Jesss
2021-04-29
Cmon Tesla...
Tesla Haters Are Harping on Emissions Credit Sales. Investors Shouldn’t Worry.<blockquote>特斯拉的憎恨者正在喋喋不休地谈论排放信用销售。投资者不必担心。</blockquote>
免责声明：上述内容仅代表发帖人个人观点，不构成本平台的任何投资建议。
分享至
微信
复制链接
精彩评论
我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白
打开APP，发表看法
APP内打开
发表看法
2
3
{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":109422533,"tweetId":"109422533","gmtCreate":1619711748522,"gmtModify":1631888350811,"author":{"id":3581132427981586,"idStr":"3581132427981586","authorId":3581132427981586,"authorIdStr":"3581132427981586","name":"Jesss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d97fa229afbb5213f7f41ad230a8825","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":20,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Cmon Tesla...</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Cmon Tesla...</p></body></html>","text":"Cmon Tesla...","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/109422533","repostId":1172342094,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172342094","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619688965,"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/1172342094?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-04-29 17:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Haters Are Harping on Emissions Credit Sales. Investors Shouldn’t Worry.<blockquote>特斯拉的憎恨者正在喋喋不休地谈论排放信用销售。投资者不必担心。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172342094","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Teslabears need to stop harping onregulatory creditsales. The oft-repeated refrain is that Tesla isn","content":"<p>Teslabears need to stop harping onregulatory creditsales. The oft-repeated refrain is that Tesla isn’t profitable without credit sales. There are plenty of reasons bears can avoid Tesla stock, butcreditsTesla earns, and then sells for cash to other auto makers, for producing more than its shares of zero emission vehicles isn’t one of them.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉看空者需要停止喋喋不休地谈论监管信用销售。人们常说的一句话是，没有赊销，特斯拉就无法盈利。空头可以避开特斯拉股票的理由有很多，但将特斯拉赚取利润，然后出售给其他汽车制造商换取现金的理由并不在其中。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla (ticker: TSLA) sold more than $500 million in regulatory credits in thefirst quarterand generated just under $600 million in operating profit. Excluding the credits, Tesla only eked out a small operating profit.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）第一季度出售了超过 5 亿美元的监管信用，并产生了略低于 6 亿美元的营业利润。除去信贷，特斯拉只勉强获得了少量的营业利润。</blockquote></p><p> But saying Tesla isn’t profitable without regulatory credits is falling victim to the fallacy of the predetermined outcome. It’s like saying the New York Jets lost a football game because of a bad call in the first quarter. There are many reasons the Jets lose and a refereeing mistakes aren’t one of them.</p><p><blockquote>但是，如果说特斯拉没有监管信用就无法盈利，那就成了预定结果谬误的牺牲品。这就像说纽约喷气机队输掉了一场橄榄球赛是因为第一节看涨期权不佳。喷气机队输球的原因有很多，裁判失误不是其中之一。</blockquote></p><p> To drive the analogy further, any Jets game would be totally different if the ref didn’t mess up. A penalty not called, or called, changes each subsequent play in unknown ways. If Tesla didn’t have regulatory credits to sell, the company would have to raise prices or cut costs or do something else to make money. The company would adapt to the situation.</p><p><blockquote>进一步打个比方，如果裁判没有搞砸，喷气机队的任何一场比赛都会完全不同。一个未被判罚或被判罚的点球会以未知的方式改变每场后续比赛。如果特斯拉没有监管信用可供出售，该公司将不得不提高价格、削减成本或做其他事情来赚钱。公司会适应这种情况。</blockquote></p><p> Raising prices could be a way to go, but higher prices, of course, have their own impact, potentially reducing demand. Tesla still managed to grow sales even after the company lost its $7,500 U.S. federaltax credit. That isn’t available to Tesla buyers any longer because Tesla has sold too many EVs to qualify.