+关注
XxBoxX
暂无个人介绍
IP属地:未知
73
关注
5
粉丝
0
主题
0
勋章
主贴
热门
XxBoxX
2021-08-10
Nice
@看遍世界景赚足天下钱:阿里巴巴的瓜和阿里的投资价值
XxBoxX
2021-07-29
Nice
抱歉,原内容已删除
XxBoxX
2021-07-28
Great ariticle, would you like to share it?
@我就是阿硕:
$Support.com(SPRT)$
10.5没空到
XxBoxX
2021-06-23
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-22
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-15
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-14
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-09
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-03
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-06-02
Power
AMC Stock Is Surging Again. How to Make Sense of the Move.<blockquote>AMC股价再次飙升。如何理解这一举动。</blockquote>
XxBoxX
2021-06-02
Nice
RLX Technology Q1 revenues $366.1 million,up 48.2% YOY<blockquote>RLX科技第一季度营收3.661亿美元,同比增长48.2%</blockquote>
XxBoxX
2021-06-02
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-29
Daily
XxBoxX
2021-05-29
Daily
XxBoxX
2021-05-27
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-25
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-25
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-23
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-20
Daily task
XxBoxX
2021-05-18
Daily task
去老虎APP查看更多动态
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3555405988657722","uuid":"3555405988657722","gmtCreate":1592316297102,"gmtModify":1608689141751,"name":"XxBoxX","pinyin":"xxboxx","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":73,"tweetSize":106,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-3","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资合伙人虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到100万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.11%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.75%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":896012542,"gmtCreate":1628533144786,"gmtModify":1631891869629,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/896012542","repostId":"898720355","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":898720355,"gmtCreate":1628522949077,"gmtModify":1628602835328,"author":{"id":"3466684903067182","authorId":"3466684903067182","name":"看遍世界景赚足天下钱","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/036367fd006fdcb94e383902a9d8277a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3466684903067182","idStr":"3466684903067182"},"themes":[],"title":"阿里巴巴的瓜和阿里的投资价值","htmlText":" 最近都吃到阿里的瓜吧,一个女职员,被迫陪酒,然后被客户猥亵被领导**。大领导不管不问,等到事情严重了才出声,CEO直接发怒,一堆人洗牌。 坏的内容大家说得太多了,我还是想说说正面的东西。 一、坏东西都曝光了,也有处理方案,这次不像之前的蒋,铁腕处理。我觉得处理得还是及时深刻的。不过也跟事情的性质有关系,蒋是私德问题,这次是法律问题,刑事案件。 二、阿里作为一个宇宙级大厂,对待这个事件的方式也表明大厂的价值观,对于树清风气有很大的作用。马云之前说的福报不是福报,而这次处理方式,我觉得对于大厂员工来讲,才是可见的一次福报。 三、要说陪酒,中国哪家公司不陪,只是陪的方式不同而已。陪酒不是罪,陪酒后的乱是罪。所以,要阿里背陪酒文化的锅,我觉得不妥。这个锅属于全国所有企业,要背大家一起背。能爆出来、然后有方案去努力解决,我觉得一定程度也是在改良这种文化。 四、有很多人说陪客户,说明是内卷,这个行业不行了,也有说老鼎不反馈,说明包庇了,官僚文化浓厚。我觉得是对的,可以从侧面看出来。但是,大厂哪个没有或多或少的这些问题,不爆出来而已,严重程度不同而已。 所以,最后,我觉得这是短期影响因素,如果说这件事就说阿里烂到家了,我觉得不是。 但是,阿里巴巴从业务上来说确实不是特别乐观,多多对他还是有些威胁,怎么个威胁法","listText":" 最近都吃到阿里的瓜吧,一个女职员,被迫陪酒,然后被客户猥亵被领导**。大领导不管不问,等到事情严重了才出声,CEO直接发怒,一堆人洗牌。 坏的内容大家说得太多了,我还是想说说正面的东西。 一、坏东西都曝光了,也有处理方案,这次不像之前的蒋,铁腕处理。我觉得处理得还是及时深刻的。不过也跟事情的性质有关系,蒋是私德问题,这次是法律问题,刑事案件。 二、阿里作为一个宇宙级大厂,对待这个事件的方式也表明大厂的价值观,对于树清风气有很大的作用。马云之前说的福报不是福报,而这次处理方式,我觉得对于大厂员工来讲,才是可见的一次福报。 三、要说陪酒,中国哪家公司不陪,只是陪的方式不同而已。陪酒不是罪,陪酒后的乱是罪。所以,要阿里背陪酒文化的锅,我觉得不妥。这个锅属于全国所有企业,要背大家一起背。能爆出来、然后有方案去努力解决,我觉得一定程度也是在改良这种文化。 四、有很多人说陪客户,说明是内卷,这个行业不行了,也有说老鼎不反馈,说明包庇了,官僚文化浓厚。我觉得是对的,可以从侧面看出来。但是,大厂哪个没有或多或少的这些问题,不爆出来而已,严重程度不同而已。 所以,最后,我觉得这是短期影响因素,如果说这件事就说阿里烂到家了,我觉得不是。 但是,阿里巴巴从业务上来说确实不是特别乐观,多多对他还是有些威胁,怎么个威胁法","text":"最近都吃到阿里的瓜吧,一个女职员,被迫陪酒,然后被客户猥亵被领导**。大领导不管不问,等到事情严重了才出声,CEO直接发怒,一堆人洗牌。 坏的内容大家说得太多了,我还是想说说正面的东西。 一、坏东西都曝光了,也有处理方案,这次不像之前的蒋,铁腕处理。我觉得处理得还是及时深刻的。不过也跟事情的性质有关系,蒋是私德问题,这次是法律问题,刑事案件。 二、阿里作为一个宇宙级大厂,对待这个事件的方式也表明大厂的价值观,对于树清风气有很大的作用。马云之前说的福报不是福报,而这次处理方式,我觉得对于大厂员工来讲,才是可见的一次福报。 三、要说陪酒,中国哪家公司不陪,只是陪的方式不同而已。陪酒不是罪,陪酒后的乱是罪。所以,要阿里背陪酒文化的锅,我觉得不妥。这个锅属于全国所有企业,要背大家一起背。能爆出来、然后有方案去努力解决,我觉得一定程度也是在改良这种文化。 四、有很多人说陪客户,说明是内卷,这个行业不行了,也有说老鼎不反馈,说明包庇了,官僚文化浓厚。我觉得是对的,可以从侧面看出来。但是,大厂哪个没有或多或少的这些问题,不爆出来而已,严重程度不同而已。 所以,最后,我觉得这是短期影响因素,如果说这件事就说阿里烂到家了,我觉得不是。 但是,阿里巴巴从业务上来说确实不是特别乐观,多多对他还是有些威胁,怎么个威胁法","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38a3fb4c2216591bd96536d48f2a7207","width":"688","height":"688"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/898720355","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801641136,"gmtCreate":1627516402425,"gmtModify":1631891869626,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801641136","repostId":"2155697398","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803354423,"gmtCreate":1627424927762,"gmtModify":1631891869635,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/803354423","repostId":"803382690","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":803382690,"gmtCreate":1627420839210,"gmtModify":1627420839210,"author":{"id":"3483669283508638","authorId":"3483669283508638","name":"我就是阿硕","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef3a6f12848da8815606073e69dae4be","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3483669283508638","idStr":"3483669283508638"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPRT\">$Support.com(SPRT)$</a>10.5没空到","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPRT\">$Support.com(SPRT)$</a>10.5没空到","text":"$Support.com(SPRT)$10.5没空到","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/803382690","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2188,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129550490,"gmtCreate":1624378370610,"gmtModify":1631891869630,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/129550490","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2078,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":120943021,"gmtCreate":1624293490363,"gmtModify":1631891869633,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/120943021","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1831,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":160949203,"gmtCreate":1623770530002,"gmtModify":1631891869635,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/160949203","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2016,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184393703,"gmtCreate":1623683208602,"gmtModify":1631891869637,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/184393703","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2066,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":180977447,"gmtCreate":1623174717089,"gmtModify":1631891869641,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/180977447","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1983,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118286168,"gmtCreate":1622733617454,"gmtModify":1631891869646,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/118286168","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1721,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":113546385,"gmtCreate":1622628912647,"gmtModify":1631888658066,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Power","listText":"Power","text":"Power","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/113546385","repostId":"1188552613","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188552613","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622627641,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1188552613?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-02 17:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Stock Is Surging Again. How to Make Sense of the Move.<blockquote>AMC股价再次飙升。如何理解这一举动。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188552613","media":"Barrons","summary":"AMC Entertainment‘s skyrocketing stock price would be easy to dismiss as just meme-trade madness, th","content":"<p>AMC Entertainment‘s skyrocketing stock price would be easy to dismiss as just meme-trade madness, that social media-fueled investor frenzy that has launched the likes of GameStop and BlackBerry into speculative territory.</p><p><blockquote>AMC院线股价飙升很容易被视为迷因交易疯狂,社交媒体推动的投资者狂热将游戏驿站和黑莓等公司带入了投机领域。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s possible that traditional investors have missed a fundamental change in the movie theater business—and it wouldn’t be the first time.</p><p><blockquote>但传统投资者可能错过了电影院业务的根本性变化——而且这已经不是第一次了。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC (ticker: AMC) surged 23% on Tuesday, closing at $32.04—just off an all-time high of $36.72 set in late May. That puts the movie-theater chain’s market capitalization at roughly $16 billion, more than 15 times what it was in 2018, a record-breaking year at the box office. Shares were up another 34%, to $42.92, in premarket trading Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>AMC(股票代码:AMC)股价周二飙升23%,收于32.04美元,略低于5月底创下的36.72美元的历史高点。这使得这家连锁影院的市值约为160亿美元,是2018年票房破纪录的一年的15倍多。周三盘前交易中,该公司股价又上涨34%,至42.92美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even if investors missed an inflection point, though, the math doesn’t add up. The reason might be that market cap isn’t the right measure. Maybe it’s enterprise value, which is essentially market cap and debt. AMC’s enterprise value is about $26 billion, compared with $6.2 billion or so at the end of 2018.</p><p><blockquote>不过,即使投资者错过了拐点,数学也不成立。原因可能是市值不是正确的衡量标准。也许是企业价值,本质上是市值和债务。AMC的企业价值约为260亿美元,而2018年底为62亿美元左右。</blockquote></p><p> AMC added debt during the pandemic as theaters in the country’s biggest cities were dark for months. And the numbers make it easy to understand why: The U.S. box office in 2020 generated about $2.1 billion in ticket sales, down 81% from the 2018 record of $11.9 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMC在疫情期间增加了债务,因为该国最大城市的影院连续几个月处于黑暗之中。这些数字很容易理解原因:2020年美国票房收入约为21亿美元,比2018年创纪录的119亿美元下降了81%。</blockquote></p><p> So, it seems investors have been vexed by movie theater economics. But it wouldn’t be the first time. The industry essentially went belly up at the turn of the millennium. Regal Cinemas, for instance, declared bankruptcy in 2001.</p><p><blockquote>因此,投资者似乎对电影院经济感到恼火。但这不是第一次了。这个行业在世纪之交基本上破产了。例如,富豪影院于2001年宣布破产。</blockquote></p><p> Back then, the industry had plenty of capacity because of a new theater design—stadium seating that gave a better view of the screen. That shift meant movie theater chains had to renovate or risk losing all their patrons to movie theaters that offered the better view. In the end, too many seats and not enough patrons meant the return on the stadium-seating investments never materialized.</p><p><blockquote>当时,该行业有足够的容量,因为一种新的剧院设计——体育场座位可以更好地观看屏幕。这种转变意味着连锁电影院必须翻新,否则就有可能失去所有顾客到视野更好的电影院。最终,太多的座位和不够的顾客意味着体育场座位投资的回报从未实现。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot was consolidation. With fewer operators, the number of screens stabilized. Between 2002 and 2007, Regal Cinemas became a cash-generating machine because the stock was mispriced. The stock returned 21% a year on average. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average both returned less than 9% a year on average over the same period.</p><p><blockquote>结果是整合。随着操作员的减少,屏幕数量稳定下来。2002年至2007年间,Regal Cinemas因股票定价错误而成为现金产生机器。该股平均每年回报率为21%。同期,标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数的平均年回报率均低于9%。</blockquote></p><p> In those days, Regal Cinema’s enterprise value about $5 billion, or about 50% of total U.S. box office sales. That’s far short of AMC today. Something new has to be different for AMC to be worth it.</p><p><blockquote>当年,富豪影院的企业价值约为50亿美元,约占美国票房总收入的50%。这与今天的AMC相去甚远。新的东西必须与众不同,AMC才值得。</blockquote></p><p> Maybe the movie theater business is going to go through another period of consolidation, which can usher in another golden age of returns. AMC’s Tuesday gains, in fact, were catalyzed by new capital raised so the company could go on the offensive, acquiring defunct chains. Monopolies, after all, can be good for stock returns.