Like_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":693070894,"tweetId":"693070894","gmtCreate":1639955028657,"gmtModify":1639955029337,"author":{"id":3586941861951066,"idStr":"3586941861951066","authorId":3586941861951066,"authorIdStr":"3586941861951066","name":"EHG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28e4734e50f795c3218330cbb6c3e9a0","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":65,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Like&nbsp;</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Like&nbsp;</body></html>","text":"Like","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/693070894","repostId":1197053463,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197053463","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639954936,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1197053463?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-20 07:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The year Reddit changed Wall Street forever<blockquote>Reddit永远改变了华尔街的一年</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197053463","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) - Nearly a year ago, a bunch of day traders from the fringes of the internet","content":"New York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Nearly a year ago, a bunch of day traders from the fringes of the internet figured out how to beat Wall Street at its own game. Or so they thought.<blockquote>纽约（CNN商业）——大约一年前，一群来自互联网边缘的日内交易者想出了如何在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街。至少他们是这么认为的。</blockquote> Around mid-January, shares of&nbsp;GameStop(GME)&nbsp;— a brick-and-mortar retailer that most analysts expected to go the way of Blockbuster — began surging, fueled by a pile-on of day traders from the WallStreetBets forum on Reddit. They were doubling, tripling, their positions by the day, chanting \"diamond hands,\" and \"to the moon,\" rally cries to hold onto their shares rather than cash out.&nbsp;The term \"meme stock\" sauntered into the mainstream.<blockquote>1月中旬左右，在Reddit上WallStreetBets论坛上大量日内交易者的推动下，游戏驿站(GME)（一家大多数分析师预计将重蹈百视达(Blockbuster)的覆辙）的股价开始飙升。他们的头寸每天都在增加一倍、三倍，高呼“钻石之手”和“奔向月球”，集会口号是持有自己的股票而不是套现。“模因股票”一词逐渐成为主流。</blockquote> Better still, these amateur traders, who winkingly referred to themselves as \"Apes,\" were sticking it to the fat cats on Wall Street who'd heavily shorted GameStop. The more people tried to dismiss the Reddit crowd — Citron Research called them \"the suckers at this poker game\" — the more they drove up the stock, squeezing the short sellers.<blockquote>更好的是，这些自称为“猿类”的业余交易员，把钱花在了那些严重做空游戏驿站的华尔街大佬身上。越多的人试图解雇Reddit人群——Citron Research称他们为“这场扑克游戏中的傻瓜”——他们就越会推高股价，挤压卖空者。</blockquote> In the end, the GameStop rally sent the stock up 1,600% before coming back down to Earth. Citron, meanwhile,&nbsp;shut down&nbsp;its short-selling business after the episode. Melvin Capital, one of Wall Street's elite hedge funds, was so&nbsp;financially gutted&nbsp;it had to be bailed out&nbsp;by&nbsp;two other firms. The Apes rejoiced. Who's the sucker now?<blockquote>最终，游戏驿站的反弹使该股上涨了1,600%，然后又回到了现实。与此同时，香橼在事件发生后关闭了其卖空业务。华尔街精英对冲基金之一梅尔文资本(Melvin Capital)的财务状况严重受损，不得不由另外两家公司进行救助。猿类欢欣鼓舞。现在谁是傻瓜？</blockquote> It looked, in the moment, like David had taken down Goliath. But the giant was merely caught off guard.<blockquote>在那一刻，看起来就像是大卫打倒了歌利亚。但巨人只是措手不及。</blockquote> The GameStop saga, brief though it was, marked a turning point for Wall Street. Did the Apes&nbsp;overthrow the establishment? No, far from it. But the spectacle of the uprising was every bit as important as the result. Once GameStop caught the public's imagination, Wall Street could no longer afford to dismiss social media or the investors who congregate on it.