</p><p><blockquote>提高价格可能是一种方法，但当然，价格上涨也会产生影响，可能会减少需求。即使在公司失去了 7,500 美元的美国联邦税收抵免后，特斯拉仍然设法增加了销售额。由于特斯拉售出的电动汽车太多，不符合资格，特斯拉买家已经无法使用该服务了。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla lost that federal credit at the end of 2019. It was effectively a $7,500 price increase in the U.S. on Jan. 1, 2020. Tesla sales in the U.S. grew 20% this past year, hitting $15.2 billion, up from $12.7 billion in 2019.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在2019年底失去了联邦信贷。2020年1月1日，美国的价格上涨了7500美元。去年特斯拉在美国的销售额增长了 20%，达到 152 亿美元，高于 2019 年的 127 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> There is one other–rather large–point about regulatory credits. They aren’t going away. If anything, they will increase. Government support might morph from what Tesla sells today into new purchase tax credits or something else, but governmentsin Chinaandthe U.S.are looking to increase the number of EVs sold.</p><p><blockquote>关于监管信用还有另一个相当重要的一点。他们不会消失的。如果有的话，它们会增加。政府支持可能会从特斯拉目前的销售转变为新的购置税抵免或其他方式，但中国和美国政府正在寻求增加电动汽车的销售数量。</blockquote></p><p> Refusing to deduct credit sales from operating income doesn’t make an investor a Tesla devotee. There are plenty of reasons people can choose to avoid the stock.Valuationbeing chief among them. Tesla is the world’s most valuable auto maker by a factor of roughly three even though it makes a fraction of the cars thatToyota Motor(TM), the second most valuable car company, does.</p><p><blockquote>拒绝从经营利润中扣除赊销并不能使投资者成为特斯拉的忠实拥护者。人们可以选择避开该股票有很多原因。估值是其中之一。特斯拉是世界上最有价值的汽车制造商，但其汽车产量只有第二大最有价值汽车公司丰田汽车（TM）的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> Valuation is a stale reason to dislike the stock. People have been complaining about valuation for a long time. Investors can also decide that competition is ramping higher or that full self-driving technology will take longer to develop than Tesla currently believes and suggests. Autonomous driving isn’t easy. Elon Musk calls it the company’s hardest challenge and its biggest potential value creator.</p><p><blockquote>估值是不喜欢这只股票的陈旧理由。长期以来，人们一直在抱怨估值。投资者还可以决定竞争正在加剧，或者全自动驾驶技术的开发时间将比特斯拉目前认为和建议的要长。自动驾驶并不容易。Elon Musk 评级 it 是公司面临的最大挑战，也是公司最大的潜在价值创造者。</blockquote></p><p> There is something in Tesla stock for full self-driving technology. How much is hard to say. Morgan Stanley analystAdam Jonasvalues Tesla mobility and network services business opportunities at roughly $330 a share.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票中有全自动驾驶技术的东西。多少很难说。摩根士丹利分析师 Adam Jonas 估计特斯拉移动和网络服务的商机约为每股 330 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Those include software sales and robotaxis–both businesses are dependent on autonomous driving technology. His value is almost half of Tesla’s current stock price. Although Jonas’ Tesla target is $900 a share, making those business closer to one-third of the value he sees in the company.</p><p><blockquote>其中包括软件销售和机器人出租车——这两项业务都依赖于自动驾驶技术。他的身价几乎是特斯拉目前股价的一半。虽然乔纳斯的特斯拉目标是每股 900 美元，但这使得这些业务接近他对公司价值的三分之一。</blockquote></p><p> Autonomous hiccups, valuation and competition should be enough reason to avoid the stock. Just stop saying the company doesn’t make money without regulatory credits.</p><p><blockquote>自主问题、估值和竞争应该足以成为避开该股的理由。别再说公司没有监管信用就不赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shares are down about 2% year to date, trailing behind comparable gains of theS&P 500andDow Jones Industrial Average.Investors aren’t worried about the credit conundrum. They are waiting for quarterly operating profits to set new highs. When, and if, it does, they won’t care about the composition of the operating profit.