</p><p><blockquote>也许电影院业务又要经历一段盘整期,可以迎来又一个回报的黄金时代。事实上,AMC周二的上涨是由筹集的新资金推动的,因此该公司可以继续进攻,收购已倒闭的连锁店。毕竟,垄断有利于股票回报。</blockquote></p><p> If AMC can increase market share and the U.S. box office sales can return to 2018 levels in a few years, total sales at might be $9 billion—$6 billion from tickets and $3 billion from concessions. Sales in 2018 amounted to $5.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>如果AMC能够增加市场份额,并且美国票房销售额能够在几年内恢复到2018年的水平,那么总销售额可能会达到90亿美元——60亿美元来自门票,30亿美元来自特许经营。2018年销售额达55亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Then, with better gross profit margins derived from larger scale, AMC might be able to generate $600 million in free cash flow annually, which puts the stock at about a 4% free cash flow yield. The S&P 500 trades for about a 3% free cash flow yield. The numbers can work—if they’re stretched.</p><p><blockquote>然后,随着规模的扩大带来更好的毛利率,AMC每年可能能够产生6亿美元的自由现金流,这使得该股的自由现金流收益率约为4%。标普500的自由现金流收益率约为3%。这些数字可以发挥作用——如果它们被拉伸的话。</blockquote></p><p> There are problems with this scenario, though. There are lots of ifs and mights—and AMC has never generated cash flow like that in the past. Arriving at $600 million in free cash flow is more about justifying current valuations than predicting what is likely.</p><p><blockquote>不过,这种情况存在问题。有很多如果和可能——AMC过去从未产生过这样的现金流。达到6亿美元的自由现金流更多的是为了证明当前估值的合理性,而不是预测可能发生的情况。</blockquote></p><p> Also, with mergers and acquisitions, AMC market shares might rise, but there are still competitors. Regal Cinemas is still out there, owned by Cineworld Holdings (CINE. London). So is Cinemark (CNK). There’s not a true monopoly.</p><p><blockquote>此外,通过并购,AMC的市场份额可能会上升,但仍然存在竞争对手。富豪影院仍然存在,归电影世界控股公司所有。伦敦)。喜满客(CNK)也是如此。没有真正的垄断。</blockquote></p><p> AMC and its peers have to deal with streaming, too. Windows for exclusive theater showings are shrinking. The pandemic has accelerated that. And if AMC gets too large and demanding for movie makers, the talent can always go to streaming faster, hurting box office sales.</p><p><blockquote>AMC及其同行也必须应对流媒体问题。独家影院放映的窗口正在缩小。疫情加速了这一点。如果AMC变得太大,对电影制作人的要求太高,人才总是可以更快地转向流媒体,从而损害票房销售。</blockquote></p><p> There is also the problem of the peer stocks. They aren’t trading like this is a brave new world for theaters. Cineworld stock is up 484% from its 52-week low, but shares are still off 72% from all-time highs. Cinemark shares are up 222% from their 52-week low. They are down 47% from their all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>还有同行股票的问题。他们并不认为这是剧院的一个勇敢的新世界。Cineworld股价较52周低点上涨484%,但仍较历史高点下跌72%。喜满客股价较52周低点上涨222%。它们比历史高点下跌了47%。</blockquote></p><p> AMC stock, again, is up almost 1,600% from its 52-week low and is down just 13% from its May all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价再次较52周低点上涨近1,600%,较5月份历史高点仅下跌13%。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street just doesn’t see the potential either. Nine analysts cover the stock. The average analyst price target is about $5. Before the pandemic, the average analyst price target was $15. But there were fewer shares back then. The old target enterprise value was roughly $7 billion. It’s tough to get from $7 billion to $26 billion predicting better margins.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街也没有看到潜力。九名分析师关注该股。分析师平均目标价约为5美元。在疫情爆发之前,分析师的平均目标价为15美元。但当时股票较少。旧的目标企业价值约为70亿美元。很难从70亿美元增加到260亿美元来预测更好的利润率。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Analysts do have positive free cash flow modeled, though–$13 million in 2022 and $90 million in 2023. That’s a long way from $600 million.</p><p><blockquote>不过,分析师确实模拟了正自由现金流——2022年为1300万美元,2023年为9000万美元。这距离6亿美元还有很长的路要走。</blockquote></p><p> And that’s just another way of saying that AMC bulls are a long way from making the math work.</p><p><blockquote>这只是AMC多头距离实现数学计算还有很长的路要走的另一种说法。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Stock Is Surging Again. How to Make Sense of the Move.<blockquote>AMC股价再次飙升。如何理解这一举动。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Stock Is Surging Again. How to Make Sense of the Move.<blockquote>AMC股价再次飙升。如何理解这一举动。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-02 17:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>AMC Entertainment‘s skyrocketing stock price would be easy to dismiss as just meme-trade madness, that social media-fueled investor frenzy that has launched the likes of GameStop and BlackBerry into speculative territory.</p><p><blockquote>AMC院线股价飙升很容易被视为迷因交易疯狂,社交媒体推动的投资者狂热将游戏驿站和黑莓等公司带入了投机领域。</blockquote></p><p> But it’s possible that traditional investors have missed a fundamental change in the movie theater business—and it wouldn’t be the first time.</p><p><blockquote>但传统投资者可能错过了电影院业务的根本性变化——而且这已经不是第一次了。</blockquote></p><p> Shares of AMC (ticker: AMC) surged 23% on Tuesday, closing at $32.04—just off an all-time high of $36.72 set in late May. That puts the movie-theater chain’s market capitalization at roughly $16 billion, more than 15 times what it was in 2018, a record-breaking year at the box office. Shares were up another 34%, to $42.92, in premarket trading Wednesday.</p><p><blockquote>AMC(股票代码:AMC)股价周二飙升23%,收于32.04美元,略低于5月底创下的36.72美元的历史高点。这使得这家连锁影院的市值约为160亿美元,是2018年票房破纪录的一年的15倍多。周三盘前交易中,该公司股价又上涨34%,至42.92美元。</blockquote></p><p> Even if investors missed an inflection point, though, the math doesn’t add up. The reason might be that market cap isn’t the right measure. Maybe it’s enterprise value, which is essentially market cap and debt. AMC’s enterprise value is about $26 billion, compared with $6.2 billion or so at the end of 2018.</p><p><blockquote>不过,即使投资者错过了拐点,数学也不成立。原因可能是市值不是正确的衡量标准。也许是企业价值,本质上是市值和债务。AMC的企业价值约为260亿美元,而2018年底为62亿美元左右。</blockquote></p><p> AMC added debt during the pandemic as theaters in the country’s biggest cities were dark for months. And the numbers make it easy to understand why: The U.S. box office in 2020 generated about $2.1 billion in ticket sales, down 81% from the 2018 record of $11.9 billion.</p><p><blockquote>AMC在疫情期间增加了债务,因为该国最大城市的影院连续几个月处于黑暗之中。这些数字很容易理解原因:2020年美国票房收入约为21亿美元,比2018年创纪录的119亿美元下降了81%。</blockquote></p><p> So, it seems investors have been vexed by movie theater economics. But it wouldn’t be the first time. The industry essentially went belly up at the turn of the millennium. Regal Cinemas, for instance, declared bankruptcy in 2001.</p><p><blockquote>因此,投资者似乎对电影院经济感到恼火。但这不是第一次了。这个行业在世纪之交基本上破产了。例如,富豪影院于2001年宣布破产。</blockquote></p><p> Back then, the industry had plenty of capacity because of a new theater design—stadium seating that gave a better view of the screen. That shift meant movie theater chains had to renovate or risk losing all their patrons to movie theaters that offered the better view. In the end, too many seats and not enough patrons meant the return on the stadium-seating investments never materialized.</p><p><blockquote>当时,该行业有足够的容量,因为一种新的剧院设计——体育场座位可以更好地观看屏幕。这种转变意味着连锁电影院必须翻新,否则就有可能失去所有顾客到视野更好的电影院。最终,太多的座位和不够的顾客意味着体育场座位投资的回报从未实现。</blockquote></p><p> The upshot was consolidation. With fewer operators, the number of screens stabilized. Between 2002 and 2007, Regal Cinemas became a cash-generating machine because the stock was mispriced. The stock returned 21% a year on average. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average both returned less than 9% a year on average over the same period.</p><p><blockquote>结果是整合。随着操作员的减少,屏幕数量稳定下来。2002年至2007年间,Regal Cinemas因股票定价错误而成为现金产生机器。该股平均每年回报率为21%。同期,标普500和道琼斯工业平均指数的平均年回报率均低于9%。</blockquote></p><p> In those days, Regal Cinema’s enterprise value about $5 billion, or about 50% of total U.S. box office sales. That’s far short of AMC today. Something new has to be different for AMC to be worth it.</p><p><blockquote>当年,富豪影院的企业价值约为50亿美元,约占美国票房总收入的50%。这与今天的AMC相去甚远。新的东西必须与众不同,AMC才值得。</blockquote></p><p> Maybe the movie theater business is going to go through another period of consolidation, which can usher in another golden age of returns. AMC’s Tuesday gains, in fact, were catalyzed by new capital raised so the company could go on the offensive, acquiring defunct chains. Monopolies, after all, can be good for stock returns.</p><p><blockquote>也许电影院业务又要经历一段盘整期,可以迎来又一个回报的黄金时代。事实上,AMC周二的上涨是由筹集的新资金推动的,因此该公司可以继续进攻,收购已倒闭的连锁店。毕竟,垄断有利于股票回报。</blockquote></p><p> If AMC can increase market share and the U.S. box office sales can return to 2018 levels in a few years, total sales at might be $9 billion—$6 billion from tickets and $3 billion from concessions. Sales in 2018 amounted to $5.5 billion.</p><p><blockquote>如果AMC能够增加市场份额,并且美国票房销售额能够在几年内恢复到2018年的水平,那么总销售额可能会达到90亿美元——60亿美元来自门票,30亿美元来自特许经营。2018年销售额达55亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> Then, with better gross profit margins derived from larger scale, AMC might be able to generate $600 million in free cash flow annually, which puts the stock at about a 4% free cash flow yield. The S&P 500 trades for about a 3% free cash flow yield. The numbers can work—if they’re stretched.</p><p><blockquote>然后,随着规模的扩大带来更好的毛利率,AMC每年可能能够产生6亿美元的自由现金流,这使得该股的自由现金流收益率约为4%。标普500的自由现金流收益率约为3%。这些数字可以发挥作用——如果它们被拉伸的话。</blockquote></p><p> There are problems with this scenario, though. There are lots of ifs and mights—and AMC has never generated cash flow like that in the past. Arriving at $600 million in free cash flow is more about justifying current valuations than predicting what is likely.</p><p><blockquote>不过,这种情况存在问题。有很多如果和可能——AMC过去从未产生过这样的现金流。达到6亿美元的自由现金流更多的是为了证明当前估值的合理性,而不是预测可能发生的情况。</blockquote></p><p> Also, with mergers and acquisitions, AMC market shares might rise, but there are still competitors. Regal Cinemas is still out there, owned by Cineworld Holdings (CINE. London). So is Cinemark (CNK). There’s not a true monopoly.</p><p><blockquote>此外,通过并购,AMC的市场份额可能会上升,但仍然存在竞争对手。富豪影院仍然存在,归电影世界控股公司所有。伦敦)。喜满客(CNK)也是如此。没有真正的垄断。</blockquote></p><p> AMC and its peers have to deal with streaming, too. Windows for exclusive theater showings are shrinking. The pandemic has accelerated that. And if AMC gets too large and demanding for movie makers, the talent can always go to streaming faster, hurting box office sales.</p><p><blockquote>AMC及其同行也必须应对流媒体问题。独家影院放映的窗口正在缩小。疫情加速了这一点。如果AMC变得太大,对电影制作人的要求太高,人才总是可以更快地转向流媒体,从而损害票房销售。</blockquote></p><p> There is also the problem of the peer stocks. They aren’t trading like this is a brave new world for theaters. Cineworld stock is up 484% from its 52-week low, but shares are still off 72% from all-time highs. Cinemark shares are up 222% from their 52-week low. They are down 47% from their all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>还有同行股票的问题。他们并不认为这是剧院的一个勇敢的新世界。Cineworld股价较52周低点上涨484%,但仍较历史高点下跌72%。喜满客股价较52周低点上涨222%。它们比历史高点下跌了47%。</blockquote></p><p> AMC stock, again, is up almost 1,600% from its 52-week low and is down just 13% from its May all-time high.</p><p><blockquote>AMC股价再次较52周低点上涨近1,600%,较5月份历史高点仅下跌13%。</blockquote></p><p> Wall Street just doesn’t see the potential either. Nine analysts cover the stock. The average analyst price target is about $5. Before the pandemic, the average analyst price target was $15. But there were fewer shares back then. The old target enterprise value was roughly $7 billion. It’s tough to get from $7 billion to $26 billion predicting better margins.</p><p><blockquote>华尔街也没有看到潜力。九名分析师关注该股。分析师平均目标价约为5美元。在疫情爆发之前,分析师的平均目标价为15美元。但当时股票较少。旧的目标企业价值约为70亿美元。很难从70亿美元增加到260亿美元来预测更好的利润率。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Analysts do have positive free cash flow modeled, though–$13 million in 2022 and $90 million in 2023. That’s a long way from $600 million.</p><p><blockquote>不过,分析师确实模拟了正自由现金流——2022年为1300万美元,2023年为9000万美元。