TLC88
2021-12-13
Ok
Supreme Court asks U.S. government for views on Bayer weedkiller case<blockquote>最高法院就拜耳除草剂案征求美国政府意见</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
3
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":604595906,"tweetId":"604595906","gmtCreate":1639409070206,"gmtModify":1639409785116,"author":{"id":3579644221346646,"idStr":"3579644221346646","authorId":3579644221346646,"authorIdStr":"3579644221346646","name":"TLC88","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70e92e6f93d89c4be15661304799bff0","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":28,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Ok</p></body></html>","text":"Ok","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/604595906","repostId":1120567981,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120567981","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639407851,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1120567981?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-13 23:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Supreme Court asks U.S. government for views on Bayer weedkiller case<blockquote>最高法院就拜耳除草剂案征求美国政府意见</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120567981","media":"Reuters","summary":"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked President Joe Biden's administration for its views on whether","content":"<p>The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked President Joe Biden's administration for its views on whether the justices should hear Bayer AG's(BAYGn.DE)bid to dismiss claims by customers who contend its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer, as the company seeks to avoid potentially billions of dollars in damages.</p><p><blockquote>美国最高法院周一询问总统乔·拜登政府对法官是否应该听取拜耳公司(BAYGn.DE)驳回客户声称其农达除草剂致癌的索赔的意见，因为该公司寻求避免潜在的数十亿美元损失。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer in August filed a petition with the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision that upheld $25 million in damages awarded to California resident Edwin Hardeman, a Roundup user who blamed his cancer on the German pharmaceutical and chemical giant's glyphosate-based weedkillers. The Supreme Court's decision on whether to take up the matter is being closely watched as Bayer maneuvers to limit its legal liability in thousands of cases.</p><p><blockquote>8月份，拜耳向最高法院提交了一份请愿书，要求推翻下级法院的一项裁决，该裁决维持了加州居民埃德温·哈德曼(Edwin Hardeman)2500万美元的赔偿金。埃德温·哈德曼是一名农达用户，他将自己的癌症归咎于这家德国制药和化工巨头的草甘膦除草剂。随着拜耳试图限制其在数千起案件中的法律责任，最高法院关于是否受理此事的决定正受到密切关注。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar in the coming months is due to file a brief expressing the administration's views.</p><p><blockquote>美国副检察长伊丽莎白·普雷洛加(Elizabeth Prelogar)将在未来几个月提交一份简报，表达政府的观点。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer has lost three appeals against verdicts that sided with users of Roundup, awarding them tens of millions of dollars each. The company has pinned hopes for relief on the conservative-majority Supreme Court, which has a reputation for being pro-business.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳在三次上诉中败诉了站在农达用户一边的判决，每人判给他们数千万美元。该公司将救济的希望寄托在保守派占多数的最高法院上，该法院以亲商而闻名。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer asked the Supreme Court to review the verdict in Hardeman's case, which was upheld by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in May. Hardeman had regularly used Roundup for 26 years at his home in northern California before being diagnosed with a form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳要求最高法院审查哈德曼案件的判决，总部位于旧金山的美国第九巡回上诉法院于5月维持了这一判决。在被诊断出患有一种非霍奇金淋巴瘤之前，哈德曼在北加州的家中经常使用农达26年。</blockquote></p><p> There are more than 25,000 related claims Bayer has not settled yet.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳尚未解决的相关索赔超过25,000起。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer, which also makes aspirin, Yasmin birth-control pills and the stroke prevention drug Xarelto among other products, has argued that the cancer claims over Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate go against sound science and product clearance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has upheld guidance that glyphosate is not carcinogenic and not a risk to public health when used as indicated on the label.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳还生产阿司匹林、Yasmin避孕药和中风预防药物Xarelto等产品，该公司辩称，农达及其活性成分草甘膦的癌症声明违背了健全的科学和美国环境保护局的产品许可。