquote>伍德说：“我们相信特斯拉一直在以不同的方式进行自治运动。”</blockquote></p><p> Wood&nbsp;believes there's a misunderstanding as to how Tesla is going to market its autonomy segment. She&nbsp;also spoke about the strength in the company's AI chip and battery technology as to why Ark is still confident in Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>伍德认为，对于特斯拉将如何营销其自动驾驶领域存在误解。她还谈到了公司人工智能芯片和电池技术的实力，以及为什么方舟对特斯拉仍然充满信心。</blockquote></p><p> Telsa's stock traded down 5.8% to $563&nbsp;on&nbsp;Monday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价周一下跌5.8%，至563美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Ark's Cathie Wood Is More Confident In Tesla Despite Sell-Off<blockquote>为什么Ark的Cathie Wood尽管遭到抛售，但对特斯拉更有信心</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Ark's Cathie Wood Is More Confident In Tesla Despite Sell-Off<blockquote>为什么Ark的Cathie Wood尽管遭到抛售，但对特斯拉更有信心</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-09 16:58</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ee3cb06746bc791baa055c8700c75ae\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> On CNBC's \"Closing Bell,\"&nbsp;Ark&nbsp;Investment Management CEO Cathie Wood gave her opinion on <b>Tesla Inc</b>(NASDAQ: TSLA)&nbsp;amid a stark sell-off Monday, as well as in recent weeks.</p><p><blockquote>在CNBC的“收盘钟声”节目中，方舟投资管理公司首席执行官凯西·伍德(Cathie Wood)发表了她的看法<b>特斯拉公司</b>（纳斯达克：TSLA）在周一以及最近几周的严重抛售中。</blockquote></p><p> “Our confidence in Tesla has gone up for a number of reasons,” said Wood, highlighting both Tesla's market share and its progress in the autonomous space.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“出于多种原因，我们对特斯拉的信心有所增强。”他强调了特斯拉的市场份额及其在自动驾驶领域的进展。</blockquote></p><p> \"It didn't lose share in the EV market when the luxury brands started bringing EVs to the market,\" said Wood.</p><p><blockquote>伍德表示：“当豪华品牌开始将电动汽车推向市场时，它并没有失去电动汽车市场的份额。”</blockquote></p><p> She noted by the end of 2018 Ark’s expectation was for Tesla’s market share to decrease as more EVs came out, but it instead increased.</p><p><blockquote>她指出，到2018年底，Ark的预期是，随着更多电动汽车的推出，特斯拉的市场份额将会下降，但实际上却有所增加。</blockquote></p><p> \"We believe that Tesla has been staging the movement into autonomy differently,\" said Wood.</p><p><blockquote>伍德说：“我们相信特斯拉一直在以不同的方式进行自治运动。”</blockquote></p><p> Wood&nbsp;believes there's a misunderstanding as to how Tesla is going to market its autonomy segment. She&nbsp;also spoke about the strength in the company's AI chip and battery technology as to why Ark is still confident in Tesla.</p><p><blockquote>伍德认为，对于特斯拉将如何营销其自动驾驶领域存在误解。她还谈到了公司人工智能芯片和电池技术的实力，以及为什么方舟对特斯拉仍然充满信心。</blockquote></p><p> Telsa's stock traded down 5.8% to $563&nbsp;on&nbsp;Monday.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股价周一下跌5.8%，至563美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118252697","content_text":"On CNBC's \"Closing Bell,\" Ark Investment Management CEO Cathie Wood gave her opinion on Tesla Inc(NASDAQ: TSLA) amid a stark sell-off Monday, as well as in recent weeks.\n“Our confidence in Tesla has gone up for a number of reasons,” said Wood, highlighting both Tesla's market share and its progress in the autonomous space.\n\"It didn't lose share in the EV market when the luxury brands started bringing EVs to the market,\" said Wood.\nShe noted by the end of 2018 Ark’s expectation was for Tesla’s market share to decrease as more EVs came out, but it instead increased.\n\"We believe that Tesla has been staging the movement into autonomy differently,\" said Wood.\nWood believes there's a misunderstanding as to how Tesla is going to market its autonomy segment. She also spoke about the strength in the company's AI chip and battery technology as to why Ark is still confident in Tesla.\nTelsa's stock traded down 5.8% to $563 on Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"ARKIU":0.9,"ARKK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":725,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":850449540,"gmtCreate":1634620172911,"gmtModify":1634620173032,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !&nbsp;","listText":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !&nbsp;","text":"Actually we could build a solid portfolio with this list !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850449540","repostId":"1123286896","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2287,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":177401825,"gmtCreate":1627256144867,"gmtModify":1633766918719,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday &nbsp;and&nbsp;Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","listText":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday &nbsp;and&nbsp;Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","text":"Fly or sink ? Fly depends on Monday and Tuesday earning and price trend. Fly I hope. Your takes ? :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/177401825","repostId":"1100772026","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3057,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148960104,"gmtCreate":1625917028108,"gmtModify":1633936129495,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.&nbsp;","listText":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.&nbsp;","text":"Banks are at the cross road from the stock market perspective.