这距离6亿美元还有很长的路要走。</blockquote></p><p> And that’s just another way of saying that AMC bulls are a long way from making the math work.</p><p><blockquote>这只是AMC多头距离实现数学计算还有很长的路要走的另一种说法。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amc-rockets-higher-is-it-worth-it-maybe-51622594691?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amc-rockets-higher-is-it-worth-it-maybe-51622594691?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188552613","content_text":"AMC Entertainment‘s skyrocketing stock price would be easy to dismiss as just meme-trade madness, that social media-fueled investor frenzy that has launched the likes of GameStop and BlackBerry into speculative territory.\nBut it’s possible that traditional investors have missed a fundamental change in the movie theater business—and it wouldn’t be the first time.\nShares of AMC (ticker: AMC) surged 23% on Tuesday, closing at $32.04—just off an all-time high of $36.72 set in late May. That puts the movie-theater chain’s market capitalization at roughly $16 billion, more than 15 times what it was in 2018, a record-breaking year at the box office. Shares were up another 34%, to $42.92, in premarket trading Wednesday.\nEven if investors missed an inflection point, though, the math doesn’t add up. The reason might be that market cap isn’t the right measure. Maybe it’s enterprise value, which is essentially market cap and debt. AMC’s enterprise value is about $26 billion, compared with $6.2 billion or so at the end of 2018.\nAMC added debt during the pandemic as theaters in the country’s biggest cities were dark for months. And the numbers make it easy to understand why: The U.S. box office in 2020 generated about $2.1 billion in ticket sales, down 81% from the 2018 record of $11.9 billion.\nSo, it seems investors have been vexed by movie theater economics. But it wouldn’t be the first time. The industry essentially went belly up at the turn of the millennium. Regal Cinemas, for instance, declared bankruptcy in 2001.\nBack then, the industry had plenty of capacity because of a new theater design—stadium seating that gave a better view of the screen. That shift meant movie theater chains had to renovate or risk losing all their patrons to movie theaters that offered the better view. In the end, too many seats and not enough patrons meant the return on the stadium-seating investments never materialized.\nThe upshot was consolidation. With fewer operators, the number of screens stabilized. Between 2002 and 2007, Regal Cinemas became a cash-generating machine because the stock was mispriced. The stock returned 21% a year on average. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average both returned less than 9% a year on average over the same period.\nIn those days, Regal Cinema’s enterprise value about $5 billion, or about 50% of total U.S. box office sales. That’s far short of AMC today. Something new has to be different for AMC to be worth it.\nMaybe the movie theater business is going to go through another period of consolidation, which can usher in another golden age of returns. AMC’s Tuesday gains, in fact, were catalyzed by new capital raised so the company could go on the offensive, acquiring defunct chains. Monopolies, after all, can be good for stock returns.\nIf AMC can increase market share and the U.S. box office sales can return to 2018 levels in a few years, total sales at might be $9 billion—$6 billion from tickets and $3 billion from concessions. Sales in 2018 amounted to $5.5 billion.\nThen, with better gross profit margins derived from larger scale, AMC might be able to generate $600 million in free cash flow annually, which puts the stock at about a 4% free cash flow yield. The S&P 500 trades for about a 3% free cash flow yield. The numbers can work—if they’re stretched.\nThere are problems with this scenario, though. There are lots of ifs and mights—and AMC has never generated cash flow like that in the past. Arriving at $600 million in free cash flow is more about justifying current valuations than predicting what is likely.\nAlso, with mergers and acquisitions, AMC market shares might rise, but there are still competitors. Regal Cinemas is still out there, owned by Cineworld Holdings (CINE. London). So is Cinemark (CNK). There’s not a true monopoly.\nAMC and its peers have to deal with streaming, too. Windows for exclusive theater showings are shrinking. The pandemic has accelerated that. And if AMC gets too large and demanding for movie makers, the talent can always go to streaming faster, hurting box office sales.\nThere is also the problem of the peer stocks. They aren’t trading like this is a brave new world for theaters. Cineworld stock is up 484% from its 52-week low, but shares are still off 72% from all-time highs. Cinemark shares are up 222% from their 52-week low. They are down 47% from their all-time high.\nAMC stock, again, is up almost 1,600% from its 52-week low and is down just 13% from its May all-time high.\nWall Street just doesn’t see the potential either. Nine analysts cover the stock. The average analyst price target is about $5. Before the pandemic, the average analyst price target was $15. But there were fewer shares back then. The old target enterprise value was roughly $7 billion. It’s tough to get from $7 billion to $26 billion predicting better margins.\nAnalysts do have positive free cash flow modeled, though–$13 million in 2022 and $90 million in 2023. That’s a long way from $600 million.\nAnd that’s just another way of saying that AMC bulls are a long way from making the math work.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1483,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":113540439,"gmtCreate":1622628715321,"gmtModify":1631891869650,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/113540439","repostId":"1104336218","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104336218","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1622628284,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1104336218?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-02 18:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"RLX Technology Q1 revenues $366.1 million,up 48.2% YOY<blockquote>RLX科技第一季度营收3.661亿美元,同比增长48.2%</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104336218","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"RLX Technology Inc., a leading branded e-vapor company in China, today announced its unaudited finan","content":"<p>RLX Technology Inc., a leading branded e-vapor company in China, today announced its unaudited financial results for the first quarter endedMarch 31, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>国内领先的品牌电子烟公司RLX科技公司今天公布了截至2021年3月31日的第一季度未经审计的财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>First Quarter 2021 Financial Highlights</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>2021年第一季度财务摘要</u></b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li><b>Net revenues</b> were RMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million), representing an increase of 48.2% from RMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>Gross margin</b> was 46.0%, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>GAAP</b> <b>netloss</b> was RMB267.0 million(US$40.8 million), compared withRMB236.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>Non-GAAP net income[1]</b>was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million), representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li></ul>RLX Technology stock surged 5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>净收入</b>为人民币23.985亿元(3.661亿美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币16.185亿元增长48.2%。</li><li><b>毛利率</b>为46.0%,而2020年第四季度为42.9%。</li><li><b>GAAP</b> <b>净损失</b>为人民币2.67亿元(4080万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币2.367亿元。</li><li><b>非公认会计准则净利润[1]</b>为人民币6.105亿元(9320万美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币4.193亿元增长45.6%。</li></ul>RLX科技股价在盘前交易中飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8e41217bab21ae2e0b69073c4d5e48b\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>\"2021 began, on a solid note, with strong growth in key performance metrics of our business,\" said Ms.Ying (Kate) Wang, Co-founder, Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of RLX Technology. \"Specifically, our expansion in distribution network fueled a strong sequential growth, further demonstrating sustained user demand for our e-vapor product portfolio.\"</p><p><blockquote>RLX科技联合创始人、董事会主席兼首席执行官王英女士表示:“2021年开局良好,我们业务的关键绩效指标强劲增长。”“具体来说,我们分销网络的扩张推动了强劲的环比增长,进一步证明了用户对我们电子蒸汽产品组合的持续需求。”</blockquote></p><p>\"As the go-to brand of e-vapor products inChina, we remain dedicated to investing in deepening our scientific research, improving our technology and product development, expanding our distribution network and retail outlets as well as enhancing supply chain and production capabilities. In the first quarter, we opened our<i>Quality Lab</i>to further strengthen our quality assurance and control capabilities, and started developing our second and third exclusive production plants to enhance our production capabilities. We believe we are well positioned to further capture the growth potential in the e-vapor industry inChina,\" Ms. Wang concluded.</p><p><blockquote>“作为中国电子烟产品的首选品牌,我们继续致力于投资深化我们的科学研究、改进我们的技术和产品开发、扩大我们的分销网络和零售店,以及增强供应链和生产能力。<i>质量实验室</i>进一步加强我们的质量保证和控制能力,并开始开发我们的第二个和第三个独家生产工厂,以提高我们的生产能力。我们相信,我们处于有利地位,可以进一步抓住中国电子蒸汽行业的增长潜力。”王女士总结道。</blockquote></p><p>\"Our robust results in the first quarter of 2021 exemplify our strong capabilities in meeting user demands for reliable, innovative and trustworthy products,\" said Mr.Chao Lu, Chief Financial Officer. \"Building on rapid revenue growth and continued efforts in improving operating leverage, our gross margin and non-GAAP net margin have remained steady in the first quarter. We will continue to pursue user value creation by enhancing our suite of product offerings and strengthening our brand leadership in the market.\"</p><p><blockquote>“我们2021年第一季度的强劲业绩证明了我们在满足用户对可靠、创新和值得信赖的产品的需求方面的强大能力,”首席财务官Chao Lu先生表示。“基于收入的快速增长和持续努力提高运营杠杆,我们的毛利率和非公认会计准则净利润率在第一季度保持稳定。我们将继续通过增强我们的产品组合和加强我们的品牌来追求用户价值创造在市场上的领导地位。”</blockquote></p><p><b><u>First Quarter 2021 Unaudited Financial Results</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>2021年第一季度未经审计的财务业绩</u></b></blockquote></p><p><b>Net revenues</b> increased by 48.2% toRMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net revenues from sales to offline distributors, which was mainly attributable to the expansion of the Company's distribution and retail network.</p><p><blockquote><b>净收入</b>从2020年第四季度的人民币16.185亿元增长48.2%至2021年第一季度的人民币23.985亿元(3.661亿美元)。该增加主要是由于向线下分销商销售的净收入增加,这主要归因于公司分销和零售网络的扩张。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gross profit</b> increased by 59.1% to RMB1,104.1 million (US$168.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB694.1 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>毛利</b>从2020年第四季度的人民币6.941亿元增长59.1%至2021年第一季度的人民币11.041亿元(1.685亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gross margin</b> increased to 46.0% in the first quarter of 2021, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>毛利率</b>2021年第一季度增至46.0%,而2020年第四季度为42.9%。</blockquote></p><p><b>Operating expenses</b> wereRMB1,216.0 million(US$185.6 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 42.6% fromRMB852.6 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>营业费用</b>2021年第一季度为12.16亿元人民币(1.856亿美元),较2020年第四季度的8.526亿元人民币增长42.6%。</blockquote></p><p><i>Selling expenses</i>increased by 48.2% to RMB291.5 million (US$44.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB196.