<blockquote>游戏驿站事件虽然短暂，但却标志着华尔街的一个转折点。猿类推翻了当权派吗？不，远非如此。但是起义的场面和结果一样重要。一旦游戏驿站抓住了公众的想象力，华尔街就再也不能忽视社交媒体或聚集在社交媒体上的投资者了。</blockquote> \"Most people saw it as this revolution,\" says Spencer Jakab, a Wall Street Journal columnist and author of a forthcoming book about the GameStop rally. \"And a lot of young people are still convinced that they're fighting some kind of virtuous fight against evil hedge funds... but, basically, the story is the same: If you think you've figured something out to beat Wall Street, you probably haven't.\"<blockquote>“大多数人认为这是一场革命，”Spencer Jakab说，他是《华尔街日报》的专栏作家，也是即将出版的一本关于游戏驿站集会的书的作者。“许多年轻人仍然相信，他们正在与邪恶的对冲基金进行某种良性斗争……但是，基本上，故事是一样的：如果你认为你已经找到了击败华尔街的方法，你可能还没有。”</blockquote> The Reddit army's moment fizzled in early February when GameStop cratered to around $45. Those who joined late, buying the stock at its peak of around $480, were left with huge losses. These days, GME trades around $145 — up nearly 700% for the year, but far from January's highs.<blockquote>Reddit军队的时刻在2月初失败了，当时游戏驿站跌至45美元左右。那些较晚加入的人，在该股480美元左右的峰值买入，却遭受了巨大损失。如今，GME的交易价格约为145美元，今年上涨了近700%，但远未达到1月份的高点。</blockquote> Jaime Rogozinski, the founder of WallStreetBets, acknowledges that what happened with GameStop wasn't a revolution per se, but that doesn't mean the community or the ethos that guided it — sniffing out market inefficiencies and exploiting them for profit — is dead.<blockquote>WallStreetBets创始人海梅·罗戈津斯基(Jaime Rogozinski)承认，游戏驿站发生的事情本身并不是一场革命，但这并不意味着社区或指导它的精神——嗅出市场效率低下并利用它们谋取利润——已经死亡。</blockquote> \"They're little accounts, but they've now figured out how to push a stock price, even with their insignificant size,\" Rogozinski told CNN Business.&nbsp; \"They're not going to stop looking for these things.\"<blockquote>罗戈津斯基告诉CNN商业频道：“他们是小账户，但他们现在已经想出了如何推高股价，即使他们的规模微不足道。他们不会停止寻找这些东西。”</blockquote> The original WallStreetBets page has more than doubled in size since the GME rally, going from about 5 million at the end of January to over 11 million now -- an explosion of popularity that's put off some early adherents who broke off to form new, more specialized investing groups on Reddit and elsewhere.<blockquote>自GME集会以来，最初的WallStreetBets页面的规模增加了一倍多，从1月底的约500万增加到现在的超过1100万——这种受欢迎程度的爆发让一些早期追随者望而却步，他们离开并组建了新的、更专业的Reddit和其他地方的投资团体。</blockquote> So who won, David or Goliath? Maybe both.<blockquote>那么谁赢了，大卫还是歌利亚？也许两者都有。</blockquote> The force of the January squeeze was powerful enough to make even the stodgiest of Wall Street elite sit up and take notice. US regulators are paying&nbsp;close attention, too.<blockquote>一月份挤压的力量强大到足以让华尔街最古板的精英们坐起来并注意到这一点。美国监管机构也在密切关注。</blockquote> \"You'll be hard-pressed to find a company that has over 100% short float now, right?\" Rogozinski says. In other words, no Wall Street firm with any sense wants to end up like Melvin, a titan that was squeezed so hard by the GameStop surge it lost 53% of its fund in under a month. If you massively short a stock and run up your exposure, you're putting a target on your back.<blockquote>“现在很难找到一家空头流通量超过100%的公司，对吧？”罗戈津斯基说。换句话说，没有一家有理智的华尔街公司愿意落得像Melvin那样的下场，Melvin是一家受到游戏驿站飙升挤压的巨头，在不到一个月的时间里损失了53%的基金。如果你大量做空一只股票并增加你的风险敞口，你就是在背上放了一个目标。</blockquote> WallStreetBets, with all its crude jargon and machismo, became a check on institutional investors who had perhaps gotten too cozy. Not wanting to be&nbsp;wrong twice, firms have hired social media managers and subscribed to services that monitor social chatter. JPMorgan, for one, is currently testing a new tool aimed at protecting clients from losses tied to meme stocks,Bloomberg reported&nbsp;earlier this month.<blockquote>WallStreetBets凭借其粗俗的行话和大男子主义，成为了对可能过于舒适的机构投资者的制衡。