Jliang
2021-12-09
Please like
Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与Epic Games的一轮支付大战</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
2
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":602514632,"tweetId":"602514632","gmtCreate":1639040890688,"gmtModify":1639040896608,"author":{"id":3578105588635717,"idStr":"3578105588635717","authorId":3578105588635717,"authorIdStr":"3578105588635717","name":"Jliang","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":24,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Please like</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Please like</p></body></html>","text":"Please like","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/602514632","repostId":1147616327,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147616327","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1639039969,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147616327?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-09 16:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与Epic Games的一轮支付大战</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147616327","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge pan","content":"<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在与堡垒之夜发行商Epic Games的斗争中取得了胜利，美国第九巡回上诉法院的三名法官小组发布了一项暂缓执行下级法院的命令，等待上诉，该命令将使软件开发商更容易绕过苹果的支付系统进行游戏内购买。</blockquote></p><p> The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p><p><blockquote>周三巡回法院的裁决专门针对美国地方法院法官Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers于9月10日在Epic针对苹果运营App Store的方式提起的诉讼中发布的永久禁令的一项内容。该条款禁止苹果阻止开发者在其应用程序中包含有关如何在不通过应用程序购买的情况下进行购买的信息，从而向苹果提供提成。</blockquote></p><p> In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p><p><blockquote>在这份长达两页的裁决中，巡回法院发现，苹果“至少表明，其上诉对地区法院的裁决提出了严重质疑，即Epic Games……未能证明苹果的行为违反了任何反垄断法，但确实表明同样的行为违反了加州的不正当竞争法。”法院指出了另一项裁决，该裁决发现这样的发现是矛盾的——如果你得出结论认为该行为不是不合理的贸易限制，那么你就不能也认为它对消费者不公平。</blockquote></p><p> The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p><p><blockquote>法院还表示，苹果已经“充分证明了不可挽回的伤害”，其余因素有利于暂停下级法院禁令的规定，并在上诉期间维持现状。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p><p><blockquote>苹果表示对这一裁决感到满意。该公司在一份声明中表示：“我们担心这些变化会带来新的隐私和安全风险，并破坏客户喜欢App Store的用户体验。”“我们要感谢法院在上诉程序继续进行期间批准暂缓执行。”</blockquote></p><p> Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p><p><blockquote>Evercore ISI分析师Amit Daryanani在一份研究报告中表示，最新裁决允许苹果避开周四遵守该命令的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> “Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师写道：“获得暂缓令对苹果来说是一场胜利，因为该公司被迫允许开发者在应用内包含指向其他支付平台的链接的可能性已经被排除。”“然而，我们注意到，上诉程序的整体结果仍然不确定。”</blockquote></p><p> The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p><p><blockquote>该裁决由巡回法院法官Diarmuid O’Scannlain、Sidney Thomas和Richard Tallman发布。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在周三交易中上涨2.3%，创下收盘新高175.08美元。这使得该公司的市值达到2.87万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与Epic Games的一轮支付大战</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Wins a Round in Payments Fight With Epic Games<blockquote>苹果赢得了与Epic Games的一轮支付大战</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">Barrons</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-12-09 16:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.</p><p><blockquote>苹果在与堡垒之夜发行商Epic Games的斗争中取得了胜利，美国第九巡回上诉法院的三名法官小组发布了一项暂缓执行下级法院的命令，等待上诉，该命令将使软件开发商更容易绕过苹果的支付系统进行游戏内购买。</blockquote></p><p> The circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.</p><p><blockquote>周三巡回法院的裁决专门针对美国地方法院法官Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers于9月10日在Epic针对苹果运营App Store的方式提起的诉讼中发布的永久禁令的一项内容。该条款禁止苹果阻止开发者在其应用程序中包含有关如何在不通过应用程序购买的情况下进行购买的信息，从而向苹果提供提成。</blockquote></p><p> In the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.</p><p><blockquote>在这份长达两页的裁决中，巡回法院发现，苹果“至少表明，其上诉对地区法院的裁决提出了严重质疑，即Epic Games……未能证明苹果的行为违反了任何反垄断法，但确实表明同样的行为违反了加州的不正当竞争法。”法院指出了另一项裁决，该裁决发现这样的发现是矛盾的——如果你得出结论认为该行为不是不合理的贸易限制，那么你就不能也认为它对消费者不公平。</blockquote></p><p> The court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.