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was mainly driven by (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, (ii) an increase in branding material expenses, and (iii) an increase in shipping expenses.</p><p><blockquote><i>销售费用</i>从2020年第四季度的人民币1.967亿元增长48.2%至2021年第一季度的人民币2.915亿元(4450万美元)。该增加主要由于(i)薪金及福利增加、(ii)品牌材料开支增加及(iii)运输开支增加所致。</blockquote></p><p><i>General and administrative expenses</i> increased by 59.5% toRMB712.8 million(US$108.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB447.0 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, and (ii) an increase in share-based compensation expenses, partially offset by a decrease in legal and other consulting fees.</p><p><blockquote><i>一般及行政开支</i>从2020年第四季度的4.47亿元人民币增长59.5%至2021年第一季度的7.128亿元人民币(1.088亿美元)。该增加主要由于(i)薪金及福利增加,及(ii)以股份为基础的薪酬开支增加,惟部分被法律及其他谘询费用减少所抵销。</blockquote></p><p><i>Research and development expenses</i>increased by 1.3% to RMB211.6 million (US$32.3 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB208.9 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, partially offset by (i) a decrease in share-based compensation expenses, and (ii) a decrease in material expenses.</p><p><blockquote><i>研发费用</i>从2020年第四季度的人民币2.089亿元增长1.3%至2021年第一季度的人民币2.116亿元(3230万美元)。该增加主要由于薪金及福利增加所致,惟部分被(i)以股份为基础的薪酬开支减少及(ii)重大开支减少所抵销。</blockquote></p><p>Share-based compensation expenses recognized in selling expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in total wereRMB877.5million (US$133.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021 andRMB656.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>2021年第一季度,销售费用、一般及管理费用以及研发费用中确认的股份薪酬费用总额为人民币8.775亿元(1.339亿美元),2020年第四季度为人民币6.561亿元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p><b>Loss from operations</b> was RMB111.9 million (US$17.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB158.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>经营亏损</b>2021年第一季度为人民币1.119亿元(1710万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币1.585亿元。</blockquote></p><p><b>Income tax expense</b> wasRMB176.3 million (US$26.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB110.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to an increase in taxable income.</p><p><blockquote><b>所得税费用</b>2021年第一季度为人民币1.763亿元(2690万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币1.106亿元,主要是由于应税收入增加。</blockquote></p><p><b>GAAPnet loss</b> was RMB267.0 million (US$40.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB236.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>GAAPnet损失</b>2021年第一季度为人民币2.670亿元(4080万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币2.367亿元。</blockquote></p><p><b>Non-GAAP net income</b> was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>非公认会计准则净利润</b>2021年第一季度为人民币6.105亿元(9320万美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币4.193亿元增长45.6%。</blockquote></p><p><b>GAAP basic and diluted net loss per American depositary share (\"ADS\")</b> were bothRMB0.174(US$0.027)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.165in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>GAAP每股美国存托股(“ADS”)基本和摊薄净亏损</b>2021年第一季度均为0.174元人民币(0.027美元),而2020年第四季度为0.165元人民币。</blockquote></p><p><b>Non-GAAP basic and diluted netincome per ADS[2]</b>were both RMB0.398(US$0.061)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.292in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>非GAAP每股美国存托凭证基本和摊薄净收入[2]</b>2021年第一季度均为人民币0.398元(0.061美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币0.292元。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>Balance Sheet</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>资产负债表</u></b></blockquote></p><p>As ofMarch 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term bank deposits, short-term investments and long-term bank deposits ofRMB14,437.8 million (US$2,203.6 million), compared toRMB3,421.4 millionas ofDecember 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to net proceeds raised in the Company's initial public offering inJanuary 2021. As of March 31, 2021, approximatelyUS$1,647.2 million(RMB10,792.2 million) was denominated in U.S. dollars.</p><p><blockquote>截至2021年3月31日,公司的现金及现金等价物、限制性现金、短期银行存款、短期投资和长期银行存款为人民币144.378亿元(22.036亿美元),而截至2020年12月31日为人民币34.214亿元。该增加主要是由于公司2021年1月首次公开募股筹集的所得款项净额所致。截至2021年3月31日,约16.472亿美元(人民币107.922亿元)以美元计价。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>Business Outlook</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>业务展望</u></b></blockquote></p><p>For the second quarter of 2021, the Company currently expects net revenues to exceedRMB2,850 million, and expects non-GAAP net income to exceedRMB720 million. The Company's expected GAAP net income will include share-based compensation expenses which depend on the Company's share price and are not available without unreasonable efforts. The Company currently also expects gross margin to remain steady.</p><p><blockquote>对于2021年第二季度,公司目前预计净收入将超过人民币28.5亿元,预计非公认会计准则净利润将超过人民币7.2亿元。公司的预期GAAP净利润将包括基于股份的薪酬费用,这些费用取决于公司的股价,如果不付出不合理的努力就无法获得。该公司目前还预计毛利率将保持稳定。</blockquote></p><p>The above outlook is based on the current market conditions, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and reflects the Company's preliminary estimates of market and operating conditions, and users' demand, which are all subject to change. Please refer to \"Safe Harbor Statement\" in this press release for risks associated with forward-looking statements.</p><p><blockquote>上述展望基于当前市场状况,包括与COVID-19大流行相关的市场状况,反映了公司对市场和运营状况以及用户需求的初步估计,这些都可能发生变化。有关与前瞻性陈述相关的风险,请参阅本新闻稿中的“安全港声明”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>RLX Technology Q1 revenues $366.1 million,up 48.2% YOY<blockquote>RLX科技第一季度营收3.661亿美元,同比增长48.2%</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRLX Technology Q1 revenues $366.1 million,up 48.2% YOY<blockquote>RLX科技第一季度营收3.661亿美元,同比增长48.2%</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-02 18:04</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>RLX Technology Inc., a leading branded e-vapor company in China, today announced its unaudited financial results for the first quarter endedMarch 31, 2021.</p><p><blockquote>国内领先的品牌电子烟公司RLX科技公司今天公布了截至2021年3月31日的第一季度未经审计的财务业绩。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>First Quarter 2021 Financial Highlights</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>2021年第一季度财务摘要</u></b></blockquote></p><p><ul><li><b>Net revenues</b> were RMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million), representing an increase of 48.2% from RMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>Gross margin</b> was 46.0%, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>GAAP</b> <b>netloss</b> was RMB267.0 million(US$40.8 million), compared withRMB236.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li><li><b>Non-GAAP net income[1]</b>was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million), representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</li></ul>RLX Technology stock surged 5% in premarket trading.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li><b>净收入</b>为人民币23.985亿元(3.661亿美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币16.185亿元增长48.2%。</li><li><b>毛利率</b>为46.0%,而2020年第四季度为42.9%。</li><li><b>GAAP</b> <b>净损失</b>为人民币2.67亿元(4080万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币2.367亿元。</li><li><b>非公认会计准则净利润[1]</b>为人民币6.105亿元(9320万美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币4.193亿元增长45.6%。</li></ul>RLX科技股价在盘前交易中飙升5%。</blockquote></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8e41217bab21ae2e0b69073c4d5e48b\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p>\"2021 began, on a solid note, with strong growth in key performance metrics of our business,\" said Ms.Ying (Kate) Wang, Co-founder, Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of RLX Technology. \"Specifically, our expansion in distribution network fueled a strong sequential growth, further demonstrating sustained user demand for our e-vapor product portfolio.\"</p><p><blockquote>RLX科技联合创始人、董事会主席兼首席执行官王英女士表示:“2021年开局良好,我们业务的关键绩效指标强劲增长。”“具体来说,我们分销网络的扩张推动了强劲的环比增长,进一步证明了用户对我们电子蒸汽产品组合的持续需求。”</blockquote></p><p>\"As the go-to brand of e-vapor products inChina, we remain dedicated to investing in deepening our scientific research, improving our technology and product development, expanding our distribution network and retail outlets as well as enhancing supply chain and production capabilities. In the first quarter, we opened our<i>Quality Lab</i>to further strengthen our quality assurance and control capabilities, and started developing our second and third exclusive production plants to enhance our production capabilities. We believe we are well positioned to further capture the growth potential in the e-vapor industry inChina,\" Ms. Wang concluded.</p><p><blockquote>“作为中国电子烟产品的首选品牌,我们继续致力于投资深化我们的科学研究、改进我们的技术和产品开发、扩大我们的分销网络和零售店,以及增强供应链和生产能力。<i>质量实验室</i>进一步加强我们的质量保证和控制能力,并开始开发我们的第二个和第三个独家生产工厂,以提高我们的生产能力。我们相信,我们处于有利地位,可以进一步抓住中国电子蒸汽行业的增长潜力。”王女士总结道。</blockquote></p><p>\"Our robust results in the first quarter of 2021 exemplify our strong capabilities in meeting user demands for reliable, innovative and trustworthy products,\" said Mr.Chao Lu, Chief Financial Officer. \"Building on rapid revenue growth and continued efforts in improving operating leverage, our gross margin and non-GAAP net margin have remained steady in the first quarter. We will continue to pursue user value creation by enhancing our suite of product offerings and strengthening our brand leadership in the market.\"</p><p><blockquote>“我们2021年第一季度的强劲业绩证明了我们在满足用户对可靠、创新和值得信赖的产品的需求方面的强大能力,”首席财务官Chao Lu先生表示。“基于收入的快速增长和持续努力提高运营杠杆,我们的毛利率和非公认会计准则净利润率在第一季度保持稳定。我们将继续通过增强我们的产品组合和加强我们的品牌来追求用户价值创造在市场上的领导地位。”</blockquote></p><p><b><u>First Quarter 2021 Unaudited Financial Results</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>2021年第一季度未经审计的财务业绩</u></b></blockquote></p><p><b>Net revenues</b> increased by 48.2% toRMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net revenues from sales to offline distributors, which was mainly attributable to the expansion of the Company's distribution and retail network.</p><p><blockquote><b>净收入</b>从2020年第四季度的人民币16.185亿元增长48.2%至2021年第一季度的人民币23.985亿元(3.661亿美元)。该增加主要是由于向线下分销商销售的净收入增加,这主要归因于公司分销和零售网络的扩张。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gross profit</b> increased by 59.1% to RMB1,104.1 million (US$168.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB694.1 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>毛利</b>从2020年第四季度的人民币6.941亿元增长59.1%至2021年第一季度的人民币11.041亿元(1.685亿美元)。</blockquote></p><p><b>Gross margin</b> increased to 46.0% in the first quarter of 2021, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>毛利率</b>2021年第一季度增至46.0%,而2020年第四季度为42.9%。</blockquote></p><p><b>Operating expenses</b> wereRMB1,216.0 million(US$185.6 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 42.6% fromRMB852.6 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>营业费用</b>2021年第一季度为12.16亿元人民币(1.856亿美元),较2020年第四季度的8.526亿元人民币增长42.6%。</blockquote></p><p><i>Selling expenses</i>increased by 48.2% to RMB291.5 million (US$44.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB196.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was mainly driven by (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, (ii) an increase in branding material expenses, and (iii) an increase in shipping expenses.</p><p><blockquote><i>销售费用</i>从2020年第四季度的人民币1.967亿元增长48.2%至2021年第一季度的人民币2.915亿元(4450万美元)。该增加主要由于(i)薪金及福利增加、(ii)品牌材料开支增加及(iii)运输开支增加所致。</blockquote></p><p><i>General and administrative expenses</i> increased by 59.5% toRMB712.8 million(US$108.