Iamthomasss的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Iamthomasss

Iamthomasss

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

17关注

2粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-08-04

Great news

Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote>

2021-08-04

Good insights

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-31

Following for more

Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>

2021-07-31

Great

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-30

Good

Amazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote>

2021-07-30

Going to keep an eye on this

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-30

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-30

Good

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4088245287047370","uuid":"4088245287047370","gmtCreate":1625142424017,"gmtModify":1627655852281,"name":"Iamthomasss","pinyin":"iamthomasss","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":17,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.12.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-1","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"精英交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到30次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.67%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":890186706,"gmtCreate":1628086951405,"gmtModify":1633753715149,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great news","listText":"Great news","text":"Great news","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890186706","repostId":"1146704714","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146704714","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628083681,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146704714?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 21:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146704714","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data\nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. ","content":"<p><ul>  <li>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data</li>  <li>Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</li>  <li>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.</li> </ul> (Aug 4)&nbsp;U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</li><li>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</li><li>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</li></ul>（8月4日）美国。在一家主要汽车制造商的盈利和私营部门就业报告低于预期后，周三上午股市下跌。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&amp;P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&amp;P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌约147点，即0.4%。标普500下跌0.3%，而纳斯达克综合指数持平。此前，标普500周二打破了连续两天的下跌，创下创纪录的收盘价，使其2021年的涨幅超过17%。</blockquote></p><p> Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</p><p><blockquote>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f07059e6f35af7ae40b84ff4fccdc425\" tg-width=\"364\" tg-height=\"369\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Airline stocks fell</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>航空股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1616caf96bbfd7781bd83ec905dadfb4\" tg-width=\"359\" tg-height=\"652\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Bank stocks are down</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>银行股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/342fe79f0fe76a05734e9a553bf3d22e\" tg-width=\"365\" tg-height=\"715\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chinese Stocks rally</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>中国股市上涨</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Novavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲批准新冠疫苗合同后，Novavax股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da91666091c7ee912199acb975944a2\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.&nbsp;</b>Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.</p><p><blockquote><b>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</b>通用汽车第二季度盈利未达预期，该公司股价早盘下跌约6%，令大盘承压。该汽车制造商确实提高了今年剩余时间关键利润指标的指引。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a83eef22ad4c7b4513849130b478e6b7\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-04 21:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data</li>  <li>Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</li>  <li>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.</li> </ul> (Aug 4)&nbsp;U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</li><li>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</li><li>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</li></ul>（8月4日）美国。在一家主要汽车制造商的盈利和私营部门就业报告低于预期后，周三上午股市下跌。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&amp;P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&amp;P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌约147点，即0.4%。标普500下跌0.3%，而纳斯达克综合指数持平。此前，标普500周二打破了连续两天的下跌，创下创纪录的收盘价，使其2021年的涨幅超过17%。