Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.

Barrons2021-10-19

Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense? Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question....

网页链接

免责声明：本文观点仅代表作者个人观点，不构成本平台的投资建议，本平台不对文章信息准确性、完整性和及时性做出任何保证，亦不对因使用或信赖文章信息引发的任何损失承担责任。

精彩评论

HelloKitty55
2021-10-19
HelloKitty55
Ok
Flyingturtle
2021-10-19
Flyingturtle
Scary
- Flyingturtle:
  Sure
- Tchwee56:
  Like pleaSe
SanWangtikup
2021-10-19
SanWangtikup
Tesla[Miser] [Miser]
aaronh
2021-10-19
aaronh
[微笑]
- aaronh:
  [财迷]
ToongMH
2021-10-19
ToongMH
I like EV stock
jaffer
2021-10-19
jaffer
Like and comment pls
- JeremyKok:
  hi. please like and comment back. thank you.

发表看法

101

344

{"i18n":{"language":"zh_CN"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1147398025","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.","media":"Barrons","content":"<div>\nTesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question....\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1601382232898","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-10-19 09:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6>Barrons</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nTesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question....\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">网页链接</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"TM","symbol_name":"丰田汽车","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","article_id":"1147398025","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1601382232898","name":"Barrons"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"barrons.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"translate_title":"特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商。这有什么意义。","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9},"content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":859939628,"gmtCreate":1634648905179,"gmtModify":1634648905518,"author":{"id":"3587095479419511","authorId":"3587095479419511","name":"HelloKitty55","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d60ee63e7e29d36d5bc7561ef9bc3ed6","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3587095479419511","idStr":"3587095479419511"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859939628","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":859012647,"gmtCreate":1634637827104,"gmtModify":1634637827250,"author":{"id":"4095043116375190","authorId":"4095043116375190","name":"Flyingturtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1957f36443fce071543ef050392ebc5","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4095043116375190","idStr":"4095043116375190"},"htmlText":"Scary","listText":"Scary","text":"Scary","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859012647","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6253522,"gmtCreate":1634647137875,"gmtModify":1634647137913,"authorId":4095043116375190,"author":{"id":4095043116375190,"idStr":"4095043116375190","authorId":4095043116375190,"name":"Flyingturtle","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1957f36443fce071543ef050392ebc5","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":859012647,"type":1,"supId":6253200,"prevId":0,"content":"Sure","text":"Sure","html":"Sure"},{"id":6253200,"gmtCreate":1634644691476,"gmtModify":1634644691508,"authorId":3569457005614885,"author":{"id":3569457005614885,"idStr":"3569457005614885","authorId":3569457005614885,"name":"Tchwee56","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf5f966c61e6a7efe5375ef68070f8d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":859012647,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Like pleaSe","text":"Like pleaSe","html":"Like pleaSe"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":859034020,"gmtCreate":1634636753803,"gmtModify":1634636947809,"author":{"id":"4087452914358580","authorId":"4087452914358580","name":"SanWangtikup","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7f061d50a9f915d0ce8e8c879871960","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4087452914358580","idStr":"4087452914358580"},"htmlText":"Tesla[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"Tesla[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"Tesla[Miser] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/859034020","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":850775222,"gmtCreate":1634633070528,"gmtModify":1634633070805,"author":{"id":"3572385806607275","authorId":"3572385806607275","name":"aaronh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4633f061d6a91b98037c28e4007151ac","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3572385806607275","idStr":"3572385806607275"},"htmlText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