Saras的个人主页 - 老虎社区

Saras

Saras

暂无个人介绍

IP属地：未知

427关注

8粉丝

0主题

0勋章

2021-11-10

👍🏼

@看遍世界景赚足天下钱:不能太经验主义

2021-09-30

👍🏼

@晚点LatePost:晚点独家丨恒大汽车要放假了

2021-09-18

👍🏼

@鑫鑫洋:参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。@小虎活动这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！

2021-09-18

👍🏼

@鑫鑫洋:参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。@小虎活动这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！

2021-09-16

👍🏼

@gugu:中证500定投停止，安心持有

2021-09-11

👍🏼

@UTOtrader:$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ppowering down to 13.01

2021-09-05

👍🏼//@鑫鑫Jason:[Cover your face] Good words are hard to persuade...! Don't say it, it doesn't sound good!

@毕肯证券学院:美股大盘涨不停，自己账户却不动？谜底在这里

2021-08-18

👍🏼

3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote>

2021-08-04

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-26

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-26

👍🏼

Amazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote>

2021-07-25

👍🏼

US IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote>

2021-07-23

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-23

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-19

👍🏼

How the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote>

2021-07-18

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-16

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-16

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-07

Great info

抱歉，原内容已删除

2021-07-07

👍🏼

抱歉，原内容已删除

去老虎APP查看更多动态

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586338902882279","uuid":"3586338902882279","gmtCreate":1623244878654,"gmtModify":1623404525378,"name":"Saras","pinyin":"saras","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":8,"headSize":427,"tweetSize":42,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969-3","templateUuid":"35ec162348d5460f88c959321e554969","name":"传说交易员","description":"证券或期货账户累计交易次数达到300次","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.11.14","exceedPercentage":"93.14%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d-2","templateUuid":"228c86a078844d74991fff2b7ab2428d","name":"投资总监虎","description":"证券账户累计交易金额达到30万美元","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.80%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561-1","templateUuid":"e50ce593bb40487ebfb542ca54f6a561","name":"出道虎友","description":"加入老虎社区500天","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.10.26","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37-1","templateUuid":"976c19eed35f4cd78f17501c2e99ef37","name":"博闻投资者","description":"累计交易超过10只正股","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a-1","templateUuid":"518b5610c3e8410da5cfad115e4b0f5a","name":"实盘交易者","description":"完成一笔实盘交易","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":"未知","starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":847448035,"gmtCreate":1636549937917,"gmtModify":1636549938115,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847448035","repostId":"847422820","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":847422820,"gmtCreate":1636547935427,"gmtModify":1636628008944,"author":{"id":"3466684903067182","authorId":"3466684903067182","name":"看遍世界景赚足天下钱","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/036367fd006fdcb94e383902a9d8277a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3466684903067182","idStr":"3466684903067182"},"themes":[],"title":"不能太经验主义","htmlText":"今天看到朋友圈有人发房价的冬天已经过去，春天即将到来，说的是高盛最近开始卖内地优质开放商的企业债，然后就这件事说外资已经看好中国房地产市场，开始抄底了。看后我觉得莫名其妙，一是优质的中国房企的企业债权外资一直在买呀，又不是今天才买，像龙湖、万科、中海这些现金流和负债率都正常的企业，为什么不买呢？二是高盛一家的买债行为并不构成所谓的外资和市场信心。三是中国的房地产市场之前的确是经历过多轮的抑制后反弹，但是这样的历史经验并不能套用于当下的情况。市场和环境一直在更新，有些历史会重演，但是如果按部就班拿着个别以前的历史现象来解释当下，那是比较危险的。投资里也是。不能说一支股在之前某些事件触发了他的上涨就觉得之后的类似事件都会触发上涨。经验主义在市场里并不时常奏效，而最最关键的，还是理性思考、更新思维、步步为营。","listText":"今天看到朋友圈有人发房价的冬天已经过去，春天即将到来，说的是高盛最近开始卖内地优质开放商的企业债，然后就这件事说外资已经看好中国房地产市场，开始抄底了。看后我觉得莫名其妙，一是优质的中国房企的企业债权外资一直在买呀，又不是今天才买，像龙湖、万科、中海这些现金流和负债率都正常的企业，为什么不买呢？二是高盛一家的买债行为并不构成所谓的外资和市场信心。三是中国的房地产市场之前的确是经历过多轮的抑制后反弹，但是这样的历史经验并不能套用于当下的情况。市场和环境一直在更新，有些历史会重演，但是如果按部就班拿着个别以前的历史现象来解释当下，那是比较危险的。投资里也是。不能说一支股在之前某些事件触发了他的上涨就觉得之后的类似事件都会触发上涨。经验主义在市场里并不时常奏效，而最最关键的，还是理性思考、更新思维、步步为营。","text":"今天看到朋友圈有人发房价的冬天已经过去，春天即将到来，说的是高盛最近开始卖内地优质开放商的企业债，然后就这件事说外资已经看好中国房地产市场，开始抄底了。看后我觉得莫名其妙，一是优质的中国房企的企业债权外资一直在买呀，又不是今天才买，像龙湖、万科、中海这些现金流和负债率都正常的企业，为什么不买呢？二是高盛一家的买债行为并不构成所谓的外资和市场信心。三是中国的房地产市场之前的确是经历过多轮的抑制后反弹，但是这样的历史经验并不能套用于当下的情况。市场和环境一直在更新，有些历史会重演，但是如果按部就班拿着个别以前的历史现象来解释当下，那是比较危险的。投资里也是。不能说一支股在之前某些事件触发了他的上涨就觉得之后的类似事件都会触发上涨。经验主义在市场里并不时常奏效，而最最关键的，还是理性思考、更新思维、步步为营。","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/847422820","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1999,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":865243437,"gmtCreate":1632992201865,"gmtModify":1632992202059,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/865243437","repostId":"865227980","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":865227980,"gmtCreate":1632990517059,"gmtModify":1632990993756,"author":{"id":"3530336145106436","authorId":"3530336145106436","name":"晚点LatePost","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/531321f8976ba58ccfb7b3f9392b485b","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3530336145106436","idStr":"3530336145106436"},"themes":[],"title":"晚点独家丨恒大汽车要放假了","htmlText":"恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。 文 | 王海璐编辑 | 程曼祺十一节后，恒大汽车的很多员工可能并不需要如期到岗。多位恒大汽车的员工对《晚点 LatePost》表示，他们所在的部门通知十一假期后继续休假到 10 月底。与恒驰 5、恒驰 6 两款车无关的研发人员，上海和广州南沙制造基地的大部分生产人员都将参与轮休。目前恒大汽车通知休假是 “带薪” 的，但多位员工表示，他们与恒大签的劳动合同，薪资结构由底薪加绩效构成，每月 5 日、20 日各发一半。“带薪” 的最低发放标准实际上是半薪。一位上海的员工表示，现在办公室里人心惶惶，“大家都在刷简历。”2019 年 8 月，恒大发布新品牌 “恒驰”，委托外部设计公司同时开发十几款车，称 2025 年实现年产销 100 万辆，2035 年则要超过 500 万辆。两年来，恒大围绕产业链上游大举投资、收购，在多地建设工厂。但研发进展并不顺利，这一问题正随着恒大集团资金链紧张而进一步放大。一位恒大研究院的研发人员表示，恒大汽车今年上半年有 6 个车型项目在同步开发，但不久前停止了其他项目，只保留进展最快的恒驰 5、恒驰 6。原计划用来生产这两款车的广州、上海工厂，目前已经停止投产准备。一部分负责生产的外包工程人员已经被遣散。恒驰 5 从广州运到天津继续生产，上海和广州基地的生产人员也被分批抽调到天津支援。恒大汽车在天津、上海、广州均设有工厂和研究院。天津工厂由恒大汽车收购的 NEVS（国能汽车）兴建，具备生产资质。广州和上海工厂均为恒大建设，但不具备生产资质。一位知情人士称，恒大起初可能希望曲线拿牌，但随着资金问题愈发严重，把恒驰 5 运到天津工厂生产的可行性更高。但天津工厂的生产设备是按照此前国能 “NEVS 93” 车型设计的，现在用来生产恒驰 5，还需要重新对生产线进行改造。恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。恒大汽车曾在去年 9 月","listText":"恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。 文 | 王海璐编辑 | 程曼祺十一节后，恒大汽车的很多员工可能并不需要如期到岗。多位恒大汽车的员工对《晚点 LatePost》表示，他们所在的部门通知十一假期后继续休假到 10 月底。与恒驰 5、恒驰 6 两款车无关的研发人员，上海和广州南沙制造基地的大部分生产人员都将参与轮休。目前恒大汽车通知休假是 “带薪” 的，但多位员工表示，他们与恒大签的劳动合同，薪资结构由底薪加绩效构成，每月 5 日、20 日各发一半。“带薪” 的最低发放标准实际上是半薪。一位上海的员工表示，现在办公室里人心惶惶，“大家都在刷简历。”2019 年 8 月，恒大发布新品牌 “恒驰”，委托外部设计公司同时开发十几款车，称 2025 年实现年产销 100 万辆，2035 年则要超过 500 万辆。两年来，恒大围绕产业链上游大举投资、收购，在多地建设工厂。但研发进展并不顺利，这一问题正随着恒大集团资金链紧张而进一步放大。一位恒大研究院的研发人员表示，恒大汽车今年上半年有 6 个车型项目在同步开发，但不久前停止了其他项目，只保留进展最快的恒驰 5、恒驰 6。原计划用来生产这两款车的广州、上海工厂，目前已经停止投产准备。一部分负责生产的外包工程人员已经被遣散。恒驰 5 从广州运到天津继续生产，上海和广州基地的生产人员也被分批抽调到天津支援。恒大汽车在天津、上海、广州均设有工厂和研究院。天津工厂由恒大汽车收购的 NEVS（国能汽车）兴建，具备生产资质。广州和上海工厂均为恒大建设，但不具备生产资质。一位知情人士称，恒大起初可能希望曲线拿牌，但随着资金问题愈发严重，把恒驰 5 运到天津工厂生产的可行性更高。但天津工厂的生产设备是按照此前国能 “NEVS 93” 车型设计的，现在用来生产恒驰 5，还需要重新对生产线进行改造。恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。恒大汽车曾在去年 9 月","text":"恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。 文 | 王海璐编辑 | 程曼祺十一节后，恒大汽车的很多员工可能并不需要如期到岗。多位恒大汽车的员工对《晚点 LatePost》表示，他们所在的部门通知十一假期后继续休假到 10 月底。与恒驰 5、恒驰 6 两款车无关的研发人员，上海和广州南沙制造基地的大部分生产人员都将参与轮休。目前恒大汽车通知休假是 “带薪” 的，但多位员工表示，他们与恒大签的劳动合同，薪资结构由底薪加绩效构成，每月 5 日、20 日各发一半。“带薪” 的最低发放标准实际上是半薪。一位上海的员工表示，现在办公室里人心惶惶，“大家都在刷简历。”2019 年 8 月，恒大发布新品牌 “恒驰”，委托外部设计公司同时开发十几款车，称 2025 年实现年产销 100 万辆，2035 年则要超过 500 万辆。两年来，恒大围绕产业链上游大举投资、收购，在多地建设工厂。但研发进展并不顺利，这一问题正随着恒大集团资金链紧张而进一步放大。一位恒大研究院的研发人员表示，恒大汽车今年上半年有 6 个车型项目在同步开发，但不久前停止了其他项目，只保留进展最快的恒驰 5、恒驰 6。原计划用来生产这两款车的广州、上海工厂，目前已经停止投产准备。一部分负责生产的外包工程人员已经被遣散。恒驰 5 从广州运到天津继续生产，上海和广州基地的生产人员也被分批抽调到天津支援。恒大汽车在天津、上海、广州均设有工厂和研究院。天津工厂由恒大汽车收购的 NEVS（国能汽车）兴建，具备生产资质。广州和上海工厂均为恒大建设，但不具备生产资质。一位知情人士称，恒大起初可能希望曲线拿牌，但随着资金问题愈发严重，把恒驰 5 运到天津工厂生产的可行性更高。但天津工厂的生产设备是按照此前国能 “NEVS 93” 车型设计的，现在用来生产恒驰 5，还需要重新对生产线进行改造。恒大汽车的资金链问题已经不是秘密。恒大汽车曾在去年 9 月","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/01b731f010bf61b480bf39bb0107092f","width":"1080","height":"459"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/865227980","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":887360770,"gmtCreate":1631977673690,"gmtModify":1632804996743,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887360770","repostId":"887338467","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":887338467,"gmtCreate":1631973029259,"gmtModify":1631973029259,"author":{"id":"3443259955812259","authorId":"3443259955812259","name":"鑫鑫洋","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d2f1f10442d11e847ff989eb36f7a0","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3443259955812259","idStr":"3443259955812259"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","listText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","text":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。@小虎活动这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f3044f5fedd823847e13b1c45b2eec6","width":"1620","height":"1080"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5e311c5a77a11b583ce5677b6a18154","width":"500","height":"613"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5535c1253b678f0ace5413f59947416","width":"600","height":"590"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887338467","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":887360425,"gmtCreate":1631977651567,"gmtModify":1632804996865,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887360425","repostId":"887338467","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":887338467,"gmtCreate":1631973029259,"gmtModify":1631973029259,"author":{"id":"3443259955812259","authorId":"3443259955812259","name":"鑫鑫洋","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d2f1f10442d11e847ff989eb36f7a0","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3443259955812259","idStr":"3443259955812259"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","listText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","text":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。@小虎活动这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f3044f5fedd823847e13b1c45b2eec6","width":"1620","height":"1080"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5e311c5a77a11b583ce5677b6a18154","width":"500","height":"613"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5535c1253b678f0ace5413f59947416","width":"600","height":"590"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887338467","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1539,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":885614712,"gmtCreate":1631785061736,"gmtModify":1631885865365,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/885614712","repostId":"882546384","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":882546384,"gmtCreate":1631711607948,"gmtModify":1744960736349,"author":{"id":"387611620380","authorId":"387611620380","name":"gugu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/tiger_upload_file_1449509381.png","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"387611620380","idStr":"387611620380"},"themes":[],"title":"中证500定投停止，安心持有","htmlText":"鉴于“能打能抗6人组”组合消费为主，估值较高。2021年4月底，我开始定投“不动如山的稳健低估组合”。目前持仓：45%中证500加强、30%中概50 、17%沪深300加强 、8%中证1000加强。——整体策略：定投低估、roe趋势性上行的宽指，高估时卖出（80%百分位以上）；——沪深300的pe在12左右，10年的pe百分位50%时，定投买入；——中证500，定投结束，9月13日，中证500最后一次定投；——中概50：定投中，当日下跌2%卖入，已买入5万（9月8日、9月9日、9月14日）。组合目前盈利3.5%，每周定投1-2次。今天重点说说为什么中证500定投暂停。自从7月18日发文《<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/173310891\" target=\"_blank\">中证500，一路向北</a>》文中已有2个月，估计大多数人是挣钱的。为什么今年白马业绩普遍承压，而中证500指数成分股盈利增长这么高呢？查询一下中证500的行业组成，其实就能明白。它是一个资源11.1%（金属&amp;矿）+9.7%化工+电器设备6.1%+电子设备5.3%+半导体5.3%+航空国防3.8%的股票组合，以上行业占比41%。上半年，周期股（石油、煤炭、化工）涨幅惊人，每股收益提升，股价翻了一番，pe还是在低位，有的甚至比年初还低。半导体、国防、电子设备，也是一直涨，这里面既有上半年营收利润的提升，也有行业前景的想象空间。之前我从pe角度看，觉得中证500极端低估，10年pe百分位是9.6%。近日，顾虑到中证500的成分股有一定的周期性，我又用近10年的pb百分位看，当前PB=2.2，大约在40%分位点。实际上估值不算极端低估。（见图1）图1：中证500近10年PB和收盘点位搞明白这个问题，也让我一直的疑惑找到答案。今年4月下旬开始，中证500pe（蓝色线）向下，股价","listText":"鉴于“能打能抗6人组”组合消费为主，估值较高。2021年4月底，我开始定投“不动如山的稳健低估组合”。目前持仓：45%中证500加强、30%中概50 、17%沪深300加强 、8%中证1000加强。——整体策略：定投低估、roe趋势性上行的宽指，高估时卖出（80%百分位以上）；——沪深300的pe在12左右，10年的pe百分位50%时，定投买入；——中证500，定投结束，9月13日，中证500最后一次定投；——中概50：定投中，当日下跌2%卖入，已买入5万（9月8日、9月9日、9月14日）。组合目前盈利3.5%，每周定投1-2次。今天重点说说为什么中证500定投暂停。自从7月18日发文《<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/173310891\" target=\"_blank\">中证500，一路向北</a>》文中已有2个月，估计大多数人是挣钱的。为什么今年白马业绩普遍承压，而中证500指数成分股盈利增长这么高呢？查询一下中证500的行业组成，其实就能明白。它是一个资源11.1%（金属&amp;矿）+9.7%化工+电器设备6.1%+电子设备5.3%+半导体5.3%+航空国防3.8%的股票组合，以上行业占比41%。上半年，周期股（石油、煤炭、化工）涨幅惊人，每股收益提升，股价翻了一番，pe还是在低位，有的甚至比年初还低。半导体、国防、电子设备，也是一直涨，这里面既有上半年营收利润的提升，也有行业前景的想象空间。之前我从pe角度看，觉得中证500极端低估，10年pe百分位是9.6%。近日，顾虑到中证500的成分股有一定的周期性，我又用近10年的pb百分位看，当前PB=2.2，大约在40%分位点。实际上估值不算极端低估。（见图1）图1：中证500近10年PB和收盘点位搞明白这个问题，也让我一直的疑惑找到答案。今年4月下旬开始，中证500pe（蓝色线）向下，股价","text":"鉴于“能打能抗6人组”组合消费为主，估值较高。2021年4月底，我开始定投“不动如山的稳健低估组合”。目前持仓：45%中证500加强、30%中概50 、17%沪深300加强 、8%中证1000加强。——整体策略：定投低估、roe趋势性上行的宽指，高估时卖出（80%百分位以上）；——沪深300的pe在12左右，10年的pe百分位50%时，定投买入；——中证500，定投结束，9月13日，中证500最后一次定投；——中概50：定投中，当日下跌2%卖入，已买入5万（9月8日、9月9日、9月14日）。组合目前盈利3.5%，每周定投1-2次。今天重点说说为什么中证500定投暂停。自从7月18日发文《中证500，一路向北》文中已有2个月，估计大多数人是挣钱的。为什么今年白马业绩普遍承压，而中证500指数成分股盈利增长这么高呢？查询一下中证500的行业组成，其实就能明白。它是一个资源11.1%（金属&矿）+9.7%化工+电器设备6.1%+电子设备5.3%+半导体5.3%+航空国防3.8%的股票组合，以上行业占比41%。上半年，周期股（石油、煤炭、化工）涨幅惊人，每股收益提升，股价翻了一番，pe还是在低位，有的甚至比年初还低。半导体、国防、电子设备，也是一直涨，这里面既有上半年营收利润的提升，也有行业前景的想象空间。之前我从pe角度看，觉得中证500极端低估，10年pe百分位是9.6%。近日，顾虑到中证500的成分股有一定的周期性，我又用近10年的pb百分位看，当前PB=2.2，大约在40%分位点。实际上估值不算极端低估。（见图1）图1：中证500近10年PB和收盘点位搞明白这个问题，也让我一直的疑惑找到答案。今年4月下旬开始，中证500pe（蓝色线）向下，股价","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/788290004185aa0c316fdcbcf20fb70b","width":"688","height":"323"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/882546384","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":1,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881330242,"gmtCreate":1631289781586,"gmtModify":1631887313580,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/881330242","repostId":"881941402","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":881941402,"gmtCreate":1631287383906,"gmtModify":1631883628079,"author":{"id":"3574547619690492","authorId":"3574547619690492","name":"UTOtrader","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82be6befb29ac8516e463638d3f659d5","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574547619690492","idStr":"3574547619690492"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>ppowering down to 13.01","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>ppowering down to 13.01","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ppowering down to 13.01","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/881941402","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1750,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":814612226,"gmtCreate":1630812037265,"gmtModify":1631887313593,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3443259955812259\">@鑫鑫Jason</a>:[Cover your face] &nbsp; Good words are hard to persuade...! Don't say it, it doesn't sound good!","listText":"👍🏼//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3443259955812259\">@鑫鑫Jason</a>:[Cover your face] &nbsp; Good words are hard to persuade...! Don't say it, it doesn't sound good!","text":"👍🏼//@鑫鑫Jason:[Cover your face] Good words are hard to persuade...! Don't say it, it doesn't sound good!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/814612226","repostId":"814041366","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":814041366,"gmtCreate":1630732661855,"gmtModify":1630742789495,"author":{"id":"3568953285250743","authorId":"3568953285250743","name":"毕肯证券学院","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80e5d5a312be5a119aed23e589ea95e6","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3568953285250743","idStr":"3568953285250743"},"themes":[],"title":"美股大盘涨不停，自己账户却不动？谜底在这里","htmlText":"本期【毕肯说：美股投资】来自毕肯证券学院【船老大老师】：1. 二季度美股大盘涨不停，但数据显示散户们却是亏损2. 原因一: 国内散户投资美股多操盘中概股3. 中概股是美股里的小众，值得投资的优质标的很少。目前大环境对中概股也不友好。4. 原因二: 国内投资者基于国内市场产生的美股热点认知偏差。国内的热点在美股里却可能并非热点，比如太阳能，电动车。另外由于思维定势，有人沉浸于过去，持续追逐过往强势股如电动车TSLA5. 原因三，恐\"高\"心理作祟。此\"高\"非大盘高位，而是很多优质股的\"高\"价格。\"高\"价优质股通常好赚钱，因为机构多看好此类股票。6. 原因四，近来股市板块飞速轮转。指数涨，但很多个股板块却可能会跌。简单buy and hold不奏效。7. 原因五，风控不到位。美股投资风控的一个有效工具是对冲。8.小结，美股入门易，赚钱难。美股交易知识储备，交易系统很重要美股大盘涨不停，自己账户却不动？谜底在这里<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IWM\">$罗素2000指数ETF(IWM)$</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$标普500ETF(SPY)$</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">$纳指ETF(QQQ)$</a>","listText":"本期【毕肯说：美股投资】来自毕肯证券学院【船老大老师】：1. 二季度美股大盘涨不停，但数据显示散户们却是亏损2. 原因一: 国内散户投资美股多操盘中概股3. 中概股是美股里的小众，值得投资的优质标的很少。目前大环境对中概股也不友好。4. 原因二: 国内投资者基于国内市场产生的美股热点认知偏差。国内的热点在美股里却可能并非热点，比如太阳能，电动车。另外由于思维定势，有人沉浸于过去，持续追逐过往强势股如电动车TSLA5. 原因三，恐\"高\"心理作祟。此\"高\"非大盘高位，而是很多优质股的\"高\"价格。\"高\"价优质股通常好赚钱，因为机构多看好此类股票。6. 原因四，近来股市板块飞速轮转。指数涨，但很多个股板块却可能会跌。简单buy and hold不奏效。7. 原因五，风控不到位。美股投资风控的一个有效工具是对冲。8.小结，美股入门易，赚钱难。美股交易知识储备，交易系统很重要美股大盘涨不停，自己账户却不动？谜底在这里<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IWM\">$罗素2000指数ETF(IWM)$</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPY\">$标普500ETF(SPY)$</a><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QQQ\">$纳指ETF(QQQ)$</a>","text":"本期【毕肯说：美股投资】来自毕肯证券学院【船老大老师】：1. 二季度美股大盘涨不停，但数据显示散户们却是亏损2. 原因一: 国内散户投资美股多操盘中概股3. 中概股是美股里的小众，值得投资的优质标的很少。目前大环境对中概股也不友好。4. 原因二: 国内投资者基于国内市场产生的美股热点认知偏差。国内的热点在美股里却可能并非热点，比如太阳能，电动车。另外由于思维定势，有人沉浸于过去，持续追逐过往强势股如电动车TSLA5. 原因三，恐\"高\"心理作祟。此\"高\"非大盘高位，而是很多优质股的\"高\"价格。\"高\"价优质股通常好赚钱，因为机构多看好此类股票。6. 原因四，近来股市板块飞速轮转。指数涨，但很多个股板块却可能会跌。简单buy and hold不奏效。7. 原因五，风控不到位。美股投资风控的一个有效工具是对冲。8.小结，美股入门易，赚钱难。美股交易知识储备，交易系统很重要美股大盘涨不停，自己账户却不动？谜底在这里$罗素2000指数ETF(IWM)$$标普500ETF(SPY)$$纳指ETF(QQQ)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/814041366","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2682,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},{"id":833767889,"gmtCreate":1629265025441,"gmtModify":1631885865390,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833767889","repostId":"1114320591","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114320591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629255336,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1114320591?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-18 10:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114320591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The best investors in the world swear by holding high-quality companies for decades on end. These stocks fit that bill.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Time plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.</li>  <li>These three business titans are leaders in their fields.</li>  <li>They are also built to last for a very long time.</li> </ul> </p><p><blockquote><ul><li>时间加上耐心，就能在股市中积累财富。</li><li>这三个商业巨头都是各自领域的领导者。</li><li>它们也可以持续很长时间。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> I'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我即将向您展示我最喜欢的股票。有时我投资时着眼于未来几年的丰厚回报。我预计这些产品将在未来几年甚至几十年内继续跑赢市场。要把它们从我的投资组合中撬出来需要很大的努力。</blockquote></p><p> Let me show you why I intend to hold&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>(NASDAQ:NFLX),<b>Alphabet</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and&nbsp;<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.</p><p><blockquote>让我告诉你为什么我打算持有<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），<b>Alphabet</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL），以及<b>迪斯尼</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）长期来看。这些股票可能不是每个投资者都能永远持有的股票，但你绝对应该仔细看看这些顶级投资。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Netflix</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.奈飞</b></blockquote></p><p> First, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in&nbsp;2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>首先，你知道网飞是红色邮购DVD租赁的发送者。该公司于2007年将数字视频流作为DVD客户的免费附加服务推出，然后于2011年将流媒体业务分离为单独的订阅服务。Qwikster事件是一个巨大的营销混乱，当然可以处理得更好，但从长远来看，这绝对是正确的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Going all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:</p><p><blockquote>全力投入全数字流媒体服务使Netflix能够在全球范围内推出付费订阅计划，并辅以对原创内容的雄心勃勃的关注。用户数量从2011年夏天的2600万飙升至今天的2.09亿。这种奇妙的趋势为公司的营收和利润创造了奇迹：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/646be4c2a73d68810e962c19efe82476\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>NFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的NFLX收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Netflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix看到了引领收费进入一个全新市场的机会，与DVD邮寄业务相比，该市场的基础设施成本较低，并且具有巨大的全球增长潜力。