</blockquote></p><p> Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</p><p><blockquote>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f07059e6f35af7ae40b84ff4fccdc425\" tg-width=\"364\" tg-height=\"369\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Airline stocks fell</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>航空股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1616caf96bbfd7781bd83ec905dadfb4\" tg-width=\"359\" tg-height=\"652\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Bank stocks are down</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>银行股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/342fe79f0fe76a05734e9a553bf3d22e\" tg-width=\"365\" tg-height=\"715\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chinese Stocks rally</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>中国股市上涨</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Novavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲批准新冠疫苗合同后，Novavax股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da91666091c7ee912199acb975944a2\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.&nbsp;</b>Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.</p><p><blockquote><b>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</b>通用汽车第二季度盈利未达预期，该公司股价早盘下跌约6%，令大盘承压。该汽车制造商确实提高了今年剩余时间关键利润指标的指引。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a83eef22ad4c7b4513849130b478e6b7\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146704714","content_text":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data\nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. Chinese Stocks rally.\nGM fell over 6% as earnings disappoint.\n\n(Aug 4) U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%. \nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. Chinese Stocks rally.\nAirline stocks fell\nBank stocks are down\nChinese Stocks rally\nNovavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.\n\nGM fell over 6% as earnings disappoint. Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890181542,"gmtCreate":1628086866986,"gmtModify":1633753716694,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good insights","listText":"Good insights","text":"Good insights","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890181542","repostId":"2156101387","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806742540,"gmtCreate":1627696569080,"gmtModify":1633757048905,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Following for more","listText":"Following for more","text":"Following for more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806742540","repostId":"1152039134","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152039134","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689014,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1152039134?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152039134","media":"The Street","summary":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor","content":"<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOOD":"Robinhood"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152039134","content_text":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.\nI can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.\nSecond, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?\nThird, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.\nI lost on every single point.\nThe underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.\nSecond, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.\nThird, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.\nEveryone who bought that day lost money.\nEveryone who sold that day made money.\nNo subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.\nIt is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.\nI always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.\nWhy do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.\nSo, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.\nGreed?\nStupidity?\nHow about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.\nJust like the offering ofTheStreet.com.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HOOD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806748055,"gmtCreate":1627696488377,"gmtModify":1633757051471,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806748055","repostId":"1106964638","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806299949,"gmtCreate":1627656199881,"gmtModify":1633757356168,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806299949","repostId":"1154453753","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154453753","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627649588,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154453753?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-30 20:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154453753","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. ","content":"<p>Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.</p><p><blockquote>电子商务巨头亚马逊的股价在超出华尔街盈利预期后正在下跌。如果你以前听说过，请阻止我们。亚马逊股价的典型结果是下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Yes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.</p><p><blockquote>是的，投资者总是有理由感到紧张，而这一次的原因不是收益本身。亚马逊（股票代码：AMZN）报告未经调整的每股收益为15.12美元。华尔街的目标是每股12.28美元。相反，该公司预测下一季度在线销售将放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.</p><p><blockquote>该股在盘前交易中下跌6.7%。亚马逊可能是标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别下跌0.6%和0.3%的原因。亚马逊吸走了市场的风。