Ok_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":357613237,"tweetId":"357613237","gmtCreate":1617266590729,"gmtModify":1634521716228,"author":{"id":3572312712757258,"idStr":"3572312712757258","authorId":3572312712757258,"authorIdStr":"3572312712757258","name":"HUATkueh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/936c7c3c568dece3e2a6ae1a4510ab73","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":17,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Ok</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Ok</body></html>","text":"Ok","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/357613237","repostId":1176034429,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176034429","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617265621,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1176034429?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-01 16:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Prepare For 3 Things: Big Government, Huge Boondoggles, Massive Taxes<blockquote>为三件事做好准备：大政府、巨大的无用功、巨额税收</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176034429","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Progressives have their eyes on on your wallet to pay for their big government schemes. And it looks","content":"Progressives have their eyes on on your wallet to pay for their big government schemes. And it looks like Biden will oblige them.<blockquote>进步人士盯着你的钱包，为他们的大政府计划买单。看起来拜登会满足他们的要求。</blockquote> $10 Trillion for Climate and Infrastructure<blockquote>10万亿美元用于气候和基础设施</blockquote> The National Review reports Liberal Senators Push Biden for a&nbsp;$10 Trillion Climate and Infrastructure Bill<blockquote>《国家评论》报道自由党参议员推动拜登提出 10 万亿美元的气候和基础设施法案</blockquote> On Monday, Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) unveiled a climate and infrastructure plan that called for $10 trillion in spending over the next decade. Biden’s initial campaign pledge to invest $2 trillion over four years was already inadequate to confronting climate change, and his coming proposal may be even less so, said Robert Pollin, an economist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, who helped craft the Markey-Dingell plan. Pollin said a $3 trillion investment only amounted to about 1.3 percent of America’s gross domestic product.To put the $10 trillion Markey and Dingell are proposing in perspective, over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office&nbsp;expects&nbsp;that we’ll spend $1.4 trillion on veterans’ programs, $6 trillion on Medicaid, $8.5 trillion on defense, and $8 trillion on all other non-defense discretionary spending. The Markey-Dingell bill would be higher than any of these parts of the budget, only it would come on top of all of these existing expenditures. Biden's Big Plans<blockquote>周一，参议员爱德华·J·马基（马萨诸塞州民主党）。）和众议员黛比·丁格尔（密歇根州民主党）公布了一项气候和基础设施计划，要求在未来十年内支出10万亿美元。帮助制定马基-丁格尔计划的马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校经济学家罗伯特-波林（Robert Pollin）说，拜登最初的竞选承诺是在四年内投资2万亿美元，这已经不足以应对气候变化，他即将提出的建议可能更不足以应对气候变化。波林说，3万亿美元的投资仅占美国国内生产总值的1.3%左右。从马基和丁格尔提出的 10 万亿美元的角度来看，国会预算办公室预计，在未来十年中，我们将在退伍军人计划上花费 1.4 万亿美元，在医疗补助上花费 6 万亿美元，在国防上花费 8.5 万亿美元，在所有其他非国防可自由支配支出上花费 8 万亿美元。马基-丁格尔法案将高于预算的这些部分，只是它将建立在所有这些现有支出之上。拜登的大计划</blockquote> The Wall Street Journal comments&nbsp;Behind Biden’s Big Plans: Belief That Government Can Drive Growth<blockquote>《华尔街日报》评论拜登的大计划： 相信政府能够推动经济增长</blockquote> The Biden economic team’s ambitions go beyond size to scope. The centerpiece of their program—a multitrillion-dollar proposal to be rolled out starting Wednesday, less than a month after a $1.9 trillion stimulus—seeks to give Washington a new commercial role in matters ranging from charging stations for electric vehicles to child care, and more responsibility for underwriting education, incomes and higher-paying jobs.The administration has also laid the groundwork for regulations aimed at empowering labor unions, restricting big businesses from dominating their markets and prodding banks to lend more to minorities and less for fossil-fuel projects. All while federal debt is currently at a level not seen since World War II.It all marks a major turning point for economic policy. The gamble underlying the agenda is a belief that government can be a primary driver for growth. It’s an attempt to recalibrate assumptions that have shaped economic policy of both parties since the 1980s: that the public sector is inherently less efficient than the private, and bureaucrats should generally defer to markets.The administration’s sweeping plans reflect a calculation that “the risk of doing too little outweighs the risk of doing too much,” said White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese. “We’re going to be unapologetic about that,” he said. “Government must be a powerful force for good in the lives of Americans.” Crazy Thinking<blockquote>拜登经济团队的野心超越了规模和范围。