Bump bump_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-03-19

Bump bump

Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让 SLR 救济到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":350192472,"tweetId":"350192472","gmtCreate":1616164729396,"gmtModify":1634526910377,"author":{"id":3576063635462913,"idStr":"3576063635462913","authorId":3576063635462913,"authorIdStr":"3576063635462913","name":"ExodusX","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":6,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Bump bump&nbsp;</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Bump bump&nbsp;</body></html>","text":"Bump bump","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/350192472","repostId":1199154789,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1199154789?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让 SLR 救济到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.<blockquote>正如这里所讨论和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦和谢罗德·布朗等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率（SLR）豁免如期于3月31日到期，即规则变更一周年纪念日。</blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"<blockquote>美联储银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于 COVID-19 事件，做出临时改变是为了让存款机构能够灵活地向家庭和企业提供信贷。纽约联储前大师佐尔坦-波萨尔（Zoltan Pozsar）（再次）正确预测了这一结果，他在联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）之后表示，“事实上，美联储做出这一调整实际上是先发制人的--o/n RRP工具目前没有被使用，因此还没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率还没有出现负值交易--这表明美联储正在为终止 SLR 豁免“铺平道路”.\"</blockquote>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:<blockquote>美联储深知这对市场来说将是一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，指出虽然 SLR 特殊待遇将于 3 月 31 日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众对几项潜在的 SLR 修改发表评论”，此外，“随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决 SLR 的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现可能制约经济增长和破坏金融稳定的压力“——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新推出 SLR：</blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...<blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变更不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。为了缓解新冠肺炎疫情造成的国债市场压力，并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。此后，国债市场趋于稳定。然而，由于最近央行储备供应和国债发行的增加，董事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现可能制约经济增长和破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保 SLR（作为额外资本要求于 2014 年设立）在储备较高的环境下仍然有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的 SLR 修改征求公众意见。该提案和意见将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来确保国债市场弹性的工作进行持续讨论。尽管美联储提出了宽慰的要求，在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌……</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...<blockquote>债券收益率飙升……</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...<blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是最容易受到SLR减免的银行（正如昨天在“面临摩根大通杠杆减免威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.<blockquote>....崩溃了。</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.<blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心 SLR 决定的原因：首先，对于那些阅读我们有关该问题的入门读物的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，摩根大通是一家因美联储的决定而损失最大的银行）底线是，如果没有 SLR 救济，银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按顺序），就像美联储正在向市场注入数千亿美元的储备随着财政部耗尽其 TGA 账户。</blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.<blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着联邦储备银行持有的银行存款也将大幅增长。监管救济的到期将使 8 个 GSIB 增加约 2.1 万亿美元的杠杆风险。此外，TGA 的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在 2021 年为系统增加约 2.35 万亿美元的存款。虽然 3 月 31 日豁免到期不会对 GSIB 产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增长将增加长期债务 (LTD) 和优先要求。在此，摩根大通持乐观态度并写道“即使是‘最坏’的案例发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD 需要 350 亿美元来满足 TLAC 要求，而优先需要 150 亿至 200 亿美元才能将全行业 SLR 的比例维持在 5.6%。</blockquote>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).<blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，以 6.2% 的 SLR 计算，增加杠杆风险的能力约为 7,650 亿美元。”