Impressive_老虎社区_美港股上老虎

2021-05-28

Impressive

3 Stocks That Could Have 10X Potential<blockquote>3只可能具有10倍潜力的股票</blockquote>

免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":135277751,"tweetId":"135277751","gmtCreate":1622167383873,"gmtModify":1634183204647,"author":{"id":3577756382310448,"idStr":"3577756382310448","authorId":3577756382310448,"authorIdStr":"3577756382310448","name":"SekharS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3cf060bea92d562b2f8dab5564af02f","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":12,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Impressive&nbsp;</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Impressive&nbsp;</body></html>","text":"Impressive","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/135277751","repostId":1194886113,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194886113","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622165607,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1194886113?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-28 09:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks That Could Have 10X Potential<blockquote>3只可能具有10倍潜力的股票</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194886113","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These stocks could deliver big gains for investors if things go well.Of course, nobody knows for sur","content":"These stocks could deliver big gains for investors if things go well.Of course, nobody knows for sure what stocks will deliver 10X returns over the next several years -- if we did, we'd all be rich! However, there are some stocks whose 10X potential our experts feel quite strongly about. In thisFool Livevideo clip,&nbsp;recorded on May 14, Fool.com contributors Matt Frankel, CFP, and Jason Hall, along with chief growth officer Anand Chokkavelu, discuss three stocks they all own that they feel have 10-bagger potential.<blockquote>如果一切顺利，这些股票可以为投资者带来巨额利润。当然，没有人确切知道哪些股票会在未来几年内带来 10 倍的回报——如果我们这样做了，我们都会变得富有!然而，我们的专家对一些股票的 10 倍潜力感到非常强烈。在这个傻瓜直播视频剪辑，录制于5月14日Fool.com 撰稿人 Matt Frankel、CFP 和 Jason Hall 以及首席增长官 Anand Chokkavelu 讨论了他们都拥有的三只他们认为具有 10 袋潜力的股票。</blockquote>Anand Chokkavelu:&nbsp;Let's get on to \"most likely to 10x,\" if any.<blockquote>阿南德·乔卡韦卢：让我们继续讨论“最有可能达到 10 倍”（如果有的话）。</blockquote>Matt Frankel:&nbsp;Seritage&nbsp;(NYSE:SRG)is the cheating answer just because it's so small. Market cap well under $1 billion. With 26 million square feet of space, not including their land, it wouldn't be inconceivable for them to build that into a $7 billion business if things go well, the big if at this point. Excluding Seritage, I'd say my No. 1 to 10x isPinterest&nbsp;(NYSE:PINS). I think it can easily 10x its monetization from here.<blockquote>马特·弗兰克尔： 锯齿（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SRG）是一个欺骗性的答案，因为它太小了。市值远低于10亿美元。拥有2600万平方英尺的空间，不包括他们的土地，如果一切顺利，他们将其打造成一个70亿美元的企业并非不可想象，如果在这一点上是大的。不包括Seritage，我会说我的1到10倍是Pinterest（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）。我认为从这里开始，它可以很容易地将货币化10倍。</blockquote>Jason Hall:&nbsp;Seritage, I think is maybe the most binary. The other factor of it to be a 10x investment is eventually getting dividends. It gets the scale, it manages to get through this period of business-building without having to sell off its best assets and ruin the returns. This could be an incredible over the next 10 years. It could turn into a huge income growth stock, too, when you start thinking about total returns. I think I would agree with Seritage. I'm going to sayMercadoLibre(NASDAQ:MELI)over Pinterest. Because even though it peaked at around $100 billion, it's still less than $70 billion in market cap. The optionality in that business, the foothold they already have in Latin America, the demographics in Latin America that are going to drive its opportunity -- don't sleep on MercadoLibre being a trillion-dollar company in a decade.<blockquote>杰森·霍尔：Seritage，我想可能是最二元的。成为 10 倍投资的另一个因素是最终获得股息。它获得了规模，它设法度过了这段业务建设时期，而不必出售其最好的资产并破坏回报。这可能是未来10年不可思议的事情。当你开始考虑总回报时，它也可能变成一只巨大的收入增长股票。我想我会同意Seritage的观点。我要说自由市场（纳斯达克股票代码：MELI）超过Pinterest。因为即使达到1000亿美元左右的峰值，市值仍然不到700亿美元。该业务的可选性、他们在拉丁美洲已经拥有的立足点、拉丁美洲的人口统计数据将推动其机会——不要幻想 MercadoLibre 会在十年内成为一家价值万亿美元的公司。</blockquote>Frankel:&nbsp;In addition to the most likely, I'd like to know both of your lease likely to 10x, too. I know Anand hasn't answered so you could add that to yours. I'd sayDisney(NYSE:DIS)is least likely to 10x from here.