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB447.0 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, and (ii) an increase in share-based compensation expenses, partially offset by a decrease in legal and other consulting fees.</p><p><blockquote><i>一般及行政开支</i>从2020年第四季度的4.47亿元人民币增长59.5%至2021年第一季度的7.128亿元人民币(1.088亿美元)。该增加主要由于(i)薪金及福利增加,及(ii)以股份为基础的薪酬开支增加,惟部分被法律及其他谘询费用减少所抵销。</blockquote></p><p><i>Research and development expenses</i>increased by 1.3% to RMB211.6 million (US$32.3 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB208.9 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, partially offset by (i) a decrease in share-based compensation expenses, and (ii) a decrease in material expenses.</p><p><blockquote><i>研发费用</i>从2020年第四季度的人民币2.089亿元增长1.3%至2021年第一季度的人民币2.116亿元(3230万美元)。该增加主要由于薪金及福利增加所致,惟部分被(i)以股份为基础的薪酬开支减少及(ii)重大开支减少所抵销。</blockquote></p><p>Share-based compensation expenses recognized in selling expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in total wereRMB877.5million (US$133.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021 andRMB656.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote>2021年第一季度,销售费用、一般及管理费用以及研发费用中确认的股份薪酬费用总额为人民币8.775亿元(1.339亿美元),2020年第四季度为人民币6.561亿元。</blockquote></p><p></p><p><b>Loss from operations</b> was RMB111.9 million (US$17.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB158.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>经营亏损</b>2021年第一季度为人民币1.119亿元(1710万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币1.585亿元。</blockquote></p><p><b>Income tax expense</b> wasRMB176.3 million (US$26.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB110.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to an increase in taxable income.</p><p><blockquote><b>所得税费用</b>2021年第一季度为人民币1.763亿元(2690万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币1.106亿元,主要是由于应税收入增加。</blockquote></p><p><b>GAAPnet loss</b> was RMB267.0 million (US$40.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB236.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>GAAPnet损失</b>2021年第一季度为人民币2.670亿元(4080万美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币2.367亿元。</blockquote></p><p><b>Non-GAAP net income</b> was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>非公认会计准则净利润</b>2021年第一季度为人民币6.105亿元(9320万美元),较2020年第四季度的人民币4.193亿元增长45.6%。</blockquote></p><p><b>GAAP basic and diluted net loss per American depositary share (\"ADS\")</b> were bothRMB0.174(US$0.027)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.165in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>GAAP每股美国存托股(“ADS”)基本和摊薄净亏损</b>2021年第一季度均为0.174元人民币(0.027美元),而2020年第四季度为0.165元人民币。</blockquote></p><p><b>Non-GAAP basic and diluted netincome per ADS[2]</b>were both RMB0.398(US$0.061)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.292in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>非GAAP每股美国存托凭证基本和摊薄净收入[2]</b>2021年第一季度均为人民币0.398元(0.061美元),而2020年第四季度为人民币0.292元。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>Balance Sheet</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>资产负债表</u></b></blockquote></p><p>As ofMarch 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term bank deposits, short-term investments and long-term bank deposits ofRMB14,437.8 million (US$2,203.6 million), compared toRMB3,421.4 millionas ofDecember 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to net proceeds raised in the Company's initial public offering inJanuary 2021. As of March 31, 2021, approximatelyUS$1,647.2 million(RMB10,792.2 million) was denominated in U.S. dollars.</p><p><blockquote>截至2021年3月31日,公司的现金及现金等价物、限制性现金、短期银行存款、短期投资和长期银行存款为人民币144.378亿元(22.036亿美元),而截至2020年12月31日为人民币34.214亿元。该增加主要是由于公司2021年1月首次公开募股筹集的所得款项净额所致。截至2021年3月31日,约16.472亿美元(人民币107.922亿元)以美元计价。</blockquote></p><p><b><u>Business Outlook</u></b></p><p><blockquote><b><u>业务展望</u></b></blockquote></p><p>For the second quarter of 2021, the Company currently expects net revenues to exceedRMB2,850 million, and expects non-GAAP net income to exceedRMB720 million. The Company's expected GAAP net income will include share-based compensation expenses which depend on the Company's share price and are not available without unreasonable efforts. The Company currently also expects gross margin to remain steady.</p><p><blockquote>对于2021年第二季度,公司目前预计净收入将超过人民币28.5亿元,预计非公认会计准则净利润将超过人民币7.2亿元。公司的预期GAAP净利润将包括基于股份的薪酬费用,这些费用取决于公司的股价,如果不付出不合理的努力就无法获得。该公司目前还预计毛利率将保持稳定。</blockquote></p><p>The above outlook is based on the current market conditions, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and reflects the Company's preliminary estimates of market and operating conditions, and users' demand, which are all subject to change. Please refer to \"Safe Harbor Statement\" in this press release for risks associated with forward-looking statements.</p><p><blockquote>上述展望基于当前市场状况,包括与COVID-19大流行相关的市场状况,反映了公司对市场和运营状况以及用户需求的初步估计,这些都可能发生变化。有关与前瞻性陈述相关的风险,请参阅本新闻稿中的“安全港声明”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RLX":"雾芯科技"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104336218","content_text":"RLX Technology Inc., a leading branded e-vapor company in China, today announced its unaudited financial results for the first quarter endedMarch 31, 2021.First Quarter 2021 Financial HighlightsNet revenues were RMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million), representing an increase of 48.2% from RMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.Gross margin was 46.0%, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.GAAP netloss was RMB267.0 million(US$40.8 million), compared withRMB236.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.Non-GAAP net income[1]was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million), representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.RLX Technology stock surged 5% in premarket trading.\"2021 began, on a solid note, with strong growth in key performance metrics of our business,\" said Ms.Ying (Kate) Wang, Co-founder, Chairperson of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of RLX Technology. \"Specifically, our expansion in distribution network fueled a strong sequential growth, further demonstrating sustained user demand for our e-vapor product portfolio.\"\"As the go-to brand of e-vapor products inChina, we remain dedicated to investing in deepening our scientific research, improving our technology and product development, expanding our distribution network and retail outlets as well as enhancing supply chain and production capabilities. In the first quarter, we opened ourQuality Labto further strengthen our quality assurance and control capabilities, and started developing our second and third exclusive production plants to enhance our production capabilities. We believe we are well positioned to further capture the growth potential in the e-vapor industry inChina,\" Ms. Wang concluded.\"Our robust results in the first quarter of 2021 exemplify our strong capabilities in meeting user demands for reliable, innovative and trustworthy products,\" said Mr.Chao Lu, Chief Financial Officer. \"Building on rapid revenue growth and continued efforts in improving operating leverage, our gross margin and non-GAAP net margin have remained steady in the first quarter. We will continue to pursue user value creation by enhancing our suite of product offerings and strengthening our brand leadership in the market.\"First Quarter 2021 Unaudited Financial ResultsNet revenues increased by 48.2% toRMB2,398.5 million(US$366.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB1,618.5 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to an increase in net revenues from sales to offline distributors, which was mainly attributable to the expansion of the Company's distribution and retail network.Gross profit increased by 59.1% to RMB1,104.1 million (US$168.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB694.1 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.Gross margin increased to 46.0% in the first quarter of 2021, compared to 42.9% in the fourth quarter of 2020.Operating expenses wereRMB1,216.0 million(US$185.6 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 42.6% fromRMB852.6 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.Selling expensesincreased by 48.2% to RMB291.5 million (US$44.5 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB196.7 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was mainly driven by (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, (ii) an increase in branding material expenses, and (iii) an increase in shipping expenses.General and administrative expenses increased by 59.5% toRMB712.8 million(US$108.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB447.0 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to (i) an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, and (ii) an increase in share-based compensation expenses, partially offset by a decrease in legal and other consulting fees.Research and development expensesincreased by 1.3% to RMB211.6 million (US$32.3 million) in the first quarter of 2021 fromRMB208.9 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in salaries and welfare benefits, partially offset by (i) a decrease in share-based compensation expenses, and (ii) a decrease in material expenses.Share-based compensation expenses recognized in selling expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in total wereRMB877.5million (US$133.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021 andRMB656.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.Loss from operations was RMB111.9 million (US$17.1 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB158.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.Income tax expense wasRMB176.3 million (US$26.9 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB110.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily due to an increase in taxable income.GAAPnet loss was RMB267.0 million (US$40.8 million) in the first quarter of 2021, compared withRMB236.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.Non-GAAP net income was RMB610.5 million(US$93.2 million) in the first quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 45.6% fromRMB419.3 millionin the fourth quarter of 2020.GAAP basic and diluted net loss per American depositary share (\"ADS\") were bothRMB0.174(US$0.027)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.165in the fourth quarter of 2020.Non-GAAP basic and diluted netincome per ADS[2]were both RMB0.398(US$0.061)in the first quarter of 2021, compared toRMB0.292in the fourth quarter of 2020.Balance SheetAs ofMarch 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term bank deposits, short-term investments and long-term bank deposits ofRMB14,437.8 million (US$2,203.6 million), compared toRMB3,421.4 millionas ofDecember 31, 2020. The increase was primarily due to net proceeds raised in the Company's initial public offering inJanuary 2021. As of March 31, 2021, approximatelyUS$1,647.2 million(RMB10,792.2 million) was denominated in U.S. dollars.Business OutlookFor the second quarter of 2021, the Company currently expects net revenues to exceedRMB2,850 million, and expects non-GAAP net income to exceedRMB720 million. The Company's expected GAAP net income will include share-based compensation expenses which depend on the Company's share price and are not available without unreasonable efforts. The Company currently also expects gross margin to remain steady.The above outlook is based on the current market conditions, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and reflects the Company's preliminary estimates of market and operating conditions, and users' demand, which are all subject to change. Please refer to \"Safe Harbor Statement\" in this press release for risks associated with forward-looking statements.