美国环保署坚持草甘膦的指导方针，即当按照标签上的指示使用时，草甘膦不会致癌，也不会对公众健康构成风险。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer has said it should not be penalized for marketing a product deemed safe by the EPA and on which the agency would not allow a cancer warning to be printed.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳表示，它不应该因为销售一种被美国环保署认为安全的产品而受到处罚，该机构不允许在该产品上印有癌症警告。</blockquote></p><p> The lawsuits against Bayer have said the company should have warned customers of the alleged cancer risk. Bayer wants the Supreme Court to find that the EPA label approval under a federal law called the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act preempts the \"failure to warn\" claims brought under state law.</p><p><blockquote>针对拜耳的诉讼称，该公司应该警告客户所谓的癌症风险。拜耳希望最高法院认定，根据一项名为《联邦杀虫剂、杀真菌剂和灭鼠剂法案》的联邦法律，环保局的标签批准优先于根据州法律提出的“未能警告”索赔。</blockquote></p><p> Roundup-related lawsuits have dogged Bayer since it acquired the brand as part of its $63 billion purchase of agricultural seeds and pesticides maker Monsanto in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>自2018年拜耳斥资630亿美元收购农业种子和农药制造商孟山都公司的一部分收购该品牌以来，与农达相关的诉讼一直困扰着拜耳。</blockquote></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Supreme Court asks U.S. government for views on Bayer weedkiller case<blockquote>最高法院就拜耳除草剂案征求美国政府意见</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSupreme Court asks U.S. government for views on Bayer weedkiller case<blockquote>最高法院就拜耳除草剂案征求美国政府意见</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Reuters</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-13 23:04</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked President Joe Biden's administration for its views on whether the justices should hear Bayer AG's(BAYGn.DE)bid to dismiss claims by customers who contend its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer, as the company seeks to avoid potentially billions of dollars in damages.</p><p><blockquote>美国最高法院周一询问总统乔·拜登政府对法官是否应该听取拜耳公司(BAYGn.DE)驳回客户声称其农达除草剂致癌的索赔的意见，因为该公司寻求避免潜在的数十亿美元损失。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer in August filed a petition with the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision that upheld $25 million in damages awarded to California resident Edwin Hardeman, a Roundup user who blamed his cancer on the German pharmaceutical and chemical giant's glyphosate-based weedkillers. The Supreme Court's decision on whether to take up the matter is being closely watched as Bayer maneuvers to limit its legal liability in thousands of cases.</p><p><blockquote>8月份，拜耳向最高法院提交了一份请愿书，要求推翻下级法院的一项裁决，该裁决维持了加州居民埃德温·哈德曼(Edwin Hardeman)2500万美元的赔偿金。埃德温·哈德曼是一名农达用户，他将自己的癌症归咎于这家德国制药和化工巨头的草甘膦除草剂。随着拜耳试图限制其在数千起案件中的法律责任，最高法院关于是否受理此事的决定正受到密切关注。</blockquote></p><p> U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar in the coming months is due to file a brief expressing the administration's views.</p><p><blockquote>美国副检察长伊丽莎白·普雷洛加(Elizabeth Prelogar)将在未来几个月提交一份简报，表达政府的观点。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer has lost three appeals against verdicts that sided with users of Roundup, awarding them tens of millions of dollars each. The company has pinned hopes for relief on the conservative-majority Supreme Court, which has a reputation for being pro-business.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳在三次上诉中败诉了站在农达用户一边的判决，每人判给他们数千万美元。该公司将救济的希望寄托在保守派占多数的最高法院上，该法院以亲商而闻名。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer asked the Supreme Court to review the verdict in Hardeman's case, which was upheld by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in May. Hardeman had regularly used Roundup for 26 years at his home in northern California before being diagnosed with a form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳要求最高法院审查哈德曼案件的判决，总部位于旧金山的美国第九巡回上诉法院于5月维持了这一判决。在被诊断出患有一种非霍奇金淋巴瘤之前，哈德曼在北加州的家中经常使用农达26年。</blockquote></p><p> There are more than 25,000 related claims Bayer has not settled yet.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳尚未解决的相关索赔超过25,000起。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer, which also makes aspirin, Yasmin birth-control pills and the stroke prevention drug Xarelto among other products, has argued that the cancer claims over Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate go against sound science and product clearance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has upheld guidance that glyphosate is not carcinogenic and not a risk to public health when used as indicated on the label.