<blockquote>弗兰克尔：除了最有可能的，我想知道你们的租约也有可能是10倍。我知道阿南德没有回答，所以你可以把它加到你的里。我会说迪士尼（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）最不可能是这里的 10 倍。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;Yeah. I want to hear what Anand says and then that way I can cherry-pick.<blockquote>大厅：是啊。我想听听阿南德怎么说，这样我就可以挑选樱桃了。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;No. It was the same. In terms of least likely is Disney because just because it's over a $300 billion market cap.<blockquote>冲击负荷：没有。是一样的。最不可能的是迪士尼，因为它的市值超过3000亿美元。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;What do you think about your first?<blockquote>大厅：你觉得你的第一个怎么样？</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;First. This is a tough one. I was really curious to see what Matt would say on Seritage. It's not an as-a-service company, so it's harder to tell us it's a real 10x-er or five x-er. Certainly because, yeah, it's the only one under $1 billion.Appian's(NASDAQ:APPN)probably got a lot of upside just because it's a $5 billion dollar company.<blockquote>冲击负荷：首先。这是一个艰难的问题。我真的很好奇马特会对Seritage说些什么。它不是一家服务公司，所以很难告诉我们它是真正的 10x-er 还是五个 x-er。当然是因为，是的，这是唯一一个低于10亿美元的。阿庇安s（纳斯达克股票代码：APPN）可能有很大的上涨空间，因为它是一家市值 50 亿美元的公司。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;Yeah.<blockquote>大厅：是啊。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;MercadoLibre and Pinterest are both in that middleweights type of thing where Pinterest is like $30-40 billion dollar market cap, MercadoLibre's $65 billion. But both of them, I could see 10x-ing.&nbsp;Square(NYSE:SQ)is interesting where it's $100 billion. Could it be a trillion? Maybe, but that one's a little harder than MercadoLibre and Pinterest to imagine.<blockquote>冲击负荷：MercadoLibre 和Pinterest都属于中量级公司，Pinterest的市值约为 300-400 亿美元，而 MercadoLibre 的市值为 650 亿美元。但是他们两个，我都能看到10倍。平方（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SQ）很有趣，它的价值是 1000 亿美元。会是一万亿吗？也许吧，但这比 MercadoLibre 和Pinterest更难想象。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;That's more than double the size of&nbsp;JPMorgan Chase. That's a big bite. That's a very big bite.<blockquote>大厅：这是两倍多摩根大通真是一口大口。这是一个很大的咬痕。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;Cherry-pick away, Jason.<blockquote>冲击负荷：去摘樱桃吧，杰森。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;I don't know, man. This is least likely to. I think I'm going to default to Disney, I really do. Again, just because of the size and thinking even with the addressable market. I mean, it's already eaten up so much in the entertainment industry.<blockquote>大厅：我不知道，伙计。这是最不可能的。我想我要默认迪士尼了，真的。同样，仅仅是因为规模和思维，即使有潜在的市场。我是说，它已经在娱乐圈吃掉了太多。</blockquote>This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.<blockquote>本文代表作者的观点，作者可能不同意 Motley Fool premium advisory service 的 “官方 ”推荐立场。我们是杂色的!质疑投资论点——即使是我们自己的论点——有助于我们所有人批判性地思考投资，并做出有助于我们变得更聪明、更快乐、更富有的决定。</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks That Could Have 10X Potential<blockquote>3只可能具有10倍潜力的股票</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks That Could Have 10X Potential<blockquote>3只可能具有10倍潜力的股票</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nMotley Fool2021-05-28 09:33\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nThese stocks could deliver big gains for investors if things go well.Of course, nobody knows for sure what stocks will deliver 10X returns over the next several years -- if we did, we'd all be rich! However, there are some stocks whose 10X potential our experts feel quite strongly about. In thisFool Livevideo clip,&nbsp;recorded on May 14, Fool.com contributors Matt Frankel, CFP, and Jason Hall, along with chief growth officer Anand Chokkavelu, discuss three stocks they all own that they feel have 10-bagger potential.<blockquote>如果一切顺利，这些股票可以为投资者带来巨额利润。当然，没有人确切知道哪些股票会在未来几年内带来 10 倍的回报——如果我们这样做了，我们都会变得富有!然而，我们的专家对一些股票的 10 倍潜力感到非常强烈。在这个傻瓜直播视频剪辑，录制于5月14日Fool.com 撰稿人 Matt Frankel、CFP 和 Jason Hall 以及首席增长官 Anand Chokkavelu 讨论了他们都拥有的三只他们认为具有 10 袋潜力的股票。</blockquote>Anand Chokkavelu:&nbsp;Let's get on to \"most likely to 10x,\" if any.<blockquote>阿南德·乔卡韦卢：让我们继续讨论“最有可能达到 10 倍”（如果有的话）。</blockquote>Matt Frankel:&nbsp;Seritage&nbsp;(NYSE:SRG)is the cheating answer just because it's so small. Market cap well under $1 billion. With 26 million square feet of space, not including their land, it wouldn't be inconceivable for them to build that into a $7 billion business if things go well, the big if at this point. Excluding Seritage, I'd say my No. 1 to 10x isPinterest&nbsp;(NYSE:PINS). I think it can easily 10x its monetization from here.