不想犯两次错误，公司聘请了社交媒体经理，并订阅了监控社交聊天的服务。据彭博社本月早些时候报道，摩根大通目前正在测试一种新工具，旨在保护客户免受与meme股票相关的损失。</blockquote> \"If you don't have a clear view of what retail is up to, it feels like you're driving partially blind,\" Chris Berthe, JPMorgan's global co-head of cash equities trading, told Bloomberg.<blockquote>摩根大通现金股票交易全球联席主管克里斯·贝尔特(Chris Berthe)告诉彭博社：“如果你不清楚零售业在做什么，就会感觉自己是部分盲目驾驶。”</blockquote> For better or worse, Jakab says, all of this has made Wall Street even better at making money.<blockquote>贾卡布说，无论好坏，所有这些都让华尔街更擅长赚钱。</blockquote> \"I think what's changed is that Wall Street is totally aware of what's going on,\" says Jakab. \"And they are not going to get caught out in the same way again. They monitor social media, they're going to be more judicious about getting exposed.\"<blockquote>“我认为改变的是华尔街完全意识到正在发生的事情，”贾卡布说。“他们不会再以同样的方式被抓到。他们监控社交媒体，他们会更加明智地暴露自己。”</blockquote> For all the so-called Apes accomplished, Jakab argues, in the end it was the little guy that got hosed in the GameStop saga. His book, \"The Revolution That Wasn't: GameStop, Reddit, and the Fleecing of Small Investors,\" Jakab makes the case that despite all the talk of sticking it to the Man, the rally only tipped the odds further in Wall Street's favor.<blockquote>贾卡布认为，对于所有所谓的类人猿来说，最终在《游戏驿站》传奇中被扫地出门的是小家伙。贾卡布在他的书《不是的革命：游戏驿站、Reddit和对小投资者的诈骗》中指出，尽管人们都在谈论坚持到底，但这次反弹只会进一步使华尔街的胜算对华尔街有利。</blockquote> \"Wall Street likes this,\" he told CNN Business. \"Wall Street likes millions of young people who hate Wall Street putting their money on Wall Street — they don't care if they're hated.\"<blockquote>“华尔街喜欢这样，”他告诉CNN商业频道。“华尔街喜欢数百万讨厌华尔街的年轻人把钱投入华尔街——他们不在乎自己是否被讨厌。”</blockquote> Perhaps the more significant legacy of WallStreetBets and the GME saga is cultural. Spend half a minute on the site and you quickly understand this isn't a convention of Boomers in suits but rather a bunch of young Millennials and Gen Zers (still mostly male) talking about complicated options trades via memes and emoji.<blockquote>也许WallStreetBets和GME传奇更重要的遗产是文化。在网站上花半分钟，你很快就会明白这不是西装革履的婴儿潮一代的惯例，而是一群年轻的千禧一代和Z世代（仍然以男性为主）通过模因和表情符号谈论复杂的期权交易。</blockquote> \"The best analogy that I can come up with is, you've had these seasoned professional poker players playing this game for decades, and now they've all had to scoot over to make room for this new player that doesn't use the same rules,\" Rogozinski says. \"You have somewhat of a reckless individual that has a different concept of risk and a different objective. And so these players now have to adjust their strategy.\"<blockquote>“我能想到的最好的类比是，这些经验丰富的职业扑克玩家已经玩了几十年了，现在他们都不得不快速移动，为这个不使用相同规则的新玩家腾出空间，”罗戈津斯基说。“你有一个有点鲁莽的人，他们有不同的风险概念和不同的目标。所以这些玩家现在必须调整他们的策略。”</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The year Reddit changed Wall Street forever<blockquote>Reddit永远改变了华尔街的一年</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe year Reddit changed Wall Street forever<blockquote>Reddit永远改变了华尔街的一年</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nCNN Business2021-12-20 07:02\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nNew York (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;Nearly a year ago, a bunch of day traders from the fringes of the internet figured out how to beat Wall Street at its own game. Or so they thought.<blockquote>纽约（CNN商业）——大约一年前，一群来自互联网边缘的日内交易者想出了如何在华尔街自己的游戏中击败华尔街。至少他们是这么认为的。</blockquote> Around mid-January, shares of&nbsp;GameStop(GME)&nbsp;— a brick-and-mortar retailer that most analysts expected to go the way of Blockbuster — began surging, fueled by a pile-on of day traders from the WallStreetBets forum on Reddit. They were doubling, tripling, their positions by the day, chanting \"diamond hands,\" and \"to the moon,\" rally cries to hold onto their shares rather than cash out.