高盛的做法更令人不安：该银行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，将出现约 2 万亿美元的储备能力缺口，主要以银行无法接受的存款形式作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对 SLR 困境的全面理解要多得多）。</blockquote>So what happens next?<blockquote>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</blockquote>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:<blockquote>昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm在谈到这个话题时写道：最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免…….以下是几个场景及其对回购市场的影响:</blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...<blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经全价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性增加。准备金和国库的豁免都结束了。同上。换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加……</blockquote>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:<blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？那么，上周摩根大通为SLR布局了5种情景，其中两种情景预测SLR救济将在3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"<blockquote>3.救助3月31日结束，银行全面募资对银行利率的影响前端利率4.救助3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆对银行利率的影响前端利率回到佐尔坦，让我们回顾一下，回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在 SLR 计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金存款和准备金（而不是国债），以留出更多空间进行做市活动，这些资金流动将进一步扩大 TGA 提款带来的货币资金流入。\"</blockquote>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.<blockquote>更重要的是，佐尔坦预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现大范围的混乱，而是对单反相机已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果被淘汰，将会产生）提供了更温和的观点，正如他在周二的一份报告中所解释的那样。</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"<blockquote>如何确定佐尔坦的良性观点是否正确？他在笔记的最后写道：“鉴于我们在 6 月底之前将 FRA-OIS 利差从零变为负的看涨期权是基于 SLR 延期结束，以及美联储将试图用价格而非数量来解决数量问题的假设，今天的调整意味着 FRA-OIS 不会一路跌至零或负区域”。</blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.<blockquote>从这里开始，FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易强度，但以远低于零的利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险……虽然法案偶尔会陷入负值区域，但到目前为止，它们已经避免了NIRP的全面暴跌，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极迹象，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote>* *&nbsp; *<blockquote>** *</blockquote>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.<blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇会对市场产生什么直接影响的人来说，NatWest 策略师布莱克-格温（Blake Gwinn）写道，美联储宣布将让银行的监管豁免在本月底到期，“确实穿针引线，并 “缓解了对市场潜在长期影响的担忧”。SLR“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”，承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止应变发展.</blockquote>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”<blockquote>“格温说：”我从来没有担心过银行会在一天之内抛售国债，或者在不续签的情况下提取回购或类似的事情。格温总结说，“我担心的是，从长远来看，”随着外汇储备的继续上升，SLR 是否会 “成为一种麻烦，拖累国债和利差”。“真正面对这些恐惧，基本上是在说，‘别担心，我们会做到的’。”</blockquote>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.<blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四巫交易中飙升至 HOD，市场似乎对美联储的任何行动都相当怀疑。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让 SLR 救济到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next<blockquote>美联储令市场失望，让 SLR 救济到期：接下来会发生什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nzerohedge2021-03-19 22:32\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nAs washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.<blockquote>正如这里所讨论和深入讨论的那样，在伊丽莎白·沃伦和谢罗德·布朗等进步民主党人的政治压力下，美联储决定让临时补充杠杆率（SLR）豁免如期于3月31日到期，即规则变更一周年纪念日。</blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"<blockquote>美联储银行监管机构今天宣布，2020年5月15日发布的存款机构补充杠杆率（SLR）临时变更将于2021年3月31日如期到期。鉴于 COVID-19 事件，做出临时改变是为了让存款机构能够灵活地向家庭和企业提供信贷。纽约联储前大师佐尔坦-波萨尔（Zoltan Pozsar）（再次）正确预测了这一结果，他在联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）之后表示，“事实上，美联储做出这一调整实际上是先发制人的--o/n RRP工具目前没有被使用，因此还没有能力限制，而回购和票据收益率还没有出现负值交易--这表明美联储正在为终止 SLR 豁免“铺平道路”.\"</blockquote>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:<blockquote>美联储深知这对市场来说将是一个非常热门的问题，因此发表了以下声明以缓解交易员的紧张情绪，指出虽然 SLR 特殊待遇将于 3 月 31 日到期，但美联储正在“邀请公众对几项潜在的 SLR 修改发表评论”，此外，“随着时间的推移，董事会可能需要解决 SLR 的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现可能制约经济增长和破坏金融稳定的压力“——简而言之，如果收益率飙升，美联储将立即重新推出 SLR：</blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...