</p><p><blockquote>今年迄今为止，特斯拉股价已下跌约 2%，落后于标准普尔 500 指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的可比涨幅。投资者并不担心信贷难题。他们正在等待季度营业利润创下新高。如果真的发生了，他们就不会关心营业利润的构成。</blockquote></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Haters Are Harping on Emissions Credit Sales. Investors Shouldn’t Worry.<blockquote>特斯拉的憎恨者正在喋喋不休地谈论排放信用销售。投资者不必担心。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Haters Are Harping on Emissions Credit Sales. Investors Shouldn’t Worry.<blockquote>特斯拉的憎恨者正在喋喋不休地谈论排放信用销售。投资者不必担心。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">MarketWatch</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-29 17:36</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Teslabears need to stop harping onregulatory creditsales. The oft-repeated refrain is that Tesla isn’t profitable without credit sales. There are plenty of reasons bears can avoid Tesla stock, butcreditsTesla earns, and then sells for cash to other auto makers, for producing more than its shares of zero emission vehicles isn’t one of them.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉看空者需要停止喋喋不休地谈论监管信用销售。人们常说的一句话是，没有赊销，特斯拉就无法盈利。空头可以避开特斯拉股票的理由有很多，但将特斯拉赚取利润，然后出售给其他汽车制造商换取现金的理由并不在其中。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla (ticker: TSLA) sold more than $500 million in regulatory credits in thefirst quarterand generated just under $600 million in operating profit. Excluding the credits, Tesla only eked out a small operating profit.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）第一季度出售了超过 5 亿美元的监管信用，并产生了略低于 6 亿美元的营业利润。除去信贷，特斯拉只勉强获得了少量的营业利润。</blockquote></p><p> But saying Tesla isn’t profitable without regulatory credits is falling victim to the fallacy of the predetermined outcome. It’s like saying the New York Jets lost a football game because of a bad call in the first quarter. There are many reasons the Jets lose and a refereeing mistakes aren’t one of them.</p><p><blockquote>但是，如果说特斯拉没有监管信用就无法盈利，那就成了预定结果谬误的牺牲品。这就像说纽约喷气机队输掉了一场橄榄球赛是因为第一节看涨期权不佳。喷气机队输球的原因有很多，裁判失误不是其中之一。</blockquote></p><p> To drive the analogy further, any Jets game would be totally different if the ref didn’t mess up. A penalty not called, or called, changes each subsequent play in unknown ways. If Tesla didn’t have regulatory credits to sell, the company would have to raise prices or cut costs or do something else to make money. The company would adapt to the situation.</p><p><blockquote>进一步打个比方，如果裁判没有搞砸，喷气机队的任何一场比赛都会完全不同。一个未被判罚或被判罚的点球会以未知的方式改变每场后续比赛。如果特斯拉没有监管信用可供出售，该公司将不得不提高价格、削减成本或做其他事情来赚钱。公司会适应这种情况。</blockquote></p><p> Raising prices could be a way to go, but higher prices, of course, have their own impact, potentially reducing demand. Tesla still managed to grow sales even after the company lost its $7,500 U.S. federaltax credit. That isn’t available to Tesla buyers any longer because Tesla has sold too many EVs to qualify.</p><p><blockquote>提高价格可能是一种方法，但当然，价格上涨也会产生影响，可能会减少需求。即使在公司失去了 7,500 美元的美国联邦税收抵免后，特斯拉仍然设法增加了销售额。由于特斯拉售出的电动汽车太多，不符合资格，特斯拉买家已经无法使用该服务了。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla lost that federal credit at the end of 2019. It was effectively a $7,500 price increase in the U.S. on Jan. 1, 2020. Tesla sales in the U.S. grew 20% this past year, hitting $15.2 billion, up from $12.7 billion in 2019.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉在2019年底失去了联邦信贷。2020年1月1日，美国的价格上涨了7500美元。去年特斯拉在美国的销售额增长了 20%，达到 152 亿美元，高于 2019 年的 127 亿美元。</blockquote></p><p> There is one other–rather large–point about regulatory credits. They aren’t going away. If anything, they will increase. Government support might morph from what Tesla sells today into new purchase tax credits or something else, but governmentsin Chinaandthe U.S.are looking to increase the number of EVs sold.