&nbsp;The term \"meme stock\" sauntered into the mainstream.<blockquote>1月中旬左右，在Reddit上WallStreetBets论坛上大量日内交易者的推动下，游戏驿站(GME)（一家大多数分析师预计将重蹈百视达(Blockbuster)的覆辙）的股价开始飙升。他们的头寸每天都在增加一倍、三倍，高呼“钻石之手”和“奔向月球”，集会口号是持有自己的股票而不是套现。“模因股票”一词逐渐成为主流。</blockquote> Better still, these amateur traders, who winkingly referred to themselves as \"Apes,\" were sticking it to the fat cats on Wall Street who'd heavily shorted GameStop. The more people tried to dismiss the Reddit crowd — Citron Research called them \"the suckers at this poker game\" — the more they drove up the stock, squeezing the short sellers.<blockquote>更好的是，这些自称为“猿类”的业余交易员，把钱花在了那些严重做空游戏驿站的华尔街大佬身上。越多的人试图解雇Reddit人群——Citron Research称他们为“这场扑克游戏中的傻瓜”——他们就越会推高股价，挤压卖空者。</blockquote> In the end, the GameStop rally sent the stock up 1,600% before coming back down to Earth. Citron, meanwhile,&nbsp;shut down&nbsp;its short-selling business after the episode. Melvin Capital, one of Wall Street's elite hedge funds, was so&nbsp;financially gutted&nbsp;it had to be bailed out&nbsp;by&nbsp;two other firms. The Apes rejoiced. Who's the sucker now?<blockquote>最终，游戏驿站的反弹使该股上涨了1,600%，然后又回到了现实。与此同时，香橼在事件发生后关闭了其卖空业务。华尔街精英对冲基金之一梅尔文资本(Melvin Capital)的财务状况严重受损，不得不由另外两家公司进行救助。猿类欢欣鼓舞。现在谁是傻瓜？</blockquote> It looked, in the moment, like David had taken down Goliath. But the giant was merely caught off guard.<blockquote>在那一刻，看起来就像是大卫打倒了歌利亚。但巨人只是措手不及。</blockquote> The GameStop saga, brief though it was, marked a turning point for Wall Street. Did the Apes&nbsp;overthrow the establishment? No, far from it. But the spectacle of the uprising was every bit as important as the result. Once GameStop caught the public's imagination, Wall Street could no longer afford to dismiss social media or the investors who congregate on it.<blockquote>游戏驿站事件虽然短暂，但却标志着华尔街的一个转折点。猿类推翻了当权派吗？不，远非如此。但是起义的场面和结果一样重要。一旦游戏驿站抓住了公众的想象力，华尔街就再也不能忽视社交媒体或聚集在社交媒体上的投资者了。</blockquote> \"Most people saw it as this revolution,\" says Spencer Jakab, a Wall Street Journal columnist and author of a forthcoming book about the GameStop rally. \"And a lot of young people are still convinced that they're fighting some kind of virtuous fight against evil hedge funds... but, basically, the story is the same: If you think you've figured something out to beat Wall Street, you probably haven't.\"<blockquote>“大多数人认为这是一场革命，”Spencer Jakab说，他是《华尔街日报》的专栏作家，也是即将出版的一本关于游戏驿站集会的书的作者。“许多年轻人仍然相信，他们正在与邪恶的对冲基金进行某种良性斗争……但是，基本上，故事是一样的：如果你认为你已经找到了击败华尔街的方法，你可能还没有。”</blockquote> The Reddit army's moment fizzled in early February when GameStop cratered to around $45. Those who joined late, buying the stock at its peak of around $480, were left with huge losses. These days, GME trades around $145 — up nearly 700% for the year, but far from January's highs.<blockquote>Reddit军队的时刻在2月初失败了，当时游戏驿站跌至45美元左右。那些较晚加入的人，在该股480美元左右的峰值买入，却遭受了巨大损失。如今，GME的交易价格约为145美元，今年上涨了近700%，但远未达到1月份的高点。</blockquote> Jaime Rogozinski, the founder of WallStreetBets, acknowledges that what happened with GameStop wasn't a revolution per se, but that doesn't mean the community or the ethos that guided it — sniffing out market inefficiencies and exploiting them for profit — is dead.<blockquote>WallStreetBets创始人海梅·罗戈津斯基(Jaime Rogozinski)承认，游戏驿站发生的事情本身并不是一场革命，但这并不意味着社区或指导它的精神——嗅出市场效率低下并利用它们谋取利润——已经死亡。</blockquote> \"They're little accounts, but they've now figured out how to push a stock price, even with their insignificant size,\" Rogozinski told CNN Business.&nbsp; \"They're not going to stop looking for these things.\"<blockquote>罗戈津斯基告诉CNN商业频道：“他们是小账户，但他们现在已经想出了如何推高股价，即使他们的规模微不足道。他们不会停止寻找这些东西。”