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳还生产阿司匹林、Yasmin避孕药和中风预防药物Xarelto等产品，该公司辩称，农达及其活性成分草甘膦的癌症声明违背了健全的科学和美国环境保护局的产品许可。美国环保署坚持草甘膦的指导方针，即当按照标签上的指示使用时，草甘膦不会致癌，也不会对公众健康构成风险。</blockquote></p><p> Bayer has said it should not be penalized for marketing a product deemed safe by the EPA and on which the agency would not allow a cancer warning to be printed.</p><p><blockquote>拜耳表示，它不应该因为销售一种被美国环保署认为安全的产品而受到处罚，该机构不允许在该产品上印有癌症警告。</blockquote></p><p> The lawsuits against Bayer have said the company should have warned customers of the alleged cancer risk. Bayer wants the Supreme Court to find that the EPA label approval under a federal law called the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act preempts the \"failure to warn\" claims brought under state law.</p><p><blockquote>针对拜耳的诉讼称，该公司应该警告客户所谓的癌症风险。拜耳希望最高法院认定，根据一项名为《联邦杀虫剂、杀真菌剂和灭鼠剂法案》的联邦法律，环保局的标签批准优先于根据州法律提出的“未能警告”索赔。</blockquote></p><p> Roundup-related lawsuits have dogged Bayer since it acquired the brand as part of its $63 billion purchase of agricultural seeds and pesticides maker Monsanto in 2018.</p><p><blockquote>自2018年拜耳斥资630亿美元收购农业种子和农药制造商孟山都公司的一部分收购该品牌以来，与农达相关的诉讼一直困扰着拜耳。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/supreme-court-asks-us-government-views-bayer-weedkiller-case-2021-12-13/\">Reuters</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BAYRY":"Bayer A.G."},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/supreme-court-asks-us-government-views-bayer-weedkiller-case-2021-12-13/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120567981","content_text":"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday asked President Joe Biden's administration for its views on whether the justices should hear Bayer AG's(BAYGn.DE)bid to dismiss claims by customers who contend its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer, as the company seeks to avoid potentially billions of dollars in damages.\nBayer in August filed a petition with the Supreme Court to reverse a lower court decision that upheld $25 million in damages awarded to California resident Edwin Hardeman, a Roundup user who blamed his cancer on the German pharmaceutical and chemical giant's glyphosate-based weedkillers. The Supreme Court's decision on whether to take up the matter is being closely watched as Bayer maneuvers to limit its legal liability in thousands of cases.\nU.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar in the coming months is due to file a brief expressing the administration's views.\nBayer has lost three appeals against verdicts that sided with users of Roundup, awarding them tens of millions of dollars each. The company has pinned hopes for relief on the conservative-majority Supreme Court, which has a reputation for being pro-business.\nBayer asked the Supreme Court to review the verdict in Hardeman's case, which was upheld by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in May. Hardeman had regularly used Roundup for 26 years at his home in northern California before being diagnosed with a form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.\nThere are more than 25,000 related claims Bayer has not settled yet.\nBayer, which also makes aspirin, Yasmin birth-control pills and the stroke prevention drug Xarelto among other products, has argued that the cancer claims over Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate go against sound science and product clearance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has upheld guidance that glyphosate is not carcinogenic and not a risk to public health when used as indicated on the label.\nBayer has said it should not be penalized for marketing a product deemed safe by the EPA and on which the agency would not allow a cancer warning to be printed.\nThe lawsuits against Bayer have said the company should have warned customers of the alleged cancer risk. Bayer wants the Supreme Court to find that the EPA label approval under a federal law called the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act preempts the \"failure to warn\" claims brought under state law.\nRoundup-related lawsuits have dogged Bayer since it acquired the brand as part of its $63 billion purchase of agricultural seeds and pesticides maker Monsanto in 2018.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BAYRY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2685,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/604595906"}
精彩评论