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"RLX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":119786957,"gmtCreate":1622565108579,"gmtModify":1634100402183,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/119786957","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":603,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":134593759,"gmtCreate":1622247058571,"gmtModify":1634182544443,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily","listText":"Daily","text":"Daily","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/134593759","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":913,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":134655961,"gmtCreate":1622228188453,"gmtModify":1634182651754,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily","listText":"Daily","text":"Daily","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/134655961","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":135031898,"gmtCreate":1622121556214,"gmtModify":1634183682993,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/135031898","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":921,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":138465843,"gmtCreate":1621954817182,"gmtModify":1634185161193,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task ","listText":"Daily task ","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/138465843","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":716,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":131436792,"gmtCreate":1621872196916,"gmtModify":1634185893770,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/131436792","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":731,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133434004,"gmtCreate":1621780832308,"gmtModify":1634186615416,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/133434004","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":698,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":130356996,"gmtCreate":1621515104215,"gmtModify":1634188521988,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/130356996","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1056,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":194127668,"gmtCreate":1621348896354,"gmtModify":1634192228245,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task ","listText":"Daily task ","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/194127668","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":737,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":358170899,"gmtCreate":1616676476311,"gmtModify":1634524616669,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Why market still drop?","listText":"Why market still drop?","text":"Why market still drop?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/358170899","repostId":"1171024907","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171024907","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1616675693,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1171024907?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-25 20:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Weekly jobless claims tumble to lowest level in more than a year<blockquote>每周申请失业救济人数跌至一年多来的最低水平</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171024907","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"First-time claims for unemployment insurance unexpectedly fell sharply last week amid signs that hir","content":"<p>First-time claims for unemployment insurance unexpectedly fell sharply last week amid signs that hiring has picked up in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称,由于有迹象表明美国经济招聘有所回升,上周首次申请失业保险的人数意外大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p> Claims totaled 684,000 for the week ended March 20, the first time the number has been below 700,000 since the Covid-19 pandemic began just over a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>截至3月20日当周,申请失业救济人数总计684,000人,这是自一年多前Covid-19大流行开始以来,这一数字首次低于70万人。</blockquote></p><p> Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been expecting claims to total 735,000 after an unexpected spike the week before.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯调查的经济学家此前预计申请失业救济人数将达到735,000人,此前一周意外激增。</blockquote></p><p> A separate release Thursday morning showed that gross domestic product was stronger than anticipated in the fourth quarter. The third and final reading on GDP showed a gain of 4.3%, up from previous estimates and the Wall Street consensus of 4.1%.</p><p><blockquote>周四上午发布的另一份报告显示,第四季度国内生产总值强于预期。GDP第三次也是最终数据显示增长4.3%,高于之前的预期和华尔街普遍预期的4.1%。</blockquote></p><p> Policymakers have been watching the jobs data more closely, though, for clues about where the economy is headed. Last week’s progress showed that the jobs market is gaining traction amid aggressive government stimulus and a vaccination program that is seeing close to 2.5 million Americans a day getting shots aimed at stopping the Covid-19 spread.</p><p><blockquote>不过,政策制定者一直在更密切地关注就业数据,以寻找有关经济走向的线索。上周的进展表明,在政府积极的刺激措施和疫苗接种计划的推动下,就业市场正在获得牵引力,每天有近250万美国人接种旨在阻止Covid-19传播的疫苗。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Weekly jobless claims tumble to lowest level in more than a year<blockquote>每周申请失业救济人数跌至一年多来的最低水平</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWeekly jobless claims tumble to lowest level in more than a year<blockquote>每周申请失业救济人数跌至一年多来的最低水平</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-03-25 20:34</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>First-time claims for unemployment insurance unexpectedly fell sharply last week amid signs that hiring has picked up in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Thursday.</p><p><blockquote>美国劳工部周四报告称,由于有迹象表明美国经济招聘有所回升,上周首次申请失业保险的人数意外大幅下降。</blockquote></p><p> Claims totaled 684,000 for the week ended March 20, the first time the number has been below 700,000 since the Covid-19 pandemic began just over a year ago.</p><p><blockquote>截至3月20日当周,申请失业救济人数总计684,000人,这是自一年多前Covid-19大流行开始以来,这一数字首次低于70万人。</blockquote></p><p> Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been expecting claims to total 735,000 after an unexpected spike the week before.</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯调查的经济学家此前预计申请失业救济人数将达到735,000人,此前一周意外激增。</blockquote></p><p> A separate release Thursday morning showed that gross domestic product was stronger than anticipated in the fourth quarter. The third and final reading on GDP showed a gain of 4.3%, up from previous estimates and the Wall Street consensus of 4.1%.</p><p><blockquote>周四上午发布的另一份报告显示,第四季度国内生产总值强于预期。GDP第三次也是最终数据显示增长4.3%,高于之前的预期和华尔街普遍预期的4.1%。</blockquote></p><p> Policymakers have been watching the jobs data more closely, though, for clues about where the economy is headed. Last week’s progress showed that the jobs market is gaining traction amid aggressive government stimulus and a vaccination program that is seeing close to 2.5 million Americans a day getting shots aimed at stopping the Covid-19 spread.</p><p><blockquote>不过,政策制定者一直在更密切地关注就业数据,以寻找有关经济走向的线索。上周的进展表明,在政府积极的刺激措施和疫苗接种计划的推动下,就业市场正在获得牵引力,每天有近250万美国人接种旨在阻止Covid-19传播的疫苗。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171024907","content_text":"First-time claims for unemployment insurance unexpectedly fell sharply last week amid signs that hiring has picked up in the U.S. economy, the Labor Department reported Thursday.\nClaims totaled 684,000 for the week ended March 20, the first time the number has been below 700,000 since the Covid-19 pandemic began just over a year ago.\nEconomists surveyed by Dow Jones had been expecting claims to total 735,000 after an unexpected spike the week before.\nA separate release Thursday morning showed that gross domestic product was stronger than anticipated in the fourth quarter. The third and final reading on GDP showed a gain of 4.3%, up from previous estimates and the Wall Street consensus of 4.1%.\nPolicymakers have been watching the jobs data more closely, though, for clues about where the economy is headed. Last week’s progress showed that the jobs market is gaining traction amid aggressive government stimulus and a vaccination program that is seeing close to 2.5 million Americans a day getting shots aimed at stopping the Covid-19 spread.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":618,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801641136,"gmtCreate":1627516402425,"gmtModify":1631891869626,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/801641136","repostId":"2155697398","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2114,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":382100064,"gmtCreate":1613375012158,"gmtModify":1634553816546,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/382100064","repostId":"2110904027","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":633,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360295761,"gmtCreate":1613919744953,"gmtModify":1634551857265,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360295761","repostId":"1143100356","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":294,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322613423,"gmtCreate":1615801438262,"gmtModify":1703493164334,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task ","listText":"Daily task ","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322613423","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":851,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322613919,"gmtCreate":1615801400431,"gmtModify":1703493163126,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy Nokia? ","listText":"Buy Nokia? ","text":"Buy Nokia?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/322613919","repostId":"1173461062","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":632,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329882114,"gmtCreate":1615220608938,"gmtModify":1703485954789,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Keep dipping ","listText":"Keep dipping ","text":"Keep dipping","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/329882114","repostId":"1199173220","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":450,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367288850,"gmtCreate":1614954415470,"gmtModify":1703483415117,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/367288850","repostId":"1182236638","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":366085528,"gmtCreate":1614360812164,"gmtModify":1703476981513,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"title":"Testing","htmlText":"Just test out of this function. Pls bear with me as I don't know what to write. Hope to learn a lot of thing from you all","listText":"Just test out of this function. Pls bear with me as I don't know what to write. Hope to learn a lot of thing from you all","text":"Just test out of this function. Pls bear with me as I don't know what to write. Hope to learn a lot of thing from you all","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/366085528","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":470,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328904920,"gmtCreate":1615477377960,"gmtModify":1703489748810,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task ","listText":"Daily task ","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/328904920","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":553,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321030272,"gmtCreate":1615384077096,"gmtModify":1703488200851,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hello for daily task","listText":"Hello for daily task","text":"Hello for daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/321030272","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368434945,"gmtCreate":1614346579487,"gmtModify":1703476684712,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for task","listText":"Thanks for task","text":"Thanks for task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/368434945","repostId":"1117820997","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":544,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360296930,"gmtCreate":1613919303720,"gmtModify":1634551859085,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360296930","repostId":"1179306002","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":421,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":360298497,"gmtCreate":1613919289219,"gmtModify":1634551859209,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/360298497","repostId":"1161529893","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161529893","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613733842,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161529893?