</blockquote> The original WallStreetBets page has more than doubled in size since the GME rally, going from about 5 million at the end of January to over 11 million now -- an explosion of popularity that's put off some early adherents who broke off to form new, more specialized investing groups on Reddit and elsewhere.<blockquote>自GME集会以来，最初的WallStreetBets页面的规模增加了一倍多，从1月底的约500万增加到现在的超过1100万——这种受欢迎程度的爆发让一些早期追随者望而却步，他们离开并组建了新的、更专业的Reddit和其他地方的投资团体。</blockquote> So who won, David or Goliath? Maybe both.<blockquote>那么谁赢了，大卫还是歌利亚？也许两者都有。</blockquote> The force of the January squeeze was powerful enough to make even the stodgiest of Wall Street elite sit up and take notice. US regulators are paying&nbsp;close attention, too.<blockquote>一月份挤压的力量强大到足以让华尔街最古板的精英们坐起来并注意到这一点。美国监管机构也在密切关注。</blockquote> \"You'll be hard-pressed to find a company that has over 100% short float now, right?\" Rogozinski says. In other words, no Wall Street firm with any sense wants to end up like Melvin, a titan that was squeezed so hard by the GameStop surge it lost 53% of its fund in under a month. If you massively short a stock and run up your exposure, you're putting a target on your back.<blockquote>“现在很难找到一家空头流通量超过100%的公司，对吧？”罗戈津斯基说。换句话说，没有一家有理智的华尔街公司愿意落得像Melvin那样的下场，Melvin是一家受到游戏驿站飙升挤压的巨头，在不到一个月的时间里损失了53%的基金。如果你大量做空一只股票并增加你的风险敞口，你就是在背上放了一个目标。</blockquote> WallStreetBets, with all its crude jargon and machismo, became a check on institutional investors who had perhaps gotten too cozy. Not wanting to be&nbsp;wrong twice, firms have hired social media managers and subscribed to services that monitor social chatter. JPMorgan, for one, is currently testing a new tool aimed at protecting clients from losses tied to meme stocks,Bloomberg reported&nbsp;earlier this month.<blockquote>WallStreetBets凭借其粗俗的行话和大男子主义，成为了对可能过于舒适的机构投资者的制衡。不想犯两次错误，公司聘请了社交媒体经理，并订阅了监控社交聊天的服务。据彭博社本月早些时候报道，摩根大通目前正在测试一种新工具，旨在保护客户免受与meme股票相关的损失。</blockquote> \"If you don't have a clear view of what retail is up to, it feels like you're driving partially blind,\" Chris Berthe, JPMorgan's global co-head of cash equities trading, told Bloomberg.<blockquote>摩根大通现金股票交易全球联席主管克里斯·贝尔特(Chris Berthe)告诉彭博社：“如果你不清楚零售业在做什么，就会感觉自己是部分盲目驾驶。”</blockquote> For better or worse, Jakab says, all of this has made Wall Street even better at making money.<blockquote>贾卡布说，无论好坏，所有这些都让华尔街更擅长赚钱。</blockquote> \"I think what's changed is that Wall Street is totally aware of what's going on,\" says Jakab. \"And they are not going to get caught out in the same way again. They monitor social media, they're going to be more judicious about getting exposed.\"<blockquote>“我认为改变的是华尔街完全意识到正在发生的事情，”贾卡布说。“他们不会再以同样的方式被抓到。他们监控社交媒体，他们会更加明智地暴露自己。”</blockquote> For all the so-called Apes accomplished, Jakab argues, in the end it was the little guy that got hosed in the GameStop saga. His book, \"The Revolution That Wasn't: GameStop, Reddit, and the Fleecing of Small Investors,\" Jakab makes the case that despite all the talk of sticking it to the Man, the rally only tipped the odds further in Wall Street's favor.<blockquote>贾卡布认为，对于所有所谓的类人猿来说，最终在《游戏驿站》传奇中被扫地出门的是小家伙。贾卡布在他的书《不是的革命：游戏驿站、Reddit和对小投资者的诈骗》中指出，尽管人们都在谈论坚持到底，但这次反弹只会进一步使华尔街的胜算对华尔街有利。</blockquote> \"Wall Street likes this,\" he told CNN Business. \"Wall Street likes millions of young people who hate Wall Street putting their money on Wall Street — they don't care if they're hated.\"<blockquote>“华尔街喜欢这样，”他告诉CNN商业频道。“华尔街喜欢数百万讨厌华尔街的年轻人把钱投入华尔街——他们不在乎自己是否被讨厌。”</blockquote> Perhaps the more significant legacy of WallStreetBets and the GME saga is cultural. Spend half a minute on the site and you quickly understand this isn't a convention of Boomers in suits but rather a bunch of young Millennials and Gen Zers (still mostly male) talking about complicated options trades via memes and emoji.