因此，在美国视频租赁行业占据主导地位的DVD业务被毫不客气地抛到了一边，取而代之的是更好的想法。</blockquote></p><p> These days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.</p><p><blockquote>如今，网飞是一家屡获殊荣的内容生产商，在每个重要市场都拥有无与伦比的分销网络（中国除外，该公司必须通过当地合作伙伴运营）。自Qwikster事件以来，该股的回报率为2,240%，复合年增长率(CAGR)为35.8%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Alphabet</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.Alphabet</b></blockquote></p><p> Alphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet是在线服务巨头谷歌的母公司。最初是斯坦福大学的一个学生项目，很快发展成为世界领先的在线搜索工具。再加上谷歌数字广告工具的赚钱能力，该公司在早期就产生了强劲的现金流。现金利润被再投资于更多的商业想法。谷歌最终在网络浏览器、在线视频、电子邮件和智能手机软件等重要领域建立或购买了拥有无与伦比市场份额的服务。</blockquote></p><p> By 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.</p><p><blockquote>到2015年，联合创始人谢尔盖·布林（Sergey Brin）和拉里·佩奇（Larry Page）得出结论，谷歌的主要搜索和广告业务最终必须逐渐消失，被移动替代品和其他创新所取代。所以公司做了一些大的改变。谷歌聘请了首席财务官露丝·波拉特(Ruth Porat)，她是一位在大型企业融资方面拥有数十年经验的银行业高管。同年晚些时候，该公司更名为Alphabet，并重组为一个由不同业务组成的松散企业集团。</blockquote></p><p> Google is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.</p><p><blockquote>谷歌仍是Alphabet的中坚力量，2020年占控股公司总销售额的99.6%。尽管在自动驾驶汽车和光纤互联网连接领域取得了一些进展，但非谷歌业务仍在定期亏损。与此同时，该公司正在为不确定的未来做准备，开发大量具有巨大长期增长前景和同样大的发展风险的线上和线下业务项目。</blockquote></p><p> If the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.</p><p><blockquote>如果自动驾驶汽车从长远来看行不通，Alphabet可能会在医学研究或新型风能发电机中找到提款机。我们甚至可能从未听说过Alphabet庞大投资组合中的下一个大赢家。如果Alphabet开始从人工智能工具或抗癌药物中赚大钱，大多数消费者可能根本不会认为这些东西是谷歌的业务。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb97b6814df65240bd8f0b4a0690e77e\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>GOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的GOOGL收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Alphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet将继续利用其谷歌传统，但当基于浏览器的搜索和广告业务开始动摇时，也不乏完全不相关的业务可以接管。在此之前，传统搜索业务正在蓬勃发展，Alphabet在10年内回报了投资者912%的回报。年增长率为23.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.华特迪士尼</b></blockquote></p><p> And then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.</p><p><blockquote>然后是近百年的娱乐巨头。老鼠之家是由两个有远见的卡通制作兄弟于1923年创建的。该公司经历了一次世界大战、几次严重的经济衰退、10年来分销和生产技术的进步等等。</blockquote></p><p> The leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.</p><p><blockquote>你今天看到的休闲和娱乐集团与最初的业务相去甚远，最初的业务是一个纯粹的卡通制作工作室。迪士尼世界和迪士尼乐园是文化的试金石。该公司是酒店和度假村服务的领先提供商，包括邮轮公司。我想不出还有哪家公司能像迪士尼一样有效地掌握知识产权货币化的艺术。知识产权——大多数美国人烂熟于心的角色、虚构世界和故事情节——将永远是迪士尼业务的命脉。</blockquote></p><p> Times are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.</p><p><blockquote>现在的日子很艰难，因为冠状病毒大流行关闭了世界各地的电影院、主题公园、度假村和游轮。因此，迪士尼认真审视了娱乐业的剧烈变化，并决定全力支持流媒体平台。</blockquote></p><p> The company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.</p><p><blockquote>该公司已经自上而下进行了重组，以支持迪士尼的流媒体平台。Disney+、Hulu、Hotstar和ESPN+流媒体服务准备在全球媒体流媒体市场挑战网飞，2021年第三季度用户总数达到1.74亿。迪士尼在健康危机最黑暗的日子里承担了一些额外的债务，并且很可能会使用部分闲钱来加速其流媒体业务。</blockquote></p><p> The coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.</p><p><blockquote>冠状病毒让迪士尼措手不及，但管理层毫不犹豫地立即采取行动。整个庞然大物现在正朝着不同的方向前进，得到了让公司走到这一步的同样的讲故事资产宝库的支持。从长远来看，这家管理极其良好的公司也跑赢了市场，10年涨幅为439%，复合年增长率为13%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/110cd288830d0e354767349fe36259e6\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The common denominator</b></p><p><blockquote><b>共同点</b></blockquote></p><p> These three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司非常不同，但它们仍然有一个非常重要的共同点。我在寻找面对顺境和逆境的灵活性。如果你的公司准备在周围的商业环境发生变化时对其运营计划进行重大改变，你知道你有一个经得起时间考验的组织。</blockquote></p><p> Lots of&nbsp;time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.</p><p><blockquote>大量的市场时间等于财富积累的回报。这是你可以从本杰明·格雷厄姆的著作和他的明星学生沃伦·巴菲特的出色成绩中学到的主要教训。积累改变生活的财富并不需要几年的惊人回报。你所需要的只是几十年的稳定收益。</blockquote></p><p> For example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with&nbsp;the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.</p><p><blockquote>例如，10%的年回报率（与长期市场平均水平一致）相当于20年内673%的利润。在这个漫长的时间尺度上，以微弱优势击败街道会产生很大的影响。将您的平均收益提高到11%，您将在这20年内看到806%的回报。更大的增长会带来更大的长期总回报。上面讨论的三只股票的表现比这更好，从长远来看，它们的生存几乎是由市场条件需要时做出改变的意愿来保证的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-18 10:55</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Time plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.</li>  <li>These three business titans are leaders in their fields.</li>  <li>They are also built to last for a very long time.</li> </ul> </p><p><blockquote><ul><li>时间加上耐心，就能在股市中积累财富。</li><li>这三个商业巨头都是各自领域的领导者。</li><li>它们也可以持续很长时间。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> I'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我即将向您展示我最喜欢的股票。有时我投资时着眼于未来几年的丰厚回报。我预计这些产品将在未来几年甚至几十年内继续跑赢市场。要把它们从我的投资组合中撬出来需要很大的努力。</blockquote></p><p> Let me show you why I intend to hold&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>(NASDAQ:NFLX),<b>Alphabet</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and&nbsp;<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.</p><p><blockquote>让我告诉你为什么我打算持有<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），<b>Alphabet</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL），以及<b>迪斯尼</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）长期来看。这些股票可能不是每个投资者都能永远持有的股票，但你绝对应该仔细看看这些顶级投资。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Netflix</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.奈飞</b></blockquote></p><p> First, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in&nbsp;2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>首先，你知道网飞是红色邮购DVD租赁的发送者。该公司于2007年将数字视频流作为DVD客户的免费附加服务推出，然后于2011年将流媒体业务分离为单独的订阅服务。Qwikster事件是一个巨大的营销混乱，当然可以处理得更好，但从长远来看，这绝对是正确的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Going all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:</p><p><blockquote>全力投入全数字流媒体服务使Netflix能够在全球范围内推出付费订阅计划，并辅以对原创内容的雄心勃勃的关注。用户数量从2011年夏天的2600万飙升至今天的2.09亿。这种奇妙的趋势为公司的营收和利润创造了奇迹：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/646be4c2a73d68810e962c19efe82476\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>NFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的NFLX收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Netflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix看到了引领收费进入一个全新市场的机会，与DVD邮寄业务相比，该市场的基础设施成本较低，并且具有巨大的全球增长潜力。因此，在美国视频租赁行业占据主导地位的DVD业务被毫不客气地抛到了一边，取而代之的是更好的想法。</blockquote></p><p> These days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.</p><p><blockquote>如今，网飞是一家屡获殊荣的内容生产商，在每个重要市场都拥有无与伦比的分销网络（中国除外，该公司必须通过当地合作伙伴运营）。自Qwikster事件以来，该股的回报率为2,240%，复合年增长率(CAGR)为35.8%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Alphabet</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.Alphabet</b></blockquote></p><p> Alphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet是在线服务巨头谷歌的母公司。最初是斯坦福大学的一个学生项目，很快发展成为世界领先的在线搜索工具。再加上谷歌数字广告工具的赚钱能力，该公司在早期就产生了强劲的现金流。现金利润被再投资于更多的商业想法。谷歌最终在网络浏览器、在线视频、电子邮件和智能手机软件等重要领域建立或购买了拥有无与伦比市场份额的服务。</blockquote></p><p> By 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.</p><p><blockquote>到2015年，联合创始人谢尔盖·布林（Sergey Brin）和拉里·佩奇（Larry Page）得出结论，谷歌的主要搜索和广告业务最终必须逐渐消失，被移动替代品和其他创新所取代。所以公司做了一些大的改变。谷歌聘请了首席财务官露丝·波拉特(Ruth Porat)，她是一位在大型企业融资方面拥有数十年经验的银行业高管。同年晚些时候，该公司更名为Alphabet，并重组为一个由不同业务组成的松散企业集团。</blockquote></p><p> Google is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.</p><p><blockquote>谷歌仍是Alphabet的中坚力量，2020年占控股公司总销售额的99.6%。尽管在自动驾驶汽车和光纤互联网连接领域取得了一些进展，但非谷歌业务仍在定期亏损。与此同时，该公司正在为不确定的未来做准备，开发大量具有巨大长期增长前景和同样大的发展风险的线上和线下业务项目。</blockquote></p><p> If the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.</p><p><blockquote>如果自动驾驶汽车从长远来看行不通，Alphabet可能会在医学研究或新型风能发电机中找到提款机。我们甚至可能从未听说过Alphabet庞大投资组合中的下一个大赢家。如果Alphabet开始从人工智能工具或抗癌药物中赚大钱，大多数消费者可能根本不会认为这些东西是谷歌的业务。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb97b6814df65240bd8f0b4a0690e77e\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>GOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的GOOGL收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Alphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet将继续利用其谷歌传统，但当基于浏览器的搜索和广告业务开始动摇时，也不乏完全不相关的业务可以接管。在此之前，传统搜索业务正在蓬勃发展，Alphabet在10年内回报了投资者912%的回报。年增长率为23.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.华特迪士尼</b></blockquote></p><p> And then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.</p><p><blockquote>然后是近百年的娱乐巨头。老鼠之家是由两个有远见的卡通制作兄弟于1923年创建的。该公司经历了一次世界大战、几次严重的经济衰退、10年来分销和生产技术的进步等等。</blockquote></p><p> The leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.</p><p><blockquote>你今天看到的休闲和娱乐集团与最初的业务相去甚远，最初的业务是一个纯粹的卡通制作工作室。迪士尼世界和迪士尼乐园是文化的试金石。该公司是酒店和度假村服务的领先提供商，包括邮轮公司。我想不出还有哪家公司能像迪士尼一样有效地掌握知识产权货币化的艺术。知识产权——大多数美国人烂熟于心的角色、虚构世界和故事情节——将永远是迪士尼业务的命脉。</blockquote></p><p> Times are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.</p><p><blockquote>现在的日子很艰难，因为冠状病毒大流行关闭了世界各地的电影院、主题公园、度假村和游轮。因此，迪士尼认真审视了娱乐业的剧烈变化，并决定全力支持流媒体平台。</blockquote></p><p> The company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.</p><p><blockquote>该公司已经自上而下进行了重组，以支持迪士尼的流媒体平台。Disney+、Hulu、Hotstar和ESPN+流媒体服务准备在全球媒体流媒体市场挑战网飞，2021年第三季度用户总数达到1.74亿。迪士尼在健康危机最黑暗的日子里承担了一些额外的债务，并且很可能会使用部分闲钱来加速其流媒体业务。</blockquote></p><p> The coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.</p><p><blockquote>冠状病毒让迪士尼措手不及，但管理层毫不犹豫地立即采取行动。整个庞然大物现在正朝着不同的方向前进，得到了让公司走到这一步的同样的讲故事资产宝库的支持。从长远来看，这家管理极其良好的公司也跑赢了市场，10年涨幅为439%，复合年增长率为13%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/110cd288830d0e354767349fe36259e6\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The common denominator</b></p><p><blockquote><b>共同点</b></blockquote></p><p> These three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司非常不同，但它们仍然有一个非常重要的共同点。我在寻找面对顺境和逆境的灵活性。如果你的公司准备在周围的商业环境发生变化时对其运营计划进行重大改变，你知道你有一个经得起时间考验的组织。</blockquote></p><p> Lots of&nbsp;time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.</p><p><blockquote>大量的市场时间等于财富积累的回报。这是你可以从本杰明·格雷厄姆的著作和他的明星学生沃伦·巴菲特的出色成绩中学到的主要教训。积累改变生活的财富并不需要几年的惊人回报。你所需要的只是几十年的稳定收益。</blockquote></p><p> For example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with&nbsp;the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.</p><p><blockquote>例如，10%的年回报率（与长期市场平均水平一致）相当于20年内673%的利润。在这个漫长的时间尺度上，以微弱优势击败街道会产生很大的影响。将您的平均收益提高到11%，您将在这20年内看到806%的回报。更大的增长会带来更大的长期总回报。上面讨论的三只股票的表现比这更好，从长远来看，它们的生存几乎是由市场条件需要时做出改变的意愿来保证的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/17/3-stocks-im-never-selling/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞","DIS":"迪士尼","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/17/3-stocks-im-never-selling/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114320591","content_text":"Key Points\n\nTime plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.\nThese three business titans are leaders in their fields.\nThey are also built to last for a very long time.\n\n\nI'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.\nLet me show you why I intend to hold Netflix(NASDAQ:NFLX),Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and Walt Disney(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.\n1. Netflix\nFirst, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in 2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.\nGoing all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:\nNFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.\nNetflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.\nThese days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.\n2. Alphabet\nAlphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.\nBy 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.\nGoogle is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.\nIf the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.\nGOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.\nAlphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.\n3. Walt Disney\nAnd then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.\nThe leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.\nTimes are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.\nThe company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.\nThe coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nThe common denominator\nThese three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.\nLots of time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.\nFor example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"NFLX":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1119,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890126788,"gmtCreate":1628087701344,"gmtModify":1631885865431,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890126788","repostId":"2156060681","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1964,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800903922,"gmtCreate":1627269167866,"gmtModify":1631885865491,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/800903922","repostId":"1143726595","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800067199,"gmtCreate":1627266664211,"gmtModify":1631885865535,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/800067199","repostId":"1187084507","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187084507","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627265195,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1187084507?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-26 10:06","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Amazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187084507","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Amazon.com is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD) payments by the end of the year and its","content":"<p><ul>  <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>&nbsp;is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD)&nbsp;payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.</li>  <li>Amazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a&nbsp;City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.</li>  <li>The City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.</li>  <li>Earlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.</li> </ul> <ul></ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>据称，该公司希望在今年年底前接受比特币（BTC-USD）支付，并在明年探索自己的代币。</li><li>据City A.M.报道称，亚马逊自2019年以来一直在制定该计划，该报道援引了一位身份不明的内部人士的话。继比特币之后，这家电子商务巨头预计将接受以太币（ETH-USD）、卡尔达诺（ADA-USD）和比特币现金（BCH-USD），然后该公司将另外八种左右最受欢迎的加密货币上线。</li><li>City A.M.周五有报道称，亚马逊的招聘信息表明了接受加密货币的潜在计划。</li><li>早些时候，在Musk、Wood、Dorsey发表评论后的几天内，比特币股价上涨至接近35,000美元的水平。</li></ul><ul></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-26 10:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>&nbsp;is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD)&nbsp;payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.</li>  <li>Amazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a&nbsp;City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.</li>  <li>The City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.</li>  <li>Earlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.</li> </ul> <ul></ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>据称，该公司希望在今年年底前接受比特币（BTC-USD）支付，并在明年探索自己的代币。</li><li>据City A.M.报道称，亚马逊自2019年以来一直在制定该计划，该报道援引了一位身份不明的内部人士的话。继比特币之后，这家电子商务巨头预计将接受以太币（ETH-USD）、卡尔达诺（ADA-USD）和比特币现金（BCH-USD），然后该公司将另外八种左右最受欢迎的加密货币上线。</li><li>City A.M.周五有报道称，亚马逊的招聘信息表明了接受加密货币的潜在计划。</li><li>早些时候，在Musk、Wood、Dorsey发表评论后的几天内，比特币股价上涨至接近35,000美元的水平。</li></ul><ul></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3718834-amazon-is-said-looking-to-accept-bitcoin-payments-by-the-end-of-the-year\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3718834-amazon-is-said-looking-to-accept-bitcoin-payments-by-the-end-of-the-year","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187084507","content_text":"Amazon.com is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD) payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.\nAmazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.\nThe City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.\nEarlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":641,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177366817,"gmtCreate":1627181391939,"gmtModify":1631885865547,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/177366817","repostId":"1118041582","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118041582","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627175995,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118041582?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-25 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118041582","media":"Renaissance Capital","summary":"After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs schedul","content":"<p>After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在又一周创纪录的活动之后，IPO市场预计将保持火热，未来一周将有17起IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Long-awaited retail brokerage&nbsp;<b>Robinhood Markets</b>(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.</p><p><blockquote>期待已久的零售经纪业务<b>罗宾汉市场</b>(HOOD)计划以368亿美元的市值筹集22亿美元。该公司提供无佣金零售经纪平台，月活跃用户数超过1800万。尽管2021年第一季度的收入实现了三位数的增长，但该平台依赖于交易量，最近的零售交易热潮可能难以为继。</blockquote></p><p> Vehicle battery maker&nbsp;<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.</p><p><blockquote>汽车电池制造商<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY)计划以97亿美元的市值筹集17亿美元。该公司在全球范围内生产低压汽车电池，并表示其在美洲和欧洲、中东和非洲地区拥有第一的市场地位。在息税前利润的基础上，Clarios的收入增长在2020财年因新冠疫情而转为负值后，在2021财年上半年加速。</blockquote></p><p> Altice’s ad-tech platform&nbsp;<b>Teads</b>(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.</p><p><blockquote>Altice的广告技术平台<b>Teads</b>(TEAD)计划以46亿美元的市值筹集7.51亿美元。Teads为广告商和出版商运营一个基于云的程序化数字广告平台。Teads盈利稳健增长，为约3,100家出版商提供货币化服务。</blockquote></p><p> Education software provider&nbsp;<b>PowerSchool Holdings</b>(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>教育软件提供商<b>动力学校控股</b>(PWSC)计划以37亿美元的市值筹集7.5亿美元。该公司为教师提供了一个教育平台，用于管理课堂活动，如收集作业和评分作业。PowerSchool为全球90多个国家的12,000多名客户提供服务，在2021年第一季度实现了净利润盈利。</blockquote></p><p> After withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,<b>Dole</b>(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.</p><p><blockquote>在2018年撤回IPO尝试后，<b>多尔</b>（都乐）计划以20亿美元的市值筹集5.59亿美元。这家领先的水果和蔬菜公司向全球80多个国家提供来自30多个国家的300多种产品。都乐增长缓慢且盈利，其产品是与Total Product合并时推出的。</blockquote></p><p> Language learning platform&nbsp;<b>Duolingo</b>(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>语言学习平台<b>多邻国</b>(DUOL)计划以41亿美元的市值筹集4.6亿美元。多邻国为超过3亿用户提供了一个学习30多种新语言的在线平台。受益于与新冠疫情相关的需求增长，多邻国在2020年实现了三位数的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Traeger</b>(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>特雷格</b>（库克）计划以22亿美元的市值筹集4亿美元。这家公司生产具有技术功能的优质后院木质颗粒烤架，允许业主通过Traeger应用程序对他们的烤架进行编程、监控和控制。Traeger是木质颗粒烤架的类别领导者，从2017年到2020年，收入以28%的CAGR增长。</blockquote></p><p> Israeli anti-fraud firm&nbsp;<b>Riskified</b>(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以色列反欺诈公司<b>风险化</b>(RSKD)计划以31亿美元的市值筹集3.33亿美元。这家公司为企业提供电子商务欺诈保护。Riskified不断增长但尚未盈利，其自由现金流在2021年第一季度上转为正值。</blockquote></p><p> Financial software provider&nbsp;<b>MeridianLink</b>(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.</p><p><blockquote>财务软件提供商<b>子午线链接</b>(MLNK)计划以21亿美元的市值筹集3亿美元。MeridianLink为中端市场社区银行和信用合作社提供基于云的数字借贷和开户平台。尽管业务具有周期性，但由于强劲的抵押贷款活动，该公司在2020财年实现了两位数的有机增长。</blockquote></p><p> Smart home integration system&nbsp;<b>Snap One Holdings</b>(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>智能家居集成系统<b>Snap一号控股</b>(SNPO)计划以15亿美元的市值筹集2.7亿美元。该公司为超过16,000家专业集成商提供智能家居技术产品。Snap一号表现出稳健的增长，并在2021年第一季度按息税前利润计算实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Specialty funding solutions provider&nbsp;<b>Preston Hollow Community Capital</b>(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.</p><p><blockquote>专业融资解决方案提供商<b>普雷斯顿霍洛社区资本</b>(PHCC)计划以23亿美元的市值筹集2亿美元。该公司是为对美国当地社区具有重大社会和经济重要性的项目提供专业影响力融资解决方案的市场领导者。它服务于各种领域，包括基础设施、教育、医疗保健和住房。</blockquote></p><p> Vaccine biotech&nbsp;<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><blockquote>疫苗生物技术<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX)计划以5.9亿美元的市值筹集1.5亿美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术最初专注于利用其病毒样颗粒平台技术开发针对传染性呼吸道疾病的疫苗。其最先进的候选药物目前正处于新型冠状病毒病的1/2期试验中。</blockquote></p><p> Cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Candel Therapeutics</b>(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>癌症生物技术<b>坎德尔治疗公司</b>(CADL)计划以3.98亿美元的市值筹集8500万美元。Candel最先进的候选药物目前正在与前药伐昔洛韦联合治疗新诊断的中度或高风险进展的局限性前列腺癌的3期试验中。该公司预计将在2024年完成2021年第三季度的注册并公布最终数据。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Rare disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Rallybio</b>(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.