850775222","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6251775,"gmtCreate":1634633079496,"gmtModify":1634633079527,"authorId":3572385806607275,"author":{"id":3572385806607275,"idStr":"3572385806607275","authorId":3572385806607275,"name":"aaronh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4633f061d6a91b98037c28e4007151ac","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":850775222,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[财迷]","text":"[财迷]","html":"[财迷]"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":850759563,"gmtCreate":1634630814824,"gmtModify":1634630815262,"author":{"id":"3579230468032082","authorId":"3579230468032082","name":"ToongMH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3579230468032082","idStr":"3579230468032082"},"htmlText":"I like EV stock","listText":"I like EV stock","text":"I like EV stock","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850759563","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":850722618,"gmtCreate":1634630485902,"gmtModify":1634630486813,"author":{"id":"3574309252756598","authorId":"3574309252756598","name":"jaffer","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a3d779d7e90da7a7b584e147536abf7","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574309252756598","idStr":"3574309252756598"},"htmlText":"Like and comment pls&nbsp;","listText":"Like and comment pls&nbsp;","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://laohu8.com/post/850722618","repostId":1147398025,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147398025","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1634608414,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147398025?lang=zh_CN&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-10-19 09:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147398025","media":"Barrons","summary":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manuf","content":"Tesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote></title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla and 15 Other EV Stocks Are Worth Almost as Much as 50 Traditional Car Makers. How That Makes Sense.<blockquote>特斯拉和其他15只电动汽车股票的价值几乎相当于50家传统汽车制造商的价值。这怎么说得通。</blockquote>\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\nBarrons2021-10-19 09:53\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nTesla&nbsp;and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?<blockquote>特斯拉和其他电动汽车制造商几乎占汽车制造商股票价值的一半。这有意义吗？</blockquote> Monday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;(ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.<blockquote>周一，伯恩斯坦分析师托尼·萨科纳吉提出了这个问题。他对特斯拉（股票代码：TSLA）股票给予看跌评级，目标价为300美元，主要是因为他认为该股价格昂贵。尽管如此，如果投资者接受三个想法，电动汽车的价值可能会达到整个行业的一半。</blockquote> Today, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD&nbsp;(1211.Hong Kong), and&nbsp;NIO&nbsp;(NIO).<blockquote>如今，包括特斯拉和尚未上市的Rivian在内的16家电动汽车制造商的总价值为1.14万亿美元。特斯拉占电动汽车总价值的74%。十大最有价值汽车制造商中有四家是电动汽车公司，包括：特斯拉、Rivian、比亚迪（1211.Hong Kong）和蔚来（蔚来）。</blockquote> As for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor&nbsp;(TM),Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW3.Germany),Daimler&nbsp;(DAI.Germany), and&nbsp;General Motors&nbsp;(GM).<blockquote>至于传统汽车制造商，50多家汽车制造商的总价值为1.42万亿美元。最有价值的传统车企是：丰田汽车(TM)、大众汽车(VOW3.Germany)、戴姆勒(DAI.Germany)、通用汽车(GM)。</blockquote> Sales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.<blockquote>传统公司的销量仍然主导着销量，在全球销售了约99%的汽车，其中97%是汽油动力汽车，2%是电动汽车。纯电动汽车在全球范围内销售剩余的1%。</blockquote> “The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.<blockquote>萨科纳吉在周一的一份报告中写道：“当然，我们的想法是纯电动汽车供应商最终将主导汽车世界。”</blockquote> That’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.<blockquote>这是投资者需要相信的第一件事，以证明电动汽车估值的合理性。萨科纳吉指出，2014年纯电动汽车公司占电动汽车销量的14%。今天是28%。纯电动汽车公司的市场份额正在增长。</blockquote> That’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.<blockquote>这是保持看好电动汽车制造商股票所需的第二个信念——市场份额将继续提高。这位分析师在报告中补充道：“我们怀疑市场认为……传统原始设备制造商未来将无法提供有竞争力的电动汽车产品。”OEM是原始设备制造商的缩写，是汽车制造商的行业术语。</blockquote> The final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.<blockquote>投资者需要相信的最后一件事是，电动汽车的每辆车利润将比传统汽车更高。电动汽车公司倾向于直接销售，这有助于提高盈利能力。电动汽车制造商也是销售附加订阅服务的领导者。特斯拉的全自动驾驶能力（FSD）可能是最好的例子。特斯拉以每月订阅或10,000美元的价格出售更高级别的自动驾驶软件。</blockquote> The mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”<blockquote>优质产品推动的销量和利润增长的组合可能证明估值是合理的，但萨科纳吉并不相信这一点。“我们的论点是，汽车行业是一个日益全球化和竞争激烈的行业，我们相信，随着时间的推移，剩余利润和技术创新可能会被竞争夺走。”</blockquote> His views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”<blockquote>他对该行业的看法是他对评级·特斯拉估值“过高”的原因之一。</blockquote> Time will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.<blockquote>时间会证明谁是对的。萨科纳吉的目标价仍然意味着特斯拉应该是世界上最有价值的汽车公司，只是不是丰田价值的两到三倍。</blockquote> Tesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.<blockquote>由于投资者对周三晚间公布的第三季度财报更加看好，特斯拉股价最近一直在上涨，过去三个月上涨了34%。