他们计划的核心是一项数万亿美元的提案，将于周三开始推出，距离 1.9 万亿美元的刺激计划不到一个月——旨在让华盛顿在从电动汽车充电站到儿童保育等一系列问题上发挥新的商业作用，并承担更多责任来保障教育、收入和高薪工作。政府还为旨在赋予工会权力的法规奠定了基础，限制大企业主导市场，并敦促银行向少数族裔提供更多贷款，减少对化石燃料项目的贷款。与此同时，联邦债务目前处于二战以来的最高水平。这一切都标志着经济政策的一个重大转折点。该议程背后的赌博是相信政府可以成为增长的主要驱动力。这是试图重新调整自 20 世纪 80 年代以来塑造两党经济政策的假设：公共部门的效率本来就低于私营部门，官僚们通常应该服从市场。白宫国家经济委员会主任布莱恩-迪斯（Brian Deese）说，政府的全面计划反映了一种计算，即 “做得太少的风险大于做得太多的风险”。“他说：”我们不会对此表示歉意。“政府必须成为改善美国人生活的强大力量”。疯狂思考</blockquote> If you think this is crazy, you are thinking correctly.<blockquote>如果你认为这是疯狂的，你想的是对的。</blockquote> If you don't think this is crazy, you are crazy.<blockquote>如果你不觉得这很疯狂，那你就是疯了。</blockquote> The notion that government can spend money wisely and allocate resources wisely has been disproved countless times.<blockquote>政府可以把钱花在刀刃上，把资源用在刀刃上，这种观念已经被无数次推翻了。</blockquote> Take a look at Soviet 5-year plans, Venezuela, Japan for the last three decades, or dozens of other examples.<blockquote>看看苏联的五年计划、委内瑞拉、日本过去三十年的计划，或者其他几十个例子。</blockquote> A Word About Capitalism<blockquote>关于资本主义的一个词</blockquote> The saving grace of capitalism is failure. Good ideas are rewarded, bad ideas fail.<blockquote>资本主义的可取之处是失败。好主意有回报，坏主意失败。</blockquote> We don't have failure, we have bank bailouts, student loan bailouts, housing bailouts, and so many moral hazard market interventions by the Fed and Congress I cannot even name all the facilities or tools.<blockquote>我们没有失败，我们有银行救助、学生贷款救助、住房救助，以及美联储和国会如此多的道德风险市场干预，我甚至说不出所有的设施或工具。</blockquote> And without failure, you don't have capitalism.&nbsp;So don't tell me that we need big government because capitalism doesn't work.<blockquote>没有失败，你就没有资本主义。所以不要告诉我我们需要大政府，因为资本主义行不通。</blockquote> The problem is lack of capitalism not a failure of capitalism. Governments fail and ideas fail, capitalism doesn't fail.<blockquote>问题是缺乏资本主义，而不是资本主义的失败。政府失败，思想失败，资本主义不会失败。</blockquote> Regardless, more big government ideas are about to be tested.<blockquote>无论如何，更多的大政府想法即将受到考验。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Prepare For 3 Things: Big Government, Huge Boondoggles, Massive Taxes<blockquote>为三件事做好准备：大政府、巨大的无用功、巨额税收</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPrepare For 3 Things: Big Government, Huge Boondoggles, Massive Taxes<blockquote>为三件事做好准备：大政府、巨大的无用功、巨额税收</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-04-01 16:27\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nProgressives have their eyes on on your wallet to pay for their big government schemes. And it looks like Biden will oblige them.<blockquote>进步人士盯着你的钱包，为他们的大政府计划买单。看起来拜登会满足他们的要求。</blockquote> $10 Trillion for Climate and Infrastructure<blockquote>10万亿美元用于气候和基础设施</blockquote> The National Review reports Liberal Senators Push Biden for a&nbsp;$10 Trillion Climate and Infrastructure Bill<blockquote>《国家评论》报道自由党参议员推动拜登提出 10 万亿美元的气候和基础设施法案</blockquote> On Monday, Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) unveiled a climate and infrastructure plan that called for $10 trillion in spending over the next decade. Biden’s initial campaign pledge to invest $2 trillion over four years was already inadequate to confronting climate change, and his coming proposal may be even less so, said Robert Pollin, an economist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, who helped craft the Markey-Dingell plan. Pollin said a $3 trillion investment only amounted to about 1.3 percent of America’s gross domestic product.To put the $10 trillion Markey and Dingell are proposing in perspective, over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office&nbsp;expects&nbsp;that we’ll spend $1.4 trillion on veterans’ programs, $6 trillion on Medicaid, $8.5 trillion on defense, and $8 trillion on all other non-defense discretionary spending. The Markey-Dingell bill would be higher than any of these parts of the budget, only it would come on top of all of these existing expenditures. Biden's Big Plans<blockquote>周一，参议员爱德华·J·马基（马萨诸塞州民主党）。）