</p><p><blockquote>罕见病生物技术<b>拉利比奥</b>(RLYB)计划以4.65亿美元的市值筹集8100万美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术正在开发罕见疾病的抗体疗法。其主导项目目前正在1/2期试验中评估治疗胎儿和新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ocean Biomedical</b>(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.</p><p><blockquote><b>海洋生物医学</b>(OCEA)计划以5.06亿美元的市值筹集5000万美元。该公司目前正在开展肿瘤学、纤维化、传染病和炎症方面的临床前项目，这些项目已直接或间接获得布朗大学、斯坦福大学和罗德岛医院的许可。</blockquote></p><p> After postponing in November 2020,<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.</p><p><blockquote>2020年11月延期后，<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB)计划以2.15亿美元的市值筹集4400万美元。这家1期生物技术公司正在开发同种异体γ-δ T细胞疗法来治疗实体瘤。尽管γ-δ T细胞有可能治疗实体瘤，但该公司还处于非常早期的阶段，并且仅为有限数量的患者提供了剂量。</blockquote></p><p> Female cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Context Therapeutics</b>(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.</p><p><blockquote>女性癌症生物技术<b>情境疗法</b>(CNTX)计划以9300万美元的市值筹集2000万美元。背景是开发女性癌症的治疗方法，如乳腺癌、卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌。该公司的主要候选药物目前正处于卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的2期试验中，预计将于21年下半年和22年上半年获得初步结果。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b38a8af5f92621b2633830553616b5d\" tg-width=\"1271\" tg-height=\"702\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5faec597a337345b21c846808295821d\" tg-width=\"1272\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/021cc62ff4eaabd0b6a7dee91fc0d63e\" tg-width=\"1270\" tg-height=\"483\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2021年7月22日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.0%，而标普500上涨16.3%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌3.0%，而ACWX指数上涨8.1%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括EQT Partners和思摩尔国际。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603787993745","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Renaissance Capital</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-25 09:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在又一周创纪录的活动之后，IPO市场预计将保持火热，未来一周将有17起IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Long-awaited retail brokerage&nbsp;<b>Robinhood Markets</b>(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.</p><p><blockquote>期待已久的零售经纪业务<b>罗宾汉市场</b>(HOOD)计划以368亿美元的市值筹集22亿美元。该公司提供无佣金零售经纪平台，月活跃用户数超过1800万。尽管2021年第一季度的收入实现了三位数的增长，但该平台依赖于交易量，最近的零售交易热潮可能难以为继。</blockquote></p><p> Vehicle battery maker&nbsp;<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.</p><p><blockquote>汽车电池制造商<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY)计划以97亿美元的市值筹集17亿美元。该公司在全球范围内生产低压汽车电池，并表示其在美洲和欧洲、中东和非洲地区拥有第一的市场地位。在息税前利润的基础上，Clarios的收入增长在2020财年因新冠疫情而转为负值后，在2021财年上半年加速。</blockquote></p><p> Altice’s ad-tech platform&nbsp;<b>Teads</b>(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.</p><p><blockquote>Altice的广告技术平台<b>Teads</b>(TEAD)计划以46亿美元的市值筹集7.51亿美元。Teads为广告商和出版商运营一个基于云的程序化数字广告平台。Teads盈利稳健增长，为约3,100家出版商提供货币化服务。</blockquote></p><p> Education software provider&nbsp;<b>PowerSchool Holdings</b>(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>教育软件提供商<b>动力学校控股</b>(PWSC)计划以37亿美元的市值筹集7.5亿美元。该公司为教师提供了一个教育平台，用于管理课堂活动，如收集作业和评分作业。PowerSchool为全球90多个国家的12,000多名客户提供服务，在2021年第一季度实现了净利润盈利。</blockquote></p><p> After withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,<b>Dole</b>(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.</p><p><blockquote>在2018年撤回IPO尝试后，<b>多尔</b>（都乐）计划以20亿美元的市值筹集5.59亿美元。这家领先的水果和蔬菜公司向全球80多个国家提供来自30多个国家的300多种产品。都乐增长缓慢且盈利，其产品是与Total Product合并时推出的。</blockquote></p><p> Language learning platform&nbsp;<b>Duolingo</b>(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>语言学习平台<b>多邻国</b>(DUOL)计划以41亿美元的市值筹集4.6亿美元。多邻国为超过3亿用户提供了一个学习30多种新语言的在线平台。受益于与新冠疫情相关的需求增长，多邻国在2020年实现了三位数的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Traeger</b>(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>特雷格</b>（库克）计划以22亿美元的市值筹集4亿美元。这家公司生产具有技术功能的优质后院木质颗粒烤架，允许业主通过Traeger应用程序对他们的烤架进行编程、监控和控制。Traeger是木质颗粒烤架的类别领导者，从2017年到2020年，收入以28%的CAGR增长。</blockquote></p><p> Israeli anti-fraud firm&nbsp;<b>Riskified</b>(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以色列反欺诈公司<b>风险化</b>(RSKD)计划以31亿美元的市值筹集3.33亿美元。这家公司为企业提供电子商务欺诈保护。Riskified不断增长但尚未盈利，其自由现金流在2021年第一季度上转为正值。</blockquote></p><p> Financial software provider&nbsp;<b>MeridianLink</b>(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.</p><p><blockquote>财务软件提供商<b>子午线链接</b>(MLNK)计划以21亿美元的市值筹集3亿美元。MeridianLink为中端市场社区银行和信用合作社提供基于云的数字借贷和开户平台。尽管业务具有周期性，但由于强劲的抵押贷款活动，该公司在2020财年实现了两位数的有机增长。</blockquote></p><p> Smart home integration system&nbsp;<b>Snap One Holdings</b>(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>智能家居集成系统<b>Snap一号控股</b>(SNPO)计划以15亿美元的市值筹集2.7亿美元。该公司为超过16,000家专业集成商提供智能家居技术产品。Snap一号表现出稳健的增长，并在2021年第一季度按息税前利润计算实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Specialty funding solutions provider&nbsp;<b>Preston Hollow Community Capital</b>(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.</p><p><blockquote>专业融资解决方案提供商<b>普雷斯顿霍洛社区资本</b>(PHCC)计划以23亿美元的市值筹集2亿美元。该公司是为对美国当地社区具有重大社会和经济重要性的项目提供专业影响力融资解决方案的市场领导者。它服务于各种领域，包括基础设施、教育、医疗保健和住房。</blockquote></p><p> Vaccine biotech&nbsp;<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><blockquote>疫苗生物技术<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX)计划以5.9亿美元的市值筹集1.5亿美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术最初专注于利用其病毒样颗粒平台技术开发针对传染性呼吸道疾病的疫苗。其最先进的候选药物目前正处于新型冠状病毒病的1/2期试验中。</blockquote></p><p> Cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Candel Therapeutics</b>(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>癌症生物技术<b>坎德尔治疗公司</b>(CADL)计划以3.98亿美元的市值筹集8500万美元。Candel最先进的候选药物目前正在与前药伐昔洛韦联合治疗新诊断的中度或高风险进展的局限性前列腺癌的3期试验中。该公司预计将在2024年完成2021年第三季度的注册并公布最终数据。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Rare disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Rallybio</b>(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.</p><p><blockquote>罕见病生物技术<b>拉利比奥</b>(RLYB)计划以4.65亿美元的市值筹集8100万美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术正在开发罕见疾病的抗体疗法。其主导项目目前正在1/2期试验中评估治疗胎儿和新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ocean Biomedical</b>(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.</p><p><blockquote><b>海洋生物医学</b>(OCEA)计划以5.06亿美元的市值筹集5000万美元。该公司目前正在开展肿瘤学、纤维化、传染病和炎症方面的临床前项目，这些项目已直接或间接获得布朗大学、斯坦福大学和罗德岛医院的许可。</blockquote></p><p> After postponing in November 2020,<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.</p><p><blockquote>2020年11月延期后，<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB)计划以2.15亿美元的市值筹集4400万美元。这家1期生物技术公司正在开发同种异体γ-δ T细胞疗法来治疗实体瘤。尽管γ-δ T细胞有可能治疗实体瘤，但该公司还处于非常早期的阶段，并且仅为有限数量的患者提供了剂量。</blockquote></p><p> Female cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Context Therapeutics</b>(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.</p><p><blockquote>女性癌症生物技术<b>情境疗法</b>(CNTX)计划以9300万美元的市值筹集2000万美元。背景是开发女性癌症的治疗方法，如乳腺癌、卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌。该公司的主要候选药物目前正处于卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的2期试验中，预计将于21年下半年和22年上半年获得初步结果。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b38a8af5f92621b2633830553616b5d\" tg-width=\"1271\" tg-height=\"702\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5faec597a337345b21c846808295821d\" tg-width=\"1272\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/021cc62ff4eaabd0b6a7dee91fc0d63e\" tg-width=\"1270\" tg-height=\"483\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2021年7月22日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.0%，而标普500上涨16.3%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌3.0%，而ACWX指数上涨8.1%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括EQT Partners和思摩尔国际。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/84600/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Robinhood%E2%80%99s-billion-dollar-deal-headlines-a-17-IPO-week\">Renaissance Capital</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","RSKD":"Riskified Ltd.","DOLE":"都乐食品","INAB":"IN8bio, Inc.","FEOVF":"Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.","RLYB":"Rallybio Corp.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SNPO":"Snap One Holdings Corp.","TEAD":"Teads Holding","DUOL":"多邻国","ICVX":"Icosavax, Inc.","PWSC":"PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.","CNTX":"Context Therapeutics Inc.","CADLF":"CADELER AS",".DJI":"道琼斯","COOK":"Traeger Inc. (TGPX Holdings I LLC)","HOOD":"Robinhood","MLNK":"MeridianLink, Inc. (ex-Project Angel Parent, LLC)"},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/84600/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Robinhood%E2%80%99s-billion-dollar-deal-headlines-a-17-IPO-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118041582","content_text":"After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.\nLong-awaited retail brokerage Robinhood Markets(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.\nVehicle battery maker Clarios International(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.\nAltice’s ad-tech platform Teads(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.\nEducation software provider PowerSchool Holdings(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.\nAfter withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,Dole(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.\nLanguage learning platform Duolingo(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.\nTraeger(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.\nIsraeli anti-fraud firm Riskified(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.\nFinancial software provider MeridianLink(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.\nSmart home integration system Snap One Holdings(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.\nSpecialty funding solutions provider Preston Hollow Community Capital(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.\nVaccine biotech Icosavax(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.\nCancer biotech Candel Therapeutics(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.\nRare disease biotech Rallybio(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.\nOcean Biomedical(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.\nAfter postponing in November 2020,IN8bio(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.\nFemale cancer biotech Context Therapeutics(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.\n\nIPO Market Snapshot\nThe Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DUOL":0.9,"CADLF":0.9,"RSKD":0.9,"FEOVF":0.9,"SNPO":0.9,"RLYB":0.9,"DOLE":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"ICVX":0.9,"PWSC":0.9,"PHCC":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"COOK":0.9,"CNTX":0.9,"INAB":0.9,"BTRY":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"HOOD":0.9,"MLNK":0.9,"TEAD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1060,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175160641,"gmtCreate":1627014359483,"gmtModify":1631885865561,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175160641","repostId":"2153918609","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175187150,"gmtCreate":1627014271670,"gmtModify":1631885865621,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175187150","repostId":"2153793716","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1059,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173840976,"gmtCreate":1626654502995,"gmtModify":1631885865443,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173840976","repostId":"1123760994","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123760994","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626652367,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1123760994?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 07:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123760994","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car as","content":"<p>1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.</p><p><blockquote>1913年对美国来说是重要的一年。10月7日，亨利·福特在密歇根州高地公园推出了世界上第一条移动汽车装配线。两个月后，12月23日，国会通过了《美联储法案》，创建了我们国家的中央银行。</blockquote></p><p> The evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.</p><p><blockquote>过去108年来，从福特T型车到特斯拉的Model X，汽车的发展令人惊叹。美联储的进步，好吧，我们只能说慢了。慢多了。</blockquote></p><p> Which brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了我的观点：是的，美联储极大地帮助了我们的经济福祉（通过缓冲我们甚至帮助我们避免经济灾难），是的，它在几十年来扩大了影响力（特别是在20世纪30年代和2008/2009年大衰退之后），但它在引导经济方面的主要工作方式保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> I would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.</p><p><blockquote>我认为这些政策现在已经过时，甚至可能是有害的。是的，美联储的工作总是有一些负面影响，但现在——这是问题的关键——由于美联储最近采取了戏剧性和前所未有的举措，附带损害可能接近超过这些举措本身的好处。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，美联储通过保持低利率来提振经济，不成比例地帮助了富人，从而实际上使那些有需要的人处于不利地位。准确地说，对冲基金类型、公司高管、技术精英等变得越来越富有，而劳动人民、只有高中学历的人、有色人种越来越落后。这不是社会主义者的咩咩叫。这些都是事实，美联储是其中的一方。因此，美联储需要一个唤醒看涨期权，或者也许重置是更好的说法。</blockquote></p><p> I generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.</p><p><blockquote>我通常讨厌抨击美联储。整个家庭手工业大多是阴谋论者，他们哀叹美联储要么行动太早或太晚或太多或太少，要么与三边委员会合谋接管世界。我注意了这一点，并建议你也这样做。</blockquote></p><p> What I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.</p><p><blockquote>不过，我所说的与轻率的事情无关，而是涉及一个复杂的、备受推崇的机构，它已经被锁定在政策中，尽管这些政策是善意的，但现在正在产生可以被解释为对我们的社会和经济有害的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Before I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.</p><p><blockquote>在我进入细节之前，让我们首先明确一下美联储是什么。首先，美联储是一个庞大而复杂的系统（《华盛顿邮报》评级称，这是一个“混乱的系统”），“全国各地有十几家储备银行，加上20个较小的分支机构……以及大约20,000名员工和价值23亿美元的房地产。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.</p><p><blockquote>美联储表示，它“为国家提供安全、灵活和稳定的货币和金融体系”。为了履行这一职责，中央银行履行多种职能，包括监管银行、结算银行等金融机构之间的支付以及促进消费者保护。但当涉及到实际引导经济时，央行会受到所谓的美联储使命的影响，即就业和稳定物价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f77ed796f6c2d18bfa7317337191de5c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">FILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More</p><p><blockquote>文件-在这张2021年5月4日的文件照片中，是华盛顿的美联储。美联储最新的全国商业调查发现，尽管供应链瓶颈导致价格上涨，但经济在5月底和6月初进一步走强。美联储于2021年7月14日星期三表示，其12个地区银行区中有7个报告价格强劲上涨，其他5个报告价格温和上涨。（美联社照片/Patrick Semansky，档案）更多</blockquote></p><p> Congress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>国会在1978年《充分就业和平衡增长法案》（汉弗莱-霍金斯法案）中规定了这一点，该法案“将价格稳定和充分就业确立为国家经济政策目标”。本质上，这意味着努力确保尽可能多的人有工作，并防止过度的通货膨胀（或通货紧缩）。）第三个关键目标是提供适度的长期利率。</blockquote></p><p> To accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这些目标，美联储利用了两种主要机制。第一种是在经济放缓或放缓时降低利率以提振经济，并提高利率以防止经济过热。自2008年以来，美联储一直将利率保持在最低水平，以帮助脆弱的经济，该经济首先受到大衰退的打击，最近又受到疫情的打击。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.</p><p><blockquote>第二种策略是买卖金融工具和资产，如银行债券，或者所谓的量化宽松（当它买入时）和量化紧缩（当它卖出时）。购买有助于向金融体系注入刺激经济的现金，这也是美联储最近一直在做的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.</p><p><blockquote>联邦金融分析公司(Federal Financial Analytics)管理合伙人、《不平等引擎：美联储和美国财富的未来》一书的作者凯伦·彼得鲁(Karen Petrou)本周在《纽约时报》上发表的观点文章中指出：“美联储从经济中取出的资产作为Q.E.（量化宽松或购买）的一部分，目前为8.1万亿美元，约占国内生产总值的三分之一。”太多了。</blockquote></p><p> It’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥大学布斯商学院金融学副教授迈克尔·韦伯认为，这里值得注意的是，低利率和提振经济确实有助于有色人种、受教育程度较低的女性和其他不太富裕的群体。只是让已经有优势的人受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> “Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”</p><p><blockquote>“收入较高和较富裕的人持有股票，尤其是受过大学教育的美国白人，”韦伯说。“他们从宽松的货币政策中受益更多。如果你把这些碎片放在一起，你确实会在数据中看到宽松的货币政策往往会增加收入和财富不平等。”</blockquote></p><p> Many economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家对涓滴经济学的想法嗤之以鼻，但从某种意义上说，这才是美联储政策的真正含义。它把钱交到银行和富人手中，然后希望他们用这些钱通过扩大业务、雇佣工人和给他们加薪来提振经济。但你猜怎么着？银行和富人在这方面做得还不够。我怎么知道？很简单：因为财富不平等不断加剧。</blockquote></p><p> To be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.</p><p><blockquote>公平地说，这里的大部分责任和责任在于国会，它可以利用其财政政策工具（如税收政策、所得税抵免，甚至像全民基本收入这样的计划——每个公民都会收到一张政府支票。）美联储也在使用其掌握的工具。此外，美联储当然不想加剧财富不平等。然而这正是它一直在做的事情。这让我想起了精神错乱的旧定义，一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，却期待不同的结果。</blockquote></p><p> The notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”</p><p><blockquote>不平等与美联储行动相关的概念越来越引人注目。一年前，时任总统候选人乔·拜登提议国会修改《美联储法案》，以“增加这一责任，并积极针对就业、工资和财富方面持续存在的种族差距”。</blockquote></p><p> 'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'</p><p><blockquote>“我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣”</blockquote></p><p> The Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.</p><p><blockquote>美联储自己似乎也意识到需要改变。2020年8月，它发布了一个新的战略框架，表明它将寻找更好的方法来衡量成功的议程，其中将包括所有惠及所有美国人的计划。美联储主席杰伊·鲍威尔表示，这意味着它将更密切地关注不同性别和种族群体的就业情况。</blockquote></p><p> Last October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)</p><p><blockquote>去年10月，旧金山联邦储备银行首席执行官玛丽·戴利发表了题为“美联储是否加剧了经济不平等？”的演讲（顺便说一句，她没有直接回答。）然而，戴利确实承认美联储需要采取更多行动，并指出“当许多人仍处于经济观望状态时，我们不会拿走潘趣酒碗。”（这是指前美联储主席威廉·麦克切斯尼·马丁（William McChesney Martin），他在1955年基本上表示，美联储的工作是在派对开始时拿走潘趣酒碗。这意味着美联储应该尽早加息，以防止经济复苏过热。）</blockquote></p><p> Daly went on to say:</p><p><blockquote>戴利接着说：</blockquote></p><p>   <i>“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.</i>    <i>The ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”</i>  Again, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.</p><p><blockquote><i>“但我们新框架最关键的方面不是关于具体政策。相反，这是关于承诺。承诺定期审查我们的战略，以确保它继续满足美国人民的需求。</i><i>这一正在进行的审查的内容很简单。我们需要倾听、研究和参与。对我们所听到的保持开放的心态，为我们发现的问题带来最好的数据和分析，并围绕阻碍我们充分发挥经济潜力的问题进行艰难的、以行动为导向的对话。”</i>同样，在细节和行动要点上有点欠缺，但足够公平。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd858593f64461e93e08798e95aa414c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)</p><p><blockquote>加利福尼亚州旧金山-1月10日：旧金山联邦储备银行行长玛丽·戴利(Mary Daly)合影留念。（尼克·奥托为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Fed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔本人最近也承认需要解决财富不平等问题：“越来越多的人认识到，实际上是在整个政治领域，我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣，”《纽约时报》指出，鲍威尔上个月对国会表示。但他表示，不能指望美联储独自实现这一目标，国会需要制定“一套更广泛的政策”。</blockquote></p><p> There seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)</p><p><blockquote>媒体队伍中似乎也传来了更响亮的鼓声。除了彼得鲁的《泰晤士报》文章之外，Frontline本周还发布了“美联储的力量”，质疑为什么股市参与者等。当美联储“继续每天向金融体系注入数十亿美元……”时，他们会受益匪浅（观看预告片，听听威尔·莱曼的旁白。我喜欢他的声音。）</blockquote></p><p> OK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，那么美联储实际上应该做什么呢？一些与美联储关系密切的人，如彼得森国际经济研究所高级研究员、美联储国内经济部前主任、过去三任美联储主席（杰罗姆·鲍威尔、珍妮特·耶伦和本·伯南克）的高级顾问大卫·威尔科克斯（David Wilcox），并没有说出比它已经做的更多的事情。</blockquote></p><p> “Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"</p><p><blockquote>威尔科克斯说：“经济不平等是一个严重的问题，几十年来一直朝着错误的方向发展。”“我认为这是应该解决的问题。这需要政府采取有针对性的政策行动来解决。但所有这些在很大程度上超出了美联储的能力范围。”</blockquote></p><p> “The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”</p><p><blockquote>“美联储为促进经济平等所能做的最好的事情就是尽最大努力确保每个想要工作的人都能找到工作，并且价格以缓慢、稳定和可预测的速度上涨。唯一比美联储做好工作更糟糕的事情就是美联储不做好工作。我认为美联储不应该被赋予更广泛的权力。”</blockquote></p><p> And what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?</p><p><blockquote>我们问威尔科克斯，为了明确美联储的政策，针对美国特定地区或财富较少的群体与财富较多的群体采用不同利率的想法又如何呢？</blockquote></p><p> “I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”</p><p><blockquote>“我不会相信这个问题的前提，”他回答道。“首先，设计一个真正达到预期效果的制度是极其困难的。你所说的那些政策工具必须由民选代表来运用。如果国会无法有意义地解决这些问题，对我来说，这是一个强烈的信号，表明在如何最好地解决这些问题上没有达成政治共识。”</blockquote></p><p> I’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?</p><p><blockquote>我不确定我是否同意最后一点。考虑所有国会无法达成共识的事情。政府的另一个部门，无论是独立的还是其他的——行政部门、司法部门或美联储——有什么理由不采取行动来解决紧迫的需求吗？</blockquote></p><p> Petrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，彼得鲁设想美联储对改变其政策更加开放。首先，她认为美联储没有正确解释自己的使命。“如果你阅读法律，你会发现第一项任务在充分就业和最大就业之间有所不同，但被描述为每个想要工作的人的工作，这意味着关注劳动参与率，而不仅仅是名义上的失业数字，”她说。这意味着彼得鲁认为美联储在就业方面应该坚持更高的标准。Petrou进一步表示，当谈到利率时，第三项指令涉及适度利率。“接近于零的利率绝不是温和的，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> So then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”</p><p><blockquote>那么，彼得罗女士，美联储应该怎么做呢？首先，像威尔科克斯一样，她不相信用特定的利率瞄准特定的群体。“这在结构上是不可能的，从政策角度来看也是不可取的，”她说。“美联储挑选赢家和输家越少越好。他们不是民选的，不负责任，他们应该坚持自己的使命，让这个使命在宏观经济中的比例尽可能小。”</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Petrou在一定程度上是规定性的。“首先，美联储犯了一系列令人震惊的分析错误，”她说。例如，“它显示家庭收入增加是因为更多的人工作时间延长，但不是因为工资上涨。另一个解决办法是逐步但显著地减少美联储的投资组合。所以它不再拥有市场；市场拥有自己。”</blockquote></p><p> “Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"</p><p><blockquote>“另一个解决办法是，美联储没有在市场下方提供铁的安全网，并允许债券和其他市场自我纠正，因此市场纪律又回来了。美联储为资产价格泡沫设置了市场——这非常危险，需要后退一步。”</blockquote></p><p> “Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”</p><p><blockquote>“这些修复都是非常可行的，”她说。“我认为这除了可能会稍微放缓或市场调整之外不会导致任何结果。坦率地说，还有什么选择？就像吸毒者一样，这很痛，但你该怎么办，继续服用？你必须停下来。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Tough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?</p><p><blockquote>确实是很难的药。问题是，这种退出只会伤害富人和投机者，还是也会伤害那些处于经济阶梯下层的人？</blockquote></p><p> Certainly that is unclear.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这还不清楚。</blockquote></p><p> What if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储、财政部长（前美联储主席）珍妮特·耶伦（Janet Yellen）和国会两党领导人就联邦政府应如何解决不平等问题召开峰会，会怎么样？