</blockquote></p><p> If shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价周五收盘下跌（看起来很有可能会下跌），这将是过去12个季度中第九次盈利超出预期，也是第六次在超出预期后下跌。换句话说，无论盈利有多好，亚马逊股价都有67%的可能性下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Investors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.</p><p><blockquote>然而，关注第三季度的投资者可能没有抓住要点。投资者应该记住的是，在本系列开始时（2018年第三季度），亚马逊股票的交易价格约为每股1,782美元。周四收盘价接近每股3,600美元。这相当于年平均回报率约为29%。还不错。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take&nbsp;Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s&nbsp;quarter shows&nbsp;strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告是有趣的事情。他们往往会证实投资者已经知道的事情。以卡特彼勒（CAT）为例。卡特彼勒和亚马逊几乎没有共同之处，只是它们都在周四收盘和周五开盘之间发布了报告。随着经济复苏和大宗商品成本上涨的压力，卡特彼勒的季度需求强劲。并不令人震惊。是的，它的股价下跌了2.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告很少改变投资论点。是的，有时真正的重磅炸弹会落下。对于亚马逊来说，疫情带来的在线销售放缓不太可能像周五令人震惊的交易所表明的那样。</blockquote></p><p> That’s our hunch.</p><p><blockquote>这是我们的预感。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-30 20:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.</p><p><blockquote>电子商务巨头亚马逊的股价在超出华尔街盈利预期后正在下跌。如果你以前听说过，请阻止我们。亚马逊股价的典型结果是下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Yes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.</p><p><blockquote>是的，投资者总是有理由感到紧张，而这一次的原因不是收益本身。亚马逊（股票代码：AMZN）报告未经调整的每股收益为15.12美元。华尔街的目标是每股12.28美元。相反，该公司预测下一季度在线销售将放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.</p><p><blockquote>该股在盘前交易中下跌6.7%。亚马逊可能是标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别下跌0.6%和0.3%的原因。亚马逊吸走了市场的风。</blockquote></p><p> If shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价周五收盘下跌（看起来很有可能会下跌），这将是过去12个季度中第九次盈利超出预期，也是第六次在超出预期后下跌。换句话说，无论盈利有多好，亚马逊股价都有67%的可能性下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Investors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.</p><p><blockquote>然而，关注第三季度的投资者可能没有抓住要点。投资者应该记住的是，在本系列开始时（2018年第三季度），亚马逊股票的交易价格约为每股1,782美元。周四收盘价接近每股3,600美元。这相当于年平均回报率约为29%。还不错。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take&nbsp;Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s&nbsp;quarter shows&nbsp;strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告是有趣的事情。他们往往会证实投资者已经知道的事情。以卡特彼勒（CAT）为例。卡特彼勒和亚马逊几乎没有共同之处，只是它们都在周四收盘和周五开盘之间发布了报告。随着经济复苏和大宗商品成本上涨的压力，卡特彼勒的季度需求强劲。并不令人震惊。是的，它的股价下跌了2.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告很少改变投资论点。是的，有时真正的重磅炸弹会落下。对于亚马逊来说，疫情带来的在线销售放缓不太可能像周五令人震惊的交易所表明的那样。</blockquote></p><p> That’s our hunch.</p><p><blockquote>这是我们的预感。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-stock-earnings-beat-drop-51627648377?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-stock-earnings-beat-drop-51627648377?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154453753","content_text":"Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.\nYes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.\nThe stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.\nIf shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.\nInvestors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.\nQuarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s quarter shows strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.\nQuarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.\nThat’s our hunch.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":994,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806678591,"gmtCreate":1627655593513,"gmtModify":1633757367980,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Going to keep an eye on this","listText":"Going to keep an eye on this","text":"Going to keep an eye on this","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806678591","repostId":"1109167679","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2048,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806671529,"gmtCreate":1627655550361,"gmtModify":1633757368546,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806671529","repostId":"1110111987","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1654,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806647053,"gmtCreate":1627655356472,"gmtModify":1633757371516,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806647053","repostId":"1198853414","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2070,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":806742540,"gmtCreate":1627696569080,"gmtModify":1633757048905,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Following for more","listText":"Following for more","text":"Following for more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806742540","repostId":"1152039134","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152039134","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627689014,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1152039134?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-31 07:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152039134","media":"The Street","summary":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Repor","content":"<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJim Cramer: Robinhood's IPO Debacle Shows How Little Has Changed Over the Decades<blockquote>吉姆·克莱默：Robinhood的IPO惨败表明几十年来变化很小</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">The Street</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-31 07:50</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>  Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.  