How about salary spike?_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-06-30

How about salary spike?

Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>通胀飙升对股市意味着什么</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":153970239,"tweetId":"153970239","gmtCreate":1625008066321,"gmtModify":1633946034706,"author":{"id":3554924249585989,"idStr":"3554924249585989","authorId":3554924249585989,"authorIdStr":"3554924249585989","name":"HYYOONG","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":13,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>How about salary spike?</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>How about salary spike?</body></html>","text":"How about salary spike?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/153970239","repostId":1180006824,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180006824","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624979545,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1180006824?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-06-29 23:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>通胀飙升对股市意味着什么</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180006824","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basi","content":"Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis<blockquote>对通胀对成长型和价值型股票的短期影响的预期没有历史依据</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11ddc0063c90ff3e9f3bfe11e8ad739\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"850\">AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES<blockquote>法新社/盖蒂图片社</blockquote> Don’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.<blockquote>不要指望最新的通胀数据来帮助你判断美国股市近期的涨跌。</blockquote> That’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.<blockquote>这一点值得牢记，因为根据最近的经验，你有理由认为通货膨胀在股市的短期波动中发挥着强大的作用。例如，在 4 月中旬至 5 月中旬的通胀恐慌期间，价值股的表现优于成长型股——正如传统观点所预期的那样。自5月中旬以来，通胀担忧有所消退，价值股表现滞后。</blockquote> It doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.<blockquote>事情并不总是这么顺利。事实上，我找不到通货膨胀的短期趋势与整个股市的表现或价值股和成长股的相对表现之间存在值得注意的历史关系。</blockquote> To search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.<blockquote>为了寻找这种相关性，我首先分析了耶鲁大学金融学教授罗伯特·席勒（Robert Shiller）从1871年开始的月度通货膨胀、利率和股市数据。我计算了从过去一个月到过去12个月的不同短期时期内通货膨胀和标普500之间的相关系数。</blockquote> I largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&amp;P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&amp;P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)<blockquote>我基本上是空的。考虑CPI的变化在多大程度上解释或预测了标普500的同时变化（通过一种称为r平方的统计方法来衡量）。无论 1 个月到 12 个月之间的时间跨度如何，自 1871 年以来，CPI（或其前身）预测的标普500波动幅度都不超过 4%。(请注意，在衡量这些相关性时，我关注的是标普500经通胀调整后的总回报率，以免影响我的计算）。</blockquote> One of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.<blockquote>缺乏强相关性的原因之一是股市与通货膨胀有着爱恨交织的关系。当投资者更担心经济疲软，甚至通货紧缩时，较高的通胀有时被视为一件好事。在其他时候，通货膨胀和股票是负相关的。</blockquote> This fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.<blockquote>下图说明了这种波动相关性，该图表跟踪了过去 12 个月 CPI 与标普500经通胀调整后的总回报率之间的相关系数。注意没有任何一致的关系。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12ac0cc9ed7a8d766f3308cbf6daeaf5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"882\"><blockquote></blockquote> As a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.<blockquote>作为对这一令人惊讶的结论的反复检查，我重新分析了利率而不是CPI。这一点很有启发性，因为利率不仅反映了近期通胀的变化，还反映了未来通胀的预期。利率短期变动与股市之间的相关性甚至比我关注通货膨胀时还要弱。</blockquote> Value vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise<blockquote>通货膨胀和利率上升时的价值与增长</blockquote> What about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?<blockquote>价值相对于增长的表现如何？从历史上看，它肯定遵循了我们在过去几个月中看到的同样模式？</blockquote> Not so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.<blockquote>不是这样的。为了得出这个违反直觉的结论，我分析了自 1926 年以来美国价值和成长型股票的月回报率，数据来自达特茅斯学院金融学教授肯·弗伦奇 (Ken French)。（具体来说，价值股票投资组合包含了美国市场 30% 的账面/市值比率最低，而成长型股票投资组合包含了 30% 的账面/市值比率最高。）当关注 1 至 12 个月的所有追踪时间段时，我发现通货膨胀与价值股和成长型股票的相对表现之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。</blockquote> Even more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.<blockquote>更令人惊讶的是，当我关注利率与价值相对于增长的表现之间的关系时，我发现了一种负相关关系。这与我们过去几个月所看到的情况恰恰相反，也与传统智慧教导我们的价值股在利率上升的环境中应该如何表现相反。</blockquote> My analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.<blockquote>我的分析并不表明投资者现在应该反其道而行之，在以前押注增长的时候押注价值，反之亦然。这一分析的要点是，通货膨胀和利率与股票市场和价值相对于增长的表现之间存在着一种不稳定且往往微不足道的历史关系。