<blockquote>也许WallStreetBets和GME传奇更重要的遗产是文化。在网站上花半分钟，你很快就会明白这不是西装革履的婴儿潮一代的惯例，而是一群年轻的千禧一代和Z世代（仍然以男性为主）通过模因和表情符号谈论复杂的期权交易。</blockquote> \"The best analogy that I can come up with is, you've had these seasoned professional poker players playing this game for decades, and now they've all had to scoot over to make room for this new player that doesn't use the same rules,\" Rogozinski says. \"You have somewhat of a reckless individual that has a different concept of risk and a different objective. And so these players now have to adjust their strategy.\"<blockquote>“我能想到的最好的类比是，这些经验丰富的职业扑克玩家已经玩了几十年了，现在他们都不得不快速移动，为这个不使用相同规则的新玩家腾出空间，”罗戈津斯基说。“你有一个有点鲁莽的人，他们有不同的风险概念和不同的目标。所以这些玩家现在必须调整他们的策略。”</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/19/investing/stocks-week-ahead-reddit-wallstreetbets-gamestop/index.html\">CNN Business</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","AMC":"AMC院线",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/19/investing/stocks-week-ahead-reddit-wallstreetbets-gamestop/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1197053463","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Nearly a year ago, a bunch of day traders from the fringes of the internet figured out how to beat Wall Street at its own game. Or so they thought.\nAround mid-January, shares of GameStop(GME) — a brick-and-mortar retailer that most analysts expected to go the way of Blockbuster — began surging, fueled by a pile-on of day traders from the WallStreetBets forum on Reddit. They were doubling, tripling, their positions by the day, chanting \"diamond hands,\" and \"to the moon,\" rally cries to hold onto their shares rather than cash out. The term \"meme stock\" sauntered into the mainstream.\nBetter still, these amateur traders, who winkingly referred to themselves as \"Apes,\" were sticking it to the fat cats on Wall Street who'd heavily shorted GameStop. The more people tried to dismiss the Reddit crowd — Citron Research called them \"the suckers at this poker game\" — the more they drove up the stock, squeezing the short sellers.\nIn the end, the GameStop rally sent the stock up 1,600% before coming back down to Earth. Citron, meanwhile, shut down its short-selling business after the episode. Melvin Capital, one of Wall Street's elite hedge funds, was so financially gutted it had to be bailed out by two other firms. The Apes rejoiced. Who's the sucker now?\nIt looked, in the moment, like David had taken down Goliath. But the giant was merely caught off guard.\nThe GameStop saga, brief though it was, marked a turning point for Wall Street. Did the Apes overthrow the establishment? No, far from it. But the spectacle of the uprising was every bit as important as the result. Once GameStop caught the public's imagination, Wall Street could no longer afford to dismiss social media or the investors who congregate on it.\n\"Most people saw it as this revolution,\" says Spencer Jakab, a Wall Street Journal columnist and author of a forthcoming book about the GameStop rally. \"And a lot of young people are still convinced that they're fighting some kind of virtuous fight against evil hedge funds... but, basically, the story is the same: If you think you've figured something out to beat Wall Street, you probably haven't.\"\nThe Reddit army's moment fizzled in early February when GameStop cratered to around $45. Those who joined late, buying the stock at its peak of around $480, were left with huge losses. These days, GME trades around $145 — up nearly 700% for the year, but far from January's highs.\nJaime Rogozinski, the founder of WallStreetBets, acknowledges that what happened with GameStop wasn't a revolution per se, but that doesn't mean the community or the ethos that guided it — sniffing out market inefficiencies and exploiting them for profit — is dead.