周一股价又上涨3.2%。</blockquote>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n 来源：<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6\">Barrons</a>\n为提升您的阅读体验，我们对本页面进行了排版优化\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TM":"丰田汽车","LI":"理想汽车","01211":"比亚迪股份","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-nio-51634569822?mod=hp_DAY_6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147398025","content_text":"Tesla and other electric-vehicle makers account for almost half of the value wrapped up in car-manufacturer stocks. Does that make sense?\nMonday, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi asked that question. He’s a Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bear—rating shares Sell with a $300 price target—mainly because he believes the stock is pricey. Still, EVs can be worth half of the industry if investors buy into three ideas.\nToday, 16 EV makers—including Tesla and yet-to-be public Rivian—are worth a combined $1.14 trillion. Tesla accounts for 74% of total EV value. Four of the top 10 most valuable auto makers are EV companies including: Tesla, Rivian,BYD (1211.Hong Kong), and NIO (NIO).\nAs for the makers of conventional vehicles, more than 50 auto makers are worth a combined $1.42 trillion. The most valuable traditional car companies are:Toyota Motor (TM),Volkswagen (VOW3.Germany),Daimler (DAI.Germany), and General Motors (GM).\nSales by the traditional companies still dominates unit volume, selling about 99% of the cars globally—97% of those are gasoline-powered, and 2% are EV. The EV pure-plays sell the remaining 1% worldwide.\n“The thinking, of course, is that pure-play EV vendors will ultimately come to dominate the automotive world,” wrote Sacconaghi in a Monday report.\nThat’s the first thing investors need to believe to justify EV valuations. Sacconaghi points out that 2014 pure-play EV companies accounted for 14% of electric-car sales. That’s 28% today. Pure-play EV companies’ market share is growing.\nThat’s the second belief required to stay bullish on EV makers’ stocks—that market share will continue to improve. “We suspect the market believes …that traditional OEMs will not be able to deliver competitive EV offerings in the future,” adds the analyst in his report. OEM is short for original equipment manufacturer, industry jargon for auto maker.\nThe final thing investors need to believe is that EVs will be more profitable, per car, than conventional vehicles. EV companies tend to sell direct—which can help profitability. EV makers are also the leaders in selling add-on subscription based services. Tesla’s Full Self-Driving Capability, or FSD, is probably the best example. Tesla sells the higher levels of its autonomous-driving software as a monthly subscription or for $10,000.\nThe mix of volume and profit growth driven by superior products could justify valuations, but Sacconaghi isn’t a believer. “Our contention is that the automotive industry is an increasingly global and hypercompetitive industry and we believe that surplus profits and technology innovation will likely be competed away over time.”\nHis views of the industry is one of the reasons he calls Tesla valuation “too rich.”\nTime will tell who is right. Sacconaghi’s target price still implies Tesla should be the world’s most valuable car company, just not two to three times the value of Toyota.\nTesla stock has been on a tear of late, adding 34% over the past three months as investors have become more bullish about third quarter earnings due out on Wednesday evening. Shares have gained another 3.2% Monday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"NIO":0.9,"XPEV":0.9,"DDAIF":0.9,"LI":0.9,"VLKAF":0.9,"TM":0.9,"GM":0.9,"01211":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":6294442,"gmtCreate":1634947408083,"gmtModify":1634947408176,"authorId":3567307840510045,"author":{"id":3567307840510045,"idStr":"3567307840510045","authorId":3567307840510045,"name":"JeremyKok","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/01b03a485f83b6b2615fad8ac9b87bf4","vip":1,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":850722618,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","text":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you.","html":"hi. please like and comment back. thank you."}],"langContent":"CN"}],"isCommentEnd":false,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":344,"commentSize":101,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":false,"tenantId":"TBCN","deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.36.2","shortVersion":"4.36.2","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"laohu8","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/1147398025","isCrawlerRequest":true}