</blockquote> Short-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.<blockquote>短期股市计时器需要在其他地方寻找更有力的线索，以了解市场的走向。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>通胀飙升对股市意味着什么</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s what inflation’s spike means for stocks now<blockquote>通胀飙升对股市意味着什么</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMarketWatch2021-06-29 23:12\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nExpectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis<blockquote>对通胀对成长型和价值型股票的短期影响的预期没有历史依据</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11ddc0063c90ff3e9f3bfe11e8ad739\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"850\">AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES<blockquote>法新社/盖蒂图片社</blockquote> Don’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.<blockquote>不要指望最新的通胀数据来帮助你判断美国股市近期的涨跌。</blockquote> That’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.<blockquote>这一点值得牢记，因为根据最近的经验，你有理由认为通货膨胀在股市的短期波动中发挥着强大的作用。例如，在 4 月中旬至 5 月中旬的通胀恐慌期间，价值股的表现优于成长型股——正如传统观点所预期的那样。自5月中旬以来，通胀担忧有所消退，价值股表现滞后。</blockquote> It doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.<blockquote>事情并不总是这么顺利。事实上，我找不到通货膨胀的短期趋势与整个股市的表现或价值股和成长股的相对表现之间存在值得注意的历史关系。</blockquote> To search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.<blockquote>为了寻找这种相关性，我首先分析了耶鲁大学金融学教授罗伯特·席勒（Robert Shiller）从1871年开始的月度通货膨胀、利率和股市数据。我计算了从过去一个月到过去12个月的不同短期时期内通货膨胀和标普500之间的相关系数。</blockquote> I largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&amp;P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&amp;P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)<blockquote>我基本上是空的。考虑CPI的变化在多大程度上解释或预测了标普500的同时变化（通过一种称为r平方的统计方法来衡量）。无论 1 个月到 12 个月之间的时间跨度如何，自 1871 年以来，CPI（或其前身）预测的标普500波动幅度都不超过 4%。(请注意，在衡量这些相关性时，我关注的是标普500经通胀调整后的总回报率，以免影响我的计算）。</blockquote> One of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.<blockquote>缺乏强相关性的原因之一是股市与通货膨胀有着爱恨交织的关系。当投资者更担心经济疲软，甚至通货紧缩时，较高的通胀有时被视为一件好事。在其他时候，通货膨胀和股票是负相关的。</blockquote> This fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&amp;P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.<blockquote>下图说明了这种波动相关性，该图表跟踪了过去 12 个月 CPI 与标普500经通胀调整后的总回报率之间的相关系数。注意没有任何一致的关系。</blockquote> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12ac0cc9ed7a8d766f3308cbf6daeaf5\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"882\"><blockquote></blockquote> As a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.<blockquote>作为对这一令人惊讶的结论的反复检查，我重新分析了利率而不是CPI。这一点很有启发性，因为利率不仅反映了近期通胀的变化，还反映了未来通胀的预期。利率短期变动与股市之间的相关性甚至比我关注通货膨胀时还要弱。</blockquote> Value vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise<blockquote>通货膨胀和利率上升时的价值与增长</blockquote> What about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?<blockquote>价值相对于增长的表现如何？从历史上看，它肯定遵循了我们在过去几个月中看到的同样模式？</blockquote> Not so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.<blockquote>不是这样的。为了得出这个违反直觉的结论，我分析了自 1926 年以来美国价值和成长型股票的月回报率，数据来自达特茅斯学院金融学教授肯·弗伦奇 (Ken French)。（具体来说，价值股票投资组合包含了美国市场 30% 的账面/市值比率最低，而成长型股票投资组合包含了 30% 的账面/市值比率最高。）当关注 1 至 12 个月的所有追踪时间段时，我发现通货膨胀与价值股和成长型股票的相对表现之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。</blockquote> Even more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.<blockquote>更令人惊讶的是，当我关注利率与价值相对于增长的表现之间的关系时，我发现了一种负相关关系。这与我们过去几个月所看到的情况恰恰相反，也与传统智慧教导我们的价值股在利率上升的环境中应该如何表现相反。</blockquote> My analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.<blockquote>我的分析并不表明投资者现在应该反其道而行之，在以前押注增长的时候押注价值，反之亦然。这一分析的要点是，通货膨胀和利率与股票市场和价值相对于增长的表现之间存在着一种不稳定且往往微不足道的历史关系。</blockquote> Short-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.<blockquote>短期股市计时器需要在其他地方寻找更有力的线索，以了解市场的走向。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-inflations-spike-means-for-stocks-now-11624928059?mod=home-page\">MarketWatch</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-inflations-spike-means-for-stocks-now-11624928059?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180006824","content_text":"Expectations about inflation’s short-term impact on growth- and value stocks have no historical basis\nAGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES\nDon’t look to the latest inflation figures to help you time the U.S. stock market’s near-term ups and downs.