\n\"They're little accounts, but they've now figured out how to push a stock price, even with their insignificant size,\" Rogozinski told CNN Business.  \"They're not going to stop looking for these things.\"\nThe original WallStreetBets page has more than doubled in size since the GME rally, going from about 5 million at the end of January to over 11 million now -- an explosion of popularity that's put off some early adherents who broke off to form new, more specialized investing groups on Reddit and elsewhere.\nSo who won, David or Goliath? Maybe both.\nThe force of the January squeeze was powerful enough to make even the stodgiest of Wall Street elite sit up and take notice. US regulators are paying close attention, too.\n\"You'll be hard-pressed to find a company that has over 100% short float now, right?\" Rogozinski says. In other words, no Wall Street firm with any sense wants to end up like Melvin, a titan that was squeezed so hard by the GameStop surge it lost 53% of its fund in under a month. If you massively short a stock and run up your exposure, you're putting a target on your back.\nWallStreetBets, with all its crude jargon and machismo, became a check on institutional investors who had perhaps gotten too cozy. Not wanting to be wrong twice, firms have hired social media managers and subscribed to services that monitor social chatter. JPMorgan, for one, is currently testing a new tool aimed at protecting clients from losses tied to meme stocks,Bloomberg reported earlier this month.\n\"If you don't have a clear view of what retail is up to, it feels like you're driving partially blind,\" Chris Berthe, JPMorgan's global co-head of cash equities trading, told Bloomberg.\nFor better or worse, Jakab says, all of this has made Wall Street even better at making money.\n\"I think what's changed is that Wall Street is totally aware of what's going on,\" says Jakab. \"And they are not going to get caught out in the same way again. They monitor social media, they're going to be more judicious about getting exposed.\"\nFor all the so-called Apes accomplished, Jakab argues, in the end it was the little guy that got hosed in the GameStop saga. His book, \"The Revolution That Wasn't: GameStop, Reddit, and the Fleecing of Small Investors,\" Jakab makes the case that despite all the talk of sticking it to the Man, the rally only tipped the odds further in Wall Street's favor.\n\"Wall Street likes this,\" he told CNN Business. \"Wall Street likes millions of young people who hate Wall Street putting their money on Wall Street — they don't care if they're hated.\"\nPerhaps the more significant legacy of WallStreetBets and the GME saga is cultural. Spend half a minute on the site and you quickly understand this isn't a convention of Boomers in suits but rather a bunch of young Millennials and Gen Zers (still mostly male) talking about complicated options trades via memes and emoji.\n\"The best analogy that I can come up with is, you've had these seasoned professional poker players playing this game for decades, and now they've all had to scoot over to make room for this new player that doesn't use the same rules,\" Rogozinski says. \"You have somewhat of a reckless individual that has a different concept of risk and a different objective. And so these players now have to adjust their strategy.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"GME":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3732,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":4,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/693070894"}