我觉得会很棒。不幸的是，我也认为这是一个白日梦。</blockquote></p><p> Getting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer &amp; Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.</p><p><blockquote>不过，回到美联储，这是一个非凡的机构，充满了聪明的人，他们可以围着这位豌豆脑作家打转。然而，就像任何有100年历史的实体一样，它可能会陷入困境。想想美联储对我们经济生产率增长缓慢的看法。我记得听到前美联储副主席斯坦利·费舍尔坚持认为，技术和手机并没有真正提高生产率。费舍尔表示，美联储在数据中找不到笔记本电脑或手机使用带来的任何显着收益。（这让我讽刺地怀疑费舍尔公司是否曾经使用过这些物品。）然而，真正的问题是，如果你看不到你测量某样东西的方式的影响，而很明显有影响，也许你的测量方法有缺陷或有缺陷，是时候改变你做事的方式了。</blockquote></p><p> Ditto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.</p><p><blockquote>美联储改变解决不平等问题的方式也是如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">finance.yahoo</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 07:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.</p><p><blockquote>1913年对美国来说是重要的一年。10月7日，亨利·福特在密歇根州高地公园推出了世界上第一条移动汽车装配线。两个月后，12月23日，国会通过了《美联储法案》，创建了我们国家的中央银行。</blockquote></p><p> The evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.</p><p><blockquote>过去108年来，从福特T型车到特斯拉的Model X，汽车的发展令人惊叹。美联储的进步，好吧，我们只能说慢了。慢多了。</blockquote></p><p> Which brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了我的观点：是的，美联储极大地帮助了我们的经济福祉（通过缓冲我们甚至帮助我们避免经济灾难），是的，它在几十年来扩大了影响力（特别是在20世纪30年代和2008/2009年大衰退之后），但它在引导经济方面的主要工作方式保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> I would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.</p><p><blockquote>我认为这些政策现在已经过时，甚至可能是有害的。是的，美联储的工作总是有一些负面影响，但现在——这是问题的关键——由于美联储最近采取了戏剧性和前所未有的举措，附带损害可能接近超过这些举措本身的好处。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，美联储通过保持低利率来提振经济，不成比例地帮助了富人，从而实际上使那些有需要的人处于不利地位。准确地说，对冲基金类型、公司高管、技术精英等变得越来越富有，而劳动人民、只有高中学历的人、有色人种越来越落后。这不是社会主义者的咩咩叫。这些都是事实，美联储是其中的一方。因此，美联储需要一个唤醒看涨期权，或者也许重置是更好的说法。</blockquote></p><p> I generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.</p><p><blockquote>我通常讨厌抨击美联储。整个家庭手工业大多是阴谋论者，他们哀叹美联储要么行动太早或太晚或太多或太少，要么与三边委员会合谋接管世界。我注意了这一点，并建议你也这样做。</blockquote></p><p> What I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.</p><p><blockquote>不过，我所说的与轻率的事情无关，而是涉及一个复杂的、备受推崇的机构，它已经被锁定在政策中，尽管这些政策是善意的，但现在正在产生可以被解释为对我们的社会和经济有害的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Before I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.</p><p><blockquote>在我进入细节之前，让我们首先明确一下美联储是什么。首先，美联储是一个庞大而复杂的系统（《华盛顿邮报》评级称，这是一个“混乱的系统”），“全国各地有十几家储备银行，加上20个较小的分支机构……以及大约20,000名员工和价值23亿美元的房地产。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.</p><p><blockquote>美联储表示，它“为国家提供安全、灵活和稳定的货币和金融体系”。为了履行这一职责，中央银行履行多种职能，包括监管银行、结算银行等金融机构之间的支付以及促进消费者保护。但当涉及到实际引导经济时，央行会受到所谓的美联储使命的影响，即就业和稳定物价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f77ed796f6c2d18bfa7317337191de5c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">FILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More</p><p><blockquote>文件-在这张2021年5月4日的文件照片中，是华盛顿的美联储。美联储最新的全国商业调查发现，尽管供应链瓶颈导致价格上涨，但经济在5月底和6月初进一步走强。美联储于2021年7月14日星期三表示，其12个地区银行区中有7个报告价格强劲上涨，其他5个报告价格温和上涨。（美联社照片/Patrick Semansky，档案）更多</blockquote></p><p> Congress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>国会在1978年《充分就业和平衡增长法案》（汉弗莱-霍金斯法案）中规定了这一点，该法案“将价格稳定和充分就业确立为国家经济政策目标”。本质上，这意味着努力确保尽可能多的人有工作，并防止过度的通货膨胀（或通货紧缩）。）第三个关键目标是提供适度的长期利率。</blockquote></p><p> To accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这些目标，美联储利用了两种主要机制。第一种是在经济放缓或放缓时降低利率以提振经济，并提高利率以防止经济过热。自2008年以来，美联储一直将利率保持在最低水平，以帮助脆弱的经济，该经济首先受到大衰退的打击，最近又受到疫情的打击。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.</p><p><blockquote>第二种策略是买卖金融工具和资产，如银行债券，或者所谓的量化宽松（当它买入时）和量化紧缩（当它卖出时）。购买有助于向金融体系注入刺激经济的现金，这也是美联储最近一直在做的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.</p><p><blockquote>联邦金融分析公司(Federal Financial Analytics)管理合伙人、《不平等引擎：美联储和美国财富的未来》一书的作者凯伦·彼得鲁(Karen Petrou)本周在《纽约时报》上发表的观点文章中指出：“美联储从经济中取出的资产作为Q.E.（量化宽松或购买）的一部分，目前为8.1万亿美元，约占国内生产总值的三分之一。”太多了。</blockquote></p><p> It’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥大学布斯商学院金融学副教授迈克尔·韦伯认为，这里值得注意的是，低利率和提振经济确实有助于有色人种、受教育程度较低的女性和其他不太富裕的群体。只是让已经有优势的人受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> “Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”</p><p><blockquote>“收入较高和较富裕的人持有股票，尤其是受过大学教育的美国白人，”韦伯说。“他们从宽松的货币政策中受益更多。如果你把这些碎片放在一起，你确实会在数据中看到宽松的货币政策往往会增加收入和财富不平等。”</blockquote></p><p> Many economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家对涓滴经济学的想法嗤之以鼻，但从某种意义上说，这才是美联储政策的真正含义。它把钱交到银行和富人手中，然后希望他们用这些钱通过扩大业务、雇佣工人和给他们加薪来提振经济。但你猜怎么着？银行和富人在这方面做得还不够。我怎么知道？很简单：因为财富不平等不断加剧。</blockquote></p><p> To be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.</p><p><blockquote>公平地说，这里的大部分责任和责任在于国会，它可以利用其财政政策工具（如税收政策、所得税抵免，甚至像全民基本收入这样的计划——每个公民都会收到一张政府支票。）美联储也在使用其掌握的工具。此外，美联储当然不想加剧财富不平等。然而这正是它一直在做的事情。这让我想起了精神错乱的旧定义，一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，却期待不同的结果。</blockquote></p><p> The notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”</p><p><blockquote>不平等与美联储行动相关的概念越来越引人注目。一年前，时任总统候选人乔·拜登提议国会修改《美联储法案》，以“增加这一责任，并积极针对就业、工资和财富方面持续存在的种族差距”。</blockquote></p><p> 'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'</p><p><blockquote>“我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣”</blockquote></p><p> The Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.</p><p><blockquote>美联储自己似乎也意识到需要改变。2020年8月，它发布了一个新的战略框架，表明它将寻找更好的方法来衡量成功的议程，其中将包括所有惠及所有美国人的计划。美联储主席杰伊·鲍威尔表示，这意味着它将更密切地关注不同性别和种族群体的就业情况。</blockquote></p><p> Last October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)</p><p><blockquote>去年10月，旧金山联邦储备银行首席执行官玛丽·戴利发表了题为“美联储是否加剧了经济不平等？”的演讲（顺便说一句，她没有直接回答。）然而，戴利确实承认美联储需要采取更多行动，并指出“当许多人仍处于经济观望状态时，我们不会拿走潘趣酒碗。”（这是指前美联储主席威廉·麦克切斯尼·马丁（William McChesney Martin），他在1955年基本上表示，美联储的工作是在派对开始时拿走潘趣酒碗。这意味着美联储应该尽早加息，以防止经济复苏过热。）</blockquote></p><p> Daly went on to say:</p><p><blockquote>戴利接着说：</blockquote></p><p>   <i>“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.</i>    <i>The ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”</i>  Again, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.</p><p><blockquote><i>“但我们新框架最关键的方面不是关于具体政策。相反，这是关于承诺。承诺定期审查我们的战略，以确保它继续满足美国人民的需求。</i><i>这一正在进行的审查的内容很简单。我们需要倾听、研究和参与。对我们所听到的保持开放的心态，为我们发现的问题带来最好的数据和分析，并围绕阻碍我们充分发挥经济潜力的问题进行艰难的、以行动为导向的对话。”</i>同样，在细节和行动要点上有点欠缺，但足够公平。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd858593f64461e93e08798e95aa414c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)</p><p><blockquote>加利福尼亚州旧金山-1月10日：旧金山联邦储备银行行长玛丽·戴利(Mary Daly)合影留念。（尼克·奥托为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Fed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔本人最近也承认需要解决财富不平等问题：“越来越多的人认识到，实际上是在整个政治领域，我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣，”《纽约时报》指出，鲍威尔上个月对国会表示。但他表示，不能指望美联储独自实现这一目标，国会需要制定“一套更广泛的政策”。</blockquote></p><p> There seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)</p><p><blockquote>媒体队伍中似乎也传来了更响亮的鼓声。除了彼得鲁的《泰晤士报》文章之外，Frontline本周还发布了“美联储的力量”，质疑为什么股市参与者等。当美联储“继续每天向金融体系注入数十亿美元……”时，他们会受益匪浅（观看预告片，听听威尔·莱曼的旁白。我喜欢他的声音。）</blockquote></p><p> OK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，那么美联储实际上应该做什么呢？一些与美联储关系密切的人，如彼得森国际经济研究所高级研究员、美联储国内经济部前主任、过去三任美联储主席（杰罗姆·鲍威尔、珍妮特·耶伦和本·伯南克）的高级顾问大卫·威尔科克斯（David Wilcox），并没有说出比它已经做的更多的事情。</blockquote></p><p> “Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"</p><p><blockquote>威尔科克斯说：“经济不平等是一个严重的问题，几十年来一直朝着错误的方向发展。”“我认为这是应该解决的问题。这需要政府采取有针对性的政策行动来解决。但所有这些在很大程度上超出了美联储的能力范围。”</blockquote></p><p> “The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”</p><p><blockquote>“美联储为促进经济平等所能做的最好的事情就是尽最大努力确保每个想要工作的人都能找到工作，并且价格以缓慢、稳定和可预测的速度上涨。唯一比美联储做好工作更糟糕的事情就是美联储不做好工作。我认为美联储不应该被赋予更广泛的权力。”</blockquote></p><p> And what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?</p><p><blockquote>我们问威尔科克斯，为了明确美联储的政策，针对美国特定地区或财富较少的群体与财富较多的群体采用不同利率的想法又如何呢？</blockquote></p><p> “I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”</p><p><blockquote>“我不会相信这个问题的前提，”他回答道。“首先，设计一个真正达到预期效果的制度是极其困难的。你所说的那些政策工具必须由民选代表来运用。如果国会无法有意义地解决这些问题，对我来说，这是一个强烈的信号，表明在如何最好地解决这些问题上没有达成政治共识。”</blockquote></p><p> I’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?</p><p><blockquote>我不确定我是否同意最后一点。考虑所有国会无法达成共识的事情。政府的另一个部门，无论是独立的还是其他的——行政部门、司法部门或美联储——有什么理由不采取行动来解决紧迫的需求吗？</blockquote></p><p> Petrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，彼得鲁设想美联储对改变其政策更加开放。首先，她认为美联储没有正确解释自己的使命。“如果你阅读法律，你会发现第一项任务在充分就业和最大就业之间有所不同，但被描述为每个想要工作的人的工作，这意味着关注劳动参与率，而不仅仅是名义上的失业数字，”她说。这意味着彼得鲁认为美联储在就业方面应该坚持更高的标准。Petrou进一步表示，当谈到利率时，第三项指令涉及适度利率。“接近于零的利率绝不是温和的，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> So then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”</p><p><blockquote>那么，彼得罗女士，美联储应该怎么做呢？首先，像威尔科克斯一样，她不相信用特定的利率瞄准特定的群体。“这在结构上是不可能的，从政策角度来看也是不可取的，”她说。“美联储挑选赢家和输家越少越好。他们不是民选的，不负责任，他们应该坚持自己的使命，让这个使命在宏观经济中的比例尽可能小。”</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Petrou在一定程度上是规定性的。“首先，美联储犯了一系列令人震惊的分析错误，”她说。例如，“它显示家庭收入增加是因为更多的人工作时间延长，但不是因为工资上涨。另一个解决办法是逐步但显著地减少美联储的投资组合。所以它不再拥有市场；市场拥有自己。”</blockquote></p><p> “Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"</p><p><blockquote>“另一个解决办法是，美联储没有在市场下方提供铁的安全网，并允许债券和其他市场自我纠正，因此市场纪律又回来了。美联储为资产价格泡沫设置了市场——这非常危险，需要后退一步。”</blockquote></p><p> “Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”</p><p><blockquote>“这些修复都是非常可行的，”她说。“我认为这除了可能会稍微放缓或市场调整之外不会导致任何结果。坦率地说，还有什么选择？就像吸毒者一样，这很痛，但你该怎么办，继续服用？你必须停下来。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Tough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?</p><p><blockquote>确实是很难的药。问题是，这种退出只会伤害富人和投机者，还是也会伤害那些处于经济阶梯下层的人？</blockquote></p><p> Certainly that is unclear.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这还不清楚。</blockquote></p><p> What if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储、财政部长（前美联储主席）珍妮特·耶伦（Janet Yellen）和国会两党领导人就联邦政府应如何解决不平等问题召开峰会，会怎么样？我觉得会很棒。不幸的是，我也认为这是一个白日梦。</blockquote></p><p> Getting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer &amp; Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.</p><p><blockquote>不过，回到美联储，这是一个非凡的机构，充满了聪明的人，他们可以围着这位豌豆脑作家打转。然而，就像任何有100年历史的实体一样，它可能会陷入困境。想想美联储对我们经济生产率增长缓慢的看法。我记得听到前美联储副主席斯坦利·费舍尔坚持认为，技术和手机并没有真正提高生产率。费舍尔表示，美联储在数据中找不到笔记本电脑或手机使用带来的任何显着收益。（这让我讽刺地怀疑费舍尔公司是否曾经使用过这些物品。）然而，真正的问题是，如果你看不到你测量某样东西的方式的影响，而很明显有影响，也许你的测量方法有缺陷或有缺陷，是时候改变你做事的方式了。</blockquote></p><p> Ditto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.</p><p><blockquote>美联储改变解决不平等问题的方式也是如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-the-federal-reserve-can-really-help-america-100301361.html\">finance.yahoo</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-the-federal-reserve-can-really-help-america-100301361.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123760994","content_text":"1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.\nThe evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.\nWhich brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.\nI would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.\nSpecifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.\nI generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.\nWhat I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.\nBefore I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.\nThe Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.\nFILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More\nCongress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.\nTo accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.\nThe second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.\nKaren Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.\nIt’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.\n“Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”\nMany economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.\nTo be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.\nThe notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”\n'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'\nThe Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.\nLast October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)\nDaly went on to say:\n\n“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.\n\n\nThe ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”\n\nAgain, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.\nSAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)\nFed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”\nThere seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)\nOK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.\n“Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"\n“The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”\nAnd what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?\n“I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”\nI’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?\nPetrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.\nSo then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”\nHaving said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"\n“Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"\n“Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”\nTough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?\nCertainly that is unclear.\nWhat if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.\nGetting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer & Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.\nDitto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179771309,"gmtCreate":1626581191901,"gmtModify":1631885865565,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179771309","repostId":"2152968147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":910,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170531304,"gmtCreate":1626441593108,"gmtModify":1631887313603,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170531304","repostId":"1166259454","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170533971,"gmtCreate":1626441519993,"gmtModify":1631885865581,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170533971","repostId":"1130848269","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":867,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140041881,"gmtCreate":1625621104343,"gmtModify":1631885865508,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great info","listText":"Great info","text":"Great info","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140041881","repostId":"1122166072","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140040964,"gmtCreate":1625621013958,"gmtModify":1631885865403,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3586338902882279","idStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140040964","repostId":"1172293714","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":935,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":140058854,"gmtCreate":1625620812778,"gmtModify":1631885865378,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140058854","repostId":"1122166072","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":633,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833767889,"gmtCreate":1629265025441,"gmtModify":1631885865390,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/833767889","repostId":"1114320591","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114320591","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629255336,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1114320591?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-18 10:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114320591","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The best investors in the world swear by holding high-quality companies for decades on end. These stocks fit that bill.","content":"<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Time plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.</li>  <li>These three business titans are leaders in their fields.</li>  <li>They are also built to last for a very long time.</li> </ul> </p><p><blockquote><ul><li>时间加上耐心，就能在股市中积累财富。</li><li>这三个商业巨头都是各自领域的领导者。</li><li>它们也可以持续很长时间。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> I'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我即将向您展示我最喜欢的股票。有时我投资时着眼于未来几年的丰厚回报。我预计这些产品将在未来几年甚至几十年内继续跑赢市场。要把它们从我的投资组合中撬出来需要很大的努力。</blockquote></p><p> Let me show you why I intend to hold&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>(NASDAQ:NFLX),<b>Alphabet</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and&nbsp;<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.</p><p><blockquote>让我告诉你为什么我打算持有<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），<b>Alphabet</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL），以及<b>迪斯尼</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）长期来看。这些股票可能不是每个投资者都能永远持有的股票，但你绝对应该仔细看看这些顶级投资。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Netflix</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.奈飞</b></blockquote></p><p> First, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in&nbsp;2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>首先，你知道网飞是红色邮购DVD租赁的发送者。该公司于2007年将数字视频流作为DVD客户的免费附加服务推出，然后于2011年将流媒体业务分离为单独的订阅服务。Qwikster事件是一个巨大的营销混乱，当然可以处理得更好，但从长远来看，这绝对是正确的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Going all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:</p><p><blockquote>全力投入全数字流媒体服务使Netflix能够在全球范围内推出付费订阅计划，并辅以对原创内容的雄心勃勃的关注。用户数量从2011年夏天的2600万飙升至今天的2.09亿。这种奇妙的趋势为公司的营收和利润创造了奇迹：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/646be4c2a73d68810e962c19efe82476\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>NFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的NFLX收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Netflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix看到了引领收费进入一个全新市场的机会，与DVD邮寄业务相比，该市场的基础设施成本较低，并且具有巨大的全球增长潜力。因此，在美国视频租赁行业占据主导地位的DVD业务被毫不客气地抛到了一边，取而代之的是更好的想法。</blockquote></p><p> These days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.</p><p><blockquote>如今，网飞是一家屡获殊荣的内容生产商，在每个重要市场都拥有无与伦比的分销网络（中国除外，该公司必须通过当地合作伙伴运营）。自Qwikster事件以来，该股的回报率为2,240%，复合年增长率(CAGR)为35.8%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Alphabet</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.Alphabet</b></blockquote></p><p> Alphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet是在线服务巨头谷歌的母公司。最初是斯坦福大学的一个学生项目，很快发展成为世界领先的在线搜索工具。再加上谷歌数字广告工具的赚钱能力，该公司在早期就产生了强劲的现金流。现金利润被再投资于更多的商业想法。谷歌最终在网络浏览器、在线视频、电子邮件和智能手机软件等重要领域建立或购买了拥有无与伦比市场份额的服务。</blockquote></p><p> By 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.</p><p><blockquote>到2015年，联合创始人谢尔盖·布林（Sergey Brin）和拉里·佩奇（Larry Page）得出结论，谷歌的主要搜索和广告业务最终必须逐渐消失，被移动替代品和其他创新所取代。所以公司做了一些大的改变。谷歌聘请了首席财务官露丝·波拉特(Ruth Porat)，她是一位在大型企业融资方面拥有数十年经验的银行业高管。同年晚些时候，该公司更名为Alphabet，并重组为一个由不同业务组成的松散企业集团。</blockquote></p><p> Google is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.</p><p><blockquote>谷歌仍是Alphabet的中坚力量，2020年占控股公司总销售额的99.6%。尽管在自动驾驶汽车和光纤互联网连接领域取得了一些进展，但非谷歌业务仍在定期亏损。与此同时，该公司正在为不确定的未来做准备，开发大量具有巨大长期增长前景和同样大的发展风险的线上和线下业务项目。</blockquote></p><p> If the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.</p><p><blockquote>如果自动驾驶汽车从长远来看行不通，Alphabet可能会在医学研究或新型风能发电机中找到提款机。我们甚至可能从未听说过Alphabet庞大投资组合中的下一个大赢家。如果Alphabet开始从人工智能工具或抗癌药物中赚大钱，大多数消费者可能根本不会认为这些东西是谷歌的业务。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb97b6814df65240bd8f0b4a0690e77e\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>GOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的GOOGL收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Alphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet将继续利用其谷歌传统，但当基于浏览器的搜索和广告业务开始动摇时，也不乏完全不相关的业务可以接管。在此之前，传统搜索业务正在蓬勃发展，Alphabet在10年内回报了投资者912%的回报。年增长率为23.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.华特迪士尼</b></blockquote></p><p> And then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.</p><p><blockquote>然后是近百年的娱乐巨头。老鼠之家是由两个有远见的卡通制作兄弟于1923年创建的。该公司经历了一次世界大战、几次严重的经济衰退、10年来分销和生产技术的进步等等。</blockquote></p><p> The leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.</p><p><blockquote>你今天看到的休闲和娱乐集团与最初的业务相去甚远，最初的业务是一个纯粹的卡通制作工作室。迪士尼世界和迪士尼乐园是文化的试金石。该公司是酒店和度假村服务的领先提供商，包括邮轮公司。我想不出还有哪家公司能像迪士尼一样有效地掌握知识产权货币化的艺术。知识产权——大多数美国人烂熟于心的角色、虚构世界和故事情节——将永远是迪士尼业务的命脉。</blockquote></p><p> Times are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.</p><p><blockquote>现在的日子很艰难，因为冠状病毒大流行关闭了世界各地的电影院、主题公园、度假村和游轮。因此，迪士尼认真审视了娱乐业的剧烈变化，并决定全力支持流媒体平台。</blockquote></p><p> The company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.</p><p><blockquote>该公司已经自上而下进行了重组，以支持迪士尼的流媒体平台。Disney+、Hulu、Hotstar和ESPN+流媒体服务准备在全球媒体流媒体市场挑战网飞，2021年第三季度用户总数达到1.74亿。迪士尼在健康危机最黑暗的日子里承担了一些额外的债务，并且很可能会使用部分闲钱来加速其流媒体业务。</blockquote></p><p> The coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.</p><p><blockquote>冠状病毒让迪士尼措手不及，但管理层毫不犹豫地立即采取行动。整个庞然大物现在正朝着不同的方向前进，得到了让公司走到这一步的同样的讲故事资产宝库的支持。