What should Robinhood&nbsp;(<b>HOOD</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;have done to avoid the IPO debacle?</p><p><blockquote>听一个知道的人说，这个过程真的有缺陷。罗宾汉应该做什么（<b>发动机罩</b>)-获取报告为避免IPO失败做了哪些工作？</blockquote></p><p> I can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.</p><p><blockquote>我不能说周四发生了什么，谁是负责人，谁为什么辩护。</blockquote></p><p> I can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.</p><p><blockquote>我只能告诉你22年前TheStreet.com上市时我争论了什么。首先，作为创始人，我决心用股票奖励所有订阅者，以表明我对他们的忠诚。</blockquote></p><p> Second, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?</p><p><blockquote>其次，我坚持认为这笔交易的定价要比承销商想要的低得多。我们已经为初始投资者赚了一大笔钱。为什么不把很多留在桌面上，让新投资者做好呢？</blockquote></p><p> Third, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.</p><p><blockquote>第三，我希望有足够多的股票交给好人，这样就不会有脚蹼，我希望与各种经纪人密切协调，这些经纪人往往会渗透到流程中，通过批量市场订单、开仓过高然后做空股票来劫持开盘。一路下跌。</blockquote></p><p> I lost on every single point.</p><p><blockquote>我在每一点上都输了。</blockquote></p><p> The underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.</p><p><blockquote>承销商说我们不能分配给认购者。</blockquote></p><p> Second, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.</p><p><blockquote>第二，交易的价格不会被控制在我们可以有一个小的流行，这样每个人都会赢。</blockquote></p><p> Third, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.</p><p><blockquote>第三，场外订单，即那些下市价订单的人，是由一家名为Knight Securities的机构分批的，而不是承销商高盛，开盘价是62美元——甚至不清楚开盘价是多少，太混乱了——交易到66美元，就像Robinhood交易到39美元然后改变，然后再也没有交易更高。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who bought that day lost money.</p><p><blockquote>那天买的都亏了。</blockquote></p><p> Everyone who sold that day made money.</p><p><blockquote>那天卖出的每个人都赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> No subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.</p><p><blockquote>据我所知，没有订户进来，大多数是在开盘时买的，我疏远了除了大狗之外的所有人。</blockquote></p><p> It is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.</p><p><blockquote>令人惊讶的是，我们现在是2021年，这个过程虽然让客户进入，但却未能定价，因此Robinhood将钱留在了桌面上。相信我，这是可能的。但承销商和管理层选择不这样做。我们不知道哪一方搞砸了，或者两者都搞砸了，但有一个成功的蓝图；相信我，如果我知道1999年是什么，他们也知道现在是什么。</blockquote></p><p> I always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.</p><p><blockquote>我一直对发生的事感到后悔。大多数人责怪我，因为我是这个过程的代言人。我被它的可怕程度震惊了，没有“从长计议”，因为从长计议很糟糕。</blockquote></p><p> Why do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.</p><p><blockquote>为什么这些事情会出错？我确实责怪承销商，因为他们每天都这样做，而委托人只做一次。他们必须阻止管理层背叛股东，因为股东认为这是管理层的错。没有承销商会说他们搞砸了。那是不可能的。</blockquote></p><p> So, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.</p><p><blockquote>因此，我们坐下来，惊叹于这笔交易进行得有多糟糕，尽管它完全在承销商和委托人的范围内，所以罗宾汉留下了更多。</blockquote></p><p> Greed?</p><p><blockquote>贪婪？</blockquote></p><p> Stupidity?</p><p><blockquote>愚蠢？</blockquote></p><p> How about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.</p><p><blockquote>糟糕的执行和缺乏透明度表明事情处理得有多糟糕怎么样？</blockquote></p><p> Just like the offering ofTheStreet.com.</p><p><blockquote>就像TheStreet.com的产品一样。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21\">The Street</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HOOD":"Robinhood"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/cramer-robinhood-ipo-debacle-thestreet-7-30-21","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152039134","content_text":"Take it from a guy who knows, the process is really flawed.\n\nWhat should Robinhood (HOOD) -Get Report have done to avoid the IPO debacle?\nI can't speak to what happened on Thursday, who was in charge, who argued for what.\nI can only tell you what I argued for 22 years ago whenTheStreet.comwas coming public. First, as the founder, I was determined to award all the subscribers with stock to demonstrate my loyalty to them.\nSecond, I was insistent that the deal be priced much lower than the underwriters wanted. We had already made a ton of money for initial investors. Why not leave a lot on the table and let the new investors do well?\nThird, I wanted enough stock placed with good hands that there would be no flippers and I wanted close coordination with the various brokers who tended to infiltrate the process and hijack the openings by batching market orders and opening the stocks way too high and then shorting them all the way down.\nI lost on every single point.\nThe underwriters said we could not allocate to subscribers.\nSecond, the price of the deal would not be controlled to where we could have a small pop so everyone would win.\nThird, the over-the-transom orders, those who placed market orders, were batched by an outfit called Knight Securities, not the underwriter, Goldman Sachs, and it opened at $62 -- it wasn't even clear what the opening price was it was so chaotic -- traded to $66, like how Robinhood traded to $39 and change, and then never traded higher.\nEveryone who bought that day lost money.\nEveryone who sold that day made money.\nNo subscribers got in, most bought at the opening, from what I can tell, and I alienated everyone except the big dogs.