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/148960104","repostId":"1101087642","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":850466277,"gmtCreate":1634617935540,"gmtModify":1634617936051,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis&nbsp;is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar&nbsp;retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?&nbsp;","listText":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis&nbsp;is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar&nbsp;retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?&nbsp;","text":"There are many type of analyst. This one for Tesla analysis is like compare Amazon with a brick and mortar retail supermarket and shouting Amazon is overvalue when it was below $500?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850466277","repostId":"1147398025","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"<p>Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.</p><p><blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).</p><p><blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote></p><p> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).</p><p><blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote></p><p> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.</p><p><blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote></p><p> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.</p><p><blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.</p><p><blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote></p><p> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.</p><p><blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote></p><p> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.</p><p><blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote></p><p> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”</p><p><blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote></p><p> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”</p><p><blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote></p><p> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.</p><p><blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-10-19 09:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote></p><p> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.</p><p><blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote></p><p> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).</p><p><blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote></p><p> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).</p><p><blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote></p><p> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.</p><p><blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote></p><p> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.</p><p><blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote></p><p> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.</p><p><blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote></p><p> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.</p><p><blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote></p><p> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.</p><p><blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote></p><p> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”</p><p><blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote></p><p> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”</p><p><blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote></p><p> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.</p><p><blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.</p><p><blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","LI":"理想汽车","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","TM":"丰田汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TM":0.9,"01211":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"GM":0.9,"LI":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3031,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":802759510,"gmtCreate":1627811897930,"gmtModify":1631885102334,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks&nbsp;","listText":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks&nbsp;","text":"Holding some. Time to rethink perhaps .. Thks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/802759510","repostId":"1147877145","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1952,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368284045,"gmtCreate":1614329964987,"gmtModify":1703476429197,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s see whether NIO will power pass Li Performance. This is key for EV China stocks reversal up again. I think.&nbsp;","listText":"Let’s see whether NIO will power pass Li Performance. This is key for EV China stocks reversal up again. I think.&nbsp;","text":"Let’s see whether NIO will power pass Li Performance. This is key for EV China stocks reversal up again. I think.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/368284045","repostId":"1111681080","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111681080","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1614323230,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1111681080?