从长远来看，这家管理极其良好的公司也跑赢了市场，10年涨幅为439%，复合年增长率为13%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/110cd288830d0e354767349fe36259e6\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The common denominator</b></p><p><blockquote><b>共同点</b></blockquote></p><p> These three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司非常不同，但它们仍然有一个非常重要的共同点。我在寻找面对顺境和逆境的灵活性。如果你的公司准备在周围的商业环境发生变化时对其运营计划进行重大改变，你知道你有一个经得起时间考验的组织。</blockquote></p><p> Lots of&nbsp;time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.</p><p><blockquote>大量的市场时间等于财富积累的回报。这是你可以从本杰明·格雷厄姆的著作和他的明星学生沃伦·巴菲特的出色成绩中学到的主要教训。积累改变生活的财富并不需要几年的惊人回报。你所需要的只是几十年的稳定收益。</blockquote></p><p> For example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with&nbsp;the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.</p><p><blockquote>例如，10%的年回报率（与长期市场平均水平一致）相当于20年内673%的利润。在这个漫长的时间尺度上，以微弱优势击败街道会产生很大的影响。将您的平均收益提高到11%，您将在这20年内看到806%的回报。更大的增长会带来更大的长期总回报。上面讨论的三只股票的表现比这更好，从长远来看，它们的生存几乎是由市场条件需要时做出改变的意愿来保证的。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks I'm Never Selling<blockquote>我永远不会出售的3只股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Motley Fool</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-18 10:55</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Key Points</b></p><p><blockquote><b>要点</b></blockquote></p><p> <ul>  <li>Time plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.</li>  <li>These three business titans are leaders in their fields.</li>  <li>They are also built to last for a very long time.</li> </ul> </p><p><blockquote><ul><li>时间加上耐心，就能在股市中积累财富。</li><li>这三个商业巨头都是各自领域的领导者。</li><li>它们也可以持续很长时间。</li></ul></blockquote></p><p> I'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.</p><p><blockquote>我即将向您展示我最喜欢的股票。有时我投资时着眼于未来几年的丰厚回报。我预计这些产品将在未来几年甚至几十年内继续跑赢市场。要把它们从我的投资组合中撬出来需要很大的努力。</blockquote></p><p> Let me show you why I intend to hold&nbsp;<b>Netflix</b>(NASDAQ:NFLX),<b>Alphabet</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and&nbsp;<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.</p><p><blockquote>让我告诉你为什么我打算持有<b>Netflix</b>（纳斯达克：NFLX），<b>Alphabet</b>（纳斯达克：GOOG）（纳斯达克：GOOGL），以及<b>迪斯尼</b>（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）长期来看。这些股票可能不是每个投资者都能永远持有的股票，但你绝对应该仔细看看这些顶级投资。</blockquote></p><p> <b>1. Netflix</b></p><p><blockquote><b>1.奈飞</b></blockquote></p><p> First, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in&nbsp;2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.</p><p><blockquote>首先，你知道网飞是红色邮购DVD租赁的发送者。该公司于2007年将数字视频流作为DVD客户的免费附加服务推出，然后于2011年将流媒体业务分离为单独的订阅服务。Qwikster事件是一个巨大的营销混乱，当然可以处理得更好，但从长远来看，这绝对是正确的想法。</blockquote></p><p> Going all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:</p><p><blockquote>全力投入全数字流媒体服务使Netflix能够在全球范围内推出付费订阅计划，并辅以对原创内容的雄心勃勃的关注。用户数量从2011年夏天的2600万飙升至今天的2.09亿。这种奇妙的趋势为公司的营收和利润创造了奇迹：</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/646be4c2a73d68810e962c19efe82476\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>NFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的NFLX收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> Netflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.</p><p><blockquote>Netflix看到了引领收费进入一个全新市场的机会，与DVD邮寄业务相比，该市场的基础设施成本较低，并且具有巨大的全球增长潜力。因此，在美国视频租赁行业占据主导地位的DVD业务被毫不客气地抛到了一边，取而代之的是更好的想法。</blockquote></p><p> These days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.</p><p><blockquote>如今，网飞是一家屡获殊荣的内容生产商，在每个重要市场都拥有无与伦比的分销网络（中国除外，该公司必须通过当地合作伙伴运营）。自Qwikster事件以来，该股的回报率为2,240%，复合年增长率(CAGR)为35.8%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>2. Alphabet</b></p><p><blockquote><b>2.Alphabet</b></blockquote></p><p> Alphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet是在线服务巨头谷歌的母公司。最初是斯坦福大学的一个学生项目，很快发展成为世界领先的在线搜索工具。再加上谷歌数字广告工具的赚钱能力，该公司在早期就产生了强劲的现金流。现金利润被再投资于更多的商业想法。谷歌最终在网络浏览器、在线视频、电子邮件和智能手机软件等重要领域建立或购买了拥有无与伦比市场份额的服务。</blockquote></p><p> By 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.</p><p><blockquote>到2015年，联合创始人谢尔盖·布林（Sergey Brin）和拉里·佩奇（Larry Page）得出结论，谷歌的主要搜索和广告业务最终必须逐渐消失，被移动替代品和其他创新所取代。所以公司做了一些大的改变。谷歌聘请了首席财务官露丝·波拉特(Ruth Porat)，她是一位在大型企业融资方面拥有数十年经验的银行业高管。同年晚些时候，该公司更名为Alphabet，并重组为一个由不同业务组成的松散企业集团。</blockquote></p><p> Google is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.</p><p><blockquote>谷歌仍是Alphabet的中坚力量，2020年占控股公司总销售额的99.6%。尽管在自动驾驶汽车和光纤互联网连接领域取得了一些进展，但非谷歌业务仍在定期亏损。与此同时，该公司正在为不确定的未来做准备，开发大量具有巨大长期增长前景和同样大的发展风险的线上和线下业务项目。</blockquote></p><p> If the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.</p><p><blockquote>如果自动驾驶汽车从长远来看行不通，Alphabet可能会在医学研究或新型风能发电机中找到提款机。我们甚至可能从未听说过Alphabet庞大投资组合中的下一个大赢家。如果Alphabet开始从人工智能工具或抗癌药物中赚大钱，大多数消费者可能根本不会认为这些东西是谷歌的业务。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb97b6814df65240bd8f0b4a0690e77e\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>GOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>YCHARTS提供的GOOGL收入(TTM)数据。</span></p></blockquote></p><p></p><p> Alphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.</p><p><blockquote>Alphabet将继续利用其谷歌传统，但当基于浏览器的搜索和广告业务开始动摇时，也不乏完全不相关的业务可以接管。在此之前，传统搜索业务正在蓬勃发展，Alphabet在10年内回报了投资者912%的回报。年增长率为23.3%。</blockquote></p><p> <b>3. Walt Disney</b></p><p><blockquote><b>3.华特迪士尼</b></blockquote></p><p> And then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.</p><p><blockquote>然后是近百年的娱乐巨头。老鼠之家是由两个有远见的卡通制作兄弟于1923年创建的。该公司经历了一次世界大战、几次严重的经济衰退、10年来分销和生产技术的进步等等。</blockquote></p><p> The leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.</p><p><blockquote>你今天看到的休闲和娱乐集团与最初的业务相去甚远，最初的业务是一个纯粹的卡通制作工作室。迪士尼世界和迪士尼乐园是文化的试金石。该公司是酒店和度假村服务的领先提供商，包括邮轮公司。我想不出还有哪家公司能像迪士尼一样有效地掌握知识产权货币化的艺术。知识产权——大多数美国人烂熟于心的角色、虚构世界和故事情节——将永远是迪士尼业务的命脉。</blockquote></p><p> Times are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.</p><p><blockquote>现在的日子很艰难，因为冠状病毒大流行关闭了世界各地的电影院、主题公园、度假村和游轮。因此，迪士尼认真审视了娱乐业的剧烈变化，并决定全力支持流媒体平台。</blockquote></p><p> The company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.</p><p><blockquote>该公司已经自上而下进行了重组，以支持迪士尼的流媒体平台。Disney+、Hulu、Hotstar和ESPN+流媒体服务准备在全球媒体流媒体市场挑战网飞，2021年第三季度用户总数达到1.74亿。迪士尼在健康危机最黑暗的日子里承担了一些额外的债务，并且很可能会使用部分闲钱来加速其流媒体业务。</blockquote></p><p> The coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.</p><p><blockquote>冠状病毒让迪士尼措手不及，但管理层毫不犹豫地立即采取行动。整个庞然大物现在正朝着不同的方向前进，得到了让公司走到这一步的同样的讲故事资产宝库的支持。从长远来看，这家管理极其良好的公司也跑赢了市场，10年涨幅为439%，复合年增长率为13%。</blockquote></p><p> <p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/110cd288830d0e354767349fe36259e6\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p><p><blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><span>图片来源：盖蒂图片社。</span></p></blockquote></p><p> <b>The common denominator</b></p><p><blockquote><b>共同点</b></blockquote></p><p> These three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.</p><p><blockquote>这三家公司非常不同，但它们仍然有一个非常重要的共同点。我在寻找面对顺境和逆境的灵活性。如果你的公司准备在周围的商业环境发生变化时对其运营计划进行重大改变，你知道你有一个经得起时间考验的组织。</blockquote></p><p> Lots of&nbsp;time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.</p><p><blockquote>大量的市场时间等于财富积累的回报。这是你可以从本杰明·格雷厄姆的著作和他的明星学生沃伦·巴菲特的出色成绩中学到的主要教训。积累改变生活的财富并不需要几年的惊人回报。你所需要的只是几十年的稳定收益。</blockquote></p><p> For example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with&nbsp;the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.</p><p><blockquote>例如，10%的年回报率（与长期市场平均水平一致）相当于20年内673%的利润。在这个漫长的时间尺度上，以微弱优势击败街道会产生很大的影响。将您的平均收益提高到11%，您将在这20年内看到806%的回报。更大的增长会带来更大的长期总回报。上面讨论的三只股票的表现比这更好，从长远来看，它们的生存几乎是由市场条件需要时做出改变的意愿来保证的。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/17/3-stocks-im-never-selling/\">Motley Fool</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞","DIS":"迪士尼","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/17/3-stocks-im-never-selling/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114320591","content_text":"Key Points\n\nTime plus patience adds up to wealth-building results in the stock market.\nThese three business titans are leaders in their fields.\nThey are also built to last for a very long time.\n\n\nI'm about to show you my favorite stocks. Sometimes I invest with an eye to strong returns over the next few years. These are the ones that I expect to keep beating the market for the years and decades to come. It will take a lot to pry them out of my portfolio.\nLet me show you why I intend to hold Netflix(NASDAQ:NFLX),Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), and Walt Disney(NYSE:DIS)for the long haul. These stocks may not be slam-dunk forever holdings for every investor, but you should absolutely take a close look at these top-notch investments.\n1. Netflix\nFirst, you knew Netflix as the sender of red mail-order DVD rentals. The company introduced digital video streams as a free add-on for DVD customers in 2007, then separated the streaming business into a separate subscription service in 2011. The Qwikster event was a big marketing mess and could certainly have been handled better, but it was absolutely the right idea in the long run.\nGoing all-in on the all-digital streaming service allowed Netflix to roll out its paid subscription plans on a global scale, supplemented by an ambitious focus on original content. The subscriber count has skyrocketed from 26 million in the summer of 2011 to 209 million today. That fantastic trend has worked wonders for the company's top and bottom lines:\nNFLX REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.\nNetflix saw an opportunity to lead the charge into a brand-new market, with low infrastructure costs compared to the DVD-mailing business and buckets of worldwide growth potential. So the DVD business that had come to dominate the video rental sector in America was unceremoniously tossed aside in favor of better ideas.\nThese days, Netflix is an award-winning content producer with an unmatched distribution network in every market that matters (except forChina, where the company must operate through local partnerships). The stock has delivered a 2,240% return since the Qwikster event, which works out to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 35.8%.\n2. Alphabet\nAlphabet is the parent company of online services giant Google. What started as a student project at Stanford quickly evolved into the world's leading online search tool. Paired with the moneymaking muscle of Google's digital advertising tools, the company generated strong cash flows early on. The cash profits were reinvested in more business ideas. Google eventually built or bought services with matchless market shares in important sectors such as web browsers, online video, email, and smartphone software.\nBy 2015, co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page had concluded that Google's meat-and-potatoes search and advertising businesses eventually had to fade away, overtaken by mobile alternatives and other innovations. So the company made some big changes. Google hired CFO Ruth Porat, a banking executive with decades of experience in large-scale corporate finance. Later the same year, the company changed its name to Alphabet and reorganized itself into a loose conglomerate of different operations.\nGoogle is still the backbone of Alphabet, accounting for 99.6% of the holding company's total sales in 2020. The non-Google operations are still losing money on a regular basis, despite some progress in the fields of self-driving vehicles and fiber-optic internet connections. At the same time, the company is preparing for an uncertain future by developing a plethora of online and offline business projects with massive long-term growth prospects and equally large development risks.\nIf the self-driving cars don't work out in the long run, Alphabet might find a cash machine in medical research or novel wind energy generators. We may never even have heard of the next big winner in Alphabet's sprawling portfolio. If and when Alphabet starts to make serious money from artificial intelligence tools or cancer drugs, most consumers probably won't think of that stuff as a Google business at all.\nGOOGL REVENUE (TTM) DATA BY YCHARTS.\nAlphabet continues to ride its Google heritage as far as it will go, but there is no shortage of completely unrelated operations that can take over when the browser-based search and advertising business starts to falter. Until then, the traditional search business is booming and Alphabet has rewarded investors with a 912% return in 10 years. That's an annual growth rate of 23.3%.\n3. Walt Disney\nAnd then there's the near-centennial entertainment giant. The House of Mouse was founded in 1923 by two cartoon-making brothers with a vision. The company has survived a world war, several terrible recessions, 10 decades of progress in distribution and production technologies, and much more.\nThe leisure and entertainment conglomerate you see today is a far cry from the original business, which was a pure-play cartoon production studio. Disney World and Disneyland are cultural touchstones. The company is a leading provider of hotel and resort services, including a cruise line. I can't think of another company that has mastered the art of monetizing its intellectual property as effectively as Disney has. And that intellectual property -- characters, fictional worlds, and storylines that most Americans know by heart -- will always be the lifeblood of Disney's business.\nTimes are tough right now, as the coronavirus pandemic closed down movie theaters, theme parks, resorts, and cruise ships around the world. So Disney took a good, hard look at the drastic changes in the entertainment industry and decided to put its full weight behind media-streaming platforms.\nThe company has been reorganized from the top down to support Disney's streaming platforms. The Disney+, Hulu, Hotstar, and ESPN+ streaming services are poised to challenge Netflix for the global media-streaming market, adding up to 174 million subscribers in the third quarter of 2021. Disney took on some extra debt in the darkest days of the health crisis and will most likely use some of that spare cash to accelerate its streaming operations.\nThe coronavirus caught Disney unprepared, but management didn't hesitate to turn on a dime. The whole behemoth is heading in a different direction now, supported by the same treasure trove of storytelling assets that took the company this far. This supremely well-managed company is also beating the market in the long run, with a 439% 10-year gain that works out to a CAGR of 13%.\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nThe common denominator\nThese three companies are very different, but they still have one all-important quality in common. I'm looking for flexibility in the face of good times and bad. If your company stands ready to make drastic changes to its operating plan when the business environment around it changes, you know you have an organization that will stand the test of time.\nLots of time in the market equals wealth-building returns. That's the main lesson you can learn from the writings of Benjamin Graham and the stellar results of his star student, Warren Buffett. Building life-changing wealth does not require a couple of years of fantastic returns. All you need is generally solid gains for several decades.\nFor example, an annual return of 10% -- in line with the long-term market average-- adds up to a 673% profit over 20 years. Beating the Street by a small margin makes a big difference on this long time scale. Boost your average gains to just 11%, and you'll see 806% returns over those 20 years. Larger increases bring even greater total long-haul returns. The three stocks discussed above are set up to do better than that, and their very survival in the long run is just about guaranteed by that willingness to change when market conditions require it.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"NFLX":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1119,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140040964,"gmtCreate":1625621013958,"gmtModify":1631885865403,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140040964","repostId":"1172293714","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":935,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":168824569,"gmtCreate":1623972099351,"gmtModify":1631885865418,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"GameStop (GME) This stock is&nbsp;volatile but Ihad luck by buying the stock at USD 146 then selling at USD 280 .&nbsp;","listText":"GameStop (GME) This stock is&nbsp;volatile but Ihad luck by buying the stock at USD 146 then selling at USD 280 .&nbsp;","text":"GameStop (GME) This stock is volatile but Ihad luck by buying the stock at USD 146 then selling at USD 280 .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/168824569","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":807,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890126788,"gmtCreate":1628087701344,"gmtModify":1631885865431,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/890126788","repostId":"2156060681","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1964,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173840976,"gmtCreate":1626654502995,"gmtModify":1631885865443,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/173840976","repostId":"1123760994","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123760994","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626652367,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1123760994?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-19 07:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123760994","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car as","content":"<p>1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.</p><p><blockquote>1913年对美国来说是重要的一年。10月7日，亨利·福特在密歇根州高地公园推出了世界上第一条移动汽车装配线。两个月后，12月23日，国会通过了《美联储法案》，创建了我们国家的中央银行。</blockquote></p><p> The evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.</p><p><blockquote>过去108年来，从福特T型车到特斯拉的Model X，汽车的发展令人惊叹。美联储的进步，好吧，我们只能说慢了。慢多了。</blockquote></p><p> Which brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了我的观点：是的，美联储极大地帮助了我们的经济福祉（通过缓冲我们甚至帮助我们避免经济灾难），是的，它在几十年来扩大了影响力（特别是在20世纪30年代和2008/2009年大衰退之后），但它在引导经济方面的主要工作方式保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> I would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.</p><p><blockquote>我认为这些政策现在已经过时，甚至可能是有害的。是的，美联储的工作总是有一些负面影响，但现在——这是问题的关键——由于美联储最近采取了戏剧性和前所未有的举措，附带损害可能接近超过这些举措本身的好处。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，美联储通过保持低利率来提振经济，不成比例地帮助了富人，从而实际上使那些有需要的人处于不利地位。准确地说，对冲基金类型、公司高管、技术精英等变得越来越富有，而劳动人民、只有高中学历的人、有色人种越来越落后。这不是社会主义者的咩咩叫。这些都是事实，美联储是其中的一方。因此，美联储需要一个唤醒看涨期权，或者也许重置是更好的说法。</blockquote></p><p> I generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.</p><p><blockquote>我通常讨厌抨击美联储。整个家庭手工业大多是阴谋论者，他们哀叹美联储要么行动太早或太晚或太多或太少，要么与三边委员会合谋接管世界。我注意了这一点，并建议你也这样做。</blockquote></p><p> What I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.</p><p><blockquote>不过，我所说的与轻率的事情无关，而是涉及一个复杂的、备受推崇的机构，它已经被锁定在政策中，尽管这些政策是善意的，但现在正在产生可以被解释为对我们的社会和经济有害的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Before I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.</p><p><blockquote>在我进入细节之前，让我们首先明确一下美联储是什么。首先，美联储是一个庞大而复杂的系统（《华盛顿邮报》评级称，这是一个“混乱的系统”），“全国各地有十几家储备银行，加上20个较小的分支机构……以及大约20,000名员工和价值23亿美元的房地产。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.</p><p><blockquote>美联储表示，它“为国家提供安全、灵活和稳定的货币和金融体系”。为了履行这一职责，中央银行履行多种职能，包括监管银行、结算银行等金融机构之间的支付以及促进消费者保护。但当涉及到实际引导经济时，央行会受到所谓的美联储使命的影响，即就业和稳定物价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f77ed796f6c2d18bfa7317337191de5c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">FILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More</p><p><blockquote>文件-在这张2021年5月4日的文件照片中，是华盛顿的美联储。美联储最新的全国商业调查发现，尽管供应链瓶颈导致价格上涨，但经济在5月底和6月初进一步走强。美联储于2021年7月14日星期三表示，其12个地区银行区中有7个报告价格强劲上涨，其他5个报告价格温和上涨。（美联社照片/Patrick Semansky，档案）更多</blockquote></p><p> Congress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>国会在1978年《充分就业和平衡增长法案》（汉弗莱-霍金斯法案）中规定了这一点，该法案“将价格稳定和充分就业确立为国家经济政策目标”。本质上，这意味着努力确保尽可能多的人有工作，并防止过度的通货膨胀（或通货紧缩）。）第三个关键目标是提供适度的长期利率。</blockquote></p><p> To accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这些目标，美联储利用了两种主要机制。第一种是在经济放缓或放缓时降低利率以提振经济，并提高利率以防止经济过热。自2008年以来，美联储一直将利率保持在最低水平，以帮助脆弱的经济，该经济首先受到大衰退的打击，最近又受到疫情的打击。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.</p><p><blockquote>第二种策略是买卖金融工具和资产，如银行债券，或者所谓的量化宽松（当它买入时）和量化紧缩（当它卖出时）。购买有助于向金融体系注入刺激经济的现金，这也是美联储最近一直在做的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.</p><p><blockquote>联邦金融分析公司(Federal Financial Analytics)管理合伙人、《不平等引擎：美联储和美国财富的未来》一书的作者凯伦·彼得鲁(Karen Petrou)本周在《纽约时报》上发表的观点文章中指出：“美联储从经济中取出的资产作为Q.E.（量化宽松或购买）的一部分，目前为8.1万亿美元，约占国内生产总值的三分之一。”太多了。