GinOng
2021-12-09
State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple
Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与 Epic Games 的一轮付款战</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":602582271,"tweetId":"602582271","gmtCreate":1639041778284,"gmtModify":1639042771890,"author":{"id":3585489224255758,"idStr":"3585489224255758","authorId":3585489224255758,"authorIdStr":"3585489224255758","name":"GinOng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbc4f4af938fe9cbc71173da2486f50b","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":22,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p> State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p> State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple</p></body></html>","text":"State of Play of Intelligent Automation will add buzz to Apple","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602582271","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与 Epic Games 的一轮付款战</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在与《堡垒之夜》发行商 Epic Games 的斗争中取得了胜利，美国第九巡回上诉法院的三名法官组成的合议庭在上诉期间暂缓执行下级法院的一项命令，该命令将使软件开发商更容易绕过苹果的支付系统进行游戏内购买。</blockquote></p><p> The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p><p><blockquote>巡回法院周三的裁决特别针对美国地方法院法官伊冯娜-冈萨雷斯-罗杰斯（Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers）于 9 月 10 日在 Epic 起诉苹果运营 App Store 的方式一案中发布的永久禁令中的一个要素。该条款禁止苹果阻止开发者在其应用程序中包含有关如何在不通过应用程序购买的情况下进行购买的信息，从而给苹果一个机会。</blockquote></p><p> In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p><p><blockquote>在这份长达两页的判决书中，巡回法院认为，苹果 “至少已经证明，其上诉对地区法院认定 Epic Games.未能证明苹果的行为违反了任何反垄断法，但确实证明了同样的行为违反了加州的不正当竞争法”。法院指出，另一项裁决认为这样的调查结果是矛盾的--如果你得出结论认为该行为不是对贸易的不合理限制，那么你也不能辩称它对消费者不公平。</blockquote></p><p> The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p><p><blockquote>法院还表示，苹果已经 “充分证明了无法弥补的伤害”，其余因素都支持维持下级法院禁令的规定，并在上诉前维持现状。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p><p><blockquote>苹果表示对这一裁决感到满意。“该公司在一份声明中说：”我们担心这些变化会带来新的隐私和安全风险，并扰乱用户喜爱的 App Store 用户体验。“我们要感谢法院在上诉程序继续进行期间批准暂缓执行”。</blockquote></p><p> Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p><p><blockquote>Evercore ISI 分析师 Amit Daryanani 在一份研究报告中表示，最新裁决允许苹果避开周四遵守该命令的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> “Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p><p><blockquote>“这位分析师写道：”获得暂缓许可对苹果来说是一个胜利，因为该公司被迫允许开发者在应用内加入其他支付平台链接的可能性已经被排除在外。“不过，我们注意到，上诉程序的总体结果仍不确定”。</blockquote></p><p> The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p><p><blockquote>该裁决由巡回法院法官 Diarmuid O'Scannlain、Sidney Thomas 和 Richard Tallman 做出。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在周三交易中上涨 2.3%，创下 175.08 美元的收盘新高。这使得该公司的市值达到 2.87 万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与 Epic Games 的一轮付款战</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与 Epic Games 的一轮付款战</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-09 16:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在与《堡垒之夜》发行商 Epic Games 的斗争中取得了胜利，美国第九巡回上诉法院的三名法官组成的合议庭在上诉期间暂缓执行下级法院的一项命令，该命令将使软件开发商更容易绕过苹果的支付系统进行游戏内购买。</blockquote></p><p> The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p><p><blockquote>巡回法院周三的裁决特别针对美国地方法院法官伊冯娜-冈萨雷斯-罗杰斯（Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers）于 9 月 10 日在 Epic 起诉苹果运营 App Store 的方式一案中发布的永久禁令中的一个要素。该条款禁止苹果阻止开发者在其应用程序中包含有关如何在不通过应用程序购买的情况下进行购买的信息，从而给苹果一个机会。</blockquote></p><p> In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p><p><blockquote>在这份长达两页的判决书中，巡回法院认为，苹果 “至少已经证明，其上诉对地区法院认定 Epic Games.未能证明苹果的行为违反了任何反垄断法，但确实证明了同样的行为违反了加州的不正当竞争法”。法院指出，另一项裁决认为这样的调查结果是矛盾的--如果你得出结论认为该行为不是对贸易的不合理限制，那么你也不能辩称它对消费者不公平。</blockquote></p><p> The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p><p><blockquote>法院还表示，苹果已经 “充分证明了无法弥补的伤害”，其余因素都支持维持下级法院禁令的规定，并在上诉前维持现状。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p><p><blockquote>苹果表示对这一裁决感到满意。“该公司在一份声明中说：”我们担心这些变化会带来新的隐私和安全风险，并扰乱用户喜爱的 App Store 用户体验。“我们要感谢法院在上诉程序继续进行期间批准暂缓执行”。</blockquote></p><p> Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p><p><blockquote>Evercore ISI 分析师 Amit Daryanani 在一份研究报告中表示，最新裁决允许苹果避开周四遵守该命令的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> “Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p><p><blockquote>“这位分析师写道：”获得暂缓许可对苹果来说是一个胜利，因为该公司被迫允许开发者在应用内加入其他支付平台链接的可能性已经被排除在外。“不过，我们注意到，上诉程序的总体结果仍不确定”。</blockquote></p><p> The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p><p><blockquote>该裁决由巡回法院法官 Diarmuid O'Scannlain、Sidney Thomas 和 Richard Tallman 做出。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在周三交易中上涨 2.3%，创下 175.08 美元的收盘新高。这使得该公司的市值达到 2.87 万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3626,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["INS","AAPL","STT"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":52,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/602582271"}
精彩评论