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-26 15:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why NIO Stock Dropped Thursday<blockquote>为什么蔚来股价周四下跌</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111681080","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Positive earnings from a Chinese EV peer hasn't helped stocks in the sector today.Many stocks in the electric-vehicle  sector are sinking today, and Chinese EV maker NIO is no exception. With its fourth-quarter and full-year 2020 earnings looming, shares dropped as much as 10% Thursday.Fellow ChineseEV maker Li Auto reported its fourth-quarter earnings today, but the results shouldn't be scaring investors in the sector. Li Auto reported a surprise profit for its fourth quarter, which could bode ","content":"<p>Positive earnings from a Chinese EV peer hasn't helped stocks in the sector today.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车同行的积极盈利并没有帮助该行业的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Many stocks in the electric-vehicle (EV) sector are sinking today, and Chinese EV maker&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;is no exception. With its fourth-quarter and full-year 2020 earnings looming, shares dropped as much as 10% Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车（EV）行业的许多股票今天都在下跌，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来也不例外。随着2020年第四季度和全年收益的临近，周四股价下跌了10%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Fellow ChineseEV maker&nbsp;Li Auto&nbsp;reported its fourth-quarter earnings today, but the results shouldn't be scaring investors in the sector. Li Auto reported a surprise profit for its fourth quarter, which could bode well for what NIO has to say when it reports on Monday, March 1.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商理想汽车今天公布了第四季度收益，但结果不应该吓到该行业的投资者。理想汽车公布了第四季度的意外利润，这对于蔚来在3月1日星期一发布报告时所说的话来说可能是个好兆头。</blockquote></p><p> But investors are knocking back stocks of these high fliers today after extended runs brought high valuations.</p><p><blockquote>但在长期上涨带来高估值后，投资者今天正在回调这些雄心勃勃的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Li Auto reported a surprise positive net income of $16.5 million for its fourth quarter. While NIO competes with LI Auto, the companies offer slightly different products. Li's One SUV was designed to serve a specific niche in China. It includes a small gasoline engine onboard that can be used to recharge its batteries, allowing for longer travel between charging stations.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车公布第四季度净利润出人意料地达到1650万美元。虽然蔚来与理想汽车竞争，但两家公司提供的产品略有不同。Li的One SUV是为中国特定的利基市场而设计的。它包括一个小型汽油发动机，可用于为电池充电，允许在充电站之间进行更长时间的旅行。</blockquote></p><p> NIO delivered 7,225 vehicles&nbsp;in January 2021 and 17,353 in its fourth quarter. These represented 352% and 111% year-over-year gains, respectively. NIO recently announced its first luxury sedan, the ET7, which will also have a new longer-range battery option.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来2021年1月交付了7,225辆汽车，第四季度交付了17,353辆汽车。同比分别增长352%和111%。蔚来最近宣布了其首款豪华轿车ET7，该车还将配备新的远程电池选项。</blockquote></p><p> Including today's drop, shares have already fallen more than 20% from highs earlier this year. NIO's earnings on Monday could help soothe investor anxiety over the stock's high valuation. But for now, a correction remains under way.</p><p><blockquote>包括今天的下跌在内，股价已较今年早些时候的高点下跌超过20%。蔚来周一的财报可能有助于缓解投资者对该股高估值的焦虑。但目前，调整仍在进行中。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why NIO Stock Dropped Thursday<blockquote>为什么蔚来股价周四下跌</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy NIO Stock Dropped Thursday<blockquote>为什么蔚来股价周四下跌</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-26 15:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Positive earnings from a Chinese EV peer hasn't helped stocks in the sector today.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车同行的积极盈利并没有帮助该行业的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>What happened</b></p><p><blockquote><b>发生了什么</b></blockquote></p><p> Many stocks in the electric-vehicle (EV) sector are sinking today, and Chinese EV maker&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;is no exception. With its fourth-quarter and full-year 2020 earnings looming, shares dropped as much as 10% Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>电动汽车（EV）行业的许多股票今天都在下跌，中国电动汽车制造商蔚来也不例外。随着2020年第四季度和全年收益的临近，周四股价下跌了10%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>So what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>那又怎样</b></blockquote></p><p> Fellow ChineseEV maker&nbsp;Li Auto&nbsp;reported its fourth-quarter earnings today, but the results shouldn't be scaring investors in the sector. Li Auto reported a surprise profit for its fourth quarter, which could bode well for what NIO has to say when it reports on Monday, March 1.</p><p><blockquote>中国电动汽车制造商理想汽车今天公布了第四季度收益，但结果不应该吓到该行业的投资者。理想汽车公布了第四季度的意外利润，这对于蔚来在3月1日星期一发布报告时所说的话来说可能是个好兆头。</blockquote></p><p> But investors are knocking back stocks of these high fliers today after extended runs brought high valuations.</p><p><blockquote>但在长期上涨带来高估值后，投资者今天正在回调这些雄心勃勃的股票。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Now what</b></p><p><blockquote><b>现在怎么办</b></blockquote></p><p> Li Auto reported a surprise positive net income of $16.5 million for its fourth quarter. While NIO competes with LI Auto, the companies offer slightly different products. Li's One SUV was designed to serve a specific niche in China. It includes a small gasoline engine onboard that can be used to recharge its batteries, allowing for longer travel between charging stations.