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-19 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗?</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161529893","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by so","content":"<p> ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary. Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说,就像在拉斯维加斯一样,众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二,高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在,任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法,每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示,在跳上机器人投资列车之前,需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样,众议院通常会获胜,”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说,他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”,但他表示,公司通常会提出这样的报价,以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱,”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一,包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW,+1.03%,以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始,传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现,投资组合越大,客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合,年费中位数徘徊在1%左右,对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合,年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金,而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间,消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告,与去年第四季度相比,2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢?把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地,在后座系好安全带,你的司机(机器人顾问)就会到达那里。作为乘客,如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向,你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地,也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件,根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务,每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%,而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖,而不是完全自己投资,这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点,她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说,嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队,负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控,尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写:“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是,选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是,机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件,在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说,这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心,随着时间的推移,让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示,这使得你更容易承受市场波动,因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时,你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦,我需要摆脱困境’,”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关,因为他们知道你的时间范围,他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说,“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问,你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意,并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关,机器人投资就是其中之一,”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现,他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式,而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做,”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而,它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子,并想开始为他们的教育存钱,或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议?该平台是否提供建议?如果提供,复杂程度如何?”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议,提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外,纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示,机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如,投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱,而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说,传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资,为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的,这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是,虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式,特别是对于初学者来说,它可能会“使投资过于复杂”,马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下,并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合,我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问,”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资,该基金选择单一基金进行投资,并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年,MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合,投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说,结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示,机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗?</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs is joining the robo-investing party — should you?<blockquote>高盛正在加入机器人投资行列——你应该加入吗?</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Marketwatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-02-19 19:24</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p> ‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary. Robo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.</p><p><blockquote>加州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯说,就像在拉斯维加斯一样,众议院通常会获胜。他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。机器人投资在几乎每个经纪平台上都变得越来越普遍。直到周二,高盛GS(-0.91%)将其机器人咨询服务Marcus限制为至少有1000万美元可投资的人。</blockquote></p><p> Now anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.</p><p><blockquote>现在,任何拥有至少1,000美元可投资的人都可以使用高盛一些最富有的客户使用的相同交易算法,每年只需支付0.35%的咨询费。但投资专家表示,在跳上机器人投资列车之前,需要考虑更多成本。</blockquote></p><p> “Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.</p><p><blockquote>“就像在拉斯维加斯一样,众议院通常会获胜,”加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的财务顾问万斯·巴斯(Vance Barse)说,他经营着一家名为Your Dedicated Fiduciary的公司。</blockquote></p><p> Although the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.</p><p><blockquote>尽管35个基点的价格标签对高盛来说是一个“亏损领头羊”,但他表示,公司通常会提出这样的报价,以吸引客户向他们交叉销售银行产品。</blockquote></p><p> “People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“人们忘记了银行最终是为了赚钱,”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Goldman Sachs declined to comment.</p><p><blockquote>高盛拒绝置评。</blockquote></p><p> The company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.</p><p><blockquote>该公司是其他提供数字顾问的主要金融服务公司之一,包括Vanguard、Fidelity和Schwab SCHW,+1.03%,以及Betterment和Wealthfront等初创公司。</blockquote></p><p> Fees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问的费用从0.25%左右开始,传统经纪商的费用会增加到1%及以上。行业出版物Inside Information对近1,000名理财规划师进行的一项调查发现,投资组合越大,客户支付的费用比例就越低。</blockquote></p><p> The median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.</p><p><blockquote>对于100万美元或以下的投资组合,年费中位数徘徊在1%左右,对于价值500万至1000万美元的投资组合,年费中位数徘徊在0.5%左右。</blockquote></p><p> Robo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.</p><p><blockquote>高盛和Betterment提供的机器人顾问与Robinhood等机器人平台不同。前者建议投资组合专注于交易所交易基金,而Robinhood允许用户投资个人ETF、股票、期权甚至加密货币。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robo investing as a self-driving car</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人投资作为自动驾驶汽车</b></blockquote></p><p> Consumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>在疫情期间,消费者以前所未有的水平转向机器人投资。</blockquote></p><p> The rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.</p><p><blockquote>根据研究和咨询公司艾特集团5月份发布的一份报告,与去年第四季度相比,2020年第一季度的新开户率跃升了50%至300%。</blockquote></p><p> So what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.</p><p><blockquote>那么什么是rob投资呢?把它想象成一辆自动驾驶汽车。</blockquote></p><p> You put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.</p><p><blockquote>你输入你的目的地,在后座系好安全带,你的司机(机器人顾问)就会到达那里。作为乘客,如果你担心你的司机把你引向错误的方向,你就不能轻易刹车。如果您赶时间并想更快地到达目的地,也不能踩油门。</blockquote></p><p> Robo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资平台使用先进的交易算法软件,根据个人的风险偏好以及期望的短期和长期回报等因素来设计投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> There are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.</p><p><blockquote>有200多个平台提供这些服务,每年收取的咨询费通常不超过0.5%,而人力投资顾问收取的年费为1%。</blockquote></p><p> And rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.</p><p><blockquote>机器人顾问处理资产的买卖,而不是完全自己投资,这可能成为第二份工作并导致情绪化的投资决策。</blockquote></p><p> Cynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.</p><p><blockquote>嘉信理财数字咨询和创新副总裁辛西娅·洛(Cynthia Loh)不同意这种观点,她认为机器人投资并不意味着让技术控制你的资金。她说,嘉信理财拥有一支投资专家团队,负责监督投资策略并在市场波动期间进行监控,尽管有些服务比其他服务有更多的人工输入。</blockquote></p><p> As she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”</p><p><blockquote>正如她最近在MarketWatch上所写:“关于自动化投资的一个常见误解是,选择机器人顾问本质上意味着将资金的控制权交给机器人。事实是,机器人解决方案结合了自动化和人工组件,在幕后运行事物。”</blockquote></p><p> <b>Robos appeal to inexperienced investors</b></p><p><blockquote><b>机器人吸引缺乏经验的投资者</b></blockquote></p><p> Robo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.</p><p><blockquote>机器人投资往往吸引缺乏经验的投资者或没有时间或精力管理自己投资组合的投资者。巴尔斯说,这些投资者可以对“一劳永逸”的投资方法感到放心,随着时间的推移,让市场做自己的事情”。</blockquote></p><p> That makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.</p><p><blockquote>NerdWallet的投资和退休专家蒂芙尼·拉姆-贝尔福(Tiffany Lam-Balfour)表示,这使得你更容易承受市场波动,因为你不一定必须做出购买或出售资产的冲动决定。</blockquote></p><p> “When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”</p><p><blockquote>“当你投资时,你不会想一直关注市场并说‘哦,我需要摆脱困境’,”她说。“你想让专业人士来帮你度过难关,因为他们知道你的时间范围,他们会自动为你调整你的投资组合。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> That said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”</p><p><blockquote>也就是说,“你不能指望你的投资只会上涨。即使你有世界上最好的人类财务顾问,你也不能指望这一点。”</blockquote></p><p> Others disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.</p><p><blockquote>其他人不同意,并表示机器人顾问对老年投资者有吸引力。“退休后的规划和支付费用很复杂。有很多选择可以帮助投资者度过难关,机器人投资就是其中之一,”Loh说。</blockquote></p><p> “Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.</p><p><blockquote>“许多深思熟虑的长期投资者发现,他们想要一种更现代、更简化、更便宜的投资方式,而机器人投资正好符合这一要求。他们很乐意让技术来处理更困难、更耗时的日常活动。投资者自己做,”她补充道。</blockquote></p><p> <b>There is often no door to knock on</b></p><p><blockquote><b>常常无门可敲</b></blockquote></p><p> Your robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.</p><p><blockquote>你的机器人顾问只知道你告诉它什么。大多数机器人投资平台上要求您填写的简单问卷将收集有关您的年收入、期望退休年龄以及您愿意承担的风险水平的信息。</blockquote></p><p> It won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.</p><p><blockquote>然而,它不会知道你是否刚刚有了一个孩子,并想开始为他们的教育存钱,或者你是否最近失业了。</blockquote></p><p> “The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.</p><p><blockquote>“那么问题就变成了那个人向谁寻求建议?该平台是否提供建议?如果提供,复杂程度如何?”巴斯说。</blockquote></p><p> Not all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.</p><p><blockquote>并非所有平台都提供个性化投资建议,提供人工建议的混合模式往往会收取更高的年费。</blockquote></p><p> Additionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.</p><p><blockquote>此外,纽约市财务咨询集团Lifelaidout的注册财务规划师罗杰·马(Roger Ma)表示,机器人顾问不一定“在管理资金时首先考虑税收效率”。</blockquote></p><p> For instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.