<blockquote>马特·弗兰克尔： 锯齿（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SRG）是一个欺骗性的答案，因为它太小了。市值远低于10亿美元。拥有2600万平方英尺的空间，不包括他们的土地，如果一切顺利，他们将其打造成一个70亿美元的企业并非不可想象，如果在这一点上是大的。不包括Seritage，我会说我的1到10倍是Pinterest（纽约证券交易所代码：PINS）。我认为从这里开始，它可以很容易地将货币化10倍。</blockquote>Jason Hall:&nbsp;Seritage, I think is maybe the most binary. The other factor of it to be a 10x investment is eventually getting dividends. It gets the scale, it manages to get through this period of business-building without having to sell off its best assets and ruin the returns. This could be an incredible over the next 10 years. It could turn into a huge income growth stock, too, when you start thinking about total returns. I think I would agree with Seritage. I'm going to sayMercadoLibre(NASDAQ:MELI)over Pinterest. Because even though it peaked at around $100 billion, it's still less than $70 billion in market cap. The optionality in that business, the foothold they already have in Latin America, the demographics in Latin America that are going to drive its opportunity -- don't sleep on MercadoLibre being a trillion-dollar company in a decade.<blockquote>杰森·霍尔：Seritage，我想可能是最二元的。成为 10 倍投资的另一个因素是最终获得股息。它获得了规模，它设法度过了这段业务建设时期，而不必出售其最好的资产并破坏回报。这可能是未来10年不可思议的事情。当你开始考虑总回报时，它也可能变成一只巨大的收入增长股票。我想我会同意Seritage的观点。我要说自由市场（纳斯达克股票代码：MELI）超过Pinterest。因为即使达到1000亿美元左右的峰值，市值仍然不到700亿美元。该业务的可选性、他们在拉丁美洲已经拥有的立足点、拉丁美洲的人口统计数据将推动其机会——不要幻想 MercadoLibre 会在十年内成为一家价值万亿美元的公司。</blockquote>Frankel:&nbsp;In addition to the most likely, I'd like to know both of your lease likely to 10x, too. I know Anand hasn't answered so you could add that to yours. I'd sayDisney(NYSE:DIS)is least likely to 10x from here.<blockquote>弗兰克尔：除了最有可能的，我想知道你们的租约也有可能是10倍。我知道阿南德没有回答，所以你可以把它加到你的里。我会说迪士尼（纽约证券交易所股票代码：DIS）最不可能是这里的 10 倍。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;Yeah. I want to hear what Anand says and then that way I can cherry-pick.<blockquote>大厅：是啊。我想听听阿南德怎么说，这样我就可以挑选樱桃了。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;No. It was the same. In terms of least likely is Disney because just because it's over a $300 billion market cap.<blockquote>冲击负荷：没有。是一样的。最不可能的是迪士尼，因为它的市值超过3000亿美元。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;What do you think about your first?<blockquote>大厅：你觉得你的第一个怎么样？</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;First. This is a tough one. I was really curious to see what Matt would say on Seritage. It's not an as-a-service company, so it's harder to tell us it's a real 10x-er or five x-er. Certainly because, yeah, it's the only one under $1 billion.Appian's(NASDAQ:APPN)probably got a lot of upside just because it's a $5 billion dollar company.<blockquote>冲击负荷：首先。这是一个艰难的问题。我真的很好奇马特会对Seritage说些什么。它不是一家服务公司，所以很难告诉我们它是真正的 10x-er 还是五个 x-er。当然是因为，是的，这是唯一一个低于10亿美元的。阿庇安s（纳斯达克股票代码：APPN）可能有很大的上涨空间，因为它是一家市值 50 亿美元的公司。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;Yeah.<blockquote>大厅：是啊。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;MercadoLibre and Pinterest are both in that middleweights type of thing where Pinterest is like $30-40 billion dollar market cap, MercadoLibre's $65 billion. But both of them, I could see 10x-ing.&nbsp;Square(NYSE:SQ)is interesting where it's $100 billion. Could it be a trillion? Maybe, but that one's a little harder than MercadoLibre and Pinterest to imagine.<blockquote>冲击负荷：MercadoLibre 和Pinterest都属于中量级公司，Pinterest的市值约为 300-400 亿美元，而 MercadoLibre 的市值为 650 亿美元。但是他们两个，我都能看到10倍。平方（纽约证券交易所股票代码：SQ）很有趣，它的价值是 1000 亿美元。会是一万亿吗？也许吧，但这比 MercadoLibre 和Pinterest更难想象。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;That's more than double the size of&nbsp;JPMorgan Chase. That's a big bite. That's a very big bite.<blockquote>大厅：这是两倍多摩根大通真是一口大口。这是一个很大的咬痕。</blockquote>Chokkavelu:&nbsp;Cherry-pick away, Jason.<blockquote>冲击负荷：去摘樱桃吧，杰森。</blockquote>Hall:&nbsp;I don't know, man. This is least likely to. I think I'm going to default to Disney, I really do. Again, just because of the size and thinking even with the addressable market. I mean, it's already eaten up so much in the entertainment industry.<blockquote>大厅：我不知道，伙计。这是最不可能的。我想我要默认迪士尼了，真的。同样，仅仅是因为规模和思维，即使有潜在的市场。我是说，它已经在娱乐圈吃掉了太多。</blockquote>This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.