</p><p><blockquote>关于监管信用还有另一个相当重要的一点。他们不会消失的。如果有的话，它们会增加。政府支持可能会从特斯拉目前的销售转变为新的购置税抵免或其他方式，但中国和美国政府正在寻求增加电动汽车的销售数量。</blockquote></p><p> Refusing to deduct credit sales from operating income doesn’t make an investor a Tesla devotee. There are plenty of reasons people can choose to avoid the stock.Valuationbeing chief among them. Tesla is the world’s most valuable auto maker by a factor of roughly three even though it makes a fraction of the cars thatToyota Motor(TM), the second most valuable car company, does.</p><p><blockquote>拒绝从经营利润中扣除赊销并不能使投资者成为特斯拉的忠实拥护者。人们可以选择避开该股票有很多原因。估值是其中之一。特斯拉是世界上最有价值的汽车制造商，但其汽车产量只有第二大最有价值汽车公司丰田汽车（TM）的一小部分。</blockquote></p><p> Valuation is a stale reason to dislike the stock. People have been complaining about valuation for a long time. Investors can also decide that competition is ramping higher or that full self-driving technology will take longer to develop than Tesla currently believes and suggests. Autonomous driving isn’t easy. Elon Musk calls it the company’s hardest challenge and its biggest potential value creator.</p><p><blockquote>估值是不喜欢这只股票的陈旧理由。长期以来，人们一直在抱怨估值。投资者还可以决定竞争正在加剧，或者全自动驾驶技术的开发时间将比特斯拉目前认为和建议的要长。自动驾驶并不容易。Elon Musk 评级 it 是公司面临的最大挑战，也是公司最大的潜在价值创造者。</blockquote></p><p> There is something in Tesla stock for full self-driving technology. How much is hard to say. Morgan Stanley analystAdam Jonasvalues Tesla mobility and network services business opportunities at roughly $330 a share.</p><p><blockquote>特斯拉股票中有全自动驾驶技术的东西。多少很难说。摩根士丹利分析师 Adam Jonas 估计特斯拉移动和网络服务的商机约为每股 330 美元。</blockquote></p><p> Those include software sales and robotaxis–both businesses are dependent on autonomous driving technology. His value is almost half of Tesla’s current stock price. Although Jonas’ Tesla target is $900 a share, making those business closer to one-third of the value he sees in the company.</p><p><blockquote>其中包括软件销售和机器人出租车——这两项业务都依赖于自动驾驶技术。他的身价几乎是特斯拉目前股价的一半。虽然乔纳斯的特斯拉目标是每股 900 美元，但这使得这些业务接近他对公司价值的三分之一。</blockquote></p><p> Autonomous hiccups, valuation and competition should be enough reason to avoid the stock. Just stop saying the company doesn’t make money without regulatory credits.</p><p><blockquote>自主问题、估值和竞争应该足以成为避开该股的理由。别再说公司没有监管信用就不赚钱了。</blockquote></p><p> Tesla shares are down about 2% year to date, trailing behind comparable gains of theS&P 500andDow Jones Industrial Average.Investors aren’t worried about the credit conundrum. They are waiting for quarterly operating profits to set new highs. When, and if, it does, they won’t care about the composition of the operating profit.</p><p><blockquote>今年迄今为止，特斯拉股价已下跌约 2%，落后于标准普尔 500 指数和道琼斯工业平均指数的可比涨幅。投资者并不担心信贷难题。他们正在等待季度营业利润创下新高。如果真的发生了，他们就不会关心营业利润的构成。</blockquote></p><p></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> 来源：<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/tesla-haters-are-harping-on-emissions-credit-sales-investors-shouldnt-worry-51619652841?mod=mw_latestnews\">MarketWatch</a></p>\n<p>为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化</p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/tesla-haters-are-harping-on-emissions-credit-sales-investors-shouldnt-worry-51619652841?mod=mw_latestnews","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172342094","content_text":"Teslabears need to stop harping onregulatory creditsales. The oft-repeated refrain is that Tesla isn’t profitable without credit sales. There are plenty of reasons bears can avoid Tesla stock, butcreditsTesla earns, and then sells for cash to other auto makers, for producing more than its shares of zero emission vehicles isn’t one of them.