\nIt is amazing that here we are in 2021 and the process, while letting clients in, failed to price it so that Robinhood left money on the table. Believe me, it was possible to do so. But the underwriters and the management chose not to do so. We don't know which side screwed up, or both, but there was a successful blueprint; believe me, if I knew what it was in 1999, they knew what it is now.\nI always regretted what happened. Most people blamed me as I was the face of the process. I was astounded by how horrendous it was and did not \"take the long view\" because the long view sucked.\nWhy do these things go wrong? I do blame the underwriter because they do this every day and the principals only do it once. They have to keep the management from betraying the shareholders because the shareholders think that it is management's fault. No underwriter is EVER going to say that they screwed up. That's not in the cards.\nSo, we sit back and we marvel about how badly the deal went even as it was well within the province of the underwriter and the principals to make it so Robinhood left more on the table.\nGreed?\nStupidity?\nHow about poor execution and a lack of transparency that shows how badly it was handled.\nJust like the offering ofTheStreet.com.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HOOD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806748055,"gmtCreate":1627696488377,"gmtModify":1633757051471,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806748055","repostId":"1106964638","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890186706,"gmtCreate":1628086951405,"gmtModify":1633753715149,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great news","listText":"Great news","text":"Great news","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890186706","repostId":"1146704714","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146704714","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628083681,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1146704714?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-04 21:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146704714","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data\nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. ","content":"<p><ul>  <li>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data</li>  <li>Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</li>  <li>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.</li> </ul> (Aug 4)&nbsp;U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</li><li>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</li><li>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</li></ul>（8月4日）美国。在一家主要汽车制造商的盈利和私营部门就业报告低于预期后，周三上午股市下跌。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&amp;P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&amp;P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌约147点，即0.4%。标普500下跌0.3%，而纳斯达克综合指数持平。此前，标普500周二打破了连续两天的下跌，创下创纪录的收盘价，使其2021年的涨幅超过17%。</blockquote></p><p> Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</p><p><blockquote>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f07059e6f35af7ae40b84ff4fccdc425\" tg-width=\"364\" tg-height=\"369\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Airline stocks fell</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>航空股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1616caf96bbfd7781bd83ec905dadfb4\" tg-width=\"359\" tg-height=\"652\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Bank stocks are down</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>银行股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/342fe79f0fe76a05734e9a553bf3d22e\" tg-width=\"365\" tg-height=\"715\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chinese Stocks rally</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>中国股市上涨</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Novavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲批准新冠疫苗合同后，Novavax股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da91666091c7ee912199acb975944a2\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.&nbsp;</b>Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.</p><p><blockquote><b>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</b>通用汽车第二季度盈利未达预期，该公司股价早盘下跌约6%，令大盘承压。该汽车制造商确实提高了今年剩余时间关键利润指标的指引。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a83eef22ad4c7b4513849130b478e6b7\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data<blockquote>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-04 21:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li>Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data</li>  <li>Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</li>  <li>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.</li> </ul> (Aug 4)&nbsp;U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.</p><p><blockquote><ul><li>ADP私营部门就业数据公布后，股市小幅低开</li><li>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</li><li>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</li></ul>（8月4日）美国。在一家主要汽车制造商的盈利和私营部门就业报告低于预期后，周三上午股市下跌。</blockquote></p><p> The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&amp;P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&amp;P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%.&nbsp;</p><p><blockquote>道琼斯工业平均指数下跌约147点，即0.4%。标普500下跌0.3%，而纳斯达克综合指数持平。此前，标普500周二打破了连续两天的下跌，创下创纪录的收盘价，使其2021年的涨幅超过17%。