<blockquote>美联储周五宣布，银行控股公司补充杠杆率（SLR）的临时变化将于3月31日如期到期。此外，董事会将很快就调整SLR的措施征求意见。董事会将采取适当行动，确保SLR的任何变更不会削弱银行资本要求的整体实力。为了缓解新冠肺炎疫情造成的国债市场压力，并促进对家庭和企业的贷款，董事会去年暂时修改了SLR，将美国国债和央行储备排除在外。此后，国债市场趋于稳定。然而，由于最近央行储备供应和国债发行的增加，董事会可能需要随着时间的推移解决SLR的当前设计和校准问题，以防止出现可能制约经济增长和破坏金融稳定的压力。为了确保 SLR（作为额外资本要求于 2014 年设立）在储备较高的环境下仍然有效，董事会将很快就几项潜在的 SLR 修改征求公众意见。该提案和意见将有助于与财政部和其他监管机构就未来确保国债市场弹性的工作进行持续讨论。尽管美联储提出了宽慰的要求，在为有利的结果做好准备后，美联储令人失望的声明几乎不是交易员所希望的消息，股市暴跌……</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...<blockquote>债券收益率飙升……</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...<blockquote>...而摩根大通的股票是最容易受到SLR减免的银行（正如昨天在“面临摩根大通杠杆减免威胁”中所指出的）...</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.<blockquote>....崩溃了。</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.<blockquote>如果您一直生活在岩石下，以下是您应该关心 SLR 决定的原因：首先，对于那些阅读我们有关该问题的入门读物的人来说，摩根大通的一些背景（具有讽刺意味的是，摩根大通是一家因美联储的决定而损失最大的银行）底线是，如果没有 SLR 救济，银行可能不得不去杠杆化、筹集新资本、停止回购、出售优先股、拒绝存款并普遍减少准备金（不一定是所有这些，也不是按顺序），就像美联储正在向市场注入数千亿美元的储备随着财政部耗尽其 TGA 账户。</blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.<blockquote>美联储资产负债表的大幅扩张意味着联邦储备银行持有的银行存款也将大幅增长。监管救济的到期将使 8 个 GSIB 增加约 2.1 万亿美元的杠杆风险。此外，TGA 的减少和持续的量化宽松可能会在 2021 年为系统增加约 2.35 万亿美元的存款。虽然 3 月 31 日豁免到期不会对 GSIB 产生直接影响，但全年杠杆资产的持续增长将增加长期债务 (LTD) 和优先要求。在此，摩根大通持乐观态度并写道“即使是‘最坏’的案例发行情况也是非常可控的，LTD 需要 350 亿美元来满足 TLAC 要求，而优先需要 150 亿至 200 亿美元才能将全行业 SLR 的比例维持在 5.6%。</blockquote>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).<blockquote>银行实体的限制更大，以 6.2% 的 SLR 计算，增加杠杆风险的能力约为 7,650 亿美元。”高盛的做法更令人不安：该银行估计，在持续的量化宽松制度下，将出现约 2 万亿美元的储备能力缺口，主要以银行无法接受的存款形式作为正在进行的量化宽松的一部分（高盛对 SLR 困境的全面理解要多得多）。</blockquote>So what happens next?<blockquote>那么接下来会发生什么呢？</blockquote>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:<blockquote>昨天Curvature的Scott Skyrm在谈到这个话题时写道：最大的银行享有更大的资产负债表，但华盛顿有政治因素反对延长豁免…….以下是几个场景及其对回购市场的影响:</blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...<blockquote>豁免延长3个月或6个月——对回购市场没有影响。它已经全价了。准备金的豁免继续，但国债的豁免结束。由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性增加。准备金和国库的豁免都结束了。同上。换句话说，Skyrm持相对悲观的观点，警告称“由于大型银行是回购市场上最大的现金提供者，因此进入市场的现金减少，回购利率上升。”此外，随着回购资产从最大的银行转移到其他回购市场参与者，波动性可能会增加……</blockquote>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:<blockquote>也许有点太严厉了？那么，上周摩根大通为SLR布局了5种情景，其中两种情景预测SLR救济将在3月31日结束，具体如下：</blockquote>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"<blockquote>3.救助3月31日结束，银行全面募资对银行利率的影响前端利率4.救助3月31日结束，银行增资去杠杆对银行利率的影响前端利率回到佐尔坦，让我们回顾一下，回购大师还警告说，“结束准备金和国债在 SLR 计算中的豁免可能意味着美国银行将拒绝保证金存款和准备金（而不是国债），以留出更多空间进行做市活动，这些资金流动将进一步扩大 TGA 提款带来的货币资金流入。\"</blockquote>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.<blockquote>更重要的是，佐尔坦预计回购或更广泛的市场不会出现大范围的混乱，而是对单反相机已经产生的微不足道的影响（如果被淘汰，将会产生）提供了更温和的观点，正如他在周二的一份报告中所解释的那样。</blockquote><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"<blockquote>如何确定佐尔坦的良性观点是否正确？他在笔记的最后写道：“鉴于我们在 6 月底之前将 FRA-OIS 利差从零变为负的看涨期权是基于 SLR 延期结束，以及美联储将试图用价格而非数量来解决数量问题的假设，今天的调整意味着 FRA-OIS 不会一路跌至零或负区域”。</blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.<blockquote>从这里开始，FRA-OIS将取决于外汇掉期相对于OIS的交易强度，但以远低于零的利率交易的国库券不再是一种风险……虽然法案偶尔会陷入负值区域，但到目前为止，它们已经避免了NIRP的全面暴跌，这可能只是市场正在等待的积极迹象，以缓解与SLR豁免突然且基本上出乎意料的结束相关的紧张情绪。</blockquote>* *&nbsp; *<blockquote>** *</blockquote>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.<blockquote>最后，对于那些好奇会对市场产生什么直接影响的人来说，NatWest 策略师布莱克-格温（Blake Gwinn）写道，美联储宣布将让银行的监管豁免在本月底到期，“确实穿针引线，并 “缓解了对市场潜在长期影响的担忧”。SLR“结束了它，但化解了许多下意识的市场反应”，承诺解决补充杠杆率的当前设计和校准问题，以防止应变发展.</blockquote>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”<blockquote>“格温说：”我从来没有担心过银行会在一天之内抛售国债，或者在不续签的情况下提取回购或类似的事情。格温总结说，“我担心的是，从长远来看，”随着外汇储备的继续上升，SLR 是否会 “成为一种麻烦，拖累国债和利差”。“真正面对这些恐惧，基本上是在说，‘别担心，我们会做到的’。”</blockquote>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.<blockquote>好吧，随着收益率在早期四巫交易中飙升至 HOD，市场似乎对美联储的任何行动都相当怀疑。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">zerohedge</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":648,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":8,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/350192472"}