</blockquote></p><p> It’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥大学布斯商学院金融学副教授迈克尔·韦伯认为，这里值得注意的是，低利率和提振经济确实有助于有色人种、受教育程度较低的女性和其他不太富裕的群体。只是让已经有优势的人受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> “Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”</p><p><blockquote>“收入较高和较富裕的人持有股票，尤其是受过大学教育的美国白人，”韦伯说。“他们从宽松的货币政策中受益更多。如果你把这些碎片放在一起，你确实会在数据中看到宽松的货币政策往往会增加收入和财富不平等。”</blockquote></p><p> Many economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家对涓滴经济学的想法嗤之以鼻，但从某种意义上说，这才是美联储政策的真正含义。它把钱交到银行和富人手中，然后希望他们用这些钱通过扩大业务、雇佣工人和给他们加薪来提振经济。但你猜怎么着？银行和富人在这方面做得还不够。我怎么知道？很简单：因为财富不平等不断加剧。</blockquote></p><p> To be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.</p><p><blockquote>公平地说，这里的大部分责任和责任在于国会，它可以利用其财政政策工具（如税收政策、所得税抵免，甚至像全民基本收入这样的计划——每个公民都会收到一张政府支票。）美联储也在使用其掌握的工具。此外，美联储当然不想加剧财富不平等。然而这正是它一直在做的事情。这让我想起了精神错乱的旧定义，一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，却期待不同的结果。</blockquote></p><p> The notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”</p><p><blockquote>不平等与美联储行动相关的概念越来越引人注目。一年前，时任总统候选人乔·拜登提议国会修改《美联储法案》，以“增加这一责任，并积极针对就业、工资和财富方面持续存在的种族差距”。</blockquote></p><p> 'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'</p><p><blockquote>“我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣”</blockquote></p><p> The Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.</p><p><blockquote>美联储自己似乎也意识到需要改变。2020年8月，它发布了一个新的战略框架，表明它将寻找更好的方法来衡量成功的议程，其中将包括所有惠及所有美国人的计划。美联储主席杰伊·鲍威尔表示，这意味着它将更密切地关注不同性别和种族群体的就业情况。</blockquote></p><p> Last October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)</p><p><blockquote>去年10月，旧金山联邦储备银行首席执行官玛丽·戴利发表了题为“美联储是否加剧了经济不平等？”的演讲（顺便说一句，她没有直接回答。）然而，戴利确实承认美联储需要采取更多行动，并指出“当许多人仍处于经济观望状态时，我们不会拿走潘趣酒碗。”（这是指前美联储主席威廉·麦克切斯尼·马丁（William McChesney Martin），他在1955年基本上表示，美联储的工作是在派对开始时拿走潘趣酒碗。这意味着美联储应该尽早加息，以防止经济复苏过热。）</blockquote></p><p> Daly went on to say:</p><p><blockquote>戴利接着说：</blockquote></p><p>   <i>“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.</i>    <i>The ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”</i>  Again, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.</p><p><blockquote><i>“但我们新框架最关键的方面不是关于具体政策。相反，这是关于承诺。承诺定期审查我们的战略，以确保它继续满足美国人民的需求。</i><i>这一正在进行的审查的内容很简单。我们需要倾听、研究和参与。对我们所听到的保持开放的心态，为我们发现的问题带来最好的数据和分析，并围绕阻碍我们充分发挥经济潜力的问题进行艰难的、以行动为导向的对话。”</i>同样，在细节和行动要点上有点欠缺，但足够公平。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd858593f64461e93e08798e95aa414c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)</p><p><blockquote>加利福尼亚州旧金山-1月10日：旧金山联邦储备银行行长玛丽·戴利(Mary Daly)合影留念。（尼克·奥托为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Fed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔本人最近也承认需要解决财富不平等问题：“越来越多的人认识到，实际上是在整个政治领域，我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣，”《纽约时报》指出，鲍威尔上个月对国会表示。但他表示，不能指望美联储独自实现这一目标，国会需要制定“一套更广泛的政策”。</blockquote></p><p> There seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)</p><p><blockquote>媒体队伍中似乎也传来了更响亮的鼓声。除了彼得鲁的《泰晤士报》文章之外，Frontline本周还发布了“美联储的力量”，质疑为什么股市参与者等。当美联储“继续每天向金融体系注入数十亿美元……”时，他们会受益匪浅（观看预告片，听听威尔·莱曼的旁白。我喜欢他的声音。）</blockquote></p><p> OK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，那么美联储实际上应该做什么呢？一些与美联储关系密切的人，如彼得森国际经济研究所高级研究员、美联储国内经济部前主任、过去三任美联储主席（杰罗姆·鲍威尔、珍妮特·耶伦和本·伯南克）的高级顾问大卫·威尔科克斯（David Wilcox），并没有说出比它已经做的更多的事情。</blockquote></p><p> “Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"</p><p><blockquote>威尔科克斯说：“经济不平等是一个严重的问题，几十年来一直朝着错误的方向发展。”“我认为这是应该解决的问题。这需要政府采取有针对性的政策行动来解决。但所有这些在很大程度上超出了美联储的能力范围。”</blockquote></p><p> “The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”</p><p><blockquote>“美联储为促进经济平等所能做的最好的事情就是尽最大努力确保每个想要工作的人都能找到工作，并且价格以缓慢、稳定和可预测的速度上涨。唯一比美联储做好工作更糟糕的事情就是美联储不做好工作。我认为美联储不应该被赋予更广泛的权力。”</blockquote></p><p> And what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?</p><p><blockquote>我们问威尔科克斯，为了明确美联储的政策，针对美国特定地区或财富较少的群体与财富较多的群体采用不同利率的想法又如何呢？</blockquote></p><p> “I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”</p><p><blockquote>“我不会相信这个问题的前提，”他回答道。“首先，设计一个真正达到预期效果的制度是极其困难的。你所说的那些政策工具必须由民选代表来运用。如果国会无法有意义地解决这些问题，对我来说，这是一个强烈的信号，表明在如何最好地解决这些问题上没有达成政治共识。”</blockquote></p><p> I’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?</p><p><blockquote>我不确定我是否同意最后一点。考虑所有国会无法达成共识的事情。政府的另一个部门，无论是独立的还是其他的——行政部门、司法部门或美联储——有什么理由不采取行动来解决紧迫的需求吗？</blockquote></p><p> Petrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，彼得鲁设想美联储对改变其政策更加开放。首先，她认为美联储没有正确解释自己的使命。“如果你阅读法律，你会发现第一项任务在充分就业和最大就业之间有所不同，但被描述为每个想要工作的人的工作，这意味着关注劳动参与率，而不仅仅是名义上的失业数字，”她说。这意味着彼得鲁认为美联储在就业方面应该坚持更高的标准。Petrou进一步表示，当谈到利率时，第三项指令涉及适度利率。“接近于零的利率绝不是温和的，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> So then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”</p><p><blockquote>那么，彼得罗女士，美联储应该怎么做呢？首先，像威尔科克斯一样，她不相信用特定的利率瞄准特定的群体。“这在结构上是不可能的，从政策角度来看也是不可取的，”她说。“美联储挑选赢家和输家越少越好。他们不是民选的，不负责任，他们应该坚持自己的使命，让这个使命在宏观经济中的比例尽可能小。”</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Petrou在一定程度上是规定性的。“首先，美联储犯了一系列令人震惊的分析错误，”她说。例如，“它显示家庭收入增加是因为更多的人工作时间延长，但不是因为工资上涨。另一个解决办法是逐步但显著地减少美联储的投资组合。所以它不再拥有市场；市场拥有自己。”</blockquote></p><p> “Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"</p><p><blockquote>“另一个解决办法是，美联储没有在市场下方提供铁的安全网，并允许债券和其他市场自我纠正，因此市场纪律又回来了。美联储为资产价格泡沫设置了市场——这非常危险，需要后退一步。”</blockquote></p><p> “Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”</p><p><blockquote>“这些修复都是非常可行的，”她说。“我认为这除了可能会稍微放缓或市场调整之外不会导致任何结果。坦率地说，还有什么选择？就像吸毒者一样，这很痛，但你该怎么办，继续服用？你必须停下来。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Tough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?</p><p><blockquote>确实是很难的药。问题是，这种退出只会伤害富人和投机者，还是也会伤害那些处于经济阶梯下层的人？</blockquote></p><p> Certainly that is unclear.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这还不清楚。</blockquote></p><p> What if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储、财政部长（前美联储主席）珍妮特·耶伦（Janet Yellen）和国会两党领导人就联邦政府应如何解决不平等问题召开峰会，会怎么样？我觉得会很棒。不幸的是，我也认为这是一个白日梦。</blockquote></p><p> Getting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer &amp; Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.</p><p><blockquote>不过，回到美联储，这是一个非凡的机构，充满了聪明的人，他们可以围着这位豌豆脑作家打转。然而，就像任何有100年历史的实体一样，它可能会陷入困境。想想美联储对我们经济生产率增长缓慢的看法。我记得听到前美联储副主席斯坦利·费舍尔坚持认为，技术和手机并没有真正提高生产率。费舍尔表示，美联储在数据中找不到笔记本电脑或手机使用带来的任何显着收益。（这让我讽刺地怀疑费舍尔公司是否曾经使用过这些物品。）然而，真正的问题是，如果你看不到你测量某样东西的方式的影响，而很明显有影响，也许你的测量方法有缺陷或有缺陷，是时候改变你做事的方式了。</blockquote></p><p> Ditto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.</p><p><blockquote>美联储改变解决不平等问题的方式也是如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow the Federal Reserve can really help America<blockquote>美联储如何真正帮助美国</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">finance.yahoo</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-19 07:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.</p><p><blockquote>1913年对美国来说是重要的一年。10月7日，亨利·福特在密歇根州高地公园推出了世界上第一条移动汽车装配线。两个月后，12月23日，国会通过了《美联储法案》，创建了我们国家的中央银行。</blockquote></p><p> The evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.</p><p><blockquote>过去108年来，从福特T型车到特斯拉的Model X，汽车的发展令人惊叹。美联储的进步，好吧，我们只能说慢了。慢多了。</blockquote></p><p> Which brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.</p><p><blockquote>这就引出了我的观点：是的，美联储极大地帮助了我们的经济福祉（通过缓冲我们甚至帮助我们避免经济灾难），是的，它在几十年来扩大了影响力（特别是在20世纪30年代和2008/2009年大衰退之后），但它在引导经济方面的主要工作方式保持不变。</blockquote></p><p> I would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.</p><p><blockquote>我认为这些政策现在已经过时，甚至可能是有害的。是的，美联储的工作总是有一些负面影响，但现在——这是问题的关键——由于美联储最近采取了戏剧性和前所未有的举措，附带损害可能接近超过这些举措本身的好处。</blockquote></p><p> Specifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.</p><p><blockquote>具体来说，美联储通过保持低利率来提振经济，不成比例地帮助了富人，从而实际上使那些有需要的人处于不利地位。准确地说，对冲基金类型、公司高管、技术精英等变得越来越富有，而劳动人民、只有高中学历的人、有色人种越来越落后。这不是社会主义者的咩咩叫。这些都是事实，美联储是其中的一方。因此，美联储需要一个唤醒看涨期权，或者也许重置是更好的说法。</blockquote></p><p> I generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.</p><p><blockquote>我通常讨厌抨击美联储。整个家庭手工业大多是阴谋论者，他们哀叹美联储要么行动太早或太晚或太多或太少，要么与三边委员会合谋接管世界。我注意了这一点，并建议你也这样做。</blockquote></p><p> What I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.</p><p><blockquote>不过，我所说的与轻率的事情无关，而是涉及一个复杂的、备受推崇的机构，它已经被锁定在政策中，尽管这些政策是善意的，但现在正在产生可以被解释为对我们的社会和经济有害的后果。</blockquote></p><p> Before I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.</p><p><blockquote>在我进入细节之前，让我们首先明确一下美联储是什么。首先，美联储是一个庞大而复杂的系统（《华盛顿邮报》评级称，这是一个“混乱的系统”），“全国各地有十几家储备银行，加上20个较小的分支机构……以及大约20,000名员工和价值23亿美元的房地产。</blockquote></p><p> The Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.</p><p><blockquote>美联储表示，它“为国家提供安全、灵活和稳定的货币和金融体系”。为了履行这一职责，中央银行履行多种职能，包括监管银行、结算银行等金融机构之间的支付以及促进消费者保护。但当涉及到实际引导经济时，央行会受到所谓的美联储使命的影响，即就业和稳定物价。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f77ed796f6c2d18bfa7317337191de5c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">FILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More</p><p><blockquote>文件-在这张2021年5月4日的文件照片中，是华盛顿的美联储。美联储最新的全国商业调查发现，尽管供应链瓶颈导致价格上涨，但经济在5月底和6月初进一步走强。美联储于2021年7月14日星期三表示，其12个地区银行区中有7个报告价格强劲上涨，其他5个报告价格温和上涨。（美联社照片/Patrick Semansky，档案）更多</blockquote></p><p> Congress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.</p><p><blockquote>国会在1978年《充分就业和平衡增长法案》（汉弗莱-霍金斯法案）中规定了这一点，该法案“将价格稳定和充分就业确立为国家经济政策目标”。本质上，这意味着努力确保尽可能多的人有工作，并防止过度的通货膨胀（或通货紧缩）。）第三个关键目标是提供适度的长期利率。</blockquote></p><p> To accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.</p><p><blockquote>为了实现这些目标，美联储利用了两种主要机制。第一种是在经济放缓或放缓时降低利率以提振经济，并提高利率以防止经济过热。自2008年以来，美联储一直将利率保持在最低水平，以帮助脆弱的经济，该经济首先受到大衰退的打击，最近又受到疫情的打击。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> The second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.</p><p><blockquote>第二种策略是买卖金融工具和资产，如银行债券，或者所谓的量化宽松（当它买入时）和量化紧缩（当它卖出时）。购买有助于向金融体系注入刺激经济的现金，这也是美联储最近一直在做的事情。</blockquote></p><p> Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.</p><p><blockquote>联邦金融分析公司(Federal Financial Analytics)管理合伙人、《不平等引擎：美联储和美国财富的未来》一书的作者凯伦·彼得鲁(Karen Petrou)本周在《纽约时报》上发表的观点文章中指出：“美联储从经济中取出的资产作为Q.E.（量化宽松或购买）的一部分，目前为8.1万亿美元，约占国内生产总值的三分之一。”太多了。</blockquote></p><p> It’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.</p><p><blockquote>芝加哥大学布斯商学院金融学副教授迈克尔·韦伯认为，这里值得注意的是，低利率和提振经济确实有助于有色人种、受教育程度较低的女性和其他不太富裕的群体。只是让已经有优势的人受益更多。</blockquote></p><p> “Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”</p><p><blockquote>“收入较高和较富裕的人持有股票，尤其是受过大学教育的美国白人，”韦伯说。“他们从宽松的货币政策中受益更多。如果你把这些碎片放在一起，你确实会在数据中看到宽松的货币政策往往会增加收入和财富不平等。”</blockquote></p><p> Many economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.</p><p><blockquote>许多经济学家对涓滴经济学的想法嗤之以鼻，但从某种意义上说，这才是美联储政策的真正含义。它把钱交到银行和富人手中，然后希望他们用这些钱通过扩大业务、雇佣工人和给他们加薪来提振经济。但你猜怎么着？银行和富人在这方面做得还不够。我怎么知道？很简单：因为财富不平等不断加剧。</blockquote></p><p> To be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.</p><p><blockquote>公平地说，这里的大部分责任和责任在于国会，它可以利用其财政政策工具（如税收政策、所得税抵免，甚至像全民基本收入这样的计划——每个公民都会收到一张政府支票。）美联储也在使用其掌握的工具。此外，美联储当然不想加剧财富不平等。然而这正是它一直在做的事情。这让我想起了精神错乱的旧定义，一遍又一遍地做同样的事情，却期待不同的结果。</blockquote></p><p> The notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”</p><p><blockquote>不平等与美联储行动相关的概念越来越引人注目。一年前，时任总统候选人乔·拜登提议国会修改《美联储法案》，以“增加这一责任，并积极针对就业、工资和财富方面持续存在的种族差距”。</blockquote></p><p> 'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'</p><p><blockquote>“我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣”</blockquote></p><p> The Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.</p><p><blockquote>美联储自己似乎也意识到需要改变。2020年8月，它发布了一个新的战略框架，表明它将寻找更好的方法来衡量成功的议程，其中将包括所有惠及所有美国人的计划。美联储主席杰伊·鲍威尔表示，这意味着它将更密切地关注不同性别和种族群体的就业情况。</blockquote></p><p> Last October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)</p><p><blockquote>去年10月，旧金山联邦储备银行首席执行官玛丽·戴利发表了题为“美联储是否加剧了经济不平等？”的演讲（顺便说一句，她没有直接回答。）然而，戴利确实承认美联储需要采取更多行动，并指出“当许多人仍处于经济观望状态时，我们不会拿走潘趣酒碗。”（这是指前美联储主席威廉·麦克切斯尼·马丁（William McChesney Martin），他在1955年基本上表示，美联储的工作是在派对开始时拿走潘趣酒碗。这意味着美联储应该尽早加息，以防止经济复苏过热。）</blockquote></p><p> Daly went on to say:</p><p><blockquote>戴利接着说：</blockquote></p><p>   <i>“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.</i>    <i>The ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”</i>  Again, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.</p><p><blockquote><i>“但我们新框架最关键的方面不是关于具体政策。相反，这是关于承诺。承诺定期审查我们的战略，以确保它继续满足美国人民的需求。</i><i>这一正在进行的审查的内容很简单。我们需要倾听、研究和参与。对我们所听到的保持开放的心态，为我们发现的问题带来最好的数据和分析，并围绕阻碍我们充分发挥经济潜力的问题进行艰难的、以行动为导向的对话。”</i>同样，在细节和行动要点上有点欠缺，但足够公平。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd858593f64461e93e08798e95aa414c\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)</p><p><blockquote>加利福尼亚州旧金山-1月10日：旧金山联邦储备银行行长玛丽·戴利(Mary Daly)合影留念。（尼克·奥托为《华盛顿邮报》拍摄）</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Fed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”</p><p><blockquote>美联储主席鲍威尔本人最近也承认需要解决财富不平等问题：“越来越多的人认识到，实际上是在整个政治领域，我们需要实现更具包容性的繁荣，”《纽约时报》指出，鲍威尔上个月对国会表示。但他表示，不能指望美联储独自实现这一目标，国会需要制定“一套更广泛的政策”。</blockquote></p><p> There seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)</p><p><blockquote>媒体队伍中似乎也传来了更响亮的鼓声。除了彼得鲁的《泰晤士报》文章之外，Frontline本周还发布了“美联储的力量”，质疑为什么股市参与者等。当美联储“继续每天向金融体系注入数十亿美元……”时，他们会受益匪浅（观看预告片，听听威尔·莱曼的旁白。我喜欢他的声音。）</blockquote></p><p> OK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.</p><p><blockquote>好吧，那么美联储实际上应该做什么呢？一些与美联储关系密切的人，如彼得森国际经济研究所高级研究员、美联储国内经济部前主任、过去三任美联储主席（杰罗姆·鲍威尔、珍妮特·耶伦和本·伯南克）的高级顾问大卫·威尔科克斯（David Wilcox），并没有说出比它已经做的更多的事情。</blockquote></p><p> “Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"</p><p><blockquote>威尔科克斯说：“经济不平等是一个严重的问题，几十年来一直朝着错误的方向发展。”“我认为这是应该解决的问题。这需要政府采取有针对性的政策行动来解决。但所有这些在很大程度上超出了美联储的能力范围。”</blockquote></p><p> “The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”</p><p><blockquote>“美联储为促进经济平等所能做的最好的事情就是尽最大努力确保每个想要工作的人都能找到工作，并且价格以缓慢、稳定和可预测的速度上涨。唯一比美联储做好工作更糟糕的事情就是美联储不做好工作。我认为美联储不应该被赋予更广泛的权力。”</blockquote></p><p> And what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?</p><p><blockquote>我们问威尔科克斯，为了明确美联储的政策，针对美国特定地区或财富较少的群体与财富较多的群体采用不同利率的想法又如何呢？</blockquote></p><p> “I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”</p><p><blockquote>“我不会相信这个问题的前提，”他回答道。“首先，设计一个真正达到预期效果的制度是极其困难的。你所说的那些政策工具必须由民选代表来运用。如果国会无法有意义地解决这些问题，对我来说，这是一个强烈的信号，表明在如何最好地解决这些问题上没有达成政治共识。”</blockquote></p><p> I’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?</p><p><blockquote>我不确定我是否同意最后一点。考虑所有国会无法达成共识的事情。政府的另一个部门，无论是独立的还是其他的——行政部门、司法部门或美联储——有什么理由不采取行动来解决紧迫的需求吗？</blockquote></p><p> Petrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.</p><p><blockquote>另一方面，彼得鲁设想美联储对改变其政策更加开放。首先，她认为美联储没有正确解释自己的使命。“如果你阅读法律，你会发现第一项任务在充分就业和最大就业之间有所不同，但被描述为每个想要工作的人的工作，这意味着关注劳动参与率，而不仅仅是名义上的失业数字，”她说。这意味着彼得鲁认为美联储在就业方面应该坚持更高的标准。Petrou进一步表示，当谈到利率时，第三项指令涉及适度利率。“接近于零的利率绝不是温和的，”她说。</blockquote></p><p> So then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”</p><p><blockquote>那么，彼得罗女士，美联储应该怎么做呢？首先，像威尔科克斯一样，她不相信用特定的利率瞄准特定的群体。“这在结构上是不可能的，从政策角度来看也是不可取的，”她说。“美联储挑选赢家和输家越少越好。他们不是民选的，不负责任，他们应该坚持自己的使命，让这个使命在宏观经济中的比例尽可能小。”</blockquote></p><p> Having said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"</p><p><blockquote>话虽如此，Petrou在一定程度上是规定性的。“首先，美联储犯了一系列令人震惊的分析错误，”她说。例如，“它显示家庭收入增加是因为更多的人工作时间延长，但不是因为工资上涨。另一个解决办法是逐步但显著地减少美联储的投资组合。所以它不再拥有市场；市场拥有自己。”</blockquote></p><p> “Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"</p><p><blockquote>“另一个解决办法是，美联储没有在市场下方提供铁的安全网，并允许债券和其他市场自我纠正，因此市场纪律又回来了。美联储为资产价格泡沫设置了市场——这非常危险，需要后退一步。”</blockquote></p><p> “Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”</p><p><blockquote>“这些修复都是非常可行的，”她说。“我认为这除了可能会稍微放缓或市场调整之外不会导致任何结果。坦率地说，还有什么选择？就像吸毒者一样，这很痛，但你该怎么办，继续服用？你必须停下来。”</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Tough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?</p><p><blockquote>确实是很难的药。问题是，这种退出只会伤害富人和投机者，还是也会伤害那些处于经济阶梯下层的人？</blockquote></p><p> Certainly that is unclear.</p><p><blockquote>当然，这还不清楚。</blockquote></p><p> What if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.</p><p><blockquote>如果美联储、财政部长（前美联储主席）珍妮特·耶伦（Janet Yellen）和国会两党领导人就联邦政府应如何解决不平等问题召开峰会，会怎么样？我觉得会很棒。不幸的是，我也认为这是一个白日梦。</blockquote></p><p> Getting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer &amp; Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.</p><p><blockquote>不过，回到美联储，这是一个非凡的机构，充满了聪明的人，他们可以围着这位豌豆脑作家打转。然而，就像任何有100年历史的实体一样，它可能会陷入困境。想想美联储对我们经济生产率增长缓慢的看法。我记得听到前美联储副主席斯坦利·费舍尔坚持认为，技术和手机并没有真正提高生产率。费舍尔表示，美联储在数据中找不到笔记本电脑或手机使用带来的任何显着收益。（这让我讽刺地怀疑费舍尔公司是否曾经使用过这些物品。）然而，真正的问题是，如果你看不到你测量某样东西的方式的影响，而很明显有影响，也许你的测量方法有缺陷或有缺陷，是时候改变你做事的方式了。</blockquote></p><p> Ditto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.</p><p><blockquote>美联储改变解决不平等问题的方式也是如此。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-the-federal-reserve-can-really-help-america-100301361.html\">finance.yahoo</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-the-federal-reserve-can-really-help-america-100301361.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123760994","content_text":"1913 was a big year for America. On October 7, Henry Ford introduced the world’s first moving car assembly line in Highland Park, Michigan. Then two months later, on December 23, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act creating our nation’s central bank.\nThe evolution of the automobile over the past 108 years, from the Ford Model T to Tesla's Model X, has been nothing short of stunning. The Federal Reserve’s advances have been, well, let’s just say slower. Much slower.\nWhich brings me to my point: Yes, the Federal Reserve has greatly aided our economic well-being (by cushioning us from and even helping us avoid economic catastrophe) and yes it has expanded its influence over the decades (particularly in the 1930s and after the Great Recession in 2008/2009) but its primary modus operandi when it comes to guiding the economy have remained constant.\nI would argue those policies are now outmoded and potentially even detrimental. Yes, there has always been some downside to the Fed’s work, but now — and here’s the crux of it — because of dramatic and unprecedented moves by the central bank recently, the collateral damage may be coming close to outweighing the benefits of the moves themselves.\nSpecifically, the Fed’s boosting of the economy by keeping interest rates low disproportionately helps rich people and thereby actually disadvantages those in need. To put a fine point on it, hedge fund types, corporate executives, hotshot techies and the like are becoming way, way richer, while working people, people with only a high school degree, people of color are falling further and further behind. This isn’t socialist bleating. These are facts, and the Fed is a party to it. As such, the Fed needs a wake-up call, or maybe a reset is a better way to put it.\nI generally abhor Fed bashing. There is an entire cottage industry of mostly conspiracy-minded wingnuts, who howl that the Fed is either moving too early or too late or too much or too little, or is in cahoots with the Trilateral Commission to take over the world. I pay this little heed and suggest you do the same.\nWhat I’m talking about though has nothing to do with harebrained stuff, rather it concerns a sophisticated, highly-regarded institution that has become locked into policies, which though well-intentioned are now producing consequences that can be construed as harmful to our society and economy.\nBefore I get into the particulars, let’s first be clear about what the Federal Reserve is. For one thingthe Fed is a large and complex,(a “messy system”the Washington Post calls it), with “a dozen reserve banks based around the country, plus 20 smaller branch locations… and around 20,000 employees and $2.3 billion worth of real estate.\nThe Fed states that it “provides the nation with a safe, flexible and stable monetary and financial system.” To fulfill that role, the central bank performsa number of functionsincluding regulating banks, settling payments between financial institutions like banks and promoting consumer protection. But when it comes to actually shepherding the economy, the central bank is informed by what’s called the Fed mandate, that being employment and stable prices.\nFILE - In this May 4, 2021, file photo is the Federal Reserve in Washington. The Federal Reserve's latest nationwide business survey found that the economy strengthened further in late May and early June, despite supply-chain bottlenecks that led to price hikes. The Fed said Wednesday, July 14, 2021 that seven of its 12 regional bank districts reported strong price increases, with the other five reporting moderate gains in prices. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)More\nCongress spelled this out by establishing the mandate in theThe Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act of 1978(the Humphrey-Hawkins Act) which “establishes price stability and full employment as national economic policy objectives.” Essentially that means trying to ensure as many people as possible have jobs and guarding against too much inflation (or deflation.) A key third objective is to provide for moderate long-term interest rates.