</blockquote></p><p> Airline&nbsp;stocks,&nbsp;bank&nbsp;stocks&nbsp;fell.&nbsp;Chinese Stocks&nbsp;rally.</p><p><blockquote>航空股、银行股下跌。中国股市上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f07059e6f35af7ae40b84ff4fccdc425\" tg-width=\"364\" tg-height=\"369\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Airline stocks fell</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>航空股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1616caf96bbfd7781bd83ec905dadfb4\" tg-width=\"359\" tg-height=\"652\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Bank stocks are down</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>银行股下跌</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/342fe79f0fe76a05734e9a553bf3d22e\" tg-width=\"365\" tg-height=\"715\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chinese Stocks rally</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>中国股市上涨</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Novavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.</p><p><blockquote>欧洲批准新冠疫苗合同后，Novavax股价上涨。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3da91666091c7ee912199acb975944a2\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>GM fell&nbsp;over&nbsp;6%&nbsp;as&nbsp;earnings disappoint.&nbsp;</b>Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.</p><p><blockquote><b>由于盈利令人失望，通用汽车股价下跌超过6%。</b>通用汽车第二季度盈利未达预期，该公司股价早盘下跌约6%，令大盘承压。该汽车制造商确实提高了今年剩余时间关键利润指标的指引。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a83eef22ad4c7b4513849130b478e6b7\" tg-width=\"837\" tg-height=\"558\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146704714","content_text":"Stocks open slightly lower after ADP private-sector payrolls data\nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. Chinese Stocks rally.\nGM fell over 6% as earnings disappoint.\n\n(Aug 4) U.S. stocks fell on Wednesday morning after the earnings of a major automaker and a private sector jobs report came in lower than expected.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average shed about 147 points, or 0.4%. The S&P 500 slipped by 0.3% while the Nasdaq Composite was flat. The dip comes after the S&P 500 broke a 2-day losing streak on Tuesday to post a record close, bringing its 2021 gains to more than 17%. \nAirline stocks, bank stocks fell. Chinese Stocks rally.\nAirline stocks fell\nBank stocks are down\nChinese Stocks rally\nNovavax Stock Jumps After Europe Approves Contract for Covid Vaccine.\n\nGM fell over 6% as earnings disappoint. Shares of General Motors fell about 6% in early trading, weighing on the broader market, after the automakermissed earnings expectations for the second quarter. The automaker did raise its guidance for a key profit metric for the rest of the year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890181542,"gmtCreate":1628086866986,"gmtModify":1633753716694,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good insights","listText":"Good insights","text":"Good insights","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890181542","repostId":"2156101387","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806678591,"gmtCreate":1627655593513,"gmtModify":1633757367980,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Going to keep an eye on this","listText":"Going to keep an eye on this","text":"Going to keep an eye on this","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806678591","repostId":"1109167679","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2048,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806671529,"gmtCreate":1627655550361,"gmtModify":1633757368546,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806671529","repostId":"1110111987","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1654,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806647053,"gmtCreate":1627655356472,"gmtModify":1633757371516,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806647053","repostId":"1198853414","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2070,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806299949,"gmtCreate":1627656199881,"gmtModify":1633757356168,"author":{"id":"4088245287047370","authorId":"4088245287047370","name":"Iamthomasss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1768d91d8650b04728f71cda85ed8e94","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088245287047370","authorIdStr":"4088245287047370"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/806299949","repostId":"1154453753","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154453753","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627649588,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154453753?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-30 20:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154453753","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. ","content":"<p>Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.</p><p><blockquote>电子商务巨头亚马逊的股价在超出华尔街盈利预期后正在下跌。如果你以前听说过，请阻止我们。亚马逊股价的典型结果是下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Yes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.</p><p><blockquote>是的，投资者总是有理由感到紧张，而这一次的原因不是收益本身。亚马逊（股票代码：AMZN）报告未经调整的每股收益为15.12美元。