吴家琦
吴家琦认证个人
老虎认证: 伦敦商学院斯隆研究员
IP属地:海外
2关注
315粉丝
0主题
0勋章
avatar吴家琦
2022-06-18
Stocks likely have further to sell-off but when should you look to buy-the-dip?🚨Despite the S&P 500 being down 23% YTD - stocks are far from cheap according to one indicator (never just use one indicator).The Shiller CAPE Ratio which measures the P/E, has declined by ~20% in the last 6 months falling from: 39x at the 2021 peak —> 29x today.However, if you look historically, this is far from cheap. The dot-com bubble peak for example, stocks traded at a 44x, eventually falling to 21x in 2003 after the crash. Again not massively cheap. At current levels, we should be trading at roughly 10x if you look at the chart below. This would mean a drawdown of 50% if core inflation stubbornly stayed at this level of 5.4% - not my view.On the flip side if you *didn’t* invest from 2018 - 2022 bec
avatar吴家琦
2022-06-19
BREAKING: Auto-loan DEFAULTS are increasing - warning for the global economy 🚨The CFO of one of the world’s largest car manufacturers Ford Motor Company has just made a short comment with BIG implications.Why is this important?Auto loans are already the third largest consumer credit market in the United States at over ~$1.4 trillion outstanding, double the amount from 10 years ago.This is particularly bad news for auto manufacturers with high amounts of auto-loans outstanding.Let’s walk this particular example through: Recessionary Consumer Confidence + Record Fuel Prices + 40-year high Inflation —> Auto-loan delinquencies —> Lower Auto-demand —> Lower Manufacturing Output —> Corporate Lay-offs —> Higher Unemployment —> Lower Economic Activity —> RecessionThis could be
avatar吴家琦
2022-07-13

全球通货膨胀的恶魔之手

声明 |本文为斯隆研究员个人学习笔记,不构成投资建议,与任何组织均无关。想着要对今年的经济和资本市场做一个半年总结,总是有点萧杀秋风扫落叶的感觉。股市、政府债券和数字货币尽皆下跌。今年的特殊通胀环境里,从全球看,传统的“股票/债券”配置也几乎完全失效,业界在感叹和讨论股债双杀。2022年代通胀的恶魔之手,不知不觉中伸向了经济与资本市场的角角落落。它带来了与1970年代有着本质不同的加息风险,当然也预示着其他替代加息的方案。它的背后是正在加深的能源危机。它挥一挥衣袖,世界的裂痕暗流涌动。为了与之抗衡,欧洲使出了不少解数。而依然高估值的美元,暂时能强势笑对通胀和经济衰退。加息风险要理解通过货币政策管理本轮通胀和经济衰退之难,就必须了解现今的经济环境,与1970年代有何不同。1970年代,央行们通过承诺和实施加息,来管理通胀的预期和通胀率。在那个央行独立性得以充分确保的时代,货币政策制定者们对平衡通胀所需要付出的代价——比如,最终将对总产出和就业的影响,相对没有什么顾虑。是的,1970年代,发达国家央行们带头控制了通胀,但在大温和大稳健时期的另一面,全球经济也为此付出了巨大的代价。最突出的例子就是,1980年代在拉丁美洲产生的债务危机,给世界带来了持续20年的负面影响。更重要的是,虽然都处于能源危机的背景,1970年代的油价暴涨除了起源于与今天类似的战争和供应不足,主要也有石油公司和消费者持续的拼命抢购和疯狂的囤积行为的贡献。反观现今的通货膨胀,包括油价上涨的主导因素在内,都更多地与供应不足有关——对于当今全球经济的症结和所处的趋势,学界和业界有着长时间的争论,最终在供应问题是根本原因,并很可能因此产生衰退和经济危机等问题上达成了一致。包括世界银行的最新全球经济展望报告,以及至今有表达过观点的诺奖经济学家们,在这方面都达成了共识。在我的分析笔记《扭转全球通货膨胀》中,载
全球通货膨胀的恶魔之手
avatar吴家琦
2022-08-03
While this does reflect a challenging macro-market backdrop, the upside of this is that when you see a crash in IPO activity it often means a bottom is near (albeit note the almost 2-year long IPO winter in 08/09!).It does reflect market sentiment, but at the margin it also reflects supply: at the end of the day it’s all supply & demand. If the supply of new IPOs goes down then at the margin that helps the overall stockmarket supply vs demand balance.All of this is not a new phenomenon — the chart below provides some longer-term perspective. The cycle of market booms and busts can be clearly traced by the ebb and flow of IPO activity.
avatar吴家琦
2022-09-05

​最大的利空:从经济滞胀到全面衰退

博客 | 吴家琦 (Jiaqi Wu),斯隆学者 (Sloan Fellow),师从于 A. Michael Spence 和 Robert W. Jenkins。A. Michael Spence 执教全球经济与新兴市场经济学以来的经济学论文最高分得主;意大利SDA博科尼商学院经济学全系第一。伦敦商学院 Andrew J Scott 最佳斯隆经济学论文;伦敦商学院斯隆经济学全系第一;伦敦商学院资产管理课程全校第一。 声明 | 本文为斯隆研究员个人学习笔记,不构成投资建议,与任何组织均无关。 相关文章 | 我在全球通货膨胀的恶魔之手聊了全球经济与资本市场的风险,预言了美元的疯狂走强。更早之前,我也在扭转全球通货膨胀分解了通货膨胀的根本症结不仅是利率问题,更是全球供应链问题。这些分析均可相互支持和引证,环环相扣。你如果对世界金融市场的根本机理感兴趣,欢迎阅读。 * 美元处于20年来的最高水平。新兴市场股票的表现将在很大程度上取决于美元指数在未来几个月的表现。如果美元指数继续走强,那么新兴市场将陷入困境。 也许,对于20世纪70年代和80年代的滞胀*来说,令人宽慰的是,它毕竟是短暂的,只有一年左右。然而我们不能如鸵鸟般直接把头埋在土里一年,去不负责任地忽略滞胀将带来的可怕后果。因为从另一方面来说,滞胀最令市场恐惧的事情是,随着全球央行们完成约束性政策转向,世界经济很快就会进入全面衰退*。 现今,全球的主要经济体正在以不同的速度重蹈历史的覆辙,处于从2022年短暂的“经济滞胀”向2023年起持续时间和运行深度均难以预测的“全面衰退”过渡。这样的过度一般需要几个月时间,直至美联储政策最终达到约束性状态(3.5%),以及欧洲央行的中性被落地。届时,由于经济衰退的正式到来,预计
​最大的利空:从经济滞胀到全面衰退
avatar吴家琦
2022-07-26

The Fed’s next step, and the growthsacrifice required

When the Fed hikes 75bp this week, it will take policy rates to a neutral-ish 2.25-2.5%. Thus moves at subsequent meetings will deliver a restrictive setting, and then either the Fed’s hoped-for softlanding or the mildrecession that seems to have become the analyst/investor consens. I say that mild recession has become consensus for two reasons: (1) this term dominates alternatives like “severe”, “long” or “deep” in sell-side research and market commentary; and (2) market valuations like Equity PEs and Credit spreads were, at their worst points this summer, only consistent with minimal economic contractions. This modal view of mild recession often comes from recognition that US household & corporate balancesheets look strong compared to typical, pre-recession deterioration. For ex
The Fed’s next step, and the growthsacrifice required

去老虎APP查看更多动态