\nTo accomplish these objectives, the Fed has utilized two primary mechanisms. The first has been to lower interest rates to boost the economy when it is slow, or slowing down, and raise them to prevent it from overheating. Since 2008 the Fed has kept rates rock bottom low to help the fragile economy, battered first by the Great Recession and recently by the pandemic.\nThe second strategy is buying and selling financial instruments and assets like bonds from banks, or what is known as quantitative easing (when it buys) and quantitative tightening (when it sells.) Buying serves to flood the financial system with cash that spurs the economy, which is what the Fed has been doing so much of lately.\nKaren Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics and the author of “Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America,” notes in heropinion piece in the New York Timesthis week that: “assets the Fed has taken out of the economy as part of Q.E. (quantitative easing or buying) now stand at $8.1 trillion, or about one-third ofgross domestic product.” That’s a lot.\nIt’s important to note here that low rates and goosing the economy does help people of color, lower educated women and other less wealthy groups, argues Michael Weber, an associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. It’s just that it benefits the already advantaged more.\n“Higher income and wealthier people hold stock, particularly white college educated Americans,” Weber says. “They benefit disproportionately more from loose monetary policy. If you put the pieces together, you would indeed see in the data lax monetary policy tends to increase income and wealth inequality.”\nMany economists poo-poo the idea of trickle down economics, but in a sense that’s what the Fed's policies really are. It puts money into the hands of banks and wealthy people and then hopes they use that money to boost the economy by expanding businesses, hiring workers and giving them raises. But guess what? Banks and rich people haven’t done this enough. How do I know? Simple: Because wealth inequality keeps rising.\nTo be fair, much of the blame and responsibility here rests with Congress, which can employ its fiscal policy tools (such tax policy, the earned income tax credit and even a program like universal basic income — where every citizen would receive a government check each month.) It’s also the case that the Fed is using the tools it has at its disposal. Furthermore, of course the Fed doesn’t want to exacerbate wealth inequality. And yet that’s exactly what it keeps doing. It kind of reminds me of that old definition of insanity, as in doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.\nThe notion of inequality being linked to Fed actions has been getting more visibility. A year ago, then presidential candidateJoe Biden proposedthat Congress amend the Federal Reserve Act to “add to that responsibility and aggressively target persistent racial gaps in job, wages, and wealth.”\n'We need to achieve more inclusive prosperity'\nThe Fed itself seems to realize that it needs to change. In August 2020, it released a new strategic framework that suggests it will look at better ways of measuring a successful agenda, which would include all its programs benefiting all Americans. Fed Chair Jay Powell says that means it will look more closely at employment across gender and ethnic groups.\nLast October, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCEO Mary Daly,gave a speech titled“Is the Federal Reserve Contributing to Economic Inequality?”(which she did not answer directly, btw.) Daly did acknowledge however that the Fed needed to do more, noting that “we will not take the punch bowl away while so many remain on the economic sidelines.” (This is a reference to former Fed chairWilliam McChesney Martinwho in 1955 essentially said it was the job of the Fed to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going. Meaning it should raise interest rates sooner rather than later to prevent an economic recovery from overheating.)\nDaly went on to say:\n\n“But the most critical aspect of our new framework is not about specific policies. Rather, it is about commitment. The commitment to regularly review our strategy to ensure it continues meeting the needs of the American people.\n\n\nThe ingredients of this ongoing review are simple. We need to listen, research, and engage. Keep our minds open to what we hear, bring the best data and analysis to the problems we find, and have hard, action-oriented conversations around the issues holding us back from achieving our full economic potential.”\n\nAgain, a little short on specifics and action points but fair enough.\nSAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 10: Mary Daly, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank, poses for a photograph. (Photo by Nick Otto for the Washington Post)\nFed Chair Powell himself recently acknowledged that wealth inequality needed to be addressed: “There’s a growing realization, really across the political spectrum, that we need to achieve more inclusive prosperity,” Mr. Powell remarked to Congress last month,noted the New York Times. But he said the Fed couldn’t be expected to accomplish this on its own and that Congress would need to enact “a much broader set of policies.”\nThere seems to be a louder drumbeat coming from the media ranks as well. Besides Petrou’s Times piece,Frontline released “The Power of the Fed,”this week, which questions why the stock market players et al. benefit inordinately when the Fed “continues to pump billions of dollars into the financial system daily…” (Watch the trailer to hear theWill Lymannarration. I love his voice.)\nOK, so what in fact should the Fed do? Some close to the central bank, like David Wilcox,senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, former director of the Federal Reserve’s domestic economics division, and senior adviser to the past three Federal Reserve Chairs (Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen, and Ben Bernanke), say not much more than it’s already doing.\n“Economic inequality is a serious problem, it’s something that has been trending in the wrong direction for many decades,” Wilcox says. “It’s something I believe should be addressed. It’s something that requires focused government policy actions to fix. But all of that is largely outside the range of capabilities that the Federal Reserve has.\"\n“The best that the Fed can do to promote economic equality is to try to ensure as best it can that everybody who wants a job can find one, and that prices are going up at a slow, steady, and predictable pace. The only thing worse for inequality than the Fed doing its job would be for the Fed not to do its job. I don’t think the Fed should be given a broader set of powers.”\nAnd what about the idea of different interest rates for specific regions of the country or for groups with less wealth versus those with more wealth, to pinpoint the Fed’s policies, we ask Wilcox?\n“I’m not going to buy into the premise of the question,” he responds. “For one thing, it would be extremely difficult to design a system that would actually have its intended effect. It’s essential those policy tools you’re talking about be wielded by elected representatives of the people. If the Congress has been unable to meaningfully address these issues that to me is a strong signal that there is no political consensus around how best to address these issues.”\nI’m not sure I agree with that last point. Consider all the things in which Congress can’t achieve consensus. Is there any reason that another branch of government, independent or otherwise — executive, judicial or the Fed — shouldn’t take action to address a pressing need?\nPetrou, on the other hand, envisions a Fed which is more open to changing its stripes. First, she believes that the Fed is not interpreting its own mandate correctly. “If you read the law, you will see the first mandate varies between full and maximum employment, but is described as a job for every person who wants to work, which means paying attention to the labor participation rate, not just the nominal unemployment numbers,” she says. That means Petrou thinks the Fed should be holding itself to a higher standard when it comes to employment. Further Petrou says when it comes to interest rates, the third mandate speaks to moderate rates. “No way that rates close to zero are moderate,” she says.\nSo then what should the Fed do, Ms. Petrou? First like Wilcox, she does not believe in targeting specific groups with specific interest rates. “It’s structurally impossible, and from a policy perspective inadvisable,\" she says. “The less the Fed picks winners and losers, the better. They’re unelected, unaccountable, they should stick to their mission and make that mission as small a part of the macro economy as possible.”\nHaving said that, Petrou is prescriptive to a degree. “First, the Fed has made a series of egregious analytical errors,” she says. For example, “it showed household income up because more people were working more hours, but not because wages had risen. Another fix is the gradual but significant reduction in the Fed portfolio. So it no longer owns the market; the market owns itself.\"\n“Another fix is that the Fed does not provide an iron safety net beneath the market, and allows bonds and other markets to correct themselves, so market discipline returns. The Fed has set markets up for asset price bubbles — that’s very dangerous and it needs to step back.\"\n“Those fixes are all very doable,” she says. “I do not think it will lead to anything other than perhaps a slight slow down or market correction. Frankly, what's the alternative? Like a drug addict, it hurts, but what do you do, keep taking? You have to stop.”\nTough medicine indeed. The question is, would this withdrawal hurt just the wealthy and speculators, or those on the lower rungs of the economic ladder as well?\nCertainly that is unclear.\nWhat if the Fed, Treasury Secretary (and former Fed chair) Janet Yellen and congressional leaders from both parties, convened a summit on how the federal government should address inequality? I think it would be great. Unfortunately I also think it’s a pipe dream.\nGetting back to the Fed, though, it is a remarkable institution filled with whip-smart folks who can run circles around this pea-brain writer. Like any 100-year-old entity, however, it can get stuck in its ways. Consider the Fed’s take on what it sees as slow gains in productivity in our economy. I remember hearing former Fed vice chair, Stanley Fischer,insisting that technology and cellphones had not really improved productivity. Fischer said the Fed couldn't find any significant gains brought on by laptop or cellphone use in their data. (That made me snarkily wonder if Fischer & Co. had ever even used these items.) The real question though is if you can’t see the effects in the way you measure something and it is blindingly obvious there is an effect, maybe your means of measuring are deficient or flawed and it’s time to change the way you do things.\nDitto when it comes to the Fed changing the way it addresses inequality.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161087452,"gmtCreate":1623896693576,"gmtModify":1631885865454,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Should invest in Apple Stock","listText":"Should invest in Apple Stock","text":"Should invest in Apple Stock","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/161087452","repostId":"1152604932","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":369,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":164183182,"gmtCreate":1624180695646,"gmtModify":1631885865470,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Noted","listText":"Noted","text":"Noted","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/164183182","repostId":"1183124175","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188852865,"gmtCreate":1623429191657,"gmtModify":1631885865479,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Alibaba is a well known e-commerce company and no doubt the share price could climb up","listText":"Alibaba is a well known e-commerce company and no doubt the share price could climb up","text":"Alibaba is a well known e-commerce company and no doubt the share price could climb up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/188852865","repostId":"1107871315","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":665,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800903922,"gmtCreate":1627269167866,"gmtModify":1631885865491,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/800903922","repostId":"1143726595","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":140041881,"gmtCreate":1625621104343,"gmtModify":1631885865508,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great info","listText":"Great info","text":"Great info","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/140041881","repostId":"1122166072","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152181815,"gmtCreate":1625275870737,"gmtModify":1631885865521,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/152181815","repostId":"2148015288","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":542,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800067199,"gmtCreate":1627266664211,"gmtModify":1631885865535,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/800067199","repostId":"1187084507","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187084507","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627265195,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1187084507?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-26 10:06","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Amazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187084507","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Amazon.com is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD) payments by the end of the year and its","content":"<p><ul>  <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>&nbsp;is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD)&nbsp;payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.</li>  <li>Amazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a&nbsp;City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.</li>  <li>The City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.</li>  <li>Earlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.</li> </ul> <ul></ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>据称，该公司希望在今年年底前接受比特币（BTC-USD）支付，并在明年探索自己的代币。</li><li>据City A.M.报道称，亚马逊自2019年以来一直在制定该计划，该报道援引了一位身份不明的内部人士的话。继比特币之后，这家电子商务巨头预计将接受以太币（ETH-USD）、卡尔达诺（ADA-USD）和比特币现金（BCH-USD），然后该公司将另外八种左右最受欢迎的加密货币上线。</li><li>City A.M.周五有报道称，亚马逊的招聘信息表明了接受加密货币的潜在计划。</li><li>早些时候，在Musk、Wood、Dorsey发表评论后的几天内，比特币股价上涨至接近35,000美元的水平。</li></ul><ul></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon is said looking to accept bitcoin payments by the end of the year<blockquote>据称亚马逊希望在今年年底前接受比特币付款</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Seeking Alpha</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-26 10:06</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><ul>  <li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a>&nbsp;is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD)&nbsp;payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.</li>  <li>Amazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a&nbsp;City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.</li>  <li>The City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.</li>  <li>Earlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.</li> </ul> <ul></ul></p><p><blockquote><ul><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">亚马逊</a>据称，该公司希望在今年年底前接受比特币（BTC-USD）支付，并在明年探索自己的代币。</li><li>据City A.M.报道称，亚马逊自2019年以来一直在制定该计划，该报道援引了一位身份不明的内部人士的话。继比特币之后，这家电子商务巨头预计将接受以太币（ETH-USD）、卡尔达诺（ADA-USD）和比特币现金（BCH-USD），然后该公司将另外八种左右最受欢迎的加密货币上线。</li><li>City A.M.周五有报道称，亚马逊的招聘信息表明了接受加密货币的潜在计划。</li><li>早些时候，在Musk、Wood、Dorsey发表评论后的几天内，比特币股价上涨至接近35,000美元的水平。</li></ul><ul></ul></blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3718834-amazon-is-said-looking-to-accept-bitcoin-payments-by-the-end-of-the-year\">Seeking Alpha</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3718834-amazon-is-said-looking-to-accept-bitcoin-payments-by-the-end-of-the-year","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187084507","content_text":"Amazon.com is said to be looking to accept bitcoin (BTC-USD) payments by the end of the year and its exploring its own token for next year.\nAmazon has been working on the plan since 2019, according to a City A.M.report, which cites an unidentified insider. After bitcoin, the e-commerce behemoth is expected to accept ethereum (ETH-USD), cardano (ADA-USD) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH-USD) before the company brings another eight or so of the most popular cryptocurrencies online.\nThe City A.M. report comes after a Friday report that anAmazon job posting signals potential plan to accept cryptocurrency.\nEarlier,Bitcoin rises nears $35K level in days following Musk, Wood, Dorsey comments.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":641,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177366817,"gmtCreate":1627181391939,"gmtModify":1631885865547,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/177366817","repostId":"1118041582","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118041582","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627175995,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118041582?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-07-25 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118041582","media":"Renaissance Capital","summary":"After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs schedul","content":"<p>After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在又一周创纪录的活动之后，IPO市场预计将保持火热，未来一周将有17起IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Long-awaited retail brokerage&nbsp;<b>Robinhood Markets</b>(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.</p><p><blockquote>期待已久的零售经纪业务<b>罗宾汉市场</b>(HOOD)计划以368亿美元的市值筹集22亿美元。该公司提供无佣金零售经纪平台，月活跃用户数超过1800万。尽管2021年第一季度的收入实现了三位数的增长，但该平台依赖于交易量，最近的零售交易热潮可能难以为继。</blockquote></p><p> Vehicle battery maker&nbsp;<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.</p><p><blockquote>汽车电池制造商<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY)计划以97亿美元的市值筹集17亿美元。该公司在全球范围内生产低压汽车电池，并表示其在美洲和欧洲、中东和非洲地区拥有第一的市场地位。在息税前利润的基础上，Clarios的收入增长在2020财年因新冠疫情而转为负值后，在2021财年上半年加速。</blockquote></p><p> Altice’s ad-tech platform&nbsp;<b>Teads</b>(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.</p><p><blockquote>Altice的广告技术平台<b>Teads</b>(TEAD)计划以46亿美元的市值筹集7.51亿美元。Teads为广告商和出版商运营一个基于云的程序化数字广告平台。Teads盈利稳健增长，为约3,100家出版商提供货币化服务。</blockquote></p><p> Education software provider&nbsp;<b>PowerSchool Holdings</b>(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>教育软件提供商<b>动力学校控股</b>(PWSC)计划以37亿美元的市值筹集7.5亿美元。该公司为教师提供了一个教育平台，用于管理课堂活动，如收集作业和评分作业。PowerSchool为全球90多个国家的12,000多名客户提供服务，在2021年第一季度实现了净利润盈利。</blockquote></p><p> After withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,<b>Dole</b>(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.</p><p><blockquote>在2018年撤回IPO尝试后，<b>多尔</b>（都乐）计划以20亿美元的市值筹集5.59亿美元。这家领先的水果和蔬菜公司向全球80多个国家提供来自30多个国家的300多种产品。都乐增长缓慢且盈利，其产品是与Total Product合并时推出的。</blockquote></p><p> Language learning platform&nbsp;<b>Duolingo</b>(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>语言学习平台<b>多邻国</b>(DUOL)计划以41亿美元的市值筹集4.6亿美元。多邻国为超过3亿用户提供了一个学习30多种新语言的在线平台。受益于与新冠疫情相关的需求增长，多邻国在2020年实现了三位数的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Traeger</b>(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>特雷格</b>（库克）计划以22亿美元的市值筹集4亿美元。这家公司生产具有技术功能的优质后院木质颗粒烤架，允许业主通过Traeger应用程序对他们的烤架进行编程、监控和控制。Traeger是木质颗粒烤架的类别领导者，从2017年到2020年，收入以28%的CAGR增长。</blockquote></p><p> Israeli anti-fraud firm&nbsp;<b>Riskified</b>(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以色列反欺诈公司<b>风险化</b>(RSKD)计划以31亿美元的市值筹集3.33亿美元。这家公司为企业提供电子商务欺诈保护。Riskified不断增长但尚未盈利，其自由现金流在2021年第一季度上转为正值。</blockquote></p><p> Financial software provider&nbsp;<b>MeridianLink</b>(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.