华尔街的目标是每股12.28美元。相反，该公司预测下一季度在线销售将放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.</p><p><blockquote>该股在盘前交易中下跌6.7%。亚马逊可能是标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别下跌0.6%和0.3%的原因。亚马逊吸走了市场的风。</blockquote></p><p> If shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价周五收盘下跌（看起来很有可能会下跌），这将是过去12个季度中第九次盈利超出预期，也是第六次在超出预期后下跌。换句话说，无论盈利有多好，亚马逊股价都有67%的可能性下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Investors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.</p><p><blockquote>然而，关注第三季度的投资者可能没有抓住要点。投资者应该记住的是，在本系列开始时（2018年第三季度），亚马逊股票的交易价格约为每股1,782美元。周四收盘价接近每股3,600美元。这相当于年平均回报率约为29%。还不错。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take&nbsp;Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s&nbsp;quarter shows&nbsp;strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告是有趣的事情。他们往往会证实投资者已经知道的事情。以卡特彼勒（CAT）为例。卡特彼勒和亚马逊几乎没有共同之处，只是它们都在周四收盘和周五开盘之间发布了报告。随着经济复苏和大宗商品成本上涨的压力，卡特彼勒的季度需求强劲。并不令人震惊。是的，它的股价下跌了2.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告很少改变投资论点。是的，有时真正的重磅炸弹会落下。对于亚马逊来说，疫情带来的在线销售放缓不太可能像周五令人震惊的交易所表明的那样。</blockquote></p><p> That’s our hunch.</p><p><blockquote>这是我们的预感。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is Cratering After Its Earnings Beat Estimates. It Usually Does That.<blockquote>亚马逊在盈利超出预期后陷入困境。它通常是这样的。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-30 20:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.</p><p><blockquote>电子商务巨头亚马逊的股价在超出华尔街盈利预期后正在下跌。如果你以前听说过，请阻止我们。亚马逊股价的典型结果是下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Yes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.</p><p><blockquote>是的，投资者总是有理由感到紧张，而这一次的原因不是收益本身。亚马逊（股票代码：AMZN）报告未经调整的每股收益为15.12美元。华尔街的目标是每股12.28美元。相反，该公司预测下一季度在线销售将放缓。</blockquote></p><p> The stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.</p><p><blockquote>该股在盘前交易中下跌6.7%。亚马逊可能是标准普尔500指数和道琼斯工业平均指数期货分别下跌0.6%和0.3%的原因。亚马逊吸走了市场的风。</blockquote></p><p> If shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.</p><p><blockquote>如果股价周五收盘下跌（看起来很有可能会下跌），这将是过去12个季度中第九次盈利超出预期，也是第六次在超出预期后下跌。换句话说，无论盈利有多好，亚马逊股价都有67%的可能性下跌。</blockquote></p><p> Investors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.</p><p><blockquote>然而，关注第三季度的投资者可能没有抓住要点。投资者应该记住的是，在本系列开始时（2018年第三季度），亚马逊股票的交易价格约为每股1,782美元。周四收盘价接近每股3,600美元。这相当于年平均回报率约为29%。还不错。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take&nbsp;Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s&nbsp;quarter shows&nbsp;strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告是有趣的事情。他们往往会证实投资者已经知道的事情。以卡特彼勒（CAT）为例。卡特彼勒和亚马逊几乎没有共同之处，只是它们都在周四收盘和周五开盘之间发布了报告。随着经济复苏和大宗商品成本上涨的压力，卡特彼勒的季度需求强劲。并不令人震惊。是的，它的股价下跌了2.4%。</blockquote></p><p> Quarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.</p><p><blockquote>季度报告很少改变投资论点。是的，有时真正的重磅炸弹会落下。对于亚马逊来说，疫情带来的在线销售放缓不太可能像周五令人震惊的交易所表明的那样。</blockquote></p><p> That’s our hunch.</p><p><blockquote>这是我们的预感。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-stock-earnings-beat-drop-51627648377?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/amazon-stock-earnings-beat-drop-51627648377?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154453753","content_text":"Stock in e-commerce behemoth Amazon.com is dropping after beating Wall Street earnings projections. Stop us if you have heard that before. A beat and drop is the typical outcome for Amazon shares.\nYes, investors always have reasons to get nervous, and this time the reason isn’t the earnings themselves. Amazon.com (ticker: AMZN) reported $15.12 in unadjusted per-share earnings. Wall Street was looking for $12.28 a share. Instead, the company forecasts a slowdown in online sales for the coming quarter.\nThe stock is down 6.7% in premarket trading. Amazon is probably the reason S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures are down 0.6% and 0.3%, respectively. Amazon sucked the wind out of the market.\nIf shares finish down Friday—and it looks very likely they will—it will be the ninth earnings beat during the past 12 quarters, and the sixth time it has dropped following a beat. In other words, there’s a 67% chance that Amazon stock drops no matter how good the earnings are.\nInvestors focused on the third quarter, however, might be missing the point. What investors should remember is at the start of this series—the third quarter of 2018—Amazon stock was trading at about $1,782 a share. It closed Thursday at almost $3,600 a share. That works out to an annual average return of roughly 29%. Not bad.\nQuarterly reports are funny things. More often than not they confirm what investors already know. Take Caterpillar(CAT). Cat and Amazon have little in common except they both reported between the close of trading Thursday and the opening of trading on Friday. Cat’s quarter shows strong demand as the economy recovers and pressure from rising commodity costs. Not a shocker. And yes its stock is down 2.4%.\nQuarterly reports rarely change an investment thesis. Yes, sometimes true bombshells get dropped. For Amazon, it isn’t likely that online sales slowing coming out of the pandemic qualifies as the bombshell Friday trading seems to indicate though.\nThat’s our hunch.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":994,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}