</p><p><blockquote>例如,投资者抵消长期投资税款的一种常见方式是出售已累计亏损的资产。《工作你的钱,而不是你的生活》一书的作者马说,传统顾问通常专注于构建能带来最节税结果的投资组合。</blockquote></p><p> But with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.</p><p><blockquote>但通过机器人投资,为您进行的交易与为许多其他投资者进行的交易是相同的,这些投资者可能属于与您不同的税级。</blockquote></p><p> On top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.</p><p><blockquote>最重要的是,虽然机器人投资可能感觉像是一种简单的投资方式,特别是对于初学者来说,它可能会“使投资过于复杂”,马云说。</blockquote></p><p> “If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.</p><p><blockquote>“如果你只是想尝试一下,并且想感觉自己投资于多元化的投资组合,我不会说绝对不要聘请机器人顾问,”他说。</blockquote></p><p> Don’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.</p><p><blockquote>他补充说,不要排除通过目标日期基金进行投资,该基金选择单一基金进行投资,并根据投资目标随着时间的推移调整头寸。</blockquote></p><p> But not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.</p><p><blockquote>但并不是每个人都能区分机器人的建议和人类的建议。2015年,MarketWatch请四位著名的机器人顾问和四位传统的有血有肉的机器人顾问为一位假设的35岁投资者构建投资组合,投资金额为40,000美元。</blockquote></p><p> The results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.</p><p><blockquote>对于机器人顾问的批评者来说,结果或许令人惊讶。Pinnacle Advisory Group的研究总监Michael Kitces在审查结果后表示,机器人的建议与人类顾问的建议“没有太大不同”。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源:<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page\">Marketwatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验,我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/goldman-sachs-is-joining-the-robo-investing-party-should-you-11613658128?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161529893","content_text":"‘Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\n\nRobo investing has become increasingly ubiquitous on practically every brokerage platform. Until Tuesday, Goldman Sachs GS, -0.91% restricted its robo-advisory service, Marcus, to people who had at least $10 million to invest.\nNow anyone with at least $1,000 to invest in can access the same trading algorithms that have been used by some of Goldman Sachs’ wealthiest clients for a 0.35% annual advisory fee. But investing experts say there are more costs to consider before jumping on the robo-investing train.\n“Much like in Vegas, the house generally wins,” said Vance Barse, a San Diego, California-based financial advisor who runs a company called Your Dedicated Fiduciary.\nAlthough the 35 basis-point price tag is a “loss leader” to Goldman Sachs, he said companies typically make such offers in order to attract clients to cross-sell them banking products.\n“People forget that banks are ultimately in the business of making money,” he said.\nGoldman Sachs declined to comment.\nThe company is among other major financial-services firms offering digital advisers, including Vanguard, Fidelity and Schwab SCHW, +1.03% and startups such as Betterment and Wealthfront.\nFees for robo advisers can start at around 0.25%, and increase to 1% and above for traditional brokers. A survey of nearly 1,000 financial planners by Inside Information, a trade publication, found that the bigger the portfolio, the lower the percentage clients paid in fees.\nThe median annual charge hovered at around 1% for portfolios of $1 million or less, and 0.5% for portfolios worth $5 million to $10 million.\nRobo advisers like those on offer from Goldman Sachs and Betterment differ from robo platforms like Robinhood. The former suggest portfolios focused on exchange-traded funds, while Robinhood allows users to invest in individual ETFs, stocks, options and even cryptocurrencies.\nRobo investing as a self-driving car\nConsumers have turned to robo-investing at unprecedented levels during the pandemic.\nThe rate of new accounts opened jumped between 50% and 300% during the first quarter of 2020 compared to the fourth quarter of last year, according to a May report published by research and advisory firm Aite Group.\nSo what is rob-investing? Think of it like a self-driving car.\nYou put in your destination, buckle up in the backseat and your driver (robo adviser) will get there. You, the passenger, can’t easily slam the breaks if you fear your driver is leading you in the wrong direction. Nor can you put your foot on the gas pedal if you’re in a rush and want to get to your destination faster.\nRobo-investing platforms use advanced-trading algorithm software to design investment portfolios based on factors such as an individual’s appetite for risk-taking and desired short-term and long-term returns.\nThere are over 200 platforms that provide these services charging typically no more than a 0.5% annual advisory fee, compared to the 1% annual fee human investment advisors charge.\nAnd rather than investing entirely on your own, which can become a second job and lead to emotional investment decisions, robo advisers handle buying and selling assets.\nCynthia Loh, Schwab vice president of Digital Advice and Innovation, disagrees, and argues that robo investing doesn’t mean giving technology control of your money. Schwab, she said, has a team of investment experts who oversee investment strategy and keep watch during periods of market volatility, although some services have more input from humans than others.\nAs she recently wrote on MarketWatch: “One common misconception about automated investing is that choosing a robo adviser essentially means handing control of your money over to robots. The truth is that robo solutions have a combination of automated and human components running things behind the scenes.”\nRobos appeal to inexperienced investors\nRobo investing tends to appeal to inexperienced investors or ones who don’t have the time or energy to manage their own portfolios. These investors can take comfort in the “set it and forget it approach to investing and overtime let the markets do their thing,” Barse said.\nThat makes it much easier to stomach market volatility knowing that you don’t necessarily have to make spur-of-the-moment decisions to buy or sell assets, said Tiffany Lam-Balfour, an investing and retirement specialist at NerdWallet.\n“When you’re investing, you don’t want to keep looking at the market and going ‘Oh I need to get out of this,’” she said. “You want to leave it to the professionals to get you through it because they know what your time horizon is, and they’ll adjust your portfolio automatically for you.”\nThat said, “you can’t just expect your investments will only go up. Even if you had the world’s best human financial adviser you can’t expect that.”\nOthers disagree, and say robo advisers appeal to older investors. “Planning for and paying yourself in retirement is complex. There are many options out there to help investors through it, and robo investing is one of them,” Loh said.\n“Many thoughtful, long-term investors have discovered that they want a more modern, streamlined, and inexpensive way to invest, and robo investing fits the bill. They are happy to let technology handle the mundane activities that are harder and more time-consuming for investors to do themselves,” she added.\nThere is often no door to knock on\nYour robo adviser only knows what you tell it. The simplistic questionnaire you’re required to fill out will on most robo-investing platforms will collect information on your annual income, desired age to retire and the level of risk you’re willing to take on.\nIt won’t however know if you just had a child and would like to begin saving for their education down the road or if you recently lost your job.\n“The question then becomes to whom does that person go to for advice and does that platform offer that and if so, to what level of complexity?” said Barse.\nNot all platforms give individualized investment advice and the hybrid models that do offer advice from a human tend to charge higher annual fees.\nAdditionally, a robo adviser won’t necessarily “manage your money with tax efficiency at front of mind,” said Roger Ma, a certified financial planner at Lifelaidout, a New York City-based financial advisory group.\nFor instance, one common way investors offset the taxes they pay on long-term investments is by selling assets that have accrued losses. Traditional advisers often specialize in constructing portfolios that lead to the most tax-efficient outcomes, said Ma, who is the author of “Work Your Money, Not Your Life”.\nBut with robo investing, the trades that are made for you are the same ones that are being made for a slew of other investors who may fall under a different tax-bracket than you.\nOn top of that, while robo investing may feel like a simplistic way to get into investing, especially for beginners it can “overcomplicate investing,” Ma said.\n“If you are just looking to dip your toe in and you want to feel like you’re invested in a diversified portfolio, I wouldn’t say definitely don’t do a robo adviser,” he said.\nDon’t rule out investing through a target-date fund that selects a single fund to invest in and adjusts the position over time based on their investment goals, he added.\nBut not everyone can tell the difference between robo advice and advice from a human being. In 2015, MarketWatch asked four prominent robo advisers and four of the traditional, flesh-and-blood variety to construct portfolios for a hypothetical 35-year-old investor with $40,000 to invest.\nThe results were, perhaps, surprising for critics of robo advisers. The robots’ suggestions were “not massively different” from what the human advisers proposed, said Michael Kitces, Pinnacle Advisory Group’s research director, after reviewing the results.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384218684,"gmtCreate":1613655677148,"gmtModify":1634552766295,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/384218684","repostId":"1102078157","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":393,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":385543944,"gmtCreate":1613567530988,"gmtModify":1634553128684,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Got to buy abit","listText":"Got to buy abit","text":"Got to buy abit","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/385543944","repostId":"1109567373","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":571,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":385555098,"gmtCreate":1613567087514,"gmtModify":1634553130625,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hello all!","listText":"Hello all!","text":"Hello all!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/385555098","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":322,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":373259053,"gmtCreate":1618853838472,"gmtModify":1634290368075,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/373259053","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":723,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325200326,"gmtCreate":1615899504565,"gmtModify":1703494683007,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Daily task","listText":"Daily task","text":"Daily task","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/325200326","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":404,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":323089508,"gmtCreate":1615288965204,"gmtModify":1703486809191,"author":{"id":"3555405988657722","authorId":"3555405988657722","name":"XxBoxX","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10dca596007b042e10a18625e67b7893","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555405988657722","idStr":"3555405988657722"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes! Fly ","listText":"Yes! Fly ","text":"Yes! Fly","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/323089508","repostId":"1172767345","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":434,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}