苏泊尔广告翻车：让几块钱AI干掉数千万市值不划算|新京报快评

新京报08-09 19:32

▲近日，苏泊尔官方账号发布了一系列AI生成的短视频，招致广泛批评。图/齐鲁晚报“这场由几条AI广告引发的舆情风波，最终可能以数千万市值蒸发的代价收场。”据封面新闻报道，7月下旬以来，苏泊尔旗下“个护电器旗舰店”等多个电商账号批量发布AI生成的擦边短视频，内容以异性闯入私密空间为噱头配以露骨台词，迅速引发全网批评。这还疑似影响到苏泊尔股价，截至发稿，苏泊尔股价已连续四日下跌。“女生洗澡，大叔帮忙搓背...

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

精彩评论

我们需要你的真知灼见来填补这片空白

发表看法

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://www.laohunote.com/m/news/2658767248?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"https://media.bjnews.com.cn/fz/html/AttachPubDev/2026/8/herui2026891932333139835.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,m_lfit,w_365/quality,q_80","is_english":false,"pubTime":"2026-08-09 19:32","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2658767248","market":"hk","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"苏泊尔广告翻车：让几块钱AI干掉数千万市值不划算|新京报快评","media":"新京报","content":"<div>\n<p>▲近日，苏泊尔官方账号发布了一系列AI生成的短视频，招致广泛批评。图/齐鲁晚报“这场由几条AI广告引发的舆情风波，最终可能以数千万市值蒸发的代价收场。”据封面新闻报道，7月下旬以来，苏泊尔旗下“个护电器旗舰店”等多个电商账号批量发布AI生成的擦边短视频，内容以异性闯入私密空间为噱头配以露骨台词，迅速引发全网批评。这还疑似影响到苏泊尔股价，截至发稿，苏泊尔股价已连续四日下跌。“女生洗澡，大叔帮忙搓背...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1786275154168710.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"highlight_bjnews","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>苏泊尔广告翻车：让几块钱AI干掉数千万市值不划算|新京报快评</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n苏泊尔广告翻车：让几块钱AI干掉数千万市值不划算|新京报快评\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-08-09 19:32 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1786275154168710.html><strong>新京报</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>▲近日，苏泊尔官方账号发布了一系列AI生成的短视频，招致广泛批评。图/齐鲁晚报“这场由几条AI广告引发的舆情风波，最终可能以数千万市值蒸发的代价收场。”据封面新闻报道，7月下旬以来，苏泊尔旗下“个护电器旗舰店”等多个电商账号批量发布AI生成的擦边短视频，内容以异性闯入私密空间为噱头配以露骨台词，迅速引发全网批评。这还疑似影响到苏泊尔股价，截至发稿，苏泊尔股价已连续四日下跌。“女生洗澡，大叔帮忙搓背...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1786275154168710.html\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"002032","symbol_name":"苏泊尔","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1786275154168710.html","article_id":"2658767248","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://media.bjnews.com.cn/fz/html/AttachPubDev/2026/8/herui2026891932333139835.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,m_lfit,w_365/quality,q_80"],"rights":{"source":"highlight_bjnews","url":"https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/1786275154168710.html","rn_cache_url":null,"customStyle":"handleCustomStyle(customStyle, ThemeStyle, getFont(fontSize))","selectors":"#main .nleft","filters":".ntit, .attitude","directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2658767248","pubTimestamp":1786275120,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"highlight_bjnews","name":"新京报"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"\n                                                与其说AI广告翻车是技术失控，不如说是商业逻辑失衡。                                                [全文]\n","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"bjnews.com.cn","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"zh","relate_stocks":{"002032":"苏泊尔","IE0005HP3H50.USD":"GUINNESS CHINA \"C\" (USD) ACC","VTHR":"Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF","IE00BVYPNQ40.USD":"GUINNESS ASIAN EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (USD) ACC","BK0188":"融资融券","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF","IE00BVYPNP33.GBP":"GUINNESS ASIAN EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (GBP) ACC","BK0187":"一线龙头","BK0021":"外资并购(国际板)","AIPO":"Defiance AI and Power Infrastructure ETF","QTOC":"Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October","BK0028":"国家队","IE00BZ08YR35.GBP":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (GBP) ACC","IE00BZ08YS42.EUR":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (EUR) ACC","AGIX":"通用人工智能 ETF-AGIX","IE00BGHQDM52.EUR":"GUINNESS ASIAN EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (EUR) ACC","BK0175":"白马股","BK0256":"金属制品","IE00BZ08YT58.USD":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (USD) ACC","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","IE00BYV24P56.USD":"GUINNESS EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMCWC346.EUR":"GUINNESS EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (EUR) ACC","BK0196":"行业龙头"},"translate_title":"Supor Advertising Rollover: It's not cost-effective to let a few dollars AI kill tens of millions of market value | Beijing News Quick Review","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"CHAT":1.5,"AIPO":1.5,"AGIX":1.5,"VTHR":1.5,"002032":1.5,"QTOC":1.5,"ARTY":1.5},"content_text":"▲近日，苏泊尔官方账号发布了一系列AI生成的短视频，招致广泛批评。图/齐鲁晚报“这场由几条AI广告引发的舆情风波，最终可能以数千万市值蒸发的代价收场。”据封面新闻报道，7月下旬以来，苏泊尔旗下“个护电器旗舰店”等多个电商账号批量发布AI生成的擦边短视频，内容以异性闯入私密空间为噱头配以露骨台词，迅速引发全网批评。这还疑似影响到苏泊尔股价，截至发稿，苏泊尔股价已连续四日下跌。“女生洗澡，大叔帮忙搓背”，当这样的荒诞剧情出现在国民家电品牌苏泊尔的官方账号上时，很多人的第一反应是：不可思议。但这并非个例，近期已经有多个品牌集体翻车，AI广告几乎成了低俗引流和内容事故的重灾区。据统计，仅2026年上半年，国内就有超过十个品牌因AI广告内容引发舆情，其中低俗擦边、画面失真、虚假宣传是三大重灾区。一些业内人士将广告内容翻车事件大增归罪于AI。或许AI在想象力方面比人类更不受束缚，一旦算法锁定流量目标，AI天然就会寻找更刺激的内容方向，导致会生成一些荒诞剧情。但这个“锅”并不能甩给AI，最终把这些剧情推向市场的还是人类。所以，需反思的是，当AI把内容生产成本降到几元钱时，企业是否也顺手把责任成本降到了几元钱？可以看到，近年来，AI广告带来的不是百分之几十的增量，而是几何级的素材产能跃迁。传统人工时期，一个运营团队每月或每周精打细算产出十几条到上百条广告内容，单条成本几百到几万元不等。但如今，运营人员只需输入关键词，AI工具几分钟甚至几秒钟就能生成批量脚本与视频。一个人即可管理数十个账号，甚至每天产出上千条广告素材。从这个角度讲，在内容输出百倍级增加的背景下，翻车事故从“以前一年出几个大事件”到用了AI以后，“现在每个月都有”，事故率其实还是降低了。但问题在于，社会公众不会关心“事故率”，看到的只是“事故量”的大增。无论从哪方面讲，任何不良内容广告被投放到社会都是不被允许的——如果在广告界存在一个所谓的“事故率”，那也应该是零。过去制作一条品牌广告，流程长、成本高，但其中也包含了一套隐性的风险过滤机制。现在，AI广告变成批量产出，导致原来的风险过滤机制失效，企业本应补上这个漏洞，但实际却相反，“一条AI广告几块钱，谁会花几十块钱请人审核？”企业不能因为一条AI广告成本只有几元钱，就认为一次试错成本也只有几元钱，让几块钱的AI干掉数千万市值明显不划算。尤其对消费品牌而言，广告不是普通流量素材，而是品牌资产的一部分，积累的消费者信任也不能被几秒钟广告透支。当广告进入AI时代，企业不能只计算投资回报率，还要计算信任成本。因此，与其说多个品牌AI广告翻车是技术失控，不如说是商业逻辑失衡。问题不是出在AI算法，而是企业在追求效率时，把本该由人承担的责任也一起外包给了机器。而且，更大的风险还不是AI犯错，而是企业潜意识里把AI当成免责工具，不但自我宽容，也以为公众也会宽容AI犯下的“非人为错误”。但就像摄像机拍出侵权视频，责任不在摄像机，AI广告翻车的责任主体仍然是企业方，由此消耗的更是品牌信任。客观说，面对AI所带来的巨大变革，出现一些新的错漏可以理解，关键在于能否针对新情况建立新机制。就AI广告造成的冲击而言，企业应该思考的是，AI广告时代，企业的成本很可能需要从制作、投放向审核做重大迁移。毕竟，即便流量逻辑允许10000个AI素材中有9999个失败，品牌资产却无法承受哪怕只有一次的严重伤害。一方面，AI生产线在加速建立，另一方面，人工安全阀要不断增加。不要以为在AI时代，人工的增加就是逆流或者失败，这反而会是大势所趋。撰稿 / 信海光（媒体人）编辑 / 迟道华校对 / 卢茜","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":false,"isLaohu8Offline":false,"tenantId":"TBCN","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.44.1","shortVersion":"4.44.1","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"laohu8","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2658767248","isCrawlerRequest":true}