\nTesla (ticker: TSLA) sold more than $500 million in regulatory credits in thefirst quarterand generated just under $600 million in operating profit. Excluding the credits, Tesla only eked out a small operating profit.\nBut saying Tesla isn’t profitable without regulatory credits is falling victim to the fallacy of the predetermined outcome. It’s like saying the New York Jets lost a football game because of a bad call in the first quarter. There are many reasons the Jets lose and a refereeing mistakes aren’t one of them.\nTo drive the analogy further, any Jets game would be totally different if the ref didn’t mess up. A penalty not called, or called, changes each subsequent play in unknown ways. If Tesla didn’t have regulatory credits to sell, the company would have to raise prices or cut costs or do something else to make money. The company would adapt to the situation.\nRaising prices could be a way to go, but higher prices, of course, have their own impact, potentially reducing demand. Tesla still managed to grow sales even after the company lost its $7,500 U.S. federaltax credit. That isn’t available to Tesla buyers any longer because Tesla has sold too many EVs to qualify.\nTesla lost that federal credit at the end of 2019. It was effectively a $7,500 price increase in the U.S. on Jan. 1, 2020. Tesla sales in the U.S. grew 20% this past year, hitting $15.2 billion, up from $12.7 billion in 2019.\nThere is one other–rather large–point about regulatory credits. They aren’t going away. If anything, they will increase. Government support might morph from what Tesla sells today into new purchase tax credits or something else, but governmentsin Chinaandthe U.S.are looking to increase the number of EVs sold.\nRefusing to deduct credit sales from operating income doesn’t make an investor a Tesla devotee. There are plenty of reasons people can choose to avoid the stock.Valuationbeing chief among them. Tesla is the world’s most valuable auto maker by a factor of roughly three even though it makes a fraction of the cars thatToyota Motor(TM), the second most valuable car company, does.\nValuation is a stale reason to dislike the stock. People have been complaining about valuation for a long time. Investors can also decide that competition is ramping higher or that full self-driving technology will take longer to develop than Tesla currently believes and suggests. Autonomous driving isn’t easy. Elon Musk calls it the company’s hardest challenge and its biggest potential value creator.\nThere is something in Tesla stock for full self-driving technology. How much is hard to say. Morgan Stanley analystAdam Jonasvalues Tesla mobility and network services business opportunities at roughly $330 a share.\nThose include software sales and robotaxis–both businesses are dependent on autonomous driving technology. His value is almost half of Tesla’s current stock price. Although Jonas’ Tesla target is $900 a share, making those business closer to one-third of the value he sees in the company.\nAutonomous hiccups, valuation and competition should be enough reason to avoid the stock. Just stop saying the company doesn’t make money without regulatory credits.\nTesla shares are down about 2% year to date, trailing behind comparable gains of theS&P 500andDow Jones Industrial Average.Investors aren’t worried about the credit conundrum. They are waiting for quarterly operating profits to set new highs. When, and if, it does, they won’t care about the composition of the operating profit.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1187,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["08278","01792"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":12,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/109422533"}
精彩评论