和众议员黛比·丁格尔（密歇根州民主党）公布了一项气候和基础设施计划，要求在未来十年内支出10万亿美元。帮助制定马基-丁格尔计划的马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校经济学家罗伯特-波林（Robert Pollin）说，拜登最初的竞选承诺是在四年内投资2万亿美元，这已经不足以应对气候变化，他即将提出的建议可能更不足以应对气候变化。波林说，3万亿美元的投资仅占美国国内生产总值的1.3%左右。从马基和丁格尔提出的 10 万亿美元的角度来看，国会预算办公室预计，在未来十年中，我们将在退伍军人计划上花费 1.4 万亿美元，在医疗补助上花费 6 万亿美元，在国防上花费 8.5 万亿美元，在所有其他非国防可自由支配支出上花费 8 万亿美元。马基-丁格尔法案将高于预算的这些部分，只是它将建立在所有这些现有支出之上。拜登的大计划</blockquote> The Wall Street Journal comments&nbsp;Behind Biden’s Big Plans: Belief That Government Can Drive Growth<blockquote>《华尔街日报》评论拜登的大计划： 相信政府能够推动经济增长</blockquote> The Biden economic team’s ambitions go beyond size to scope. The centerpiece of their program—a multitrillion-dollar proposal to be rolled out starting Wednesday, less than a month after a $1.9 trillion stimulus—seeks to give Washington a new commercial role in matters ranging from charging stations for electric vehicles to child care, and more responsibility for underwriting education, incomes and higher-paying jobs.The administration has also laid the groundwork for regulations aimed at empowering labor unions, restricting big businesses from dominating their markets and prodding banks to lend more to minorities and less for fossil-fuel projects. All while federal debt is currently at a level not seen since World War II.It all marks a major turning point for economic policy. The gamble underlying the agenda is a belief that government can be a primary driver for growth. It’s an attempt to recalibrate assumptions that have shaped economic policy of both parties since the 1980s: that the public sector is inherently less efficient than the private, and bureaucrats should generally defer to markets.The administration’s sweeping plans reflect a calculation that “the risk of doing too little outweighs the risk of doing too much,” said White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese. “We’re going to be unapologetic about that,” he said. “Government must be a powerful force for good in the lives of Americans.” Crazy Thinking<blockquote>拜登经济团队的野心超越了规模和范围。他们计划的核心是一项数万亿美元的提案，将于周三开始推出，距离 1.9 万亿美元的刺激计划不到一个月——旨在让华盛顿在从电动汽车充电站到儿童保育等一系列问题上发挥新的商业作用，并承担更多责任来保障教育、收入和高薪工作。政府还为旨在赋予工会权力的法规奠定了基础，限制大企业主导市场，并敦促银行向少数族裔提供更多贷款，减少对化石燃料项目的贷款。与此同时，联邦债务目前处于二战以来的最高水平。这一切都标志着经济政策的一个重大转折点。该议程背后的赌博是相信政府可以成为增长的主要驱动力。这是试图重新调整自 20 世纪 80 年代以来塑造两党经济政策的假设：公共部门的效率本来就低于私营部门，官僚们通常应该服从市场。白宫国家经济委员会主任布莱恩-迪斯（Brian Deese）说，政府的全面计划反映了一种计算，即 “做得太少的风险大于做得太多的风险”。“他说：”我们不会对此表示歉意。“政府必须成为改善美国人生活的强大力量”。疯狂思考</blockquote> If you think this is crazy, you are thinking correctly.<blockquote>如果你认为这是疯狂的，你想的是对的。</blockquote> If you don't think this is crazy, you are crazy.<blockquote>如果你不觉得这很疯狂，那你就是疯了。</blockquote> The notion that government can spend money wisely and allocate resources wisely has been disproved countless times.<blockquote>政府可以把钱花在刀刃上，把资源用在刀刃上，这种观念已经被无数次推翻了。</blockquote> Take a look at Soviet 5-year plans, Venezuela, Japan for the last three decades, or dozens of other examples.<blockquote>看看苏联的五年计划、委内瑞拉、日本过去三十年的计划，或者其他几十个例子。</blockquote> A Word About Capitalism<blockquote>关于资本主义的一个词</blockquote> The saving grace of capitalism is failure. Good ideas are rewarded, bad ideas fail.<blockquote>资本主义的可取之处是失败。好主意有回报，坏主意失败。</blockquote> We don't have failure, we have bank bailouts, student loan bailouts, housing bailouts, and so many moral hazard market interventions by the Fed and Congress I cannot even name all the facilities or tools.<blockquote>我们没有失败，我们有银行救助、学生贷款救助、住房救助，以及美联储和国会如此多的道德风险市场干预，我甚至说不出所有的设施或工具。</blockquote> And without failure, you don't have capitalism.&nbsp;So don't tell me that we need big government because capitalism doesn't work.<blockquote>没有失败，你就没有资本主义。所以不要告诉我我们需要大政府，因为资本主义行不通。</blockquote> The problem is lack of capitalism not a failure of capitalism. Governments fail and ideas fail, capitalism doesn't fail.<blockquote>问题是缺乏资本主义，而不是资本主义的失败。政府失败，思想失败，资本主义不会失败。</blockquote> Regardless, more big government ideas are about to be tested.<blockquote>无论如何，更多的大政府想法即将受到考验。