</p><p><blockquote>财务软件提供商<b>子午线链接</b>(MLNK)计划以21亿美元的市值筹集3亿美元。MeridianLink为中端市场社区银行和信用合作社提供基于云的数字借贷和开户平台。尽管业务具有周期性，但由于强劲的抵押贷款活动，该公司在2020财年实现了两位数的有机增长。</blockquote></p><p> Smart home integration system&nbsp;<b>Snap One Holdings</b>(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>智能家居集成系统<b>Snap一号控股</b>(SNPO)计划以15亿美元的市值筹集2.7亿美元。该公司为超过16,000家专业集成商提供智能家居技术产品。Snap一号表现出稳健的增长，并在2021年第一季度按息税前利润计算实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Specialty funding solutions provider&nbsp;<b>Preston Hollow Community Capital</b>(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.</p><p><blockquote>专业融资解决方案提供商<b>普雷斯顿霍洛社区资本</b>(PHCC)计划以23亿美元的市值筹集2亿美元。该公司是为对美国当地社区具有重大社会和经济重要性的项目提供专业影响力融资解决方案的市场领导者。它服务于各种领域，包括基础设施、教育、医疗保健和住房。</blockquote></p><p> Vaccine biotech&nbsp;<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><blockquote>疫苗生物技术<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX)计划以5.9亿美元的市值筹集1.5亿美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术最初专注于利用其病毒样颗粒平台技术开发针对传染性呼吸道疾病的疫苗。其最先进的候选药物目前正处于新型冠状病毒病的1/2期试验中。</blockquote></p><p> Cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Candel Therapeutics</b>(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>癌症生物技术<b>坎德尔治疗公司</b>(CADL)计划以3.98亿美元的市值筹集8500万美元。Candel最先进的候选药物目前正在与前药伐昔洛韦联合治疗新诊断的中度或高风险进展的局限性前列腺癌的3期试验中。该公司预计将在2024年完成2021年第三季度的注册并公布最终数据。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Rare disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Rallybio</b>(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.</p><p><blockquote>罕见病生物技术<b>拉利比奥</b>(RLYB)计划以4.65亿美元的市值筹集8100万美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术正在开发罕见疾病的抗体疗法。其主导项目目前正在1/2期试验中评估治疗胎儿和新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ocean Biomedical</b>(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.</p><p><blockquote><b>海洋生物医学</b>(OCEA)计划以5.06亿美元的市值筹集5000万美元。该公司目前正在开展肿瘤学、纤维化、传染病和炎症方面的临床前项目，这些项目已直接或间接获得布朗大学、斯坦福大学和罗德岛医院的许可。</blockquote></p><p> After postponing in November 2020,<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.</p><p><blockquote>2020年11月延期后，<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB)计划以2.15亿美元的市值筹集4400万美元。这家1期生物技术公司正在开发同种异体γ-δ T细胞疗法来治疗实体瘤。尽管γ-δ T细胞有可能治疗实体瘤，但该公司还处于非常早期的阶段，并且仅为有限数量的患者提供了剂量。</blockquote></p><p> Female cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Context Therapeutics</b>(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.</p><p><blockquote>女性癌症生物技术<b>情境疗法</b>(CNTX)计划以9300万美元的市值筹集2000万美元。背景是开发女性癌症的治疗方法，如乳腺癌、卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌。该公司的主要候选药物目前正处于卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的2期试验中，预计将于21年下半年和22年上半年获得初步结果。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b38a8af5f92621b2633830553616b5d\" tg-width=\"1271\" tg-height=\"702\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5faec597a337345b21c846808295821d\" tg-width=\"1272\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/021cc62ff4eaabd0b6a7dee91fc0d63e\" tg-width=\"1270\" tg-height=\"483\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2021年7月22日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.0%，而标普500上涨16.3%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌3.0%，而ACWX指数上涨8.1%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括EQT Partners和思摩尔国际。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603787993745","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS IPO Week Ahead: 17 IPOs are coming<blockquote>未来一周美国IPO：17家IPO即将上市</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Renaissance Capital</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-25 09:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.</p><p><blockquote>在又一周创纪录的活动之后，IPO市场预计将保持火热，未来一周将有17起IPO。</blockquote></p><p> Long-awaited retail brokerage&nbsp;<b>Robinhood Markets</b>(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.</p><p><blockquote>期待已久的零售经纪业务<b>罗宾汉市场</b>(HOOD)计划以368亿美元的市值筹集22亿美元。该公司提供无佣金零售经纪平台，月活跃用户数超过1800万。尽管2021年第一季度的收入实现了三位数的增长，但该平台依赖于交易量，最近的零售交易热潮可能难以为继。</blockquote></p><p> Vehicle battery maker&nbsp;<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.</p><p><blockquote>汽车电池制造商<b>Clarios International</b>(BTRY)计划以97亿美元的市值筹集17亿美元。该公司在全球范围内生产低压汽车电池，并表示其在美洲和欧洲、中东和非洲地区拥有第一的市场地位。在息税前利润的基础上，Clarios的收入增长在2020财年因新冠疫情而转为负值后，在2021财年上半年加速。</blockquote></p><p> Altice’s ad-tech platform&nbsp;<b>Teads</b>(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.</p><p><blockquote>Altice的广告技术平台<b>Teads</b>(TEAD)计划以46亿美元的市值筹集7.51亿美元。Teads为广告商和出版商运营一个基于云的程序化数字广告平台。Teads盈利稳健增长，为约3,100家出版商提供货币化服务。</blockquote></p><p> Education software provider&nbsp;<b>PowerSchool Holdings</b>(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>教育软件提供商<b>动力学校控股</b>(PWSC)计划以37亿美元的市值筹集7.5亿美元。该公司为教师提供了一个教育平台，用于管理课堂活动，如收集作业和评分作业。PowerSchool为全球90多个国家的12,000多名客户提供服务，在2021年第一季度实现了净利润盈利。</blockquote></p><p> After withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,<b>Dole</b>(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.</p><p><blockquote>在2018年撤回IPO尝试后，<b>多尔</b>（都乐）计划以20亿美元的市值筹集5.59亿美元。这家领先的水果和蔬菜公司向全球80多个国家提供来自30多个国家的300多种产品。都乐增长缓慢且盈利，其产品是与Total Product合并时推出的。</blockquote></p><p> Language learning platform&nbsp;<b>Duolingo</b>(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.</p><p><blockquote>语言学习平台<b>多邻国</b>(DUOL)计划以41亿美元的市值筹集4.6亿美元。多邻国为超过3亿用户提供了一个学习30多种新语言的在线平台。受益于与新冠疫情相关的需求增长，多邻国在2020年实现了三位数的增长。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Traeger</b>(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.</p><p><blockquote><b>特雷格</b>（库克）计划以22亿美元的市值筹集4亿美元。这家公司生产具有技术功能的优质后院木质颗粒烤架，允许业主通过Traeger应用程序对他们的烤架进行编程、监控和控制。Traeger是木质颗粒烤架的类别领导者，从2017年到2020年，收入以28%的CAGR增长。</blockquote></p><p> Israeli anti-fraud firm&nbsp;<b>Riskified</b>(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>以色列反欺诈公司<b>风险化</b>(RSKD)计划以31亿美元的市值筹集3.33亿美元。这家公司为企业提供电子商务欺诈保护。Riskified不断增长但尚未盈利，其自由现金流在2021年第一季度上转为正值。</blockquote></p><p> Financial software provider&nbsp;<b>MeridianLink</b>(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.</p><p><blockquote>财务软件提供商<b>子午线链接</b>(MLNK)计划以21亿美元的市值筹集3亿美元。MeridianLink为中端市场社区银行和信用合作社提供基于云的数字借贷和开户平台。尽管业务具有周期性，但由于强劲的抵押贷款活动，该公司在2020财年实现了两位数的有机增长。</blockquote></p><p> Smart home integration system&nbsp;<b>Snap One Holdings</b>(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.</p><p><blockquote>智能家居集成系统<b>Snap一号控股</b>(SNPO)计划以15亿美元的市值筹集2.7亿美元。该公司为超过16,000家专业集成商提供智能家居技术产品。Snap一号表现出稳健的增长，并在2021年第一季度按息税前利润计算实现盈利。</blockquote></p><p> Specialty funding solutions provider&nbsp;<b>Preston Hollow Community Capital</b>(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.</p><p><blockquote>专业融资解决方案提供商<b>普雷斯顿霍洛社区资本</b>(PHCC)计划以23亿美元的市值筹集2亿美元。该公司是为对美国当地社区具有重大社会和经济重要性的项目提供专业影响力融资解决方案的市场领导者。它服务于各种领域，包括基础设施、教育、医疗保健和住房。</blockquote></p><p> Vaccine biotech&nbsp;<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><blockquote>疫苗生物技术<b>Icosavax</b>(ICVX)计划以5.9亿美元的市值筹集1.5亿美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术最初专注于利用其病毒样颗粒平台技术开发针对传染性呼吸道疾病的疫苗。其最先进的候选药物目前正处于新型冠状病毒病的1/2期试验中。</blockquote></p><p> Cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Candel Therapeutics</b>(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.</p><p><blockquote>癌症生物技术<b>坎德尔治疗公司</b>(CADL)计划以3.98亿美元的市值筹集8500万美元。Candel最先进的候选药物目前正在与前药伐昔洛韦联合治疗新诊断的中度或高风险进展的局限性前列腺癌的3期试验中。该公司预计将在2024年完成2021年第三季度的注册并公布最终数据。</blockquote></p><p></p><p> Rare disease biotech&nbsp;<b>Rallybio</b>(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.</p><p><blockquote>罕见病生物技术<b>拉利比奥</b>(RLYB)计划以4.65亿美元的市值筹集8100万美元。这一临床阶段的生物技术正在开发罕见疾病的抗体疗法。其主导项目目前正在1/2期试验中评估治疗胎儿和新生儿同种免疫性血小板减少症。</blockquote></p><p> <b>Ocean Biomedical</b>(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.</p><p><blockquote><b>海洋生物医学</b>(OCEA)计划以5.06亿美元的市值筹集5000万美元。该公司目前正在开展肿瘤学、纤维化、传染病和炎症方面的临床前项目，这些项目已直接或间接获得布朗大学、斯坦福大学和罗德岛医院的许可。</blockquote></p><p> After postponing in November 2020,<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.</p><p><blockquote>2020年11月延期后，<b>IN8bio</b>(INAB)计划以2.15亿美元的市值筹集4400万美元。这家1期生物技术公司正在开发同种异体γ-δ T细胞疗法来治疗实体瘤。尽管γ-δ T细胞有可能治疗实体瘤，但该公司还处于非常早期的阶段，并且仅为有限数量的患者提供了剂量。</blockquote></p><p> Female cancer biotech&nbsp;<b>Context Therapeutics</b>(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.</p><p><blockquote>女性癌症生物技术<b>情境疗法</b>(CNTX)计划以9300万美元的市值筹集2000万美元。背景是开发女性癌症的治疗方法，如乳腺癌、卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌。该公司的主要候选药物目前正处于卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的2期试验中，预计将于21年下半年和22年上半年获得初步结果。</blockquote></p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b38a8af5f92621b2633830553616b5d\" tg-width=\"1271\" tg-height=\"702\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5faec597a337345b21c846808295821d\" tg-width=\"1272\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/021cc62ff4eaabd0b6a7dee91fc0d63e\" tg-width=\"1270\" tg-height=\"483\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><blockquote></blockquote></p><p> <b>IPO Market Snapshot</b></p><p><blockquote><b>IPO市场快照</b></blockquote></p><p> The Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&amp;P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.</p><p><blockquote>文艺复兴IPO指数是新上市公司的市值加权篮子。截至2021年7月22日，文艺复兴IPO指数今年迄今下跌1.0%，而标普500上涨16.3%。Renaissance Capital的IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPO）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括Snowflake（SNOW）和Palantir Technologies（PLTR）。Renaissance International IPO指数今年迄今下跌3.0%，而ACWX指数上涨8.1%。Renaissance Capital的国际IPO ETF（纽约证券交易所股票代码：IPOS）跟踪该指数，持有的顶级ETF包括EQT Partners和思摩尔国际。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/84600/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Robinhood%E2%80%99s-billion-dollar-deal-headlines-a-17-IPO-week\">Renaissance Capital</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","RSKD":"Riskified Ltd.","DOLE":"都乐食品","INAB":"IN8bio, Inc.","FEOVF":"Oceanic Iron Ore Corp.","RLYB":"Rallybio Corp.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SNPO":"Snap One Holdings Corp.","TEAD":"Teads Holding","DUOL":"多邻国","ICVX":"Icosavax, Inc.","PWSC":"PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.","CNTX":"Context Therapeutics Inc.","CADLF":"CADELER AS",".DJI":"道琼斯","COOK":"Traeger Inc. (TGPX Holdings I LLC)","HOOD":"Robinhood","MLNK":"MeridianLink, Inc. (ex-Project Angel Parent, LLC)"},"source_url":"https://www.renaissancecapital.com/IPO-Center/News/84600/US-IPO-Week-Ahead-Robinhood%E2%80%99s-billion-dollar-deal-headlines-a-17-IPO-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118041582","content_text":"After another week of record activity, the IPO market is expected to remain hot with 17 IPOs scheduled for the week ahead.\nLong-awaited retail brokerage Robinhood Markets(HOOD) plans to raise $2.2 billion at a $36.8 billion market cap. The company offers a no-commission retail brokerage platform with over 18 million MAUs. Despite triple-digit revenue growth in the 1Q21, the platform is dependent on trading volumes, and the recent retail trading boom may be unsustainable.\nVehicle battery maker Clarios International(BTRY) plans to raise $1.7 billion at a $9.7 billion market cap. The company manufactures low-voltage vehicles batteries globally, stating that it has the number one market position in the Americas and EMEA. Profitable on an EBIT basis, Clarios saw revenue growth accelerate in the 1H FY21 after turning negative in the FY20 due to COVID.\nAltice’s ad-tech platform Teads(TEAD) plans to raise $751 million at a $4.6 billion market cap. Teads operates a cloud-based programmatic digital advertising platform for advertisers and publishers. Profitable with solid growth, Teads provides monetization services to about 3,100 publishers.\nEducation software provider PowerSchool Holdings(PWSC) plans to raise $750 million at a $3.7 billion market cap. The company provides an education platform for teachers to manage classroom activities such as collecting work and grading assignments. Serving over 12,000 customers in over 90 countries globally, PowerSchool turned profitable on a net income basis in the 1Q21.\nAfter withdrawing its IPO attempt in 2018,Dole(DOLE) plans to raise $559 million at a $2.0 billion market cap. This leading fruit and vegetable company offers over 300 products sourced from over 30 countries to over 80 countries globally. Slow growing and profitable, Dole's offering is being made in connection with its merger with Total Produce.\nLanguage learning platform Duolingo(DUOL) plans to raise $460 million at a $4.1 billion market cap. Duolingo provides an online platform for over 300 million users to learn over 30 new languages. Benefiting from a COVID-related boost in demand, Duolingo posted triple-digit growth in 2020.\nTraeger(COOK) plans to raise $400 million at a $2.2 billion market cap. This company makes premium backyard wood pellet grills with a tech feature, allowing owners to program, monitor, and control their grill through the Traeger app. Traeger is a category leader of the wood pellet grill, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR from 2017 to 2020.\nIsraeli anti-fraud firm Riskified(RSKD) plans to raise $333 million at a $3.1 billion market cap. This company provides e-commerce fraud protection for enterprises. Growing but unprofitable, Riskified saw its free cash flow swing positive in the 1Q21.\nFinancial software provider MeridianLink(MLNK) plans to raise $300 million at a $2.1 billion market cap. MeridianLink offers a cloud-based digital lending and account opening platform for mid-market community banks and credit unions. Although business is cyclical, the company saw double-digit organic growth in the FY20 due to strong mortgage activity.\nSmart home integration system Snap One Holdings(SNPO) plans to raise $270 million at a $1.5 billion market cap. This company provides smart home technology products to over 16,000 professional integrators. Snap One has demonstrated solid growth and was profitable on an EBIT basis in the 1Q21.\nSpecialty funding solutions provider Preston Hollow Community Capital(PHCC) plans to raise $200 million at a $2.3 billion market cap. This company is a market leader in providing specialized impact financing solutions for projects of significant social and economic importance to local communities in the US. It serves a variety of areas, including infrastructure, education, healthcare, and housing.\nVaccine biotech Icosavax(ICVX) plans to raise $150 million at a $590 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is initially focused on developing vaccines against infectious respiratory diseases using its virus-like particle platform technology. Its most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 1/2 trial for SARS-CoV-2.\nCancer biotech Candel Therapeutics(CADL) plans to raise $85 million at a $398 million market cap. Candel's most advanced candidate is currently in a Phase 3 trial in combination with prodrug valacyclovir for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer with an intermediate or high-risk for progression. The company expects to complete enrollment in the 3Q21 with a final data readout in 2024.\nRare disease biotech Rallybio(RLYB) plans to raise $81 million at a $465 million market cap. This clinical stage biotech is developing antibody therapies for rare diseases. Its lead program is currently being evaluated to treat fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in a Phase 1/2 trial.\nOcean Biomedical(OCEA) plans to raise $50 million at a $506 million market cap. The company is currently pursuing preclinical programs in oncology, fibrosis, infectious disease, and inflammation that have been licensed directly or indirectly from Brown University, Stanford University, and Rhode Island Hospital.\nAfter postponing in November 2020,IN8bio(INAB) plans to raise $44 million at a $215 million market cap. This Phase 1 biotech is developing allogeneic gamma-delta T cell therapies to treat solid tumors. Although gamma-delta T cells could potentially treat solid tumors, the company is very early stage and has dosed a limited number of patients.\nFemale cancer biotech Context Therapeutics(CNTX) plans to raise $20 million at a $93 million market cap. Context is developing treatments for female cancers, such as breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The company’s lead candidate is currently in Phase 2 trials for ovarian and endometrial cancer, with preliminary results expected in the 2H21 and the 1H22.\n\nIPO Market Snapshot\nThe Renaissance IPO Indices are market cap weighted baskets of newly public companies. As of 7/22/2021, the Renaissance IPO Index was down 1.0% year-to-date, while the S&P 500 was up 16.3%. Renaissance Capital's IPO ETF (NYSE: IPO) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include Snowflake (SNOW) and Palantir Technologies (PLTR). The Renaissance International IPO Index was down 3.0% year-to-date, while the ACWX was up 8.1%. Renaissance Capital’s International IPO ETF (NYSE: IPOS) tracks the index, and top ETF holdings include EQT Partners and Smoore International.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DUOL":0.9,"CADLF":0.9,"RSKD":0.9,"FEOVF":0.9,"SNPO":0.9,"RLYB":0.9,"DOLE":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"ICVX":0.9,"PWSC":0.9,"PHCC":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"COOK":0.9,"CNTX":0.9,"INAB":0.9,"BTRY":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"HOOD":0.9,"MLNK":0.9,"TEAD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1060,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175160641,"gmtCreate":1627014359483,"gmtModify":1631885865561,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175160641","repostId":"2153918609","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179771309,"gmtCreate":1626581191901,"gmtModify":1631885865565,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/179771309","repostId":"2152968147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":910,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170533971,"gmtCreate":1626441519993,"gmtModify":1631885865581,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/170533971","repostId":"1130848269","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":867,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":123436355,"gmtCreate":1624433614577,"gmtModify":1631885865609,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good info","listText":"Good info","text":"Good info","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/123436355","repostId":"1174713517","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":887360770,"gmtCreate":1631977673690,"gmtModify":1632804996743,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887360770","repostId":"887338467","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":887338467,"gmtCreate":1631973029259,"gmtModify":1631973029259,"author":{"id":"3443259955812259","authorId":"3443259955812259","name":"鑫鑫洋","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2d2f1f10442d11e847ff989eb36f7a0","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3443259955812259","authorIdStr":"3443259955812259"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","listText":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/36984908995200\">@小虎活动</a>这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","text":"参与晒晒家乡的月亮活动第一张拍摄于天津市津门津塔，第二张拍摄于长焦月球表面，第三张借用我虎个元素。@小虎活动这样符合要求吗？请回复一下，谢谢啦！","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f3044f5fedd823847e13b1c45b2eec6","width":"1620","height":"1080"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5e311c5a77a11b583ce5677b6a18154","width":"500","height":"613"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5535c1253b678f0ace5413f59947416","width":"600","height":"590"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/887338467","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175187150,"gmtCreate":1627014271670,"gmtModify":1631885865621,"author":{"id":"3586338902882279","authorId":"3586338902882279","name":"Saras","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bf0de0dd3a4c083e202aad7b1bc71ae","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586338902882279","authorIdStr":"3586338902882279"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏼","listText":"👍🏼","text":"👍🏼","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/175187150","repostId":"2153793716","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1059,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}