<blockquote>本文代表作者的观点，作者可能不同意 Motley Fool premium advisory service 的 “官方 ”推荐立场。我们是杂色的!质疑投资论点——即使是我们自己的论点——有助于我们所有人批判性地思考投资，并做出有助于我们变得更聪明、更快乐、更富有的决定。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/27/3-stocks-that-could-have-10x-potential/\">Motley Fool</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","SRG":"Seritage Growth Properties"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/27/3-stocks-that-could-have-10x-potential/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1194886113","content_text":"These stocks could deliver big gains for investors if things go well.Of course, nobody knows for sure what stocks will deliver 10X returns over the next several years -- if we did, we'd all be rich! However, there are some stocks whose 10X potential our experts feel quite strongly about. In thisFool Livevideo clip, recorded on May 14, Fool.com contributors Matt Frankel, CFP, and Jason Hall, along with chief growth officer Anand Chokkavelu, discuss three stocks they all own that they feel have 10-bagger potential.Anand Chokkavelu: Let's get on to \"most likely to 10x,\" if any.Matt Frankel: Seritage (NYSE:SRG)is the cheating answer just because it's so small. Market cap well under $1 billion. With 26 million square feet of space, not including their land, it wouldn't be inconceivable for them to build that into a $7 billion business if things go well, the big if at this point. Excluding Seritage, I'd say my No. 1 to 10x isPinterest (NYSE:PINS). I think it can easily 10x its monetization from here.Jason Hall: Seritage, I think is maybe the most binary. The other factor of it to be a 10x investment is eventually getting dividends. It gets the scale, it manages to get through this period of business-building without having to sell off its best assets and ruin the returns. This could be an incredible over the next 10 years. It could turn into a huge income growth stock, too, when you start thinking about total returns. I think I would agree with Seritage. I'm going to sayMercadoLibre(NASDAQ:MELI)over Pinterest. Because even though it peaked at around $100 billion, it's still less than $70 billion in market cap. The optionality in that business, the foothold they already have in Latin America, the demographics in Latin America that are going to drive its opportunity -- don't sleep on MercadoLibre being a trillion-dollar company in a decade.Frankel: In addition to the most likely, I'd like to know both of your lease likely to 10x, too. I know Anand hasn't answered so you could add that to yours. I'd sayDisney(NYSE:DIS)is least likely to 10x from here.Hall: Yeah. I want to hear what Anand says and then that way I can cherry-pick.Chokkavelu: No. It was the same. In terms of least likely is Disney because just because it's over a $300 billion market cap.Hall: What do you think about your first?Chokkavelu: First. This is a tough one. I was really curious to see what Matt would say on Seritage. It's not an as-a-service company, so it's harder to tell us it's a real 10x-er or five x-er. Certainly because, yeah, it's the only one under $1 billion.Appian's(NASDAQ:APPN)probably got a lot of upside just because it's a $5 billion dollar company.Hall: Yeah.Chokkavelu: MercadoLibre and Pinterest are both in that middleweights type of thing where Pinterest is like $30-40 billion dollar market cap, MercadoLibre's $65 billion. But both of them, I could see 10x-ing. Square(NYSE:SQ)is interesting where it's $100 billion. Could it be a trillion? Maybe, but that one's a little harder than MercadoLibre and Pinterest to imagine.Hall: That's more than double the size of JPMorgan Chase. That's a big bite. That's a very big bite.Chokkavelu: Cherry-pick away, Jason.Hall: I don't know, man. This is least likely to. I think I'm going to default to Disney, I really do. Again, just because of the size and thinking even with the addressable market. I mean, it's already eaten up so much in the entertainment industry.This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium advisory service. We’re motley! Questioning an investing thesis -- even one of our own -- helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SRG":0.9,"PINS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2617,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":10,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/135277751"}