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/prepare-3-things-big-government-huge-boondoggles-massive-taxes\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/prepare-3-things-big-government-huge-boondoggles-massive-taxes","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176034429","content_text":"Progressives have their eyes on on your wallet to pay for their big government schemes. And it looks like Biden will oblige them.\n$10 Trillion for Climate and Infrastructure\nThe National Review reports Liberal Senators Push Biden for a $10 Trillion Climate and Infrastructure Bill\n\n On Monday, Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) unveiled a climate and infrastructure plan that called for $10 trillion in spending over the next decade. Biden’s initial campaign pledge to invest $2 trillion over four years was already inadequate to confronting climate change, and his coming proposal may be even less so, said Robert Pollin, an economist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, who helped craft the Markey-Dingell plan. Pollin said a $3 trillion investment only amounted to about 1.3 percent of America’s gross domestic product.To put the $10 trillion Markey and Dingell are proposing in perspective, over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office expects that we’ll spend $1.4 trillion on veterans’ programs, $6 trillion on Medicaid, $8.5 trillion on defense, and $8 trillion on all other non-defense discretionary spending. The Markey-Dingell bill would be higher than any of these parts of the budget, only it would come on top of all of these existing expenditures.\n\nBiden's Big Plans\nThe Wall Street Journal comments Behind Biden’s Big Plans: Belief That Government Can Drive Growth\n\n The Biden economic team’s ambitions go beyond size to scope. The centerpiece of their program—a multitrillion-dollar proposal to be rolled out starting Wednesday, less than a month after a $1.9 trillion stimulus—seeks to give Washington a new commercial role in matters ranging from charging stations for electric vehicles to child care, and more responsibility for underwriting education, incomes and higher-paying jobs.The administration has also laid the groundwork for regulations aimed at empowering labor unions, restricting big businesses from dominating their markets and prodding banks to lend more to minorities and less for fossil-fuel projects. All while federal debt is currently at a level not seen since World War II.It all marks a major turning point for economic policy. The gamble underlying the agenda is a belief that government can be a primary driver for growth. It’s an attempt to recalibrate assumptions that have shaped economic policy of both parties since the 1980s: that the public sector is inherently less efficient than the private, and bureaucrats should generally defer to markets.The administration’s sweeping plans reflect a calculation that “the risk of doing too little outweighs the risk of doing too much,” said White House National Economic Council Director Brian Deese. “We’re going to be unapologetic about that,” he said. “Government must be a powerful force for good in the lives of Americans.”\n\nCrazy Thinking\nIf you think this is crazy, you are thinking correctly.\nIf you don't think this is crazy, you are crazy.\nThe notion that government can spend money wisely and allocate resources wisely has been disproved countless times.\nTake a look at Soviet 5-year plans, Venezuela, Japan for the last three decades, or dozens of other examples.\nA Word About Capitalism\nThe saving grace of capitalism is failure. Good ideas are rewarded, bad ideas fail.\nWe don't have failure, we have bank bailouts, student loan bailouts, housing bailouts, and so many moral hazard market interventions by the Fed and Congress I cannot even name all the facilities or tools.\nAnd without failure, you don't have capitalism. So don't tell me that we need big government because capitalism doesn't work.\nThe problem is lack of capitalism not a failure of capitalism. Governments fail and ideas fail, capitalism doesn't fail.\nRegardless, more big government ideas are about to be tested.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":539,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/357613237"}