</p><p><blockquote>理想汽车公布第四季度净利润出人意料地达到1650万美元。虽然蔚来与理想汽车竞争，但两家公司提供的产品略有不同。Li的One SUV是为中国特定的利基市场而设计的。它包括一个小型汽油发动机，可用于为电池充电，允许在充电站之间进行更长时间的旅行。</blockquote></p><p> NIO delivered 7,225 vehicles&nbsp;in January 2021 and 17,353 in its fourth quarter. These represented 352% and 111% year-over-year gains, respectively. NIO recently announced its first luxury sedan, the ET7, which will also have a new longer-range battery option.</p><p><blockquote>蔚来2021年1月交付了7,225辆汽车，第四季度交付了17,353辆汽车。同比分别增长352%和111%。蔚来最近宣布了其首款豪华轿车ET7，该车还将配备新的远程电池选项。</blockquote></p><p> Including today's drop, shares have already fallen more than 20% from highs earlier this year. NIO's earnings on Monday could help soothe investor anxiety over the stock's high valuation. But for now, a correction remains under way.</p><p><blockquote>包括今天的下跌在内，股价已较今年早些时候的高点下跌超过20%。蔚来周一的财报可能有助于缓解投资者对该股高估值的焦虑。但目前，调整仍在进行中。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/02/25/why-nio-stock-dropped-thursday/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/02/25/why-nio-stock-dropped-thursday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111681080","content_text":"Positive earnings from a Chinese EV peer hasn't helped stocks in the sector today.\nWhat happened\nMany stocks in the electric-vehicle (EV) sector are sinking today, and Chinese EV maker NIO is no exception. With its fourth-quarter and full-year 2020 earnings looming, shares dropped as much as 10% Thursday.\nSo what\nFellow ChineseEV maker Li Auto reported its fourth-quarter earnings today, but the results shouldn't be scaring investors in the sector. Li Auto reported a surprise profit for its fourth quarter, which could bode well for what NIO has to say when it reports on Monday, March 1.\nBut investors are knocking back stocks of these high fliers today after extended runs brought high valuations.\nNow what\nLi Auto reported a surprise positive net income of $16.5 million for its fourth quarter. While NIO competes with LI Auto, the companies offer slightly different products. Li's One SUV was designed to serve a specific niche in China. It includes a small gasoline engine onboard that can be used to recharge its batteries, allowing for longer travel between charging stations.\nNIO delivered 7,225 vehicles in January 2021 and 17,353 in its fourth quarter. These represented 352% and 111% year-over-year gains, respectively. NIO recently announced its first luxury sedan, the ET7, which will also have a new longer-range battery option.\nIncluding today's drop, shares have already fallen more than 20% from highs earlier this year. NIO's earnings on Monday could help soothe investor anxiety over the stock's high valuation. But for now, a correction remains under way.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357774968,"gmtCreate":1617318683454,"gmtModify":1634521494033,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Economy booming will lead&nbsp;to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?&nbsp;","listText":"Economy booming will lead&nbsp;to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?&nbsp;","text":"Economy booming will lead to inflation which will force Feb to raise interest yield. Interest rate will hv negative impact on tech stocks. So,it will be a unknown cycle !?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357774968","repostId":"1103381745","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":374,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":352051624,"gmtCreate":1616836935268,"gmtModify":1634523760632,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!&nbsp;","listText":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!&nbsp;","text":"Below $70 will be a v good buy!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/352051624","repostId":"2122472374","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":847,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340989073,"gmtCreate":1617330165492,"gmtModify":1634521391113,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and&nbsp;crypto? ..&nbsp;","listText":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and&nbsp;crypto? ..&nbsp;","text":"If SEC allowing Coinbase to list, what will thenbe the “probability” that US government will ban Bitcoin and crypto? ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/340989073","repostId":"1110671753","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":551,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357370909,"gmtCreate":1617241674301,"gmtModify":1634521856474,"author":{"id":"3565560262275157","authorId":"3565560262275157","name":"Rhythm88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80f5501da2fa10a6c684b9c19b6117a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3565560262275157","idStr":"3565560262275157"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..&nbsp;","listText":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..&nbsp;","text":"Microsoft is a “steady” growth stock that could be added to balance up the portfolio. Thought Facebook is in the fore front of this ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357370909","repostId":"2124271721","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}