</p><p><blockquote>法院还表示，苹果已经“充分证明了不可挽回的伤害”，其余因素有利于暂停下级法院禁令的规定，并在上诉期间维持现状。</blockquote></p><p> Apple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”</p><p><blockquote>苹果表示对这一裁决感到满意。该公司在一份声明中表示：“我们担心这些变化会带来新的隐私和安全风险，并破坏客户喜欢App Store的用户体验。”“我们要感谢法院在上诉程序继续进行期间批准暂缓执行。”</blockquote></p><p> Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.</p><p><blockquote>Evercore ISI分析师Amit Daryanani在一份研究报告中表示，最新裁决允许苹果避开周四遵守该命令的最后期限。</blockquote></p><p> “Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”</p><p><blockquote>这位分析师写道：“获得暂缓令对苹果来说是一场胜利，因为该公司被迫允许开发者在应用内包含指向其他支付平台的链接的可能性已经被排除。”“然而，我们注意到，上诉程序的整体结果仍然不确定。”</blockquote></p><p> The ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.</p><p><blockquote>该裁决由巡回法院法官Diarmuid O’Scannlain、Sidney Thomas和Richard Tallman发布。</blockquote></p><p> Apple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.</p><p><blockquote>苹果股价在周三交易中上涨2.3%，创下收盘新高175.08美元。这使得该公司的市值达到2.87万亿美元。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST\">Barrons</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-epic-games-in-app-payments-51639002173?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147616327","content_text":"Apple notched a victory in its battle with the Fortnite publisher Epic Games, when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a stay, pending appeal, of a lower court’s order that would make it easier for software developers to route around Apple’s payment system for in-game purchases.\nThe circuit-court decision on Wednesday specifically targets one element of a permanent injunction issued Sept. 10 by U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Epic’s lawsuit against Apple over the way it operates the App Store. That provision barred Apple from stopping developers from including in their apps information on how to make purchases without buying via the app and therefore giving a cut to Apple.\nIn the two-page decision, the circuit court found that Apple “has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises serious questions on the merits of the district court’s determination that Epic Games … failed to show Apple’s conduct violated any antitrust laws but did show that the same conduct violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.” The court pointed to another decision that found that such a finding was contradictory—that if you conclude that conduct is not an unreasonable restraint of trade, then you can’t also argue that it is unfair to consumers.\nThe court also said Apple has “made a sufficient showing of irreparable harm,” and that the remaining factors weighed in favor of staying the provision of the lower-court injunction and maintaining the status quo pending appeal.\nApple said it was pleased with the ruling. “Our concern is that these changes would have created new privacy and security risks, and disrupted the user experience customers love about the App Store,” it said in a statement. “We want to thank the court for granting this stay while the appeals process continues.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the latest ruling allows Apple to avoid a Thursday deadline for complying with the order.\n“Being granted a stay is a win for Apple, as the possibility of the company being forced to allow developers to include in-app links to other payment platforms has been pushed out,” the analyst wrote. “We would note, however, that the overall appeals process outcome remains uncertain.”\nThe ruling was issued by Circuit Court Judges Diarmuid O’Scannlain, Sidney Thomas and Richard Tallman.\nApple shares rallied 2.3% in Wednesday trading, hitting a new closing high of $175.08. That lifted the company’s market capitalization to $2.87 trillion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":594,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"CN","currentLanguage":"CN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":10,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ZH_CN"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/602514632"}
精彩评论