\nThat’s worth keeping in mind because, based on recent experience, you’d be excused for thinking that inflation plays a powerful role in the stock market’s shorter-term gyrations. During the inflation scare between mid-April and mid-May, for example, value stocks outperformed growth stocks — just as conventional wisdom would expect. Since mid-May, inflation worries have receded and value stocks have lagged.\nIt doesn’t always work out this neatly. In fact, I could find no noteworthy historical relationship between inflation’s short-term trend and the performance of either the stock market as a whole or the relative performance of value- and growth stocks.\nTo search for such correlations, I started by analyzing monthly inflation, interest rates and stock market data from Yale University finance professor Robert Shiller going back to 1871. I calculated the correlation coefficients between inflation and the S&P 500 over different short-term periods extending from the trailing one month to trailing 12 months.\nI largely came up empty. Consider the extent to which changes in the CPI explain or predict simultaneous changes in the S&P 500 (as measured by a statistic known as r-squared). Regardless of the time horizon between one- and 12 months, the CPI (or its predecessor) since 1871 has been able to predict no more than 4% of the S&P 500’s gyrations. (Note carefully that, when measuring these correlations, I focused on the S&P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return so as not to bias my calculations.)\nOne of the reasons for the absence of a strong correlation is that the stock market has a love-hate relationship with inflation. When investors are more worried about economic weakness, or even deflation, higher inflation is sometimes seen as a good thing. At other times inflation and stocks are inversely correlated.\nThis fluctuating correlation is illustrated in the chart below, which tracks the correlation coefficient between the CPI and the S&P 500’s inflation-adjusted total return over the trailing 12 months. Notice the absence of any consistent relationship.\n\nAs a double-check on this surprising conclusion, I reran my analysis focusing on interest rates rather than the CPI. That’s revealing because interest rates reflect not only recent changes in inflation but also expected future inflation. The correlations between short-term movements in interest rates and the stock market were even weaker than when I focused on inflation.\nValue vs. growth when inflation and interest rates rise\nWhat about value’s performance relative to growth? Surely it historically has followed the same pattern we’ve seen over the past couple of months?\nNot so. To reach that counterintuitive conclusion, I analyzed the monthly returns of U.S. value and growth stocks since 1926, courtesy of data from Dartmouth College finance professor Ken French. (Specifically, the value stock portfolio contained the 30% of the U.S. market with the lowest book/market ratios, while the growth stock portfolio contained the 30% with the highest such ratios.) When focusing on all trailing time periods from one- to 12 months, I found no statistically significant correlation between inflation and the relative performance of value and growth stocks.\nEven more surprising is what emerged when focusing on the relationship between interest rates and value’s performance relative to growth: I found an inverse correlation. That is just the opposite of what we saw over the past couple of months, and the opposite of what conventional wisdom teaches us about how value stocks should perform in a rising interest rate environment.\nMy analysis doesn’t suggest that investors should now do the opposite, betting on value when previously they bet on growth, or vice versa. The point of this analysis is that there’s an unsteady and often insignificant historical relationship between inflation and interest rates, on the one hand, and the stock market and value’s performance relative to growth, on the other.\nShort-term stock-market timers need to look elsewhere for stronger clues as to where the market is headed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2970,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":20,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/153970239"}